ML20027B794
| ML20027B794 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/1982 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8209300149 | |
| Download: ML20027B794 (2) | |
Text
~
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374ol 400 Chestnut Street Tower II September 22, 1982 BLRD-50-438/82-62 BLRD-50-439/82-55 co u
N
--4C U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission co z
Region II Q
g 31 W
i Attn:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator m
hp) 1
^
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 c!'$
y 5
Ol3
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
yr cp b
BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - QA TEST DOCUMENTATION ON RADIARON MONITORING EQUIPMENT BY GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY - BLRD-50-438/82-62, i
BLRD-50-439/82 FIRST INTERIM REPORT The subject deficiency was initially reported to NRC-0IE Inspector F. Cantrell on August 24, 1982 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) as Audit 82V-29, Deficiencies 3 and 4.
Enclosed is our first interim report.
We expect to submit our next report by November 12, 1982.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FIS 858-2688.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 3..
A L. M. Mills, ager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure cc:
Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director (Enclosure)
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.
20555
. n-.
.j e, e."ty:
TG y 8209300149 820922 PDR ADOCK 05000438 S
PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer L
6 ENCLOSURE BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 QA 'IEST DOCUMENTATION ON RADIATION MONITORING EQUIPMENT BY GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY AUDIT 82V-29, DEFICIENCIES 3 AND 4 BLRD-50-438/82-62, BLRD-50-439/82-55 10 CFR 50.55(e)
FIRST INTERIM REPORT Description of Deficiencies General Atomic Company, San Diego, California, supplies radiation monitoring equipment for TVA nuclear plants. During the TVA audit of General Atomic Company, the following deficiencies were noted in the implementation of their previously accepted QA program for TVA contracts:
1.
Deficiency 3 - Contrary to section 11, paragraph 5.3, of General Atomic's QA manual, a test operator did not completely record the test results for a radiation monitor already shipped to Bellefonte.
- 2.. Deficiency 4 - Contrary to ANSI N45.2, section 18, which requires results of inspections to be identifiable and retrievable from records storage, QA records from General Atomic's Cimex facility do not provide for the required identification and retrievability of inspection results.
Interim Progress TVA has contacted General Atomic Company and has requested them to respond with their proposed corrective action. TVA is determining the effect these deficiencies have on the equipment supplied to the other TVA plants.
I l
l l
i l
l l
.