ML20010A518

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-373/81-24 on 810518-0626.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20010A518
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle 
Issue date: 07/29/1981
From: Heishman R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20010A519 List:
References
NUDOCS 8108110501
Download: ML20010A518 (2)


See also: IR 05000373/1981024

Text

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

o

UNITED STATES

~g

8-

y'

NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION

$

,i

REGION lli

e

7M ROOSEVELT ROAD

Y'g.....

GLEN ELLYN,ILLIN;is M137

-

JUL ?,9 198t

ll

'

l

Docket No.

50-373

8

\\

-

g(; 1.0 %[

Commonwealth Edison Company

,

gg

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed

d

,

Vice President

f

Post Office Box 767

9,

,s

,

'

Chicago, IL 60690

/

qs.'

.

,

Centlemen:

1

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. R. D. '4alker,

S. E. Shepley, R. D. Lanksbury, and R. Schulz of this office on May 18 through

June 26, 1981, of activities at the LaSalle County Nuclear Station, Unit 1, authorized

by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-99, to the discussion of our findings with

Mr. R. H. Holyoak at the conclusion of the inspection, and to the management meeting

held in the NRC RIII Offices on June 26, 1981 between Mr. James G. Keppler and others

of this office, and Mr. J. J. O'Connor and others of his staff.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the

inspection. 'Jithin these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews

with personnel.

No items of roncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course

of this inspection,however, during this inspection follow-up activity described

in paragrcph 2. of the enclosed inspection report was performed to establish

whether corrective action verbally committed to by por staff as a consequence

of a Level IV noncompliance identified in Appendix A, Item 2.,

of inspection

report 50-373/81-07 (assigned inspection report Open Item Number 373/81-07-01)

was being adequately implemented. Our inspection had previously determined that

this item of noncedpliance required no resp 'nse from your organization based upon

these verbal commitments.

The follow-up activity performed revealed that the

conditions described in this item of noncompliance still exist and therefore, a

written response, submitted under oath or affirmation, is required, to the item of

noncompliance identified in inspection report 50-373/81-07 as inspection report

Open Item Number (373/61-07-01).

,

.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this

letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the

NRC's Public Document Room.

If the enclosures contain any information that you or

your' contractors believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is

necestary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within seven (7) days from

the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and hg

(b) submit within twenty-five (25) days frcm the date of this letter a written

,5

lJ

8108110501 010729

.

PDR ADOCK 05000373

O

PDR

',

, - .

es

w

,-

,

,

Q

f

9

()

O'

-

(f

Commoc. wealth Edison Company

-2-

'JUL ? .o fo AI

application to this office to withhold such information. Section 2.790(b)(1)

requires that any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit

executed by the owner of the information which identiff.es the document or

part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the

reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be

withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the state-

ment to address with specificity the cor491derations listed in 10 CFR 2.790 (b)

(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as

possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you

in this regard within the specified periods noted above, a copy of this letter,

the onclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the Public

Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

C

y'

!-

R. F: Heishman, Acting Director

Divisf.on of Resident & Project

Inspection.,

i

Enclosure: IE Inspection

Report No. 50-373/81-24

cc w/ enc 1:

Mr. L. O. DelGeorge, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

Mr. L. J. Burke, Site

Constructica Superintendent

Mr. 7

E. Quaka, Quality

Assurance Supervisor

Mr. R. H. Holyoak, Station

Superintendent

Mr. B. B. Stephenson

Project Manager

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector, RIII

Mary Jo Murray, Office of

Assistant Attornay General

o-> ..a m ...... ... Rux....pd.. a t u ..... g . a.m..../...

. .... . ........

........ .

......

. ....

.f.

xm . . . . . . . :. . . .

.uunm..r... nncr..

-A

..ac1manu...N..

................\\

... ..... ... . . .

...

. . . .

......... . ....

. d ... ./"..q..g.3..

omp

. . . ... .... . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

.

... ...... .. .... .

. ..

.....

. . .... .

................... .

iNRC FORM 318 ttO,8N NRCM O2dO

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

wm m2n2$