ML20012E228
| ML20012E228 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1990 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20012E217 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9004020074 | |
| Download: ML20012E228 (112) | |
Text
-
4 4
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS L
- FEBRUARY, 1990 l
l L
i 9
-- m c;
p 4
L p
. :. 2 ; :.
./
w r-e
/j[
ja Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering 9004020074 900322 r-R ADOCK 05000285
~
PDR l'
p:
~
E r
k l'
i OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION O
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS t
PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING l-o e
FEBRUARY, 1990 1.
t-
, t;,
--),
.t.,~
s to iy-2 jln.
1t i' --
,)y..
'A, i
i
. 4,:.
' ~
k
'yv i
m e a q A w n m...
a w w w a a y...
.~
n m
i i
ia w aep n.,
-e, - a w ns...
a a w a g4 ep...a a % a ja 9u w p w, m w.nw
[^
W-db.ulad, r1ol % wv!!.y_ eahwnal i
m, a w ~ ~ 4 w.s-A
\\
W L'CVLb YY C
LD I O f f! %
w j -
4 - COTT146 b
6:
r r
s.
I a
1 l-P t
h
~. p r
d._
n 6
I' TABLE OF CONTENTS L
Eh.G.f.
Distribution....................
iv l
i Preface......................
1 U
Purpose......................
3 o.
Scope.......................
4 Adverse Trend Report................
5 Index to. Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Indicators..
6 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs.......
8 Performance Indicator Graphs............
13 Escalated Enforcement History........... 81 Significant Items of Interest...........
85 l
Definitions.................... 86 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals.................
99 t
Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates...
101 Production and Operation Records.........
103 Data Source...................
104 References....................
107 L*
I'-
b
,,_,,,,..r.-
r DISTRIBUTION t
l V. W.' Anderson J. T. Gleason J. B. Newhouse R. L. Andrews L. V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols W..R.'Bateman D. C. Gorence C. W. Norris K..L. Belek R. E. Gray J. T. O'Connor A. D. Bilau M.-J. Guinn W. W. Orr B. H. Blome-R. H. Guy L. L. Parent C. N. Bloyd R. M. Hawkins T. L. Patterson J. P. Bobba M. C. Hendrickson G. R. Peterson
.c' C. J. Brunnert R. R. Henning R. L. Phelps M. W. Butt K. R. Henry T. J. Pirruccello R. H. Cagle J. B. Herman S. C. Presler C. A.- Carlson G. J. Hill T. M. Reisdorff G. S. Cary K. C. Holthaus A. W. Richard I
J. W. Chase L. G. Huliska T. J. Sandene G. R. Chatfield R. L. Jaworski B. A. Schmidt i
A. G. Christensen R. A. Johansen S. T. Schmitz
- 0. J. Clayton J. W. Johnson F. C. Scofield l
l R.-P. Clemens W. C. Jones B. A. Schmidt L
R. G. Conner J. D.-Kecy L. G. Sealock J. L. Connolley J. D. Keppler H. J. Sefick G. M. Cook D. D. Kloock J. W. Shannon l
M. R. Core D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short P. J. Cotton G. J. Krause C. F. Simmons S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal E. L. Skaggs D. W. Dale J. B. Kuhr F. K. Smith R. C. DeMeulmeester L. T. Kusek R. L. Sorenson R. D. DeYoung R. C. Learch D. E. Spires L
D. C. Dietz R. E. Lewis K. E. Steele D. E. Dirrim R. C. Liebentritt W.
'Steele K. S. Dowdy C. J. Linden H. F. Sterba J. A. Drahota B. R. Livingston
- k. K. Stultz T. R. Dukarski J. M< Lefshult G. A. Teeple i
R. G. Ellis J. H. MacKinnon M. A. Tesar 1
R. G. Eurich G. D. Mamoran P. L. Thompson H. J. Faulhaber J. W. Marcil J. W. Tills
'M. A.-Ferdig N. L. Marfice D. R. Trausch l
J. J. Fluehr D. J. Matthews P. R. Turner I
+-
V. H. Frahm J. M. Mattice J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco T. J. McIvor C. F. Vanecek J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. F. Mehaffey L. P. Walling R. M. Fussell R. A. Miser J. M. Waszak S. K. Gambhir D. C. Mueller W. O. Weber J. K. Gasper R. J. Mueller G. R. Williams W. G. Gates W. L. Neal S. J. Willrett M. O. Gautier P. A. Yager iv
)
PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Ten indicators in the Performance Indicators Report have been changed. Two of these indicators are in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section, three of these indicators are in the Materials and Outside Services Section, three of these indicators are in the Training and Qualification Section, and two of these indicators are in the Quality Assurance Section.
The Personnel Radiation Exoosure (Cumulative) Indicator found on page 19 and the Maximum Individual Radiation ExDosure Indicator found on page 43 have been changed. The Thermal Luminescent Dosimetry (TLD) data for these indicators has
- previously been one month behind the reporting month. Because of the new TLD system that was incorporated at the Fort Calhoun Station, the TLD's can be processed on site and in a shorter time frame than the old TLD system. Starting with February,1990, these indicators will show the personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) and the maximum individual exposure for the reporting month.
'The Warehouse ReceiDts indicator found on page 56 has been changed. This indicator previously showed the total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts. This indicator now shows the total number of warehouse receipts, the number of spare parts receipts, the number of standard stores receipts, and the number of direct charge receipts.
l The Warehouse issues Indicator found on page 57 has been changed. This indicator previously showed the total number of warehouse issues, the number of issues from non-C0E stock, the number of issues from CQE stock, the number of direct charge l
nsn-CQE issues, and the number of direct charge CQE issues. This indicator now shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts issues, the number of standard stores issues, and the number of direct charge issues.
l The Warehouse Returns Indicator found on page 58 has been changed. This indicator previously showed the total number of warehouse returns, the number of CQE stock returns, and the number of non-CQE stock returns. The grehouse Returns Indicator now shows the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts I
returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct c1arge l
, returns.
The SRO License Examination Pass Ratio indicator found on page 72 and the M License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator found on page 73 have been changed. The
- examination pass ratios shown in these two indicators have now been broken down into four categories. These categories include: NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered i
license re'1ualification exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams.
PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The License Candidate Exams Indicator found on page 74, (previously the R0 Hp_t, license Exams Indicator), has been renamed and clanged. This indicator now shows the number of SR0/R0 quizzes and exams administered and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and R0 candidates' monthly progress.
- The Percent of CAR's Greater Yhan Six Months Old Indicator found on page 79 and the CAR's issued versus Sionificant CAR's issued versus NRC Violations issued versus LER's ReDorted Indicator found on page 80 have been changed. Previously
.these two indicators were concerned with tracking performance on Deficiency Reports and Quality Reports (DR/QR's). DR/QR's have recently been renamed. These reports are now known as Corrective Action Reports (CAR's). The two indicators mentioned above now reflect this change in report names.
One indicator was deleted from the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator is in the Maintenance Section.
The Craft Work Activity Indicator has been deleted from the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator was deleted upon request of the Maintenance Department. The request for the deletion of the Craf t Work Activity Indicator was due to the fact that the Ratio of Preventive Maintenance to Total Maintenance Indicator found on page 31 is more representative of the work activities of the Craft.
Two indicators have been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report. These two indicators are in the Design Engineering Section.
One of these indicators is the Enaineerina Chanae Notice Status Indicator found on page 66. This indicator shows the total number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that are open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that wero opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month.
The other indicator that was added is the Enaineerina Chance Notice Breakdown l
indicator found on page 67. This indicator breaks down the total number of ECN's that are open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were o>ened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during 41e reporting month, and the number of ECN's received by Design Engineering during the reporting month into several categories. These categories include: ECN's
- requiring document changes to be completed, ECN's requiring substitute replacement iters to be completed, and ECN's requiring facility changes to be completed.
l I
l 1
7 PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready
=
identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring fort Calhoun's. plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
C
[-
~
\\
g.
lJ
-SCOPE I
i 1
In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this l
program:
[
f Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
l Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
.l This will ensure consistency in future reports and ellow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are e 1couraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
l 1
i j
F ADVERSE TREND REPORT i
The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as an Adverse Trend is one in which the current month's data has more deficiencies than the data presented two months prior.
UnDlanned Safety System Actuations Indicator - Page 15 There was one safety system actuation during the month of February.
7 This actuation involved the start and load of Diesel Generator 2 (DG-2). The DG-2 actuation occurred when backup lockout relay 86/2BF5 trip)ed and caused a loss of off-site power and a loss of shutdown cooling.
Corrective Maintenance Backloo >3 Months Old Indicator - Page 30 The corrective maintenance backlog has been increasing. The reason for this increase in backlog is the increased emphasis on outage maintenance activities.
Maintenance Overtime Indicator - Page 34 The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours has been increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
E.t9.9.rdable iniurv Cases Frecuency Rate Indicator - Page 68 The recordable injury cases frequency rate increased from zero in January to 0.94 for the month of February. This increase was due to one recordable injury which occurred during the month of February.
9
L SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS L
These pages have been added to the Performance Indicators Report. The
' purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators
.pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters that can be trended.
i SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability D.gt Through Us's of Performance Indicators j
Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
35
{
Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
44 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
68 i
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's..........
69
~ t CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus i
NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported..........
80 a
SEP Reference Number 20 - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are-Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported..........
80 SEP Reference Number 21 - Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported 80 i
SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level.........................
71 SEP Reference Number 26 - Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................
21 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate..............
68 SEP Reference Number 36 - Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (CorrectiveNon-OutageMaintenance) 36 SEP Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............
48 -
7.
SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP)
PERFORMANCE ICICATORS (CONTINUED)
SEP Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure ProcedureProgram(continued)
Security Incident Breakdown
..................49 Security System Failures....................
50 f:
.SEP 09#erence Number 71 - Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications 64 4
1 i
5 k
i l
l l'
l -
r PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS
^
i INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS I
i Forced Outage Rate.......................
13 F
' Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical.........
14 d
i Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
15 Gross Heat Rate.......................... 16 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
17 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
18 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
19 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
20 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.................
21 s
I r
I i
li l
I 1
li l
p E
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
OPERATIONS Forced Outage Rate.......................
13 I
Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical.........
14 Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
15 Gross Heat Ra te.........................
16 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
17 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
18 Daily Thermal Output......................
22 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours........
23 Operations and Maintenance Budget................
24 Document Review.-........................
25 i
MAINTENANCE r
Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)...........
26 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............
27 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders...........
28 1
Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................
29 u
Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old..........
30 L
Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............
31 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue..............
32 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........
33 Maintenance Overtime......................
34 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
35 i
J L
Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage).....
36 1
\\
Number of Nuclear Plant Reliabilit Reportable Failures........y Data System (NPRDS) 37 i
1
.g.
1 1'.
.l
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS l
(CONTINUED)
CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 1
Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
19 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
20 Secondary System Chemistry...................
38 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit....
39 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits....
40 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service..........
41 Hazardous Waste Produced....................
42 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure..............
43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
44 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................
45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
47 I
SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............
48 Security Incident Breakdown...................
49 l
Security System Failures....................
50 l
MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES 1
Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts..............
51 Spare Parts Inventory Value...................
52 Spare Parts Issued.......................
53 Inventory Accuracy.......................
54 Stockout Rate..........................
55 Warehouse Receipts.......................
56 Warehouse Issues........................
57
~
'l 1
I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS L
INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) l l
MATERIAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES (CONTINUED)
Warehouse Returns........................
58
)
Material Requests Awaiting Approval...............
59 i-Expedited Purchases;......................
60 p
I n vo i ce B re ak d own........................
61 L[ -
Material Request Planning....................
62 l
DESIGN ENGINEERING r
L Outstanding Modifications....................
63 Temporary Modifications.....................
64 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Priority Breakdown.....
65 Engineering Change Notice Status................
66 i
Engineering Change liotice Breakdown...............
67 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.................
21 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.._...........
68 HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs...........
69 Personnel Turnover Rate.....................
70 Staffing Level.........................
71 TRAINING AND OVAllFICATION l-
.SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio...............
72 i
R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................
73 o
License Candidate Exams....................
74 l
l Hotlines............................
75 1
1 1
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) l TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION (CONTINUED)
Classroom (Instructor) Hours..................
76 Total Hours of Student Training.................
77 OVALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.........
78 Percert of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old..........
79 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus.......
80 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported W
t 1
1 l
l 1 l'
t
t E
- Forced Outage Rate 6
e-rort Calhoun Goal f
e Industry Upper 10 Percentile 5-i GOOD i
L 4-4 R
a t
3-1 e
t 2
O --- O -- G----O --- G----G---
--- O- --- O --- G----O--- O l
1.4 I.0 1-l
.. 0 0
^
~
~
~
'87
'88.'89 MIr Air MTy J7n Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 FORCED OUTAGE RATE There were zero forced outage hours logged for the Fort Calhoun Station during February, 1990. The present 12 month average forced outage rate is 1.3%.
The last forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of.1989.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%.
l.
The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4%
and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1990
' performance goals can be found on page 99.
l Adverse Trend:
None i
L 13-i r
r
~
1 9
E Reactor Scram 5-(
O-Fort Calhoun Goal l
-G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-i S
3 GOOD i
C i~
r
+
a m
2-i 1
1 o....g....o....e....o.... o....o....o... 9....o....g....e I0 t
0 0
0 0
0 O
m m
m m
m m
m m
m-
'86 $87 '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb i
1989 1990 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL
)
There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in February. It has been 1.337 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2, 1986.
The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1.
1 The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
Adverse Trend:
None
I 1
Safety System Actuations G-Fort Calhoun Goal
-G Industry Upper 10 Percentile r
A' C
t GOOD i
a 1
+
o n
o....e...o... 9....q...- O ---G ---G---- 0 ----O
\\
g g
\\
0-0 0
g f
'87 '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There was one unplanned safety system actuation during the month of February, 1990. This safety system actuation was a diesel generator-start and load sequence. The start and load sequence of DG-2 was due to the inadvertent trip of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5 resulting in a loss of off-site power and loss of shutdown cooling.
The 1990 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal is based on past l
performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is cero, i
L Adverse Trend:
The Fort Calhoun Station had one unplanned safety system actuation in February, 1990.
l i.-
This actuation was a start and load of DG-2 due to an inadvertent trip of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5.
I..
g.'
?l O,
't I
IMonthly Gross Heat-Rate
,1 aw l ;<..
-- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate m
G-Fort-Calhoun Goal
@ ![f b y
-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile.
m A
GOOD i
10750-
_ 4, a
't 10520-0 B
t
. 6
{10500-p
/
10270 K
W 10250-
.O-H-
G
--G--- G--G--- O---G---G--G --- O ---&-- O
' 10014 4
10000- e.
_ e-- e _-e.__ e---e__e _ e - e _-e - e - e
+
'87.. - 88
'89' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1
GROSS' HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station increased from 10,435 BTU /KWH during January to 10,507 BTU /KWH during February. The gross heat rate value increase' for the month of February, 1990, was due to the operation of the - plant using two circulating water pumps instead of three circulating water pumps.
The 1990 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,459 BTU /KWH. The 1990 goal is 10,200 BTV/KWH.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH.
Adverse Trends:
None,
i
J
_"'I l
l 1 Monthly EAF
^
- 12 Month Average EAF G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD
-G Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-77 80- G-O 7
p!
71 00
&.._9..e.._9
_..g_.-O- -- & --
- -O---e --4)
P 60-p g.
m m
t e
n 40 n
l l
20-t
~
0
'87
'88 '89 Mar Apr' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR
.The Equivalent. Availability Factor (EAF) was i
reported as 53.88% for the month of February.
The low equivalent availability factor value for the month of February was due to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The 1990 EAF goal is 65.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 83.6%.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%.
Adverse Trends: None l
5-
-++- Fuel Reliability Indicator.
. G-Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-n a
n 3-y.
3_
-u GOOD
+
eg2 a
m 1-O----G--- G---G---e---O--- G----G---+---G --- G--- O
.13 0
P M
A-
- ~~~"
' - ~ ^
' '~ - "
O
'87. '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun dul Au'g S'e'p Oct Nov De'c lan F'e'b 1989 1990 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR
-The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 0.0 nanocuries/ gram for the month of February. This FRI value-indicates that there. have were no fuel-failures during Cycle 12.
The 1990 fuel reliability goal has' been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram.
The fuel ' reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is - 0.07 nanocuries/ gram. The -Fort
' Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator Adverse Trend: None m,
se
- Personnel Radiation Exposure 38;:
'400 e-Fort Calhoun Goal
-G-Industry Upper-10 Percentile GOOD 300-272
+
e.--O
...e - -O...o..- e - O...
R
/
E 200-P M
g e_ _g O--O O-G-
G 8-O-G-O
,t
.l O
q 93.4 100-
/
4 r
/
i
,O' l-0 "' '
'8_
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 l
PERSONNEL RADIATI.0N EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) 1 The Personnel Radiation Exposure Indicator has been changed for the month of February, 1990.
The Fort Calhoun Station has-incorporated a new Thermal-Luminescent Dosimetry (TLD) program.
This new program allows for on-site TLD dose i
reading. With this new program, the TLD dose i
rate values will now be' reported for the current month.
1 During February, 1990, 13.4 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the I
Fort Calhoun Station.
l l
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for February was 47.9 man-rem while the actual recorded exposure through February was 18.2 man-rem.
The, personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year.
Adverse Trend:
None.
1
(
.i Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500-
===== Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal:
e Industry Upper 10 Percentile C
u
[7500-GOOD c.
4 6195 F
^
g :t '5000-jg
&--- e--- o--- e----e--- e----s---+---s ---e --- e ----O 4454 a
B WW4 W~&4 B--- W 4 W4
- gg99, 1722 l
q j
ei t 0
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul-~Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-s 1990 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLIO RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE I
The above-graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste-shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of i
waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the change in 1
-inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial.
^
Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet):
l Amount Shipped in February 0.0 -
Amount in Temporary Storage 330.0 l
1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped 158.1 1990 Goal 5000.0 The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit 4
per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Adverse Trend:
None __
k Q
2-B+ 1990 Disabling Injury Frequency _ Rate l
-N-1989 0isabling Injury Frequency Rate 1.75-
.a' 5 Year Average Disabling-Injury Frequency Rate
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 1.5-G. Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.25-R-
GOOD
<a' 1
- t 4
u
/
.75-
{
.5-m n
e ---- e- -- e.----
9 ----.e ----.e.----.o a
aA u
0 t
m Jan
_Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec January 1990 DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
The Disabling. Injury Frequency Rate Indicator was changed for the
-month of' January. This indicator now shows the current monthly disabling Einjury. rate in column form. The 1989 - disabling injury-i
. frequency _.. rate and the Fort Calhoun Station-5 year ' average disabling-injury frequency rate was added to this indicator for - the month of-
' January. There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort
.Calhoun Station -in February. The total number of disabling injuries 3
- in 1990 is zero.
i The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was' based on one disabling injury occurring in 1990.
The' industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%.
9 The year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 0.6, 1.6, and 0.4 respectively.
This indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26.
