ML20027C915

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Addl Response to FOIA Request for Correspondence Between Nuclear Assurance Corp & NRC Re 1982 Fuel Shipments.Forwards Documents Listed in App A.App B Documents Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 3)
ML20027C915
Person / Time
Site: 07001510
Issue date: 09/23/1982
From: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Resnikoff M
COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC PRIORITIES
Shared Package
ML20027A763 List:
References
FOIA-82-332 NUDOCS 8210270423
Download: ML20027C915 (3)


Text

4 900 6 j## "%

UNITED STATES h.

", j, e

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e

S,eptember 23, 1982 Mr. Marvin Resnikoff Project Director Council on Economic Priorities 84 Fifth Avenue IN RESPONSE REFER New York, NY 10011 TO F0IA-82-332

Dear Mr. Resnikoff:

This is in further response to your letter dated June 23, which was received in our office June 27, 1982, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, correspondence between Nuclear Assurance Corporation (NAC) and the NRC regarding 1982 irradiated fuel shipments between Chalk River, Ontario, and Savannah River, South Carolina.

Appendix A is a list of documents subject to your request.

Copies of these documents are enclosed in their entirety.

Appendix B is a list of documents which contain unclassified safeguards informati on.

The statutory authority for withholding this information is found in Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2167).

This information is being withheld from public disclosure ursuant to exemption (3) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b (3)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(3) of the Comission's regulations.

Copies of the non-exempt portions of these documents are enclosed.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulation, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest.

The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. John G. Davis, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

This denial may be appealed to the Commission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.

As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."

This completes NRC's action on your request.

Si cerely, M.

Iton, Director 8210270423 820923 sion of p s and Reco ds r

PDR FOIA Office of Administration RESNIMD82-332 PDR

Enclosures:

As stated

y*

RE:FOIA-332 APPENDIX A 1.

Letter to Director, Region I, NRC, from F. L. Danese, NAC, June 16, 1982.

2.

Letter to Charles Hillman, Division of Safeguards, NRC, from F.L. Danese, August 17, 1982.

1 I

i

p

~' \\

Re:

F01A-82-332

,+

1

';m

/

Appendix B x

x,,

1.

Letter to Mr.

F.- L. Danese, NAC, from Theodore S. Sherr, NRC, with route enclosure, April 13,1982.

s 2.

Letter to Mr. F. L. Danese,. NAC, from Theodbre S. Sherr, NAC '.

x'.

with route enclosure, April 14, 1982.

N

/.

3.

Letter to Region I, NRC, from F. L. dane ~ e, NAC,'tiith endlosure',

s June 3, 1982.

's.

4.

Letter to Region I, NRC, from F. L. Dariese, NAC, with'edclosure, August 13, 1982.

~

's.

N.

W I

T

\\

l l

\\

s p

e