ML20024B183

Telecopy Ltr Submitting Draft Training Svcs Contract for Cold License Candidates

ML20024B183
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	03/08/1974
From:	NUS CORP.
To:	Moeller P METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
References
TASK-*, TASK-GB GPU-2276, NUDOCS 8307070241
Download: ML20024B183 (13)

Text

.

m -.....-..

e G9u culb

,1 '.

i-y.

hv@ dh.b. W.

._J z

""~

c

~

s 3

Telecopied'to Mr. Peta Moellerygm,;722,91'.li.;' ' y g3 yfibtdg.

on Merch 8,1974.

t.

TRAINING SERVICIS CONTRACT '

t

.)

1 This centract describes the services, conditions and cost schodule of L

h 6

nuclear plant simulator training to be conducted by the NUS Corporation i;

for the Public Service Electric and Gas Company and the General Public 4

[

Utilities Company. In this contract the term Utility Group means' the Pubito service Electric and Gas Company and ths General Public Utilities ',

4 Co:npany. The term Training Centar means the facility housing the PWR I

simulator.fWR simulator includes the equipment and associated software.

k

(

I A. TRAINING OPERATICN8 t'

Siculator-cr.c.ations are to be conducted in a manact that will fulfill the l

Irojectod t:nining requirements,. Simulator training is based on single r

shift operation, 5 days per week, 50 weeks per year, except for es-tablished haltAmys.

1. Inst *W'Trainina Initial Traf nf ng for cold license candidates is conducted for groups of

20. Prior to assignment to the Training Center, the group has suecass-

,y fully completed a 10-12 week basto nuclear course, an NSSS design

'Z.

i 1ecture series (or equivalent NUS Systems and Procedures Course -

3.

1 I

Gaderal Poction), 5 months of observation. and systems trghtgggw.3 w....

.1 specific pcction of the NUS Bystems and Procedures course).

~

.i ~.

,)

4

'e,

'the Initial Training Group is then divided into subgroups of 5.hBachwr.',

?

sebaroup sp2nds two weeks at the Trainlag Center, then two weeks on I.

aidst at as operatiocal unit, followed by two additional weeks of t:

h_ 'M[ lid-PJdiernhe.e 5.i.M., 5116.. C45%.I.?f.!.dN,4....f)M.. yS..N. SI?$'M.M,(

4

.7

.~

M. h Trsining Ceet.r a esign%u !SS.ThsdioG/.%.m94.&&.D._,....&

d YsWsG%E Fmi l ~.w..

. ;. e,.. v w n.

.ww:t.w:...

M ; w.q instriactor.

Draft 3/8/74 l

1 8307070241 740308 T"

~l s

e'.

PDR ADOCK 05000289 HOL

{~ ~ "f, Y

i 1 /3. Q -

l.,1 6,

,9,< 8,.8

- n y

-w I

l

. i

~

$.. A...... _.....,,._

- -,.. _ [

2%.,...

./:

'~~h. u.u.a.sc.:.,,W caa

--]

J 'O.. 1 1., wus1'trainim (conunued)

....c,.

-Simulator operations normally require 6 hcurs per day of contro1 roca

. i.

operations, reserving 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> per day for trainee preparation, group dis-

]'

--cusslon, and instructor critique. When a crew assumes controt room duties,

.apecific assign:nents are made - Shift Foreman, Control Cporator 1 p

f Control 054rator 2, Plant Operator, and Observer. Shift operations are 4

f conducted in accordance with the Administrative P:ccadures of the crew's e

Y y'!

home station. De crew assumea the shift duties-whh respect'to log records,' data recording, status checks, check-off list executson, and 3

manning assignments as required by the Station Technical Specifications.

t I

.o De Shift Toreman may be in the contro1 room or in the " plant

• Onstructor's V

(

booth) a[p, the Control Operators are normally in the control t

the FIan&Opeinter is normally in the " plant" h.structor's booth

~

the f

p Observer is taki.g data or observing operations as assigned.

Ib,..

We instructor acts in the capacity of Ioad Dispatcher, Station Manager, p

or Operations. Supervisor as appropriata. De Plant Operator performs or p

?>#*

Se responses of,,,.

MYIE..simulatas the tasks perfer=ed outside.of the control room.

the Plant Opera:or may be altered, as dotarmined by the instructor, to Y

l ((

~

2131tista cr.anged or unusual plant conditions.

r

. I 5

. }.,

i ience in " symptom

.. During allweeks of initial training, the trainees ga n axper i

f L

d Tocognit3ca." his is accomplished by conducting normal station operations r

. ',13 gnis skillin operations and f==mmeity with the trends and responses associated with plant evolutions. This skill includes Isarning the' sequences

}

of operst.tnal steps and tho' displays used to monitor the progress of operatsons.

l

,]

l l, ;f l. }*.

As sech crew proceeds through the four weeks of simulator axperience, crew

. ~-

aas'gaments are, rotated as much as practicable to equalize the training

' f'

.x..

l,

r2 Draft 3/3/74 1

i p

4 9

~ ~.,..:

-s k'_,-~.-~...

:. w.

. ; :.:h.'.

a.

i

• . - I I a s s i p.,T 6, 9., 9 i s

J

-~,_._,___,,,,,.,-,.-,-----,_,,..a.

2,.,.

. -n rr

.L1::.::u ::nytc..a c'.;;rrnArr

_" ~

'i,j fr A. WINING OPEF.'GCNS n - - i~... e -

' ~....

~

jj ".1

1.,1nitial Trstnino (.:entinuecE'

\\1.

i {

.I t i

.h,]j emperience and maximize the indivsdual leuning potential.

1 Ie

.The general pattern of simulator training will be as follows:

l j ;- j7i

[

.,< t 3

Week 1 - Normal Coeration i

p:

I g

'g Simulator femiliarisation, crew

..,Prerstartup.che:ck;11sts q'

' duties los maintenanca, data Reactor criticality f

q g

Turbine rol1<and generstar

~ll' s'

Start up to bot-standby synchronization and loading i.

f ir Power operation and maneuvering Shuh 2 hot-MW jq Cooldown to cold status D

I Week 2 - No :-al Operattens with Minor Malfunctione

,4 l

I (Abnomi Preures) "**v"'

l i

Perform cycles of station startup, power operation and shutdown r

with off-ncrmal conditions or calfur.ctions introduced to enhance

-the crtn's ability to rocognize and rersedy such situations.

Minor malfunctions include instrument failures, alarms, operater-,,,~,, ',

'l arrors (by the Plant Operator under the direction of the instructed '

!l r

and equipc:ent failures.

Proficiency practice on key operational steps such as criticality,

.j-i4 l'

transfer of controls-from.amnual.to autcmatic and vice versa, and turbine roll to synchronization.

l g,

r Perform cocidowns from hot stand-by to cold status with and I

Xi P-without the condenser.

g. +

l Week 3 - Abnor:nal and F.meraency Onorations-t@..' -

i D,-

1. css of major components - feedwatar pump, reactor coolant pump (one or two), loss of feedwater control, turbine trips, generatcr trips, loss of vacuum, and other similar circumstances.

r Change the configuration of majw equipment lineup, feedwater

(

heatars, makeup system, drains, and electrical station service u

rystem.

t

'f,:

~

E:sergency operations such as major and minor coolant leaks, main steam line high radiation, inadvartent release of radio-

.f' activity, inersesod coolent gross activity, coolant chemical con.

h tamination, failure of station sa:vice electrical supplies and electrical grid disturbances.

3.,.. 9.

t Drnts 3/8/14 I

,s i*-

• -~__._ __

m

.m osnm.

_=:-

- wm-

y.,..

f

(.

c 1

l ul7 0,' O..

10.5 8

l..

- ~ - - - - - - ~ ~

.- b'

'I Weoh 4 - Co n:M 0:eratiens and r-creenev Pr.tetien

• g..

i

'3 t{

Demonstratien and analysis of reactor characteristics, responses 4

?

and transtwnts (xenon buildup and burnout, reactivity coefficients, f

t' burnable an:t soluble poison effects and new fuel characteristics).

/*

)

'I Demonstration of and response to emergencies such as' loss of lf, coolant, main eteam line break and.fatiure of safety valves to reset.,

3 h~

Proficiency practice of key operational steps with added variables I.

l

( 4 of off ncrmal conditions.

Specialdemenstrations or operations as needed forindividual or 1

{, '

crew remedial tastruction.

l Simulated AIC. type demonstration era ination.

• ^

j' 1,

f The completten of four weaks of training willinclude critiquetwith the q

p, crew and, individuals reganiing their performance.

j l

l'.

2. Rootece ::ent Traintne g

8 i

Replacement training is conducted for personnel with backgrounds and 1

l previous training similar to individus1s in the initial training group. Re-i illtN;

1 placenient groups are composed as much as inssible of personnel from

'[.,

)

l

,, the same station. The size of the grouprir.ar range frc:n 4 to 8 licensa i.

candidates..Where this arrangement is not practicable a special J

s

' A training schedule will be developed.

i i-An in::tn:cter ir antyned to oc.ch4apiscament group. Replacement j

training is conducted in accordance with the general pattern established l

[ }h fcr initial training idescribed in the previous subsection). The pattern of simulator training for replacement personnalis a week of simulater l

?

training ir.tarspersed with a two-week assighinant at the ho;ne station..

~

of.the group.

". " * *. ~ ~. "

3.*

Recualification Traininct 2 'I T*i

~ ' ' RequalificationTraining' at the Training Center provides the instruction,

.I 1

simulator operations and evaluations necessary to complement station c

't 4

a.

Draft s/a/74

?.:i I

s p

t

's 1;

j'

:.=;:..- -

,=.a.~_

t

..e t

/3.C8 J l u. 7 ' ~ C. '.1. ;'

1 y

I w.,.

---.-e

_., _. -~-

.,,. _, ~.

-~

g C/h g,g', b i f.

/-

f,.

./

,J (. e.

o.{ j activities in meeting the requirements of Apperwiix A to ICCatSS.

i k

N As permitted by subsection 6 of Appendix, this training is designed \\

,t.

Q[lt 1

1 v

0 to meet the requirements of the following subsections of Appendix A:

Wf yl.}

3.a Reactivity control. manipulations, startup, shutdown

{g l4

}

v..

ii ih 3.h Understanding of equipment ard operating procedures.

[ lt' f

,t

_ yl

'and'other ocotrol manipulations s.

q

...)

g..

.. 'i.,

a.$

y<

e*

3.c Obsaryotions and,ov.aluation of !!censees' response s..

fg

, y, to abnormal or emergency conditions

..p 1. a P

3.d rerformance of control operations to respond to '

e$

< 1 f.i :,1 -

l ?;-

s abnormal or emergency conditions l*i i j Requaliccation training emphasizes abncrmal, emergency or operating

'n

~

f

., b I

procedures which have been significantly revised subsequent to lits j'c c

i p,

previous simulator usining.

h

,. U, A requalification group is comprised of 4 licensees from a particular

~,.

?

station. The annual assignment to the Training Center fcr such a group 4-I' is five calendar days. During the Ave' day period the licensees receive

+',.

i

• r instruction based on the following consideratiens-4 l.

I The individual's performance cn the most recent annual o

written e*ation (10CTR55, Appadix A, Subsection 4.a) administered

.;g.

3

,'q C.*,,,'.,-

athis station.

..-s.

' The individual's operational record of on-the-]otstraining*.".""~ ~~~)

3; a.

c,.

g*.a...v;.-

I{

control manipulations (10CTR$5, Appendix A, Subsection 3.a) and o

s'

,{

rs, I.

1" J operating 3rocedure knowledge (10CTR55, Appendix A, subsection 3.b) i ';

(

l

^

as compiled by his station' supervisors.

a..

Changes in operating, abnormal or e=erion'c! *oc9dures l

s b.or training.

L' o

5 ~

implemented subscquent to the individual's previous ein.4 4

O *

.F

~

I t'

l nart 3/s/74 i

i

[_#

k'.__.,

..e.

^* "

_____-z - ~'7 -_._.y puhE

-, M= '

e.

t. I j

mm

-6 taeg-I7

', r.

o. a,t I

..,..._._.:.,_...l r c m. :.:...

-.. : rr - - ;,

..m

... -~ ;.;-

~..r c

o

.r w,.....a-a.,.,..,

.r.

m

>,1

~,, f I

.. 3

~

.{.'.

I hi hf, Incidents or abnormal occurrences which have taken place

- ~$

o 2 i at the individual's station subsequent.to his pavious sisuistektWaing'."-

k, l

i d below:

'The format and content of each type'ef session are samar mo h-

[.~,)f

' Procedure Review - The1rocedure review is an inicrmal 'h l

8 o

I,1 -

classtoom session conducted by the Training Center instructor. The

f... -

i. [.

rocedures covered are those which have been issued cr revised sub-C'j s

j those sequent to the group's last assign =ents to the Training Cen*er,

[. f n

not exercised during recent Daining Center assignments and those

'e' ~ }

,4 j.

j l; requiring emphasis as determined from the results of tse annual writtaa.-,'

7-examination. The station procedures and simulator pocedures are the

' tL s

f.3 :

4,qli..

basis for this review sesstoa.

N

.e Simulator Operations - St=ulator opsrations are conducted

' i l,1

',?<

Shift Tereican, Control Room' o

j on the basis of assigned control room duties:

i Operater 1, Control Rocm.Cperator 2 and Plant. Operator. Control room i,

l l 8h.

conduct and training instruction are in acecrdance with the Mministrative

• r

.l.

n

((f Precedures and cporational practices applicable to the group's station. j, t -

1 As determined by the instzvetor's apgaisal of the group's training needs, l

exercises are conducted to develop ;.reficiency in system. procedures j

(those particular to a system, such as isolation, draining, surveillancs testing), station evolutions (startup, shutdown, Icad change), abnorma i

}

condition pocedures and emergency condition cperations. Exercise.s are t

l' repeated as necessary with individuals handling various control roo

'..l..

s

}

.t.-

tions These sessions are training operatione that permit the instrucice

,s

,.k.i s

to oceduct individual critiques and gicup reviews.

t j

Incident and Abrormal Occurrence Review - The incid

.,7 abcarnal cecwTence review is an informal classroca seaston conduc t

o the tulaing Caster i=structor. The situatices covered are those whic 4

j

' tetr trogsincy ce awerity have cafety..qlsnittenUMMrelate,to control i

rosen operstions. The aetue1 ceaes reviewed will inciude t,5oae fr

}

}

v~'., _

Dret'. 3/s/74 1

I e.-. %v iN

~

a m.

u-m.w..

4

-[

=

r la.sp -, lI 7 0 3..:

sw

.-------------...,,-n..

---

v,-,-.-.-

-n--,,,--,---.--m._n.-

.m.m....2,.s..m...

.t t

i j i.i 1

.^

group's station, other station.3-in the Utiitty Group and similar stations 4.1

\\*

q,.

?*

ef ot.t t utiliues.

i o a.

o 2I L

/

o Simulator Dealuations - The simuletor evaluation sessions are 1Y i J

oceducted in a manner similar to the sim'11ater operations sessions de-p 1E[

S.i scribed abcve. However, the primary purpose of the evaluation sessions h

is to per=tt the Training Center.instructcr to evaluete the performance of the licensees in the execution of their assignments. These systematic if observation and evaluation sessions fulfill the requirements of 10Cllt55, V

r I i Appendix A, Subsection 4.c and 4.d.

k-

'L M lj'.,< I

l., fa,L, t f:.

.i. -

Special Trainina -

As available, the simulators and Training Center Staff will be used to

.dM g

.i-

'f demonstrata and teach nuclear plant operating fund.se:entals to Mar.agement 4

t f l and Technical Staff personnel of the Utility Group. This special instruc-h to

-tion is.cn an "es available". basis when the training requirements of the.

nq '

4,i stations have been fulfilled.

m

- l)..

p A special $ fresher session may be desired for cold license candidates I.l,

l M, '

.t i i.~

during the period immediately prior to the AEC de=cestration examination.

h.

i This license candidate refresher training is conducted in the pattern of the j'.i 5 day requalification Mogram for groups of.4 ' individuals.

)

t l '1

-e r

. n.

l t

As required by the Utility".Grou.p;".10'.tE1? %,i.as5lcf nuclear t=4msntals v

ttr{ g, e nyc,1 ear

,t ng ea hf/*.( ;.

ing pay;be cond,qted'at.the, m...#.,w;.-.toaoomioe;c e. ucted;3y.A,_ f,

,_,t.

.ig? Jhe ngq! ear, fundgee k/f j,e.

lt 4. no e,.

........siapments dhi not, conflict'with. sim.ulator,. : int

- j@ j l.

m _.

[

(course would be tne Nuclear Pcwer Preg -TraininqJ.*?PT) co.,urse L i.

2 t

ec.,

j i

This nuclear fundamentals training course 1sf".r,ently in use at the Salem,

. t.

j W e,. y,:

L.1 ih7 4

r :b a

...A c c.44 w

.f, &;..

T.

i

. <...c >4.h.. n,_.

+.

-1 n:

i i..-

5 p

5

.4fi "r-l t

Draft 3/e/14

.d

' K.;

t _,.? ','

(O l

X

..m v.

.n'.Q; ;%ysLwegvW.t'.n:.w;':<...q, *q y

L_

l

+

~

. g..e

, jm 'm.

1 i

L._.

F IDE8-l I 7 0. : 41

.. m..... a _-

--.....c..~.

4. SDechi Tritnine '(eentinusvf) w h

• r v

-Oyster Cruk and Three Mile Island staticos. ne following major to;:ics T.1 would be taught following the.12-week schedule:

M

! '.. ^.i

~ Plant Mathematics and General Scicace (M) i

.i jf Basic Nuclear Physics (SNP)

)*

.1, Reacter Operations

~OtC4 T,

Radistica Protection '

OLP)'

-s j

. ! [N+'

.o Core Perfo:mance CW & B&W)

'(CP) s l

.s Instrumentation and Contro!

QC3 q

y. tI

t. ( '

. i s.

j' e

y,' 5. ^ Assu ed Co wittions.

.y

!; p.,

t.

l" p The conduct of training operations is basai cathe following assumed,

}

~

d'~'

condit' ions':",.

s I j (a)

The license candidatas for initial and replacement training ll, )4.;

moet or sc;ceed the qualineations d9 scribed in subsection 4.5.1'of MC

,4 L

4egulatcry Guide 1.8.

~n (b)

The transportation anilivi'ig costs cf all trainees are the j

b f

responsibility of the Utility Group.f j

lf (c)

NUS.per:;onnat anxi IItnity Gcoup personnel will not be

, n,

.j constrained from carrying out training ass.ignments by bargainingunit i?

contraetual provisions.

Specifically. NUS personnel and Utility Group supervicors will operats

-l' j 1,'

controls, take data, change recorder charts and periodonr,,contM1}'g@gQ l

. duties frequently performed by hourly personnel. NUS personnel are also 4-I<

l

{

.. required to perfum maintenance, tests and ins;cctions which in other

. facilities may be construed to be werk ncrmally assigned to bargeining t

j i unit persc nel. On occasion, hourly perscanel may be assigned to the role

[ ',

l of.," Shift Teremen" in the course of st=ulater cperations.

./

[

(d)

The Utility Group will be respcasible fer providing license f,

i

.eandidates trith the training and exporte: ce-which is required by 10C/R55 t

i

)

e

'v Draft 3/8/74 I

- ~ =

~

f-

~

3,ID.S'8 -

lf., 7 O. 5..'

.~

.3.-_,.,

• ~ *.-~~..~.

s...

w..e h ',!

5. _ Assumed cwittes (.-estisuM)

,4; f '

I :i r

I

v. '

/

but are not Movided by the Training Centar pograms. SpectBeally, this includes nuclear furdamantals (if oot taught at the Training Center), roactw L

operation that is required in addition to si:nulator training (research w' ' '

, - k

,4 I

power roactor), in-plant instruction on the physicallocation of systems, equipment and controls that are not simuisted, and pre-exair.inatica refresher

(

.a l

training on the latsat grocedure chugcs;-tachnical spacification it.formatico,

~~

'I r

field changes cr plant modifications.

L

.!ij 0

' h~ j j (e)

The Utility: Croup"wiu provide NUS personnel with the infonna-l I

'3/

tion required to develop pcoceduras and training m'aterials for use on the a,f ob simulators. This information is to be based en the operational nuclear units.

,4,,

t'

,,t.

(O The Utility Group will par =tt NUS personnel to qualify for

].

j-f.,I.

RO or SRO certification as cocassary cn one or more of the operational I

I'

(

'4 T.

c.

i nuclear units.

i t

i

.(

('

'r B. 'TRMNWG FACIllTIES e,

I f.-

The Training Operations described in Section A are conducted in facilities

/

..l a

and cm s!culator equipc:ent provided by NUS.

.t'

'L' 1.

Ste: ulster Ecutte ent ll The simulator equipment provided by NUS fu the Training Center is a F>j l

PWR Simulator which will be comprable with the ;rovisicas of the

]

{

portions of Part 8 of the Detail SpecLfications which are applicable to l.

e

~.

