ML20024C124
| ML20024C124 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/07/1983 |
| From: | Chamberlain D, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024C120 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900507 NUDOCS 8307120284 | |
| Download: ML20024C124 (19) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:* ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION N0.- 99900507/83-01 DATE(S) 3/28 4/1/83 ON-SITE HOURS-o3 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Sargent & Lundy Engineers ATTN: Mr. R. W. Patterson Senior Partner 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. H. S. Taylor, Head, Quality Assurance Division TELEPHONE NUMBER: (312)269-6371 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Architect engineering services. NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Sargent & Lundy (S&L) is the architect engineer on nine nuclear power plant units that are in the design and/or construction phase and has minor involvement at one nuclear plant that is under construction. S&L - is also engaged in modification, repair, or service contracts on 12 operating nuclear power plants. h, fb [-[-83 ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: D. D. (Chamberlain, Reactor Systems Section (RSS) Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S): P. M. Sears, RSS; D. Terao, Mechanical Engineering Branch; R. Lipinski, St uctural Engineering Branch; L. Kintner, APPROVED BY: 7, f [o/7/[2 C.J.Haj'l Chief, RSS Date ' TNSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE: A. BASES: S&L Topical Report No. SL-TR-1A and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. B. SCOPE: Status of previous inspection findings and the following specific items: (1) NRC Region III request for a review of the seismic design of the main steam line from the outboard containment isolation valve to the turbine stop valves (Zimmer); (2) Review of S&L methods for consideration of local pipe stresses induced by pipe clamps attachments; (3) 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) Report (Zimmer) stating that S&L did not adequately (Cont, on next page) PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: , 50-373/374, 50-454/455, 50-456/457, 50-461/462, and 5 6/ "ICSC":D C2IGIEL - A f\\ fl e I, Certified By lGLOd M A L U A L8 tN 8307120284 830609 [ h O
ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPECTION N0.: 99900507/83-01 RESULTS: PAGE 2 of 6 SCOPE: (Cont.) translate applicable electrical separation criteria into the installation specifications and/or drawings; and (4) 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) Report (Clinton) regarding improperly tightened jam nuts on structural steel expansion connections. A. VIOLATIONS: None B. NONCONFORMANCES: None C. UNRESOLVED ITEMS: It is not apparent that S&L is in compliance with Section NB-3672.7 of the ASME Code which states, in part, "Where assumptions are used in calculations or model tests, the likelihood of underestimates of forces, moments, and stresses, including the effect of stress intensification, shall be evaluated." For a certain clamp and support in the 100K category, S&L has not performed a formal evaluation of the effect of clamp induced local pipe stresses in their stress analysis, relying on experience and engineering judgement that excessive stresses do not exist. D. STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS: 1. (Closed) Nonconformance (82-02): Design Document Changes (DDCs) are not being incorporated into the affected design document within the specified 2-month time period (Zimmer). l S&L has conducted a review of the DDC status report and identified all l DDC's that have not been incorporated on the affected design document. l The present schedule will complete the backlog of DDC incorporation by April 30, 1983. Also, the new DDC status report data base allows for a listing of DDC's that are due for incorporation which provides I a constant tracking system to prevent recurrence of this nonconformance. l 2. (Closed) Nonconformance (82-02): DDC status reports were not being l maintained with latest information (Zimmer). l
ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPECTION N0. : 99900507/83-01 RESULTS: PAGE 3 of 6 A listing of all DDC numbers for which S&L did not have a copy of the DDC was given to the licensee and a copy of the DDC was obtained or the DDC status log was revised to indicate the DDC number was not to be used. The DDC status report has also been compared with the DDC files at S8' and the current status for all DDC's was incorporated. Also, Proje t Instruction PI-ZI-2,1 was revised to require a review every 4 mon hs to assure that all DDC's have been received by S&L. 3. (Closed) Nor. :onformance (82-02): Cable tray routing point weight calculations ' ailed to consider the weight of the cable trays as required to ot tain the total tray support loading (Zimmer). Revised calculas 'ons were performed for all tray points down to points - with a design int 'x of zero (design index of 1.25 is equivalent to approximately 50 t'rcent fill). The revised calculations included the cables, tray, and t'her appurtenances for a comparision of the calculated weight against the 40 pound per square foot (psf) limit and 14 tray points were identified as possible problem areas. These 14 points were analyzed by the structural departnerit and no design or installation changes were required. Also, the wording in the FSAR and the applicable project instruction was revised to clearly indicate that the 40 psf design base limit includes the weight of the cable, cable tray and all appurtenances and any tray points that exceed the 40 psf limit must be submitted to the structural department for a detailed analysis of the support system adequacy. The NRC inspector reviewed the calculations that were performed in order to evaluate the S&L process of using a design index of 1.25 to require the performance of a weight calculation. This review revealed that no points at or below a design index of 1.25 exceeded the 40 psf base l design criteria weight limit and it is concluded that the process now l being used by S&L is conservative. However, S&L management stated that the cable routing computer information system data bases for all projects l are being modified to provide an automatic weight calculation for all points and a check against the allowed weight limit. All projects l except Zimmer and La Salle now have tnis capability. This area of concern from the 82-02 inspection is considered closed.
ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99900507/83-01 RESULTS: PAGE 4 of 6 E. OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS: 1. Main Steam Line Design (Zimmer Project) - This area of inspection resulted from an NRC Region III request for NRR to evaluate the S&L design calculations regarding the seismic design of the main steam lines in the turbine building (continuation of 82-02 inspection). The main steam lines from the outboard containment isolation valves to the main turbine stop valves should be designed to withstand the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) and remain functional (Regulatory Guide 1.29, Revision 1; FSAR Chapter 30; and FSAR, Appendix C). The areas reviewed during this inspection included structural informa-l tion provided by S&L regarding the ability of the turbine building I structure to protect and support the main steam line during the SSE l and mechanical information regarding the consequences of a pipe whip resulting from a break of the main feedwater line. The information provided during this inspection and during subsequent telephone conversations is being evaluated by NRR and the final conclusion regarding the implementation of FSAR commitments in this area will be reported when the NRR evaluation is completed. A review of the other S&L projects revealed that La Salle is the only other project for which S&L has responsibility for the seismic design / protection of the main steam line within the turbine building. Upon completion of the evaluation of the Zimmer design, potential impact relative to La Salle will be evaluated. 2. S&L Pipe Design Activities - This area of inspection was conducted in conjunction with an engineer from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Mechanical Engineering Branch. The purpose of the inspec-tion was to obtain information relative to a concern that pipe designers have not taken into account the local effects of preloaded pipe clamps in their pipe stress analyses. Stress analysis procedures for balance of plant (B0P) piping on La Salle were reviewed. It was determined that three pipe supports with pre-loaded pipe clamps were being used on each unit of La Salle. It was ascertained that two of the three preloaded clamps were no problem because they are installed on heavy valve bodies. The third preloaded 1
~ ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPEL110N h0.: 99900507/83-01 RESULTS:
- PAGE 5 of 6 clamp, however, is installed on an elbow of a 20-inch diameter line and is of concern.
To prevent gapping between the pipe and the clamp during seismic and other dynamic loadings the clamp is heavily pre-loaded after being fitted to the pipe (accounting for manufacturing tolerances and the toroidal shape of the elbow). The preload is introduced by torqueing the bolts of the clamp. The preload is then locked in with lock nuts. S&L indicated that stress analysis for the pipe clamp of concern would be completed by June 1, 1983. This item is considered unresolved (see Section C). 3. Electrical Separation Requirements (Zimmer Project) - This area of inspection resulted from a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report which stated that the S&L installation specification did not contain adequate electrical separation criteria and consequently that certain saparation criteria were not being met. This area was reviewed during a previous NRC Inspection (Report No. 99900507/82-02) and remained open for further review of the S&L design process with regard to electrical separation on other projects and to complete the evaluation of action taken on the Zimmer Project. The results of the review for each project were as follows: (a) Zimmer - S&L hcs developed a design drawing which represents the physical separation requirements for current and future installation to be acceptable without analysis. This drawing has been provided to the constructor for additional clarification of the installation specification requirements. Also, numerous inspections, walkdowrs and analyses are being performeo by S&L and the licensee to assure that the present installation meets the separation requirements. Zimmer project was unique at S&L l in that the conduit support drawings were not dimensioned by l S&L (field routed). The additional information provided to the constructor and the planned inspections, walkdowns, and analyses should provide added assurance that the separation requirements are being implemented. l 1 l l
ORGANIZATION: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT INSPECTION N0.: 99900507/83-01 RESULTS: PAGE 6 of 6 (b) Other Projects - S&L dimensions the electrical drawings on all other projects and provides installation tolerances to the con-structor. The design reviews by S&L include a check for electrical separation requirements. Some limited walkdowns are performed to assure that the installation tolerances do not cause a separa-tion requirement to be violated. Based on the actions taken by S&L on Zimmer and the programs in place on Zimmer and other projects, this item is considered closed.
- However, a documentation review of the inspections, walkdowns, and analyses performed on Zimmer will be conducted during a future NRC inspection to assure program implementation.
4. Improperly Tightened Jam Nuts on Bolted Expansion Connections - Region III requested Region IV to inspect matters relating to structural steel detail notes concerning jam nuts on S&L structural drawings at both La Salle and Clinton sites. Further, Region III requested RIV pursue this matter to assure that S&L structural practices are not resulting in drawing note ambiguities at other sites where S&L has lead design responsibility. Findings in this matter are as follows: (a) La Salle - S&L has approved by letter dated February 24, 1983, a quality control procedure clarifying and delineating minimum and maximum bolt tensions for both the high strength nut and the jam nut for bolted expansion joints. (b) Clinton - S&L through Engineering Change Notices 3031, 3082, 3178, l and 3181 has changed all notes on drawings pertaining to l Jam nuts on bolted expansion connections thus clarifying the l matter at Clinton. (c) Byron /Braidwood - S&L has changed all notes on drawings to clarify the designers intent pertaining to expansion connections at Byron /Braidwood. l (d) Zimmer, Fermi, and Marble Hill - S&L has committed to change the l notes on drawings pertaining to expansion connections to preclude any misunderstanding due to ambiguous notes. The NRC inspector has verified that these changes were made. No nonconformances or unresolved items were identified. This is is considered closed at S&L.
Inspector D, CHAM 8ERLAlW y, y y,- Scope / Module 6L66.TglCAL 56PARATlob/ DOCUMENTS EXAMINED i 9990050 7,i e 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 1 3 WH2-EPP-7 DE51$M REVl6tl 0F ELECTRICAL PHYSICA L 12-2 7-82 REV.1 SEPARilT10N S0PPL&rt')ENTING PI-2I-18.1 2 3 WH2 - EPP-9 IN STALL ATI6N REVIEvJ oF cABL&S IN AlR 1 8 3 R6ti. 0 3 3 PI IS. I DESIGN R69t&W 0F PHYSICAL StPARATooN 0f 11-2 4 - % 2 REV.2 m6CH ANtCAL. EL6CTRicAl.. AND INSTR 0mENTATubH EQUIPvtlEH1 k 0 LUFi t - EPP 'I AssociAT60 CA6LL ROUTING R6 VIED BY EPED 10 % 2 5 3 teue'-EPP-S cA6LE ANAL 4 SIS FOR cA6LES IH AIR AND PAHEL DRAFT (, 3 WH2-EPP-6 NON-1E RSSOCIATED CA6L6 ANALYSIS AHD 10-12-8Z REV. 0 l R00 TING REVl6M/ l ,7 3 WH 2 - EPP-11 pro &E00RE FOR Docorit&NTIH&, PRocESSIHG AND 3 G REtl. 0 RESOLtisNG AfPAREnT s6fARATron AnD s6C,REGATrea wr&RAtrios Y> 8
- FoRet)
A IHIS-P642 (SArt\\PL6 CA8L6 IN AIR R&tlitW ) 3 T3 9 1T 21mMER CA8L6S 96R DRAWrHG TA60LATsubi 3 -2R-82 10 {> 56GREGRTl0N VIOLATr0N CH W1R\\HG D1AGRAMS 12-14-82 1I S QCPT-b- A cABLL ANALisIs 7-2-92 12 S DESIGN CRIT 6RIA DC-M6-JO-cP PHYSICAL SEPARATIDH 0F 3-2T-83 R6tl, 3 ft16cilhNichL, EL6CTRICAL AND lHSTRottlENTATIoH 6(Quiftflft1T Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number; - 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicabld d h i
Inspector D. O/AM66RL41N ke N,' ' Scepa/ Module ELECTRICAL 5696RATioW DOCUMENTS EXAMINED i 9770080 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 I3 3 PT-cP- 048 8dvlEW 0F 569ARATIoa oF cA6LL 3RAf7 Rbl, o TERMtNArron S ro E00lPMENT ]4 6 F DS8 - 129 CABL6 SNARATibH CRIT 6RJA VIOLATI0H(Cscd ll-2C-Wo REQUEST AR EnfrInfERIH(r APPRoVA L 15 EriST 6L6CTRicAL DRAWIrtb DESIGN & Rftit6W Gdt06S 1-7-81 foR EL6CTRlChl iHSTALI ATIod DRAW lNGS 16 3 f'I 'cP-034 ra1ERAcTier4 ANALYSIS 4 ff2 96 V.1 17 3 R6P-L Docori,ENTATtou of CABL6. SEPARATibu CRITERIA 1 25-83 66V. 0 1/l0LATI0MS 'I% 3 BSP-7 SEPARATrord cRrTER1ord - USF of Isolation D!titCES l 8~3 Plv. 0 i l i i Document Types: Columns: l. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number - 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicabic
Inspector D. [kANb36 k A N y {lo. g Sccpe/ Module STATUS 'of PRtvl0VS DOCUMENTS EXAMINED I Ia5PLCTION f1NDlHGS 94]00507, e 1 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 .l. 6 thfCHAnlcAL otS1bt4 DocornEHT CHANGE STATUS REPORT 3/11/13 2 8 DtSI&n cMANG6 DoCVM6 HTS STATUS REPORT (DRAFT) 3/LCR3 3 3 PI 2.I PR6PARATIDM AND REVIL10 AND APPRo1/AL of 3/2V53 REV.17 \\ _DLSIGN 00C0mEHT cHAn&E NOTICES 4 8 DisIGu cnAnGE Docomsnr5 (elscTRicAU.STATos' RtPoR7(ottrO 3/30A3 5 7 sLC-23258 D mECHAnscAL DOC'S kND PS DLR 'S NOT AT hl2l%2 SARGENT k LvHDY b 1 SLF-706 RFSP0 HSE To SLC - 23758 D lho/83 1 7 SLC-13SK3D D6sIGu nocorn6nT cMANG6 (DOC) %/27/82 '8 G R6vl6vJ OF ODC's - srgocr0RAL S/sb/83 9 L DOC's AHO PS DCR 'S NOT DISPOS 6D tolTriln MINGTY DAY W2TA3 Ttml L1Mf 7 - rA6CHAMic AL 16 3 PI 10.1 RESOLUTioH 0F D6SI(rN IHDE)CES EXCEEDING l.25 V7/53 Reil. 4 FoR CABLE RouTIHG PotNTS 11 8 cALcutATuon na. 8212IS CA6LE TRA1(WElGilT) LOADIMG 1/4/83 R6V. 0 CALCULATinHS (2IrAutER) 12 b TRAY LOADING ANALYslS memo To s1RoaTuRAL-TRAT 97s 00EtuAD 1/S/83 Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Speci fica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document .4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicabl
- ~.. - - Inspector D, 4 HAM 6ERLA IN Ne t$,' g Scope / Module STATUS of Pd6vlovs DOCUMENTS EXAMINED IN SPECTt0N FlHOIMGS 9990(1501 e 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 I3 G mErt10 FRom sTRUC40R(fL To ELECTRICAL - TRAY LOAOIMb i-lI-T3 A NA LYSIS - 096RL0A060 Po1 hts ACCLPTABL6 14 E DDG No. E-1L95 IncoRRELT HAM 6 PLAT 6S 2 -1S $2 I6 8 DDc Ho. E-1700 ELtVMiedS IN CoRRtCT 2-22-62 ib DDC H0, E-9119 ADD SPLIC6 80x 3 8'2 l 17 DOC NO. E - 7120 cA6L6 -rA8 CHANGES 3-ll-12 18 DDC N0. E - 7737 1.icoRatc 7 Fisto iNsrALLArror< 3 -2 5-82 19 3 DDC He. E-1%21 u]IRiaG /.ScHEmAToc cunnst L-2-52 20 6 STRVcTORAL CALC Book NO. 123 FAGF 700 - 708 12 12 '2 I l> TRAY LOAD 1HG ANALTSlS CA LC
