ML20029E978

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NEI Additional Input for the Rulemaking for Physical Security for Advanced Reactors January 2020
ML20029E978
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 01/10/2020
From: Austgen K
Nuclear Energy Institute
To: William Reckley, Nanette Valliere
NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP, Nuclear Energy Institute
Valliere N. NRR/DANU/UARP, 301-415-8462
Shared Package
ML20029E959 List:
References
NRC-2017-0227, RIN 3150-AK19
Download: ML20029E978 (10)


Text

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page1of10 1/10/2020

ThecommentsbelowshouldbereviewedinconjunctionwiththoseprovidedinNEIletter,NEICommentsonDraftRegulatoryBasis,Rulemakingfor PhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors[DocketID:NRC20170227],datedAugust15,2019.Anycommentsthatwouldprolongtherulemaking scheduleorrequireadditionaldirectionfromtheCommissionshouldbeheldforfuturedispositioninanothereffort.

ID#

Regulation Comments 1

Generalcomment Theassessmentofpotentialregulationchangesshouldexamineall prescriptiverequirementsin10CFR73.55todeterminetheirnecessity withinaperformancebasedframework.Ingeneral,afacilitylicenseshould begrantediftheapplicantcandemonstratethatthesitephysicalprotection program,toincludeindividualsperformingsecurityfunctions,inconjunction withthefacilitydesignandsafetyfeatures,providesreasonableassurance thatadversaryactionscouldnotleadtooffsitedosesabovespecifiedvalues (e.g.,thereferencevaluesdefinedin10CFR50.34and52.79).Thiswould provideflexibilityforanapplicanttoproposeacombinationofbarriers, accesscontrols,searchprograms,detectionandassessmentcapabilities,etc.

tomeetaperformancemeasure.Performancebasedapproachesare particularlyimportantfordesignswithverylowpotentialoffsite consequences(e.g.,microreactors).

2 10CFR§73.2Definitions Includetermsanddefinitionsasneededtosupportclearunderstandingof newrulerequirements.

Considerrevisingthedefinitionofphysicalbarrierorcreateanewterm anddefinitionforbarriertoallowforobstructionsbasedonothermethods andtechnologythatcouldaccomplishtheintendedfunction(e.g.,

deterrence,delay,denial,supportotherelementsofthephysicalprotection program).

3

§73.55(a)Introduction (5)TheTennesseeValleyAuthorityWattsBarNuclearPlant,Unit 2,holdingacurrentconstructionpermitundertheprovisionsof part50ofthischapter,shallmeettherevisedrequirementsin paragraphs(a)through(r)ofthissectionasapplicabletooperating nuclearpowerreactorfacilities.

ThereferencetoWattsBarUnit2canberemovedsinceconstructionis completedandanoperatinglicenseissued.

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page2of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments 4

§73.55(a)Introduction (6)Applicantsforanoperatinglicenseundertheprovisionsofpart 50ofthischapter,orholdersofacombinedlicenseunderthe provisionsofpart52ofthischapterthatdonotreferencea standarddesigncertificationorreferenceastandarddesign certificationissuedafterMay26,2009shallmeettherequirement of§73.55(i)(4)(iii).

Achangemaybenecessarytorecognizenewalternativerequirementsfor secondaryalarmstations.

5

§73.55(b)Generalperformanceobjectiveandrequirements.

(1)Thelicenseeshallestablishandmaintainaphysicalprotection program,toincludeasecurityorganization,whichwillhaveasits objectivetoprovidehighassurancethatactivitiesinvolvingspecial nuclearmaterialarenotinimicaltothecommondefenseand securityanddonotconstituteanunreasonablerisktothepublic healthandsafety.

(2)Tosatisfythegeneralperformanceobjectiveofparagraph (b)(1)ofthissection,thephysicalprotectionprogrammustprotect againstthedesignbasisthreatofradiologicalsabotageasstatedin

§73.1.

(3)Thephysicalprotectionprogrammustbedesignedtoprevent significantcoredamageandspentfuelsabotage.Specifically,the programmust:

(i)Ensurethatthecapabilitiestodetect,assess,interdict,and neutralizethreatsuptoandincludingthedesignbasisthreatof radiologicalsabotageasstatedin§73.1,aremaintainedatall times.

