ML20024B043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to IE Bulletin 82-02, Degradation of Threaded Fasteners in RCPB of PWR Plants, Action Items 1,2 & 4. Required Insps Will Be Performed Only When Closures Are Opened for Component Maint
ML20024B043
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1983
From: Haynes J
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
REF-SSINS-6820, REF-SSINS-SSINS-6 IEB-82-02, IEB-82-2, NUDOCS 8307050010
Download: ML20024B043 (12)


Text

.n ,

i 5 9 1

Southern California Edison Company &E P O. BOX 800 2 2 44 W ALN UT GROVE AVENU E ROSEMEAD C ALIFORNI A 91770 J. G. H AY N E S t a t t eno NE o . ~ . a a . o , ~ u u . . o .. . 1,o ~ , June 29, 1983 mu nu.,

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comr.;ission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. John B. Martin, Regional Administrator

Dear Sir:

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Enclosed, as requested in IE Bulletin No. 82-02: Degradation of Threaded Fasteners in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of PWR Plants, are responses to Action Item Nos.1, 2 and 4 for San Onofre Units 2 and 3 The responses to Action Item Nos. 3 and 5 were previously provided by letter dated August 10, 1982. Action Item No. 4 is to provide a written report signed under oath or affirmation that Action Item No. I has been completed and identification of the specific connections examined and the results of the examinations performed as required by Action Item No. 2.

The enclosed inspection results are being submitted within 60 days following completion of the outage during which part of Action Item No. 2 was perforned as specified in IE Bulletin 82-02 Action Item No. 4 However, as stated in the October 1, 1982 letter response to IE Bulletin 82-02 for San Onofre Unit 1, we are also required to submit reports of information identified through our Inservice Inspection Program within 90 days following the completion of outages during which an inservice inspection was performed.

We anticipate separate reports would be required 60 and 90 days following the completion of certain outages. This situation could result in unnecessary ,

duplicative efforts and inconsistent report preparation. To assure a i consistent effort in preparing these reports, we intend to submit all future reports required by Action Item No. 4 within 90 days following the completion of outages during which the remaining parts of Action Item No. 2 will be 7hk o i i

e

, Mr. J. B. Martin June 29, 1983 performed. Reports of the first inspection of threaded fasteners for each closure opened will be provided as stated above, and documentation of subsequent inspections of threaded fasteners for the same closure will be available at the San Onofre site for NRC review and would be included in the inservice inspection reports when appropriate.

In our letter of August 10, 1982 we committed to complete Action Item No. 2, to remove, clean and inspect threaded fasteners within the scope of IE Bulletin 82-02 per ASMI Code Section XI (1974 or later) IWA-2210 and 2220, no later than the completion of the next refueling outage. However, in a telephone discussion on June 27, 1983 between our Mr. T. D. Mercurio and Mr. W. J. Collins on the NRC Inspection and Enforcement staff, Mr. Collins clarified that it is not required to perform the Action Item No. 2 inspections for the complete scope defined in IE Bulletin 82-02 prior to completion of the next refueling outage. Accordingly, SCE will perform the inspections required by IE Bulletin 82-02 only when the closures are opened for component inspection or maintenance.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please let me know.

Subscribed on this N day of W , 1983.

Very truly yours By: M ^t4#--

d. G. Haynes /

Manager of Nuclear Engineering, Safety, and Licensing Subscrib d and sworn t before me this ^^^^

day of

^^

op9 /9/3 .

I

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ornck^ s^u^L

/ < j!

AGNES CRABTREE MOTARY PUBUC - CALIFORNIA l

l PRINCIPAL OFFICL IN  ! ,

< j LOS ANGELES COUNTY  ;

NotarpublYcinandf the County of

~

$ , ,$N8" YY[N.

Los Angeles, State of California Enclosure cc: Director, Office of Inspection i and Enforcement, NRC

ACTION ITEM N0. 4 REPORT OF INFORMATION REQUESTED IN ACTION ITEM NOS.1 AND 2 l

1 IE BULLETIN NO. 82-02 DEGRADATION OF THREADED FASTENERS IN THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY OF PWR PLANTS f

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3 L

RESPONSE TO ACTION ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 IE BULLETIN NO. 82-02 DEGRADATION OF THREADED FASTENERS IN THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY (RCPB) 0F PWR PLANTS C

SCOPE The scope of action items listed below is limited to the RCPB. Included are the threaded fasteners (studs or bolts) in (1) steam generator and pressurizer manway closures, (2) valve bonnets, and pump flange connections installed on lines having a nominal diameter of 6 inches or greater and (3) control rod drive (CRD) flange and pressurizer heater connections that do not nave seal welds to provide leak-tight integrity. That is, CRDs having an omega seal l weld design are excluded from this bulletin action. The reactor vessel head closure studs are also excluded for those PWR licensees committed to the provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.65, " Materials and Inspection for Reactor Vessel Closure Studs."

ACTION ITEM NO. 1 Where procedures do not exist, develop and implement maintenance procedures for threaded fastener practices. These procedures should include, but not be limited to the following: (1) maintenance crew training of proper bolting / stud practices, tools application, specifications and requirements, (2) detensioning and retensioning practices (torque iteration), specified tolerances, and other controls for disassembly and reassembly of component closure / seal connections, (3) gasket installation and controls, and (4) -

retensioning methods and other measures to eliminate reactor coolant leakage during operations.

Quality assurance measures should also be established for proper selection, procurement, and application of fastener lubricants and injection sealant compounds to minimize fastener susceptibility to SCC environments.

Response

Action Item No. I has been completed with the issuance or revision of the following station procedures:

1. Maintenance Procedure S023-I-6.46, Valve Inspection, Lubrication and Packing
2. Maintenance Procedure S023-I-6.113, Removal and Installation of Steam Generator (Primary) and Pressurizer Manway Covers 3._ Maintenance Procedure S023-I-5.11, Reactor Coolant Pump Maintenance 4 Maintenance Procedure S0123-I-7.19. Monitoring of Threaded Fasteners (Bolts / Studs) in the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary

I l

{.

5. - Engineering Procedure 5023-V-3.1, Inservice Inspection of Class I Components
. < '6. Engineering Procedure 5023-V-3.2, Inservice Insp;ction of Class II Components Corresponding Quality Assurance measures have been established to confirm

) proper fastener lubricant and injection sealant selection, orocurement and application at all levels.

ACTION ITEM NO. 2 Threaded fasteners of closure connections, identified in the scope of this bulletin, when opened for component inspection or maintenance shall be removed (fasteners " seized" or designed with interference fit may be inspected in place), cleaned, and inspected per IWA-2210 and IWA-2220 of ASME Code Section XI (1974 edition or later) before being reused.

This report is to include:

a. Identification of the specific connections examined.
b. The results of the examinations performed on the threaded-i fasteners. If no degradation was observed for a particular i connection, a statement to that effect, identification of the connection and, whether the fasteners were examined in place or removed is all that is required. If degradation was observed, the l report should provide detailed information.

1

Response

This report covers all inspections of threaded fasteners performed during the outage which ended May 1,1983.

l An inspection of all twenty (20) hot leg primary manway cover studs removed

from San Onofre Unit 2 Steam Generator S21301ME089 has been conducted. All i

! twenty (20) hot leg primary manway cover studs were visually inspected per the requirements of Paragraph _ IWA-2210 of the 1977 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI. Eight (8) of the twenty (20) studs were rejected due to surface degradation, consistent with that resulting from boric acid wastage (see attached Inspection Report 2M-073-083 for detailed results.) The remaining twelve (12) studs were then subjected to magnetic particle examination (surface examination per -IWA-2220). No indications were '

found, and these twelve (12) studs were returned to the _ warehouse for reuse at

~

a later date. All twenty (20) studs securing the manway cover were replaced with new studs. The manway closure was opened because of leakage, and only the studs in the leakage path had any erosion. The leakage occurred because l the manway cover had not been evenly installed which caused uneven gasket-compression. -A new gasket has been installed, the manway cover correctly installed and no leakage has occurred at full system temperature and pressure.

In addition to the above, supplemental inspections at -San Onofre. Unit 2 were -

performed on all sixteen (16) cover to case retaining studs in Reactor Coolant Pump'(RCP) P003 and on a representative sample of the studs.in RCPs P001, P002 and P004 This supplemental inspection was performed in situ using.the-Combustion Engineering Stud Inspection Device. All sixteen _(16) studs .on RCP

I .

P003 were inspected using radially-directed longitudinal wave techniques to detect wastage, and the odd-numbered studs were subjected to an additional examination utilizing shear-wave techniques to detect thread damage. Four (4) studs each on RCPs P001, P002 and P004 were also examined with both longitudinal and shear-wave techniques. No significant indications were detected in any of the RCP stud examinations. The studs were inspected following the detection of leakage through the case gaskets, and an intergasket leakage collection system has now been installed as a temporary fix pending a long term gasket design solution which is in the process of development.

Tuliercurio:8475 1

l l

i

_ - .. . - = . .- . . . . - .

4 .

INSPECTION REPORT NO. 2M-073-83 l

i VISUAL INSPECTION OF i STEAM GENERATOR MANWAY STUDS i

IE BULLETIN 82-02: ACTION ITEM NO. 2 1

f i

i SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 2

(

l

_N' F'P9-*M'P' PW*"& W t e Fy e 7 v y 9 y -t

1 INSPECTION REPORT Project SONGS 2 no. c2N-F/5-SS gCE insp.ction D.ie 3-30-83 Southern California Edison Company , 5 Page of '

I SCE mN gmx 23670 Frime Suppher ,

Unit 2 Specification No. Mb M N b d C $ 21N Location U, .s.

& . A 22. L t item Description Stem / Gen Manway Studs inspection point uo.6 Contacts Blake Carpenter inspection Pi n no. N/A REPORT

SUMMARY

Visual Inspection. Visual inspection was performed as a result of I.E. Bulletin No. 82-02.  ;

I l

{

l

~

^

\.

\}

Stud 2-22 Hold Tag 007 NCR 2-205 The 1st five (5) threads from the shsnk 1%" wide area has thread reduction of 1/8" to 1/2" of the thread height. The shank is pitted 2 " by 1 " area. Pits are approximately .010 to .050 deep.

,. y, O. t. 5%de flNo/Hou Me um oestnieurion ,

ou p G Inspected By b M M Es{ 1 b Owl ( Date 3 '3 b' *t 3 s c= m'>

. ."=-*/7ad. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _-

- _ -( P#M Approved By [MM d Date -JO/J

INSPECTION REPORT, CONTINUATION A of Page

, W.O.

trem oescription Stom/Gon Mnnwny Sttids n a no. 2 3 6 7 0 no mfn.f D J3 l REPORT

SUMMARY

(CONTINUED):

i

^

\

1

)

L, y

=&

~

x e

1 2-23 2-24 Stud 2-23, Hold tag 001, NCR-2-205 Stud 2-24 Hold tag 006, NCR-2-205 The 1st 3 threads from the shank The 1st five (5) threads from the have an area t" wide with a' thread shank have a reduction of 1/4 to reduction of 1/2 the thread height. 1/2 the thread height. Pitting on The shank has pits of approximately the shank is approximately .010

.015 to .020 depth, to .040 depth.

l i

A 3713- A teEve 10/74 l l

INSPECTION REPORT, CONTINUATION p q q trem oescription Stem / Gen Manway Studs gQ . 9367n No. S /-t / 7 d.7

. REPORT

SUMMARY

(CONTINUED):

i 9

g '

h' 6 -

j N '

t+ ,

l I

2-30 2-36 Stud 2-30 Hold tag 008, NCR-2-205 Stud 2-36 Hold tag 004 NCR-2-205 The 1st (3) three threads from the The 1st (5) five threads in an shank have pitting to approximately area approximately 1" wide have

.002 on shank and threads. The ninth a reduction of 1/2 the thread height.

(9th) thread from the shank has physical The shank area has pitting of l damage of 1/2 the thread height. approximately .020 to .030 depth.

C 1

p ar.is.a saw t on4

l INSPECTION REPORT, CONTINUATION p , 4,5

,,,,g,,,,,,,n Stem / Gen Manway Studs  ; 23670 noA.a cf.-i-S e REPORT

SUMMARY

(CONTINUED):

)

4 y .

- i

. .- . g '

i.

W '. , . *~5 . .

~>

'
?; 6,li ,

v -

r .  ;

[n f ,lj

, , y g j 2-37 2-38 Stud 2-37 Hold tag 003, NCR-2-205 Stud 2-38 Hold tag 005 NCR-2-205 The 1st (6) six threads in a 2" wide The 1st (4) four threads from the area have major thread and body shank reduced by 1/4 the thread I reduction to the depth of .050 to height. The shank has pitting over

.100. The shank has pitting to the 005.

depth of .020.

C 1

1 p atis-aNewtona

"^ - -- - _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ , __ _ _ _ _ _ _

I INSPECTION REPORT, CONTINUATION 5 5 f Page of

. o

' n.m o.wiption Stem / Gen Manway Studs g n;, 23670 g,,gg g ,, , , ,.,

REPORT

SUMMARY

(CONTINUED):

.5 -

l l

Stud 2-40 Hold tag 002, NCR-2-205 The 1st (4) four threads in an area 1 " wide has pitting from .003 to l

.015.

1 p 3713 A NEW 10/74

_ - . _ _ _ . _ _ . - - - - . _ . - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _