ML20028F899
| ML20028F899 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley, Salem, Surry  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1982 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Sholly S UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027A699 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-530, RTR-NUREG-0771, RTR-NUREG-0772, RTR-NUREG-771, RTR-NUREG-772, RTR-NUREG-CR-2629 NUDOCS 8302070076 | |
| Download: ML20028F899 (6) | |
Text
..
4n.
4)ft-oty
\\
f nco
),
UNITED STATES
[ h c g#'[ 8 h
NUCLEAR REGULAlORY COMMISSION W
C WASHINtiT Cid D C. 20$55 g. Q h: [f,
g December 21, 1982 Mr. Steven Sholly Technical Research Assistant Union of Concerned Scientists 1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20036 TO FOIA-82-530
Dear Mr. Sholly:
This is in partial response to your letter dated November 2,1982, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 22 categories of documents which you identified in your letter.
On December 8, 1982, a meeting was held to discuss the documents requested in your letter.
Those in attendance at this meeting were Mr. John C. Carr and Ms. Nina L. Toms of my staff, and Mr. Roger Blond of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
As a result of this meeting, it was agreed that the documents listed on Appendix A are responsive to your request.
A copy of these documents are being placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20555.
The documents listed on Appendix B are being withheld in their entirety.
Without exception, they are predecisional documents exempt from mandatory public disclosure pursuant to the deliberative process privilege of Exempi. ion 5 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and the Commission's regulations (10 CFR 9.5(a)(5)).
These documents represent NRC staff interaction in the preparation of draft testimony generated at the direction of NRC hearing attorneys for the Indian Point Hearings.
These documents represent attorney work product.
The factual portions, if any, of these documents are inextricably intertwined with advice, opinions, and recommendations.
Thus, there are no reasonably segregable portions of these documents subject to release.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.15 of the Commissions regulations, it has been deter-mined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest.
The person responsible for this denial is Mr. Guy H. Cunningham, III, Executive Legal Director.
1 8302070076 821221 PDR FOIA SHOLLY82-530 PDR
Mr. Steven Sholly This denial may be appealed to the Consission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.
As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial FOIA Decision."
Sinc rely,
/
2 f fd,
/
M. Felton, Director
[.!.
Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosures:
Appendix A and B 6
,2 Re:
F01A-82-530 Appendix A 1.
Undated Status of Support Work for Reactor Siting Criteria Rulemaking (19 pages) 2.
Undated Concept Paper - A Study to Evaluate.and Revise the Economic Component of the-CRAC Model (6 pages) 3.
3/21/79 Nuclear System Components - A Review of Typical. Design and Operating Characteristics of Components Used in Nuclear Power Plant Systems - Science Applications, Inc. (322 pages) 4.
11/14/80 Memo for the F.ile from Mark E. Resner re: Potential' Sabotage -
Salem Nuclear Station (1 page) 5.
11/19/80 Memo for the File from Mark E. Resner re: Potential Sabotage -
Salem Nuclear Station (1 page) 6.
11/21/80 Memo for the File from Mark E. Resner re: Possible Sabotage.-
Salem Nuclear Plant (1 page) 7.
11/23/80 Memo for File 80-11 from Mark E. Resner re: Potential Sabotage -
Salem Nuclear Station (2 pages) 8.
11/25/80 Femo for File 81-11 from Mark E. Resner re: Potential Sabotage -
Salem Nuclear Station (1 page) 9.
11/25/80 Letter to Robert Kurzweil, Esquire, from James J. Cummings re:
Section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (2 pages)'
10.
11/28/80 Memo for Boyce H. Grier from Roger A. Fortuna re: Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1; Region I Investigation of Potential Act of Industrial Sabotage (1 page) 11.
4/81 NUREG/CR-1748 - Hazards to Nuclear Power Plants from Nearby Accidents Involving Hazardous Materials - A Preliminary Assessment (129 pages) 12.
6/17/81 Inspection Report 81-17 (already located in the Public Document Room) 13.
6/19/81 LER 81-47 (already located in the'Public Document Room) 14.
6/29/81 Memo for Samuel J. Chilk from William J. Dircks re: Response to Commissioners' Requests During Briefing on SECY-81-240, Draft NUREG-0771 and NUREG-0772 (12 pages)
Re: F01A-82-530 Appendix A 15.