(ii)Providedefenseindepththroughtheintegrationofsystems, technologies,programs,equipment,supportingprocesses,and implementingproceduresasneededtoensuretheeffectivenessof thephysicalprotectionprogram.

Thissectionwillneedrevisiontorecognizetheavailabilityofperformance measuresfordeterminingtheapplicabilityofrevisedsecurityrequirements andtheassociatedperformancebasedalternativestoprescribed requirements.

Considerreplacinghighassurancewithreasonableassurancetoalign withCommissiondirectioninStaffRequirementsMemorandums;thiswill eliminateconfusionandprovideconsistencyofterminologyusedwithinthe regulation.

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page3of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments (4)Thelicenseeshallanalyzeandidentifysitespecificconditions, includingtargetsets,thatmayaffectthespecificmeasuresneeded toimplementtherequirementsofthissectionandshallaccount fortheseconditionsinthedesignofthephysicalprotection program.

(5)Upontherequestofanauthorizedrepresentativeofthe Commission,thelicenseeshalldemonstratetheabilitytomeet Commissionrequirementsthroughtheimplementationofthe physicalprotectionprogram,includingtheabilityofarmedand unarmedpersonneltoperformassigneddutiesandresponsibilities requiredbythesecurityplansandlicenseeprocedures.

(6)Thelicenseeshallestablish,maintain,andimplementa performanceevaluationprograminaccordancewithappendixBto thispart,todemonstrateandassesstheeffectivenessofarmed respondersandarmedsecurityofficerstoimplementthe licenseesprotectivestrategy.

(9)Thelicenseeshallestablish,maintain,andimplementaninsider mitigationprogramandshalldescribetheprograminthePhysical SecurityPlan.

(i)Theinsidermitigationprogrammustmonitortheinitialand continuingtrustworthinessandreliabilityofindividualsgrantedor retainingunescortedaccessauthorizationtoaprotectedorvital area,andimplementdefenseindepthmethodologiestominimize thepotentialforaninsidertoadverselyaffect,eitherdirectlyor indirectly,thelicenseescapabilitytopreventsignificantcore damageandspentfuelsabotage.

6

§73.55(d)Securityorganization.(1)Thelicenseeshallestablish andmaintainasecurityorganizationthatisdesigned,staffed, trained,qualified,andequippedtoimplementthephysical protectionprograminaccordancewiththerequirementsofthis section.

Theorganizationatanadvancedreactorsitemaybesignificantlydifferent thantheorganizationsatcurrentlyoperatingLLWRsites.Inparticular,itis likelythatindividualswillbetrainedandqualifiedtoperformanumberof functionsanddutiesconcurrently(withsupporting/enablingtechnologies),

includingsecurityfunctionsandduties.Thisshouldbepermittedprovided

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page4of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments (2)Thesecurityorganizationmustinclude:

(ii)Atleastonemember,onsiteandavailableatalltimes,whohas theauthoritytodirecttheactivitiesofthesecurityorganization andwhoisassignednootherdutiesthatwouldinterferewiththis individualsabilitytoperformthesedutiesinaccordancewiththe securityplansandthelicenseeprotectivestrategy.

thereisreasonableassurancethatthesecurityplanfunctionsnecessaryto preventoffsitedosesabovespecifiedvalues(e.g.,thereferencevalues definedin10CFR50.34and52.79)canbeperformed.

7

§73.55(e)Physicalbarriers.

(3)Physicalbarriersmust:

(i)Bedesignedandconstructedto:

(A)Protectagainstthedesignbasisthreatofradiologicalsabotage; (9)Vitalareas.

(v)Ataminimum,thefollowingshallbeconsideredvitalareas:

(A)Thereactorcontrolroom; (B)Thespentfuelpool; (C)Thecentralalarmstation;and (D)Thesecondaryalarmstationinaccordancewith§ 73.55(i)(4)(iii).

(10)Vehiclecontrolmeasures.Consistentwiththephysical protectionprogramdesignrequirementsof§73.55(b),andin accordancewiththesitespecificanalysis,thelicenseeshall establishandmaintainvehiclecontrolmeasures,asnecessary,to protectagainstthedesignbasisthreatofradiologicalsabotage vehiclebombassault.

(i)Landvehicles.Licenseesshall:

(A)Design,construct,install,andmaintainavehiclebarrier system,toincludepassiveandactivebarriers,atastandoff distanceadequatetoprotectpersonnel,equipment,andsystems necessarytopreventsignificantcoredamageandspentfuel

1) Seecomment#2above.
2) Thephysicalbarriersrequiredforanadvancedreactorfacilityshouldbe thosenecessarytomeettheperformancemeasurethatpermittedthe facilitytoqualifyforperformancebasedalternativestoprescribed requirements.
3) Advancedreactorfacilitiesmayormaynotincludevitalequipment,as definedin§73.2,inthelistedareas.Theareasrequiringdesignationas avitalareashouldbethosewiththeequipmentthatpermittedthe facilitytoqualifyforperformancebasedalternativestoprescribed requirements(i.e.,equipmentsupportingtheapplicableperformance measure).

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page5of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments sabotageagainsttheeffectsofthedesignbasisthreatof radiologicalsabotagelandvehiclebombassault.

8

§73.55(g)Accesscontrols.

(3)Vehiclesintheprotectedarea.

(iv)Vehiclestransportinghazardousmaterialsinsidetheprotected areamustbeescortedbyanarmedmemberofthesecurity organization.

Ifvehiclestransportinghazardousmaterialscouldnotbeemployedtocause unacceptableoffsiteconsequences(e.g.,dosesgreaterthanthereference valuesdefinedin10CFR50.34and52.79),thenanarmedsecurityescort shouldnotberequired.

9

§73.55(h)Searchprograms.

(1)Theobjectiveofthesearchprogramistodetect,deter,and preventtheintroductionoffirearms,explosives,incendiary devices,orotheritemswhichcouldbeusedtocommitradiological sabotage.

(2)Ownercontrolledareasearches.

(iv)Vehiclesearchesmustbeaccomplishedthroughtheuseof equipmentcapableofdetectingfirearms,explosives,incendiary devices,orotheritemswhichcouldbeusedtocommitradiological sabotage,orthroughvisualandphysicalsearches,orboth,to ensurethatallitemsareidentifiedbeforegrantingaccess.

(3)Protectedareasearches.Licenseesshallsearchallpersonnel, vehiclesandmaterialsrequestingaccesstoprotectedareas.

(iii)Whenanattempttointroducefirearms,explosives,incendiary devices,orotheritemswhichcouldbeusedtocommitradiological sabotagehasoccurredorissuspected,thelicenseeshall implementactionstoensurethatthesuspectindividuals,vehicles, andmaterialsaredeniedaccessandshallperformavisualand physicalsearchtodeterminetheabsenceorexistenceofathreat.

Thesearchprogramsandcapabilitiesrequiredforanadvancedreactor facilityshouldbethosenecessarytosupporttheperformancemeasure thatpermittedthefacilitytoqualifyforperformancebasedalternativesto prescribedrequirements.

10

§73.55(i)Detectionandassessmentsystems.

(2)Intrusiondetectionequipmentmustannunciateandvideo assessmentequipmentshalldisplayconcurrently,inatleasttwo TheserequirementsshouldrecognizetheestablishmentofaSecondary AlarmStation(SAS)ataremotelocation.Further,therequirementsshould beflexiblewithrespecttoacceptableremotelocations,detectionand

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page6of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments continuouslystaffedonsitealarmstations,atleastoneofwhich mustbeprotectedinaccordancewiththerequirementsofthe centralalarmstationwithinthissection.

(4)Alarmstations.

(i)Bothalarmstationsrequiredbyparagraph(i)(2)ofthissection mustbedesignedandequippedtoensurethatasingleact,in accordancewiththedesignbasisthreatofradiologicalsabotage definedin§73.1(a)(1),cannotdisablebothalarmstations.The licenseeshallensurethesurvivabilityofatleastonealarmstation tomaintaintheabilitytoperformthefollowingfunctions:

(ii)Licenseesshall:

(B)Continuouslystaffeachalarmstationwithatleastonetrained andqualifiedalarmstationoperator.Thealarmstationoperator mustnotbeassignedotherdutiesorresponsibilitieswhichwould interferewiththeabilitytoexecutethefunctionsdescribedin§ 73.55(i)(4)(i)ofthissection.

(C)Notpermitanyactivitiestobeperformedwithineitheralarm stationthatwouldinterferewithanalarmstationoperators abilitytoexecuteassigneddutiesandresponsibilities.

(F)Ensurethatanalarmstationoperatorcannotchangethestatus ofadetectionpointordeactivatealockingoraccesscontrol deviceataprotectedorvitalareaportal,withouttheknowledge andconcurrenceofthealarmstationoperatorintheotheralarm station.

(G)Ensurethatoperatorsinbothalarmstationsare knowledgeableoffinaldispositionofallalarms.

(iii)Applicantsforanoperatinglicenseundertheprovisionsofpart 50ofthischapter,orholdersofacombinedlicenseunderthe provisionsofpart52ofthischapter,shallconstruct,locate, protect,andequipboththecentralandsecondaryalarmstations tothestandardsforthecentralalarmstationcontainedinthis assessmentalarmandmonitoringcapabilities,andstaffing.Forexample,a microreactorfacilitycouldhaveaSASarrangementwiththelocallaw enforcementagency(suchasremotealarmsinapolicestation)oranSMR vendormightsupplyasingleSAStoserveallsitesthatusetheirtechnology.

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page7of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments section.Bothalarmstationsshallbeequalandredundant,such thatallfunctionsneededtosatisfytherequirementsofthis sectioncanbeperformedinbothalarmstations.

(5)Surveillance,observation,andmonitoring.

(i)Thephysicalprotectionprogrammustincludesurveillance, observation,andmonitoringasneededtosatisfythedesign requirementsof§73.55(b),identifyindicationsoftampering,or otherwiseimplementthesiteprotectivestrategy.

(ii)Thelicenseeshallprovidecontinuoussurveillance,observation, andmonitoringoftheownercontrolledareaasdescribedinthe securityplanstodetectanddeterintrudersandensurethe integrityofphysicalbarriersorothercomponentsandfunctionsof theonsitephysicalprotectionprogram.Continuoussurveillance, observation,andmonitoringresponsibilitiesmaybeperformedby securitypersonnelduringcontinuouspatrols,throughuseofvideo technology,orbyacombinationofboth.

(iii)Unattendedopeningsthatintersectasecurityboundarysuch asundergroundpathwaysmustbeprotectedbyaphysicalbarrier andmonitoredbyintrusiondetectionequipmentorobservedby securitypersonnelatafrequencysufficienttodetectexploitation.

(iv)Armedsecuritypatrolsshallperiodicallycheckexternalareas oftheprotectedareatoincludephysicalbarriersandvitalarea portals.

(v)Armedsecuritypatrolsshallperiodicallyinspectvitalareasto includethephysicalbarriersusedatallvitalareaportals.

11

§73.55(j)Communicationrequirements.

2)Individualsassignedtoeachalarmstationshallbecapableof callingforassistanceinaccordancewiththesecurityplansandthe licenseesprocedures.

Seecomment#10above.

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page8of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments (3)Allondutysecurityforcepersonnelshallbecapableof maintainingcontinuouscommunicationwithanindividualineach alarmstation,andvehicleescortsshallmaintaincontinuous communicationwithsecuritypersonnel.Allpersonnelescortsshall maintaintimelycommunicationwiththesecuritypersonnel.

(4)Thefollowingcontinuouscommunicationcapabilitiesmust terminateinbothalarmstationsrequiredbythissection:

12

§73.55(k)Responserequirements.

(1)Thelicenseeshallestablishandmaintain,atalltimes,properly trained,qualifiedandequippedpersonnelrequiredtointerdict andneutralizethreatsuptoandincludingthedesignbasisthreat ofradiologicalsabotageasdefinedin§73.1,topreventsignificant coredamageandspentfuelsabotage.

(3)Thelicenseeshalltraineacharmedmemberofthesecurity organizationtopreventorimpedeattemptedactsofradiological sabotagebyusingforcesufficienttocountertheforcedirectedat thatperson,includingtheuseofdeadlyforcewhenthearmed memberofthesecurityorganizationhasareasonablebeliefthat theuseofdeadlyforceisnecessaryinselfdefenseorinthe defenseofothers,oranyothercircumstancesasauthorizedby applicableStateorFederallaw.

(4)Thelicenseeshallprovidearmedresponsepersonnelconsisting ofarmedresponderswhichmaybeaugmentedwitharmed securityofficerstocarryoutarmedresponsedutieswithin predeterminedtimelinesspecifiedbythesiteprotectivestrategy.

(5)Armedresponders.

