ML20032C272
| ML20032C272 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/22/1981 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Bostrom D ANACONDA CO. (DIV. OF ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032C273 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900372 NUDOCS 8111090577 | |
| Download: ML20032C272 (2) | |
Text
7-OCT 2 e PJat Docket No. 99900372/81-01
/g[A[%
Anaconda-Ericsson Company PO Wire and Cable Division gI ATTN: Mr. D. O. Bostrom Manager, Quality Assurance
(
Fast 8th Stmet Marion, Indiana 46952 Gentlemen:
1his refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. R. E. 011er of this office se September 15-18, 1981, of your facility at York, Pennsylvania, associated with the manufacture of electrical cables and to the discussion of our fiddings with Mr. R. J. Montagno and other members of the plant staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was ende to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being abhieved; nor to assure that a specific product,
- omponent, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As vou know, the NRC requires doek of its licensees to asstane full respons!
- :,ility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from etters. You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our fiddings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representatives rm:ords, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the Implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific finding and reference to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing, (1) a de::cription of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken i.o prevent recurrence,aedd (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
?on $ $$? $11022 M. T.? 373 ac+. R I V...
a 4
sumo CI:CS(.
BC:VIB D:I&
"O RE011tr f" UPotap0vs""
"JEGa lardo-Mins" *
..l.0/16/.8)....1DI(.pl...... 30/.
8.1...... 1
/8.1.......
..$r........
CCRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM O240 \\
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
f I
Anaconda-Ericcson Company The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Managemer.t and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL %-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Cosmiission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any info' ution that you believe to be exerpt from 41sclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office h; telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for wishhold-ing; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information. If your receipt of this letter has been deleted such that less than 7 des are asailable for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with section 2.790(b)(1), any such appli-cation meet be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the infomation should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section further requires the statement of address with specificity theconsiderationslistedin10CFR2.790(b)(4). The information shogbbtt to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not heat ffnemyou in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
..gn t 96 a
- c. J. N Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Nonconformance 2.
Inspection Report No. 99900372/81-01 3.
Inspection Data Sheets, nine pages bec:
Chief, V&SPB, DR&RRI, HQS (Reinmuth)
ASME IE Files NBB&PVI NMSS AE00 QAB NRC:PDR Reg. Directors, I, II, III, V dtuagl iardo, KlV
- '"c'>
une roau m no.* ' " " * " "
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY