ML20028E676
| ML20028E676 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1982 |
| From: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028E670 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301280111 | |
| Download: ML20028E676 (2) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _
e e
GPU Nuclear NUC1Mr P.O. Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 609-693-6000 Writer's Direct Dial Number:
December 30, 1982 Mr. Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406
Dear Mr. Starostecki:
Subj ect: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 Inspection Report No. 50-219/82-25 This letter is submitted in response to your letter of November 29, 1982, regarding the findings of the routine inspection conducted by Messrs. Cowgill and Thomas on October 7 - November 11, 1982.
Pursua ' to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, attached is our response to the violatit,n identified in Appendix A of your correspondence.
If there are any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact me or Mr. Michael Laggart of my staf f at (609) 971-4643.
Very truly yours, k
Peter B. Fiedler Vice President and Director Oyster Creek PBF:RPJ:1se Attachments cc:
Mr. Ronald C. Haynes, Administrator Rec, ion I U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6.,1 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station l
Forked River, NJ 08731 8301200111 830121 PDR ADOCK 05000219 G
PDR GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Public Utilities Systern
e.
.e 6
l ATTACHMENT The following information provides a response to the " Notice of Violation" identified in the US NRC letter dated November 29, 1982.
Violation Technical Specification 6.8.1 and Procedure 122, Revision 13, July 16, 1982, Security Guidelines for Plant Personnel, require that visitors be continuously escorted and observed when in the protected area.
Contrary to the above, on October 28, 1982, at about 2:00 p.m., a visitor was lef t unescorted in an of fice within the protected area.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement III).
Response
We concur with the violation as stated.
t Immediate corrective action taken was to provide an authorized escort for the visitor upon being notified by the inspector who observed the incident.
Follow-up corrective action was also taken:
(1) On November 5,1982, a notice appeared in the Oyster Creek INF0/ UPDATE (a newsletter published for plant personnel), emphasizing the necessity of accompanying visitors at all times.
(2) On November 18, 1982, a memorandum was sent f rom the Security Supervisor to all. site protection personnel instructing them to make sure that all persa.inel signing the escort form read and understand the section of the form which relates to keeping the visitor under l
surveillance at all times.
l l
(3) On November 22, 1982, a memorandum was sent by the Security Supervisor to the Security Training Supervisor at Oyster Creek requesting that security orientation instructors place emphasis on the escort responsibilities at training sessions.
We believe that these corrective actions are suf ficient to prevent future violations of this nature.
Full compliance was achieved with the implementation of our immediate corrective action on October 28, 1982.
___