ML20024C173

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs Re RCS Temp
ML20024C173
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  
Issue date: 07/06/1983
From:
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20024C170 List:
References
NUDOCS 8307120361
Download: ML20024C173 (9)


Text

- - - _

TABLE 15.2-1 (Continued)

TIME SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR CONDITION II EVENTS Accident Event Time (sec.)

Excessive Load Increase 1.

Manual Reactor Control (fiinimum 10% step load increase 0

Feedback)

Equilibrium conditions reached (approximate cimes only) 200 2.

Manual Reactor Control (Maximum 10% step load increase 0

Feedback)

Equilibrium conditions reached (approximate times only) 100 3.

Automatic Reactor Control (Minimum 10% step load increase 0

Feedback)

Equilibrium conditions reached 200 4.

Automatic Reactor Control (Maximum 10% step load increase 0

Feedback)

Equilibrium conditions reached (approximate times only) 200 8307120361 830706 PDR ADOCK 05000338 P

PDR 15.2-88 6995A:1 51

m 17.537-13 I

1.200 1.175

-a<

g2 1.150

$jlE 1.125 n.

< $ 1.100 m

W2 y o 1.075 m-2 S 1.050 m

E 1.025 [

1.000 620 610 mem><

600 e

E 3

590

~c

$o 580 m

m><

570 wz O

l

'J MO l

l l

l l

550 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 l

TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-33 Excessive Load increase Without Rod Control. Minimum Feedback 85

l i

17.537-14 l

l l

l l

q

$ 2300 w

$ 2200 aw

[ 2100 e

N 2000 E

D E 1900 w

E 1800 74 72 70 u

68 66 64 1.8 x

/

g 1.6 O

l l

l 1.4 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-34 Excessive Load increase Without Rod Control, Minimum Feedback 86

. - _,_=,.,

17.537 15 1.200 l

l l

l l

1.175 a

gz 1.150 W5 g g 1.125 m.

m $ 1.100

<wz go 1.075 m-Z $ 1.050 x

E 1.025 I

1.000 620 E10 gc 3

t-<

600 m

E A

3 590 E

w o E~

580 m

m><

570 m

m O

c2 560 550 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 i

TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-35 Excessive Load increase Without Rod Control, Maximum Feedback 87

17.537-16 2400 l

l l

l l

w 2300 m

D E

2200 C

w I

m ;;; 2100 b

2000 aw m

1900 1800 74 72 g

70 W

4 68 66 64 1.8 1.6 e

cmz O

1.4 i

l I

I I

I i

1.2 O

50 100 150 200

~250 300 TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-36 Excessive Load increase Without Rod Control,Plaximum Feedback 88

i 17,537-17 1.200 l

l l

l l

1.175 g $ 1.150

-5 EO 1.125 Oz u

e 1.100

<a

  • $ 1.075 8P z y 1.050 e

S. 1.025 1.000 620 610 m

m "3

600 c:

E N

3 590

  • C 580 mw><

570

[

w x

0u 560 550 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-37 Excessive Load increase With Rod Control. Minimum Feedback 89

17.537-18 2400 l

l l

l 2300

~

w c

D 2200 \\

m o.

m y 2100 2000 a

w

{

1900 1800 74 72 g;-

70 c.

<3 68 66 64 1.8 l

1.6 I-e mz Q

1.4 l

l l

l l

1.2 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 TIME (SECONDS)

Figure 15.2-38 Excessive Load increase With Rod Control, Minimum Feedback 90

17.537-20 W

2400 m

I l

l l

D m

2300 e*2 05 2200 h

@E B!zm 2100

$w f

2000 74 72 C

70 L

H

<3 68 66 64 1.8 1.6 m

enzQ 1.4 I

1.2 l

l l

l l

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 TIME (SECONDS) l I

Figure 15.2-40 Excessive Load increase With Rod Control. Maximum Feedback 92 l

t

~

O I'.53'.19 1.200 l

l l

l 1.175

<Z 1.150 g

WE

@ j 1.125 n.

e $ 1.100 h 1.075 3 H z @ 1.050 m

E 1.025 1.000 620 610 me D

600 e

N 3

590

~

$c 580 xw><

570 w

m Ou 560 4

550 I

I l

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 TIME (SECONDS) l Figure 15.2-39 Excessive Load increase With Rod Control. Maximum Feedback 91

..