- 821215 3-2F-tr3 l
22 FSAR 2PS-L SEcrlon 3.10.l. 1, 3 1/s3 R&V.93 23 3 PCIP-ll 1HV6STnGATIN(, NON confDRmANc6S 12-Il-S I R6V.1 i 2A b 7.fo Mfrt10 1HCoRPORATrod 0F 06 SIGN CHANG 6 DOC 0 r/1ENTS S 8 3 INTb DESIGN Docurf)ENTS 14 A 7trA6LY rAANNER 2T S FILL N0, P-28 PR0ftCT C00R0lNAT104 MEETING 3-25-53 2 {:> S REfoRT ON SP6CIAL AUDIT No. 95 (BTRON/BRAIDwo0D) DRAFT 27 8 REPORT OH SffCIAL AV0lT NO. 75 {LASALLE) DUFT Document Types: Columns: l. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number - 2. Speci fica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicabli
1 l .i! r l p e b d-i7, b a m c u i 9c. N l ttp 0 4 mnnp 0 eeea 9 t mm I uuf 9 ccI 9 l oo( ADD e 3 i n y 8 tff o T T nooi 0 e s f F ueei 3 sqpt v 3 R A R R neyae D D 3 mSTDR u Il lo C1234 O L IH db r L oT B M n i L (C [m D E 9 2 N T I C 7 M E A J X B E U b o S / H N S T E N L ) E T T T y M I I r U T I C D D a 0 L s O M A A es D C c I e L L R n A R T f C d l i c E 6 L y ro f f P G em i s S G de c rM e 3 G O p s V N N n C l S O sa ( I anr V D O o D I hrer 6 N D cet e rtth N A A T T unet f I PI LO R R H A O o 6 L 'f P f 4 E E 5678 A f-r R o M 8_ O o l e T l/t S c no / 6 A L i H T F s t e ael L A S p cra T 4 2 % % b ygi uu S Tnfd n 1 iiea t wccM D e naeo erprA lu mDSPQ r d u o o c o t H 8 9 0 D1234 c / 1 2 2 3 e e s a p p n c I S i
- i 1
i j
Inspector E 6EAg Docket No.To7 Report No. 93.ct . Scope / Module Pag' e s of 2 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 ] 8 2 M M e i2 F S A 'i2 7 /19 2ro 2. 2 i M M e. 52 r c> z o - 4 o C A t_ c * // 2 7 3/zg[83 3 g-2,ssee Toe si de BtDG ci?AME. cA Lc 22.2 /2f/g3 3/z[/lg 4 S a iM Meia r oRar,qe H AT AssesTHEUT cAte 227 d 5 8 a,ft sa,z__se i s sic (p, x an B Ase )2cs Po else Spec 7FA _h_ 2f_ffI CALC DE-TE - O t. 2 P _3_/k[Q [> E t M M e i2 (3 L o c le (A)A t t DestGr4 c A c c. *f f #3 K 7 } 2: mmc 2 TUR o i4E DLDG I:o cl el D AT:o d PLAd et 527'o' 6 ff8 To (SHoto5 L o c ATi o d. DF H Aid ste r1H ~Pe Pc SoPPo 2 TS ) Sih-8 8 e M M e.iR ro i23 r4 G. BLOG: PtPG 5 N OihBE'i2 so'PPo12T5 s[2.E[E3 C ALc_
- 22. S 9
3 e UGirlEEi2ndG c.t-{ A t4 G E. td o Ts c.s (ec A1) Sogi eft,772 (>[z [f2 [/f7pt ro C
- s. c d 3o g t cu.aToel coMPoo e.m r s o?poraT s it g
ecu gr7g c i_, a T o,3 H v'A c Aow it c AQv' s rE E L F/27 2 12. I Ecd '61 E l
- c. L i c T o u H v A c. bocT H AM Geias. 4. Mt sc..
k/3 g > 13 l 521-Iool C.o t o u u Lo c ATi o d PL A d CC'NTo rt ) 6/ h 5 Hows G e u e.e A u 5 Te. r4 oTe_s Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Speci fica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Pr.ocedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document i 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
Docket No. so Inspector
- 7. Se.AES Report No. 52,-01
' Scope / Module Page 1 of__4 3 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED I 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 gg u I4 7 SL5 -I-3468 TEA ras M iTs (2EV cc or s 2 -i oo i "I~ o ft. Lid ot S ?OldEi2. Co. ci edTo d 9 /,o[g 2 16
- )
l b O S - L. ILLIdois Po c.u e.72 To reg 3E o u T u i u e. s E' E M E D l 8% t-k C.T ' o U S - CL-14T0 d l( 1 5 iO% copTA,,a se.4T ELDG SE.cTto us % DeTAtt S r o [is[gz. co 4 CE.2didG SL@ UO tMT ib o'T S bYRo d Ib2A8 D "#" D ttteW S doTt8 17 ~[ co M M. E Oise d To RE G ~UE 00TLtde % co ERG.cT WE /t cTeodS 2,[g g / g g TAggd. EYRod ER A
- D W o o D 1%
~1 R E". G.1 TO C O H H. E.D t %o d i d S~t). 2GD 2.T oN @> @o d ~6 R A tD. l[2h8 3 ~ 19 1 EsACToQ DQ4 u] ELL GALLG2Y FEAHed G. SecTeous & DeT Aigy.,c,@ go [.go /g D [2t/ /f".3 2.c) "1 i M6 4. L To c o H M. 6.D tSc rJ ACCG.PTI M G -ST6_E.L E2ECTi oN C.EITEEt4(t A% 31 1 SKn 12e. Ac.To2 BLD C STcEL 9:M M E.2. itfil(C2-
- 2. L 1
S t c)97 CorlT Aid Mar 4T-BLDC Se.cTiords :k DET AILS MAReit.E H Lc 58 L ST 20cTuR A L S Per_.t Fic ATs de4 5 SDS N 1 3 L - g3 2.3 2.
24 1
$3C o 12e AcToa BLDG coM c. RET 6 S t AB ScHFDut G $+4T Z (r M MeEQ _ 4[28[33, E
2C 1
B 242 REAcToia. D RYuJc.LL G A LLeRV F2. AMrr4G s g.c_Ti od lTdA0 Page l of I
LAME (P kase Print)
TTTI.E(Please Drint)
ORGANIZATION (Please Drint)
.7).f._Cu,J-En - a-s Jua n i remn]
.s t L hen o. b sacb SenW 59slem Eng;nur (sHD) 34 L IVI A1lC C-b6 ras SEutoit. 6*(st !m E*x >cmo) 55 L
,A v < <,c (erro) ll/cl/4EL [ /fdoggsoJ SysrEMS FAIGiMEftc S S l-s.c,. G rhon Meek. P<,jul Euq r.
c 4 L-l K. T. A41mn1ra s u v supa wgoa %rea m w
=> N L
- 0. $ A 0' isn oof (O A lo or-d.n J o r-JtL D.TCeko t%Jn,r.d Ghg NRc / NRR /ncs e
R 3. PROSKI PRosfcr rs1AGM-;z1+nsA SA L 1 l l l
PERSONS CONTACTED ccmpany SAR(LHT 4 LUNDi aates 3kV 4/1/83 Occket/ Report No. 19900607/83-0/ Inspector B, CHAM 6ERLAW Page l of !!AME(Please Print) TITLE (Please Print) ORGANTIATION(Please Print) l1. C,77WLee Huo On bw es,. e s s' L. A. J. fru sic,' &,'eef $% ger., 2PS s+ L ~ L31 Pkz.n %.,ezi % A w L scs s4L TT #s -hw Ani,,..,,/>?,,,sn,-,:,. '41- //. E.//dL El a.1&o;7 E vge. S8L s u P E M lliG D f f/f f s s a iL l(.S(/f Gf/ / KA. Aboxixxv f<ecr. & artcr % S ti 2 E da r ra s, tied Pml. En, e SiL 6,M.0d > A fPenTA AMT. Mcd, ELECT.DEPL bdb D. A. 6IAteV siz o me,r ce< r.eacm. s+t G. L. D E Y o o t0 (r ELECT. EN 6R. S4L bl.S. EAL s autot B EL. Ph3.bMGL ML Z)A Seresarn nec Paa Mx4 (rL T G, i M O G R L. S EW OR-EttL W03 D (4 $&L 3. B. R.E Gh t4 ELECT. enc.. GtL l 6,4 TEEECE 6En nt E.LEc. Paoa. IN Gil. 53 1 L l 0. T. R o lo i n s o n 5 cc= cT - frsteel E" 6R Sk 2