Pressurized Water Reactor controls. The PWR simulators have two sMs of 1

~

interchangeable panelf.'o'ce,Ept,'ide'occo-through steam generation and one constitutire-I g

a U tube and shell steam generator. NUS is responsible for providing the g

equipment and services related to the PWR St=ulator which are identified l

under subsection 2.1 Seller Responsibility of Part B of the Detail Speci$ cation., I.

~

l

~...

t l

Public Service Electric and Gas Cc= pay and General Public Utilities are l

.t

).

r-respons&ble fev+rovidte.g 6 tome 2.2.3 (Detailed description of PWR nuclear t

generating station control panels) and 2.2.6 (Design and performanes detail j

i t

~

- ){

?;

jf.

-t-j

$V preft 3/s/74 r

= _ : - - -.w j

~.,.

_ s n

• I

~m _.u.

.r

0. 61 la.sg-l,1, 7 v-3

)

[

l E~'c L-*h u mas....ac 'tconwauecJ

' - (t for one Wo.stinghouse ?WR and one Belicock an! W13ccx FWR for use in the i'. l l

%{

'. q{' '

simulator software modeling). NUS provides the remaining items of l

h.1 subsection 2.2 Buyer's Responsibility.

h' NUS will keep the. utilities. advised of the progress of simulator design,. -

l,* }.

manufacturing and installation. During these steps the ccmments and' l./

]..,ll

Mornsendations of authortmed Utility-Group repmsent:11ves will be con-I i,1

!(,

s!dared.

y' l

2:

.2.

Traintr. : Rosee d '

j.

NUS 3rovides housing for the FWR Simulator end support equipment. The

. ',. }

. Simulator room is to realistically resembIe the control room of a large, R

s t*-

commercial nuclear power station. The space dedicated to PWR Simulator q

l ; 'f..1I Training is illustrated by the area defined by sol!d lir.as on the attached a

e g'

l1 si

.i u diagram, " Training Facility Arrangement."

! J 4.

d l.

This facility will be owned or leased by NUS as may be suitable, no o

d.

t j

- actual 3ocation of the facility will be in accordance with subsection 5.

b.'

,Pacility location of Part A of the* Detail Specificet'ons. 'De currently

..;',..t.

tl.

preferred, area is the vicinity of the New Jersey Turnpike Exit 5.

y j

9 :. -

C. TD04 CF CONTRACT T

l NUS furnishes the Training Operatiens dor,tribed in Section A and the l$

L g

Training Facilities described in Sectica B cf this corcrect for a period of e--

l P'

15 years com=ancing in Apr111976. The sta. ting date for training operaticas r a is Spril,1976. This date is based on the execution of this contrac.t by

~~

i b,

.. p..

'.'..q l{'

', March 21.1974. Da Utility Group is required to advise NUS prior to.

l, l

l

,i

, July 1.,1974 of the extent of training required during 1976. Every effort,

f

._., '.will be made to provide up'to,'6.rEnths of day shift trainio'g.djlr;ng;1976.if -.]..,g

- r3 quired. If training ta regdred dustag the secord half of 1976 and this. :. ; j ".q PW1 Cauleine is act cepable of f.:rr.1,' shag'such training', the Utility Crobp, *.pl U

~-

rx. -,

~

acy scrchase atailer trassing ttra other o'>ao.se and 4duk ' ~ ' W.Yice : (Q A,.,

l s.

~

-of such trat=ias from the f:rst v..'r*.M!y perme&.m a _c,,.T A1

.i"'

i s

(f.

. *7 } :..-

.....,,q.,.,.. _

~

.V y t.'

D. RES f,. : " '

^

The fee Aar sroviding the Trairlag C;<rotsons a 4 Facilities is peld guarterly

'i i

j;

.s i

at the beginning of each quarter. The quarterly feea for the 15 year contract

[

l; pratt 3/s/74 !.

2 Q

1.

=e*

.=we-z 'y '-

M.'.

~-

m.m.==- -

• • W I

N f

g t.F e.

f

. i la.6 l

s* ~rs.-esu? J s 7 me,

.-.--...~_...-.a..---w.~=:,--,

vvauw.

r.

f,!

• M (condnued)

CONFIDENTIAL

$}

g E

COUNSEL '. INLY

hp[ am as folkst M{l bg;

];

.l I' L. *..

i

. ! ! ih;.,f.

y 6

.y -

. h....tyk W

1

,,e ' t.The fee is subject to chango if chargos rat within the matrol of NUS g;

i'.h1 are increasod. Such chargos =ay include, but are rot limited t3 vi.

p

q. e

., t.ti.ta,

' !,{,. fedora 3.and local taxes en buildings cr equ!;=ont, insurance cn buildings i.g;.( and equip:nont, and. building maintenance co st.s.. T..he Utility, Croup will ba Z... '*.i 0.,....%

i

..4

.~. 1..'

y

, :.. ' advised of such foe scjust=onts at 1 cast 30 days prior to the quarterly

..J

.s "7 payment first effected. Datn sub:tantiatir.c the need for such a feo adjust-iR.

g$.

!.$ =ent will be furnished to rc;rosontati/as of the Utility Group on request.

5'

..e i

n 9-Jy no fee scheduls was ectchlished on the basis of en annual calery r.nd fringe

,.g

,I borefit escalation of 5%. A fee cdjustment, as desertbed abova, cay be

,.h[

3. required if the consu=ce prico ir.dex indicates t.$a t the projected occalation is l

, g

. w;.linedequata. Such adjustments would be based on the consu=:r ; ries j.

v,:

t

!

• or the avaraga incrosse in sair.ry and frtnge benefit Iowl of NUS pctr.onnel O

y fof ccmparable skills ano experdenee'. "'"

1

. 5(J M

.^

,.,na faa schedule.was established on the besis of a 10% coat of fin:ncing.

M.

{.j<., If 10% or botter financing is not obtained, the fee cchedule win be adjust =d

- [f go p-

..t

[f.

. ac=rdicsly.

. :.=::..:: : :.E=

.: ?:

.xe.

If the amount of training on ths 1%"R Simulator required by the Utility Group exceeds'the capacity of the singlo shift, Soc *.lon A. Training Operations may,,,

1

'I be conducted on the ccoond (uvoning) shift,. The cost for such training is ",,,,

I

'E' i;f' per week in 1976 for a subgroup of 5 trainees. This (ca is subject.

... ]

i i.

[ to 6% escalatics annually and possiblo ocono= c indicater adjust =cnt.

[

J.4,-

1 E. SD4UIATCR MODITICATIONS 5

5 lL

. Nf

,, in ne. vent eet changes or alter cons are =wa to tha run si=uleter pg.

I' during design, testing or operation the financial,obligst!ons will be assessed W

C,. l.

4 in accordance with tie following criteria e

g p,

y 3f y.

g,,,t.

l l

.. _ --. -. 4--

l

~,.

g, e

t f

1

.. ~_..

13.s 8.!

,I, 7 0.

8 w

[

l

\\

[

..s

- - - - - =

_y*$;.

' 0,.g gNN T. 'NdNING USE D* OI!r4a UTH.17 4S 4, x

.O).

N Revenue derived from trcining operations cerdue cd for other ta:11t12s is to Q

serva in pr.rt to reduce the Utility Group g:artarly fcos. 'Ihc f:.0 reduct! ns c

h (J, f, i are to be apportioncd as follows:

O.

.p;I,f U

D:y shift:

Aft.a.r deductin; NUS marketing costs.

c c ;

g I

wock), and inctamontal trs!nin'; cocts, 70% of the f.',,.f.

remair.ing ruvenue will ha applied is reduce the

,g Utility Group quarterly fue c.d 307, cecrued to NUS.

Evenirn e.d N!nht ShMts: After deductin; NUS =arketin ar.d

b,

~

b n

incremental training costs 50% of the rocsining Mh>:

y'd j revonue, but rot Iccs than pc.: wcck of cub-i

, w grcup trainir.g, will bo sr.p5ed to rede :a the Utility Group

/

quartcrly foc s.-d 50% accrued to NUS.

1 G. WARRAN'N AND UM;TATION CP I.IA3:UW L

n.

r,-

l NUS Corperction warrants that work rotated to this contrcc:' and casociated

%1 y.

8 equip =cr.: will bs performed in accordar.co with cound en-inserira pesetica

[;; g and p:ofo:sianc! standstds, but makes to othe.r warrenty, o:q.rces or ff

. implied.1.iabili'y for injury of dam::.go to ;cr:cus cr preprrty cricir.; out of j

this work othct than for p;ciessional crrors or osais: ions.chall to 11=1tcd to

~

tho amount covered by tho concral comprehenciva lichility incurance carried l

by NUS. In tha cvent of any crror, omission or other professionni r.cgligence or any breach of the abova warrar.:y, the solo and cxclu:iv: responsibility yJ.

of MUS shall be to re-perfor= the deficient work at its own exponce, and h(

NUS chs11 havo no other liability whatsoever. In no event shs11 NUS bo liablo for any incidental or consequential damagas.

