ML20011A380

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900356/81-01 on 810803-07 & Notice of Nonconformance
ML20011A380
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/11/1981
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Duncan C
HUSKY PRODUCTS, INC.
Shared Package
ML20011A381 List:
References
REF-QA-99900356 NUDOCS 8110090373
Download: ML20011A380 (2)


Text

~

o o

v 4

1 1931 g4 Docket No. 99900356/81-01 g['g h g2 liusky Products,.Inc.

i Subsidiary of Burndy Corporation gCI g ATTN: Mr. C. F. Duncan t4 gOlh &

Quality Assurance Manager d

= %=,

3 7405 Industrial Road g.

Florence, Kentucky 41042 9,

Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA program conducted by Mr. Ross L. Brown of this office on August 3-7, 1981, of your facility at Florence, Kentucky, associated with the manufacture of electrical table support systems and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. J. P. Dunne and members of his staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confinn that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements ir Josed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others. You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licenseu or his agents, nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program Tailed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

h00903738109;4 9990$9ENVHUGd PDR o" o.

JM.

yIB RIV.

W

" "

  • RBrown/dm.

.UPotapo s.

....J liardo.

.JI ollins.

I 9/8/.81

.9/. h/.61.

.F.61

.9/pRl.

..f.._ _ _

7 enc rone aia noso, uncu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Husky Products, Inc.

2 The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance pro-ceourcs of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 PL 96-511.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Comission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the HRC's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 dvs from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such infonnatien.

If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.

Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).

The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Hotice of Honconformance 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900356/31-01 3.

Data Sheet pages 1 through 4 bcc:

IE/V&SPB (Reinmuth)

IE Files AE0D NMSS l

NRC:PDR QAB REG. Directors I, II, III & V JEGagliardo, RIV omer)

-sun ~4ue)

O ATE f j

.p

,j nac rono un,io o nac" "

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY