ML20031G544

Summary of 810811 & 12 Meetings W/Utils Onsite Re Scheduling of Const & Observation of Const Activities Completed or in Progress

ML20031G544
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	10/13/1981
From:	Jabbour K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8110230203
Download: ML20031G544 (21)

Text

~

% 2 b

M

=

e OCT 131981 s

y n N 4 4

kW ud Y

Docket ilos.:

50-413/414 0CT22 E8W G uA%mY e

APPLICANT:

DUKE POWER COMPANY

[

FACILITY:

CATAGA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 14 2

SUBJECT:

SumARY OF AUGUST 11 AND 12,1981 IIEETIflGS AND SITE VISIT TO ASSESS C0hSTRUCT10N C0tiPLETION SCHEDULE On August 11, 1981, the ICC staff met with Duke Power Company (Duke); and on August 12, 1981, they met with Duke and Horth Carolina Itunicipal Power Agency Number 1, Co-owner of Catawba Unit 2.

Both meetings were held at the Catawba site to discuss the scheduling cf construction and to observe the construction activities completed or in progress. Attendeees of both meetings are listed in Enclosures 1 and 2.

MC representatives included a r.ierr.ber of the Caseload forecast Panel (hereafter called the Panel). Enclosure 3 is the n.eeting agendo. and Enclosure 4 is the handouts curing the presentation.

The purpose of the meetings and tour was to provide for the staff's independent assessment of construction completion for Unit 1.

Duke's current estimate for construction completion and fuel loading for Unit 1 is November 1983 which is three months behind their earlier scneduled completion date of August 1983. On April 7,1981 Duke filed an update to their application for operating licenses which was tendered on fiarch 26, 1979. Therefore, on ancillary purpose of the Panel's completion estimate was to provide a oasis for establishing a target date for review of the OL application.

Conclusions On the basis of the prer.ent constructioa status at Catawba, the fMC staff concluded that Duke's scheduls for support / restraint design,

~

_ fabrication and installation is overly optimistic to support Unit I hot 'functiona_l testing scheduled for April 1983 and associated fuel load date of August 1983. The staff also concluded that a more realistic fuel load date would be the first quarter of 1984, nominally February. To date, hanger design and construction are about 90 working days behind Duke's current target completion date. However, additional resources are being added; and Duke's management is fully committed to this recovery effort. Althougn not presently impacting the completion schedule, the stof f noted that the schedule for terminating cables appeared to be tight (relative to the performance of other plants) and that this area would further impact tne schedule if instrument availability is delayed. Tne staff inquired about Duke's priorities of ficGuire 2 vis-a-vis Catawba 1 and was informed that McGuire 2 is being completed; and, therefore, Duke's experienced personnel are being transferred to Catawba which should expedite its completion.

"C'>

B110230203 811013 cur)

PDR ADOCK 05000413 i

...................l A

P DR...............

i Ec equ 2isy_eq_uncu o24o _ _

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

• f "f8o-329724

7Q R

W T]

%~

c

3

.pe

%w w

n w

y g

y-

,v y

a.-

The tHC staff noted that, based.on Duke's construction completion date, the SER issue date will remain as scheduled and they indicated the need to visit the site (. gain in April 1982 to verify the progress made by Duke during this period.

i Kantan li. Jabbour, Project flanager Licensing Branch lio. 4 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page

(

J DISTRIBUTION SEE NEXT PAGE

/

1\\

l

...DL:LB#4(fD

.C.4'

. y.l.. g. ;..M.. r.

p omcep

.cuxuwe>K.J..a b..b. o u..r..:.e..b..

...E...... a.m.......

..h..).L..

==> 10../. 1.../. 81........

.% /......./. 81.......

.N.... V....N...........

unc ronn ais.io,eoi nacu o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

]* 'S8o-a2.

MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION Docket File G. Lear NRC/PDR S. Pawlicki Local PDR V. Benaroya TIC /NSIC/ TERA Z. Rosztoczy LB #4 r/f W. Haass H. Denton D. Muller E. Case R. Ballard D. Eisenhut W. Regan f

R. Purple R. Mattson B. J. Youngblood P. Check A. Schwencer

0. Parr F. Miraglia F. Rosa J. Miller W. Butler G. Lainas W. Kreger R. Vollmer R. Houston J. P. Knight T. Murphy R. Bosnak L. Rubenstein F. Schaus:r T. Spels R. E. Jackson W. Johnston Attorney, OELD S. Hanauer OELD W. Gammill OIE (3)

T. Murley ACRS(10)

F. Schroeder R. Tedesco D. Skovholt N. Hughes M. Ernst K. Kniel NRC

Participants:

G. Knighton A. Thadani D. Tondi J. Kramer D. Vassallo P. Collins D. Ziemann A. Toalston V. Moore M. Srinivasan Chief, SPEB: DST bec: Applicant & Service List R. Gamble E. Adensam Project Manager K. Jabbour Licensing Assistant M. Duncan O

m 4

- ~ - - - - - -

-,-,c,n

--n n----e

-- + - - *,

,-w-

-e-g--

-,--,m-

-+.-v------e, r

ern-s -- --

ENCLOSURE'l MEETING ATTENDEES August 11, 1981 Duke Power Company R. 0. Sharpe L. E. Suther J. W. Cox

)

. C. L. Jensen J

R. L. Weber-C. C. Rolfe H. G. Finion J. M.' Hark J. W. Hampton J. M. Lambert J. D. Duncan j

M. D. Hopkins L. C. Johnson G. W. Grier-W. G. Rixon

- C. L. R ay D. L. Freeze.

W. H. Lovelace, MPA/ Caseload Forecast Panel K. N. Jabbour, Project Manager, Licensing Branch 4, DL P. K. VanDoorn, Resident Inspector, IE 4

d l

I

ENCLOSURE 2 MEETING ATTENDEES AUGUST 12, 1981 Duke Power Company R. O. Sharpe L. E. Suther J. W. Cox C. L. Jensen T. Ford M. S. Tully J. C. Rogers C. C. Rol fe J. W. Hampton J. M. Lambert H. G. Finlon W. G. Rixon C. L. Ray S. W. Dressler G. W. firier i

North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1 D. M. Cameron Nuclear Regulatory Commission W. H. Lovelace, MPA/Caseloati Forecast Panel K. N. Jabbour, Licensing Project Manager, LB#4 P. K. VanDoorn, Resident Inspector, I&E

o

~

ENCLOSURE 3 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION AGENDA NRC CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL August 11, 1981, 8:30 a.m.

1. Opening Remarks R. O.

Sharpe/NRC

2. T roj ect Overview J. M. Lambert

3. Engineering Status a) Mechanical / Nuclear M.

D. Hopkins b) Support / Restraints C.

L.

Ray c) Electrical L. E. Suther 4 Constr'iction Status G. W. Grier a) Bulk Quantities b) Critical Path c) Craft Work Force d) Estimated Percent Completion

5. Procurement Status of Major Components E. D. Morton

6. Preoperational Testing C. Jensen

7. Other Requested Topics R. O. Sharpe a) Need for Power b) Financial c) NUREG-0737 August 12, 1981 Site Tour General Discussion Summary and Conclusions

r-----

O S

9 f

l i

I I

EliCLOSURE 4 l

l I

l

(

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION DESIGN ENGINEERING MECHANICAL / NUCLEAR DIVISION STATUS JULY 15, 1981 SYSTEMS STATION SERVICES 1.

FLOW DIAGRAM SHEETS UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 1 UNIT 2 TO BE ISSUED 283 172 74 14 ISSUED 283 172 54 13 REQUIPING SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 1

0 0

0 2.

SPECIFICATIONS & EVALUATIONS EQUIPMENT INSTRUMENTATION STATION SERVICES (STATION)

SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRED 163 119 18 SPECITICATIONS ISSUED 163 119 18 EVALUATIONS COMPLETED 161 119 18 3.

PROJECTED VALVE APPLICATIONS (STATION).

1.

PROCESS LINE VALVES 20.370 0

50 2.

INSTRUMENT LOOP VALVES 13,780 25,360 0

3.

MISCELLANEOUS VALVES 11,220 0

0 4.

TOTAL 45,370 25,360 50 4.

PIPING DESIGil (STATION)

POWER PIPING STATION SERVICES

. SUBSYSTEMS REQU'. RED 245 105 SUBSYSTEMS RELEASED 230 105 HVAC DESIGN (STATION)

LAYOUT DRAWINGS REQUIRED 194 LAYOUT DRAWINGS RELEASED 178 5.

PROJECTED INSTRUMENT ~

Loop DESIGNS UNIT 1 UNIT 2 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF LOOPS 7410 5100 APPROXIMATE NL.1BER 7150 4030 0F LOOPS RELEASED 6.

SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM:

REFLECTIVE TfPE INSULATION WILL BE INSTALLED ON REACTOR BUILDING PORTION OF 10 PIPING SYSTEMS.

INSULATION FABRICATION / INSTALLATION TYPE INTERFERENCES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO DESIGN ENGINEERING AND ARE BEING RESOLVED' EXPEDITIOUSLY TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON SCHEDULES.

9 Catawba Nuclear Station Support / Restraint S tatus Summary As of 7/2/81 l

~ UNIT 1 ORIGl>!AL Es tima te Complete Total Total Scheduled S/R Released S/R Behind Complete Complete This To Be of Schedule Schedule Report Period Released RIG 7787 6847 5804 349 6394 5518 876 ALT 12038 10767 8283 605 10828 7978 2850 EDS 2887 2462 2253 145 2641 2164 477 L&L 201.29 18903 18686 570 14214 14076 118

~

Total 43041 38979 35026 1669 34077 29736 4341 HVAC 2067 1748 1741-107 2067 1741 326 UNIT 11 RIG 7020 ALT 8014 EDS 2478 24 24 24 L&L 11472 Total 28984 24 24 24 HVAC 1904 1083 1083 71

l

"~

l'.r

• CATAWBA UNIT I AS-DESIGNED PRODUCTION SCHEDULE / STATUS GRAPH 36-

/

f

/

/

/

/

i 30 -

/

/

.)

/

/

/

m

/

24 -

/

/y O

//*

2 s

/

O

/

//

/

f.A IB -

2 m

/

x

,/

/

SCHEDULED RELEASE

-x-x-SCHEDULED S/R RELEASED

/,/

q D

- - -REASSESSED S/R RELEASE Q

~

/

/

--- TO TA L RELEASED D

/

/

/

/

6

/

2 y'

/

6-

/

/

l f*

/

F ' !, l ' A ' M ' J ' J ' A ' S ' O ' N ' D J'F'M'A'M'J'J'A'S'O'N'O J'F'M'A'M' 1980 1981 l982 l

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION ELECTRICAL DIVISION STATUS' JULY.15, 1981 UNIT 1 1.

ENGINEERING PACKAGES RELEASED TO DESIGN 217 TOTAL ISSUED 214 BEHIND SCHEDULE -

0 2.

SYSTEMS RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION 213 TOTAL l

ISSUED 210 BEHIND SCHEDULE -

0 l

'3.

CABLES-(AS OF 7/27/81)

ESTIMATED 18,866 18,391 ORIGINATED ISSUED 17,359 d

0 f.

g

. I.

,g i

g.

3............

.I

.g...

s i

i A.

,g.

7.~o

.e

~

.e.

u

g. e..,.

6...

3q.

4..g m

a

.f.

t % "*'

1 i

b* '.:..

