Text

Balance of Plant Equipment Dynamic Qualification Summary, for Water Pump Assemblies,Gauge & Instrument Panels,Rhr Cooling Tower,Valves,York Instrument Rack,Remote Shutdown Panel,Voltage Regulator,Battery Rack & Canister Assembly
	ML20009C144
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	07/14/1981
From:	; SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20009C140	List: ML20009C139; ML20009C144;
References
	6139-40, NUDOCS 8107200321
	Download: ML20009C144 (175)
	v • d • e

' *

,', , mm - --- -

m wn- w ama n n3

. l FERMI UNIT 2 4 Project #6139-40 [

Si9GEfiT&LUilDY li EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ,EMD File # f

.. .l }**g* gg- k OUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

! Page 1 of 6 ft'

,v l __

l s

FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 i

DETROIT EDISUN COMPANY l BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPiiENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

EQUIPMENT NAM'I: Chilled Water Pump Assemblies (Pump and bbtor on Frame)

EQUIPMENT NO. : T4100C040/74100C041 SPEC. NO.: DECO #3071-68 LOCATION: Auxiliary Building Elev. 677'6" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: @ ACTIVE PASSIVE During and After QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT

REFERENCES:

(1) Detroit Edison Spec. 3071-68 with Addendum "A" (2) Detroit Edison Drawing No. 6M721-4007 Rev. E Pdn. Details

([) (3) DECO File No. B9-649 Pump Motor Outline Drawing (4) DECO File No. B9-646 Pump Assembly Outline Drawing (5) DECO File No. B9-651 " Seismic Stress Analysis of Chilled Water Pumps"; Mcdonald Engineering Analysis Co. Report

ME-255 9-L-75.

1 l

i t

[emomerau _ - _ _- 1 Mtustrwmsmeasrsemesessemarwar.a.wass ar.nessmarweemanasswwaramuutemem-iremswowserswee:q Prepared by: h,i k Date: Vl9-V)

! Reviewed by: Date: j

! Approved by: Date: k I E 8107200321 810713 e PDR ADOCK 05000 m __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ -

%_ _____,, , a

l

} I FERMI UNIT 2 ! Project #6139-40 I ! $$80EEdT$sl.UE50Y k EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC h.EMDFile # i

.- , . nmw=m c s ic^oo QUALIFICATION SUMt1ARY l Page 2 of 6

[ ,,

V 3_ _

.c _!

QUALIFICATI0tl

SUMMARY

L0t.D COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:

OBE/SSE Seismic Loads ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:

A multidegree of freedom modal analysis was performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-II Type of elements used in analysis were beam.

, Seismic Loads were combined with normal operating seismic loads and stresses were compured with allowables.

(3.J .

REQUALIFICATION METHOD The new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in original qualification. The additional stresses due to new more conservative G values will be added to existing actual stresses and the results were compared with code allowables.

6 It l

l

-a

..m.. , . . _ -_, m _ , - , - , _ _ _ ce, , . . . - , . . , --

,J FERMI UNIT 2 l Project #6139-40 l SARGEDTSWNDY f EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC' EMD File # l l

Cm l!

'mWNCmMS e s ic ac.c

-1 QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

Page 3 of 6 l g

~ _ _ _

QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:

1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR

2. NSSS: General Electric BWR X

3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: CHILLED WATER PUMP ASSEMBLIES

1. Scope: NSSS @ BOP

2. Model Number: 3196 MI'/715 HP J750 RPM on 215Tm Quantity: 2

___e i

3. Vendor: Goulds Punps Inc./ Westinghouse Motor

4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.

of the devices included: N/A

5. Physical Description Appearance: Vertical output centri-

{; fugal pump horizontally nounted and attached to a motor via a coupling _

Dimensions: 3x4-8 Weiejht:225 lbs.

6. Location: Building: Auxiliary Building Elev. :puup uuy 677'6"

7. Field Mounting Conditions: -

@ Bolting: Number: 4 Size: 1/2" % A325 O weldin9: weld TYPE:

Leg: Length: Pitch:

0

8. Natural frequencies in each direction:

Per Pef. No. 5 page 8 the two Front to back,: > 33 Hz 1cwest frequenc2es are 39.37 and 77.37 Side to side *: > 33 Hz gdyy fory the entire pump / motor Vertical *: > 33 Hz

9. Method of determining natural frequencies:

Laboratory Test O Analysis O Other

10. a. System in which located: Control center air conditioning

, b. Functional description: Provide chilled water to cooling coil to maintain control center te:rparature

c. Equipment required for:

@ Hot Standby E] Cold Shutdown [f] Post LOCA 1

. *- +

I j FERMI U41T 2 l, Project #6139-40

. 2 .

I SARGEUTkLUNDY : EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC g EMD File #

'NNat'na c -c re o

_ $ QUAllFICAT10N

SUMMARY

l.Page 4 of 6

11. Pertinent reference design specifications:

DECO Spec 3071-68 III. IS EQUIPMENT AVliILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test

@ Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis

1. Qualification Report

a.

Title:

" Seismic Stress Analysis of Chilled Water Pumras"

b. Number and Date: bE-255 Sept. 5, 1975

2. Company that prepared report: Mcdonald Eng. Anal. Co.

l

3. Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.

"v . VIBRATION INPUT:

1. Loads considered: [@ Seismic only 0 nyorodynamic only O Seismic and Hydrodynamic O Other (Specif y) :

2. Pequired response spectra (attach the,g'raphs):

SL-3988 Fev. 00 4-18-72 B-13,14, 37, 38; C-9,19

3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:

G Absolute Sum i

SRSS

4. Demping Upset (OBE) : p Basis for damping:

Emerg. (SSE): 2% Reg. 1.61

5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required) :

! ZPA @ Other (Specify): Increased to account for Upset (OBE) : F/B= S/S=

futugg, change y_e 7,q 1,g Emerg . (SSE) : F/B= 3.O S/S= 3.0 V= 2.0 i 6. Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered?

O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:

IS No i , _ ,. _ , . . _ . , ,s,__., _ . . _ _ _

( * '

l 0

3 FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SAROECIMUUUY h EQUIPMEl4T DYNAMIC m

mammel. f OUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

}EMDFile#

C i

c -ic ^o o

(* ,_ . 22hmMNMt MYr. mar

)Page5of6

- _g;- ,

._e VI. IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: N/A i 1. Test Method: Single frequency:

i O Multiple frequency:

] 2. Input Motion: O Single axis O Multi axis 0 --

l 3. No. of qualification tests:

Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)

4. Frequency range:

5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?

l No Yes (attach TRS graphs)

\

4

6. Input g-level test:

Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:

Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:

l 7. Laboratory mounting:

4

{, O Bolting: Number: Size ,

Welding: Weld type:

Leg Length Pitch

8. Functional operability verified: O Yes No O Not applicable

9. Test results including modifications made: __.

10. Other tests performed:

VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:

! 1. Type of analysis ,

l Static analysis

@ Static coefficient analysis

O Dynamic analysis: O ner,onse spect rum O Time history -

2. Model type

Eigenvalues were extracted l 1-dimensiona] n> 33 IJz) therefore a static coefftcient analysis was O 2-dimensional sufficient. !

@ 3-dimensional i

nn--_m w__2am m .-._,,-mez m m,= m mn>mwa,N 9

Q 4 h FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 h j 8!BGEUThu UDY !!

EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC i

1:MD File #

icivm :smod i c -uc ^o o b I

1 4

OUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

! Page 6 of 6 1

w_ _

D,---w&_-enes:srrsmuumurwers exrma.1 1 .

a

3. Method of analysis:

@ Computer-aided calculation programs used: ICES-STRUDL-II C IIand calculations O

4. llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: } Yes No

5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements: see connents Element Calc Allow Stress Stress (See table attached)

6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural ele,?nts (active equipment only)

Element Calc Allow Stress Stress Impeller Clearance (Deflecti on)

Inches . 00376 .025 Flexible Coupling Misalignment, Radians . 00460 .017 l -

i VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Values extracted from OBE and SSE; OBE allowables were in l

general bounding.

l l

i r

_ _ . . _ _ _ _ .- e e

Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Pump Hold Down Bolts Stress (Shear) PSI 7,204 12,320 (Tensile) PSI 30,048 38,473 Anchor Bolt Stress (Shear) PSI 3,261 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 15,478 20,000 Shaft Stress, PSI 4,348 15,000 Support Frame, PSI 13,386 19,300 Thrust Retainer Bolt Stress, PSI 799 20,000 Pump Frame Bolt Stress (Shear) PSI 5,453 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 5,771 19,275 Frame Adapter Flange Stress, PSI 12,293 42,000 Adapter Flange Bolt Stress, PSI 12,230 21,870 Maximum Nozzle Stress (Suction) PSI 7,502 41,400 Discontinuity (Discharge) PSI 7,758 13,800 Discharge Flange Stress (Max. Disconti- 14,537 41,400 nuity)

Succion Flange Stress (Max. Discontinuity) 16,666 41,400 Pump Bearing Loals (Inboard) Lbs, 501 2,930 (Outboard) Lbs. 1,557 4,840 Motor IIold Down Bolts (Shear) PSI 4,617 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 8,522 20,000 Impellar Connector (Shear) PSI 2,045 7,500

('rensile) PSI 495 15,000

\

l l

CLIENT DETROIT EDISON r 3Ph PROJECT EURICO FERMI joa No WB C

.SAGpoEou*Tu@ l.[uuD1/ oEsimy saa one m u ,s. , e il2 N GIN CORN -

CHECKEo BY83 DATE 9 B/ 7f'- SHE ET OF

(.,_

= 4

. 1 i

E

'I :

m mm m

m e

n s 8 8

~

5 /

I i i

/A ~i

/i r/_ lii 1 l l t/ / / / il l ,

! ! fl// / ! !I 9l 0 o o I //// ! l .

El lE E E ii

' SN\ \

~

t a a 2

//au\/ ! i O = 0 a /

?

E 1

E M M

, , j

/ i i

~y ~

n ~.

. g ,

.)

3

j = i l l l '. . ' '

,,, . . i h' -

s ,

ig f s - - _

[

- i ,

, 4 -

, ,' i.

- i j' i !

. . i i . . i i I .w.- . A l

i l 1L, .l ' _,ti i , l l l l 1 l i '

1 l &

a

! Ii i ! u 1

\

B 6 .

~.ii, i ,, , ,1,1 i ,,i, i ,i ,,,, ,,,, , . , , ,,,,,,,,,,,2, ,,,

,h

& Q= :

~

: a a a - - - N Q R 6 ? G

. munsws*==

N . ..,,

FIGURE B-13 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION-684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5)

REACTOR AUXILIARY BisiLDING NORTH-SOUTH COM PONENT,.

-+e- _ n

Z Ct. LENT DETROIT EDISON {

d)bb)Yh {}]f PROJECT F2iPICO Fr'mtT DESIGN LY SGII DATE b-i l 19

_ JOB NO39T 407'

~

iUNGIND2RG -

CHECKED BYJIS DATE N18/71 StEET _ OF O .

s as,u

4 I.u . . E I: e a N 5 -

: : : 3 a c 1, , , e 0

,. ,4 l *

2 S_ ,

- / -

l ! l 7

t5 t7. t t1 l- // , _ ._ _

/

_h b b b --

. a -

N N m

N a .

n ~ _

r r, .

d :

E E R R 1

. m e w ,

n,

~

, 7 ",f y ___ _ .

^

N M_ct %

l E

. . . _ _ . - _. . c.

N N

~ -

s - I K hN I ! '

\ % l t ,~

l I

h

~

i f l

I

s. 8 m i 3

I . -

l, ; .

b 8

h-4 r

(t,,,

~,,,, , , , , , , ,liti , i,ir ,,,, in, ,,,, , , , , , , ,,,, ,,, ,,, .,1 d .. l g m = 4 4 s

,I s a .* Oa r.:vns wwmen, p

,A FIGURE B-!4 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPEt TRA i ,

4 OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAl(E 2LEVATION-634 -5" (SLAB NOf 5)'

REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT

l '

Ct. LENT DETROIT EDTSOM g f g' } Q W {} ] f PROJECT QICOFERMI JOB NO 3988-fS_

DES'GN BY SW, DATE AT'11 18 .1St72 iCNGIN50RO -

CHECKED BY HH5 DATE 4/18/ 72- SHEET ___ 0F U . >

f

2 E I: : - , ., ., .,

-$ m e m n -- e s 8 8 s.

.~ _

11

_} : _1:

e. :

l i .j l..

I

/// / / l ij .; L l

'._.i

. ' ., l l ! /// _1._. ;,,,..

Ii ! II i 1 ///1 ! . . ___; ; . : '

e -

! l! 99919 i ll /f I /// l ! !: !- '3

l l

l. =

'~

O T F= l

== l , /jf,/_/, l l F1 ;: i ' : -

7 2 / "i C RO 2 4 ~2 O lI -/A l ! sI I'- a.,. ..-

1RR h "? "E A '/ '

l

_ . _ _ ~

.i i \ c \ ' f' i .

i 1 ., ,

O :

b i i ,

k i

b l!

i N L *

' f, ~

. .t :

N. N , i i I.

i I .

i.

l:.

g :

l a ::

2 .

j , , ,

v3 i

j-- ;.

- d. -- - - : -

- , '; i '

- l ! l l l- t i i

- . . . . .. . .a l l I l i i -

i i '

ll .

1, 1 I !I I l _i 1l , ,

! I 1 R

I I l i. z i

s. .i .......n l

i l I f l ,

j! i

.t__a_..

t.

' ....._..a. ,

- i 1 3

- t j m

1

.u..

i- _. L . . . . . * ;; ..

1 -

l;'; i l

l

. I. 1 g A111 I I 't E i 1 1 ! ! 1ifI t if f Iff f1 I t t 1 1 9 r i; a . g r a1,r, t r !, , ! ,,

k d 2 ** 3 3 % 3 3 ** ** . *. "

N lr. 2 6 di 6

suuns ww nw lC HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA ricURE B-37 DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAME ELEVATION - 684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5) ,

. REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH- SOUTH COMPONENT

.MiGEDUm WuDY PROJECT __EGRICO FE.M4I DESIGN BY_ AEI DATE April 1B, jogyo,j34m_oc i9t2 I CN ~~lN GZ Wl -

CHECKED B'r_JH 5~ DATE - $/I % 71 SHE ET __. OF

'C .

E I:

9,.... ....

I

.................................'..os a O 3 -

t 9 3 a n p l

.i.

as,

..; w

. i' .- '

lI I !. i

/ ii;i4

// ..

I I // /V i __ d. j. i ' "

ce ao V//A ii Re sv

~

.w

///A/ _ -

l ,i..b.

. ..!. l' ..k .

~

f f f -

>A

'$A

// / , lI 'y ~

h

1.C M

' <f - - ,

' i . r r:-

// je !~

A '$'

/ [l/

e m /

n . . r- /j./ -

/ l ,: l1 ; e - .

i i

~

t /. j [ ! ! U '

/ / ' l 0 g i

(

i

- /

-- \

/

I /

g-I

l9 i

4 1

l;

_'3

'l

' - 1 M; e ;

r : l 49 ,,

-.f N -

1

[.: l N N- !

P% l 1 :

s s l !: ' ! I [c. p a '

I I -

NN

\A L,._, '

_ . . d ,

i _.

li

. 1 1. r

._4.

i s. ! - ;

l {

_ iI L !i i

l

. i

11 -

j i l

. ,.- _.4,. .-i.. ,a ,

l l i e i -

2 -

.! -4 l l l 1 i i i *

}. S..

~

4s l .j i .

i:

....i .

i i

q s.

i' i . , .

1 I

L . . . + .. . , . i . , . , _. ; a

.+;.':) -

R~

- d 5 .. . -1*. 1 ;;, .

< a

.i!j 4

. l l'!..

i F f f f EtIt ,t 1i i t it t R f I f f ff f l 1[] ) l l l l jgjg . ..

l l g y j t j j g t g;fg t i k h h : : : "-

9 9 *- U 9 $ $ 8 1 1 8 6 m,

nun s wwmew

, FIGURE B--38 i HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA C

t oesic" s^ sis e^RTHOUAl'.E ELEVATION - 684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5) l REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST- WEST COM PONENT

. . i b

o mu6

1 A

l C1. LENT DFTROIT EDISOM S&ea d-a *&gppiBV PROJECT E!RICO FERMI JOBtt0309A

- i -u -

DESIGN BY SGil DATE ADril 18- 107?

IGNOINCCRG -

CHECKED BY ES DATE Wl4 71 SHEET _ OF 1

p -

r

, ,i E E : : : : : : : 3 m mm m e m e a a 8 5 n.. . . . . . . .. . .1 1 . . . .1 . . . . . . . u. .... .. .. ... .. .

4a

- 1 :, 11 i,- -

l;;i* _-..

) -

?

l1,1 -

) e 3 -

. ._ _. j. . [_ . . ...

i ,

I I

_ .. . . i .; . . ,-

i L,i

! ! ! l l l

.__. . l

; . ; ! sI! -

6

-- H

'.'-lI..

g

,j ,

i

. .._.. l". <

i

.g f:7.._. g -

I , /ii :

- ' . p 1 . -

,a > .- , - . - .

'r = m n O -

7 7Mr

! 3 O m. e - -

1

(

.' .<<<@ j i*

e

~

W- '

l M' J, n' i

i l3:

~

v.mw, - ,

i - ?.

re:r m a i l l -

I. .

_...4

,..._.-4, . . .

I N

h. ' l

'l pI . n j

, ; . j . * .. .

1 l l

{ ' l i c -

.. .y-: 1 r-T:......,s 1'

! ; A iT i %i l

.._ li - '

! j i i .,

- !v : .

._4 . ..+ ,

! I i i ! I iI {l 1 .

. . e I.,

! !I

! i. l _

ia l : --

-t i .

.. -. . . . . . .,3 I !t l

p., . .

i _

.....a i i.. 1 -

' ! I 3 m -

.[' . ,.. . 4 ::

i , 4 8

- i i g

9' g au.tr'a.1 i i ii iniini ini r rei, in ii .i it r i!,,.ii. i:iir'i1 .i1 t. !..

E B B: : : : : 0 *

~m " m m n m ; q s a 6' m., a ww ..m FIGURE C-9

^

G VERTICAL Ri SPONSE SPECTRA d .

OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE AUXILIARY BUILDING SLAB EL. 643'-6" 5 677'-6" v i;4 .

w o

CLIENT DETROIT EDISO![ CO.

'r2IRICO FFFiT Jos No._3, gag . t; '.

PR JECT :

SG. t DATE A"ri l 9- *07?

DESIGN SY 4

([..SEiMUT&L8Jn"ml

-- iCNGINDCTIC - CHECKED BY HH3 DATE 4,IlO / 72,'5HE ET ___ OF _

?

' t, l :

4

. )

d

~t a -

*

8 8 8 g

,$ E I: : : : 's ....

S

=

9

t

..g,jg., ,, .~ _ , ,

,, 4 t.

,I g 8

I-~];'

I , (r i4 I:

- kil;*lI?ii l 'O c

, . .[. .

,p :

lt, .

-l

- - ' , ._ i ' ..p.... , ., ,. . , - -

i i: . . . .

l

I f i j W i l

iiI.!

.. . s.. 1-

- , l l,:,;i**4 ! **

. j i ---

c. j i 3

j ,,.

- t .1,.,-.... ..

,- j i ".

l I -.

7 QQQQ ?y .

1

u. l. .~ '

a ,'

g m~- , J O' THW x

'. _ s

. u g* r.= / <

. Qmem^

Q

$ /i > ._

t i i j j /. // .'. f p . l } i ,

s

.. . . :. . . . c

w '. VlRW'8" ;

y in t- -

.: . I t'

[;

t

( '

\Y\ / Is .

l L -

\. \' , -

./ , i l g( t p-J i

j

! l

- -j i

- i p -t \\- \ -..

...._, j a

t #X i i i ? I i ii .\ i

!I t t ',

i

?- - i :

I

i. . . . J; a

~ : i - . .... :

[ -

l t'-I ts k. mw i i I l l '

I -

_g

! 'NN NN I I !

5 !, . . . _

'l I I '

I !

I ju

] .

i ~ !i DN! I.. . l ; .

.$, s -

i j .

) ~ i l : .

I . .,

u. . _ .... _ r. , .

3 '

n

' ; 6

- ; i 4 l .

l f

. . . _ , ?,?

4 1 ii+ iit 1- - t g.

,iiie iiit r e r t 3 **ti ia t ' in i .iii i i tiit i it t i 1

- * "'- ** C 2 6 4 6 3%3 0 3 ** .

k 3 Q3 % %

sons ww,. inn h ,

g>

5

'I h

~

k . . . . _ . FIGURE C-19 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA N '!

DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE AUXILIARY BUILDING SLAD EL. 643'-6" 5 677'-6" k

g G u ,Q

_ = _ - - -

=- - - -

q FERMI UNIT 2 j Project #6139-40 $

S!!RGEUT&UJEmV EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC 5. EMD File # 3 c 'g*19717 f QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

fPage1of6 i L- __

H -

FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIHiENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

E Q U I P M E N T !.*A M E : 10"O Shan-Rod Valve Type Dampers with Bettis Actuators EQUIPMENT NO. :T4100F063A/063B SPEC. NO.:

LOCATION: Reactor Building T.O.D. Elevation 673'-3" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: {@ ACTIVE PASSIVE i *To fail open.

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT

REFERENCES:

1. Ralph M. Parsons Co., Drawing No. 6M721-2849, Rev. L.

s 2. Detroit Edison Con.pany File No. B9-781.

a

3. DECO Bill of Material No. 89-266M T4100-F-900-CA-005.

4. DECO File No. B9-ll19.

t

, u_ _ .

__..-_--m=--------__a-__-,=u==-.mm_.,_.m--W Prepared by: )A. u,k Date: 7 Cl Date:

e Reviewed by:

Approved by: Date: ;

l' a_- a s M

, y,grggggggy . - -, _ - - g_ _ m _ __, g m m 3g h . - - - -- -e p-w -

_7% 7

i

, ! I FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l I J SARGEUT6!.UDDV I.

EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC <.EMD File # h t

'5"9EdL"g- OllALIFICATIOEl

SUMMARY

Page 2 of 6 QUALIFICATI0tl

SUMMARY

i LOAD COMBINATIC!1S CONSIDERED:

OBE/SSE Scismic Loads ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:

Static Coefficient Method qualified to Sg Horz. (both) 3g Vert.

REQUALIFICATION METHOD _:

Show that the new seismic levels are below the levels c;.ginally used.

1 I

i

( -

l. '

1 : -

s f, FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 8A536EI.IiOl.UEjUV h EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #

' NWNamn QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

Page 3 of 6

('/

w c s ec roo o _

QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:

1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR

2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @

3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: 10"0 ISO. Valve / Dampers with Actuators

1. Scope: NSSS BOP

2. Model Number : Type 4340 (Dampers)/CB525-SF .(Act .) Quantity : 2

3. Vendor: Shan-Rod Inc. (DarSorn)/Bettin (Actunenrn)

4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.

of the Cnvices included: N/A

5. Physical Description Appearance: Isolation Damner

,) Mounted in a circular duct with actuator mounted in a cantilever zu/ fnnhinn nis. va lve Dimensions :15"0x6" (long)/5-3/4"0x 28"(ll)x20"(LMeight : 70 1hn- ric tuate

6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Elev.: 673'-3"

7. Field Mounting Conditions:

Q Bolting: Number: g Size: 5/8"0 0 woldin9: weld Trep:

Leg: Length: Pitch:

8. Natural frequencies in each direction:

Front to back: Not Calculated .

Side to side : Not Calculated Vertical: Not Calculated

9. Method of determining natural frequencies: N/A O Laboratory Test O Analysis O Other

10. a. System in which located: co m oi c'r nter_ Air __Cond (g b. Functional description: Normal Open-must close is event of k O C A._ip-permit _.prcmitizing onntrol center 4H1

c. Equi b nent required for: min. makeup air Hot Standby C c'o]d Shutdown O Post LOCA

_]

. _ __. . _- a - __ _ _ _ ____-_____ -___ - ________--_

1 FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40

{

l SARGENTM.UUDY j EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ' EMD File # j

0CINCOMO - 0 QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

i.Page 4 of 6 l j c .-oc ^o o i C = J

11. Portinent reference design specifications:

III. Is EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test

! @ Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis i

1. Quali fication Report "Scismic Analysis of Shan-Rod Inc. Type 4340 Heav',

a. Title : Duty Butterfiv Damners"

b. Number and Date : DECO File No. B9-1119, 8-19-77, Rev. 10-24-77

2. Company that prepared report : Shan-Rod Inc.

3. Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.

V. VIBRATION INPUT:

1. Loads considered: Q Seismic only C Hydrodynamic onty Seismic and Hydrodynamic C Other (Specify) :

2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):

SL-3988 Rev. 00, 4-18-72, B-11,12,13,14.35.36.37.38: c-5. 7 .15.17

3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:

2 Absolute Sum SRSS

4. Damping Upset (OBE) : 1% Basis for damping: Rec. Guide 1.f.il Emerg. (SSE): _2 %

5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required):

ZPA @ Other f.Specif y) : Per Ref. No. 3 Upset (OBE): F/B= 5g S/S= sc V= 3-Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= sn S/S= Sc V= h.

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Describe loads and how they were treated in overall O Yes qualification program:

b

@ No

7 -

' l FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40

) SARGE!JT&LURDY 4

! EQUIPMENT u/NAMIC EMD File #

1am2:Necm:r . i j

- c H ie roo QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

Page 5 of 6

. C _

VI. IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, TilEN COMPLETE: N/A

1. Test Method: Single frequency:

Multiple frequency:

2. Input Motion: [] Single axis

O Multi axis O

3. No. of qualification tests:

Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)

4. Frequency range

5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?

[] No [] Yes (attach TRS graphs)

6. Input g-le"el test:

Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:

Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:

7. Laboratory mounting:

IlBolting: Number: Size Welding: Weld type:

Leg Length .

Pitch 0

S. Functional operability verified: Yes [] No

[] Not applicable l 9. Test results including modifications made:

10. Other tests performed:

VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:

1. Type of analysis

[] Static analysis 50 Static coefficient analysis

[] Dynamic analysis: [] Response spectrum O Time history i

2. Model type:

l (j [] l-dimensional

[] 2-dimensiona l

@] 3-dimensional

_ _ _ _ __J

.~

. . __ _= - ..- - - - -

[. - . -

. _ _ _,asenemmemmememassesemiscrease- .anmune.m l _D b h

i 4 FERMI UNIT 2 .

Project #6139-40 's

. ' lj SARGEMT&!.UDDY '

EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC .nMD File #

inrem us m a. l j 1

e s .c ^c.c, QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

Page 6 of 6 k 4;-- --

-_ E _ _ _ -__ _ m(i

3. Method of analysis:

O computcr-aided calculation programs used:

@ IIand calculations :

O

4. IIave equipn.ent supports been adequately considered in analysis: @ Yes No

5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:

riement Calc Allow Stress Stress l

AnchorBoltsStressIntensity(PSI 5 15,530 85,000 Actuator Plate Weld Stress Intensity (PEI) 2,940 20,000 i Flange Bolts Stress Intensity (PSI) 4,219 85,000

6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)

Element Calc Allow Stress Stress Disc. Deflection (in) 0.000462 0.05 4

VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

None b/

, _ . . _ . - _ _ _ . - . _ _ - , _ _ . - - - - - _-_,,,_.m..., . , _ _ _ . . , . . - . _ . . , _ _ . . _ . - . _ _ _ , . _ ,. - , _ .

l ' CLIENT ETWXTTEl@28 PROJECT EliP ICO F.'-PI Joe No %PR .,

SAilGEjT&l.00DY DE51G4 BY oG" DATE Anr13 10. 197?

CPJ2tNuZpitt _1 CHECKED BY _hh3 DATE d'E ~; SHEET _ OF C,- .

?

r k 53 ,, .4 a

9 *

. *f C 2 8 8

(,. ,,4

, ; ,o i , .;. ,

, . . , , . 3 . "l ., , . . , . . . . . . .;..

i..g....l. -

. .l ~

,--+).. O

)

/.,

i

. . . ,. _ . t. .

., ~

I i j/./ ' .- . . . , _l .,

1

- i ;, ? i,. ,. .. I 7; ~ r ;;: l ; ,. '

15 l2 g O 15 ! lt. ;

J f. . .' I. .

7_.

- ' l& le & lh I i i / I 1 l!

< i< < R ii I : !*

1' g

O IQ Q !Q l'i e 1

-4....-.,.s' I

,. I s .m I l .

'3 N R 'eQ l l

1.. .-

m e a n ,

,~

. T 1

i ,

i. . l.T~~ ' i ,. ' [ **

i I .i l

- ' t.

_. G.4 .-

Q o + . .

ec

..~,.

, ...s :

ig p -

. . l i ;

j .. .a.....,..

N : I i . *

^

NI l.

1 I

i 4

i

' 1 . .; . . .. ;- . . . .. : . - . . . . . -

a -

t i i

i i .-

i .

t i _ .. ..

~ '

I I ! l

' \ ;

_ . .i . . . . .... .

4 l t l l l l l i \

l lI, .l l l l8 ,

,t _ .

'i a,

.j 3._....

, s 1 I i j

[ a

- i f

.-l .. . . .. u

;i l e i :

, :. _.1I +......,......;x -5

. 1 ! ' .1 .

l l l

l .. p.. . .. .;

9 l

} ,

l g

se "i> in ii i i ri i -

i In o 1 .1 .,i iiii nii, i i ii 1 + .1 ,1.., .ii.

I,,, -n i i . : 1 "

% 2 b .5 l=

fE - - -

5 $ 3a .e .,e 4 .* .s suun s ww.mv f3 FIGURE B-11 k' HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE ZLEVATION - 659'-0" (SLAB NO. 4)

REACTOR AUXILIARY DUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT i

(

9 zH em3JoHa L- d, go,-

EoMna maWHaO mtag,

'0 ZO , o D. U-'

gyOOl, l@ i t t- - _ ~C "1<

, C Ew y m<. %2 :

0pam Y a

a a . 2 0,j 62O2ag3a> s 9mQmo *g U3o .

0y4m - hc S y'3' pmm l O"

.~

e

'_'_ . a

..n n t m .

a e o .

4 u o

t u o t

. a. 3 t. n ,

s

o.

s 0

0 s t - -

3.: .

1 i

. t t

\

\ -

g gY A

\ - -

3 L

t

\N\ __- $

k\

l ,-

, G I

I G

J J

G I

I - I G

_ \ q\ -

e 1

o t

P l

l P

I

\ 6 A Al A A -

1 D D D D \\ :; .* 4 s

u

_A- -

1 2 5

\_ 3 _

3

. - - g .

%t .

6L .

l9

_ - - _. ._ - 2 o

s.

n

. r _. /i_ I - ,

t i

1

- , x.

c.

. ee m

. - t 1 .;j - ! ,-

'l.

P w . -

/, .

'm _ 4

~

_L. m.i ,, ~

- _- l

_ _. - _- h a

t

- 4 3

n-A, .

s J.

n.__: .

- ..- . _ _: _ b - _: - :~ - _ - _ _ _

.~~

' - : - - ~

?

s a ut

.o m t o

s uo u 0 1 u o t

'- .. > 4 3 1 n - " 3 -

e D. ,

- n' .g !,j

--) 9-{ h ai_w .

(q I0m ozdI'r0Ox mmmTOzmm m A0 OAm>;zc) c>m

mb1IOC>Xm - mrq'<>i5z .,cb- -

o r>a zO. 5 g>O;O%>C :i- <- gc rO_2O zOmq.,TmO d. O . Ozmzi-

CLIENT DiW GIT EDDLb 1:!!P.ICO Fi:ii41 ugs q r) a g((g gPgy n PROJECT DESIGN BY JUU DATE __urril 'i' - 1./C JOB NO.$'f n-M --

CNQiNGGR5 -

CHECKED BY__J4 H 5 DATE 4/l ? / TP- SHEET ___ OF

.g .

. ;a :i 's : - : = -

:- , , - , , = = s as.

...( ,~,~

l

. _ + -

. p' l t-

=.__

..L

-.....; .(. .t _-l

):

1I l l I l I

! 2_ i

._..L..! I*'

0 J ., 2--

l V #, l 1 LJ. l; .

/ / .!. I.

l 9 ;l Al l

-m _

-l l

_ .l _ . . _ _ .

. - .m , 7,. .

. 1 >

_L,~

/f ..f ._-

c4 a,, .. 7 i, 8

![__I -

s N .n 4s /

,/

s ll .

e * '

, e /,j. ; , / l f

l 1.u . --

s N,i \ .l l - ,,

cu

i. s y Ni j !

e c

_. .: ~ !

. S

l I.\, l. i

- i -....a.. .'...y.*.,.*

~

l s' A.

i

!. 1

. i N g I i l? -

g N

h

.L_.

l

. 1 4 _. ....J.'

! 8

! -j ii .

_' . _. 1 1 ..._ 3. ._ . .. -

- l ! !

l l 4

_ . . . . - . . . . ... ..A f\-l

.l ,I l: l !

- l l l :

. . . . = .. .

l l l ll l l i

. . ,i ._ ..i

- 3 . . . . . _ ._- . . - . 4 l

, I i i ,

' ' . l. ' -

m .

.3 l t l .

I 1

__. . L i

J- . . . . .. . ,.'x-

. I ! -

.1 i

) j , 4 .

n .. ._. s.. .. . . , . . -

, _t

, i i ; i

- ' I8

. , i .t.

o,. ,i,. , i i!,t , l ,,, i,,,- ,,,, ,,,, , , , , , , ,,,, ,.,1 ,,,,;.,, ,it,: , ' ..

,$ $ 3E

U % "

0 " - 9 " *

N 9 L: 8 d 0 c.ivris ww+nn g . HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA FIGURE D-35

,DCSIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-0" (SLAB NO. 4)

REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COM PONENT

~

4 CLIENT DETROIT EDIS0ll PROJECT M1CO FERIII jos no 398"-CO-SADGEDT& LUP"DY DESIGN BY- SWI DATE ATil

,8-

' 1972 1 2:NGINGLRcL CHECKED BY _HH S DATC _4/18/ 71 SHEET _ 0F U >

E.

,u..

E E: : - : : : : : -!

2 m , e n e

e a as. .~ -

j'

,. , . .< , 11 , , . . . . , . . . . 1 3

' 1

._! , ys l

i , , j i t i /

// L.

i l '] .!' j! . ' . .._

//f..i_..

t : i i l 4 , . . ..

.I i I. . i. I I I /// ._.i ... '

!Ii 99919 .~

l /

I /// l ! .. . .!_.! . .i .!

3 3

I l

!f h p N I ._I_ . . . _ . .-

= ca c h l I i'- .

f,

, a , .a . , . . . -

me.a e cw a

, / l'is,i n . - -'S.

w._. l u .

O i

I M i i i\ ! x i'l j

3-

.~

il I- \ X K,:N I

! .~. Y :'

1 I i_ . . . . ,

. _I.: M ,i I. i. :: /

\ '

l I li . 'j g h,

a

._. a . - .. . : -

' - ! i i >

l 1 ! l l ! l

-f i i i i

.s 1 iI ! l ll i i i 1 I II i 1 l -

L' .-.. '

._'..--...._.'s a -- . - , ....__a l l. i i

. ,. s . . . . . . ._. a.

) 3. .

~ .

m

.u...

1_ '......."*z ..

'; i

- l

. i :

,o,, , , , , , , !,,,, ,,,i in, i,,, , , ., , , ,1, .

,,,,.,,,.l.,, et, < ! ..

g g g

3+ w . u a a - - - - - - -

m b & b suun a ww.mv FIGURE B-37 HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA *

, DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5) .

REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT

h CLIENT DETROIT EDISOM Of *%80WCIl~I 08'\r3 % PROJECT EMRICO FERI11 JOB NO- % 83 ad b'. I* {l Mg'pT 8* d DESIGN BY SGM DATE Anri1 18 1972 IGNCINUDRO - CHECKED BY DATE 4 ' W/ T1 SHE ET ___ OF

.HHS

., a E == = . - ., _, ., , ,e ~

= = = =s. _

..j.64

_i. ... . . . . . .. . ............n.. .... . .

,'i '.' .

?

.! ! !1 -

- I g.-y

! i i 3

+

-r- , ,

s I !i i i i ;.... .

j;ee t

I :

lo aa la

.=

i ,

r.i , - - -

i -

- - i- . ,

laa a i

. i a s i -

.. . i.a.

5 !! Is a aN is L ..w M// .I.___ _i_! ._ . ..[. . : .

~ u' A

ly\ .

. l. *J

\

~

t' .\ .. G _s, g O :

L'/ j

i

- i S

I.

i ,

i. i ,- -

. _..~ g

\j\ ( M E

~ '

E E l i.5 'I i .

. ?, ;-

( -._ ; . _ . .

- - _ _ _ _ .. . . . . . . . . . : = :-

, i

.i l . .

-i

- : .; i ,

' !t .dO .. t . .

l l .

I I I

! l ! I II L. . ; 2 . . _. .

l -

l l lll t i i t .

I i-. . . , . . . . ,s 1ll i ! i ' i -

l l l :

~

l .

! I ' ! I I f , l }_ ...y is l l l l l l l 1

t e

_ s..

4. s

.; i i .

l

. ,. .... .. 1e l -

4 l, a -

l g l c

~

' , t p _ .[ . .", -

}l.i e i

- 1 li i

i .

1 i . .

'Il .

I g iiii in ii 1 1 i i iiri 1 1 - r 1r: 1 ri ir i i i e i ,

riniiin , Iir 1 1 i .i_ i.<

E g g : : : : : : m 9 m 3 -- ~ c. 2 a 4 &

senswn.,nn .

fs FIGURE D-12 U ~

HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA

' OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-0" (SLAD NO. 4) REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT A

CLIENT DETROIT EDISON PROJECT ENREO FFD?1T JOBHO.}g88 SARGEDT& L"*"jDY DESIGN DY SGEI DATE Ap-4 ' 14, 19.72 DATE 4/18 '72 SHE ET ,_ OF

'CNGINDQRG -

CHECKED BY J.)iS l- ,

O .

3 E I: : ; . . . . t = a a a 8,

- - .... .... . .. .... , , . a t ,, _i... . . . , , , , , , ,,, ,,, ,,,,,,,,,

.g.3 : -

l .

~

) _._. :;

3 I , - _ _ _..

~

tb t3 e a '

4 S

A NI A 2 L; - c3 s -

z L n

$~

Q Q~ . .

5 d

wr

!lE E

e m, R

n,

. 1 ~

, 7 / .

~

/ /

g M -. l N N,Wl I y.

e. . r-

' . . . _ .- . c. i E

N N N h 1 , 1 s. NN

) -

! ! \ h\

j i ! \ ! 1 I ,,

! I j l' l l I i i 1 3 ,

P h .a

! 'I a 3

~

L, ; .

g a _\

,,,,n , ,,,, ,,,, e,, ..,, .

,,,,,,,,,,,,!,i, , ,,,, ,,-, ,,,, , , , ,

= a 7

g g : 3 : a a a . . - - - -

s. 4 s n

wons w e,.,nn s

^

,. FIGURE B-14 a (,

m HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA

. OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION-684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5)

REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT 1

CLIENT. DETh0IT EDISOf!

PROJECT HQ:0 'IE D JOBNO-f; L - >

SARGEDT& WDD'I DESIGN CY d" DATE rd"il 1, . 1972 20Nutritcan~ -

OlECKED BYJHS DATE 4 / ' ' / 72. SHE ET ___ OF t%

V .

g

. j.

~ = s a c .,

. 4 E

....E . . . .

E:,, , ,

s

, , . . ,,,,,....,,,,=..,,;.,,,,

~ i ,i 3 ~

~ . .... O

'.l i .

I

- l'

/_ .}',.t ..

l f. .

e ..

i '

i .... ;._1 i l l # ...i .. ' . . ,. . ..i.-

l'

.w*.I..,8{

I l l t ! k_. :

VA# ; .. u] ] !. ::

! I r - - , l lii i .q 9 l -i n ,

^g^( #^ i l liii

{ .o 4 ,,g 3-f i g

--r-' +- h . *

i .

M :: 5 5 - -/ - l l , j l _.,i * .a . . . .

I .l h 1

M N

A

^ 4 M

k/l A}jh//

1 p;..'_.'ji. .

I !

/, d l l i

i'.I

, ij-

., .~

, y i . * .

((

g vb s i- -! *

- w I'

~

N- ,_

_ ._k I i . ... [ 5 .. L . l r. 4

', , f..5 a ~. N s g i E

I

- l ' '

B *

.=

~

, , , 3

' 'Q

- - - - .+..._

j - r..: ,

! ! { l 1- l -

. . -. . ..s .' . . .. s. . .e

?

~

l ! I l i i } i ! -

l I ; .

~

l I I l j . { ---

l A

l i -

3

._ 1 }. - . . . . :. . . > . ~

l' ' ;

, i ll f i

i~

l

, j - 2 - f- F -t'*

4 i 1 l

1 I a

- ll _jw. .e 1

i

p. .

I s : !,

I l, !!! . : l.. . ,

i, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, , ,, ,,,,,,,,,,, .,a,;... "

,,, ,,,, , , ,u, , , , , , , 1

,2 g:

i

: : m t e s - ~ r. q.a 4 ..

B : : :

? - nuna w iem a .

FIGURE B-36 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA PQ LJ DESIGN BASIS EAP.THOUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-C" (SLAB NO 4)

REACTOR AUXILIAR'l BUILDING EAST - WEST COMPONENT p .

w

g

CLIENT DETROIT EDIS0i! '

hbbE()b DESIG, BY I DATE April 1t, 1 /

CNEINUDR2 -

OtECKED BY 4H5 DATE 4/r e 72, SHEET _ OF JO aa a:. . . ..

=

.. m....

, ,, , , < e - . . .

....i.

. 3 5 .

4 J: .

.- ij i i

> - g : i

/ .a_. i l

i aw

, sV/-i,!j{1- l e o e,<,

////

b q .l :

et M s# a .W #A/ _..l j !.. i...i. J . !.

f f f '

=s .:

5:5

,. ,N / ,/ I! . i i

, l. r . .1. ,

i

. 3 11 '

r m a .-'b1

'8. / // 1 7.

a

~

z

/>/ .j / l lj 't I a g

I ',,

, / i I 0 -

(-

- a . I i. .t.

l n. .$~

1" r

.f

'% f I

N \\

l I I

. . . . j.. [.L.!

l.O l

~

..$ l

\ i8 a D d-i ! -.

. ld !

--- - i

-. LL .- . . ! -

ll l i !

l L

_L_ i i i i

i

_ u 1_

l i

. , _ . . . . .,a

~

l i-l l J

I !. i 1 l... 4..._...._.__.-.;4 R

li g

N%\i i

-4 i i e

i: i i b

l l I ; 'i

{ . -l t.. . g . 1 y. .+

l , . i i

l

,i 3

~ .! .

)

! r

._.__.5 .. .

I . : . . 1a 7. .

iIi 4 g

11ie f i t I f t !I

, l l

!. .'. .t t t f 111 ? ! I ? t tttt tt t t t i 1 1 & t 1_ tt af f f ififf; f f n 1 $t iij, j i 2 3: : : : : : : : 9 9 9 *- ' , ; 9 s 4 & '

savn s 'Wemeny FIGURE B-38 ~

i HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA '

' h. DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5) l

' REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST- WEST COM PONENT i

l e '

5 DETROIT EDISON

{'7 CLIENT

' PROJECT EURIC0 FEH1:I JOB NC 3988 9A* Er]T&Ud v ' JBY DESIGN BY 9 .L DATE Anril 18. 1972 l- 2 CNDINr:crtG -

CHECKED BY_1M-) DATE 4/ M > 7!- SHEET OF l .

j .

n.I.,,,,

E I: , . , ,

3 mn m

9 e

e s 8 8

.,~ ,

I I : '

, il i

t ll-

~

. l

, l t .,l a JJ -

! _ a 1l; .; :, i.

j 1

- I l l

.. . I4Ii ! 4 .i.

ll-

,,j.

g _....._.._.a 4.-

/ .'

. , .t ..

:9 9. 9,_ 9_

' //,IlI .

" mm .

. > -a a 7) ,

a 6 % SS 7 ! J O- -

Q E aa

~

** /' /j' . .; O 1 r : I m

a M Yd l ' l' i ' ' -' ' #

u r- N' tn j .3 v 1

t I

s I i d, . 4 i .. . _4 ..

_ .- , 5 .

i ,

- l g .

l l ..

g.;

t

' l m

pp_ j . ,

. . _1.

._.._ ._. .; 2 . . . . -

4 k i ?

! i ! ' .. _ . i ; . . . .

6}i a l .

I i i .

! i.,, i l ,a I

l ll} l i ! I i i .