7/6/81 Memo for J. ' Martore et. al. from J. L. Crooks re: Abnormal Occurrence Report to Congress for Second Quarter CY 1981 w/ attached note dated 10/29/81 (9:pages) 16.
7/6/81 NRC AE0D Letter to U.S. Congress (already located in the Public Document Room) 17.
11/81 Draft - Improving Socioeconomic Impact Assessments of Nuclear Power Plant Accidents by J. J. Tawil et. al. (140 pages) 18.
12/7/81 Memo to Dircks from Haynes of RI (already located in the Public Document Room) 19.
12/10/81 Inspection Report 81-16 (already located in the Public Document Room) 20.
1/18/82 Input Comments for ED0-11387 (RES-94) on EPRI Letters ito FEMA and Chairman Palladino (3 pages)
\\
21.
1/28/82 Memo for Ronald M. Scroggins from Roger M. Blond re: Emergency Planning and Source Term Developments (13 pages) 22.
3/11/d2 Memo for W. Pasedag from R. Sherry re: Review of ORNL Draft Interim Source Term Report (11 pages) 23, 3/11/82 Letter to M. C. Thadani from R. O. Chester re: Peer Review-i of Draft Report on " Interim Source Term Assumptions for Emergency Planning arid Equipment Qualifications" (79 pages) 24.
3/24/82 Memo for C. J. Heltemes from George W. McCorkle re: Informati on Regarding Beaver Valley (2'pages) i 25.
6/30/82 DraftNorkingPaperre: Vandalism at Salem (1 page) 26.
6/30/82 NRC's Physical Research on the Radiological Source Term by Dr. Charles N. Kelber (23 pages) 27.
Duquesne Light to NRC (Haynes to RI) Letters dated 8/10/82 dated 8/4/81 dated 7/2/81 dated 1/12/82 (already located -in the Public Document Room) 28.
9/16/82 NRC (RI) Letter to Duquesne Light (already located in the Public Document Room)
o '.
- c Re:
F01A-82-530 Appendix A
- 29. - 10/3-6/82 NRC Activities in the Regulation of Radiation by Robert 8.
Minogue (20 pages) 30.
11/8/82 Preliminary Notification of Safeguards Event - PNS-I-82-10 dated 8/17/82 (2 pages) and PN of Safeguards Event PNS-I-82-9, dated 8/10/82 (2 pages) 31.
1/77 Influence of Plume Rise on the Consequences of Radioactive Material Releases by A. J. Russo et. al. (26 pages) 32.
10/82 NUREG/CR-2899 - Analysis of a Proposed One Thousand Dollar Per.
Man-Rem Cost Effectiveness Criterion by David R. Strip _(13 pages).
33.
Undated Schedule 189 - Nuclear Power Plant Siting (6 pages)
OH e
5 e
9 1
{
l
Ee: '!0
- 4 2-530 Appendix B 1.
Memorandurn for Stephen H. Hanau~r from R. Wayne Houston, " Indian Point. Hearing: Risk Testimony Sections III.C.A. and III.C.B.,"
September 13, 1982, enclosing draft testimony of S. Acharya regarding NRC Staff Assessment of Accident Consequences and Risks and joint testimony of S. Acharya and R. Blond regarding Calculational l'ethodology of the CRAC Code.
2.
Draf t NUREG/CR-2715, PNL-4270, " Radioactive Gas Release from Light Water Reactor Fuel," June 1982.
3.
Draft testimony of Sanford Israel, Risk Analyst, Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch, Division of Safety Technology, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
4.
Draft testimony of James F. Meyer, Senior Task Manager, Reactor Systems Branch, Division of Systems. Integration, Office of Nuclear Reactor.
Regulati on.
5.
Draft testimony of-Frank Rowsome, Deputy Director, Division of Risk Analyses, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
6.
Draft testimony of Roger M. Blond, Division of Risk Analyses, Office of-Nuclear Regulatory Research.
7.
Draft: testimony of Richard Codell,' Senior Hydraulic Engineer, Hydrologic and Geotechnical Engineering Branch, Division ~of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
8.
Draft testimony of Benjamin Bookbinder, Chief, Transportation and Materials Risk Branch, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
9.
Draft testimony of Dr. Robert J. Budnitz, Future Resources Associates, Berkeley, California.
10.
Draft testimony of Jack W. Hickman, Supervisor, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems Safety Division, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
11.
Draft testimony of Mr. Gregory Kolb, Member of Technical Staff, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems Safety Division, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
-.n-.
..