• < u.. :

n'....

..l..._.......

~ g...-9[...

.. g 1.

.I

. c) l.

.s g

~

4 j

.s l.

i.

.o.

.. ~,....

..,(...

,3 g....... -

.... +

A g,,,

. 1..-...............

E,_.

- u

.1.......

3._

g 4

4 n

..J

• A^. !.., ~... I,,.

.g g

......u.

p g.

g 4....._.

i....a.

o_

.o i

.i t

t

-- w R,l

.q $.

.l

.d w

o

.~., \\.,,,.,,. \\.

q 6

., 4.;.

.,...g.-..i

\\,,,,

o,. o, o.

g

.o 4

. g,,, g

3..

g g,,

s

.a s.\\ m

k. og.,

O b

g

'*g g

.ee. -

.d y

.i

..m,.

- R*.

- o n.

..a e

g.......

o n.

u.

g

, g,,,.

g A. p- (.,

..i

+

2 s,....-..-

g G,

g h..

.j.

5,,..... +

M(

- =

~

.J B

._l........ ~.

u -

Gn..

s.

s r=

• s R-

3..

3 4

6 E

=d 89-1

i..,

1 n

g,,.

5 i.

o,,,

3 3,

3 g...

I,.,. g o.,.

5

%=

i,.

i.

=

r~

o 4

d,,

pg,.

f

\\ n,.

v.

\\-

s 3.~a -

.u

.4 N,e o.Q.,

.,i....

g-

. gg e4

.i n.

,o

=

......a.

e.

c u

q g

s, e.,,

g Ya

. i,. i.,.

.I, s,,,,.,

=

=

3 4

R j

g2

.,4,e t. e-f.

~\\>.

~

,.....t..

~

+

.. _ j.

u

..s.

R

.g

.... "3...

(2 l.

.3.... _...

..s.,.

g sa g

.\\

.L 4

.=. t 9

2 4

e..

........m.._

o, i

.... 4 o

e....,.

g 3

e s

,, g,

r n

2_..........

a:

,. h.

a i

s~

3.

o

.a a

...a.~.....C o

g.

gd w

1 4..

.. i.

q

>...i.._.

i.....

2

(,,.

y o

3

. o

. =

..o

..p..r e

,2,

,e,,

(.,,

g g

.2.

g =,

_......i......

5, 3

.I

,,, 4 o

t n

4 g

.+

.l l

i o

y j

,g 4

e o

..f,..

l s.,,.

.g:.

.o 2

1 l

i I

I I

I i

i i

i i

l i

I I

I I

I I

I

~

8 I"

. '.. l;....

E. 8 E E. 8 8 E E. 8 $8 8 8 8 8 E8 E. o.

E o

o o.

o.

.4 o

o

.o.

e m

a

,e

, g,s,.

e.

.g i

AS OF 7-19-81 o

CATAWBA 1 ESTIMATED FINAL QUANTITY QUANTITY CURRENT AVERAGE MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL IN PLACE SCHEDULED INSTALLED INSTALLATION RATE AREA QU41TITY TO DATE TO DATE COMPLETE LAST 12 MONTHS CONCRETE (STRUCTURAL) 241,000 CY 239,477 239,477 99.4 5575 PIPING 348,000 WV 338,489 336,793 96.8 2866 PIP:NG 301,000 LR7T 240,129 238,925 79.4 2033 CABLE 19,000 EA 14,843 14,733 77.5 336 CABLE 5,918,000 LRFT 4,753,265 4,805,642 81.2 92719 CABLE TERMINATIONS 38,000 EA 21,414 19,989 52.6 511 INSTRUMENTS 8,000 EQ LOOPS 5,856 5,125 64.1 200 PIPING S/R'S 43,000 EA 26,647 19,780 46.0 808 e

e FE5a.EI

<=:= =.

MANPOWElt PROJECTION

• s

-. ed t 68A

't ON.

\\ ct 83 1969 1485

-K-M A* ts+ l2rd w

3rd 4*

le 2rd hk Am 15 2rd 3rd 441% 2rd '3rd %

stra 1

b ekt% e.r-17 17 17 l1 t7 17 t1 11 17 17 17 17 12.

"I 'L 12.

U2.

(a

(,

tio

2. L \\ d.e.r-245 ZAs zR5 ER5 285 2.5 2tas 2:45 Zt.5 245 EA5 230 225 22 o 2cc tqs les 175 7

zu

S C.trne.rvt Ensshe.r-20 to Zo Zo 2n zo Zo Zn to Zo 2D

12. 8 8

9 9

Z.

2.

73 4 ConoMionElsei toen 38 3 M3 %5 31z. ZA7 Z81 47o 257 217 tro7 125 125 125 IES (so 2D 20 15 552.

5 bs w % Mer % i 11 3 11 3 11 3 11 3 11 3 183 1o5 99 93 85 77 al 62.

65 55 51 49 47 tot ts Cr e e. Openas.og 45 45 45 45 il 41 69 35 34 33 2.9 25 25 19 14 12.

10 a 45 7

Tb n+er 74 74 74 74 79 74 Go tab too (so so 40 40 So so zo zo zo

/t b

boe+eo.se. /Aecbarsie, scoz iGt 184 5 liO4 II7I, lord 91o &ls7 54o 437 74 1 224 134 tio

$0 8b 80 ton

~

i Sree.ia.O F.aup Operuser s7 ' 57 37 37 m m 34 a3 az SE 24 29 27 2.7 E5 25 24 Li zS to

% et w w e.r-Itao tho tso 15o 14 0 14 0 130 ito llo loo too too too too 86 Bo 60 80 15 6 in True.k 'Dr so er -

Its its 15 15 14 14 14 ni IS LS 12.

8 6

b 5

6 3

3 14 n 2.

u+,iity r e 245 245 24o z40 230 230 zco too 13 0

ttt, Leo ten too too so So 40 so z,qt 59 Wicter-P.s so 573 68 o 575 526 45o 31 3 24 7 19 5 120 96 too sD 4o 35 35 35 Soq k7 0.t e r ien 1 -

til 115 120 l'LI 120 lio tio iou 90 89 (oS tal SE 49 39 32 3o 2.9 18 5 Oher SW. 493 sig

Sat, 552..cDS aq7 49q M 402. ste7 34(o 3z4 zqo zao 1%

ti.S iza 4og TOTAL

% 53 SM 5726 3749 MD 3465 Sett ZM 23 % Zalk Ibn 147t it% stel 452. 8b7 743 66Z.

. 54tFL w e me see wacine

.is

.a sessees e

% e.

em a,.

=maena w. e semens wacs.

.I

~

l k

1.. ;.

.p ZD l 89 18 17 lan Ib 14 JS 12 18 10 9

8 7

to S

4 3

2 i

O l

uns manawaw

' NI P DwfP WLOD/

TTF,E7 Ik3 aq f.

,,,x y,

==u4 r, m

f,,,,,..

i

/n f us s)CedW tt UNsrnanmesN1 CAL.

er s.s

__g fw ct gay,, 9 7

r i

g N

k' r* N

>,e -

t

~

AfE 124OhC W.f 9

'fLW

• • • • M fgwm

[cr $d i

l so arri sr uv l

fMv

• ass =# 7RATd h' #NS7)

LLL tow aNTM.5 L-f*-.m.:

a

]u er

.c I

t gL JNST1 t. CA L.

i e swwo maw y,,m4.c

". *, )n._ t Ety "A inweu.

usem, l

_ y, c2 i

I 9, umeen.r P7"'

!=v ern.

cat.

iw sananarand1 l

CoM P Merf esd, FLs.m4 6

& AC 78*'r/E 5 NF q

NC FWedP stll5p l

dg f

gg amer 1ra4A AEV

'q/c, ne m ewmv l

i apr*

l lu susen. cat l

_ _ _.]

i 4 '/"

,sw'c.nzde_m l

ilq 'A

.47, gg l

i,,. cj i 1

luxe ruce-c w r-m c,.=

1 M4LLE* WkSA asla e

,',,, d,,,.,l,,,,

' " ' ' ' " - "^5" i

g.gt

r,s.,, - i eg _; !

