ML20028E469
| ML20028E469 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 01/20/1983 |
| From: | Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301270002 | |
| Download: ML20028E469 (3) | |
Text
.
i DISTRIBUTION: Gray File IE-Harmon & Jordan g
Dec$etFile DEisenhut ACRS-10 NRC POR SHorris Q
L PDR SMacKay ORB #2 Rdg 0 ELD hb LO. b oES Docket llos.50-32h N
O' l
/
and 50-324 0 1933 P
!!r. E. E. Utley Executive Vice President Carolina Power a Light Company P. O. Box 551 27602 Raleigh, ilurth Caxilina
Dear !!r. Utley:
SUBJECT:
LICEllSE ASENDf!ENT REQUEST FOR SPEllT FUEL POOL EXPANSION RE: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 and 2
.We have reviewed your submittal dated September 16, 1982 which pro-vided supplemental infomation concerning the subject request.. lie find that we need additional information before we.can complete our review. This-information, which is. listed in the enclosure to this letter was discussed with your staff on January 17,.1983..Please be advised that we will need 30 days after receipt of the information to conplete our review and process the license amendment.
The repctting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained.in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OliB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Sincerely, s
B'I ORICILg gic Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2,
Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Infomation cc w/ enclosure:
See next page 8301270002 830120 PDR ADOCK 05000324 P
pop N
.IYM d
ORB #2:0L ORB #2:DL C-BR3#2:DL l
-omce>
l w~e >
i
...'.129.83..........'M.8 3..
112L83......
a, >
1,Nac.mau sis co-aomncu eno OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uso m i i_ m oea
.a
Mr. E. E. Utley Carolina Power & Light Company cc:
Richard E. Jones,' Esquire Carolina Power & Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 George F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Mr. Charles R. Dietz Plant Manager P. O. Box 458 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Mr. Franky Thomas, Chairman Board of Comr.issioners P. O. Box 249 Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Mrs. Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse Budget & Management 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency t
Region IV Office Regional Radiation Representative 345 Courtland Street, N. W.
l Atlanta, Georgia 30308 I
l Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'! c P. O. Box 1057 Southport, North Carolina 28461 l
James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 :1arietta Street, Suite 3100 i
l Atlanta, Georgia 30303 l
l
cue
'.\\.,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a
Es
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20586
'+9.....,e JAN 2 01963 Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 Mr. E. E. Utley Executive Vice President Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Utle :
'\\
SUBJECT:
LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR SPENT FUEL POOL EXPANSION RE:
Brunswick St am Electric Plant Units 1 and 2
\\
We have reviewed your submittal dated September 16, 1982 which pro-vided supplemental information concerning the subject request. We find that we need additional information before we can complete our.
review. This informati'on, which is listed in the enclosure to this letter was discussed with your staff on January 17, 1983.
Please be.
\\
advised that we will need 30 days after receipt of the information to complete our review and process the license amendment.
A The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Donlegic B. Vassallo, Chief' Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
. Enclosure SPENT FUEL POOL EXPANSION LICENSE AMEPOMENT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (1) Provide sufficient information to demonstrate th&Pthe free-standing racks mounted on the free-standing pedestals are conservatively stable for all postulated loading conditions. To that end,:the' analysis for sliding and tiping should account for rack / fuel dynamic effects, dynamic rather than static vertical accelerations, the potential for rotation of the racks about the vertical axis, and the fact that the racks are mounted on free-standing pedestals.
(2) Provide sufficient information to demonstrate that leveling of the racks will not be a problem.
(3) Provide an analysis for upward loads on the rack (downward on the handling gear) to assure that a stuck fuel assembly will not cause unacceptable consequences.
(4) Provide sufficient information to demonstrate for the new loads the adequacy of the existing pre-stressed concrete girders which support the fuel pool.
(S) Your analysis of the criticality of. the spent fuel storage pool con-sidered the storage of BWR fuel bundles having a maximum multipli-cation factor (K=) of 1.35 in the new high density storage locations.
If it is intended that this type of fuel may be stored in the old low density storage locations, then M,how that for the most reactive configuration, the multiplication factor (Keff) for the entire fuel storage pool would be less than 0.95.
If this type of fuel will not be permitted in low density storage locations, show that adequate precautions will be taken to prevent inadvertent storage of this fuel (K==1.35) in the low density storage locations.
1 V
..m-
,.,-~.
-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,