ML20010F614
| ML20010F614 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1981 |
| From: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Lempges T NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109100433 | |
| Download: ML20010F614 (2) | |
Text
l
_ 2r Ha**r ceY w~
em ne.1cy r u.m.o 2 4 AllG 1981 Docket No. 50-220 in g
a
'fl =
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN: Mr. T. E. Lempges
- s-'
=
[. bJL' h
Vice President Nuclear Generation SEP 101981
- 300 Erie Boulevard West 2,
e xas C 8
/
Syracuse, New York 13202 4
so m *
- S N
N Gentlemen:
fs M, s' di By letter dated April 24, 1981, I transmi o you a copy of a letter from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) dated April 23, 1981 and its attached letter from FEMA to the New York State Disaster Preparedness Commission dated April 6, 1981. The attachments to the April 6, 1981 letter listed numerous deficiencies in the New York State and local emergency response plans for the area around your reactor site.
The enclosed letter from FEMA dated August 19, 1981, refers to the deficiencies in the aforementioned April 6,1981 letter.
FEMA concludes that "the present state of planning is generally adequate to carry out the responsibilities of the State and local government in the case of an accident at these sites". We therefore conclude that this issue has been resolved satisfactorily.
Sincerely, Cricinal Signed By:
C. rf. GKtER Boyce H. Grier Director
Enclosure:
As stated I
RI:DEFOS RI:DEPOS RI RI DEP DIR RI: -
.CTOR Snyder/ gwc Sm Br4 er Al Gr er V
8,'2 /81 g y 0F ALJECCRD'OPY d
j J
4 C
.I I
i l
0109100433 810824 PDR ADOCK 05000220 M %g F
Niagara Mohawk Corporation 2
2 4 AllG 1981 cc w/ encl:
T. Perkins, General Superintendent, Nuclear Generation T. Roman, Station Superintendent R. Abbott, Operations Supervisor E.B. Thomas, Jr., Esquire Honorable Hugh L. Carey, Governor of New York State of New York, Departt.ent of Health V. Forde, Acting Regional 31 rector, FEMA Chief Executive, Oswego County J. Dunkelberger, New York State Energy Office W. C. Hennessey, Chairman, Disaster Preparedness Commission J. Dickey, Director, REP Division, FEMA Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
State of New York iSRC Resident Inspector bcc w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurren:es)
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i
l L
~
r
,g& y FederalEmergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 s
=
J.
August 19s 1981 1
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director Division of Emergency Pr ness r
nd Enfo cement i
Office of Inspectioptory U. S. Nuclear Regu a
'mi ion
\\gred ass Division Acting Director for.
FROM:
Radiological Emergene epa Status of Off-Site Planning in Ne York State
SUBJECT:
In previous correspondence you requested that this office furnish a statement
,t 3
on the status of planning in New York State involving the Nine Mile Point, Ginna and Indian Point sites which were subject to NRC enforcement Fitzpatrick,I am pleased to report on these facilities as follows.
3 p actions.
1981, which listed deficiencies in the relationship Our letter of April 6, between the State of New York and the site specific counties, has been partially Chapter answered by the enactment of new legislation by the State of New York.
now eliminates the inconsistencies in direction and 708 of the New York Codeincorporated the provisions of Chapter 708 into the control.
New York has planc and will ensure that any remaining inconsisterscies are corrected.
Thess provisions will be reflected in the site specific plans for the sites listed above.
FEMA Fe; ion II is working with the State on the resolution of the health physics items.:.d we have assurance that these deficiencies will be addressed by the time Fitzpatrick will exercise September 15, exercises for these sites are completed.
- (
1981, Ginna November 5,1981, and Indian Point March 3,1982.
i:
Formal plans reviews by the Regional Assistance Committees are now underway with Fitzpatrick/Nine Mile Point as the first priority.
FEMA Region II has now i
received the plans for Ginna and Indian Point.
s and our general knswledge cf the State of pIsnning Based on this information, for the four sites, FEMA believes that the present state of planning is generally to carry out the responsibilities of the State and. local government in 6
accident at these sites.
A judgement of the overall adequacy adequate of preparedness cannot be provided until the results of the exercises are evaluated.
.the case of an e
e
.W:
)
'34y
- =s
(
T h.}