ML20027E661
| ML20027E661 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Vogtle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 07/19/1982 |
| From: | Robert Lewis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Kelly R GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027E634 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8211150583 | |
| Download: ML20027E661 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000321/1982018
Text
l
'
.
neob
'
o
UNITED STATES
y
9,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- !
1
REGION il
0FFICIAL RECORD
"
$
M1 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3 00
h,
8
COPY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
,
JUL 191982
' Georgia Power Company
ATTN: Mr. R. J. Kelly
Executive Vice President
P. O. Box 4545
Atlanta, GA 30302
Gentlemen:
Subject: Report Nos. Q 321/82 % 50-366/82-18, 50-424/82-14 and 50-425/82-14
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Board Reports
.,
for Your Hatch and Vogtle Plants
The NRC SALP Board met on September 11, 1981 to evaluate the performance of the
subject facilities for the period July 1,1980 through June 30, 1981.
The
results of this meeting are documented in the enclosed SALP Board Report. This
evaluation was discussed with you at your offices in Atlanta on October 14, 1981.
As you are aware, the NRC has changed the policy for the conduct of the SALP
program based on our experiences during the previous SALP review process and the
continued regionalization of the NRC staff.
These policy changes were made
following the publication of the first SALP Report.
The review of the SALP
program resulted in process and methodology changes and caused a substantial
delay in the issuance of this report.
Revisions to the SALP process have been completed.
Future SALP evaluations and
issuance of annual reports will be forthcoming on a timely basis.
This report
is the product of the revised policy.
It was prepared in the transition period
between the old and the new SALP programs and accordingly is different from the
previous SALP Report and will be different from future SALP Reports.
The performance of your Hatch facility was evaluated in the following functional
plant ' operations; refueling operations; maintenance; surveillance and
areas:
inservice testing; personnel, training and plant procedures; fire protection and
housekeeping; design changes and modifications; radiation protection, radioactive
waste management and transportation; environmental protection; security and
safeguards; audits, reviews, and committee activities; administrative, QA, and
. records; and corrective actions and reporting.
The performance of your Vogtle facility was evaluated in the following functional
areas:
containment structure; piping and hangers; safety-related components;
corrective actions and reporting; and procurement.
The SALP Board evaluation process consists of categorizing performance in each
functional area.
The categories which we have used to evaluate the performance
of your facilities are defined in section II of the enclosed SALP Board report.
f B211150583 821014
- PDR ADOCK 05000321
G
_
,
.
_
_
_.
.is
.
,
..
,k
.e
.
"
y
1,
3, ' 'h
JUL.191982
'
, ) Georgia Power Cerr.pany
2 >.,.
..
,
/
Any comments which you may have concerning our evaluation of the performance of
your facilities should be, submitted to this office within twenty days of the date
of this letter.
As you are aware, this report was delayed for the reasons
identified above.
Acc9rdingly if you wish to delay your response beyond the 20
.
,
d
day period, an extension of the period would be _ agreeable to us.
Please inform
j
us of your plans in this regard.
'
4<
Your comments, if any, and the SALP Board Report, will both appear as enclosures
to the Region II Administrator's letter which issues the SALP Report as an NRC
Report.
In addition to the issuance of the report, this letter will, if
.
appropriate, state the NRC position on matters relating to the status of your
,
safety programs.
Comments which you may submit at your, option, are not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
,n,
'y
'
Should you have any questions concerni4 this letter, we will be glad to discuss
9
them with you.
I
-
iS ncerely,
h l.
8
1'
i
<
g
R. C. Lewir, Director
'
'
Division oftProject and
T
Resident' Programs
'
Region II SALP Board Chairman
'
.,
Enclosure:
SALP Board Report for -
Georgia Power Company
cc w/ encl:
,
H. C. Nix, Plant Manager, Hatch
M. Manry, Plant Manager, Vogtle
s
cc w/o encl:
J.. T. Beckham, Vice President and
General Manager-Nuclear Generation
C. E. 9elflower,'l Site QA Supervisor
,
,^
H. H. Gregory, KII, Construction Project Manager
' t, E. D. Groover, Q/vSite Supervisor
D. 0., Foster, Pr6 ject General Manager
l
bcc w/ encl:
i
?"
NRC Re:ident Inspector
,
J. M. Grant, NRR
M. B. Fairtile, NRR
s
'Hugh S. Jordan, Executive Secretary
State of Georgia
/
Document Management Branc
/
t i
,
'
RII
RIL
R
I
,_SII
A4
'4s
4
"
JKRausch:ejw fSinkule JRogge
VBrown e HDance #J013
k1
7//s /82
7//S /82
7/ /82
7/ /82
7/ /82- 7/P/82