ML20009G570
| ML20009G570 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1981 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | John Miller GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009G551 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108040434 | |
| Download: ML20009G570 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000321/1981010
Text
,
~
.
"
OFFICIAL COPY
'
-
o,
UNITED STATES
!
7,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ ,y ) ,,
cE
REGION 11
,
o;
8
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W. SUITE 3100
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
JUN
41981
w
Georgia Power Company
ATTN:
J. H. Miller, Jr.
Executive Vice President
270 Feachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Gentlemen:
Subject: Report Nos. 50-321/81-10 and 50-366/81-10
This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. J. R. Wray of this office
on April 13-17, 1981, of activities authorized by NRC Operating License Nos.
DPR-57 and NPF-5 for the E. I. Hatch facility.
Our preliminary findings were
discussed with Mr. C. T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager, at the conclusion of
the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the
enclosed inspection report.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of
selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel, and observations t>y the inspector.
During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under ycur license
appear to violate NRC requirements.
These items and references to pertinent
requirements are listed in the Notice of Violation enclosed herewith as Appen~
dix A.
Elements to be included in you* response are delineated in Appendix A.
In a telephone conversation on July 3,
1980, Mr. G. F. Head of your office
informed Mr. R. C. Lewis of this office that one of the actions to be taken to
'
alleviate deficiencies in your contamination control program identified during
the Health Physics Appraisal was to require individuals who are exiting any area
where protective clothing was required, to perform or receive a whole body con-
i
i
tamination survey prior to exiting.
In your letter of October 6,1980, you
'
stated that the requirement for the whole body contamination survey was being
emphasized in the initial orientation courses and re-emphasized in health
physics training lectures. You further stated that the supervisory staff and
health physics staff would be more diligent in enforcing this requirement.
During this inspection, thirteen of fifteen workers were observed removing
protective clothing after exiting the Unit 1 torus and not performing a whole
body contamination survey before leaving this area.
The corrective action
taken, as described in your letter, apparently failed to insure that proper
contamination monitoring was performed.
In your response to the Notice of
Violation you should pay particular attention to those actions which would
provide additional assurance that workers will perform whole body contamination
surveys upon exiting areas requiring protective clothing.
8108040434 810727
PDR ADOCK 05000321
O
_
_
.
-__ _
.
_
. _ - .
.
.
. -
- .
_
__
-
- -
.
.- -
.
_-
-
_
.
JUN
4 1981
.
Georgia Power Company
2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this
letter and the enclosed report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If the report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclo-
sure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you:
(a) notify this office
by telephone within ten days from the date of this letter of your intention to
file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five days from the
date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such infor-
mation.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than
seven days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly
so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with section 2.790(b)(1),
such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of
the information which identifies the document or part thereof sought to be with-
held, and a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed
that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section
further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations
listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The information sought :o be withheld shall be
incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we
do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above,
the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss
l
them with you.
Sincerely,
\\ o.a bt
ames P. O'Reilly
irector
Enclosures.
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Vio
ion
'ss ,__
2.
Inspection Report Nos. 50-3 _ el 10
and 50-366/81-10
cc w/ encl;
W. A. Widner, Vice President and
General Manager-Nuclear Generation
M. Manry, Plant Manager
C. E. Belflower, Site QA Supervisor
e
f
,
,-~,r.,,
.,,m
- - . - - , . - - ,
, . - +
--.s.,,_
, _.- .
-._-y
-y,-,-
- , . - . - - , , , , - - - - , - - --
_
.-
-
. . -