ML20027D308

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Safeguards Insp Repts 50-254/82-20 & 50-265/82-21 on 820927-1001 & Notice of Violation.Notice of Violation & Rept Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20027D308
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/29/1982
From: John Miller
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20027D309 List:
References
NUDOCS 8211040102
Download: ML20027D308 (2)


See also: IR 05000254/1982020

Text

. .-

. - -

. - .

S

i

i

e

l

OCT 2 01982

4

1

Docket No. 50-254

Docket No. 50-265

j

Commonwealth Edison Company

j

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

',

Post Office Box 767

1

Chicago, IL 60690

i

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Messrs.

T. J. Madeda and B. W. Stapleton of this office on September 27 through

October 1, 1982, of activities at The Quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station,

Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-29 and

No. DPR-30 and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. N. Kalivianakis

and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and in-

terviews with personnel.

i,

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-

compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.

)

A written response is required.

'

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is

exempt from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2), Part 73, Title 10,

Code of Federal Regulations. This information must be handled and protected

in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.

Consequently, the enclo-

sure to this letter, our report of this inspection, and your response to the

l

noncompliance identified in the enclosure to this letter will not be placed

in the Public Document Room. Therefore, your statement of corrective action

regarding the noncompliance identified in the enclosure should be submitted

'

as a separate enclosure to your transmittal letter in the manner prescribed.

.

Enclosuro Contains

"FE00APDS N: FORMATION

DM3i

W a Separation This

y ,

,3

~

PaSa is Deccatrolled

K Ohh

PDR

.

_ _ _ _

_

. , _ _

. . _ .

__

_

..

.

.

_ _ _ , _ ___ __

_ _ .._.

-

O

j

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

00T 2 91932

The responses directed by this letter and not subject to the clearance pro-

cedures of the Office of ?!anagement and Budget as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

.Origr.al f,:gace by,J. R. MJg

J. R. Fliller, Chief

Technical Programs Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix, Notice

of Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

No. 50-254/82-20(DETP)

and No. 50-265/82-21(DETP)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORl!ATION)

cc w/encls:

Louis 0. DelGeorge, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

N. Kalivianakis, Plant

Superintendent

IE Files

NB1SS/SGPL

NRR/DL/SSPB

IE/DRP/ORPB

cc w/ encl, w/o UNCLASSIFIED

SAFEGUARDS INFOR>fATION:

D}!B/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

Karen Borgstadt, Office of

Assistant Attorney General

<!

y

RIII

RIII

RIIIg

RII'I

RIII

falker%!

d/lII er

fY

f

[s,jo

//

Fla edf v

Stqp

/ev' Creed

/}

10/25/82

/

I"'

I t/')S[@

f

,

uiy

l