ML20031F625
| ML20031F625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/11/1981 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Hoover D WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20031F626 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900294 NUDOCS 8110200228 | |
| Download: ML20031F625 (2) | |
Text
-
4 SEP 1 1 1981 Docket No. 99900294/81-01 h[
Westinghouse Electric Corporation f
l f3 l
Medium Motor and Gearing Division y
ATTN: Mr. D. L. Hoover (1
U gOIl S 7pgI, General Manager C
Post Office Box 225
\\%,
Buffalo, NY 14240 6,
mMW
\\ /,
Gentlemen:
[
(,w ;_i cs
,x This refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. W. M. McNeill'of this office on July 6-10, 1981, of your facility at Buffalo, New York, associated with the fabrication of motors and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
4 This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not i
designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed b3 a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others. You should, therefore, not conclude that tha NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents, nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
i Please provide us within 30 days from the (ate of this letter a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct thes ~ items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will oe taken to pre it recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective i
actions and preventive m;,'tures were or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
l The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork ReductiDfLAct_Df_19
. PL 96-511.
s
- ,Qj '
->..... cs fg.,..,,,cs..t(f,,,,y.is.@,,,
,.. p E;; /,....
- v.,,,,,...,,,,, g' 5,,.
WMcN iU/.P.p}/F/81.,,tes p,l l UP,otapovs,,,g,Qag1,;,rd,o,
,1,l i n s,,
?.
hi 9/
9/(D/81
/ 9/p 1
9 eiioaooaaseio9t'tV.././..-
/81
.....(/81 om>
p L ""."'"2 ? "I* ' """ 'f
___._pgglC!m_ RECgRD COPY k
k
Westinghouse Electric Corporation 2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any infomation that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such infonnation.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven days are available for your review, please j
notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.
l Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied I
by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The infonnation sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Nonconfomance 2.
Inspection Report No. 99900294/81-01 3.
Inspection Data Sheets-Pages 1-3 bcc:
IE/V&SPB (Reinmuth)
IE Files AE0D NMSS NRC:PnR QAB REG. Directors I, II, III & V JEGagliardo, RIV emcc) suaswt)
"' I
~nc ro u m. io so, sacu 02' OFFICIAL RECORD COPY