Adverse Trend:
None l
~
[
.-+- Thermal Output
- Technical Specification Limit
-& Fort Calhoun Goal 1500;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; - - - - -
... - - -' - -):
j 1 00; 600-
/j/)j February 1990
. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The.above -thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the --1500 thermal megawatt average: technical. specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross i
hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant' operation.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station from February 1 through February 15 was approximately 100%. Power was then reduced ' for the i
1990 Refueling Outage.
Adverse Trend: None 4
t r
. ( c' y
!~.
.j o
_f t..'
a 1
-M-Equipment Forced Outage Rate
[
1 F',,
.8-i
.6-
! GOOD R
.4
~
t.
- .4-1
.2-
.13 0
0 0
'87-.
'88-
'89 fa'n F'e'b Mar Apr' May Jun Jul? Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec:-
1990 L
1-1 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES-I' PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS
?
i There' were zero-forced' outage hours o
reported for - the Fort Calhoun - Station l
during.the ' month. of February, 1990.1 The current-value for the number of equipment y
forced outages per 1000 critical hours. for l
1990 is zero..
l+L*
The last ' equipment forced outage occurred in September of 1989 and was due to a cable problem with the resistive temperature detector on reactor coolant pump motor l
RC-3A.
r Adverse Trend: None i
- ~
s
- Actual Operations Expenditures
~125-
-J-X-OperationsBudget-0 100-
.,. g f
. Id; 75-1o:
il'-
q l
o11 50-
?
na:
s
'- s'r J
s 25-0-
Jan Feb Mar-.Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct - Nov.
Dec 1
'1990-
~
40
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures Mf-
" 9" 30
. i? '
i ld' l
- 1 i 1.20
. o 1-
- na s r10' s'
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1
e
' OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET l
The - Operations and Maintenance' Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the_ Fort.Calhoun Station.
4
- The. budget year. to date for Operations -was 16.0 million dollars for February while the actual cumulative expenditures through February totaled
~
11.8 million dollars.
>The budget -year to date for Maintenance was 4.3 million dollars for February while the actual cumulative expenditures through February totaled 3.0:million' dollars.
. Adverse Trends:
None
.l -!
j
~
- 500-
..+- Documents Scheduled for Review 4 Documents Reviewed-l Overdue Documents
~!
400-Ni D f-c(300-
/
b u-i
' ' je : m -
i
+
j$
r e-
/
,i
,ot
[
/
\\
i f-s ~.
\\
j
</- X \\
V
// \\\\
s
/
\\
'J
\\\\
100-
- X-
/
g
\\
//
\\\\
i
/
\\(,,h
+;,
N
,. - g
.g
--- '-%p e,/~,
- " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #,,)
-\\g sy X
b N '
.0.
Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep.
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990; DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator.shows the number of biennial reviews completed during u
the reporting month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the reporting month,'and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue.
These document reviews are performed in house and include Special
' Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. 'The' documents included in 'the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the.. Technical Data Book, the Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Emergency P.lan L
Implementing Procedures, Operating. Procedures, Emergency-Operating H
- Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, Operating Instructions, the. Radiological Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures.
During February there were 50 document reviews completed while 23
.i E.
document reviews were scheduled. At the end of February, there were
- l 75 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of January consisted primarily of maintenance documents.
During the month of February there were 457 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1992.
Adverse Trend:- None u g
r-w
~,
74 4
.s>..
2,
..x
.8
{
w
,.7 cp
' 100-Diesel Generator No. 1
^
-X-Diesel. Generator No. 2 :
e Fort Calhoun Goal i
4 96-
- .7 s._ _ _ _ q. _ _ __ e.....e._ _ _ _ q..... e _ _ _..e._ _ _ _.e...... e... _4. _ __.e._ _ _. e.
94-X X
.X N
jX X
s'X X
X----X X
X'-
.P 92-
, Ir! 90-a
.c
.e 88-
. n.-
^
.t 86-GOOD 84-i 82-80 Ma'r Apr - May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
.Jan-Feb 1989 1990 t
i DG RELIABILITY-LAST 100-DEMANDS Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability
~ factor over the last.100 valid demands.
Diesel. generator D-2 has a 94 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
The ' Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal.
February's data:does not include the February 26, 1990, loss of off-site power demand start of D-2.
This demand start of D-2 did not cause the diesel generator to be loaded for a minimum time period of-60' minutes.
Adverse Trend:
None i.
9=
~
- ' Diesel Generator No. 1
-Xm Diesel Generator No. 2 l
4
'O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100-
'l l
)
l l
f a &- -- - G-- - -- e - ----& ---- G --- --e - - ---& ---- e----- e --- +--- - G----- e 7
p--
3-
/
- e-
/
r
/
p
._90-X X
A n'
t' G000 l
85-i 1:
1
-80 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 l
l l
l :'
4 DG RELIABILITY LAST 20 DEMANDS E
Diesel' generator D-1 has: not-had a failure in-'the last 20, demands on the unit. The present reliability factor
-for D-1 is 100%'over the last 20 demands.
Diesel generator D-2 has had one failure in the last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor over the last 20 demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%.
Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet this goal.
February's data does not include the February 26, 1990, loss of off-site power dem&nd start of' D-2. This demand start of D-2 did not cause the diesel generator to be loaded for a minimum time period of 60 minutes.
Adverse Trend: None ;
s y[%/. ?,
~
~- -
f.e, lye
.v 2
2 o
s 400-December 1989 E ' January 1990_
R February 1990 g
~
Of,-300 L
a-200-n:
'*9:
l-L~
l0
',,5;
.e.
l'
- r..
100-
.s' aa
[
0-
]-
^t 0 3 6-9 ~
9-12
>12 Age in Months
=
L
-AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS I
L (CORRECTIVE.NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the-age.of corrective non-outage ' maintenance work orders -(MW0's) remaining open at the end of.the reporting month.
Adverse Trend: None-4-
I. -
l 1
i t:
(
i i-l L::.
~,
sika
. 600 '
1989 i
T December 7 4
4 January 1990 r
as
}l 1-1 February 1990
~
K
~
-~400-1 M
l
=
E
's 200-g j'
1 E
5 1
i
=-
==
s i
l 0 -.
. Total Open Total Open-Open-
'Open
-MW0s Open-Safety High 1
'MW0s
> 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related NW0s MW0s MW0s
,> 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKOOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE)-
This indicator - shows the total number of corrective ~non-outage-MWO's remaining.open at the end of the. reporting month, along with a breakdown by.several key categories.
Adverse Trend:- None L
s
'u.
4 1
- C:rrective Maintenance _ Backlog > 3 Months Old l
-O-Industry Upper Quartile-1 g
80-i
- i..
'60-1
- r o
-O O
O O
O w
0 0
O' O
O c 40 e
- n
- .j-t1 GOOD
.~ 20-E O
i Mar Apr' May
.Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990' f
v CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-00TAGE)
This indicator shows the percentage-of open corrective non-outage, maintenance work' orders that
-are -greater than three months old at the' end of the reporting month.
The' percentage of.open corrective non-outage maintenance work-orders that are greater than three months old at the end of February was reported as
- 62.4%
The-industry ' upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 44.1%.
Adverse : Trend:
The increase in the percentage of
-open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of February was due to increased effort by Maintenance to complete open outage maintenance work orders during the 1990 Refueling Outage.
L,
x<
_{
9
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance
<>- _ Industry Upper Quartile 90-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-
.o 70-
-P.
L*
60-O-- --,-----Q-----Q----Q----g-----Q---,----Q----g_-g---
v v
v-v v
v c
. (y
- n...t -
^
40-t GOOD 30-20 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (N0N-0UTAGE)
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of-completed non-outage preventive maintenance _to total completed non-outage. maintenance.
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station increased to 62.4% in February.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of p
preventive to total maintenance greater than l
60%.-
1 The - industry-upper quartile value for the ratin of preventive to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.
L Adverse Trend: None l
l L
l l.
l
f q ;;
^
^
]
y.
6 J,
j a[
- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue 20-
+ Industry Upper Quartile -
-l e-Fort Calhoun Goal.
115-i
- P.
ce:
GOOD-
.r.
- c-
- 10-
+
J e-
- n~-
t, o 5-o 3
- G O=-= =- O ----- 0 ---- 4 ----O 8 ---- 4 -----@
f Feb.
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec JanJ 1989-1990.-
o
'c PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE
-The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the -administration and execution of 4
1 preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage.
of preventive maintenance-items overdue indicates a l!
station commitment to the. preventive. maintenance-l program and. an ability to plan, schedule, and L
. perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.
h.
The preventive maintenance items overdue value was not reported for the month of February,1990, due to the implementation of the new Preventive Maintenance Order -(PMO)~ Program and the problems involved with tracking the new Program's progress.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2%
y preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.5%.
Adverse Trend:
None i
^
(3 Total'Centrol Room Instruments Out-of-Service E Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month
(
l IOut-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month L35; W industry _ Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments
-G-Fort:Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments :
30-l t,
7 25-
~
GOOD
.20-t 4,
115-t
,i 30-l.
[
. Mar
- Apr<
May
~Jun Jul Aug-Sep Oct Nov-Dec Jan Feb 1989:
1990 NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE-CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS :
This indicator shows the total number' of ' out-of-service control room instruments at the end of the reporting month, the number of out-of-service - control room instruments that were corrected during the reporting month - and the number of control room instruments that were
- added to the out-of-service contro'1 room instruments list during. the
' reporting" month.
~
~1 There was a total of 11 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of'. February. During the month of February, 7 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 7 instruments were -added to the out-of-service instruments list.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments.
The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9.
l
-. Adverse Trend: None I
i g
q i
I
- Maintenance Overtime p'
. *- 12 Month Average
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 60-GOOD j
+
e.
