ML20009C144
| ML20009C144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1981 |
| From: | SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009C140 | List: |
| References | |
| 6139-40, NUDOCS 8107200321 | |
| Download: ML20009C144 (175) | |
Text
'
mm -
m wn-w ama n n3 l
FERMI UNIT 2 4 Project #6139-40
[
- Si9GEfiT&LUilDY li EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
,EMD File #
f
.l
}**g* gg-k OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
! Page 1 of 6 f
l l
t'
,v FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 s
i DETROIT EDISUN COMPANY l
BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPiiENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAM'I: Chilled Water Pump Assemblies (Pump and bbtor on Frame)
EQUIPMENT NO. : T4100C040/74100C041 SPEC. NO.: DECO #3071-68 LOCATION:
Auxiliary Building Elev. 677'6" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE PASSIVE During and After QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
(1) Detroit Edison Spec. 3071-68 with Addendum "A" (2) Detroit Edison Drawing No. 6M721-4007 Rev. E Pdn. Details
([)
(3) DECO File No. B9-649 Pump Motor Outline Drawing (4) DECO File No. B9-646 Pump Assembly Outline Drawing (5) DECO File No. B9-651 " Seismic Stress Analysis of Chilled Water Pumps"; Mcdonald Engineering Analysis Co. Report
- ME-255 9-L-75.
1 l
i t
[emomerau _ - _ _- 1 Mtustrwmsmeasrsemesessemarwar.a.wass ar.nessmarweemanasswwaramuutemem-iremswowserswee:q Prepared by:
h,i k Date: Vl9-V)
! Reviewed by:
Date:
j
! Approved by:
Date:
k I
E 8107200321 810713 e
PDR ADOCK 05000 m
_____,,, a
l
}
I FERMI UNIT 2
! Project #6139-40 I
$$80EEdT$sl.UE50Y k
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC h.EMDFile #
i
. nmw=m QUALIFICATION SUMt1ARY l Page 2 of 6
[
c s ic^oo V
3_
.c QUALIFICATI0tl
SUMMARY
L0t.D COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
OBE/SSE Seismic Loads ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
A multidegree of freedom modal analysis was performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-II Type of elements used in analysis were beam.
Seismic Loads were combined with normal operating seismic loads and stresses were compured with allowables.
(3
.J REQUALIFICATION METHOD The new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in original qualification.
The additional stresses due to new more conservative G values will be added to existing actual stresses and the results were compared with code allowables.
6 I
t l
l
-a
..m..
m
_, -, -, _ _ _ ce,,... -,
,__.,,m._
,J FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40 l
SARGEDTSWNDY f
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC' l
EMD File #
l l!
'mWNCmMS
-1 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
- Page 3 of 6 l
Cm e s ic ac.c g
~
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR X 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
CHILLED WATER PUMP ASSEMBLIES 1.
Scope:
@ BOP 2.
Model Number: 3196 MI'/715 HP J750 RPM on 215T Quantity:
2 m ___e i
3.
Vendor: Goulds Punps Inc./ Westinghouse Motor 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance: Vertical output centri-
{;
fugal pump horizontally nounted and attached to a motor via a coupling _
Dimensions:
3x4-8 Weiejht:225 lbs.
Elev. :puup uuy 6.
Location: Building:
Auxiliary Building 677'6" 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
@ Bolting: Number:
4 Size: 1/2" % A325 O weldin9: weld TYPE:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
0 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
- Per Pef. No. 5 page 8 the two Front to back,: > 33 Hz 1cwest frequenc2es are 39.37 and 77.37 Side to side *: > 33 Hz gdyy for the entire pump / motor y
Vertical *:
> 33 Hz 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
Laboratory Test O Analysis O Other 10.
a.
System in which located: Control center air conditioning b.
Functional description: Provide chilled water to cooling coil to maintain control center te:rparature c.
Equipment required for:
@ Hot Standby E] Cold Shutdown
[f] Post LOCA 1
- - +
l, Project I
j FERMI U41T 2
- 6139-40 2
EMD File #
I SARGEUTkLUNDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC g
l.Page QUAllFICAT10N
SUMMARY
4 of 6
'NNat'na c -c re o 11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
DECO Spec 3071-68 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVliILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test
@ Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
" Seismic Stress Analysis of Chilled Water Pumras" b.
Number and Date: bE-255 Sept. 5, 1975 2.
Company that prepared report: Mcdonald Eng. Anal. Co.
l 3.
Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.
"v.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: [@ Seismic only 0 nyorodynamic only O Seismic and Hydrodynamic O Other (Specif y) :
2.
Pequired response spectra (attach the,g'raphs):
SL-3988 Fev. 00 4-18-72 B-13,14, 37, 38; C-9,19 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
G Absolute Sum SRSS i
4.
Demping Upset (OBE) :
Basis for damping:
p Emerg. (SSE):
2%
Reg. 1.61 5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required) :
@ Other (Specify):
Increased to account for S/S=
futugg, change Upset (OBE) : F/B=
y_e 7,q 1,g Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
3.O S/S=
3.0 V=
2.0 i
6.
Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
IS No i
,s,__.,
(
0 l
3 FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SAROECIMUUUY h
EQUIPMEl4T DYNAMIC
}EMDFile#
mammel.
f m
c -ic ^o o OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
)Page5of6 C
(*
,_. 22hmMNMt MYr. mar
_g;-
._e i
VI.
IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
N/A i
1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
i O Multiple frequency:
]
2.
Input Motion: O Single axis O Multi axis 0 --
l 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
l No Yes (attach TRS graphs)
\\
6.
Input g-level test:
4 Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
l 7.
Laboratory mounting:
4
{,
O Bolting:
Number:
Size Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
O Yes No O Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis l
Static analysis
@ Static coefficient analysis
- O Dynamic analysis:
O ner,onse spect rum O Time history 2.
Model type:
Eigenvalues were extracted l
1-dimensiona]
n> 33 IJz) therefore a static coefftcient analysis was O 2-dimensional sufficient.
@ 3-dimensional i
nn--_m w__2am m.-._,,-mez m m,= m mn>mwa,N 9
Q 4
h FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 h
j 8!BGEUThu UDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC 1:MD File #
icivm :smod i I
b 1
4 c -uc ^o o OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
! Page 6 of 6 a
D,---w&_-enes:srrsmuumurwers exrma.1 1
1 w_
3.
Method of analysis:
@ Computer-aided calculation programs used: ICES-STRUDL-II C IIand calculations O
4.
llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
} Yes No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements: see connents Calc Allow Element Stress Stress (See table attached) 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural ele,?nts (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Impeller Clearance (Deflecti on)
Inches 00376
.025 Flexible Coupling Misalignment, Radians 00460
.017 l
i VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Values extracted from OBE and SSE; OBE allowables were in general bounding.
l l
l i
r
_ _.- e e
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Pump Hold Down Bolts Stress (Shear) PSI 7,204 12,320 (Tensile) PSI 30,048 38,473 Anchor Bolt Stress (Shear) PSI 3,261 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 15,478 20,000 Shaft Stress, PSI 4,348 15,000 Support Frame, PSI 13,386 19,300 Thrust Retainer Bolt Stress, PSI 799 20,000 Pump Frame Bolt Stress (Shear) PSI 5,453 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 5,771 19,275 Frame Adapter Flange Stress, PSI 12,293 42,000 Adapter Flange Bolt Stress, PSI 12,230 21,870 Maximum Nozzle Stress (Suction) PSI 7,502 41,400 Discontinuity (Discharge) PSI 7,758 13,800 Discharge Flange Stress (Max. Disconti-14,537 41,400 nuity)
Succion Flange Stress (Max. Discontinuity) 16,666 41,400 Pump Bearing Loals (Inboard) Lbs, 501 2,930 (Outboard) Lbs.
1,557 4,840 Motor IIold Down Bolts (Shear) PSI 4,617 10,000 (Tensile) PSI 8,522 20,000 Impellar Connector (Shear) PSI 2,045 7,500
('rensile) PSI 495 15,000
\\
l l
CLIENT DETROIT EDISON r
3Ph PROJECT EURICO FERMI joa No WB C
.SAGpoEou*Tu@ l.[uuD1/
oEsimy saa one m u,s., e il2 N GIN CORN CHECKEo BY83 DATE 9 B/ 7f'- SHE ET OF
(.
=
4 1
i E
'I :
- m mm m
m e
n s 8 8
~
5
/
I
/A ~i i
i
/i r/_ lii 1 l l
t/ / / /
il l fl// /
! !I 9l 0
o o
I
////
l El lE E
E ii SN\\
\\
~
//au\\/ !
i t
a a
2
/
O
=
0 a
?
E E
M M
/
i i
1
, j
~y
~
n
~.
g l l '..
.)
=
i l
- j h'
s ig 3
f i
[
s i
4 i
j'
,' i.
i i i i
i I
A
.w.-
l l 1
.l' _
i i
l i
l l
l L,
,t l
1 l
i 1
Ii i
a u
B
\\
1
\\
6
~.ii,
,1,1 i i,,
,,i, i,i
,,,,,,,,,,,2,
,h Q=
a a
a N
Q R 6
? G
~
munsws*==
FIGURE B-13 N...,,
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION-684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5)
REACTOR AUXILIARY BisiLDING NORTH-SOUTH COM PONENT,.
-+e-n
Z Ct. LENT DETROIT EDISON
{
d)bb)Yh {}]f PROJECT F2iPICO Fr'mtT
_ JOB NO39T DESIGN LY SGII DATE b-i l 19 407'
~
iUNGIND2RG CHECKED BYJIS DATE N18/71 StEET _
OF O
s as, c 1,,, e
- 4 I E
I:
3 a
e a 5
N u
.u..
0
,4 l *
2 S _
/
l !
l 7
l-
//
t5 t7.
t t1
_h b
b b
/
a N
N N
r,
~
m a
_ r n
E d
E R
R 1
m e
w n,
~
7
",f y
^
E N M_ct %
l c.
N N
~
s I !
I K hN
\\
l t
- l
,~
I f
h i
~
l I
8 s.
m i
I 3
l, h-4 8
b r
(
~,,,,
,liti t,,,
d..
l i,ir in,
.,1 g
,I m
=
4 4 s Oa s
a r.:vns wwmen, p
FIGURE B-!4
,A i
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPEt TRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAl(E 2LEVATION-634 -5" (SLAB NOf 5)'
4 REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT
l Ct. LENT DETROIT EDTSOM PROJECT QICOFERMI JOB NO 3988-fS_
g f g' } Q W {} ] f DES'GN BY SW, DATE AT'11 18.1St72 iCNGIN50RO CHECKED BY HH5 DATE 4/18/ 72-SHEET ___ 0F U
f
- 2 E
I :
m e m n
e s 8 8 s.
.~
11
_}
- _1:
l..
e.
.j l i
/ / l ij.; '._.i.
///
L l. '., l '
I l
! ///
_1._.
Ii II i
1
///1 I /// l
!: !- '3
/f e
l!
99919 i ll l
/jf,/_/,
l l
F ;: i ' :
- l l
l O T F= l
'~
==
1
. =
7 2 4 ~2 lI
-/
l
/
"i I I'-
2 C RO O
A s
a.,.
1RR h "? "E A
'/
l
_. _ _ ~
O 1
i i \\ c \\ ' f' i.
.i b
k b l!
i i
i i
N L
' f, N.
i I.
i.
~
..t N, i i
I l
l:.
a g
i j--
- d. -- - - : -
2 j
, v3 l ! l l
l t
i i
i
.a l
l I
l i
ll 1,
i i
i 1
I
!I I l _i 1l I
1 I
I l i.
i
.i l
R z
s.
.......n f
l i
l I
j!
.t__a_..
t.
i
....._..a.
i 1
3 j
t m
1 i-
_. L..... * ;;
.u..
l l
l;';
i 1
I 1
1ifI t if f Iff f1 I t t
1 1
9 r
i; a. g r a1,r, t r A111 I I
't E
i 1
1 g
N lr.
2 6
di 6
k d
2 **
3 3
3 3
suuns ww nw l C ricURE B-37 HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAME ELEVATION - 684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5)
- REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH-SOUTH COMPONENT
.MiGEDUm WuDY PROJECT __EGRICO FE.M4I jogyo,j34m_oc DESIGN BY_ AEI DATE April 1B, i9t2 I CN ~~lN GZ Wl -
CHECKED B'r_JH 5~
DATE - $/I % 71 SHE ET __. OF
'C I
E I:
O 3
9,....
.................................'..o t 9 3 a
n p
s a as, l
..; w
.i.
i' I I !. i l
/
ii;i4
//
I
// /V i d.
I
- j. i ' "
l,i..b...k.
V//A i i c e ao Re sv
...!. l'
///A/
~
.w f f f -
~
>A
'$A
// /
l I
'y h
~
<f i. r r:-
[l/
1.C M
//
je !~
l l1 ; e
/
n e m A
/j./ /
/
i r-t i
/. j
[
U '
l
~
i
/
/
I /
' *l9 i
1
/
/
0
(
I l;
' - 1 M; e g-g i
-- \\
'l 4
r l
_'3
-. f 49,,
N
[.:
l 1
N N-l s
l
!: ' ! I [c.
p P%
1 NN d
li i s s
\\A a
I I -
L,._, '
iI i _.
. 1 1. r._4.. ! -
l {
L !
l
- 11
- j i
i i
i
_.4,.
.-i..,a l
l l
i e
i 2
.! -4 l
l l
1 i
i i
}.
S..
4s
~
l
. j
....i i
i i:
q s.
i i'
i 1
L... +...,. i.,., _. ; a I
R ~
.+;.'
- )
d 5..
- 1 *.
1 ;;,
a l
.i!j 4
l'!
,t 1i i t it t R f
I f
f ff f l 1[] )
l l l l jgjg l l g y j
t j
j g
t g;fg i F f f f EtIt k
h h
9 9 *-
U 9
$ 8 8 6 t i 1 1 m,
nun s wwmew FIGURE B--38 i
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA C
oesic" s^ sis e^RTHOUAl'.E ELEVATION - 684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5) l t
REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT i
b o
mu6
1 A
l C1. LENT DFTROIT EDISOM
- &gppiBV PROJECT E!RICO FERMI JOBtt0309A S&ea d-a i
-u DESIGN BY SGil DATE ADril 18-107?
IGNOINCCRG CHECKED BY ES DATE Wl4 71 SHEET _ OF 1
p r
,i E
E :
3 m mm m e
m e
a a 8 5 n..
.1 1
.1 u.
4a
)
1 :, 11,-
i l;;i l1, 1
?
)
e
- j.. [_
3 i
I
. i.;..
I l
l i
l L,i l
-- H '.'-lI..
sI!
6
,j i
g
.._.. l".
i
.g f:7.._. g -
I
/ii
,a
. p 1
O
'r = m n 7 7Mr 3
O m. e 1
(
l3 l
j i
i*
M' J, i
~
e W-
~
n' i -
?.
. re:r m a i
v.mw, l
l I.
,..._.-4,
'l
_... 4 I
h.
l pI n
N 1
- . j. *..
j
{
l l
l-*
i c
.y-:
1 r-T:
1'
- A iT i
l
.._ li j
i i
I i
i
- v
._4
...+,......,s i
I iI
{ l 1
e I.,
!I l
ia i.
l
-t
......,3 i
I
!t l
i p.,
.....a i
i..
1 3
I
.['.
m 4 ::
i 4
8 i
i g
9' i!,,.ii.
i:iir'i1 t.
g au.tr'a.1 i
i ii iniini ini r
- rei, in ii
.i it r
.i1
~ m
" m m n
m q s a
6' E
B B:
0 m., a ww
..m FIGURE C-9 G
VERTICAL Ri SPONSE SPECTRA
^
d OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE AUXILIARY BUILDING SLAB EL. 643'-6" 5 677'-6" v i;4
w o
CLIENT DETROIT EDISO![ CO.
t '.
PR JECT
'r2IRICO FFFiT Jos No._3, gag
([..SEiMUT&L8Jn"ml DESIGN SY SG. t DATE A"ri l 9-
- 07?
4 iCNGINDCTIC -
CHECKED BY H3 DATE 4,IlO / 72,'5HE ET ___ OF _
H
?
' t, l
4
)
d
~t
- 8 8 8 g
a -
- t E
I:
's S
=
9
,,.~
..g,jg.,
8 4
t.
,I g
I-~];'
(
I r
i 4 I:
k *l ?
i i
l; I i l
'O c
., p lt, -l
..[
._ i
..p....
i i:....
f i
j W
i I
l l
iiI.! 1-l s..
l,:,;i**4 j
i 3
j
- c. j i t
.1,.,-....
j i
l 7
I QQQQ
?y 1 u. l..~
a g
m~-
J O'
s THW x
u g* r.=
/
- Q
/i Q
mem^
t i i
j j /.
//
f
}
l i
p VlRW'8" s
(
\\Y
/
.... :.... c
- w t' y in
[;
I t- -
t Is l
L
\\.
\\'
./
l
-j
\\
p-J i
, i l g( t j
i p -t
\\\\- \\
i
.!....._, j I
i t #X i a
ii
.\\ i i
i
?
i.
J; a
[
!I t t ',
i
?-
i :
I i
~
i i I l l I
l t'-I ts k
m
. w I
'l I I
! 'NN NN I I !
5
_g
]
i
~ !i DN!
I I... l ju
.$, s i
j
)
i l
~
I u.
r.
3 n
6 l
i 4
l f
4 tiit i it t
,iiie iiit r
i 1
e r
t
?,?
1 ii+
iit 1-
- t g.
k 3
Q3 3 % 3 0
3 C
2 6
4 6
- ti ia t ' in i.iii i
i 3
sons ww,. inn h
g>
5 k
FIGURE C-19
'I h
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA
~
N DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE AUXILIARY BUILDING SLAD EL. 643'-6" 5 677'-6" k
G u
,Q g
_ = _ - -
=-
FERMI UNIT 2 j Project #6139-40 q
S!!RGEUT&UJEmV EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
- 5. EMD File #
3 fPage1of6
'g*19717 f QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
c i
L-H FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIHiENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
E Q U I P M E N T !.*A M E : 10"O Shan-Rod Valve Type Dampers with Bettis Actuators EQUIPMENT NO. :T4100F063A/063B SPEC. NO.:
LOCATION: Reactor Building T.O.D. Elevation 673'-3" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
{@ ACTIVE PASSIVE i
- To fail open.
QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
Ralph M. Parsons Co., Drawing No. 6M721-2849, Rev. L.
2.
Detroit Edison Con.pany File No. B9-781.
s a
3.
DECO Bill of Material No. 89-266M T4100-F-900-CA-005.
4.
DECO File No. B9-ll19.
t
__..-_--m=--------__a-__-,=u==-.mm_.,_.m--W
, u_ _.
Prepared by:
)A.
u,k Date: 7 Cl Reviewed by:
Date:
e Approved by:
Date:
l' y,grggggggy. -
g_ _
m _ __, g m m 3g h. - - - -- -e p-w
_7% 7 a_- a s M
I i
l FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 I
J SARGEUT6!.UDDV I.
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
<.EMD File #
h t
'5"9EdL"g-OllALIFICATIOEl
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 QUALIFICATI0tl
SUMMARY
i LOAD COMBINATIC!1S CONSIDERED:
OBE/SSE Scismic Loads ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Static Coefficient Method qualified to Sg Horz. (both) 3g Vert.
REQUALIFICATION METHOD _:
Show that the new seismic levels are below the levels c;.ginally used.
1 I
i
(
l.
1 f,
s FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 8A536EI.IiOl.UEjUV h
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
('/
' NWNamn QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 c s ec roo w
o QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
10"0 ISO. Valve / Dampers with Actuators 1.
Scope:
Model Number : Type 4340 (Dampers)/CB525-SF.(Act.) Quantity :
2 3.
Vendor: Shan-Rod Inc. (DarSorn)/Bettin (Actunenrn) 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the Cnvices included: N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance: Isolation Damner
,)
Mounted in a circular duct with actuator mounted in a cantilever fnnhinn zu/ nis. va lve Dimensions :15"0x6" (long)/5-3/4"0x 28"(ll)x20"(LMeight : 70 1hn-ric tuate 6.
Location: Building: Reactor Building Elev.: 673'-3" 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
Size: 5/8"0 Q Bolting: Number:
g 0 woldin9: weld Trep:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
Not Calculated.
Side to side :
Not Calculated Vertical:
Not Calculated 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies: N/A O Laboratory Test O Analysis O Other 10.
a.
System in which located:
co m oi c'r nter_ Air __Cond (g
b.
Functional description: Normal Open-must close is event 4H1 of k O C A._ip-permit _.prcmitizing onntrol center Equi nent required for:
min. makeup air b
c.
Hot Standby C c'o]d Shutdown O Post LOCA
_]
a
1
{
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l SARGENTM.UUDY j EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
' EMD File #
j
- 0CINCOMO 0
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
i.Page 4 of 6 l
C J
c.-oc ^o o i
j
=
11.
Portinent reference design specifications:
III.
Is EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test
@ Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis i
1.
Quali fication Report "Scismic Analysis of Shan-Rod Inc. Type 4340 Heav',
a.
Title : Duty Butterfiv Damners" b.
Number and Date : DECO File No. B9-1119, 8-19-77, Rev. 10-24-77 2.
Company that prepared report : Shan-Rod Inc.
3.
Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: Q Seismic only C Hydrodynamic onty Seismic and Hydrodynamic C Other (Specify) :
2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
SL-3988 Rev. 00, 4-18-72, B-11,12,13,14.35.36.37.38: c-5. 7.15.17 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
2 Absolute Sum SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : 1%
Basis for damping: Rec. Guide 1.f.il Emerg. (SSE): _2 %
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
@ Other f.Specif y) : Per Ref. No. 3 Upset (OBE): F/B=
5g S/S=
sc V=
3-Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
sn S/S=
Sc V=
h.
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
b
@ No
7 l
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40
) SARGE!JT&LURDY EQUIPMENT u/NAMIC EMD File #
4 1am2:Necm:r
. i j
c H ie roo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 C
VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, TilEN COMPLETE: N/A 1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis O Multi axis O
3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[] No
[] Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-le"el test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
IlBolting:
Number:
Size Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 0
S.
Functional operability verified:
Yes
[] No
[] Not applicable l
9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis
[] Static analysis 50 Static coefficient analysis
[] Dynamic analysis:
[] Response spectrum O Time history i
2.
Model type:
l (j
[] l-dimensional
[] 2-dimensiona l
@] 3-dimensional
__J
.~
_=
[.
_D
_,asenemmemmememassesemiscrease.anmune.m l
b h
i 4
FERMI UNIT 2
. ' lj SARGEMT&!.UDDY Project #6139-40
's EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
.nMD File #
j inrem us m a.
l QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6
' k 4;--
E 1
e s.c ^c.c,
_ _ _ -__ _ m(i 3.
Method of analysis:
O computcr-aided calculation programs used:
@ IIand calculations O
4.
IIave equipn.ent supports been adequately considered in analysis:
@ Yes No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow riement Stress Stress l
AnchorBoltsStressIntensity(PSI 5 15,530 85,000 Actuator Plate Weld Stress Intensity (PEI) 2,940 20,000 i
Flange Bolts Stress Intensity (PSI) 4,219 85,000 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Disc. Deflection (in) 0.000462 0.05 4
VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
None b/
_-_,,,_.m...,
l CLIENT ETWXTTEl@28 PROJECT EliP ICO F.'-PI Joe No %PR SAilGEjT&l.00DY DE51G4 BY oG" DATE Anr13 10. 197?
