ML20010A057
| ML20010A057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1981 |
| From: | Grimer B, Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Coleman R SAN CLEMENTE, CA |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010A058 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108100493 | |
| Download: ML20010A057 (2) | |
Text
1 TERA IE FILE COPY
_ -.7 Docket Nos. 50-2,06 g 2 3 1961 50-h
,.~.s i
i&>1N Mr. R. J. Coleman hb Director of Fire Protection k ';p05 g r City of San Clemente i 1 100 Avenida Pewaiso San Clemente. California 92622
Dear Mr. Coleman:
/h R l iG i
I have reviewed your reaction to the FEM interim findings and determinations relating to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station contained in your June 11.1981 letter to me. Federal regulations at 10 CFR 50.47 require that no operating license for a nuclear power reactor will be issued unless a finding is made by NRC that the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures t
can and will be taken in tha event of a radiological emergency. The regulation states that NRC will base its finding on a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEM) findings and determinations as to whether State and local plans are adequate and capable of being implemented, and the NRC l
assessment of the applicant's plans.
1 To carry out the NRC licensing responsibility. I asked FEM Headquarters i
to specify which of the indicated deficiencies must be removed to allow _
a FE M finding of adequate offsite preparedness. Furthermore. I requested that FEM provide NRC with a schedule for the actions FEM is planning in order to reassess the offsite preparedness. I also asked FEM to take into account a letter received from Mr. Ken Baskin of the Southern California Edison Company which outlined the deficiencies identified by FEE. summarized their planned actions and established a schedule for curing the deficiencies.
I understand that SCE met and reached an understanding with all affected local jurisdictions and FEM Region IX in the development of their action i
plan. I subsequently have received a letter from FEM Headquarters which endorses the course of action laid out in the SCE letter. I believe that this matter is well on its way to resolution and I thank you for your efforts and cooperation.
omcr >I
" " ~
0855 U5'U5 N 5' SURNAME >i.. eoa ooacx 03000206 can k F
PDR j.
.....p.......
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
/
Mr. R. J. Coleman Your letter indicated that you intend responding to the FEM comments. We would appreciate your forwarding a copy of your reispense to us.
Sincerely, Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Office of Inspection and Enforcement DsRB I t r to John Dickey. FEE,
ee
]
dtd. 6/18/81 IE Files 2.
Letter from Southern California Edison Company dtd. 6/26/81 kRe a n 3.
Letter from FEMA dtd. 7/14/81 VStello RCDeYoung cc w/ enclosures:
John Dickey, FEM hc" rtz R. Jaske, FEMA p agano Ron Sandwina, FEMA Cynthia Ferguson, Public Works, he' c rs San Juan Capistrano
$W/ incoming Jim Alexander, State Office of Emergency Services Local PDR (w/ incoming)
Dr. Mary Frances Reed, state DEisenhut Office of Emergency Services HRood Burt Turner, County Office of SNowicki Emergency Services, Emergency Management Division Bud Jackley, Edison Company fe n-w' w
O F FIC E ),,EPL B..
. 0EP.; pf.013, R.
~ " ~ ~ ~ +..d.
. e s P..C.?Paslan.9.......S sa d z...
7/... / 81..... 1!....I81.......?L..B1.........1918.1...
unc rono us oo o, unc" "
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY