ML20024H102
| ML20024H102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/1991 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024H101 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-01.033, RTR-REGGD-1.033 50-456-91-13, 50-457-91-11, NUDOCS 9105210370 | |
| Download: ML20024H102 (1) | |
Text
_ _ - _ _
~
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Comonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-457 Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station License No. NPF-77 During an NRC inspection conducted from March 10 through April 20, 1991, a violation of an NRC requirement was identified.
in accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1991), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.8 requires, in part, that written procedures for plant operations as recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978, shall be established, implemented, and maintained.
Contrary to the above, on April 17, 1991, the licensee did not correctly implement a written procedure required by Regulatory Guide 1.33, by failing to open the mixed-bed demineralizer outlet valve per step F.1.d of Bw0P CV-8, "CV System itixed Bed / Cation Demineralizer Operation."
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I). No. 50-457/91011-01(DRP)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy a G Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown consideration will be given to extending the response time.
V
.b4b Dated at plen Ellyn, Illinois x
this /OL day of May 1991 W. D. Shafer, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1 9105210370 910510 POR ADOCK 05000436 O
_