.\\
-- r 40-
/
C
/
- e'
&-'--- G----- G --- -- e -- -- -s -----&----e----- e----- e -----s -----e'
.i n 1
t:
\\
\\
'20-
\\.'
L L-1' l-0 l
Mar' Apr.
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989' 1990 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME l-The ' Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perfo_rm the desired maintenance activities with the allotted L
resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource i
allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
The ' percent of overtime = hours with respect to normal hours l
was reported as 25.1% during the month of February, 1990.'
Th'e 12 month ' average percentage of overtime hours with
_ respect to normal hours was reported as 15.8%.
.The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked. has been set at 35% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.
t Adverse Trend:
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours has been increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. 1
~
~ ~ '
~~
'~~ ^
~
b' og 1
50-l-
I!dentified Incidents 1
.q W Incident Reports Opened
'l Incident Reports Closed u : 40-
-m-h e'
.r
'i 30-o
- :' f:
,.n 20-C i
d:
e n-
-l t, 10-i s:
g u
I h
0 E
Mart Apr May Jun Jul Aug-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989-1990 l
l PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator' shows the number of 3rocedural noncompliance' IR's closed < for the : report' ng ' month.
p This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive - category codes. IR's receive their category code when they_are being closed.
During the month of February, 1990, zero procedural
. noncompliance IR's involving maintenance _were 1: i-closed.
This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Item No. 15.
Adverse Trend: None (l
{'
l
\\.1 l
c.
7 f'
p 6'
L t-
- Open.MWO's.
l F
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal' 800-l
'o: 700-
^
i N f'
,t n ',
- u, L
OMl600- -_O-----G-
- ---- G -----G----- G --- --O----- G -----O----- G -----G ---- O 1
b W-00:
4 r'
- s
~
500-N 400-t 300 Jul Aug Sep Oct-Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990-4
. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) g l
This indicator shows' the number of corrective
- non-outage maintenance work orders that are. open at the end of the reporting month..
l'
.The ' goal for this-indicator !s to-have less than l.i; 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of February, 1990, 1:
there 'were 492 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
This indicator was added to the Performance i
Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement
[
Program (SEP) Item No. 36.
Adverse Trend: None 1.
i l
l t -.
a
-5
},;
35-
' ~
I lTotal NPROS Component Failures s
f30-Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures c.
~
25-
- i N'
j[l20-'
i
- u I'
\\
i
. e l' r U;
-r 15-v g e; fs-10-R Mar' ;Apr May.
'Jun Jul.
Aug_
Sep
-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb' 1989 1990 lll l
t 1'
NUMBER OF-NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY Li DATA SYSTEMS ~(NPRDS)
REPORTABLE' FAILURES This indicator' shows.the. total-number of NPRDS l
component failures and:the number of confirmed L
NPRDS, component ' failures. The total number of L
NPRDS. component failures' is based upon the number of failure reports sent to ' INP0. -The number of.
confirmed NPRDS component -failures is= based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted. by-INP0. The difference of these two figures is.the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.
During February, 1990, there was a -total of zero confirmed NPRDS component failures.
Adverse Trend:
None,
h
I
7
- Secondary System CPI:
+- Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5-
+ Industry Upper Quartile 3
1-
+ - - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - - + - - - + -
g GOOD E
+-
I
.5-
.38 E
o_4 _o o
.o_._.o _ o_._.o
- o.._9 N
0 0-l
'88
'89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989-1990 1000-
- Hours Chemistry _is Outside OG Guidelines 757.7 800-I o 600-H u
GOOD r 400-
+
'359.
s.
200-T f
\\
0
'87
'88 Feb Mar Apr 'May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY-The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI),
is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.25 for the month of January. The industry.
l upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20.
The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelin'es, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. In January, 1990, there were 1.9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> outside owners group guidelines. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is no longer available.
L The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the l
reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
l L
Adverse Trends:
None
~
p
{; - 1:
p-p
+
{"
10-
-- Primary System Chemistry _ Out-of Limit o
i 8-P 5
U GOOD r
C-4 e
n t
4-b 1.9 2-0 0
.88
'89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan,
)
1989 1990-PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters, 1
j The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit _ was reported as 0.0% for the month of January.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month.
l Adverse Trend:
None l o
e
-n-Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit 4-- Iridustry Upper Quartile.
40-GOOD--
+
30-H o
u 20-r i
1 s
10-f r
0 0.
O-~O-4 ~~~O-4 O
O--+ 0 ---G--O O
s
.s
.t
'88
'89 Feb Mar Apr May. Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990
~ AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS e
QUTSIDE STATION LIMITS i
The Auxiliary System Chemistry. Hours Outside
~ Station Limits -indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside. the station chemistry l
limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the l.
time needed for data collection and.
l~
evaluation of the chemistry' data' for the station.
l The-auxiliary system chemistry hours outside t
station limits for the month of January, 1990 was reported as zero.
It The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this area.
Adverse Trend: None
, g l
P Number of Out-of-Service Instruments 25
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal
~
iiE_5_5 20-E I
Ei
=
WEjis Nn
.-u3 ggg my 1= ;
m t 15-pe=a
==
==
eas=
D E.-
= --a E5" "
= =
r
=.
y-e u
. -T 3
=-
== : 7c a= an
=
=_
r m
=~~-' n
= =
r~-
ggg e 10- m
' = - - =
==
- ~ ~
~
o n
'~"
~~
f t 55
??M
==_
r i.
_:--------n
_ =_:
=
a==a gg 5
5-E==3
==____.7 iffi
- ma m
=_=.=._
==
==-
. $1]==
Hiis M M
g gllL =--e-----e-----e.----.e g_x E=;
nm z
7-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 I
i IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS j
OUT-0F-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month.
i The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS).
j At the end of February there were a total of 16 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Eleven of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS.
l C.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service is 3.
Adverse Trend:
None l
l ii
.n
' Waste Oil 5
Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste-
- 7500, n.- Halogenated Hazardous Waste I
IOther Hazardous Waste n,
K.6000-
+- j o=f1.
i o
W
- g a.4500-
..r.
s
=a t
m
..l s ' 3000-
[
-1500-p
.I In
..a m.
o Mar
>Apr May-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This. indicator shows the amount ~ f waste oil, o
non-halogenated hazardous -waste, halogenated 3
hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month.
During the month of February, 1600.3 kilograms of waste oil was produced,.0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 67.3 kilograms ~of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous. waste was produced. The high amount of waste oil- )roduced was due to the rebuilding of 4
DG-1 whic.1 is taking place during the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Adverse Trend: None L -
\\
4 p
5000 1
I IMonth' an'm q
Quarter OPPD d
Limit
]
Year
.4000-d j
13000-m R
1 E-
'M~ 2000-
-I R
j 1
1000-0 February 1990 j
,4 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE-l--.
.The. Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Indicator has been Il
~
changed for-the' month-of-February,.1990. This indicator will now~-
. report the maximum individual exposure for the current month..
During the month of January,1990 an:-individual accumulated 214 l
j mrem which was the highest individual exposure at the Fort-i 3-Calhoun Station.
During ~ February,1990 an individual - accumulated 270 mrem which L
was the' highest individual exposure for the month.
The - maximum individual exposure reported to date for-the first
-. quarter of 1990 was 360 mrem.
i The maximum individual exposure to date far 1990 was 360 mrem.
The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165 mrem, received by a Health Physicist.
The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.
Adverse Trend: None
Monthly Contaminations 500-
- Cumulative Contaminations
- G-Fort Calhoun Goal
+ Industry Upper Quartile 400-357 P
e r
GOOD o
n 4
n e
200-157 I
+
O---- O --- G---e. o_-._4__- o__-- O--- G--- O --- G----O O
G- 0 I100-o_.__o_.. 4 9
q.._ o _ o.__ o..._ o 0
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a total of 27 skin and clothing contaminations reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during February, 1990. These contaminations consisted of 7 skin contaminations, 24 clothing contaminations, and 4 combination skin and clothing contaminations.
There has been a total of 39 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1990.
There was a total of 157 skin and cI0 thing contaminations in 1989. The 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This 1990 goal of 150 contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin contaminations.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
This indicator provides information on performance for Safety Enhancement Program (personnel SEP) Item No. 15.
Adverse Trend: None !
1 i
l
- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building i
200-
.l I
BO-
- p 1
e j
[
60-e r
i n
t
)-
40 h
1 GOOD 20-i 1
l O
i-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 l
i DECONTAMINATED AUXILLARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage.
As of February 28, 1990, 75.6% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated.
The decrease in the percentage of the auxiliary building which was decontaminated at the end of February was due to increased activity in the auxiliary building associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Adverse Trend:
None
I IMonthly Radioactive Gas Discharged I
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged l
O-Cumulative Goal l
785 800-GOOD i
+
l C
600-u-
t r
432 I
i 400-s 200-l e....e...g.. 9..e....e....e...g...o...e p.
i 0
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 u
GASEOUS RA)l0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGE;) TO THE ENVIRONMENT s
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. A total of 164.4 curies have been i
released to the environment from January through December of 1989. The Fort Calhoun Stat on goal is 145 curies for this indicator.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated i
~
every six months.
l Adverse Trend: None l
46
f f
R Monthly Radioactive liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged G-Cumulative Goal i
228 231 400-180 C
300 &-+-O-G-O-O-O-G-+-s-G-O
' I
- r u
i 200 GOOD l
+
100-0
'I I
'I I'
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 50-o Mf 40-i
)!30-3 20-no sn 10-S 0
l'
'I Il l'
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environnent totaled 149.1 curies from January through December 1989.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies.
The bottom graph was changed for the month of January, 1990.
This graph now shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste before dilution. The volume of liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment totaled 23.5 million gallons from July through December, 1989. Previously this graph showed the volume of liquid radioactive waste after dilution.
The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Adverse Trend: None -
.-~
[
25-3 Number of Loggable/ Reportable Incidents N
21 N
U 20-b d
6g j
e r
k 15-W S/I '
f 13 W?j n 10-a e h
l 3
i i
f je d
g n
e i
n 5
b' t
[$i1l l%Q s
i p
1 i
0 3
i.
nw 0
0 lz LDV Badges Escort System Key Access Failures Control Control February 1990 l
LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security system failures, security I
badges, security key control, escorting, and access control for the reporting month.
During / reportable the month of February,
- 1990, there were 40 loggable incidents identified. Lost / Unattended badges accounted for 13 of the loggable/ reportable incidents reported during February, 1990. During the same period in 1989, there were 23 l
lost / unattended badges reported. Since January 1, 1990, Security lL Services has issued approximately 407 new security badges. Although there is a measure of predictability for this increase due to the l-amount of security badges issued during this time frame, increased awareness concerning the accountability and control of security badges continues to be stressed.
This indicator provides information on security performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58.
Adverse Trend: None E Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's)
E Security System failures l
ISecurity Badges Security Key Control E Escorting I H Access Control Escort 13
"*"my
'.[SystemFailures52%
t Key Control 3 l
i
\\
i i
Badges 33%
I j
I
! L SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN i.
The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator shows the percentage of incidents concerning the following for the reporting month. These items include; Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security system failures, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control.
Security Items Number of Incidents FEB 1990 JAN 1990 LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) 0 2
Security System Failures 13 20 Security Badges 1
4 Security Key Control 5
0 Escorting 0
4 Access Control 21 0
Total 40 30 This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.
Adverse Trend: None
'15-j..
V N
p l_
u L.
O b
e 10-r o o f
F' a
6 6
6 e
\\;
i 1
5-
'u r
e 3
s J
0 0
0 Alarm System CCTV Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES j
1 The Security System Failures Indicator shows the number of l
incidents concerning the following items for the reporting t
l month. These items include: alarm system.f ailures. CCTV l
failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures.
System Failures Number of Incidents i
l l
Feb 90 Jan 90 Alarm Systems 3
4 CCTV 0
0 Computer 6
6 Terminal 6
2 Door Equipment 6
6 i
Card Reader 6
2 Total 21 20 This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.
Adverse Trend:
None
?.
~
15-
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts l
12-i GOOD
.P 9
4 e
r i
n t
6-n
. 3-O Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 i
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTl (NON-0UTAGE)
This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting' parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage.
The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts increased to 6.1% in February.
As of February 28, 1990, there were a total of 1,114 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 68 of these items on hold awaiting parts.
Adverse Trend:
None 1 -
f
-l
'20-
- Spare Parts Inventory Value
'ia
- g.
F i
9-
,1 on-8-
s
~
_/
s
.Y D
y.
l 1
ar s
6-5 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of February, 1990 was reported as $7,840,165.
Adverse Trend: None e
1 r
i 500-
> y.
~ Spare part, 3,,,,g s
h i
o u
400-I 5
a l
'n d
300-s i
i o
f 200-0 100-a
.i r
. 5 0
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aup Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 1
l-l-
+
SPARE PARTS ISSUED l
+
The value of th med duMng February,1990, tota $ed$fl[,409, s
Adverse Trendt Nonc l
1.
L 4
l l
l l l
l.
2 I#
- Inventory Accuracy i
[.
L 80-l l
j.
1
[
.P.60-e.
r u
C e
" 40-1 20-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i
1990 i
f INVENTORY ACCURACY The Inventory Accuracy Indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January,1990. This indicator
-shows the accuracy of the actual parts l-count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.
i During February, 662 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 662 line items counted 20 items needed count a
l adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the L
month of February was reported as 97%.
't I
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected.
. 1-
}
c 15-O Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available ia-Pick Tickets With Zero Quantity On Hand
(
p-i
{
P 10-rk-c
,eT i
-ni tc k-
- o e S.
-ft 0
1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 l
i l
STOCK 00T RATE The Stockout Rate Indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the percentage of a
the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available and the number of Pick Tickets generated that the MMIS computer system showed a sufficient parts quantity but no parts were available compared i:
to the total number of Pick Tickets generated during the reporting month.
During the month of February, a total of 1,992 Pick i
Tickets were generated. Of the 1,992 Pick Tickets generated, 139 were generated with no parts available and 8 Pick Tickets were generated with the MMIS computer system showing a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were available.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected.
1 ;
t i
r L
1500 O Total Receipts l
@ Spare Parts Receipts t
-O-Standard Stores Receipts X Direct Charge Receipts 1200-N R L
j e 900-O L : e,'
e b '
l i
i r p t 600-g
. o l
g 4
L f
[
X 0
l 300-A i
0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 t
t WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The Warehouse Receipts Indicator has been changed for the l
l month of February,1990. This indicator previously showed the l
total number of warehouse receipts, the total number of non-CQE stock receipts, the total number of CQE stock receipts, the total number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the total number of direct charge CQE receipts for the I
reporting month. Starting with February, this inclicator will now show.the total number of warehouse receipts, the number of I'
spare parts receipts,-the number of standard stores receipts,
- and the number of direct charge receipts during the reporting month.
+
During February the warehouse received a total of 891
-receipts. - Of the 891 receipts received, 61 were spare parts receipts, 338 were standard stores receipts, and 418 were direct charge receipts.
Adverse Trend An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was changed for the month of February, 1990,
_ J J
9
p p
3 4000-
- e Total Issues 4
I 6. Spare Parts Issues
-O-Standard Stores Issues l
-X-Direct Charge Issues j
E 3000-N O
u I.
- g s
i b
5 2000-
.e" Tr' O
. o _
.f 1000-I k
0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 i
WAREHOUSE ISSUES The Warehouse Issues Indicator was changed for the month of February, 1990. This indicator previously showed the total number of warehouse issues, the total number of non-CQE stock issues, the total number of CQE stock issues, the total number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the total number of l
direct charge CQE issues for the reporting month. Starting
-with the month of February, this indicator will show the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts issues, l
I the number of standard stores issues, and the number direct charge issues for the reporting month.
1 R
During February the warehouse completed a total of 2,545 l
issues. Of the 2,545 issues completed, 505 were spare parts-L issues, 1,616 were standard stores issues, and 424 were direct charge issues.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is L
indeterminable due to the fact that it was changed for the l
month of February, 1990.
, \\
b,'
,x
..r.
(! '!; *;, 250
-e-Total Returns l
~~ Spare Parts Returns f
-O-Standard Stores Returns
--M-Direct Charge Returns 200-O
-T:
Po' et r a ' 150-H l
cl o
e
- n !-
i ts.
I s 100-ou
.fe s
50-o l
0 I
F'e'b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE RETURNS The Warehouse Returns Indicator has been changed for the-i month of February, 1990. This indicator previously showed the total number of warehouse returns, the total number of CQE stock returns, and the total number of.
non-CQE returns. Starting with the month-of February, this indicator will show the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns during the reporting month.
During the month of February there were a total of -185 return to stock items. Of the 185 returns, 137 were spare parts returns, 48 were standard stores returns, and zero were direct charge returns.
)
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it'was changed for the month of February, 1990.
o O.
O Material Requests Awaiting Approval
^
L E Material Management Division Contacted to Order i
40-t e
Nr
- 7) f 30-b1 r
p, I'
rR
, f ' ~ 20-L fu V/ 7~~/
10 January 1990 February 1990 March 1990 MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL The Material Recuests Awaiting Approval Indicator was ac ded to the Performance Indicators Report ' for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the total number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the total number of materials requests in which the Material Management Division (MMD) had been contacted to order material at the end of the reporting l
month.
At the end of February, 29 material requests were awaiting approval and 16 material requests had been given to MMD to order material.
t Adverse Trend An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected.
1 1
1 i l
Q
'S.
'10-i 1
IExpedited Purchases i
r 8-L
[
NP
.u u 6-Or
- . bc eh -
ra
$ 4-o fs l
2-O January 1990 February 1990 March 1990 EXPEDITED PURCHASES The Expedited Purchases Indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990.
This indicator shows the number of expedited purchases occurring during the reporting month.
~*
During February, there-were a total of 5 expedited purchases.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this
+
indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected.
l
, 4 4
i CJ-n January 1990
{
E February 1990 March 1990 i
60-
"I u
n o
b V i
Oy40-C o'
'f 5 20-0 Shelf Life CQE Miscellaneous L
INVOICE BREAKDOWN l
L l
The Invoice Breakdown Indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990.
I This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
At the end of February,15 invoices were on hold due to shelf life reasons, 52 invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 48 invoices were on hold l
due to miscellaneous reasons.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for
[
this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected.
'1.....
I-100-
- Percentage of Material Requests for Issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date r
80-t
[ ;
[
r C-e n 40-t
.t 20-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 MATERIAL RE00EST PLANNING The Material Request Planning Indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of January, 1990. This indicator shows the percent of material l
requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need date g
compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.
1 During the month of February a total of 2,316 MR's for issues were re,ceived_ by the l
warehouse. Of the 2,316 total MR's received
+
by the warehouse, 1,050 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this l
indicator is indeterminable due to the fact
[
that three months of data have not yet been collected.
' )
700-
- Total Modification Packages Open l
t r
600-I 500-1 425 425 384 400-
~
+
300-i 200
'87
'88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 i
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications increased by 6 during the monta of February.
CATEGORY DEC 89 JAN 90 FEB 90 l
l Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 66 64 66 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 128 122 113 Design Engr. Backlog 0
0 0
Design Engr. In Progress 95 95 99 Construction Backlog /In Progress 66 65 66 Desian Enor. Update Backloo/In Proaress
_2Q 61
,_61 Total 425 407 413 As of the end of February, 12 additional modification requests have been issued this year. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) i I.
has completed 24 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 37 backlog i
modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews completed is high due to the fact that some of these reviews were reviewed more than once.
Adverse Trend: None 1 i
~'
r s
l l 1emporary Electrical Modifications 100- Temporary Mechanical Modifications
'M
- Total Temporary Modifications Nd 80-
.G-Fort Calhoun Goal ui i
N60-N i
ec W
h
- N ---- d-
-s-----G-----e%y '
O ~&-~ 4
> _ s.~.
1 O
-v <rG-----G-----O n
s i
O Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 M
30-o December 1989 Nf R W January 1990 af 20 R February 1990 bi EM ec 10-Mil oi as io A
5 55 BE HM n
9, 5
0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
> 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCATF0LDING)
The top graph, Number of Temoorary Modifications, was changed for the month of January. It now displays the total number of temporary modifications and a Fort Ca'houn goal. This indicator still displays a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications. There was a total of 61 jumpers installed in the plant at the end of February. Of the 61 installed jumpers, 28 electrical jumpers and 33 temporary mechanical jumpers existed in the Fort Calhoun Station. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 25 total temporary modifications installed in the plant at the end of May, 1990.
The bottom graph, Ace of Temocrary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plant.
This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 71.
Adverse Trend: None _
~..,y.
y
f 20-l 1Open EAR's Closed EAR's
- Number of EAR's > 30 Days Old 15-o Nf u
- $f10-eR t
r' s
5<
i 0--
Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 i
February 1990 ENGINEER"NG ASSISTANCE RE00EST PRLORITY BRFAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of open and closed Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) broken down into priorities at the end of the reporting month.
Along with the priority breakdown, the number of EAR's that are greater than 30 days old are shown for each priority category.
Priority Open Closed
> 30 Davs Old 311 f.th u.D. ffh U.!1 ftk l
Priority 1 5-4 3
4 13 1
Priority 2 12 14 2
2-8 10 Priority 3 13 14 5
5 9
10 Priority 4 5
6 3
2 4
6 Total 35 39 13 12 34 27
+
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that three months of data have not yet been collected..
---a
,, _ - -. - ~
--,--e,------,m,.
e.,
e-,,,--
.-,v,,,--
e-
a
. I i s
120-
-E3-Total ECN's Open
-X-ECN's Opened During the Month I
-+- ECN's Completed During the Month i
N 90-u O.
b
.e l
r
' o 60-lg
,o i
's,/
/
A
,/
/ 'X
.E
/
C l
\\,
l l
\\
30-
/
'Xr"
,/
s j
~
'j
,/
"e
,e
/
c'
~
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1989 1990 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS The Engineering Change Notice Status f
Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of February, 1990. The indicator shows the total number of open Engineering Change Notices (ECN's),
the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month.
l' At the.end of February, 1990, there was a total of 72 open ECN's. During the month of February, 47 ECN's were opened, and 60 ECN's were completed.
L Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this l'
indicator is indeterminable due to the fact l
that this indicator was added to the l
Performance Indicators Report for the month of February, 1990.
1 C '
]
-150-1 IDocument Change
'= Substitute Replacement Item i
E Facility Changes L
120-I
?"5 b
90-
- pg
='
A:::]
~'
I;M
- =
60-
_t_
es lid c=
30-pa mu:
mur-we w
gg Mi is 0--
N Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open During the Month During the Month Received i-l l'
l ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN The. Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators - Re) ort for the month of February, 1990.
This indicator breaks down tie total number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the-reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received by Desi during the I
reporting month into several categories. gn Engineering These categories include:
ECN's requiring a document change to complete, ECN's requiring substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility l
changes to complete.
Total Open Opened Completed Received Document Changes 19 14 11 70 Substitute Replacement 31 18 36 122 Facility Changes 22 15 13 42 Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that this indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the month of February, 1990, -
,5-E 1990 iecordable Injury Frequency Rate l
X 1989 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4.5-t
+- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4-l 3.5-GOOD 3
R d'
.a.2.5-t 4
t e
, ', A,,
X X
2-
~,,
',.+
w,,'
1.5-
'N,/
+.....
.....+,,,4......+.....+....4 1
1-
[
.5-0 l
J2n F'e'b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec January 1990 i
y 0
RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate in column form. The above graph also. includes the 1989 recordable injury cases frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average L
. recordable injury cases frequency rate.
L A recordable injury case is reported if Nuclear Production Division L
personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical I
treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a i
l-year-to-date basis. There was one recordable injury case reported for L.
the month of February. There has been a total of one recordable injury case so far in 1990.
There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in 1988, and eight reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 respectively.
This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety.
EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15andSEPItem26.
Adverse Trend:
The recordable injury case frequency rate was reported as 0.94 for the month of February due to one recordable case being reported. l
(.
l l
E Licensee Event Reports I
IPersonnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Curslative Licensee Event Reports
- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs I
S0-I 46 l
t 39 40 l
i 31 30-6 20-12 10-
[4 f
'87-
'88-
'89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j
1990 L
I-NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S I
l The Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC.
In February, 1990 there were 2 LERs submitted.
[
There were 1 LERs attributable to personnel error.
There have been 4 LERs reported so far in 1990 and these 3 LERs were attributable to personnel errors.
This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Item No. 15.
Adverse Trend: None
'.y
L i
R Nuclear Divisions Turnover Rate
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate t
S-T 4-a r
+
. n o-3-
y e
- r 2
R
?
a t
1 e
1 O
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE i
+
The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown for the last twelve months.
The personnel turnover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last three years.
Adverse Trend: None e
600-E Actual Staffing 561.
542 l
l Authorized Staffing P ' 400-e r
s o
n1 n
l e:
203 212 1 200-l 48 45 i
0-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality i
Division Division and Environmental Affairs l
i STAFFING LEVEL l
The authorized and actual staffing levels l
are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
This indicator tracks staffing (SEP) level for Saf ety Enhancement Program Item Number 24, Adverse Trend: None i
r
> 1
bd i,'
W-100 I
IFebruary 1990 e
.,1 80-
>S:
- R
- 0;
'p -
-a ais:
s.
.3 R.: 40-w t;
i.
o~
20-0
' NRC Administered flRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered f
Generic-Site Specific Requalification
' Requalification-Fundamental Exams Exams Exams Exams 5
'SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO This -indicator has been changed for: the month of -
- February, 1990. - The SR0' License - Examination Pass Ratio. Indicator now shows-the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the e
' number - of' NRC-administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC - administered license requalification exams and the number of 0 PPD administered license requalification' exams, c.
.There were' 2 Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) Generic
'j' Fundamentals exams taken during February.
~
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED-Requal Generic Fund.
Site Spec.
Requal.
DATE L % PASS RATIO.
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO Feb 1990 100 Adverse Trend:
None !
5
________._____.__i__.
Gm hfW
- I f
,w I
IFebruaryL1990 r
IOO-
+
h f::
D.
- 80-
'R-
'[
- 0 i
_h60-L'
~ c...
s
.g.
i
..R 40-
't--
it
{
o.
20-t L
a
'O "1
NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered-Generic Site Specific Requalification
-Requalification-Fundamental Exams.
Exams Exams Exams h,
R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO
.This indicator has been changed for the month of
- g February, 1990..The R0 License Examination Pass-Ratio Indicator now -shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the: number of NRC m'
administered - license requalification exams, and the h.
number of OPPD administered license requalification l
L exams.
There were 5 Reactor Operator (RO) Generic Fundamentals exams taken during February.
w OPPD ADMINISTERED-NRC ADMINISTERED i
Requal Generic Fund.
Site Spec.
- Requal,
=DATE
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO
% PASS RATIO m
j.
Feb 1990 100 Adverse Trend:
None L l l
L
4 r
I' O SRO Exams Administered l
'20 SRO Exams Passed E R0 Exams Administered
!!!:ii!: R0 Exams ~ Passed I
f
' N
!u_
15-
', w. n:
~
'4 :
h 7
s
.e
/
H N r!
),
s n
- o 210-p fi l
(
[
r m
x l
a
~
. m' 5-
[
1s I
5
-=
=
0 l '
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan J
1990 1991 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS o
The !.icense-Candidate Exams indicator has
.been changed for the month of February, 1990. This indicator shows the number-of SRO-and R0 quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally. administered quizzes' and exams are - used to plot the SRO 1
and R0 candidates' monthly progress.
l During the month of February, 1990, 2' SRO l
exams were administered and 2 SR0 exams were passed.
g n yl During February, 13 R0 exams were W
administered and 10 R0 exams were' passed.
Adverse Trend:
None p
3 l
F l l y.
t,.'
l
,s, r
i
}'
!!!! Hotlines Initiated 50-Hotlines' Closed f
- i8i:: Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks q
Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks s.:.
- h40-
.e,
- a;
.b ~ - 3 5-y,;
(O :Jr 30-y ~o =
o p
f x 25-
[
E
[
g 20-h
.t:
E' E
.1. ~ 15-E E
.i.
l E
E i:
' n. 10- E E
E E' l I
E t
L e.
ll E'
E E,
=
s 5
E E
m Mar-Apr May-Jun'
'Ju l ~
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990
- i J
HOTLINES This indicator shows the ' number of Hotlines initiated-during the reporting month, the number'.of Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number.of_Hotlines that r
remain s open and are less than four weeks H
old; and the number of Hotlines that-remain open.and.are older than four weeks old.
During the month of February, 1990, there a
were 13 Hotlines initiated, 16 Hotlines closed, 7 Hotlines that remained open and were less' than four weeks old, and 6 Hotlines that remained open and were older e
than four weeks old.