- ~ '

i 7,

. , li 1 l ;ll l I .! ._

) s l

.l-ll

- ll l -

i l 1

).. . - - .-__ _ w s p

t NQ- ' \ -l; ., j j I

__ + ....

. .i

...a

]'

- I s I . ..

R %.. -

i I r

1.. I, . . . . .; z i

l 1 -

f f 1i i iI I f iff1 if i f f f?91 n t t

i. ffI1 ir

?1 ?I1 1%

g$

f f f f f .t

$ $E 3E S 3 0 0 $ '*

9 *- ~

N 9 9 8 3 L" mas ww+ m .

Q %

FIGURE C-7 s .

VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA k$ OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTCR BUILDING SLAB EL. 64 l'-6". 659'-6" $ 684'-G'"

.k*. ~ , . 4.

O E

O O .. O

-m M..,

)

e .

M C'.~

88 38 le is M to to S.

r ,,

me . .... 1.. , , , , . . ,..r.... . -

G3 F O R E QIII P M E N T'. LOCATED WITHIN A F

[b ue; - ... .-DISTANCE = 2t FROM THE WALL WHERE t" t IS THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB.

ias .' -- ... - - - _ . . . . _ _ ,,,, .-W t1 t.

. F ao . - - . .. .._... ._ . . . _ . . _ . _ __. .._ .._ . _ .. . _ ..

u N C'2 Q

g g m as .- . ._ .. _ . _ _ _. _ _ _ .. . _ _ . . ._: u I Qs y u ---- . - . . - -. .- .. .. . . . . - . . . - - _ . _. _ .... ... I to w .,

i 0

qg o , - - - .. . .. ._. . . . . . . ._ . . _ . ,. _ _ . _. . . _ . . __._ . . . . - u r

>O<

r - - - k;.. ItAMi*l ut; rmm " :-- ' - -

a m$$g l , , . . -1 '.'i. I mrli 11;t; -

9 R ;!j p

.I g , ,. ), . ,,Agg.II t* - -

m s' g m m

$ m (,"

to . . -

.f l'A! al

l N(;

u. pgnn -4

'- / '!.. I gg3 o -. . .

/'} ,/, . . . . . . ., _ . . . _ .._

. . - _.} u 7 m $ -i ,

_g m O

m. 2 mc W- '

/ -

$! p;. E.1 ogm a u _ _ _; u b;i.my g j/ tg 3; c z ..

am o, -,

o .-)

9Em

)

o e .

m.ym gg

,g' :]

, . / } . . . . . . . . .._ ___ . . . .... .. . . . _ _

g,, m] g .5 . .l g .. _ . . . . . . . ..

.3 gqq oO l 4 g

I l l' . . . . . - . . . . - .a Oo yp .'.

u. o n l 3 : -e n ia> , i

, ,.. .,. , . . _. ..__ ., mm

[D l' ;

'h d

{h G ?

l i

{

'f' r

a i '

\.

. . . . . . _ . .: tv d i

! , l i .

., e i

p*

i 3 is .

/ ;e l

.l l }. . --

is

, . i . .

s -8 m e

. .... : i [.

I 1 ...,..... mg j

_ i.

. , ... . . . , . . . .. . m.

,i

; , , , s . . .. . .. ..

I w

\ c, ,

i u . . .

3,

_ ... . . . . ... . . . . . . ...... . ......... .. .............tu.., ,

. . , , , ,. . . . . . , u o u .

.. s.

~

s V

--.--y--

O O -

Q '

i

\,

Co ru m .<n , y ,

30 21 a 30 5.e U to to *g CD ne g.

....r.:FOR EQUIPMENT:.. LOCATED WITHIN A .

me

-2

. no - . . . . ... .._. _ . ._._ _ . ._.___,__...

n'

_. DISTANCE = 2t FROM THE WALL WHERE j t IS THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB. gg i.e

..j... . _._

_ its 2.

9C

> aa

~

G 7,

g .. . _ . . . _ . . _ _ .._ __~ . . . . ._ .. _. _ .

nQ pc te; _ . . . _ ... _

3, 3 -q m -

<m u to

_} _ -

to r

f *) to __- -21_ DAMP.II C 1.

O$m % : -' - 2% DAi1P RG :

O md : *[

5% DAMPRG . .

9oon mC$C

- k =..-,.

$ Gi -

Le n G '~

>mr$ :

} ; # ,.' 10% DAMl'.LI G ; i *5 n$ -1 g 3 (S

} -J..

j

~

ts O w $ -d e,

{>a m o . . - : < m, r y.

mHg C 3 - .

.F Oo Igm to f*.

. M W H l C H M

_ ( ~ Le' Q O OC2n _

I- \ , l 55 O; 3>g g y .s ,

] .3 .g 1-Xmm 1 1 m o m@ ..

./.. ., _ _ . . _ .. ..

~

,e e .

=

h j .5 !.. . _ f . _. . _

.3

- l __

0 o s- >o n ,s i_-__

o

-I q 4 .. ..

s 8

.. >0 H y>

~

I Oy ~

-...: . I i ' . : mm O g) 3 3 9, . .;

. ._ __g-

.s .. .- 1 nd .C Go , - , . s, d 2 I . .

-M,s.

M O y _- - _ _ . . ,.. _g t = g W m -

s _ ._ -

s. ,_,

t l ; .

s ! 6 u

l

,ig

~

. . . . . .4 t . .. j s . . . _ _ _ _ ..._....g .[ . _. _ _f ...lp } 33 gf) \J1

,e ss

m t e . ~

l 3 . , , N.O , i e ?

m r "O

.ic .

.. . . .t . . ; .. 1 . . . . _ _ _ . . . __ .. _ r s =., . _ ; _ . . . _ . _

. L_ _.. i, m $m

. . . ..;.I,.... ,, . .: _ _ ... ._ .. ._ 4

_..._i.....__...~..,...-_=__-

o,

& . . .. .. 1 :. .. . , . . . . . . . . . . _ . .. ,,

on

2. . .........u....1... :... k._ u .. ....ii. . t.t!ii J .. L __m._u Lt .. Li.u c. ,,

2 . = = . .i # ., , . . .. .. t, is z. .

Pe+'.T, Se..

I I

~

^ g

- Ct. LENT _ _ DETROIT EDIS0il CO.

E!RICO F M I JOB t40 0 PROJECT y L).!mD5 N, e ,f saa os,en ,11 s. ,c7, i S/A" QLR]T&e .

ossics ,y

{

h- 1!:tNGINCDA83 -

~~

OiECKED BY_.)_ dis DATE Ti 0/71 SHE ET __._ OF O {

t . 1

- e *t c 2 8 8 8

,I E E: : : , ., 9 9 .

a:. . e l

,n i ,

.. . , , , , >> ,, . .. .... > > > . . . u.. .. i p;+g !l l2

,*;.i [^

t- .

i _..

g-m- *:

j -4 'h j- .

i

!a 1

. i

- ' ~ : .

., ' l -.

f l . . . . . ,.. ,

r h, :

.4

. , l t ._ . . . .I . _ g i ,

- a. ) .

! ! ! _ 4.. . .

f.

ll 'l l l .. . ...:

l' .a ,

I

[

=

. l l '

g

. i I U

8

. : .] O 0 0.0 4. ,

/

! j N N NjN li.

'O $h$i$

, 1

-v d /.

<m n!<l< ._.~ .

, m- ! _ ;

h. ',. . m('d "is ..k, l uv-

. s. . ..

/ .

/-);l l t . l! '

,l .

J l lt ;

\. 'i k.

. !i

\-

">> >>> !>"i nii i>>r inn ti i i > ii- .in 1 ,

i< 1- 1- .

a it i A'

i i 1

T i e a

3 i 3 g

'
s s s . .. . . - 4
. nons we.e em T FIGURE C .
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA t.% % M b' . $ f DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL. 641'- 6, 659'- 6" 5 684'-6" 9
's s' Q . M ,
'A % Q fw
- -- _ __ _ r - g,
! FERMI UNIT 2 : Project #6139-40 )
p- 3 i
!EP/DFile
SAliGEUT&LUUDY g EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC #
'EM$dfi"c*- QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
lPage 1 of 6
- -r ,
FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
- BALANCE OF PLANT
. EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Diesel Generator Gauge and Instrument Pancl EQUIPMENT NO. : SPEC. NO.: 3071-19 LOCATION: RHR Complex, El. 590' EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: @ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1. EMD File #013860 Containing Seismic Test report from Uyle Laboratories, report #43961, DECO File #TI-3175.
2. EMD File #001659 Containing Seismic Analysis of Support Structure for Engine Instrument Panel.
l Prepared by: Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
Approved by: Date:
i x .
(Project FERMI UNIT 2 #6139-40 I
! ONEOU((IblUUUY h s
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC (EMDFile # q QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6
'g7fuggga;j == -
QUAL.IFICAII0t1
SUMMARY
/ ,
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Normal + Operating Basis Earthquake Normal + Design Basis Earthquake ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METH0Q:
Instruments and gages are mounted on this panel. Active instru-ments, namely Synchro-Start Electric Switch Model ESSB-3AT, Dresser Industries Ashcraft Pneumatic Temperature Transmitter Model C-5680, Moore Products Co. Pneumatic Tempere.ture Transndtter Model 33, and Nullmatic Pneumatic Controller Madel 55 were premounted in a fabricated test fixture and were subjected to biaxial random motion test in the f rea.nency range of 1-40 .- 5 OBE's and 1 - SSE cach of 30 sec. is duration. Test was conducted in the two principal planes. Panel mounted on a support structure through vibration isolators. Support structure was analyzed by considering the panel and vibration isolators as a system of springs and mass. Frequen-cies were obtained by computer program A033. The panel was found Due to seismic and impact to bottom out due to the seismic loads.
loads, stresses in the support structure were obtained.
t e
l -
I FERMI UNIT ? !
Project #r139-40 EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC L EMD File # ,
l i SAGGENT&LU:!DY h
'm:WCmo d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 c sec r o o QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPF;:
. 1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR []
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR X
3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: Diesel Generator Gage and Instrument Panel
1. Scope: [] NSSS [X] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity: 1
3. Vendor: Colt Industries
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: attached
5. Physical Description Appearance: Panel made up of sheet metal and angles L
Dimensions: 28" x 8" x 62" Weight: 320 lbs.
6. Location: Building: RHR Complex Elev.: 590' or diesel generater skid
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
[] Bolting : Number: Size:
Welding: Weld Tyep:
Leg: Length: Pitch:
Vibration Isolators ..
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back: 6.4 o 9.3 Hz Side to side : 6.6 o 9.1 Hz Vertical: 3.45 Hz
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
[] Laboratory Test 6dAnalysis Other
10. a. System in which located: P.H.R.
b. Functional description: operation of Diesel Generator
c. Equipment required for:
. Hot Standby Cold Shutdown [] Post LOCA
I ,
i FERMI Ut41T 2. Project #6139-40 EQUIPMEt1T DYilAMIC EMD File #
SARGENT&LUNDY l '
" " "*- QUALIFICATI0t1
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C *d6C A G O l h - -
{ _
11. Pertinent reference design specifications: 3071-19 III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes O No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test
O Analysis
] Combination and Analysis of Test
1. Qualification Report
a.
Title:
Seismic Simulation Test Reriort
b. Number and Date: 43961-1, 5-1-78
2. Company that prepared report: Wvle Iaboratories & Cbit Industries
3. Company that reviewed report: Sargent & Lundy V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads considered: @ Seismic only O nyarodynamic only O Seismic and nyarodynamic 0 Other (Specify) :
O
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
Attached
3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra: N/A O Absolute Sum O SRSS (OBE) : 2% Basis for damping: Nureg 101
4. Damping Upset Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required): N/A O zPA O Other (Specify) :
S/S= V=
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S= V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
Describe loads and how they were treated in overall O Yes qualification program:
0 No j
m
l
(
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 -}.
O EMD File #
Lr lU EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC c NI:25:5 )
I "c ^c o l QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 a o y...; e. v.
VI. IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
j 1. Test Method: Single frequency:
E] Multiple frequency:
2. Input Motion: [] Single axis Multi axis I.
O
3. No. of qualification tests: ,
Upset (OBE) 5 Emerg. (SSE) I l,_ 4. Frequency range: 1 to 40 Hz
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[]No 50Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test: N/A Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting: Number: 10 Size 3/8" Gr 5 0 weldin9: weid type:
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: X Yes No O Not applicabic
9. Test results including modifications made: Passed
10. Other tests performed: None VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis
[] Static aaalysis Static coefficient analysis Dyna.nic analysis: [3 Response spectrum
[] Time history
2. Model type:
[] l-dimensional
[] 2-dimensional "
633-dimensional
. . . 4. _ ._
t .
g:
i FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 ~.
! SARGENT&LU:]DY i
awa:NQ2RS.
}i EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
e-.c co i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 i
3. Method of analysis: for Support
]
Computer-aided calculation i programs used: A033 l
[3 Hand calculations
4. Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: [@Yes No
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Support Tubing 19941 psi 28800 psi Weld on Tubing 1772 lb/in 2816 lb/in Vibration Isolator 294 lb 380 lb
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Deflections are not critical.
Calc Allow Element Stress Strecs i
l l
VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l \ i I
t f List of Devices on Diesel Generator Instrument Panel
a. Manometer Passive
b. Pyrometer Passive
c. Temperature Gage Passive l_
d. Temperature Gate Passive ;
e. Pressure Gage Passive i r
! f. Pressure Gage Passive .
g. Pressure Gage Passive i
Passive i
{ h. Pressure Gage I i. Pressure Gage Passive i
~
j. Tachometer Indicator Passive
k. Pressure Switch (3) Passive
1. Pnewmatic Transmitter Active
! m. Pnewmatic Controller Active
. n. Slenood Valve Passive
o. Speed Switch Active I
i l
l
~
i I
s . -
. Pcg] N3. 48' i
((
D u .,4 ! (.y r ,. d b b k.e ( : U. r ( R M m . 4 461-1
. r .a e- ,
e. f*, %
g I N*! \. A % d t !. .
Q.~ IUI.L SCALE SHOCK SPhCTRUM b Peak)- ,
. 1.0 ' 10 " 100Q 1CCO j s
%I
-( .
DAMPING C5d
. m....,._._____. . . . . . . _ _ . _ . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . . _ . _ _ . . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . . . . _ . . . .
f ~......._......__..: . . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . . . _ , . _ . . . . . _ . . _ _ _ . . . . . _ . . . . _ . . _ . . . . . . . .._.
. ....._j_ _ _v ;._.._.. . . _ .. . _ . . , _
4, . . _ , - _ , _ . - . - _. . . . - - _ - , .
..__,s___y.__3._,_._,...,._ . , , -_ ,- h ..___y.._.._.._...
} ~
r !
i
? . .U$.~ .~#-I!~55M-Wr~:Mrit:5:~~- -IT-~r: ;IE . _.-: _:M_-W.D:r.-@i :*-W:_-E;T -i Erf :M_* ~.A s
. ... . .._ . L_ ;_ _ _ . _ .- _
......_..__...__.1..-_._..._._._..__._.._.._._.__ - . .
_ .. ~ ,._...
, : .- :_ . : :u - - .== _. : - - - - ~== = v u = - _u=_ . : : = : .== . . = . . : : . _. : . . r
-.n : := u.. =: : : : .-- = :- w -- =:r: = ::=.: = : : - :n ---:---- : = : _ -: - .-: .- r 2 -- - - --M: -
.s . :- - . - .=._.=_.3.___.'
=-
. { .:.. u._ _
. . . _a._._3_._... . _. ... .- . . _ . ,
. _ . . _ _ _ .. .. _. _ . .. . ...__.__. ._. . -. =.__.__.___.____._._....._._..__..___.._r.-].
q__.._.__.;
,...r._..- ,.
=- .. _.. .. _ _ . 6. , _ ;
. ... ,_.4 :----,.. ,. ..._s. :_..-__.--= _.4__._._.,-...p.< - . . . - .
8
_ . - . _ . . 3_._
_. . .g _. . . . _ . ; _.......,_..
p
-...l_..
. ._ _a. gr r _
__ .g .._ ..
. ..P t 1 f .*- t.'. -t '-*
-t - 1 -
6._m _ w_ _ _ .. __ k, . . . .t._^_y1
. F- j ,- -.}
.-4.t 7
, ; - - t- L-y-4-!
~
6-.-- --- J-- + -H 7 j,
...___.4 .s -_ _ _ _ . _ _ . . .. _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . _ . . . . . . . . . ,t
).
. . _ _ ..,_,,.._.._. _ . _ . . _..__v.___...,_..._._...._......._.-_._.__.. ...~.s
. . . . - , _,r_. _ ;__ . - . .. . _ _..- _4. .i. i, j . . . .___. p ; .. a -y s_ ;
- ___ o .. ......_....;
.:.......___.l_=
- u. =:. -__ _._:;
.. . . . . n. :_. .:_.::: =. . .=. . _ . 2. .=. :_ _ _- _u. .=_ .: :. ._::. c_r_:: .... . .:.__N. ._ .. .:.u
._ =.. ..:=. .r..__:: . = _. =.. .u. . 7 s.,c.. w.
. . . _ . r. .: ; .t. ; .. .
r.- .t.. . ....... _.. ._--_
s
. . . . ..-._.__....--__...~.:7___.___..
. . . . . ..1 . .
e= -
g
! __. ._._a__
._.._-.._._.._._.__: ..._.._..t.__....m,
( :.v:_;= :_=..: : :::-~ _ ;_2 - _ .- . :-~~- : -- : . -- .u= : r -.._._. : :3 fi =c.: u._ . . . =.. t = - - . _ ru . __ u am'
[ := = . _ . . _. - - = : _. . =. -- . . . _ ._ : : - . :: : .== : .< := 1 : n. .:.;. _;._: :=.: _ :_;. = _=::- . =_. _ - - -r.
s!c / .
v, . . ._. . . . . _ _ . . _ - -_ . . _ _ _ _ - __ _._..
t . __ ; _- ._ _, .. ....___...
_..__..._..-..._..))
, . . . . _ _ _:1__ ____
., a _..__ _ _ . - .. .
.. =
..... _ .t i_._._4... _A .3,
/._..=... ,._ , ; ; i, j q_ .. . : a.; r .a _. _ l_. ._, .. . _y . } . S. l i ll - % _. - _ _ ; _ _.p
.y.7._. _ p., _. . .v . . ., . 4 j
]
.4... , .._ _{ l ; , i j._4 ! - _ i ._; .
. . ___ _ _._ _ . . . ._.._..,__..e J g .. .
._=_.-. _._ _ . _ _ _ _ .
, . _ . ....._..._.-..n. i
? [ _i
._. . _ _ - . -. _.. j
.-.4 . ..__..._...,..,_.v., ('
. .: =::=, =.=._ u..:.=._.=_:.=.=.::---=-- ..= ===.==:= = . .: . - : :. .=
- ~.,....d.
L
=__p__
1 -
..---m_ _._. - . . .
- . _ _ . _ . .__. _-.._==.:-=u=:--~._._=.=_._=.
. = - : :. . = = - ==:- - : : .
. . . . . _ . ......-.._...._..__..t...t__.._.,........
= ~ . .
-_...--- . r-- ._ ;. - . _ _ . . . . . ... . ....
i . _. . _ . _ . .. ... . .. .
i
_._. ... _ _ _,.... ., ._.__1 .
, . .=. . _ ._. g.~._._...m_,. . .. . . 1,
.:== .:.._:.=--=.u=_- -- - - -
.a ._ :.._
=:._._: v.:. um= . u . . ___ . : . ._ . v. . .:; _.
y
_- -- - _.:_ __. . .=. :==- :- - -- _.=_=. . =_::. :. t
~___::_\.; :.
. . . _ . - . _= ==_- - := =r= =~ : : . . : = - - __:._?.
, 2 _ _._,- _ _ . . _ _ _
i
. . ,t. .t.
.._._..____ ___. _ . . . . . . _ _ . _ ._____.._._L_.._.._...._......m.---__.__...... _ . . . _ ... ._..
_ i
. . . r. - __
, , _ _ . . . . _ . _ ~ . _ _ _ _. . _
_t,-4___.._.,.__.....,. . . _ . - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _..
.__.s.., _i_
. . . .. .t .....; . . .,
g .
. _r_. ..
.. .. _. ..---_ _ _ . ~ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _
}
. - i .s _
wp .... *
....4 9_4 +-, j . . s i i i 8 m__ *
,._. i I
6-.
8A
._. f ' .j ..9 ,
w,,,, t f___4 . . _ ._L_ L_...>
! 1 -_
.. . 9 . . . . . g
.,, i , , * , .
%u. . ._ _ _
. i I i, _4..f. 1 I , I a e e i i a . . .. , . . s .1 a a s 4 ie>- l
1. , , . . , . 10 . . I,dO 1000 t I -
Frequency -(Hz) * -
.4 .
?
AXIS S-S/V l
(~
.*f. v' .
L.CCATION .NO. W'c --
(
)
5 TEST RUN NO. M _
h p .
.* O er .
u. . e. ,
y ~
m ,
g ;, ( / .g ,., . fu O dim /h P' Piga No. 72 .
-; Report 2. 4 h D.i y,. ,L w o p. J ., ,
.. 3, y
sc .
i FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Pea.M
,i t-c.,
g 1.0 to 0 1c0 Q 1000 0 h DAMPING l 'L%l joo.--..._....._..__._..__,-_...._.__......_.._-..__,___........_-_.-
. g __
1
..-___.4......_._._.,_.....-._,... ;_.-._e .i--,- i. ...s..
.-, .. .-.-.-e_..4 ..
V, .. m . 4 - ..._._!.-.
~
kb i I.
f._-.ip._5_-M.7N.52-i F .15 U
~
.l.__-
t,
. ... , ._ ._. . . _. . .... .__._.L..
. .....t,._._.......___. _ _._ ._._ . _ _ _ _
9! _...__}-!_M-5"..
.....__._.,_....a.._..
il 5 . f5Md@--US
.. __ __ ... _. . . _. ._ .. . ... . .S .N 5 ' ~.
r .
.r.
.J . . . . ,.
. . , - . . . . . .._. ._. .. .. ....-. ._. ._ . . . . . .l . _ _ . , .
I .c,_.._..___.
4. +.__._._- . . . _ . _ . . _. ___ ._ _. ___ _. _. _ . . . ,
. +. }_. _ _ . . . . . .i_..-...._....
f ,.
1 e .::,,
,=.._...;,_, . l . - : t. -_
s ;- . . . _ . ... . _ . . . . . . _ . .
= =._=.=.. ==_-..._ _ .._.,_ ._.u.._: ~
_t=: _.. : _= -n : :._: 1.- _. : , . _._
a

. . .u : . :.. . n. =. .=. - :. _=._:. . =.. .; .- . I =.
.. .. . .... . x.....s s
._. .. .. .,.. ._ . __.. . _ ._. _ .. _. .__.. ._.....__....._.__......._.__....t._._.
s,.- ;-_. __._ _- s...; _
1, ..._ .. __ n.
~__._____ __ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . ., _. ,_ ... .
g ;.._ . _ . . _ . , _ _ _ _ . ,. _ . . _ . _ . .
..___.,__.....__.___a___,-___.._.._,...___.,.L......._____.~...
._ . _ . , . _ , ; _._ ... _ m. _ . .___
. _ _ _ . . _ .t.
..t.
f .. ,
,..g._..
o. . ..
..a.
. i . .g . . .. . : ,,
1.- - .
_. .< . a 1 i
g __ _ ...+ _4 t-_._.. ---i- "
d- - - i- ' ;-!., t i
. . _. . .p . H..._)
.t_____
j ._.._.
.....,r__..._....--_-___ ..a.._... - _ _ _ ..
.10. r_. . _ _
__....f..._-...._._.___..__.__.g.___.._-.....
___.,. -..._..._...._.-..a.
,____,.____,._,r_. ;_.___.. -t .._,_...;._,
, c ; y.. __, ._. _ _ - _. . . __ . . .e _ % . : . . _ ,. .. _. ._..._ , . . . _*-O*. , _.. .. _ .
,^^ *
._ .._._.- .. . ,. ._. _..__ ._. .____ .. .__"**D*
. . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ - . _ _ . . _ - .__ ___._., _. ... ......_..!.1-.__
a ! . .. _" ;. . .J. {
e g 7.
_. . . _ . .. _. .. ., .... .. . _ . __. .. . . . ~ . . _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _... . .
. . .... _ . .. . _. .y_._.. ..._.__... .._.._... .._ _. _ _ _
. . .. ..~
.. __ _ . . _ . ... _. ____. _. __.._..n._ .._ . ._ - .. . . _ . _ _ -
_ ._.._. _;. _ _ _ , _ . _ .._.. __ . _._.- - ..._ _...._ ,...r_L,,
. .a
" .s _._m+._,.____.
_-. ~ ~ ~ '-~ ~. . ~ -
~
~~~_+-.~.~._~.~~~'..'~~~~~',~_~.'_',~_~.-.~~~...~.~~.~~'~~~-4'~~'
~.
~
i_..'_.~~_.._,_s.-
~'_~~_~4'.~.~.
~
~ ^
/.d ;
. . . . . . ~.,: ._~.'C. s. . * . 2
.b.__ _ __ ? . ^- U.Y.. .:
' '. I..~5. . }
(&,.
^~~
_ ?_5 5. ._-5 ..
U.si ., _ _ (~'. .Wl_ N_.E.h ; ..V. __^5:. ; .; [5..-~_ .~ O : 5.s. _*.E. f.~_'._'.b_ . _ . _ _. _-_- .. . ., ._. . . . ' .. _. _. .. ... _ . _
1 . _ . . . . .
.e . . . . _ . . -. -
. .. ..L. .. .
.. _ . . . . . ..l,..
_._..p.._9..-_._.
e. . . ._ - .
8 m._.,_.__[_... _ _ . . ;_._,_
- . . . t . , g. . _ . . . _ . . .
,. . +., . . . . ... . . . I . e ,
.4-e_..-
.L . , ..._._,_e_......._,.___...e...I6._. .._
...4. .,.e.I~.,..J
.. ,6 . . . . . .
I .. . . .; .44 .- _
H...
. -+ + _ . , .
.1. t ..._t.e...
... .. e _._J J . 3. f
. .4.s. .
.; .i i
._. . . k
. __. __ l :
_ .i
.6.._. ..._5__.....
J._ . 9_. _ L . . . . L . . . ._ ._ ~.. . . . . _. ; .
i* .. _ . - ......4_ . . _ ._
. _ t . _. - . i . _. _..._.
4 . . . . . .- ,
_ .a. .
... p j q __ _ . s . . . ; - .j ..l...._,_y... ..,.j., ..[
j .- . ...g_ 4. p _ --- __. _. . .{. . . .
-a.4
~
1- --- - -. ...._ -- . . . _ . . _ - . _ . . -- _ . . . . -- _
.... ... r 4_ _... _ _ _ ._.._.t. ., q... .. 3
._.-_+- ,
..g p._ . _ . . _ _ ._7__.. i .g.... ,
._.,.q g._+ u_ _ __ , . . 4 _u +._..7._.-.,
p L. . . ._ _: .. : : . . _..:_ m_ _. _-t. _ .. .. .__ . . ... ._.c.. ...:::.c -:.: .;. .. .: _. .h a.n ..,,__-..=.--e
. , ... -'- - I.! ! >. c' .
I
.1.r.._.
. .. : . .:-. :.t=....
.. . _ .-.._. L.. . a. _.
. . _ _. ., ... a. _., , . ..... .. .
._...__._.._....___._._.__a.._.__.__......_..._...,._
. . -._..___y._.
l
,_f*_
. y_. _._ L.._._._
6... ... _ _ __ . _ ._. ..__. .._.. ._..._. ._.__
._. , . . . . ._~. .. ... . .. _.. .. . . a . .. ,
_._. ._ __ __ __ .......1......__..,..
y._- ;
.._. . . _ _ _ - . . . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . , . . _ . _ . . .. . . . . . . ;. . .5 3_..
z p..__,__., . . .
...u_.. 4 _. :
__:_...c._1__us._; u .. . . . . .
- , .em t
.=-- .- :. ._:_ u._
...;. u ._:. = =..._;. = a
- : . . ux t _. .- = 2 x- .u : .r . _ ._.=.__...,...._._..-'._........._.._...:
. _u._._ ._ . _ _ - - .- r . .
_.__ __ _ 2 . _ ._ ... _. ,.m _- 7 u n := : n_-
. _#:- .t _ _ _ _ . _
- - . .r
_y..._
_ _.. _ ... ..._. _.,._ ..i. ..
.. .....s..J.*T*..
..._....a.... . . _ .. .. ._ . . . _ . . ..I....t
_...._T~.._._._.._...._-~_._.
__._;____ . _ _ _ , _,._ m__,_;
,. .. ... __ ._. ..___ . . .. ..._ . _..____..,.4... ..,
a_ . . _ ..- . - _ _ _ . _ .._.4....-._.._.;. . _ .__ _ . . _ ... _ _ _ , . _
. 1_
. q _ _. ._._., ; .._ _._.4_.._.... _ .
. . . ,i ._. .. . . . ;
_ , _ . . , . _y .,., .
.~
e._ -__. j _. .___.g F -t,-
j.__; l ; q.4 ,.._._ . F i- - - - h 1 - F ' - H -i 3 4 5 6 7 89*1 2 3 4 8 4 7 4 9P 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 100 10C0 I 10 .
/ Frequency (Hz)
AXIS -
..s.
. LOCATIC:: NO. N. 4 *
~
TEST RUN NO.
6 bQ7 ,
rn
a u
i Pip 50. 73 4 t port No. 42161-1
\ .
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g eak)
r. 1000 0
. . . 1.0 O to O 100 CD. .
DAMPING M
~ - .N. , - - -- - . .. -
- ..,_.3
. . ..r.... _..___.-.._ - - - - . _ . . .
__.-.--._...,q
p.. .... ... ... .. . .
s
. g. . , . _ _ _
--..._r.4_* 6._.=--
g .p......_......+-....;.*. :.qh:ri.fi--p_ i'-i H -h-i-M F:.4 N.v.-i . . :. ' - f .+.W .
p p. .
{ - :- M .-- ..i; 5 p. d r: Q F- . : :::
..:...~_.._._..t...___._..._..- - - . .. .. .... _ . _ . . . ......~....._u.L._..
. . _ ..-_ _... ,__ ..... . _ . . . . _ _.-...........1 _ . .. ..f.,.,1. . .
_. . . - __.._.rc._.___._._.... ._ .
-g...._.2..._._.
~ . .3 . __ _ .. , . . _
-....._.____4._.,..__.,..._.._._
-.....t.. 4.- . _ - _... . . . _- . -.- .
. ._. _- . L_. . ._
. . , . . ...~. ..
.. . . . . . .:. .. .t ...w. _ . .. .. .
t i,
.c. s... _ _ r.. . . :._--.- . . .. ... ...._.___._._....:.-::_.._2_x._.=_...-
. . ......,.....-.=:_.=.=..._=....a:..
.l. . . .
i<
_ : _ : . =_ . . . . . . . . .
. . .. . .I_' . . .. .t _ . . . . .. _
_ _ . . . _ . . . -_....._...._..._.._..,g_.___ _ . _ . . . .. ._. ... _ _ ... ... ...... ... .__ .- _ . . . _ . ,. .. _. ..,
l .. . . .:.r._. : .. :. . . . 3. .
_ . _ -~. - - -
. ~ . _ . - -
._._._.._...._J._,-1 .
. . _ _ _ _ --w _ . _._.___: _. _. _. - - ~s-. _ ._-
.: =. . _ .. _. _. .-_. - . . _a_.,
m.
._ ..,....n_.
_! ' ' i'
. . -s Y
+ ,-i_J. . J.-
' i r , .
4---i 1-
_4 4 1 3 4 1 I -
t-J ..
i.
?
, . . s . - . .
..._.a
..._....j
. ..f.___._,_. % -.. - . . . _ . - .-.;_.. .
,.. .j _. . ;_. . m....-_..._q
.'p._.__..g......
_ .c- ..=_ -. .j __._ . . . .
. . . ....-.\.. .
. u. .a.
r __.._- _ _. _~ .- _. . _- _ _.. ._-.
. . .. n.. .. .l,
.. n. . _ _.w.
-__.m..
._,-...__.._.2_._...._ ....._._; _~.__. _ _ . %.. __ _;.._. - . . __; . . _..
_ _ . . _ _ _.~.._........__._.._72._.,_.,_._....i*
m. .
__. _. ._ . . c
3. . a t ._ _ _. _ __ f . . . . ~_. t . ..
s;_._____.._._.. .
c, _. . _ . . _ .. . _ . _ . _
- _ ___- .._ -___ ; ._. _ . . 4 .
-~
.- . w --.a _m, .- : z 0-. . _
e ._ s _,_
v _. ..,_ f ~
.e -L p,
_ . . .- _ - . _ _ . _ _ . . . . . .~_~. ._ __ .~_T~ .5 5 ? 5 .5~-~~~~h5:S - .~. 5. ~i.t^_5_W _.5-!b.
(% 1- . _-.f_ .. . _ . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ ..l.5 . . . 5. .5_:::. . . _ . -'k_5=~_"u C $.~- ; f.5E ~~W. :-i-m W ::-5 _
o _....___.___.._.. e. .
.,.s_.. _ _t... _ __. . . . . ....!--.. .... . _ . . . .
_. . .._... n.....
n L. . , .., .
_ . ~ .._-t - ._. . .-_ _ ....,,I .. .e .... ..
4.. {.....--..---,--4*a-..4.,.
..._... _. _+_......,.._ . _
- * -- +=t-
._.__.4__
4 g
,,,aL.. . ._. .M_I._..
_. + . . . -
4 .
-t- 4 j
._-. . , m . -. . .+.
,r. m_ y ,.
W6 ,
Oe uy _ , .- y -;
r q _,. + R, , _ -
4, _- e_f _ . ; ,
- ;_.4 I q...j. 4.h l .. 4. . g . .4._1 t }.
r
. . ..q . i I :g, l
..2_.:.
~_.....__._.....a...
_.._...__.._.-._..j .
g .
___.....,_...+..,.t_-.
.i.;. _ - = . _ _ . , . .. _._ _.- -
-p._._.
,. .. , .., . 4 _.r . 3 7. p -- _
. . : a ._: . - .....:. s..: x
. : _.== ; _ . . i . . . . . . s
' o _.: _: . _:. L.: . = : . = ; . _: .=.= : .
- :._ = .: _
- = :- == ~ .:. :: . :=_. _ . _=. . _ . ..e . . r .
t .. s. _ .:. ., .__..._.z.._.i_.,._..,-..1
__ . .=_= _ _ _ . _= _ . :. : . . - .- = . ::= . - a : -,
t ..=.= . = .:_._._. - - . - - : . - - . _._. _: ._: _. . - _ . . _ . .
. . . . . .. .. .. ,. .. . _... 4
._...__._._.__..L..,..
- - - .. C ._.,.,
. 4= . .- _ .
i 6..-
P. _ --t.____._..__._
u., :<__ :._ . r p.: q . : s . i .: : =_ _ =:.- .u. _. :a--_r.:2_;- : . .:.
e r- : .r .. ..:...r_._.n _q.
'2 - m .. :: . z. : . - : .-. n . - _ =. u .. t .r : : i . -
F. . ... - . . _ -..i _ :=.. __._ _
_. _. ., _ _ .=r. .::__. ._: .=:;=. _-.__ r:r r--. .-_-_ . _.._.t_.. ._.
.._.2.
_ , _ - . _ . . . _ _ . _ ._ . . . _ . ... -. - - ........t.. . . . _ . . .
n- __. .- -. .r. . - - - _ . _ . . _ _ _ . _
. r.__-._ ._-
=-
. . . . . _. ..].. . e e. .
_.- ..._. _I. ...._ - ..,,.5:
L . _-. -_.; --.. . .+....J
,4 .
_p - m . , p.
__ .. p _f.'._9... ,4.;
_l. ,
-,Q
_..t t .
, m r-
\ , ,
i: >
m -ic.t.. m
, i-- .,_._ ,
i i-
, ;- :-7 r, , , ,
2 3 a s a 7 e 1 ::
e s a r s , **
a s a 7 e s :o a a 1000 t
a 10 100
1
{
. frequency (Hz) g.s I
AXIS b .
M i
- LOCATION tsO.
l ..
I TEST RUN NO. _. M .
g *
'I
w. e . . _ , ,. . emrmw..
C- D "W w n -- _ . - y ... .
. 4
. s. .
t P:g3 No. 49
.- \\ P4 port No. 43961-1 l'
, s
- FULL SCALE SHOCK SPEC'IRUM'(g Peak) .
i 1.0 O 10 O tcoE) 1000 O T
._ , a DAMPING e WJ m
c.__._____ _
_ . _ . .__...,_,-_j 9v. _ . - - - ., - . _ . .
-_..._-.-..~._..._.-,i ,
e r.. . _ _ .
.m.q I
r . _ _ . . .
.A. .- .....,. ~ .g l
a-
._ + ..
..._._22:
.= . t. _ - . -
v. _- .
_- .2: .: a - : .- -- :_. : n._ .=_. .. =.- _ -__.._. _ . . . . . . . .
. . _ . . . . . . . u. = : = :. _: _. _r. =... _= _=.: ..- . _- .y
,. ,4 m: . : . . : .:_ . .=_ ru.._ _ :. ..e E. ___.
~ _ _
_ -__.,.___T_..._.__._. _ =. -<
_ _ _ . .__a._...._.___._.-.. . _ . _
_m._ . =.. . r _..; a .n_.
. c.t :. 2. . .;. u. r : ..... .; =_~.s. . . _:a. .,,
s '
..u. . . . . .. ._~
. .: :: =
_c.
. . .:..a. =_._..___.: .. . . . =. _ . :. :.. .:. ._.-. . _ . .. ._. . . . _.
g : . : .. : ...=.:q -_........_r..___...a.
_. . .c__ . . ..:.:.4. .; n.._. .:.r =. ..c.a..
_ . ....._.... . . .: m_.
_ r _...._ _ _ __._ __ ......
. . ._ .. .- ._ . . _. ]
..._..w. . _ _ _
.. . . . ......._..1.__.._._._..__. ._~, ..__. _ _..__ . ___ ._.. _ _ ._ _ _.............t._...
. . . . . _ . _ - -. . __ . _ _- . _. . _. _-. -.... ...... _. _ .....}-.......,
g._ .4.
I.,
. _. - . ... L. _.. .,_._.,......_ _ . ,.;.._. _,. ., _ ~- ....;._.
.m _. , . .._.__..m. ..__ .
p ..
. - - . _ _ , . .. .p ,_ .l.
-i h p; 7_. .H. [ . .7 __.r__ . .t..
N.p . _
p_.m._, j H .
.f.f._ _L
{
- Q-1 l -.
4. _.[_ '
.. .._..._...,4 ._. . _ _ . ._..
t
_w ._.._. - _d,
_~
_-._..___.._...f_-_.___._____... - - .
3
.,w __,_ - _
9 ,i__ _-. . . . _./ . . _ . _ -.,.g._. .___ r _..
4
_c q
,__......g___..___ _ , . . _ .
.u_ w . : u--::a cu: = =.;2_u r. .u;=. . .
_ - - . .: . . ;.2.
- . s . : =- - - ---=. ==. . . _ -_.__.- = .. x_., = _.-a . _ :m. = .=: =.:
_ : -- uu= c -
_a L.u _2 : . m._ .=: = . _==
.---=-===-=-.- - _ _ _ . n._ . u- u_ _ u . = _ _=- ._ === - n .
c s_=-- _ 4 - _ . . _ - _ . . _ = . _ - - . .. . ._ _. ... _.- . . _ . . . _ ,
. m t
c. , _._..._.i.__ . _ _ _ .
_..4
_ . _-..= . _ - .
s_ =-_,
=
,.!a..__.=._.,_=.=.-==n.=__==.__.._=._=_=-==._.=.._==__===..=._=n.._=_= -- ._ . . _;J
._----__---n.._._._--
,.s.,.o__-__.:..----_.___._---.-~._...~..~- . _
_..__._ .., .._ .__. _. ._. ...___.. .._ .. .__ _ _ ._ . _ .- ._. .. . _ _ ._ _ _ . .._.. ... ... _ .-. . _ _ _.5, _ _
- . . _ _.- . . . . _ _ -.t_.__._...____._._.___________.__
~
- - - - * - - =
- - * - - ~ '
_, ,_. . .. _ _ _ _ ' _' +_' - .' - - * - * - - * -
o "' *=
_ . .. _ . . _ _ . , . _ . , . _ _ _.t ,
<p-o ..t ,
, ,, - _ _ u_ _ , . .
_ i , ,
t i ,. , . i ,
i
. \. ., i _.
-._ - . . _ _ . _ _ ._-_. t a, _ - _ _
_ . . . . _ _ .. -- y
, . L.r a .2 -
._.___.=.c:..c;..r.-=_=.___..*=
-===._-
i ; -m
=._=-.._ ; ; =;=_c. : c ; , _; - - - -. _.:-. ..u.. .a_ . r;
=.r.
.;; _. na- ;.; =.-;.

=.: .r
.. --=:. ..
3,____.____=__.
a 4,..._._ _.
L . . ;- N l
%===.-- - -..:...._; .2 .: * : 1
- -; -.i~1 ; . :;- ;= -. - . r == - - . __- - . : /-----"--.-t __ .
.:-- ru ; .: . .=:= .: as : : ;;:.:;-;; .:~:-- :.,.;;c.; ::v- ..- _
i_a: :;; . :: - :.- .c _- _:: -:- .' n _ : .- :. - .;--: = _. _==. . ._ _ _=__ . . ._. . _. _ _. _.. . _ _ _ _ __ ___. __. .. ._. ._. _
'o ..... 5 l
=.__.__._...__...,
_ := n=_ : : _ __ ___
._._._.._.___.._..-.__._.._._.._.____..__...___t._.._..
.= _ _ _ _ . . ._.
.. . . 1.. _,
. . . _q e
~~
3
.--i
--+-r .-- !
- 6 I f --.i .
I 3 I I 1 c
1
, ^ !, v t g f I
,_h i l
= ,
1.
, 1 , , .
. 4 2 2 4 6 6 'A5M b 2 3 ~4 s s 7 a 9:3 1000 .
3 a g g 7
8 to 100 6 , 3
' 10 1 .
Frequency (Hz) ,
5.:Shr 4
,r AXIS >
s-G LOCATION NO. _ ' M
TEST RUN 'NO.
d I Pop r(7 ,
R o
NHNW COB @f APPS21X A l .- .
PROJECT E " u T C O v e 9'.'l st-3147 cm fi n ca f*n1 I Cd LJ e.. LI a? r g93r qr es dhCif3J DESIGN BY CLM ', R:v. 1, 11-15-76 7 CNGINCCnc -
CHECKED SY .71*1 ..
' I I l I E l V. N O. l I l I !
yT t ' d a s 91 '
I IHtfl Att lC % f l l I l l f requexy. CPS
.s 20 10 10 11- 20 LO 1s 53
>>.. .... . ... .... . . . . . . g r :,
... , . . .j. .;.
n0 _. . .. .
a i -
~
j ne tso _ .
. l -
e 1 * --
I i j . ,
no
- i . , ,
to _ ,
t--
ii ; j
, . . , , 10 1
' ' I-i LO - i' i
-u I i i ii i l (0
l- l I f l
l lll s.c s.0
- I I
I- I llll l a r
(.
l i l I I
It 10 - i ;
1 i -
j L' -
. , ! $% DAMPII'O -
l 7-)
-l% DAMPING I l 1 i ! .
}i y '
5 I /
L5 g! ' 2%5% DAMPING :
! I '. i DAMPING tg
~
e i
' ,_/[
?
I I ,/ .
8
^
,3
{
_ /_ / .
6 1
?
' i i 4 g
- . _- \
'f / t i
. ; -i -;
2 \/ i i i t
{ T
i !
i
? V i 6 i ! l t ! f
"{
- : 1 yx i i i j ^j i I 7>J; 1
X ', - . : i \ ,
x\,\
j ;- i
- : I I l !! ,
1 i
! I l^
s ' '
L J-i s-l ;!
! I f, Q ,
x i l
/ -]., i, I ' '
i r
I '
I! !
e f - ---
f,'
.is og *
) ,
30 -
l
, , l i x % ., .12 p -
i
' + i i i i
N NN'g q -i
g i ;
$l5-J - 1 i i j i s I t i IN K -
3 !i!,!, .l , \ l y ~eeee r e r el , ! i . r 5, ,l.,,, ,,, ,,ii ,,,, , ,
to a .6 .: to ts q[ .cz .c a .e .os .os . a .2 4 .s rww. s.c.
9.
.- HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING EASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH A-2 q ;
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, Q ELEVATION: 5908-0" l
l
CLtENT I E T M 0 1 T E D 1 w I. gppgy, 3 1 hj, ,
PROJECT errtTcq ever.*T st_3147 vah Q ,A D 72 6 C.a v L-6 g g rge/ 4 DESIGN BY Cl F ,
,Rev. 1, 11-15-76 1CNCINCC AG - CHECKED DY T;G M -
l t R Y. H O. ! l
. ry J. ! !
DATE q
" IHlflALSl^
f l I l fret ency. CPS p ,
II 10 M 10 LO .s 50 33 20 10
'Clo ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i'''' '! '; ' ' ' ' ' '
f3 l-
" ! i :
, i --
i
- --- i .
n.o
. tu _ . . 4 ,
I i i :
i ; l
]
' 110 to_ . i , ,
L $f'. DAMPINIT . . i ,
- . t i i / O - Ifa DAMPING I ' i 33
"- ' i V /_ 2,'f; DAMPING ' '
!I T f .57, DAMPING . - Ii M
-. ]' / /
~
I ! '
u - _ - - ,
' l l '
il 'i u e u
~
((
~
I
- u
~
I / / ! l ! II u i in i j l J ll /r-V /! I i Iil i i 10 I :
i
' D d 10 , ,
g ts :
l
!' I f{ i i
~, ts i '
. i , -I ,
L- i I i .
{ ?'
i
-/ N n\
n ,
ii, i m a ., y U y - i !7 ~ .3_ i i i it
? -
// i N - i l l 1 i 1 k - '
// / I M i i l i 1
'3
-l' ~,
]L \\\\ ! I i l .,
] .,
i l i i f \.\h 'I
! i 5
3 i
l I i !
l xs
- ?
/l l ,,
.n
! [ ]; i
.a
\ y;
~
- I
l -
l 18
- i
, i i
. x w 13
. i .
i 4 , .
i N
I i l ! \ . _
U - i i I I I I i i N ' -i
- ,,,,l,,,,I,I, . . . ,l,... ...I.,,,,,,,I,l,!,l,i,,l,h\,
.w .cs .o6 .os .: '
.n .2 .3 .a .s .a . to ts a
.ar .as ter% s.:.
U . HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESFCNSE SPECTRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHO.UAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST-WEST A-3 COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, l ELEVATION: 590'-0" e
. CLIENT ne'"nnTm enT90M APPENDI:: B SARGEDTaturmy ;ag gec'g"s'glzm .
$7 u u ,e
^
AU- CHECKED BY o u I
s t Y. N o. i i i DATE #3 r( H INITIALS *M.$ 1 l Frequency. CPS
~' 3I % 1) to to * .5 10 10
. . .y i
. gg M9 .
, . .,. .... .... .. i.. i ,
l l
~
[ M.0 ,,
- -*-- I .. ..p .L . _ . . . . _. . . . . nD I
e l
l. * .
-l gg b i'c b_ i
' i ! ._. 1 l . .
-i g ,
Li _ ,
s
- - I ao i *
- . . i > l .?
s
...l ...... '
i .. ia ao - - - - - -.-i ..
a a, - i. '
l 3.o 10 ..
- I l l "
ry to .
I. l i i n
i; : l' : ,
i ; i l 1 - -
I I I yg 10 ,
I i '. .
t l 1 i '
; f ,
A 10 ' .
j . j .
i :
.~
. , l l I l l -
ts 0 ts -: -
P : I , I i i i ~
5 - -
. I. I !
~
I I ! I i 3 tC to . s s r , . .
p l _ . , i !
u e
i ! i i ; ! I i ! '
i i ', {
i i I 6 1 4 ?
~
yd .i
( '.
l S - I ; i sI
. i i
4
[-
! /v /,F) d:.$fo 1% DAMPING DAMPING DAMPING l I !l ~
,,j 5% DAMPING l 3 l ./ .-
. , i ; .
a . .
0 E- i s / /'/ j/-~ Ni l i ! !
" , ..a
. y -p/ \ i -
I 0 ,, ! 1 c,
a !
u -~
..i.. I.-- -- , ].:o
(( .\ - . - x
~ 4 0
g, -
, W._ i \.,
y I
i p .
f
' i i i , , , , , . , l . , , , x'.,,,i,N! . . i. , .,.,,..~.n g
j
.os
.et _ f' '.s'i' ' ' '.os .* .M .os .i .o ., .s 4 .s .6 .. Le ts to Periar. Sec.
VKitTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA 109-Oli-VW Ol'KliATING EASIS EARTHQUAKE R Il . ll . it . COMPLEX, WALLS AND s-2 M STAtt NO. IA, ELEVATION: 590'-0" L
e C APPENDIX A PROJECT __r2Tc0 v R*.iT , gg_3147 b, O [j((q[d,"jgy DESIGN BY_ 0 01 .
,Rev. 1, 11-15-76 1RN CIN Sct-t C -
CHECKED BY 37M .
) I s a y. N o. i DATI 'c * ?.
,l INITI AL5 ." a 5 l ,!
Freguancy. CP5 .
l 10 10 .5 to 10 13
, 30 31 2 . ..
no m_ .... . .., . . .
.),,, ,.,. . . , .... -..., . . ... . .
s 15.0 i ,
L
118
! 5 2 l l .
1 i '
l I i l 20 9 i ,
me _ i i --
t, - ', ,
__u u_
i j ,
, j ,
! u f I . j
---i l' se Ji l l u a I 1 I i -
u o . i , ,
i l l1 :
I, ,
10 le
)
J L9 LO 1% DAMPING ~u i
~
t l 2% DAMPING ;
p.
~
u .
.' l 5% DAMPING
t. ! i l T
, j ; , A O% DAMPING ,
---^-~U
" e s , //// , ; 3 is[
//// ! I ' !
~ '
? I ' I -
i -i '
i
- . i -
. (. N //// '
i t ! i !
l i 1
? - : i ) NV // ~
I ! l I N N f ~ l * - t w,
\ [ [!
N i i ii i
'5 i -
i i i s
N, i
f,1 1-i !.
l J i
l l
E- -
[
[
~
t ; -
i ,
I
- ~ 1 2
- I j- ,
- . 4
_ g _
. l }
D *
. ]
i i . . . t \\ % 3N
- l i t i .
i NN ,_ 4 ,,
3 - i l i . 6 i , '
I \\:
j i i ; i t i ; j \\ .
. I
, , , . I b 1'
,,,,I,l, el, , ,1,.,, . , , , ' , , , , ..,, , ,!,I,I, ,
.,i,
.i .15 2 a 4 5 .s .: to u to
.a .m .os .m .m .m rerw. s.:.
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE A-6
R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH t COMPOG NT SLAB NO. 1 f
ELEVATION: 590'-0" t' m m
j nevt..w u 1 PROJECT E!mICO FE.T1I sL-3147 v.g Q 4 tD albT!]"Q as I b.J PM s 8 {E DESIGN BY C T .M ' Rev. 1, 11-15-76 3 I CN a t.'J a c m s -
CHEChCD BY SGM -
I a f V. N O. f I DATI t > - ri '4 l 8
INITIALS ' M. f. T l l l l
frequency. CPS 9 ,
s.0 13 10 LO .5 )
50 33 2 10 . . . .a , 0 i no.
,,.;.i.I.
i
.I. :
gg l
4.
7 d -. ._ .. :
~ .. .
gg,g I j - _
e ! - -
. i
- . i l i i '
, 10 0 14 3 _ . i } ' -
l f- -
i i 4 s _ .
4
, , g ic to .,
~~~
i ;
Ie
- l j '
l l
l ea __ . _ _ _. ., . , --
l l l u I ' l
.lg ppgpygg 10 g Eo I i 2% DAMPING ll a :
I l
/. -5% DAMPING ! '
! n U
to 10% DAMP:I I
i .
i .
b r- 5 l'
[ to
10 t3 i
i i
l/ Ij\ :
i i
i' l l ts l
l k i I
~
- e*
' /
u - ' '#/ /\ \ \
' I i i i i
/ p\\\ l O
1.3 4 t
i
/ f ' u\ \\ -
i ! i ! i i J
{
-i :
" - i f/ / \\ \\ -
t i i i 1
$ '.'3
/U \\ W ! l ! IiI (i','
I j -
i i ! # .NN N! l I lil n
i i
/ '
, NK %i l l l w i,a-Li -
j i ; ,
E- l ; i
, .4 25
.15 - .
~ [
l
~ ' i *
! ' \ '.lc*
lo i i ,
, i ,. x xg 1 i i
~
! I
', \ \k -j '3
.08 i i i . i i \W j - 1
. ,i 1
. i ! 3,3 U' .06 1.5
.i '.4 t '
.as ' '.m. . ' ' ' .ts .: u ts za
.05
'.0z ' ' ' ' .as ' ' ' '.os ' .ns .z .s .6 Perlad, $ec.
U .
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTPA
~
DESIGN EASIS EARTHQ.UAKE R.II.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST A-7
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, ELEVATION: 590'-0" m
. /gPPENDIX B CLIENT D?T'POIT FDT ?O
SL-3147 PROJECT Tr:Tc0 CEn i Rw.1. H-U-M c ,3 u n.bd n mu'^d-m t aim m d b Lit.U idl.)vf. DESIGN DY CLM ,
ICNCINCizrac -
CHECKED BY SGM
( t l l !
u v. w o. 1
,:-, e 4 ' i i !
' ons I t
. m n s i< - 5 (
- iw r, ncy ces i
10 LC
10 13 so 33 20 ~.0
8 6 ' '' ' ' *i' '
j 2 A3
' '6 +* * * ' ' 'i i' ' ' l J g
e4 14 0 , *
' ! I d
', ] 15.0 I' --
} lie , ; [
] I ! l i :
7
I ll
.10 j
E0 _
, { ; ,
' i ,
i ; i y'
t i
- r i .
i l i -j L' , . - r .
, I i i i
( ,so
,?l LO l - n.i t
i ' I l1 i'
[ -4 5.0 4 -
10 l i
' l '
" l- to l l I ' '
ll*; :
1 o i
l l
- : 1 1
! l -
~
to 10 I
} i
, 2 ,
*0 2.0 * ' ' l 1
}
._ I I -
-' - t, t,
l, 1 a :-
l 1
It g LO ; , ,
~
i i i J
-. ' r
, i t 1
, ; i i i i
i ; i
- F - i I I )
i { } -j ' k b
qali
,i] i - ,
t
l i
j'- -1% DAMPE 0 t
, j j 2% DAMPIIG i ,1 L1 ?,
j 5
I I'I [ 5% DAMPING l
j
n
'4 t ,
'< f,10% DAMPING l
! l -
E l
l.
l / ,- e i ' -
(": ' -
\ T/ j
~
I ,
j -
'/ -
d
.2 I' ,
j d,
? :
/
/
/
[
}
x /I I '
I e
'3 iX X l t i
" i J. 3
.f x x 4 x. F ef ,
du i
E, -f i i i NA \\ ' i 1' m ,,,
i i ! NN \\
l\A \\ i j.
' I i i ,
,,,,1 X,\ M I,,,
! , , . . L,
,,,,1,I, , ,i. . ,!,,,,l,,.I,,,,
n ,,, , , , ,
.a .a .os .t, .2 .3 .4 .s .s to ts to g .= .e .as .i r,rw. s.c.
B VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA
' DESIGU EASIS EARTHQUAKE B-8 M R.H.R. COMPLEX, WALLS AND ll5-DB-VW SLAB HO lA, ELEVATION: 590'-0" U
s
c__ __n, __n,_na.,_. . _ n , .- .-
,' FERMI UNIT 2 [ Project # t> 13 9-4 0 ,
c.
' J.. W.. .,,..,_
a a . c.m,...-J .,. >
EQUIPMENT DYtAMIC d EMD File n
[
g ;;t,1;Qu. , OUALIFICATIOi!
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 ,,
-_..=___..________-m__.,..__
l FERMI NUCLEAR STATICU UI!1T 2 >
DETROIT EDISci! ColiPANY i l
BALAUCE OF PLA.NT EQUIPNEf1T DYI1AMIC QUALIFICATICil sui', MARY i EQUIPMENT NAME: P3 mervice Water Pump Ansembly (Pump and Motor) 1 EQUIPMENT NO. : R3000cu05/c006/c007/C098 SPEC. NO,: DECO 3071 -134 LOCATION: PJiR Craplex Elevation 590'-0" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: O ACTIVE [] PASSIVE l QUALIFICATI0i; DCCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1. Mcdonald Engineering Analysis Co. Report #ME-230, dated June 20, 1973. ,
2. Coulds Pomps 1;rawing No. N-302276, Rev. H2, Pump Outline Drawing. !
i
3. Detroit Edison File No. S22-189 Pump Assembly Drawing. l 4 Detroit Edison Speci f ica t ion 3071-134.
5. Sary,ent & Lundy SL-3147, Rev. 1, 11-15-76, Appendices A and II.
l l
l I
I MEJIMEDCU5amW3JMEWiMYTAS** MIL" NAE *?I.T*J'">I*JM RWi*miTLNaF42MifLF'aiFlil G%'N*Ga*E&Z451DM*M.6*!F4WS:ihdeMn rgggm's:_'
e (
Prepared by: e d. L Date: "I 19 -91
] Reviewed by: Date:
! Approved by: Date:
o 6
---m-----an - - ~~-unn_ o.--n__;, ~ ~ =n
i <
i ;,.
_ m-.- m. - - - ,- m. -~_
7- l j E FERMI UNIT 2 Project #61.29-40 '
i
{ - .
C['deEYO[.IT3V I EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ][jODFile # g l kl -::N "v C H 3C AuO ;'
asi)4 OUALIFICATI0i!
SUMMARY
! Page 2 of 6 I:
4 q q [; <
4 feane;sseavanw:se=n zst-wursrei!:awa -m-r.;m:rer; _;,.e. _,,-- murwsummamasmuencutwmawns,,.nuam) l 1
i i QUALIFICATI0il SUMARY -
i i
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
l i
8 5 OBE/SSE Seismic Loads 1 1 l
1 l l 4
j ORIGINAL QUALIFICATI0tl METHOD:
4 m
t ;'
A multidegree of freedon modal analysis was performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-11. Type of elements used in analysis were b.re.;.n. -
i, I
i Seismic Loads were combined with normal opdrating seismic loada and stresses ;
} were crampared with allo.cobles. l fjEQUALIFICATION METHOD:
l The new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in j original qualification. The additianal stressen due to new more conservative G values wi)) be added to existing actual stresses and j the resulta were compared with code allownblet.. i
[
t 2
. [
(
{
t b
2 i
k l
l 1,
i i
--w --w mn wwerve w -
w_._ .-rvee=,---_ __ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = ~
.. _. .- = _
I M b- - , - -' [MMk ). - , , . - . - - - - - , .- + Ja M N $ d- 'l -T @ $
FERMI Ui!IT 2 1, Project 96139-40 h
n
,4 e, - m ~ 7.m, . ,L7.~ m. a ""
.! J EQU PI'ENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
, t. . u . , m a , ,
[i d
_; = o.u.. m.i e QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 s
, ;)
- cmeme >
ll
g a 4 4 -
J N.simonste414tdweGIrNN.%uimuwaswur4vi3w masts avshc.xsgs%wtasir?AN9%w mmL e imt<*a%eutse v I
I QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT !
! I. PL10!T NAME: FI'RMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @C
3. A/E: Det/ cit Edison /Sargent & Lundy l
. .. I CO?!POMENT M?d!E: I II. Diesel Generator Service Water Pump Assemblies i
l
1. S' ope: C "SS' [X"l BOP 50 HP, 1760 RPM VSS l 3
2. Model Nur.ber: 8x12 .ntc-2 STCfHT TI,_LENct..) Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: coulds Punpa, A M I M M M pga.
! 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and rcodel ':o.
of the devices included:n/a i .
r 5. Physical Description Api,carance: Vertical Turbin.c_h tp__ _
Mo mt ,d to a vert ical mot or -ia a complinr. _
4990 lbs Dimensions: 43'-l1 5/8" (lon *) v 11 313"_fgjg Weight : total weC
. 6. Location: Building: UHR Comple: Elev . : s90 '_o" -
i
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
[R} Bolting: Number: 4 Size: 7/8"O O Welding: Weld Tyep:
[ Leg: Length: Pitch:
0
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
i 4
Lateral :M, 4 . 3 4 , 12_. 7 7 . 14 . 2 4 E . 7 4 H z.
, Vertical: >33 Itz i
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test
! [{l Analysin C Other ,
10. a. System in which located: D.G. !
i 4
b. Functional description: -Ma+.nta+.n-F>erv-iee--Wa ter-t empe ra tti I r e to the Emer. D.G. systcm i
l C. Equipment required for: ,
f C Ilot Standby U] Cold Shutdown M Post LC,CA f
- a
-v*~ v--ye--w-p -
y.w--w yw- wwv -g-wm,,__ _ _ . _ , , _ --;--me,-, -p-g-- - - - --My--w-eqws--r-----~'e -- P+--=rh *-e----w--wT-m-r *-** - - ' ' * - - - - - " "
- - -a-.~ ~...~mme nnumm,,nr.,~.-_ ---,m
FERMI UNIT 2 ,
Project #G139-<;0 i S!T:GEDT& LLODY ? EQUIPMENT DYt1AfilC {EMDFilei; ;
. :: N m m: 2.N L : OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
4 Page 4 ef 6 ,
j c % c ac.c.
g [
__a_-. - _ - _ , . - _ . , _ _ _ , _ _ _ __
11. Pertinent reference design specifications: Deco 3071-114 III. IS EOUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLAUT: @ Yes O No IV. EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test 11 Analysis q O Combination of Test and Analysis
1. Qualification Report
" Seismic Stress Analysir, of ASSIE Section III Class 3
a. 'l,itle : Puons" MDIXIT She 8~ ! ? Efr--?
b. Number and Date: ME-230 Juno 20 1975
2. Company that prepared report: Mcdonald Enrineerine Analysis Co.
3. Company that reviewed report:The Detroit FS son Cononny V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Leads considered: @ Seismic only O Hydrodynamic only O Seismic and nydrodynamic Other (Specify):_
O
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
SL-3147, Rev. 1, 11-15-76, A-6. A-7. B-6. B 4 11 - 1 0
3. Method of combining Requiring Responso Spectra:
Absolute Sum SRSS
4. Damping Upset (OBE) : 1% Basis for damping:peu cniao 131 l Emerg. (SSE): :p
5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required) :
0 ZPA Other (Specify) :
Upset (OBE) : F/B= S/S= V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= S/S=_ V=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O yes Describe loads and how they were treated an overall qualification program:
@ No l
i l
' ew%aneew - -- . _ _ _ .2r-- _ -- -M@mM- - - -n-,-
- ^ Instwer*:wMtw
'l 9
FhMI UNIT 2 [i Project a6139-40 f l m ,w.y ij (J ,em,J*
a ,,, ;
. . - ,f p p 4 t,j c ......._....,d j EQUIPMENT DYNAfilC ij EMD File # y h
[ T *.$2bA )' OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
l1} Page 5 of 6 )
IDyf .--
4
-e_xMS-- mtsn;:arUmanuivnes.wtoasser.wst.*marms.rreen%kesazuss- --- -a w> utar.M 9 { ,
I VI. IF QUALIFICIsTION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: INA i
1. Test Method: O Single f requenc,y :
O Multiele frequency:
2. Input Motion: O Singio axis i
O Multi axis O
3. No. of qualification tests: l Upset (OBE) Emerg.(SSE)
)
i 4. Frequency range: 4 1
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS? '
s No O Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V: _
, Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Labcaratory mounting:
O Bolting: Number: Size i
O Welding: Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 0
8. Functional operability verified: 0 Yes O No O Not applicable
9. Test results including modifications made:
10. Other tests performed:
VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis i
l U Static analysis Static coefficient analysis O Dynamic analysis: @ Response spectrum l
l Tirac history
2. Model type:
l C 1-dimensional l E] 2-dimensional O 3-dimensional t
- - ._- . . . . - , . . . _ , - _ _ - _ , ~ . _ - - . _ _ _ . - - - . . - - _ - - - - - . . -_ - ..
i l
i .
7 =mm rz . m_,.._ s =c_wr.m_m o n =- - = n---r=::= u.. -- r:r.- .
. ) _'
t FERMI UNIT 2 li Project #6139-40
, [!- r rr-g w_ - ~a u,. Jpo,m, 3 p - - 2
t. - .;
r l <;: y ,,
h EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC i
' EMD File #
rea w na : U d .
y c me -c.o 3
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
L Page 6 of 6 ll Cx_m.n.m-m.u mummzuwanna unw,~nw-==mmt.x=wn ermnard
3. Method of analysis:
i @ Computer-aided calculation
, praarams used: IC.'s-S1RUDL II C Hand calculctions O --
4. Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: y Yes [ No
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
See Comments.
i 1
Element Calc Allow t
Stress Stress Maximum Column Stress, PSI 7,586 24,750 Max. Column Flange Stress, PSI 13,liF 28,875 Bolt Stress, PSI 24,320 27,500 Max. Pump Flange Stress, PSI 2,694 23.100 t
Bolt Stress, PSI 9,496 27,500 aax. Pump Casing Stress, PSI '
1,688 34,000 I
"ax. ", haft Stress, PSI 7,709 l 30,000 Motor dold Down Bolt Stress, PdI .
Tensile 133 ft 27,500 Shear 488 13.730 j Shaft Key Stress, PSI 4,000 10,000
! i Nozzle Stress, PSI 14,550 24,750 l Nozzle Flange Equivalent Pressure. PSIG 237 275 l'
Anchor Bolt Stress, PSI l
Tensile 10,578 22,000 Snear 2,139 13,000
) Discharge Head !!old Down Bolts Tensile 11,003 27,500 Shear 1,913 13,750 Discharge llend Stress, PSI 4,010 24,750 1
1 Discharge Henil Flange Stress, PSI 7,326 ? 8 ,8'/ 5 i Discharge IIend L' eld Stress, PSI 6,104 16,500 k- 1 i
(=m, w. , . . - - - - ~ ~
. uz-r-nz.=r- -s w .
n
.=, iy' =====~2--~--.
j: FERMI UillT 2 d Project #6139-40 +
r. ' . . * ~m~
c.'.101 i a R. m a. r. r'pt* a
" t, ,,
ECU1PMEf1T DYt1AMIC l # i, o m = =.u . ;
a emewoo CUALIFICATIOf1
SUMMARY
!l EMD File n s : f Page 620f 6 L'-
I
[gr smacumu.eur.amatwp tma.mveneluptmar2=W2WATsswT:rir%WLmmi: mm44=sresr"Innut:2s3.= Yqrtrc2;:?;j NJ. Method of analysis:
O Computcr-aided calculation prograras used:
O lland calculations O
% Ilave equipment supports been adequate.ty considered in analysis: O Yes [ No 1.N Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Element Calc Allow Stress Stresu
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) 1 Element Calc Allow Stress Stress Shaft Deflection, Inches .035 .05 Impeller Deflection (clearance), Inches .00001 .009 VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
OllE h SSE Values; OBE values in general are bounding.
y------em , - . - . ,.- -
j j CLIENT DETROIT EDYSDR1 AME ^
, rp e n PROJECT JP'Tcn ren"T - ~ -
st-3147 bhnitG! o ==ld~I Gd LUid'Mr
~
DESIGN BY CLM Rw. 1
11-15-76 p i!!NGIN C FI A 3 -
CHECKED BY SGM 4
/y
/.
j 1
\} a t v. w o. i l ll
. on: .,..i l I
IMITIAtl 8.* 5l f !
frowncy. CPS 10 LS .s 30 Il ~ E 10 is II
' ' ' ' . no nog a 'i' P - -- - '
tic -
co i ,
j l l ,
l l l l
, _ 2u me . , ,
E
t-*,,; , _
o u_ ; _
~
! i i I !I I I
u h
u u -
I M : i
i l l l[ i -
l 5.0 5.0
~
l l l 1 l l l llll. ! a
, o a i i La 4 i ) i lji' :
E ,
l ! la it 2
~
D n i -
m I
a j .
~
s !
' l ' l 71% DAMPING
~
15 2% DAMPING
' . P7 G/i ts ~
! i
' H l
l 5% DAMPING jj ~
! i l A ,/ 10% DAMPING i ;
t a
r- !
s i v t / / n ., v m ..,v,- .
8
,/ h / // ' 4 i g
_[
L I .
' .~
+
& >p , , _g x , f Ay , .r . , , -
g 4 ,
' 5 1 - I / N / //' -
i ! i i i 1 N\ l 1 ',d
( - -
l \ } // I i l ll l l 3 dh 3
N ! I IlIl I f
/ ., .4 l i D '
E ' Jr' i '! #L -
! !~
/ .N I!
3* .,
l_q . ~
i-l A
, t l l l\ ' ,
. ,h l _ .1,
,._ . , (
g
- l
- l- ' ! ! i '
'i ,.
3,
.- e t
. . . .NN v. -1 * * * .
i . , i. -
NN 1 i..
(
" e , i; i . !
, - i NNg X
- i I t : : I I i i ;i
.c.
.a
!'e I 4 I I ,! I ,>l , . ! ' d .3
> ! 'a ! ' .Il ' .: !to -
' , - - ir e n .3 i! t .
ts a f .o .c4 .e .a .o .i .ts ., .3 4 a
.c:
L' ec4 s.r.
..A L1 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA '
DESIGN Ha. SIS EARTHQUAKE ElC@ll R.H.R. C0"PLE"(, NORTH-SOUTH .J A-6 Q. '
U CO';F0;2;.'? SU.B NO. 1 L EVATION: 590'-0"
R CLIENT DEC.0IT EDISON I AN_.' ' ". ^.. ^
PROJECT EN3TCO FERMI Ll
q v/r m a e-. .IiD d Uld I $ { r i a'
/
DES!GN SY CLM
11-15-76
i iCNGINEZERSJ CHECKED BY SGM i q
.c
- v. o. l . l l l l l i
.u. ..... .., i i 3
iwmus u. s I i ! j i !
freewerer. CP5 .
T, M 10 11 Z2 10 .S
w 31 n,
....g . .
g, ;. . .... ...i.,.i.....x. . ... ...., . .._
~
m
l l l a - -
ju ,1,-- : ,. 2_ i. .. .
._ . 4 u,
.l l
_ . , i .i . , -
28 n:p , l . _
i i i 4
m u to tc'_ . , i ; im .
.i _
_T i '
i il -
- i f - ^ to u -- ,
.g,
!q ic[ -l% D!aiPII:0
! . i ~
~ '
! ! ! k I 2% DAEPII!G !l ! u u
D . . 3. ,
M *
if ITA 2Is DIQ'28.'G '
i, i
{ -
. t _t / I !! -
1, jp 1,
_ i : i i ! ' '# 1 i : i il i i eQ, .( _ U_
i -
i
/ , .
l O 5
// Yk ! l e U, -
h ",
4
! 794/ /\ \ \ \ 6 .
l 'rt i / 7/ / r\\N N > .
i i 4 d'
J { . i / // / ,
' s _'\ N N N i
? - . I / // / \ .( \\ \ .
i i i i !
y$ - i I/ /[/ \. \ \\\' * - I ' i l i i I d j ,f j_j '! .f \\ \. ! l l.; ! - .j
- l :
1 i
e r
' li! ii i :
1 ' 3 a :
~
j .
g
i
1 i .
i 2
[ 1 -
I' a iL E : . l -
i' ! ,
.3 i
.D - . . i . ,
! I i
i j i

' ,[]
i - .
8
- . 3 . xo x 4 13 b
\%\d x I7
.m F i i. . t _
. i NW V U
l i
'. l 1 . . . I \\, ___, ,
.a
! , [_;i. l . I , ! l .1 , i \\ (a
} .32
.O .M
.25 .06 08
,i .
.I
.D .2
,,,l.,..i
.3 4
.5 6 .8 LO LS 10 Park 4 $ec.
s
.Q '
,: o t.i HORIZ0hTAL FLOCR RESPONSE SPEC:TRA DESIGli EASIS EAP.THQUAKE .
R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST ~ gbg g A-7 3 COMPO!1Eh? SLA3 NO. 1, J
590!-0" ELEVATION: - . . - .
CLIENT M P?,TT EDIFOM APPENDIX 3 Ijg -- il PROJECT 7'::Tc0 eE "T SL-3147
. rm - g ,3 u RW. 1, 11- M p;.yv'd d us di3 I (e$1 f.l.J & J ' DES!GN BY CL*4 IONQlNTMZ Asi CHECKED BY SGI4 .
l ! .
t t v. N O. l I I f q DATI l l
' =
(, ls : -I t 7.] '
I N if l A L 5 'r< < 5l l l l 8
fretuency. CPS 11 10 10 .5 -
11 PJ 10 10
%)
l.
go-_.... ...., . . .
.,.,..........g.... . 1
.y.
I,j .
f ! #
. ' J.2 LO
~
i l i :
w.o --
I I
l: t i
i i
o . .
, , i; .,,
j g ,
to _.
i . el
~ - ~
i LT _ L l .u 1il a
so _1 i
l p
l -
se I l l I l ! lll 1c 1 -
to -
; I i i' i d i i i ' I 3 I l t
- : I ! ' i l I 15 le n :
l. I .'
3 J
l r..
la- *-
3 -
to ! - :
j
.i i
,I
y. .(- : :
i
!.i

I .
ll r
-t l L5 l d
b. '
l 3 l
" : i i
i l
i i-to
- . i
, , , _u
- . , il , i i i
-d s a
x ' .. ; ,
i i . i i. ,
i ,
: i i
i _
d
-1% DAFPIN0 q{
fc [ '.' l
7 -2% D.w

PI?,,G l : ;
5 33
~; , j
I '
I
~
3 I / -5% DAIIPING :,
) *,
i . /
/..
__ , 'i f 10% DAIIPII.'G i! ;
3 .{
* /
d . l
! NEW 2% DAMPT'lG! I 1 6.
f ,3
_ /. / N
__/
/,
r
/
l d
3 g f. .
l '
f
/ i ; /' M f. -
i l, s
' i E --
1 d : -
/ / i i i.
l;
- i I d
~ ^. .
',.' / / s n
\
I ~2
/: ;
j ~ li i ! i 8
2,
'j i ! ,
/ , .
I i. '
-1 ,
!c M' ! s 3 6 H N'!q 47 s M.l i '
fI I !
ik \ \ ,
l f,
,,, I,,.,i,l,!, ,! ! ! , . ,, ....l . , ,,l ,..! , \ . \ '\. , . I .\ :Y 13
.3 4 5 .4 .8 L0 LS
'a l
)
53
.4 .O .D4 .C5 .t. .1 .L5 .2 tetkt Sec.
Fyi 13 VERPICAI, P.ESPCilSF. SPECTRA DI'3IG;! 1%315 2/J'T',:C'UAKE L-3 O .. , . . . . . , . ,. m ,,,
O
CLIENT DETROI':' EDISON APPDmiX 3 si ;
SL-3147 n r a. r PROJECTE::RICO FER'II
'- hitb-{Kl.jIJt.Jp [ j s n2'*Y .
Rev. 1, 11 '3-76 DESIGN BY Ct.M y
I'd . (. . QNGIN:ICR!3 -
CHECKED BYSGM
l. ' .
tiv. w o. ,
I i l i 1 -
ou y..s a ; i i ..
3 '
_tw Ts u ,l< x.5 l l l l a
r -
temem. us J
10 .11 f.0 LO J 31 23 to -
.y. ... .
6,l,..i.
_ z-
...l. .
\
i
- l- .l , .
I a
-. .------ ; -- - i a ;5 :
.o -r - i , 6 r
I l
1 . J
' ' -4 l ! l l l
' l ,
' u 3 seg i r, ' _
,r . i i ! ,.
, ) (.
- _i .
', i . i i i
p
i i
) { i j .
-o t 3
_ _ _ . -r .
t -! .
',- i l l l l ! { l! --
3.0 .
1 ' - ! l l l l l l ll 1.
,3 '
i
" - 6 l1fiDAI~ PING
! [
~
. I . 272 DAMPII:G ! 3 ,".
" J
. 5% DAMPING i ,
1 )i ,105 DAMPING ; j
'J MED 2% DA'4 PING i g
, g
[ ' I/.
U -
l l l l ! ! 3
s )
-e o i .
j .- ,
.,- , i . .
3 1 I . l l '
' l 'I ' I d --..
r:'
y '8
, f j
/ /
.f . -\ g ; !
i s.1 -
' /. /i/'
, __.L._
, ~~\\\.
T \\
. ...: . - ,i '
'k / i//
1P g ,
/ // / \.\u - : i .i b
7
/ N / .
4 \ \\ ! ! i i .! -14 x \ \\. iI
~
,d 4
s::
, / // /! /-~ i !
i i
i
I i
f!
' i l 'ij i ;1 it .
.r .
i w 3 / j !
l j l. _
/ I i .
. ! . k l !
5 I ! !
W i -
.\ \ . :
j i l '
' l
)
! l' s . _
., N c_. __.' i N X ___N e
.. .2
- ; N . A _ \ 1_ _. ' - .;
A \ \ _\
' ' . . i u
I ii i ! ! !
_\ '\ \ .
C, Im ,3 . , - e', ,,,,!.!, i!.'.l,I...,!....i.,.,l.,..I,I b M\l ~
u =
dU .= .e .u , .n .. .i .,, ., ., .. ., .. .. .,
! .- rua. s.<.
L' - )
VERTICAL RESPONSE ~;PECTRA Ok
.c DESIGN BASIS EARTiiO.UAKE H . H . R . C O M E L F"< . ~~oa n 11 U ..~ " - "
SL4B NO. 13, Ei *:NATIOM: 5908-0"
CLIENT ' OE'" POTT ' EnTr?"T APPENDIX 3 p.~ ._
SL-3147 d dpnn-n - ep a -
PROJECT r"n Tco ::o rT DitiCiC)tGfgJ:tJy1/ ossion 3y csx a . 1. 11 a
> SNGIN CIM AG -
CHECKED BY SGM
%. ' 'f ' E t V. N O. i l I
DAff J s s' 74 l lHITIALS < d.1 I I ! l ,
. frequency, CP$
13 FID LO 5 1s 10 10 10 30
' ' ' ' ' I '- -
ne_ >' ' -
~
'I'i'''j'!
ll I !-
- i 'hij'
~
l .
-j
--- -- 6 2:
. . , a, ,
iu _
e , , ! -
. l .
l i :
i p i .
mo _ . .
- 4 ! i ,.
u . ,
I;
~
j a i : 1i -
~~
T ,' l l l i.lIl ,
f.
4,0
- i i
i i I i illi !
ll j'! l 3'-
~
i i I 1 I 2
i l l : -
a I i .
~~
" 191 DAMPI!!G ; -
\
~
i l 1-
2% DAMPI?!G !
I' l
\
[l Y -55 DAMPI?G .
'l
k [ 10% DAhPI!!G !
S u
(('
I >mw ? = min > rvm
! / / d: i I
i [ 3, 4..
y
.,,/ .. ,
r . 3 p ..
1 I
t .
/ .
. gy
\ \
\_ . . ' .- - ,'
_ j/ . f x x x- . . .
't - i / \' 1\ \ '
! ! i ! ,t 1 { , -
/~ l
/i \ \\ \ i i i i i1 -l{
j ~-c ll - /- ? x\\ \ ! i :
l " ,i u . , . , ,. , =
a q -
ll
. . x r .3 ,
5
. i, -
1 1 -
/ i *
.I I i 2 g
! : l . _
j D ; ; !
i
\.- ,
'!.I i l ,-
. i s i
.n . i !
g ;
. N. ,
l L - t .i . !
+
4..
n ..
, x ws x -
b ,! i - - ' t i\ \\ _ \ ,,
1. i i; i i i i N ~x \ -
S - :
t i l I \ ._
\ .
,3
,3 i . i It u;!_. , , . ,l. . I , . . , ! . . . .'! . , , i ! ,1.ul !\'\, 1 I
\ ';,
.le, .a .c .a .cs .c. .m .i .ts .2 .s 4 5 .a .: to u u
% ,,,x s.
<s, -
VEFCICAL RESP 0i!SE SPECTRA
DESIGN ~EASIS EART.;!OUAKE
.R.H.R.
COMPLr.X q . SIA o sw. .t u , not.v.urION: 5908-O " 11.7 D3 'JS
r. in L2 ,
l
\ <* *. .
=---n- ..,
_h FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40
< SARGEDT&l.UCDY h EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File # f g%7[7 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: RHR C00Llm TU..ER E1156B001A E1156B002A SPEC. NO.:
EQUIPMENT NO. : 3071-93 E1156B001B E1156B002D LOCATION: RHR Complex (Top of Cooling Tower - Elev. 637'6")
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: O ACTIVE PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1. S&L Fermi-2 Drawings: M-6 Rev. C Dated 1-11-80 M-7 Rec. E Dated 3-13-81 M-8 Rev. B Dated 7-12-78 t
M-9 Rev. B Dated 7-12-78 M-10 Rev. D Dated 8-22-78 M-11 Rev. C Dated 3-13-81 i
2. IMD File #011785, Enrico Fermi Atomic Pc,ser Plant, Unit #2, Residual Heat Removal Service Water System Cooling Tower Component Design Crit.eria and Derign Calculations, Dated February 8, 1974 by the Marley Co.
3. Westinghouse Drawing No. KC-67605, Sh. 1, Dated 3/4/73; Sh. 2, Dated 2/12/74.
4. Marley Company Drawings Nos: SD 72-4361 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 SD 72-4362 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 SD 72-4363 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 73-41173 Dated 4/18/73 74-452 Rev. A Dated 7/17/74 74-453 Rev. A Dated 5/17/74 74-455 Rev. A Dated 5/17/74 74-4843 Dated 2/11/74 ,
5. S&L Report #2682, Dated 9/27/74.
Prepared by: 86 b* Date: 7 - N ~~ b l Reviewed by: Date:
Approved by: Date:
I l
, g , _ . . , . .
j
! FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SACOEUTEtI.UCDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File # f Page 2 of 6
$9$7 7 ) QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
l l
=
J QUALIFICATI0fl
SUMMARY
. LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
1. Tornado Loads, dead loads, operating loads.
2. Seismic loads, dead loads, operating loads.
ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
The original qualification of this equipment consisted of the analysis of the various subsystems of the equipment. The subsystems analyzed were: Spray System; Fill System; Eliminators; Fill and Eliminator retainers; Equipment Supports. Natural frequencies and damping values for the ACB Fill Bundle were determined by testing. Natural frequency and damping values for the Belgium Wave Eliminator were determined by testing. All mechanical equipment was assumed to be rigid. Piping and concrete beam supports were analyzed using a response spectrum i dynamic analysis. The motor supports, pipe supports and mist and eliminator retainers were considered in the analysis. In all cases where tornado loade were applicable the tornade loads were much higher than the seismic loads and the tornado loads were used in the ana]ysis.
l -
l I
[
l Y_ I
. -a Project #6139-40 l FERMI UNIT 2
l. SARGEDT&zi Uf)Dy N
1 f p-j EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC f.EMDFile#
aNENaana d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 cmc co g ;
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
. 1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR O
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @
3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NPIE: RHR Cooling Tower
1. Scope: NSSS BOP
2. Model Number: Not Applicable Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Marley Co.
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: Not Applicable
5. Physical Description Appearance: Fan s , motors, niping i contained in a concrete structure
_
aee Dimensions: Approx. 73'6" x 45' Weight: Attachment A
6. Location: Building: RHR Complex Elev.: _637'6" Top gf Cooling Tower
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
Motor - 4 Motor - 3/4" Dia.
[3] Bolting : Number: Pan -3 Size:_Fa n - 1" Dja.
O weldin9: weld TveP:
Leg: Length: Pitch:
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back: Ricid Side to side : 5.86 Hz (Cross-Beam)
Vertical: 9.49 Hz (Cross-Beam)
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
X Laboratory Test O Analysis ., ,
O Other
10. a. System in which located: RHR
b. Functional description: Reautred far removine resianal heat from the service water system.
c. Equipment required for:
Hot Standby x Cold Shutdown @ Post LOCA
~* Concrete structure is part of the RHR complex and not included in this qualificat n.
FERMI UNIT 2' , Project #6139-40 3
SARGEIITklufjDY l EMD File # j l i EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC Page 4 of 6
..: UNGINRER"- I OUALIF1 CAT 10N
SUMMARY
C >d iC AG O
11. Pertinent reference desigt specifications: 3071_93 III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes [ No IV. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test
- O Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis
1. Qualification Report Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit #2 Residual Heat
a.
Title:
Removal Service Water System Cooline Tower Design Criteria
b. h, umber andandDesi Datbn Calculations
EMD File 4011785 Dated 1-16 78
2. Company that prepared report: The Marlev Co.
3. Company that reviewed report: Sarnent & Lundy V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads considered: O Seismic only O nydrodynamic only Seismic and Hydrodynamic
/
Other (Specif y) : Tornado loads.
O Seismic loads
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
A-6, A-7, A-8, A-9., B-8, B- 11 of SL-3147
3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
[X3 Absolute Sum O SRSS Damping Upset (OBE) : Basis for damping: Rec. Guide
4. '
Emerg. (SSE) : 1.61 and Testing
5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
0 ZPA Other (Specify):
l V=
Upset (OBE) : F/Br S/S=
S/S= V=
l Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= _
6. Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered?
Describe loads and how they were treated in overall O Yes qualification program:
1
@ No
Response Spectrum Dynamic Analyses were performed.
~
I
{l t FERMI UNIT 2 j , Project #6139-40 SADGEUT&LUDDV i EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC IEMDFile#
iamoincuac . $ !
csic^oo y QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 t
__ ime VI. IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Test Method: [] Single frequency: _
. [] Multiple frequency:
. 2. Input Mation: [] Single axis Multi axis
3. No. of qualification tests: ,
Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)
4. Frequency range:
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg. (SSE) F/U: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
, [] Bolting: Number: Size t
Welding: Weld type:_
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: [] Yes [] No
[] Not applicable l 9. Test results including modifications made:
l
10. Other tests performed: - -
VIl. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis l UUStatic analysis Static coefficient analysis .,
l X Dynamic analysis: M Responso spectrum Time history
2. Model type:
@C1-dimensional 2-dimensional
[] 3-dimensional
~ . - - . _ _ -mm B -
( l Il" L FERMI UNIT 2 l Project #6139-40 l
SARGEfjT&LUE]DY
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC I EMD File #
icuarnurais. I c-ic^oo ; QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6
m. _ _ _ _ -
3. Method of analysis:
N Computer-aided calculation-programs used:
@ Hand. calculations I
4. Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: x Yes No
5. Stress evaluatien at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress
1. Fill hetainer Bolt Shear Stress 8.22 Ksi 14.40 Ksi
2. Fill Retainer Angle Bending Stress 4.87 Ksi 24.00 Ksi
3. Eliminator Reatiner Bending Stress 19.35 Ksi 24.00 Ksi
4. Eliminator Retainer Bolt Tension 23.10 Ksi 26.60 Ksi
5. Geareducer Anchor Bolt Tension 17.28 Ksi 26.60 Ksi
6. Motor Anchor Bolt Shear .58 Ksi 13.30 Ksi
7. Branch Arm Pipe Support Anchor 7.18 Ksi 13.30 Ksi "0.1t Sheara
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress
1) No Critical Deflections VIII. ADDITIONAL COFDiENTS :
No comments.
-t e
1 l a
. lf FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Y .
ATTACHMENT A WEIGHTS OF COOLING TOWER COMPONENTS
1) #36 Geareducer' 3,150 Lb.
2) 240" Dia. Fan 1,913 Lb.
3) 150 H.P. Motor 2,510 Lb.
4) Drive Shaft 142 Lb.
5) Fill 240,000 Lb. (Wet)
6) Eliminators 39,000 Lb. (Wet) t I
. l
-t t 2
e l
i
' CLIENT D M n tran #N^
i c
PROJECT"='P^'T cn ree'n - -
~
, SL-3147 g r9Ji3 9 "C'. k r parta .] g g C D' ,R?.v. 1, 11-15-76
, DESIGN BY ,
'CNCINenas -
CHECKED BY SGM -
l ! t.
L s t V. N O. ! f ! l
[
D AT : l c.c . 1 l !
INITI Att l< a 5 ( l l I
Fregary. CPS + k 13 2.0 LO 5
f' 20 as 10 ' ' - no
, 50 33 a 6 i * *
=, s ' * *'****+*' +i g i
I
(
8 a a 210 . * **'
'a+', -
~
.. :
1 11 0 '
- ii, ' ~.
tic ~ I -
l .
l l i -
i 1 110 l
t --
i t
t
.I _ _ _ , -
Ido - ' i l I t_.... i i .
i .
l 10 6 .
, g l .I i 10 - j : 1 ;
l j
~
e j l
-'LG LO 5 .
l i I -1 i 5.0 1 I ~
10
~
l .
(3 f i 40 - g
~
s , I 10
' l '
10 ~. !
2.0 j -
20 _ .
i l g 1% DAMPING ~
L5 3 ts
!2% DAMPII:G i I .' !! l I 5 :
l ,f lO@ p DAMPING DAMPING , tc
" Lo , , 1
, t /A7j ,
, , i
- . ; .- .//// i
. I i , -
"{
i i +
,t. X //// , :
i
,t i i i i
- : i - / N / // '
,1-
! ',, - i . ;
i // N 7-// x i l !l
~
[, j l , -
/ . x NI I lll l MHH f
i 1 i li / , R ',
In E
(;
l i
lli N .'
l _. . . ~
5
~
'y
.f j . ,
~.. /--
g ._ .
L.
[/ l l 3 i l -
.ts
r i t l .ts- I t
1 : :
J : *
. .x x \ 3- -M
i , .
10 - {
' ' I ; N N 'k 2 r= ,,-
i l i i
. e NNg g -
i I
i !
l
i '
W;
,- , i I
,.,,l, I.I,I, ,
. , , . I N "ih,
~
,,,,l ,l, , l, ,
.,!,,,,l.,i, ,,,, ,
.3 4 5 .s .: to ts 2.0
.m .e .m .es .i .is .2
.at .as enw. sr Q '
. HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
- DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE A-6
. R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH
U Q COMPONENP SLAB NO. 1 ELEVA' TION

590'-0" ~
CLIEffT UPY@hY Y.mrscw A
' PROJECT ENRTCO ' ?R'4I SAFER & LU.0DY DESIGN BY C L. i ,,R:v. 1, 11-15-76 iUNGINIICRC" CHECKED BY SGM ..
I f l E t Y. NO.
l D AT I IJ *4 7d
' i INITIAL 5 I %. r. 5 l frequerwy. CPS 10 5 1C 13 10 33 20 10
- 50 8 i ' ' * ' ' ' ' ' '- 210 240 _ ' ' ' ' 'a: * *iii***'' l
! I
'~ t 15.0 5' .'
T-- ;
p 150 _ i l, I
l t 'i no
, i ' - -
i- m0 .. ,
- 6-i
, y I _
. , j _
to i
10 _ ; ~
! b ! -
- j.0 to --
-- v --- . - -
{:
u . -l% DAMPING !
~ I 2% DAMPING l! 2 (o a
' DA u 10 i,
// >
i
__f\
~~
1,
[
1, i
i ! ! i ;il W i i i !il 5
t, 3 ' ; ! l i
i
.,/ !. .
't
,i,
-i "
- . '#/ /\_\ \ i e
// / p\\\ l ! I G
U {
i i
e y/ f ' 1_\ N \ - i i ii i i i{?
d'
' I i ,i -
? - . I j/// \\ \\ I i !
-j!
{.!j i
/ -\ N NK 1 i i i t
~
I ! i .
{ ~
! ! i
/l N V X illl [,
g l ,
p ' '
f ,
,D .
.D , , .
i l n : ! ! I ,
y "-
- i i .
i . . i i xw 4u d
' f ! t
' \ \k y g- - i i i f a i ! \\ i 3
! l ! i ; l
- ! a l !
U.
, r , ,, 'ree .r , , ,,,el, i ,
I e i e i,e 1,3
~
n v , ,,,,t , e e e r 3 4 5 .8 LO L5 10
.82 .03 .04 .05 .06 .08 .1 .5 .2 .3 .i ruie, sx.
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA U
DESION BASIS EARTHQUAKE LAB .10. 1,
. b if [JE 7 ELEVATION: 590'-0"
l' CLIENT DETROIT EDISC!' ,
APPENDIX A '
3 PRWECU"uMO M 3t_31g SAslGEOT&LUODY DES!GN BY CE..' .. Rev. 1, 11-15-76
13N:2INUDADb CHECKED BY SGM a .
1 l
Elv. No.
q s o.3(. 74 l O Al t I
INITIALS <M.5l I i Frequency. CPS
' i
'10 5 10 13 2.0 50 )) 20 10
' ' ' ' ' ' T - M0
' ' ii''''' i8 ** -
', 5 *
']
i.
M0. .
g
' I
^
=
15.0 110 ,
e h
l 1 l i i 11 0 n -
Y , ; _
i ; i ,
ltLO _ , ,
~
[ ,, j _
E0 LO
~
' LC-gg m l l
10
- t l' ls ll,
~
10
~
l l l "
-1 DAMPING _
-[7 2 DAMPING l.ll
1, 3 l -5% DAMPING 18 l' _ ! :
y : '
l[10% DAMPING to
' 2.0 b
~ L5
- 15
/, ;
i, 1 ' . :
2 : .
t0 i !/IX/ \\
/ /i :
i i .
u
,s e
m 6 e i -
- t - 1/ , ~ p i \\ ! _'
i u
': i i '
/ l\ \( , i i l i i i i
7 -
i
%, - i ! :
i\\N i i l i i
'~
t i ! / , ( \ NN i i I Iil {
,i j NQ NN I ///, I III i l '~
g i I l f/ i NNNii !
i 5
b / l
]
l '
.2 l'
D i l , i i
'A , ;xx w i-, m i !
. i i ' NN W -
i j e i i
, 3- i i i i t : i i I NN\\ -
y I ]
i I ': g\\ ,
i i !
.ls l,
,,,,l,Ii , , , el. ,,,!.,, ' ,,,, ,,,, , , ', ,,,.I,M, i i ,
3
.2 .) 4 5 .a .: to u to
.or 03 .m .05 .06 .Os .i .ts l ruu su.
l - HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH A-S i
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 2 ELEVATION: 6178-O"
CLIENT D5TRTIT ED13UN APPENDIX A
"" "E "' "**' .St-3147 SimG20]T$ LUPjDY DESIGN BY_ CLM "
R:v. 1, 11-15-76 icNO:NGEAS '
CHECKED E/ SGM -
8 l l
~2 EY. N o.
t, AT E : 8; #d IN4flALS 4 % $ l poency. ces
,10 10 .5 33 2D 30 10 1) r3 . ,
. .g y,,o
. . i... iia e ii. . .i i .
he .. i4 ii, i e i a
~ '
-+ - tio j}* iso _ . . .
t-- -
4- i
- , i l-i
I ,
l -
- I i; e a i
a no i
tao .
ij . .
~
~ ' ' LO Lo - ,
i
. ~ T-~ g 2% DAMPING -
DAMPING i ij
[o 't u
[ M
~
! 5%~ DAMPING I Il u
)
= 10 j
l } l l l i
l ..
, 7 f7 10% DAMPII'G
. o y j l
@ ' I
i / A i i 7, iu UJ to '
i !
W /,
i i I I e t, l i i
, ,. {
1 i
i u
to
!i j =
', - ' i '
/:r \\_\\
/_
M W .
i
' ii i
i i E' :-ii
// \\\\ l i i
[
- i
\h \\ '
$'.3 - ' 4 I .. i l . I
'5-h
]
' ' ; l MANI I ' ! ' , '
4
.s E
If. i\ M --
!! i .3 i
S r.
I ,
I l l !,'.a u .
F : l 1 l L -
u 13 : ,
> > i , l , ,
x x
' ' - h\ j.cs
.Os
} ; l l l 'l i i i ? l iI .
I i 06
, .06 ,l,!.
et, , . , ,,.
~
, , , , ?.,t, . .i,, ,
, a t t ,ee' e e + t t
, ,g
.3 4 5 .6 .8 LO L5 10
.02 .O 04 .05 06 .et .I .15 .2 Feriod. Sec.
0 '
HORIZWTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE g R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST g_9 1 COMPONENT SIAB NO. 2 Final b ELEVATION: 6178-O" P
Appf,391x 3 CLIENT _ t'ro0TT FDT.SOM .
n-3 "
"Ecu mo m SEEHa!.00By DES!GN BY CLM R.v. 1, 11-15-76 i
t CNCINCnt:m -
CHECKED BY SGM I l t l l l R E v. N o. l g I l l DATI lN-8d N l l _l l lH lTI A L 5 'rt x 5l I Frequency, CPS T
1 10 5 10 15 to So 33 20 to
.g.. .
j go
,. m,_ .... ...., . I 1 3, 2
!I ---
ts.o J 15.e _
l l * -
! i i
, ; I -
IM
! j j , ,
140 _ ,
r
. . ! 1- i, t j
, 18
_ i .' i i
i L* - t ;
"* I~ l
i i ,
to --i ; -i ,I l 50 u - i' -
5.0 l
l. I. i. l l e l li
, a, i
. i
j ! :
+
- f
- l .
1.
]
1 i 9 1 !
]
i
'O J 2.0
'i i i :
l
- ! i l L5 u -
i i l -
. i l l
, , i i ,"
L' ,i ,
i
' s i ! l . i d J - . , i i
i ; i i i - '3 {
d 4 d - .
>i i !
'! [
?.
t -
i i i i
J i
-1% DAMPING
" i , l' i l g i
' ' ; 7 -2% DAMPING i ., l) 5 I
/[ -55 DAMPING 1 i l I
) ', e 10fo DAMPING 1 3 3
i
! l l ,
/ >[e l ,
i I
'3 x r/
j ! / .,
[1
I / i
/
!/ !/ -
i :
'd l i
./
-/ l . i l -
- 6
/ x [I '15
/ / :
bl X }
l 1
[l
.m j / '
m .N \\
( i i 4"
.to
, i d'
r ; , i i NN NN i i -l '
- I i i i -
l\A \\ !
[,,,,l,..,I,l, , ,,1,!,,,,,,,.I..., ,,,,1,1 \ M I..< . . . [es a .. a .. u a u
.i a .
Q .e. .
.m .5 . .as Pgfbi, $ec.
. VERTICAL RESPCNSE SPECTRA g_3
' DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, WA LLS AND D- aLAB_EO._1A^. ELO/ATION: 590'-c" 115-on-v" n
i APPENDIX E I CLIENT DE9 0T "' EJISOM
. SL-3147 J PROJECT E ICO FEPMI Rev. 1, 11-15-76 g g.]g '%"] '** g {p] "J g jr a DESIGN BY CI M .
IGNGIN3G AS -
CHECKED BY MM E t Y. N O. !
l f l Daft #0 88 74 l l
" tNITIALS <K.5 I l l
f requency. cps 10 5 10 10 13 10 2 31 20
>aiis iia a in as i a a 8 g<

_ nD
i a M0. < 'ai', i
i'l* !
y' tis i i .
I_
110 La i I -
i l '
- 1 i
! . l ; 10.0 3
. Ito _ ; , , , , --- -
, , i .
-f-- . i i
, 3
_a tc 10 , , g j
, , {
~ j i '
to n -
-t l ---
to .
l l i 10 6 -
~
5.0
' l (O
}] 40 ~
, .t L l 8 l u : I .
10 10 - g _-
[ .
l j
l l l to to _ , , :.
i I ;
L5
~ '
Q L5 t-u
l I I l l t te to , ; ,
p ,
i i i I II - t i i i I i
_ 8 ;-
j i ; i i i 8 i i i L, q - i i i
' I i i 6 ; i l k
j i j , ! #
N - i y 1%' DAMPING
,f {3 ^5 I i ll 2% DAMPING ~
5i 0
!'! ' ' l / --5% DAMPING '4 '5 j
j l
4 j
l g
l g x l
r-l
.x r !
(( .
10% DAMPING i
~!-
l :_, y 4 L_/l ! \ :/ , , '
~'
l i
y i
1_ j a l : }l x
\.T I /h : l l
1 to i i llll , ,
\!- I s x xx , _
.10 c .
x .N NN i i _
~
i . '
NN NN l
- i-i
" - I , i 6 i !
I l\ r\' \ \ !
l ',,- l l t
.,,,I,,,, ,,,,1 ,1, N M .... . . .- ;3 I, , , ,1,,-,,
l ,,,,,,, ,,,, , , ,
.2 .2 4 5 .6 .: to ts to
.0 .03 .a .m .06 .0 .i .ts l e.<% s c.
1 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA
DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX' 118-DB-N B-11 e
WALLS, ELEVATION: 617'-0:
ll
'* - - = , - _ _ _ - m
-t FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 :
L SARGEUTia LUNrTI ! EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC !. EMD File #
g*yf"g- ! QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6
(.', : i l l _ _ _
FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Powell 24", 300 lbs. Motor operated Globe Valve EQUIPMENT NO. : V8-2139, V8-2140 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION: Reactor Building EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: $ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Wm. Powell Co's. Sesimic Analysis Report for a 24", 300 lbs.
globe valve figure 3051 W. E. with a Limitorgue SMB-4-200 Motor Operator, Report No. S-64048, dated November 21, 1973.
O -
t
_m, -
- _ _j g
Prepared by: j/cmcWI~ h- M Date: 7-b"O[
lReviewedby: Date: j fApprovedby: Date: j 1
, __ _ . _ _=--- _ _ - - - - _- ___
_,____.e _
_ _ _ _ , , . _ . . = -
l FERMI UNIT 2 fProject #6139-40 l CTGEi3TFilliNDY : EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC .EMD Filo #
g9; i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 g ,
QUALIFICATI0!l
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS Q0NSIDERED:
Normal + OBE Normal + SSE ORIGINAL Ol'ALIFICATION METHOD:
Hand calculations were performed at critical sections of the valve structure for static loading. Extended structure was assumed as a cantilever beam with concentrated loads at various locations. Maximum bending, moment, and corresponding bending stress was calculated for critical sections. Natural frequency Was calculated based on maximum deflection for an equivalent cantilever beam. Maximum allowable g's were calculated for
( ', each critical section.
O
_J
s . . -
FERMI Uf11T 2 Project #6139-10 )
f 1
, SAGGEfJTs:1.Uiji1Y d EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC [ EMD File # l 5
r
= mNmN3mm* J QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 '
l Cs, cHieroo l ,,
t QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1. I' . ility : Detroit Edison Company PWR O
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @
3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: 24" GLO VALVE
1. Scope: NSSS O BOP 2
2. Model Number: V8-2139, V8-214 0 Quantity:
3. Vendor: Wm. Powell Co.
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: ,,73
5. Physical Description Appearance: T-shape Dimensions: 100 in_ high Weight:7375# -
6. Location: Building: Reactor Elev. : 605 '-11" (21391
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
58.'-E"T2140) ~
O noltins: :2 umber: Size:
Q Welding: Weld Tyep: nytt welm ng-full penetratien _. ~
Leg: Length: Pitch:
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back., n y .,
Side to side : .
Vertical:
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Lahoratory Test
@ Analysis Other
10. a. System in which located:Res.idual IIcat Remova.), normally
(; b. Functional description: open, closes by-pass loop of RIIR llent Ex. to allow shutdown cooling
c. Eq ipment required for:
8 Ilot Standby Q Cold Shutdown Post LOCis
. 1
\ 7
=_ .
j FERMI UtilT 2 i Project #6139-40 i'
~
SARGENTal. UNDY j E Q U I Pt4 E f4 T D Yll A M I C l EMD File #
'DNN N-C *-1 lC AG O R QUALIFICATI0tl SU!'f4ARY !Page4of6 I I f I f "
11. Pertinent reference design specifications:
Deco Snnc? 3071-501 III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: ElYes O No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METEOD: Test C Analysis -
O Combination and Analysis of Test
1. Qualification Report
a.
Title:
sninnic Ann 1vnin p o no r t- for a 24" ?00lbs. Globe aM
b. NumberandEate:sh4049. 11-21-73
2. Company that prepared repor': Midwest Technical Service,Inc.
3. Company that reviewed report: The Ralph M. Parsonn Co.
V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads considered: [3 Seismic only 0 nyorodynamic only O Seismic and nydroaynamic i
Other (Specify) :
O ,
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A
3. Method of com,,bining Requiring Response 'pectra:
Absolute Sum r/A l
SMS
4. Damping Upset (OBE) : Basis for damping: N/a Emerg. (SSE) :
5. Required acceleration in eachAccelerations direction. (if required) from piping :
O ZPA X Other (Specify): analysis at valve location Upset (OBE) : F/B= S/S= V=
Emerg . (SSE) : F/B= S/S= V=_
l 6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
[X] No A
. , ',. ; -j FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l I
>i S~onGENT&!.UUfJY
~' ['
l EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
i 1 cumucane. \ ;
c me^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 l E ___
=
i
___ j VI. IF QUALIFICATION-BY TEST, Ti!EN COMPLETE:
1. Test Method: Single frequency: N/A O Multiple frequency:
2. Input Motion: [] Single axis
[] Multi axis O
3. No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) Emerg.(SSE)
4. Frequency range: ,
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No [] Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting : Number: Size Welding: Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: [] Yes No
[] Not applicable
9. Test results including modifications made:
l 10. Other tests performed:
VII. IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis E] Static analysis
[] Static coef ficient analysis Dynamic analysis: [] Response spectrum
[] Time history
2. Model type:
( ; EDl-dimensional
[32-dimensional
[] 3-dimensional J
t
_ - - = -.rawel
. ** ti FERMI UNIT 2 l Project #6139-40
] [
q SARGEU~f&LUUDY l EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC I
,EMD File # )
i mrmvuzmn +
csic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6
{ _.
3. Method of analysis:
i O computer-aided calculation programs used:
O iland calculations O
4. llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: Yes No N/A
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Element alc Allows Stress Operator / yoke bolting 48.67 g's, Bennet 10.27 g' Bennet / body bolting 248.14 g'qs Body Neck 103.05 g's b 6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) (stresses are limited to Sm.)
4 Element c Allow Stress Stress VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
.a e
_ - = . 4
- ~ l
. FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40
$$UGECI$UR30Y $ EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ,,EMD l'ilc # ,
'["*yfi"j QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UllIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYliAMIC 00ALIFICATI0f1
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Powell 4", 600 lbs. Y-Globe Valve with motor operator EQUIPMENT NO. : V8-2196, V8-2232 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION: Reactor Building EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: @ ACTIVE @ PASSIVE hing d Mter 2196 2232 QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Wm. Powell Co.'s Seismic Analysis Report for a 4" 600 lbs.
Y-globe valve, Figure 16051-Y W.E. with a limitorque SMB-0-40 motor operator, Report No. S-65867, dated 1-25-1974.
(]~
(,) Prepared by:\ OM' -
[d Date: 7//#[/I/
j Reviewed by: Date: g
] Approved by: Date: ;
s :
--___c-_- -- w __- - -: - - - - -
-4
- .n.
1 0
. e d 3
- E FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 h SARGErlT&l. UNDY I EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ,EMD File # l
$$$27g- QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 $
{ ,
l QUALIFICAT10tl
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Normal + OBE Normal + SSE ORIGINAL QUAL l"1 CATION METHOD:
Hand calculations were performed at critical sections of the valve structure for static loading. Extended structure was assumed as a cantilever beam with concentrated loads at various locations. Maximum bending moment and corresponding bending stress was calculated for critical sections. Natural frequency was calculated based on max. deflection for a equivalent cantilever beam. Maximum allowable g's were calculated for each critical section.
G,,
6 t
= a -- - .
~
l FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 g C S O O C . D C .j D l' EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC .EMD File # f ry invencano I QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Pcge 3 of 6 L C. WC AC.O
_ -n QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF E'0UIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR C
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR [X]
3. A/E: Detroit Edis m/Sarger.t & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: 4" Y-Globe Valve
1. Scope: C NSSS [X] BOP
2. Model Number: V8-2196, V8-2232 Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: ym. Powell Co.
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description Appearance: Y-shape O 36" high Weight: 593 lbs.
Dimensions:
6. Location: Building: Reactor
Elev. 555'6" (2196)
& 575'0" (2232)
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
C Bolting: Number: Size:
QQWelding: Weld Tyep: Butt welding - full penetration Leg: Length: Pitch:
0
8. Natural frequencies in cach direction:
Front to back: 22 Hz Side to side :
Vertical: .
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test
@ Analysis O Other
10. a. System in which located : RCIC-2232 HDCS-2196. Normally l
b. Functional description: clo s e:3 . Used for test of RCIC System / Norma 11y closed _topens m i n i mum _f_ low __byg pa S s. lino [
c. Equipment required for: I
@ ) iQj t, g gjd b y [] Cold Shutdown [3 gog LOCA
( FEht41 UNIT 2 [ Project #61b9-40 SARGENT&l.UijDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC lEMDFile# l I isNOWERR* -
QUALI F I C ATi t.:'
SUMMARY
2.Page 4 of 6 E k
C H sC AG O i
&6
11. Pertineni reference design specifications:
DECO Spec 3071-501 ,
III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: f_] Yes C No IV. EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION METHOD: Test
@ Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis
1. Otalification Report
a. Title : Seismic Analysis Report for a 4", 600 lbs. Y-globe valve
b. Number and Date: S-65867, dated 1-25-74
2. Cc.,mpeny that prepared report:_ Midwest'iechnical Service Inc.
3. Company that reviewed report. The Ralph M. Parsons Co.
V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads considered: [X] Seismic only 0 Hydrodynanic only
. O Seismic and nydrodynamic Other (Specify):
2. Required response spectra (uttach the graphs):
N/A
3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra: .
Absolute Sum N/A SRSS
4. Damping Upset (OBE) : Basis for damping: N/A Emerg. ( .sE) :
5. Required acceleration in eachAccelerations direction (i from f requ, ired) :
piping analysa,s O ZPA @ Other (Specify) : at valve locatien Upset (ODE) : F/B= S/S= V=
Emerg . (SSE) : F/B= S/S= V=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
Describe loads and how they were treated in overall O Yes qualification progran-C ,
@ No 1
~ .
FERMI UNIT 2 Proiect #6139-40 S.MiGEUT&LUDDY l EQUIPMENT DYNAM1C EMD File # )
.umua==.;n l csic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 VI. IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, TIIEN COMPLETE: N/A
1. Test Method: [] Single frequency:
Multiple frequency:
2. Input Motion: [] Single axis
[] Multi axis O
3. No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)
4. Frequency range:
5. For multipla frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[] No Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg.(SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
{'; [] Bolting: Number:_ Size Welding: We3d type:_ ,
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: Yes No
[] Not applicable
9. Test results including modifications made:
10. Other tests performed VII. IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, TIIEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis
@9 Static analysis
[] Static coef fimient analysis
[] Dynamic analysis: [] Response spectrum
[] Time history
2. Model type:
b] l-di mensional
[] 2-dimen sional
[] 3-dimensional i
j
- --w,._-- mannemen '
. I
' \
!! 8 FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 i j SARGENT&LUDDY '
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ,EMD File #
1=;4 cin.m sn ., ;
csic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
I Page 6 of 6
_,,, .__ - _a_ _
3. Method of analysis:
O computer-aided calculation programs used:
(X] Hand calculations O ,
4. Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: Yes No N/?$
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Element ac Agow Stress 9s Operator / yoke bolting 38.7 Yoke Arm 9.4 Bonnet / Body Bolting 7.52 Body Neck 14.05 r..
U 6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
(stresses limited to Sm}
Element ac Allow Stres., Stress
)
l VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
i i
. _ - , . . _ . --- . . _ - .2 -
. l
-q FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 f l l
StJiGEijT&LUi]DY I EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD Filo #
l Page 1 of 6 j$Zi"g OUALIFICATIOi!
SUMMARY
FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT
- EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: 20 in. Wafer Sphere Valve EQUIPMENT NO. : V21-2015,2016 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 -
1 VR3-3013,3014,3015,3016 LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: @ ACTIVE O PASSIVE I QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Seismic Qualification of valves covered by Detroit Edison Company Purchase Order No. IE-86782 for the Enrico Fermi Atomic Plant Unit No. 2 and processed under Janesbury Order
! No. NC-46261, NC-34252 and JPB 73111. John Henry Associates Report No. JHA-7634, dated August 31, 1977.
l Prepared by: mem t 6 Ped Date: 7-/ 7 Er/
Reviewed by: Date:
~
Approved by:
Date:
-- --- - - -- A
I, FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGE 01T&LUijDY j EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File # ;
I QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6
'E$$$(($[*- l OUALIFICATI0tl
SUMMARY
T LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Normal + OBE Normal + SSE i
ORIGI!4AL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Finite Element Method was used for static analysis. upset and emergency load combinations were analyzed separately, Critical Stress for various locations was hand calculated using computer run output. Calculated stresses were found to be within allow-ables.
l l
l D
e 7"'
! FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 r
iaVIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
SAf1GEUT&LU:JDy [
- ENWN&mma a LUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6
( c o-oc ^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT
1. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 T2PE:
1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR l
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR X
3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: 20 in. Wafer-Sphere Valve
1. Scope: [] NSSS @ BOP V21-2015,2016 Quantity:
2. Model Number: VR3-3013,3014,3015,3016 6
3. Vendor: Jamesbury Corporation
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description Appearance:
I Dimensions: Weight:
6. Location: Building: Elev.:
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
[] Bolting : Number: Size:
O weiding: weld Tree:
Leg: Length: Pitch:
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
Side to side :
Vertical:
9. Method of determining natural frequencies:
[] Laboratory Test
[] Analysis
[] Other VR3 - containment purge
10. a. System la which located: V21 - containment
b. Functional description: VR3 - used to purge airspace of torus and isolation /V21: normally closed.Used for con-tainment purge and isolation
c. Equipment required for:
Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdown [] Post LOCA SE2
r .
FERM[ UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File # .
Std3GEbThLUNDY l ;
X
's NWNSWR* -
i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C P-41C A G C l
(
11. Pertinent reference design spccifications:
3071-501 & 3071-12 III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes C No IV. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD: [] Test
[$ Analysis
[] Combination and Analysis of Test
1. Qualification Report
a.
Title:
Seismic Qualification of Jamesbury Valves
b. Number and Date: JHA-76-34, August 31, 1977
~
2. Company that prepared report: John Henry Associates, Inc.
3. Company that reviewed report: Daniel International Corp.
V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads considered: [X] Seismic only
[] Hydrodynamic only
[] Seismic and Hydrodynamic Other (Specify) :
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs): N/A
3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
hi' solute Sum N/A
[] SRSS
4. Damping Upset (OBE): Basis for damping: N/A Emerg. (SSE) :
5. Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
0 ZPA @ Other (Specify) : accelerations from piping analysis at valve location S/S= V=
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= S/S= V=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
[] Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overan gualifi' tion program:
(
C5 No
FERMI UNIT 2 Project (6139-40 SARGENT&LUfjDY l souiesenT nynAnic EMo Pile # I 12NGINR3MS . l c -ic roo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 VI. IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: N/A
1. Test Method: [] Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2. Input Motion: [] Single axis E . Multi axis
3. No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)
4. Frequency range:
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[] No [] Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting : Number:_ Size
[] Welding: Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: Yes [] No
[] Not applicable
9. Test results including modifications made:
10. Other tests performed:
VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis Static analysis Static coefficient analysis Dynamic analysis: Response spectrum Time history
2. Model type:
[] l-dimensional
[] 2-din,ensional 3-dimensional
. I L l l i "
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGEfjT&LUEJDY t EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
'ENGINESMS i c-ic4co g QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6
3. Method of analysis:
[g Computer-aided calculation programs used: Stardyne
[$ Hand calculations
4. Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis: [] Yes No N/A
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stgeps Sgrgss Body Neck Tension 4.271 38 Shear 2.596 22 .80 00 Shaft Tension 25.628 110.00 Shear 26.090 66.00 Bracket Tension 20.591 30.00 Shear 14.044 18.00 Bracket Flange Bolts Tension 52.226 105.00 Shear 40.628 63.00
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) ac Allow Element Stress Stress 1
l l
VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l l
1 l
9
._---_m
1 t
! FERMI UNIT 2 U Project #6139-40
! SARGEfjT&LUijDY l EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
[U '$NOWakR -) QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6
( 1 1 s
t r i FERMI fluCLEAR STATION UtilT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMP"4Y BALAflCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYilAMIC QUALIFiCATI0fl
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Testable Swing Check Valve 20" - 900 lb.
EQUIPl'ENT NO. : V12-2001,2,3,4 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION: Reactor Building, El. 278' 9-1/2" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION: @ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALITICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
DECO File #PI.-738 containing Anamet Laboratories report
(', #373.98 Rev. A dated October 30, 1973 on the stress and seismic analysis of Anchcr Valve Company's 20" Exercisable swing check valve.
l l
Prepared by: Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
Approved by: Date:
2 -l
O 9-CERMI UNIT 2 Project 06139-40 SARGEiJT& LUijDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
. 7jff7 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 QUALIFICATI0tlSUMMAfg LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Norraal + Operating Bases Earthquake Normal + Design Basis Earthquake ,
ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Valve was analyzed to the requirements of ASME-B&PV Code Section III, 1971 with Winter 1971 Addenda.
pressure retaining parts are qualified for class 1 valve design requirements of NB-3500. Non-pressure retaining components have been qualified to the criteria established in NB-3200. The connection between valve body and bonnet is evaluated by using Anamet's computer program BILAPSS.
1 i
! FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 B
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
SARGEUT&LUDDY ll
'ENCINESNe d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 esic co a
{- t .
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I. PLANT NAME: FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1. Utility: Detroit Edison Company PWR _
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @ ,
3. A/E: Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: Anchor 20" Swing Check V12-2001 V12-2003 V12-2002 V12-2004
1. Scope: NSSS @ BOP
2. Model Number: 20"-900# Exercisable Swing Check Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Anchor Valve Co.
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description Appearance: Check valve Dimensions: 20" Weight:
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bldg. Elev.: 278'9h" 7 Field Mounting Conditions:
O Bolting: Number: Size:
K Welding: Weld Type:_ Butt weldinct to nipe Leg: Length: Pitch:
8. Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back: Rigid 1 Rigid b assumed Side to side :
Vertical: Rigid s
9. Method of determining natural frequencies: N/A Laboratory Test O Analysis Other
10. a. System in which located: Feedwater
b. Functional description: provide isolation of Reactor
c. Equipment required for:
M Hot Standby 3 Cold Shutdown { Post LOCA
7 FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 SARGENT&l. UNDY i ' EQUIPMENT DYNAMlC EMD File #
'mmaann
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C M8C AGO f y .
.11. Pertinent reference design specifications:
III. IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes C No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: Test
~
@ Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis
1. Qualification Report
a.
Title:
Design of 20" 900 lb. Exercisable swing check valve
b. Number and Date: 373-98 Rev. A, October 30, 1973
2. Company that prepared report: Ananet Laboratories, Inc.
3. Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.
V. VIBRATION INPUT:
1. Loads cor.sidered: [XJ Seismic only O Hydrodynamic only O Seismic and Hydrodynamic
~
O Other (Specify):
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
3. Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra: N/A O Absolute Sum O SRSs
4. Damping Upset (OBE) : N/A Basis for damping:
Emerg. (SFL)
5. Required acceleration in each dirtction (if required):
ZPA X OtherResultant (Scecifv : max. In any uirectionfrom.pipino analysis
$.)83 Upse (OBE) : F/B= S/S= V= -
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B_- Fesultant b.03 ma&._1n S/6-auf directionV=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
O _
, b No
. n 6
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SAi1GEUT&LUCDY l EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
1NNDINEBMS . i
(, chic ^oo OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 VI. IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: N/A
1. Test Method: Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2. Input Motion: [] Single axis _
Multi axis .
3. No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE)
4. Frequency range:
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No [] Yes (attach TRS graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
Emerg. (SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
7. Laboratory mounting:
Number:
{ [] Bolting : Size Welding: Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch
8. Functional operability verified: Yes No
[] Not applicable
9. Test results including modifications made:
, 10. Other tests performed:
/
l l VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
l 1. Type of analysis ' ,
Static analysis l Static coefficient analysis
! [] Dynamic analysis: [] Response spectrum l
Time history
2. Model type:
1-dimensional l [] 2-dimensional G] 3-dimensional I
i
, a 1
FEF.lil UtilT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGEijT&LUDDY fi
'QNGINEERS EQUIFMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
. J g c-ic co g QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6
3. Method of analysis:
@ Computer-aided calculation programs used: BILAPSS (Anamet)
$ iland calculations O -
4. llave equipment supports been adequately considered in -
analysis: O Yes O No
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Element Calc Allow Stress Stress (attached)
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
There are no elements for which deflections are critical Element Calc Allow Stress Stress i
I VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: .
l
.a L'
m ..e s '
. 4s. LACOR ATORIES. INC. SHCET NO. 0F . .
'S CR K f.*L EY, C A ;.l F. . SAN C AT,LOS. C ALIF.
BY.- D AT C CH KO. DY- DATE
sua;CcT _.
H. SU.U.ARY OF STRESS INTINSITIES The following table of stress intensitics denote the - '
stress - intensity limits stated in N3-3200. Valve body .
stress limits are no: provided in this section since the design criteria of N3-3500 are expressed by other linits. i Deviations frc The basic stress limits are covered by the special stress lir s, N3-3227. .- -
' ~
Su=arv of Stress Intensities ( ksi.)
Location Description S 8 8 12 23 31 1
Body to conne uc n:
~
P, - 21.32 + 31.04 9.72 Zone 2 a +Pb+Q+F -
Zone 3 .P -
4.12 + '4' .12 0.0 M.
P. + . 5.62 + 4.12 - 9.74 3 .
P g +.Pb+Q . 8.42 + 17.56 -
9.14 I
1 .
Zone 8+ P M
- 2.93 + 16.70 -
13.77 l
P . + 5.35 + 16.70 -
22.05
. . L ,
Pg+P3+Q -
9.60 + 24.40 -
14.80 Disc .P'M. -
4.40 + 10.02 -
5.62 Normal .
PL+Pb 0.0 + 18.66 - 18.66 I t -
! P M- - 10,.63 + 24.20 -
13.57 l
1 Faulted PL .+ Pb 0.0 + 33.40 -
33.40 Bonne: P
6.49 + 14.20 -
7.71 i
M
.PL.+. P. - 12.56 + 12.56 l 0.0
,i b -- -- .
j Seat Ring- -
Pg . + 9.44 a 14.98 + 5.54
Scat Ring Pg+Pb+Q - 19.26 + 14.10 + 5.16 i
m Weld
r
! o . .m . - r n. n nn. m n, - - ,n : . ,= - w ~~. m m, = :.v , v m--,.xren,w. n ,n-- .-n~.~ -
, FERMI UNIT 2 ij Project #6].w-40
, . , _ . . - , , . ,. }i b o,... ,,. 21 o i f. ?, t! EQUIPMENT DY!!AMIC ,] i:MD rile ,
W OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
d Pace 1 of 6
, c ~ c s.xw ,
9 k.mamm:>m.ee mmn s w un... : awe wa w rrs.aowumwa cr -r-- wury.ae,,=uw u mrmmsnmumner,n.a t
FER"I ilUCLEAR STATICil bi!!T 2 -
DETR0lT EDISDN COMPA!!Y i
BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIP"Ei;T DYi:A.".!C 00AllFICATION SUMi':ARY ,
i "GE2;C igIPn coal: a 'm'Am Pr:!P A';mIEs !
EQUIPMENT NAME: 7(i ump 6a.7,ot or) ,
t i
EQUIPMENT NO, : P./00c001A/In SPEC, NO.: Deco 3071-512 '
3071-85 LOCATION: Reactor I:u11 ding 613'-6" !
EQUIP!iENT CLASSIFICATION: [Tj ACTIVE !
O PASSIVE !
1 QUALIFICATION DCCUMENT REFEREilCES: ,
i
1. Mcdonald :ngineerin!' Ana? ysia Co. Rtport ' o . "1 :- 131, Da t ed 9-2 8-7 3
2. Detroit Edison Draving,:o. 6?1721 2196 Rev. E Founda tion Drm:in;"
3. Detroit i:dison Spec. ::o . 3071-83 Punp Spec.
i
4. Deco Spec. 3071-512 D.C. Spec. ,
r
5. Deco File ::o. 108 l
1 i
l, l
t I
I p .anan -u,wa r.a-a m-s~~. a vmnw__mw.,_ .,mmnn mnu.w,--_...n ~ u P r e p:t r e d l>y : r}JNG
. .i,t hk Date: "l 9, l !
> 1:eviewed by: Da t.e : <
s,e i f ApprOVOd by: Date:
I_._.__,.~~,_,_________,_.u_,~
' p- . _ - _ _ - =. m__=__ _ - _ - - - -
T
!i FERMI UlliT 2 d Project #6139-40 -.
e i J.'$.'dCIO E.S."T! l h' EQUIPMEllT DYtlAMIC {EMDFile # (l' i gf]s QUALIFICATI0fl
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 00ALIFICATIO!! SuffiARY LOAD COMBIriATIot!S CoilSIDERED:
ODE /SSE Seismic Loads i
ORIGlllAL QUALIFICATI0il METHOD:
A rnultidegree of freedom modal analysis war performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-1-I. Type of elements used in analysis were beam.
Seismic Loads were combined with normal operating loads and stresses wre compared with allowables.
REQUALIFICATICII METHOD:
l Ihc new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in original qualification. The additional stresses due to new more j conservative G values will be added to existing actual stresses and
! the results compared with code allowables.
I l
t l
t I
l I
l 0
l
m i FERMI UNIT ! 4 Project f;6139-40 4 l 1 n g
f cw ".'a" 7 I~ pm, 7. . . "_7, u ' r.."J . .si, EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ]h EMD File 4 h g <
12.= i .m U 00ALIFICATI0f! SUMMAF.Y .l Page 3 of 6 b O ,
< = - = - -
_____________.m____.
__L a
_ _, z _ .__
h OUALIFICATIOfi
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMErlT I. PLANT NAME: PERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1. Utility: Detrcit Edison Company PWR C
2. NSSS: General Electric BWR @
3. A/E: Detroit Edicon/Sargent & Lundy II. COMPONENT NAME: EECW PRiP ASSDIBLIES
1. Scope: O NsSS rjj bop
2. Model Number: 8 >: 6x 14$/100 i!P 1750 RP.'l Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: Deming Division of the crane Co./Ceneral Electric Co. -
4. ! the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: N/A __
5. Physical Description Appearance: llorizontal output Q centrifugal i imp horizontally mounted and attached to a motor via.l_im..
Dimensions: 53"(I,) x 40"(W) x 27"(11) Weight:2.25ah coup n
Tota.1
6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Elev.:
7. Field Mounting Conditions:
X Bolting: Number: 4 Size: 3/4" d O weldin9: weld TycP:
Leg: Length: Pitch:
0
8. Natural frcquencies in each direction:
Lateral: 20.12, 33.7 Ilz Vertical: 15.87, 21.51. 25.40._30,90, 32. 25_liz
9. Method of determining natural frequencios:
Lc.horatory Test 8 Analysis 0 0 thor - -
10. a. System in which located: ECO J O u. runctiona1 dcscr1ytion: m =c ~ c , m ..,_ - cs t . . ,
cwpec. r
c. Equipment required for:
@ llot Standby @ Cold Shutdown X Post LOCA d
' m .,,, .,___ =__1. _ ,,o,;,,4 w ,.,,;4 G , W _
,m _ _ ,, _ ,.
FERMI UNIT 2 Project a6139-40 l
t. ,
8SOOE[ibl.UCDY [ EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC ( EMD File # g'
) cuaturen"-f OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
( Page 4 of 6 i
} C H sC AGO g l 0 " -- " =
-J
11. Pertinent reference design specifications: Deco 3071-312, 6 Deco 3071-85 ll l
III. IS EOUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTIO'. IN T!!E PLANT: @ Yes C No IV. EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METi!OD: Test
@ Analysis l 0 Combination and Analysis of Test 4
l
1. Qualificatipn Renort I
Certified Seismic Analysis Report. of Crane-Deming
a.
Title:
llorizontn! Sn11 t Cn_se l'umn"
b. Number and Date: - ME-131 Septecher 28, 1973 4
2. Co:trany that prepared report: Mcdonald fnnineerine Analysis Co.
3. Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.
t 3
V. VIBRATION IUPUT:
I
, 1. Loads considered: [XJ S e i s m i c o n l y C Ilydrodynanic only O Seismic and nyerodynamic l
O Other (Specify):
0
2. Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
SL-3988 Rev. 00 4-18-72 R-8, 32, 7, 31. C-6. 16
3. Method of conbining Requiring Response Spectra:
3 Absolute Sum i
SRSS
4. Damping Upset (OBE) :_l% Basis for damping: Rec. Guide _l.6' Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
5. Required acceleration in each direction fif required):
ComFungd Resu13 ant
! O ZPA @ Other (Specify): [(0.5)'+(1.41) ] '2 = 1.50c Upset (OBE) : F/B= 1.41g S/S= 1.41n V= 0.5" Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= 1.41g S/S=_ l.4in V= 0.5g j 6. Were fatigue effects er other vibration loads considered?
C Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall f qualification program:
O t
(3 No
s t
FERMI UNIT 2 d Project #6139-40 !(
c, n w c.' A Jl pn lj jf l
. s'- :' EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File # ;
1:n= e nnt) I p i c-.caoo d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
r Page 5 of 6 O t
' ,, _. 3 r m awca.aarmra r wens =23.m.,u .._-- -w,=.s--.==.a a_.. _= - - > _ _....s w.J 4
VI. IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: N/A 4
1. Test Method: O Single frequency:
O Multiple frequency:
i
2. Input. Motion: O Single axi:>
O Multi axis c
3. No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) Emerg. (SSE) l 4. Frequency range:
5. For multiple frequency test does TRS enveJap RRS?
O No O Yes (attach TRS' graphs)
6. Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE) F/B: S/S: V:
4 Emerg.(SSE) F/B: S/S: V:
i
7. Laboratory mounting:
O Dolting: Number: Size 0 weldin9: wold type:
Leg angth Pitch, r1 L-
8. Functional operability verified: C Yes No O not applicahie
9. Test results incle. ding modifications made:
10. Other tests performed:
, VII. IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1. Type of analysis Static analysis i @ Static coefficient analysis
C Dynamic analysis: [l Response spectrum
Eigen Values Extracted D Time history
2. Model type:
O o 1-aimensiona:
0 2-dimensional
@ 3-dimensional I
,, I
p _- - _- m.% m--. -- ..rrrrenew :.zr.= m.mx _m_ m_arecc== .
1 iN' . FERMI Uti!T 2 Project #6139--40 ;
, ,g e.--
e .b AJ k 04 g we. g r.pvw a'l 8 t
EQUIPMENT DYNAfilC EMD File # -
c.ix: :: d ,1 g Page 6 of 6 j cs.croo ; QUALIFICATI0il
SUMMARY
- - ,c. m mm - - . ~ m m a_ -
3. Method of analysis:
[x] Computer-aided calculation programs used: ICES STRUDL II O 11ane calculations O
4. Have equipment supports been a-l.equately considtred in analysis: y Yes C No
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Element alc N Allow Stress Stress Stress in Pump Shaft 11,004 17,500 Pump Bearings - Radial. Ioad, lbs Inboard 6?O 1382 Outboard 1,545 6,215 Seismic Stress in Pump Casing Bolts 50 --
i gP ump to Basep1 rte Bolts (Cont'd on next 1%e)
6. Deflection evaluation at critical structura) elements (active equipment only)
Element DBE Calc OBE Allow Stress Stress Deflection of Impeller Shaft .0044" .006" Misalignment of Flexible Coupling .0056 Radians .017 Radiaus l
l 1
VIII. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
DBE stresses and def1cetions are compared with OBE allowables.
.. . ., , ., - , , - - , , , - . . - - - - - - . . . , , . . ~
" - SARGENT & LUNDY CNGlNEERS CHICAGO Page 6a of 6
5. Stress evaluation at critical structural elements: (Cont'd)
DBE Calc OBE Allow Element Stress Stress Pump to Baseplate Bolts Tension 3692 20,000 Shear 1012 10,000 Motor to Baseplate Bolts Tension 1965 20,000 Shear 1689 10,000 Motor Bearings - Radial Load, 1bs 717 10,000 Anchor Bolts Tension 8112 20,000 Shear 2194 10,000 I i 4
, , - r
b 8
p z*
'$MQ CN=OH8 g joa-M E ~ O O '* t Q s0 )c 7.o' N-f.mQ r
0,,?n. "# W **rCo"U4 g *1 4 s-
'. aeyN tC1 c>q - I y,. o E g 3< c-6 .
. g mQ g p<- )g _Cn e 'E i* v2mm4 i iJD2O2nCDa I O>H g .
lI om
\
}
\
e 6 o
8 uu , I l 8
.. u t mu '
' u 5 L
e L . e, 5 '- - t. 1- 0 e
-a
s. .;n :: - : i _:- . ~ - - , , _- : - ;. .
1,
~ _ ~ - } '
- t i
?
t
- s=-
4
%5 u
'I ,t
~ a. a r' - - iu
+ -
s
~ -
- - . l- 6 i e G
N G
N G
N G
l
." --- --- --- s 6 l
- . - I , ' ' +L. -
I I I I
.l
. P 1
P 4
P M
Pi II4 L. 3. r- .t
-- a,.
l
=
s . t N\y A A A A .
i D D D D - -
g g
- . - }l It-
/> % % % - - -
m f 1-2 5 - .-
t o
g lI 3
m m
u -
.~
_~ .
a.
t _
t.
\ . - .
~
G~. . -
.: . e
( - lf ,}-
e .-
n , ,
A p_- _ - : s W
/-I p t. v.
m .
J_ -
-.- . : -e W
. - 1 .
,F. I. .
n. r 6
- i .. . /
m .
. M j;
.

ML20009C144

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY