ML20009D947

Forwards Response to NRC 810209 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-269/81-01,50-270/81-01 & 50-287/81-01. Corrective Actions:Addl Masonry Walls Surveyed.Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 Dtd 810202 Provides Necessary Info

ML20009D947
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	04/03/1981
From:	Parker W DUKE POWER CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20009D916	List: ML20009D928 ML20009D947
References
IEB-80-11, NUDOCS 8107240521
Download: ML20009D947 (2)

Text

__ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - . .

is ,

l DFFIClAI. COW DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza Dun.nixo 422 SocTu Cuuncu SrazzT CruutoTTz, N. C. 28242

,. dd WI LLI AM Q. PAR K ER, J R, Wet Passiormv Tette out:AmeA7C4 set.- paooucTie. April 3, 1981 37 3-4e8 3 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulato w Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:JJL 50-269/81-01 50-270/81-01 50-287/81-01

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Per conversation with Mr. Joe Lenahan of your office on March ici,1981, Duke Jower Company is resubmitting its response to the subject inspection report to specifi-cally address the five points requested by the NRC. This letter supercedes the letter sutaitted to your office on March 6, 1981 by Mr. A. C. Thies, Senior Vice President.

With regard to C. E. Murphy's letter dated February 9, 1981 which transmitt3d the subject inspection report, Duke Power considers that my letter concerning IE Bulletin 80-11 submitted to your office on February 2, 1981 provides the necessary response. However, please find attached a responne to the violation which speci-fically addresses the five po h ts requested by the NRC as well as a copy of my letter of February 2, 1981.

Duke Power Company does not consider the information contained therein to be proprietary.

I' declare under penalty of perjury that the statements set forth herein a u true

.and co rect to the at of my knowledge, executed on April-3, 1981.

Ver truly yours,

\)

i '

i hu.-- h.

illiam O. Parker, Jr.

G '

v JLJ:pw Attachment

-0107240521 810710 PDR ADOCK 05000269 0 PDR

DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Response to IE Inspection Report 50-269/81-01, -270/81-01, 287/81-01 Violation i

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Duke Pcwer Company Topical Report Section 17.1.5, requires in pa:t, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appro-pricte to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these inscructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, the procedures developed to implement IE Bulletin 80-11 requirements were not appropriate in that the procedures were not adequate to assure that all masonry walls in the vicinity of safety-related equipment would be identified and re-evaluated for their conformance to design requirements.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).

Response

A review of the events leading up to the initial surveillance revealed that nine areas in the plant were not surveyed because no masonry walls were found in an cffice search of drawings showing these areas. Subseque".t review of these draw-irgs showed the existence of five masonry walls which had not been surveyed.

An exhaustive search of the nine areas concerned was conducted by trained engineers during the period of January 13-16, 1981. No masonry walls other than the five which are shown on the as-built plant drawings were found. The five additional walls were surveyed in accordance with escablished procedures and will be in-cluded in the rev ew d of all masonry walls at Oconee Nuclear Station.

f

'- 1.' .** A . '

J s_ .- JL  !  ?.\ ,

i*

Duxt Powica COMPANY l'OW fret Ih1Il.DI NO 400 SolTH CHHHCH ST H F.r.T. C H A ul.o rT E. .N C. :302.W

..u..- o ..aaca.sa.

v.C P Patt'OCat ig , g e.. *. r '**. '

sic. =.co c'o- Fe'oruary 2, 1981 > --

Mr. James P~ O'Reilly, Director U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Ma riet ta Street, Sui.te 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: Ocence Nuclear Statiop-U. S. NRC IE 3ulletin'80-11 Dacket Nos. 50-269, -270, -287

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

This letter supplements my letters of July, October 29. and November 4, 19 A

which previously provided information in' response to IE Bulletin 30-11.

During a site visit to Ocnnee Nuc1 car Station by Mr. Joe Lenihan of JS:.F.C Atlanta office on 6-9 January 1981, it was determined that several masonr.

walls at the statien had not been surveyed ~in the conduct of initial as-bu i .' t surveillance required by the subject bulletin. Review :f the events leading up to the initial surveillance revealed that nine areas in the p ant were not surveyed because no masonry walls were found in an office search oE drawings showing these areas Subsequent review of these drawan.;9 shnwed the existence of five masonrf walls which had not been surveyed.

An exhaustive search of the nine areas concerned was conducted by trained engineers during the period 13-16 January 1981. No masonry walls other than the five which are show on-the as-built plant drawings were fcund.

The'additioaal valls are:

_Draving Wall Identification

• Priori:y**

0-1? T1-775.0-2526-HJ-1165 III T1-775.0-HJ-2526-1166  !!!

T1-775.0-2526-HJ-ll67 III T1-775.0-HJ-2526-1168 III 0-2018 A3-783.8-PQ-8889-1463  !

• Well identifi' cation in as defined in Duke's 60-day response to the belletin. (William O. Parker letter dated July 7, 1980).

• • The priority system is defined in Duke's 60-day response to the bulletin. (William 0. Parker letter dated July 7, 1980) ypr:7if2Sd$n?

fe

• . ,, 3 b

4 -"

Mr. James P. O'Reilly -

3 Page 2 February'2, 1981 The five additional valls vere surveyed in accordance with es:ablished pre-cedures and'will be included in the review of all masonry walls at Oconce

' Nuclear Station.

Very truly yours, c t W 7. .

j tlilliam O. Parker, Jr. ' /

7 ,/

'b RLC:pw cc: ~ Director Division of Reactor Operations

Office of.Inspcetion and' Enforcement U. 5. Nuclear Rc;;ulatory Commission tlashing

an, D. C. 20555 _

t

(

I' i

i i

h i.

? .

_- _ __. -- _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.