Adverse Trend: None l -
1 4
t
& Planned Classroom Hours i
IActual Classroom Hours LT -
h 3-0 -
((
j')
,s' n
a g
- (p.
74 P
g~;
g$
g n
.d 1
w 4
X s
2 M
'I-Ob
=_
g if QN Ef$
$a m$
n s
a p{
h
[f"i f$
kl I
vo
' l sjj r
[
jf.
p f
f
{j N.3
$$g g
@s L
4 25 i
1
- 4 H.
y i
AlJ }
o.
i' r.
dll
(~
, ;1 f);g 4
f e
1 3
l 1
u 1
s, y
y 7p s
s l lb l
~
i l4 ia 1-1 j-a
~
l 4-
)
0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov-Dec Jan-l 1989 1990 i
1 i
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number. of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. The planned classroom hours for February were low due to unexpected training which took place associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information.
Adverse Trend:
None I. -.
J[
L_JOperations
.25-Illi Maintenance Chemistry'and Radiation Protection Technical Support
- !:i:i General Employee Training i
!T 20-Other h
,o u
s-r :. '
5 1
os
.m.
i0 Feb Mar. 'Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of -student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical. Support, General' Employee Training, and Other ' training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This' indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to-the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
Total Hours
- )
TRAINING DEC 1989 JAN 1990 Operations 2,260 2,899 Maintenance 2,086 4,435 Chemistry and-1,861 3,886 Radiation Protection Technical Support 2,251 1,739 General Employee Training 2,839 2,802 Other 690 2.072 Total 11,987 17,833 Adverse Trend:
None,
-Er Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours l
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal-
~
15-
, ~-
11.1
- 10.6~
GOOD
- 12-4 7.1 -
9-
.-y g.. 9...e... e.__ e.. 9. _e_..e....g...e...e __ _ o 6-1..
7 i,
3-
.O I
0
'87; '88
'89
'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct Nov Dec
-1990 t
i c
VIOLATIONS:PER-1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection' reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the
~
number of violations. and the number of. inspection hours from the months of October, 1989, through
-January, 1990.-
This indicator is one month behind the re)orting month due to the time involved with - collect ng and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator
.[
was reported as 2.7 for the month of January, 1990..
1 F
- c..
There were 2 violations cited for the month of January. There have been a total of 2 violations
-cited with 374 inspection hours in 1990, i
The goal for 'the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.2.
Adverse Trend:
None P,.
--.- - L- --.-
a.
. ;.g
- Total _ Outstanding. CAR's i
Outstanding CAR's > Six' Months Old e.;
Outstanding CAR's-That Are Modification Related f
200-150-
- wj N fI
., p.
JaC.100-I b A -.
1
- eR:
.r *'
g Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb-e 1989 1990 h
i OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS The. Outstanding Corrective Action Reports Indicator has been changed. for the month of
- January '1990. Deficiency and Quality-Reports i.
(DR/QR's): have-been renamed-to Corrective L'
ActionReports(CAR's),
j This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports
'(CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the ll number of outstanding CAR's that are L
modification related.
As 'of the end of February, 1990 there were 131 outstanding CAR's reports, 49 CAR's that L
are. greater than six months old, and 12 CAR's that are modification related.
i Adverse Trend:
None 4 -
a
._.--.----_-------._-=z_.m=_=_------------
m Ivyp-
_7 g
.SALP FUNCTIONALRAREA c CAR's CAR's' VIOLATIONS LER'S~
' VIOLATIONS TLER(Sj A. Plant Operations:
11' 8
~2 2H(1) 0~
'0i il :,(1).
~
'B. Radiological Controls-30
-1 2'
1 14 (1) 2 '(1) 0.
~0 C. Maintenance /-
140 8
2 10:
35 (9) 3..(2) 2 (2)-
- 0?
Surveillance
~
D. Emergency 8
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Preparedness
~
E. Security
.26 2
6 10 0
0 0
2' i
F. Engineering /
134 2
7 7
18-(7) 0 0
1-(1)
Technical i
Support G. Safety Assessment /
68 0
1 0
4 (1) 0 0
0 Quality j
Verification I
H. Other 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 Total 417 13 26 31 73 (19) 5 (3) 2 (2) 4 (2) l CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED This indicator has been changed 'for the month of February, 1990. Deficiency Reports and Quality Reports (DR/QR's) have been renamed to Corrective Action Reports - (CAR's). The above ~ matrix shows' the number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) issued by the Nuclear Services Division'versus the number of Significant CAR's' issued by the Nuclear. Services Division versus the number of l
violations issued by the-Nuclear Regulatory Commission ~(NRC) for the Fort Calhoun Station in.1989 and 1990. Included in-- this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) issued by the station each year. ' The number of NRC violations reported are one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved.in collecting and processing the violations.
In February, 1990, there were 19 CAR's issued, 3 Significan't CAR's issued, and 2 LER's issued.
During January 2 NRC violations were issued. Of' the 2 violations' issued zero were attributable' to-personnel error. The monthly distribution of. CAR's, Significant CAR's, NRC violations, and LER's are shown in parentheses.
This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). Items 15, 20 and 21'.
u....
. ~
~ __
-ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
. Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations issued - by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies 1
discovered: at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station.
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
.' Security
- 1. February 1985 Site Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.
s A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed.
[
- 2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation.
l No civil penalty was assessed.
- 3. May 1986 Radiological Protection Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.
A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.
- 5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency L
Modification - Level III Violation.
E A civil penalty of $50,000 was assecsed.
- 6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and. Lack of Health Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation' Areas Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.
- 7. February 1988 Design-Evaluation, Design Implementation and Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of 1
Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 i
Level III Violations.
L A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.
(
- 8. May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program'- 2 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed.
L I.
L
[j 4
.j k!i ESCALATED' ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (CONTINUED)
L i
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT i
- 9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, l
B SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety 1
Analysis for Operability - Level III violation.
A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
)
- 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted-in a response.
No civil penalty was assessed.
11.': November 1989-Two. instances of safeguards ' documents left unattended outside the plant's protected area. Instances of inadequate package and vehicle searches.
Inadequate measures to compensate for degraded security systems Level III violation. A civil penalty of $25,000 was assessed.
- 12. November 1989 Inadequate testing of a turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump - Level III violation. No civil penalty was assessed.
e J dt 4
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and management meetings-held with the NRC.
RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS-
- 1. January 1989' One management meeting was held with the NRC in January.
This meeting was held concerning the new site Security Plan.
- 2. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conf erence was held cencerning the Radiological Protection Program.
.3. February.1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 4. April 1989 One-Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in April. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning Security.
- 5. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC _ in May.
This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 6. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcement - Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.
- 7. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems.
- 8. September 1989 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in September. One management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). The other management meeting concerned the Committee Review of GenericRequirements(CRGR).
'n 4
ENFORCEMENTCONFERENCES~ANDMANAGEMENTMEETINGS(CONTINUED')
'9. January.1990 One Enforcement Conference' was held with the NRC in January.- This' Conference was held concerning two topics. One l topic concerned the simultaneous-isolation of. two Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchangers. OPPD has been notified by the NRC that
-this topic has been classified as a Level IV violation. The other topic concerned. ST-CEA-1. This Surveillance Test could have taken both diesel s'
generators out of. service at the same time. OPPD has been notified that this topic has been classified as anon-CitedViolation(NCV).
- 10. January 1990
.One management meeting was held with the' NRC in i
January. This management meeting.was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP).
-11. February 1990 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This meeting was held to brief the NRC concerning the status of the Fort Calhoun Station.
i f
. 4
?,
- 1. c
~
i SIGNIFICANT. ITEMS OF INTEREST l
This section is intended to provide information on events-whict are
- significant; tot the Fort Calhoun Station and will give'a "Seada-up"'
look at what is schedu' led in the coming months.
An INP0 Assist Visit concerning Outage ManagementLis planned for March:12 through March 24, 1990.
The-NRC Safety Enhancement Prograni (SEP) inspection is scheduled for April, 1990.
The-1990L INPO Plant Evaluation is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990.
The 1990 INP0 : Corporate Evaluation is scheduled for July 9 through July 13, 1990.
The INP0-0 PPD Simulator Evaluations are scheduled for July, 1990.
I:-
l ~
The NRC: Emergency Operating Procedures (E0P) Review is scheduled to start on August 21, 1990.
The NRC Maintenance Inspection Team follow-up review has.been rescheduled until November, 1990, r
t l'
l l
u I
'.g.
s
~
n FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS j '
AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS c
r This indicator -tracks the total number of outstanding corrective-
- non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months.
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to.the total number'of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders.
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter i
to be back within limits.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUC10R) HOURS, The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom
~ hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported.
DATLY THERMAL OUTPUT The _ daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.
'0IESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG)- unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker.
Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the-last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio.of the number of successful runs to the number ef demands, for each individual DG unit.
' A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time l'
period of 60 minutes.
Q, 1
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
J L
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (CONTINUE 0}.
A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid' test.
1 The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of i
the failures and the successful runs.
l This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being-applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station.
DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) 1 This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26.
DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)
The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue.
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VEST (EAR's) PRIORITY BREAK 0OWN The number of open and closed EAR's broken down into priorities at the end of the reporting month.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAKDOWN The breakdown of the total number of open ECN's, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed -during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during the reporting month into three categories. These categories include; 1) document changes are required to complete the ECN's, 2)
L substitute or replacement items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are required to complete the ECN's.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS L
The number of ECN's that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's that are completed during the reporting month.
l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) l EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment. forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the-mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment
. failures in that period.
E001 VALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at maximum capacity.
EXPEDITED PURCHASES The number of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE-This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e.,
the unit is available but not in service.
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This_ indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate, Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.present Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days.