PERSONS CONTACTED 5!28 [? 3 Company S AEG Ed T dLOMDV Dates Docket / Report No. 49 9 oo so 7 [g3. or Inspector P. SEA S Page ' / of / NAME(Please Print) TIT 1.E(Please Print) OR_GANIZATION(Please Print) P. SeAES 1?setcToe e aa ce u ;2c i?a.c TV Erf St k EIBi n PRbJECT terMc Top USNAC f]G[. P.s Rowil Assur cua faste rs a /w w $O0]002D&W q00CODRD/##70R A5 i L L. Id wrdE VC Lice.osd./,ecthfom<4,r . u j N ytc. o n/L i 1 R, E. t \\P MSKt staccwR Ay enc l os a n.c. NR& 34-UlckgoWA 26S7120ci. 43 1%R ,54L. .P A<?ciare s r/2 Apin sacr 34N H M / L 2/IVG H soft /vistW4 AesMWENGtwtM s'l't'. No Nw. St(s7$4r$7niaDEp7 SSL g, p.'3a sykr 'swidfg;ffy ss L C N. Kvidna swam W md. Sty. Env. Sf,r ;v. set S A. Er /ew J%.d.~ / Ai,y., $ ee 4.- s,IL //. $ S ese w m,w,1/ OE mu. No e Em,areias O to E R. J. P~ s k; Ns,# th y<r sm 8C M @ A$ Cele h S&' (
i PERSONS CONTACTED Company SA.26dMT dLUdDV Dates 3f&4 f G Inspector 9, HAG S Docket / Report No. Page'l of l NAME(Please Print) TITLE (Please Print) ORGANIZATION (Please Printi P> '> E A ES 2e, A cro72 G. Q G 52., - N)2.c (2d, G T A *: lv)D /? C O.5 ths/. k ul OA. % a,m SLL /W VEG4 Mtcs-cv>q o fAID S PL-hhO$Y hhs 00 R.O/A)& TOS Sh &. ?>. 0/Wl$h M.N b8LMotd tC e n s a t, n. rr-F' H D S $$ V 5 YGum/ u _S & / - bA. hC8KAIdl. Svfst vjJ o/2, E M S / L- %#/4u~n //kn ALE, b& Gth Msg one 3 ft l l l l [ l
31 F.ev. 3-C-75 ATENDANCE L5T SARGENT 4 LdNDY'_ DOcx2T NO. 97900607 COMPANY: Date: 4 - / - 83 ! ?re-hspec:ica Conference I,XIFast Especnon Confe er.c( (Flease NAME (Please PHet) m e (P1. ease ?rint) i ORGANIZATION ?-int) D. D. chart 16&RLAIM l REACTOR ENGINEER VS NRG REG,3 r ll.5. Tai Loa '\\ nan o, on Dio suora \\ S k L- .A in o 12 to s h}U d OADwiu.,w) sgL l R sea 2S 'i2 EAcTo/2 EAJG(2 l utta2c 2EG E l Troi, Msr - hwer l SL .- R. Orus ct V.6 SCt16 tis & 0'sJ. Direclaa-Zis,ne - 9L I 1 . Th ' NCkW4 A IE8TAud.bGGB.SI. 6IL J.M. M %vwun l /Mst. srecer Per7-l 3Yd l
- f. 3. M A 7 2.A PfoJ i%f2Ee7DA.LSCSl D.' L l
\\ & cs K u 4 I m c. m !sssu7 peptuna nasi cesr- .sd L i ~ G.M. C w ^ erE*TTA l Assisr. x6x. Essc7'.bsp7-sg L t E.V, AcreAHAM l' nec.g. pefi: M wp,_ ..SJ/C i k Y occoel-E< v -tscs l 5JL i ,Mrei+ f.< c m - 7 H,H.S~Aonf Pflo 3 Di(7. - c t n) TaxJ ! sdL .? AcS'; % Ecd Ls2w.rkd&eJ6 /.c I s/L i .Dc AM M ' fe9er dar LLLl di C k /DE/E Des WrWAse Cc/yree! dL. 6. 8, 8 / m /6 Y
- puh DF$ttyAf D/es'<7 cdr-I+G r l' ire
//i-n bu 39'l i '{.0,S. km r-rA S e o 7' Pr.e s' Eny S ['d I i /f. l' A B u/ i Jr. GA Coor,1,k 4 /I 4$1-i l. I j t i -}}