(i)Thelicenseeshalldeterminetheminimumnumberofarmed respondersnecessarytosatisfythedesignrequirementsof§ 73.55(b)andimplementtheprotectivestrategy.Thelicenseeshall documentthisnumberinthesecurityplans.

Afacilitydesignmeetingaperformancemeasurewouldpermitthe applicanttoestablishadetect,assessandcommunicatesecurityresponse; anonsitearmedresponseforcewouldnotbenecessaryforthreat interdictionandneutralization.Shouldafacilityrequireanarmedresponse forcebecauseaperformancemeasurecannotbemet,thenthe Responserequirementsshouldbethosenecessarytoprovidereasonable assurancethatadversaryactionscouldnotleadtooffsitedosesabove specifiedvalues(e.g.,thereferencevaluesdefinedin10CFR50.34and 52.79).Thefacilityspecificrequirementscouldbedeterminedthroughan analysis(e.g.,usetheguidanceinNUREG/CR7145,NuclearPowerPlant SecurityAssessmentGuide).Aminimumnumbershouldnotbespecified inregulations.

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page9of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments (ii)Thenumberofarmedrespondersshallnotbelessthanten (10).

(iii)Armedrespondersshallbeavailableatalltimesinsidethe protectedareaandmaynotbeassignedotherdutiesor responsibilitiesthatcouldinterferewiththeirassignedresponse duties.

(6)Armedsecurityofficers.

(i)Armedsecurityofficers,designatedtostrengthenonsite responsecapabilities,shallbeonsiteandavailableatalltimesto carryouttheirassignedresponseduties.

(ii)Theminimumnumberofarmedsecurityofficersdesignatedto strengthenonsiteresponsecapabilitiesmustbedocumentedin thesecurityplans.

(7)Thelicenseeshallhaveprocedurestoreconstitutethe documentednumberofavailablearmedresponsepersonnel requiredtoimplementtheprotectivestrategy.

8)Protectivestrategy.Thelicenseeshallestablish,maintain,and implementawrittenprotectivestrategyinaccordancewiththe requirementsofthissectionandpart73,appendixC,SectionII.

Uponreceiptofanalarmorotherindicationofathreat,the licenseeshall:

ii)Initiateresponseactionstointerdictandneutralizethethreatin accordancewiththerequirementsofpart73,appendixC,section II,thesafeguardscontingencyplan,andthelicenseesresponse strategy.

13 AppendicesBandCtoPart73 Dependinguponhowthestaffstructuresthenewregulations,changesmay beneededtotheseappendicestoalignthecontentswithnew performancebasedalternativestoprescribedrequirements.Forexample, afacilitythatisnotrequiredtomaintainanonsiteresponseforceforthreat

January2020NEIAdditionalInputfortheRulemakingforPhysicalSecurityforAdvancedReactors (RINNumber:3150AK19/NRCDocketID:NRC20170227)

Page10of10 1/10/2020

ID#

Regulation Comments interdictionandneutralizationwouldnotneedaperformanceevaluation programoraprotectivestrategy.

14 Variousother10CFRsectionsandparagraphs

Dependinguponhowthestaffstructuresthenewregulations,conforming changesmaybeneededtoothersectionsandparagraphsin10CFR.See NEIWhitePaper,ProposedPhysicalSecurityRequirementsforAdvanced ReactorTechnologies,Attachment1,ProposedChangesto10CFRfor NewPhysicalSecurityRequirementsforAdvancedReactorTechnologies, forexamples.

15 Additionalconsiderationsformicroreactors Thepotentialconsequencesformicroreactorsareexpectedtobesimilarto researchandtestreactors,forwhichthereisnoDBT.Therefore, establishmentoftherequirementsthatareapplicabletomicroreactors shouldconsidertherequirementsin10CFR73.60,Additional requirementsforphysicalprotectionatnonpowerreactors,and10CFR 73.67,Licenseefixedsiteandintransitrequirementsforthephysical protectionofspecialnuclearmaterialofmoderateandlowstrategic significance,applicabletononpowerreactors.Considerationshouldalso begiventoalternativestorequirementstoprotectagainsttheftand diversionandcybersecurity.Morespecificrecommendationsonthe physicalsecurityformicroreactorsareincludedintheNEIWhitePaper, MicroReactorRegulatoryIssues,AppendixE,PhysicalSecurity.