GASE0US RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.
l.
l FORT-CALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)-
f
! GROSS HEAT RATE i
Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in
~ British ' Thermal-Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross i
electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH).
HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED
.The-amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated' hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun. Station each month.
HOTLINES' The' number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a - given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of
-receipt of the Hotline.
HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation.
Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power.
The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in LtheSecondarySystemandthePostAccidentSamplingSystem(PASS).
-INVOICE' BREAKDOWN The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent
~
(radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River.
. LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The total number of security incidents for the reporting month.
4 I')'
o,
C FORTCALHOUN'PERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED) a MAINTENANCE WORK' ORDER BACKLOG Theinumber of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain I
open at.the end of the reporting month. This-indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) 4 Item No. 36.-
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This : indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by_several categories that remain open at the end of the reporting l
month.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME
'The - percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for b
maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.
MATERIAL REOUESTS' AWAITING APPROVAL The number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the number of material requests in which the Material Management ' Division (MMD) has been contacted to order the material for the material requests.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL ~ RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation
. received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR - PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPROS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS component failures (confirmed and' possible) and the number of confirmed NPRDS. component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear 7'
i Operations INP0). Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure repo(rts that have been accepted by INP0. Possible NPRDS com)o
- failures are based upon failure reports that are still under rev'ew by INPO.
NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INP0 and R
implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.
l:
l' L
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS s
A-control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered. as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered.
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. -
^
- NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel t
performance for SEP Item No. 15.
NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in-NRC inspection reports for the. Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC ins)ection hours. The violations are reported in the year. that the inspect on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance.
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS-The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the I
issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update.
Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved.
Modification Requests Being Reviewed This category includes:
1.)
Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed 2.)
Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) 3.)
ModificationRequestsbeing(reviewedbythe Nuclear Projects Committee NPC) 1 y
^
l
.FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
(
These Modification Requests may be reviewed several-times l
before they are ap) roved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some -
1
- of these Modificat on Requests are returned to Engineering for
[
more information, some approved for evaluation, 'some approved.
for study, and some approved for planning.- Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined,. these:
Modification Requests may be approved for_ accomplishment with a j
year assigned.for construction or they may be cancelled.
All of these different phases require review.
s,
Design Engineering Backlog
.I Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PED has not started design work.
Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress.
Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has' l'
begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC).
l Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification. Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
PERCENT OF CAR'S GREATER'THAN SIX MONTHS OLD This-indicator displays the percentage of Corrective' Action Reports (CAR's) that are greater than six months old.
-r PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) 3 p
Collective radiation exposure-is the total external whole-body -dose P
received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors)
I during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD).-Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem.
. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE h
The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is p
a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company, and part-time employees o
are not considered in turnover.,
y 4
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is: defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the-month: that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a
. grace period equal _to 25 percent of the scheduled interval.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS O'T OF LIMIT J
The percent of hours out of limit are for-six primary chemistry parameters
. divided by the total number of hours possible for the. month. The key parameters used are:. Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride,-and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used.-
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCEl The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance. This I
indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15.
- RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and l
calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance i
and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours.
1 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATEl I
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15 and SEP Item 26.
R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS-This indicator shows the number of SR0 and/or R0 quizzes and exams that
-l are administered and passed each month.
- R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO 1
The R0- license examination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic l
Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered license L
requalification exams.
> SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX L
- The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the.most likely cause of deterioration of the steam i
- generators.-The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power.
L t
4
l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUED) i r
'The following equation is how the CPI is calculated:
CPI =((Ka/1.2)+(Na/20)+(C1/20)+'(SO/20)+(0/10))/5 4
2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of-Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator-Blowdown Sodium Concentration C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration SO4 = Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 02 = Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration SECURITY INCIDENTS' This indicator shows a ' percentile breakdown of-the types of Security incidents for the reporting month.
The following items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator.
LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's)
Incidents related to the use of LDV's, e.g. keys lef t in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys.
Security Badges Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges.
Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g.
improper control or escort of a visitor (s).
Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures.
Security Key Control Incidents involving Security key control, e.g.- lost Security keys, Security keys removed from site, or failure to return Security keys. This type of incident does not reflect incidents concerning LDV keys.
i
]
' a e
FORT'CALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINVED)
SECURITY INCIDENTS (CONTINUED)-
Access Control
- Incidents. involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages,. and vehicles, e g.
failure to properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction of contraband or prohibited items into the.
Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items.
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The number of Security incidents concerning alarm systems failures,- CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures.
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALVE The dollar value-of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.'
SPARE PARTS ISSVED
'The dollar value of the s)are parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc.-
SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO
.The SR0 license examination pass ratio for NRC. administered - Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administe' red license re requalification exams. qualification exams, and OPPD administered license 1
STOCK 0VT RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting 1
month, the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month with no parts available, and the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month in which the MMIS computer system showed a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were available.
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of_ temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.
Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the-plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. 1
p FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
' TEMPORARY-MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
\\
Jumpers ' and blocks-which are installed for Surveillance Tests, i
Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless
.tle jumper or - block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not
. considered.as temporary modifications.
t Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered-as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the 7
EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the-drawings.
-TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry - and Radiation Protection,- Technical Support, General Employee' Training, and 0ther training conducted for the Fort Calhoun. Station.
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and. clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel
-performance for SEP Item No. 15.
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This -indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams-(reactor protection system logic-actuations) that occur while.the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows:
Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.
Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal'may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the. manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.
Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone..
l r
-FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS l
This' indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system
- actuations:
the number of unplanned EmergencyL Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation-setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal-the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus
. An unplanned ~ safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint g
for a safety (system is reached or when a' spurious or inadvertent signal
)
is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in.the system is actuated.
. Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test'
~
or evolution.
The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system,. the low pressure injection system, or the safety s
- injection tanks.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final. form ready for burial, during a given period. It
- is calculated ' using the amount of waste actually shipped for dis aosal, 1
- plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The-volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in i
final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms Generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning 1
materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other. material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing.
e WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues,
.the number of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during u
the reporting month.
a.
n
I
-FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCE_PARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)'
..y WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS-The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock' receipts, the number of CQE stock' receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts' which occurred during the reporting month.
WAREHOUSE RETURNS The. total number of warehouse returns, the total number of CQE stock i
returns, and the total number of non-CQE stock returns which : occurred -
L during the reporting month.
y, L
r 1-.
t I
f 9
)
4 b -i
4 BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS
- This section will ' explain the_ basis used-in establishing' the: 1990 performance goals-FORCED OUTAGE RATE'AND E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR 4
The Forced Outage: Rate (FOR)' and Equivalent Availability ~ Factor: (EAF) goals have.been. established from 1990 to 1992. The following table. is a -
breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three.
3
-- year s. -
STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED-OUTAGE PLANNED c.
ON LINE OUTAGE' TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR-
,yLA_R (HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS}
(HOURS)
,L),
(Ss) 2 1990(*)
6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 l
1991(*)
6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0
0 8760 92.9 2.7
(*)~RefuelingOutageYears UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The '1990 goal. for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at-one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the_past four years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established
-at.zero..The Fort.Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last six years.
1 GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate. goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at'10,200 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTU /KWH for the month of January, 10,450 BTU /KWH for the month of February, 10,325 BTU /KWH for the month of May, 10,225 BTU /KWH for the month of June,-
i 10,325 BTU /KWH.for the month of July,10,250 BTU /KWH for the month of August,L10,125 BTU /KWH for the month of September, 10,050 BTU /KWH for the
- month of October, 10,000 BTU /KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTV/KWH for the month of December.,
---a
Basis FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS (CONTINUED)
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for apartaimately one to two fuel pin f ailures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin f ailures, there are a number of ANF assemblies antering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probabihty of fuel failure. The Failed fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximatel four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.y PERSONNEL RADIATION Exp0SURE (CUMULATIVE)
The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man-rem.
This goal was based on 234 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man-rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.
DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE The Disabling injury'ost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one during 1990.
4
-100-
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM TO (MWH)
(MWH)
Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/14/90*
- - Planned Dates
-101-
a g FORT CALHOUN STATION l t, OPERATING CYCLES AND REF HLING 6UTAGE DATES (CONTINU D)
\\
PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE TO (MWH)
(MWH)
EVENT FROM Cycle 13 05/14/90*- 09/28/91*
Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/91*- 11/22/91*
~
Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93*
Fourteenth Refueling 02/12/93*- 05/06/93*
- l Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94*
Fifteenth Refueling 09/30/94*- 11/26/94*
- - Planned Dates
-102-
FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven items are the current production and operation
- records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 1. First Sustained Reaction............. August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August 25, 1973
- 3. Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973
~ 4. Achieved Full Power (100%)............May 4, 1974
- 5. Longest Run (477 days).............. June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27,1988
- 6. Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH).0ctober 1987
- 7. Most Productive fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH).... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11)
O
-103-
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA $0VRCES U
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Schmitz Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Henning CAR's issued Versus NRC Violations issued Orr/Blome Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Schmitz Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Gundal Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay Engineering Assistance Requests Priority Breakdown Jaworski/Middaugh Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera Equipment forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray o
Hazardous Waste Produced Peterson/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Peterson/Renaud Invoice Breakdown Willrett/fussell
-104-
y PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)
Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage)
Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Work Order B eakdown Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Schmitz Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Trausch Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Blome Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Blome Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)
Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Henning Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)
Peterson/ Smith Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams Gasper /Howard R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Henning
-105-
l h
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE 4
(CONTINUED)
Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Weerner Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell Temporary Modifications Jaworski\\ Turner Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Armagno Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Breuer Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell O
i
-106-
4g REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102,
- Performance Monitoring Management Information" i
IEEE Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 O
D
-107-
..