ML20030B981

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-382/81-17 on 810706-10.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Follow Procedures in Area of Containment Welding
ML20030B981
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/1981
From: Gilbert L, Randy Hall, Whittlesey K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20030B977 List:
References
50-382-81-17, NUDOCS 8108250283
Download: ML20030B981 (3)


See also: IR 05000382/1981017

Text

- _ . .

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

,

Report:

50-382/81-17

,

l

Docket:

50-382

Category A2

i

Licensee: Louisiana Power and Light Company

142 Delaronde Street

l

New Orleans, Louisiana 70174

,

Facility Name: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3

Inspection at: Waterford Site, Taft, Louisiana

Inspection Conducted: July 6-10,1981

7/ </f /

4

-

Inspectors:

. D. Gilbert, deactor Inspector, Engineering and Materials

Date

Section (Paragraphs 1-6)

d

7/wkt

K. A. Whittlesey, React 6r Inspector - Trainee, Engineering

0~ ate

and Materials Section

.

7/w/f/

Approved:

f

Da'te '

,

R. E. Hall, Acting Chief, Engineering and Materials

j

Section

l

l

Inspection Summary

Inspection on July 6-10,1981 (Report 50-382/81-17)

Routine, unannounced inspection of construction activities

Araas Inspected:

related to w'eTding of Containment Vessel and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary

piping. The inspection involved 60 inspector-hours by two NRC inspectors.

l

In the two areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identi-

I

Results:

One violation was identified in the area of containment

!

fied in one area.

welding (violation - failure to follow procedures - paragraph 3).

8108250283 810724

,

t

PDR ADOCK 05000382

G

PDR

l----

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Principal Licensee Employees

  • L. L. Bass, Project QA Engineer
  • B. M. Toups, QA Engineering Technician

Other Personnel

i

  • J. DeBruin, ESSE Project Engineer, Ebasco

P. Vucelich, Corporate Welding Engineer, Chicago Bridge and Iron (CB&I)

L. Nunez, Project Welding and QA Supervisor

M. Folsom, Field QA Manager, Nuclear Installation Services Company

l

(NISCO)

The NRC inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor per-

sonnel including members of the engineering and QA/QC staffs.

  • Denotes those attending the exit interview.

2.

Site Tour

,

The NRC inspectors walked through the Reactor and Auxiliary Buildings

'

to oberve construction activities in progress and to inspect for

housekeeping.

No violations or deviations were identified.

3.

Reactor Containment Vessel

The NRC inspectors observed activities relrted to welding Weld Joint G

of Drawing 26 using Repair Procedure RP, Revision 2 for reinstallation

of the Containment Vessel Equipmer.t Hatch Cover.

Electrodes used for

welding were consistent with Welding Procedure WPS E7018/71-2426 and

l

traceable to certified material test reports.

However, control of unused

electrodes was not consistent with Section 8.0 to Division 4 of the CB&I

Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual for ASME Section III Products, Issue

)

No 6, in that, the NRC inspectors observed several unused welding elec-

trodes in a bucket and one on the floor in the CB&I work area after the

(

end of the work shift.

It was also observed the next morning that the

rod had neither been returned to the storage ovens, destroyed by bending,

nor removed from the work area and discarded to preclude inadverent use.

The NRC inspectors also detennined that reinstallation of the Equipment

Hatch Cover was classified by CB&I as a nonconformance/ repair, but the

work activity had neither been entered on the Nonconformance Control

)

List nor was it contrcRd and documented on a Repair Check List as

required in Section l',.0 to Division 4 of the CB&I Quality Assurance

Manual.

-2-

.

-

. -

_ _ _ _ _

__

. _ _ .

_ - -

--

. - _

i

!

These two examples of failure to follow procedures are an apparent

violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V.

4.

Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Pipino

The NRC inspectors reviewed the post weld heat treatment records for

three field welds in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary piping:

Welj P16Wl, Weld P16W2, and Weld P10W1 on Drawing 3015-003.

The post

weld heat treatments for Weld P16W1 and Weld P16W2 were consistent

with requirements of Welding Procedure WPS 10.1.14 and Heat Treataent

Procedure ES 3016-1.

During review of the post weld heat treatment

records for Weld P10Wl, the NRC inspectors were informed that a Noncon-

formance Report, NISCO 050, Revision 1 had been issued because the

.

time and temperature limitations for heat treataent had been exceeded.

,

I

The nonconformance report was reviewed and the status discussed with

"

Ebasco.

This item is considered unresolved pending final disposition and review

of the nonconformance report.

5.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required

in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, violations,

or deviations. An unresolved item related to Reactor Coolant Pressure

Boundary piping is discussed in paragraph 4.

6.

Exit Interview

The NRC inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in

paragraph 1) and J. E. Cummins (NRC Resident Reactor Inspector) on

July 10, 1981, and summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.

i

l

i

!

.

-3-

'

l

t