ML20028C354

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 82-163/03L-0:on 821129,temp Switches 1E31/N612A & B & Temp Differential Switches 1E31/N613A & B Found Out of Allowable Tolerance.Caused by Inconsistency in Procedure for Calibr Temp Switches.Procedure Revised & Switches Recalibr
ML20028C354
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1982
From: Masterson V
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20028C344 List:
References
LER-82-163-03L, LER-82-163-3L, NUDOCS 8301070378
Download: ML20028C354 (3)


Text

.

q

On.rROt stoCx: I, l 1 I I I I@ (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE A!JL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

., 1 IL lL lS lC l1 lg 0l0l-l0l0l0j0 l0 14 15 uCENSE NUMBER

}- l 0 l 0 lgl 4l 1 J 0 l 0 I O gl

5 26 LaCENSE TYPE 40 l

S7 CAT Sa g

3 3 LICENSEE CCOE

~

j ' 'C " , l'L @l0l5l0101013l7I3 @l68 1l69112EVENT jy,e I 9 DATE I 8 l 2 @l 74 175 l 2 REPORT l 2 !7D ATE18 1280]@

4 6o 61 DOCKET NWM8ER EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBA8LE CONSECUENCES h i: l l On November 29. 1982 during the performance of LIS-RI-03, temperature switches l

, 3; j lE31-N612A, lE31-N612B and temperature differential switches lE31-Nol3A, lE31-N613B l 3 ,,; j were found to be out of allowable tolerance in the non-conservative direction. The g

., ,3; y affected temperature switches were immediately re-calibrated within allowable  ;

l g ,g ; y tolerances and technical specification 3.3.'2 wa9 satisfied. Safety and health of the g public was not affected. g

7; ;

1

ial l ao s9 con *. VALVE SYSTEM CAUSE CAUSE CODE CODE SUSCCOE COMPCNENT CODE SusCODE SUSGoDE

': i9l 9

l Cl El@ Wh l Zlh lIlh lS lT lR l Ulh yh Wh to 11 12 13 18 5.9 20 a

SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT MEvtscos EVENTYEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE N O.

@ REgg LER/RO

,, l218 22l2 l l-l 23 l 1l 6l 3l 24 ;6 l/]

27 l0l3l 28 29 W

30 l

31

! l0 l 32 T HOURS 22 $8 i PCR US. PL MA F CTU EM N C C lsaE lgl24c lg O P lasZ ig M ET s

Z le l@

l0l0l0l 37 4o l lY 45 l@ Wg l Z l@

42 42 l Z l9 l9 l9lg 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS iail Cause appears to be inconsistencies in procedure for calibrating temperature switches. I 1 ,,jl Procedure was revised correcting any vague ambiguous steps in the surveillance. All I l ,,j; instruments are being re-calibrated and AIR (1-82-589) written to trend instruments l

,,;y for any instrument drift occu'rrences. I l

i4 II 30

, 8 9

% PCWER QTHER STATUS Di RY OtSCOVERY QESCRFr10N ST NA ( LIS-RI-03 l i 5 l l B l@ l 0 l 4 l 8'*l@l"

lB l@l

AETiviTY CoSTtNT LOCATION OF RELEASE RE'.E ASED CP RELE ASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY l1 16I s 9 W h lZlgl to si NA 44 l l as NA so l

PERSONNEL EXPCSURES NUMSER 39 NA l i t l 7 l l 0 l 0 l0 lhl TYPE lhl DESCRIPTION **

I PER5oNNEL inau'dits NUUSER DESCRtPTION NA l.

11 la8l 9l 0 l 0 l0 l@l12 11 30 l LCSS OP OR CAM ACE TO P ACILITY  %,,/

h TYVE DE SCRIPTION .

.l

'1 ISI 8 8 U hl 'O m

8301070378 821227 p

PDR ADOCK 05000373 NRC USE ONLY ,

issut oE CRi* Tion @ S PDR g [ ; ; ; ; y 9 , 9 g , , g ;:

1 1c1 l N l NA 68 69 30. ;

8 9 to -

c

[

V. Fbsterson 357-6761 I

PMCNE: g NAV@ QF po@* ARER

I. LER NUMBER: 82-163/03L-0 II. LASALLE COUNTY STATION: Unit One III. DOCKET NUMBER: 050-173 IV. EVENT DESCRIPTION:

Od November 29, 1982 during the performance of LIS-RI-03, "RCIC Pipe routing area high temperature and high vent differential temperature isolation calibration and functional test," temperature switches 1E31-N612A and lE31-N612B and temperature differential switches 1E31-N613A and 1E31-N613B were found out of tolerance in the non-conservative direction.

Technical Specification L.C.O. 3.3.2 isolation actuation instrumentation allowable valve setpoint for the above temperature switches and differ-ential temperature switches was exceeded. ,

V. PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES:

At the time of discovering the out of allowable tolerance temperature switches the reactor was at 48% power with the mode switch in run.

There are 2 ambient temperature switches and 2 temperature differential switches located in the RCIC pipe routing area. One temperature switch and one temperature differential switch comprise one channel. Technical Specificiation 3.3.7 requires one channel to be operating in conditions 1, 2, and 3. With less than one channel operable, a channel must be placed in the tripped condition within one hour. Tripping a channel would have closed the steam line isolation valve to the RCIC turbine rendering RCIC inoperable.

With the RCIC system inoperable plant operation can still continue with the HPCS system operable as adequate core cooling is still assured as defined in the Technical Specifications limiting condition for operation j 3.7.3 and the bases 7.3. At the time of the occurrence the HPCS system was operable.

I After discovery of the affected temperature switches reading approximately l 7 F above allowable tolerance, both channels were immediately calibrated back into allowable tolerance within one hour. This satisfied Technical Specification 3.3.2 and subsequently the channels were not tripped.

As an added precaution all LIS procedures for calibrating temperature and differential temperature switches for leak detection are being per-formed.

l l

l Plant operation continued without interruption and the health and safety of the public was not affected.

VI. CAUSE:

l A possible cause of instruments 1E31-N612A, lE31-N612B, lE31-N613A, and lE31-N613B being out of tolerance might be due in part to minor incon-

7

. ~

  • J pistencies by maintenance personnel in calibrating the instruments. The procedure used originally appears to be a possible cause as it was not clearly defined as to whether the instrument was to be calibrated to the i temperature indication for the instrument which has its own calibrated I frequency or whether a DC Millivolt was to be used.

Ambient Temperature compensation of the DC Millivolt source if required and if not taken into consideration would also cause the instruments to read high when adjusted to the Millivolt source.

The surveillance for these instruments (LIS-RI-03) is a quarterly surveillance. The procedure has been revised as of October 15,1982 correcting any ambiguity that existed Previously.

Since the instruments where calibrated per the procedure prior to the Revision of October (Rev. 2), this would appear to explain the cause of the instruments being out of allowable tolerance. Once again, this appears to be a problem with the previous surveillance procedure.

VI. CORRECTIVE ACTION:

Upon discovery of the temperature switches being out of tolerance, the affected instruments were immediately readjusted and returned within allowable tolerance within one hour. As an additional corrective measure all LIS procedures for calibrating temperature switches were repeated to confirm setpoints within limits.

The procedure for the surveillance has been revised and does not exhibit the problems with vagueness that the procedure prior to the revision had. Trip setpoints have also been lowered in the conserva-tive direction to minimize the likelihood of a similar occurrence from happening. Trending is being performed AIR (1-82-589) on the instru-ments to determine whether there is an actual instrument drift occurring i or whether it was just a problem with the surveillance procedure.

Prepared by: Vincent Masterson

)