[

rm.tw y

a m......~.~,..

I m.,<ste. 4t.1 l

j i

U i AWSA NUCLEAR STATION he tex usr!

I I

l l

l ny i

i I

i l

i UNIT.L l

l' p4 TA l

MOST~ CR/TicAL l

t

\\

l aarera ssviera 1

PATHS t

' wf M7#(O #Ff C3AFC d..

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION STEAM PRODUCTION PREOPERATIONAL TEST PROGRAM STATUS TEST PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT i

FUNCTIONAL TEST PROCEDURES No. Test Procedures No. Completed

% Yirst Draft No. Approved Identified First Drafts Complete Procedures' 9

179 -

128 71.5 18 i

Note: Test procedures are not submitted for SRC review until 90 days prior to test START UF TEST PROCEDURES No. Test Procedures No. Completed

% First Draft No. Approved Identified First Drafts Complete Procedures 42 2

4.7 0

TEST PROGRAM MANPOWER Number Eagineers currently available to participate in 41 this Preoperational Test program Number of Engineers planned by 1983 48 TEST PROGRAM PROGRESSION FUNCTIONAL TESTS No. Systems No. Test No. Test

% Completed Available to Test Started Complete Test 17 16 4

2.2 Systems in Test EPB 6.9KV Normal Auxiliary KR Recirculated Cooling Water MD Floor Drains (A)

EPD 600V Normal Power EPM 13.8KV Normal Auxiliary RF Halon/ Document Control EPW 600V Station Normal Auxiliary Power RF Halon/0A ETB 4160 Blackout Power RL Low Pressure Service Water ETC 600V Blackout Power VI Instrument Air

.e

.j T

lt T.

I.

==_1

!=

n ti t

l.,i r ig i..f.

~

I 12 i,,;

I 41 e}

y i Jo J

e i

av : crete 1

3

!! i I-Einsrast t.

53 r

t

I

.::::: st:

I y

l3 g

y g, g ga i

!! rty:::sseets 9

!!!!!!aix:sstsers.

II8888

!!8!:rsts:s i

!; :ves::

3 r

!!!!!!!!!! nessavn. i lur i

!!rasester I

!!ifr=asicas !E

!!!!!!!!!:::::ts ss: 3 sgte i E!!!!rars:ssriarsi ggs,,sg,ex J 11!!!!EstAe l

!!!!!:seeea V

!aianssi I gsgv 3

!!s l

!sre_i.

!!!! san t.

, lg g

!I-

!!!vsti

.!l?

!s I

.g g.

gx

..l cartsness i.

88 i i;

sgr

-s s

8

,3

!!iis _I ~

I

.a.

f v

s I Its I Ecssr j,,

t s

{I 1[xiE t, E

f* d*a ia E

E!s i.

o

.E!!

rs, t 1

c

1. rs i

!!!Er.I.

u v

rses I rr e Id_ v s

say i

EE 4 s

e IEE!!!k5 S'e'sI.,

!1 5e

{!iiT!!!sk I

!!!! I vva ~kgki

-g k

=tre! I

_g I-I:e a

er n

!!ilEtsi i

!s-wn

1 Ir

\\E I I

g f

i i

n'l t E $

e

\\! !

! I

......u w

,,,,,,..m

,me a,..

l'a%

y

• : t:

UNIT 1 TOTAL RESOUR'l DESCPIPTION EXPECTED SCHEDULE DAT.E, FLOAT IMPACT E

, -,, x

.w.

~

Refcelirg Water System (HF) Flush A 23/Sep/80 08/Au9/80 G s'

eys a

v keup Demineralizer Water System (YM)

A 24/Oct/80 22/Aug/80 a

Hydro C

M,, ^

- e g %, f.-

Filtered Water System (YF) Turnover A 03/Feb/81 02/Sep/80' 3

Aux. Boiler Feedwater System (CB)

A 24/0ct/80' 16/Sep/80 3

-[

A s

Turnover m;

9

' Wi^

~

1 i

Started Steam Supply to Constr.

A 19/Nov/80 13/Nov/80 Residual Heat Removal System (NO) Flush A 23/ Mar /81 10/Dec/80 Chemical and Volume Control System Flush 08/Sep/81 16/Feb/81 29 29 Hot Oil Flush A 06/Jul/81 10/ Mar /81 Steam Blow A 24/Jun/81 29/Apr/81 Main Turbine on Turning Gear IS/Dec/81 02/Sep/81 46 46 Condenser Alkaline Wasn 18/Dec/81 02/Sep/81 43 43 Hot Alkaline Wash 13/Jan/82 30/Sep/81 43 43 SafetyInjectionSystem'(hl)Tufhhver 05/Apr/82 ~ 30/0ct'/81 "

' 48"# ~ 4k h

~

.c

- ut e

24/Mab/82 ll/Dec/813[;,

38 cur 355M Steam Generator Hydro

^

n M ty AM:; WW Condensate Storage System (CS) Turnover Oo/Jun/82 27/Jan/82 49._ '^- ~

49 Comence Ice Loading (NF) 21/Jul/82 19/ Mar /82 65, 49 Begin Reactor Coolant System (NC) Hydro 04/Jan/83 24/Jun/82 34 '

9 Start Diesel Generator Operational Test 12/Jan/83 27/Sep/82 132 27 Condenser Circulating Water (RC) Test 28/Jan/83 30/Sep/82 143 6

s Start Condensate Clean Up (CM) 04/ Mar /83 16/Nov/87 80

-7 Receive New Fuel 16/Jun/R3 19/Jan/83 29

-59 Begin Hot functional Testing 07/Jul/83 il/Apr,/83 19

-65 Start Fuel Load IS/Nov/83 19/Aug/83 19

-65 100: Power 09/Jun/84 07/ Mar /84 19

-65 m-man a

" ' ~ ~

1

.e

1. 3

. CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY It is r.ot possible to predict at this time the long-range effect of energy conservation on load growth, nor the duration of financial constraints on construction.

The proposed schedule of capacity additions, therefore, is based on the best information available at present and, because of the tight money market, represents a minimum capitai investment.

To delay any unit beyond the proposed schedule can seriously jeopardize service to the system as a whole.

-For the year 1984, minimum reserve requirements are calculated to be:

Forecast 1984 Summer Peak Load 11,986 MW Add For Extreme Temperature 960 Add For Loss of Largest Unit on System 1,180 Add For Miscellaneous Capacity Reduction 642 Total Capacity Required 14,768 FN Reserve Over Forecast Peak 2,781 MW Reserve expressed as percent 23.2 In 1984 summer with Catawba 1 delayed one year, the following is calculated:

Reserve Total Capacity Load MW 14,501 MW 11,986 MW 2,515 21.0 The above comparison indicates that total reserves with Catawba delayed one year would be below the minimum requirements.

The following is a calculation of reserves on the Duke system if Catawba is delayed for 2 years and 3 years:

Two-Year Delay Year Capacity Load Reserve 1985 14,501 MW 12,413 MW 2,088 MW 16.8 Three-Year Delay Year Capacity Load Reserves

!~

1986 14,366 MW 12,934 MW 1,432 MW 11.1 It is apparent that the reliable operation of ths Duke system would not be seriously endangered with a one year delay in the. installation of Catawba.

!!owever, if Catawba is delayed more than one year, reserve requirements are not adequate to insure reliable operation of the Duke system.

First year of proposed operation replacement energy costs for Unit 1 and first year operatioa production costs are given in. Tables 1.3.1-1 and 1.3.1-2, sm Q~

respectively.

.Rev. 1 ER 1.3-1

.CNS-OLS

~

Y D

r h

gh j

mv ER Table 1.1.2-2 Catawba Nuclear Station Iage 1 of 2

. Duke System Load and Capacity - MW (1973-1990) e i

CAPACITY iYPE OF FUNCTION OF INSTALLED TOTAL PEAK RESERVE-UNIT ADDITIONS OF UNITS UNITS UNITS CAPACITY PURCHASE CAPABILITY LOAD MW FERCFNT 1973 8 171.6 813 8 984.6 8 23G 748.6 9.1

}

From ER Table 1.1.2-1 1974 Jocassee 1, 2 305 Pump Hydro Peak Belews Creek 1 060 Convent. Coal Base

-Adjust. In Hydro (165.9)

Hydro Peak

._ Retirements (105.7)

Misc.

Peak 9 265 293 9 558 8 058 1 500 18.6 l

1975 Oconee 2, 3 1 742 Nuclear Base Jocassee 3, 4 305 Pump Hydro Peak Retirements (91)

Misc.

11 221 169 1.1 390 8 422 2 968 35.2 1976 lieTews Creek 2 1 100 Convent. Coal Base

-Belews Creek 1 Uprate 40 Convent. Coal Base 12 361 165 12 530 8 601 3 S29 45.7

-1977 Dan River Diesel Removal (7)

Diesel Peak

-Adjustments to Oconee 1, 2, 3

'(33)

Nuclear Base

.Belews Creek 1, 2 Uprate 80 Convent. Coal Base Misc.: Adjustments (84)

Misc.

Peak 12 317 139 12 456 9 487 2 969 31.3 1978 Return Lee 4C to Service 30 Comb. Turb.

Peak

. Retire Urquhart 4G (25)

Comb..Turb.

Peak 12 322 129 12 451 9 690 2 761 28.5 (Feb.)

1979 12 322 129 12 451 9 844 2 607-26.5 None-T.'80

%5e 12 048 114 12 162 10 364 1 798 17.3 (July) 1981 McGuire 1 1 180 Nuclear Base 13 228 93 13 321 10 342

'2 979 28.8 1982 13 228 93 13 321 11 826 1 495 12.6.

None-1983 McGuire 2 -

1 180 Nuclear Base 14 408 33 14 501 11 476 3 025 26.4

~

(

ER Table 1.1.?-2 Cata.ba Nuclear Station Page 2 of 2 Duke Systern Lead and Capacity - FM (1973-1990)

CAPACITY TYPE OF FUNCTION OF INSTALLED TOTAL PEAK RESERVE UNIT ADDITIONS OF UNITS UNITS UNITS CAPACITY PURCHASE CAPABILITY LOAD MW PERCENT 1984 Catawba 1 1 145 Nuclear Base 15 553 93 15 646 11 986 3 660 30.5 1985 None 15 553 93 15 645 12 413 3 233 26.0 1986 Catawba 2 1 145 Nuclear Base Retirements (135)

CT Peak 16 '63 93 16 656 12 934 3 122 28.8 a

1987 IIe tTrements (93)

CT Peak IC 470 93 16 563 13 439 3 124 23.2 1988 Retirements (85)

CT Peak 16 385 93 15 478 14 009 2 469 17.6 1989 Retirements (90)

CT Peak 16 295 93 16 388 14 623 1 765 12.1 1990 Cherokee 1 1 280 Nuclear Base Bad Creek 1, 2 500 PS-Hydro Peak Retirements (108)

Coal icterned.

17 967 93 18 060 15 307 2 753 18.0

,