M If during tha cource of training oper:tions the PWR simuistor beco=cs un-y9

. availablo for servico, the training cchedufo will be revi:od to ;crfor=

(c.

training that does not rcquiro the sf =ulticr, cr ratkcup tre.ining Will bo

(

l scheduled at a 1ctor data, on a back shift or we skorr.! dr.ys as c;prc;risto.

~

..u.1:..

g hj Draft 3/s/74 - -

.._.i-h f-i fasta I,l 7 o. s.

t g

i

1 i

e.

.M 3p, ' l E. SIMULMCR MCDITICAnow teontinued)

,f,-

I(;

}

1. Changes initiated by the Utility Group will be reviewed by NUS and

.(y ff,

the incremental addittnal cost will be assessed to the utilities.

.[

n i

2.

NUS recom:nonded. changes which are considered vital to the

~

j training of Utility Group personnel will be proposed to the Utility Group.;y.... 3 '..,.j;.

g j.

[

.Upon '.

. t l 7

eppoval by the Utility Gros p tho inoriueental cost will be escassed to the

'i f,

?

i i

{

, f.,

Utility Group.

j n

3.

Changes initieted by NUS that will increase the training value p

of the PWR simulator to other training clients will be reviewed by the Utility

[

' h.

Group and the incremental additional cost will he assessed to NUS.

[

4.

Changes that are required to the FWR Simulator to meet AEC M'

b';

training requirements in effect April 1974 will be the responsibility of NUS.

i 5.

Changes that are reh. tired to the FWR Simulator by AEC regu-

., ?p,4 -

e j,

~~"- latbus er practices implemented after April"1574"W111 be parfcWiisdTand costs' gr.C [y P

t y

~

~ ' ' ' ~

assessed by negotiations between NUS and the Utility Groupi U.

6.

Changes to 'the panels o=psog= ass to match conse;eeding changes gt; i

I to the stations represented by the PWR si=ulators are assessed to the Utility

[

Group. -

,E I, 7.

Changes to the panels er programs to accomodate a new nuclear l

j [" i.,

unit are a:;ses:ed to the Utility Group.

' b{,

l 3

1 F.

TRAINING USE BY OTHER UTILITIES i,

When Utility Group port,onnel ars not scheduled for PWR Simulator training

[)

NUS will endeavor to market and schedule stallar training services to other

.J.)

electrio utilities. Such training is to be performed on a time schedule.

.ni I

that will not interfere with Utility Group training. 'haining for other utilities ri i

(

may be performed during the day shift if Utility Group training is not scheduled.

j r

s NU8 can market and ecmmit up to 40 weeks of evening and night shift p

training per year. If the Utility Group requires more than 10 weeks of eveni.w If.

q shift training per year,18 months of advance notice is required.

s J

When possible training performed fcr other utilities will be conducted during

' 1 J

i "vamet* weeks of the dey Lift.

4 a

l

! ? !

i t

Draft 3/8/74

{

h,,

p l'

4 -..

t I

1 t

10.&8 -

l,1 7.l ' O..'

mW i1 - -.. - - - -

.--~~;,..

~..

r r.

P I

~ TRAINING SERVICIS COhTRACT.

H. ADDmONAL SD4UI4CRS i

.i i r

rl "I

l Force inajeurs (to be suppliod)

H. ADDmONAL'SIMUIATORS i

If the Utility Group elects to request st=1lar training services on other

. {.

i

[

types of. power plant (BWR. HIGR or fossil), NUS is agreeable to expansion' of this Training Suvices Contract. The agree =ent for contract expanalon is valid for one year folbwing the.apptcval of this contract by the Utility t

Group and NUS.

'. 98:

t i

r I

l F;

I

u..

o' 1

p j

(.

1 f

3-c

{

, y

l. 3 l

h{!'-

j; w

t nc r

t U

r y

7 H

. f :

L i1 t

vi

.., o,i a

1 f

. +%.'

_a

.f

._r i

I 7,i ' i.i IDE8-

~

+

.