ML20011A718

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900703/81-01 on 810914-17 & Notice of Nonconformance
ML20011A718
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/14/1981
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Schmidt H
ASCO/DELTA (FORMERLY DELTA CONTROLS & RTE-DELTA CORP.
Shared Package
ML20011A719 List:
References
REF-QA-99900703 NUDOCS 8110290344
Download: ML20011A718 (2)


Text

-

.w OCT 141931 Docket No. 99900703/81-01 aQfh%-

I,

og72 S eg7' RTE Corporation

-j J

Switchgear Division y'

D'. ' % o N

  • P ATTH: Mr. H. Schmidt Deputy Acting Manager Stockton, California 95201 D,r,l v,,y',#e

705 N. Carlton Avenue n

~

Gentlemen:

This mfers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. Ross L. Brown, of this office, on September 14-17,1981, of your facility at Stockton, California, associated with the fabrication of generator control panels and to the discus-sion of.our findings *.#1th you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. -The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer 4

are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or j

service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you j

know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility i

f2r the quality of specific products, cogonents, cr services procured from i

others. You should, therefom, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective i

corrective action in response to their findings.

i Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed mport. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and mpresentative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the j

inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program

)

failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written state-ment containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items. (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurmnce, and (3) the date your cormctive actions and preventive measums were or will be cogleted. Consideration may be given to extending-your response time for good cause shown.

Sha U,WSAk, h'//

O 99900V703

~

/

....CS. M.........CS....

...VIB.

.......... I

......I ES. k i r.d. o..T.,~ p.n.s..

o"*>

sum = >

RLBrown/nh UPotapon JEGagi olli q y-p

....w,g. ai -

--mfq fm f

~

- NirC FORM 318 f 480) NRCM OuO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

+

RTE Corporation The respormes directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance proce-dures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Coundssion's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection mport will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.. If your receipt of this letter nas been delayed such that less than seven days are available for your reviewt please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.

Consistent Nith Section 2.790(b)(1), arty such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the infomation which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the infomation should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).

The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

1 Should you have any questions concoming this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

4 Sincerely,

]

s' Original Signed bya

p. p.OTAPOVS*'

U1 dis Potapon, 'nief Vendor Inspection Branen

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Nonconfomance 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900703/81-01 3.

Inspection Data Sheets - Pages 1-5 bec:

Chief,V&SPB,DR&RRI,HQS(Reinmuth)

IE Files AE00 4

l NMSS QAB NRC:PDR Reg. Directors, I, II, III, & V

.1FGa ni l ar in. RTV l

~

"'c 4 i*"""^"'>

.DATEh n ac ronu n n o_.o ' ""'."-. ". _. _ _.. _O.F_ F_ I.C I A_ L R, _E C_ O R_ D_ _C O_P,Y_ _.

_,