ML20032A355

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-341/81-15 on 810901-30.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20032A355
Person / Time
Site: Fermi 
Issue date: 10/15/1981
From: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Wells D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20032A356 List:
References
NUDOCS 8110290449
Download: ML20032A355 (2)


See also: IR 05000341/1981015

Text

_

?

._

.

.

OCT 151981

d'-Q s

6

/'t

Docka No. 50-341

The Detr Mt Edison Ccmpany

_ Og7g 8 gg

-~_

ATTN:

&. Donald A. Wells

q

J

Marsger, Quality Assurance

3;

geog

,<

%

2000 Second Avenue

A

Detroit, MI 48226

Q,.

a

/%

,

,

Gentlemen:

' V

"

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. B. H. Little

and P. M. Byron of this office on September 1-30, 1981, of activities at Enrico

. Fermi, Unit 2, authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-87 and to the

discussion of our findings with Mr. E. Griffing at the conclusion of the

inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during

the course of this inspection.

,

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's

Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you or

(4),

yourcontractorsbelievetobeexemptfromdisclosureunder10CFR95(a)(7)

it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within seven

days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for

-

i

withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five (25) days from the date of

i-

this letter a written application to this office to withhold such infor-

mation. Section 2.790 (b) (1) requires that any such applicatien must be

.

. accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which

identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains

,

,

gpl

'

50

1

$bb E80Polii8sg

.PDR

1.

-sen

e.

  • w

su_w p . A e. mee

mr.,m.

e

s

y

-

-

.

m

-

.

- -

- -

- - - - .

- - -

.

.

.

.

.

The istroit Edison Company

-2-

g y,

a full statement of the reasons which are the bases for the claim that the

information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further

requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed

in 10 CFR 2.790 (b) (4). The information sought to be withheld shall be

incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If

we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted

above, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be

placed in the Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

N

../

+1-+4

'

R. L. Spessard, Director

Division of Resident and

Project Inspection

Enclosure: IE Inspection

Report No. 50-341/81-15

ccw/ encl:

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

Ronald Cal' 'n, Michigan

Public Service Commission

Eugene B. Thomas, Jr.,

Attorney

gf/

39 )

f(/

CqS

RIIL

RII

RIII

RIEI

Ki i

St8eeter

S

sayd

ttle

gp sy'

w

,q,

/