CPJ2tNuZpitt
_1 CHECKED BY _hh3 DATE d'E ~; SHEET
_ OF C,-
?
r
- 9
- f C
2 8 8 (
,,4 k
53 3. "l
.4 a
, ;,o i,
i..g....l.
.l
~
,--+).. O
)
..,. _. t.
/.,
i j/./ '.-
1
., ~
I
..., _l.,
i ;, ?
i,.
I i
15 l2 O
15 !
lt.
7; ~ r
- l ;,.
- J...' I..
g 7_.
l&
le lh I
i i
/ I f
1 1'
I l!
i<
R ii 1
I O
IQ
-4....-.,.s',. I g
Q
!Q l'i e
s
.m I
l l
'3 N
R
'eQ l 1..
m e
a n
,~
1 i
. l T~~ ' [ **
T i.
. ' i,.
I
. i l
i t.
Q G.4 o
+
.. ~,.
e c
...s ig p
.. l i
j...a.....,..
N I
i N
l 1
I i
^
I 4
i i
1 a
t i t
i i
i i
' \\
I I !
l i \\
_..i 4
~
l t l l
l l l l
lI l l
l l 8
'i a,
1 I
,t _.
. 3._....
. j i
j
.-l s
i
[
a
.. u f
- i l e
i
- . _.1
+......,......;x 1
I
-5
.1 l
l l
l..
9 p..
l
}
g l
i In o 1
.1
,1..,
I,,,
-n i i. : 1 ri
.1.,i iiii
- nii, i
i ii 1
+
.ii.
se "i>
in ii i
i i -
2 b
.5 l=
.e
.,e 4
.s 5
fE 3a suun s ww.mv FIGURE B-11 f3 k'
HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE ZLEVATION - 659'-0" (SLAB NO. 4)
REACTOR AUXILIARY DUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT i
em3JoHa d, go,-
(
9 zH L-EoMna maWHaO mtag,
'0 ZO, o D. U-'
gyOOl, l@ _ ~C "1<
C i
Ew y m<.
%2 0pam Y a a. 2 0,j a
t t-62O2ag3a>
9mQmo *g U3o 0y4m h y'3' pmm l
O" s
c S
.~
e 3.:
- '_'_. a a.
3 t.
n s
- s e o o
u o
n m
a s
t 4
u t
t o.
0 n
t 0
1 i
t t
\\
\\
g gY
\\
3 L
A t
\\N\\
l,-
k\\
\\
q\\
e I
J I
G G
G G
o P
P P
\\
1 I
J I
- I P
6 l
l t
l Al A
A l
I D
D D
D
\\\\
1 A
s 4
\\_
1 2
5 u
_A-3 3 _
%t g
l9 6L 2
/i_
I o
s.
r m
i x.
t n
1 ee c.
t 1
'l.
P
.;j w
/,.
~ _,
4
'm
_L. m.i
~
h l
t a
4 3
n A,
s J.
b -
- ~
~
?
. ~ ~
n.__:
o 1
n
" 3 D.
e uo u
1 t
4 3
s
.o o
0 u
a u
m s
t t
n'.g !,j
--)
9-{ h ai_w (q
I0m ozdI'r0Ox mmmTOzmm m A0 c>m
- mb1IOC>Xm mrq'<>i5z.,cb-r>a zO. 5 o
OAm>;zc) g>O;O%>C :i-
< gc rO_2O zOmq.,TmO d. O Ozmzi-
CLIENT DiW GIT EDDLb q
r)
PROJECT 1:!!P.ICO Fi:ii41 JOB NO.$'f n-M --
ugs a g((g gPgy n
DESIGN BY JUU DATE __urril 'i' - 1./C CNQiNGGR5 CHECKED BY__J4 H 5 DATE 4/l ? / TP-SHEET ___ OF
.g
. a
- i
's
=
=
= s as.
...(
,~
l
,~
_ + -
p' l
-.(.
.t _-l
):
=.__
..L.....;
t-1I l l
I l
I 2_
i._..L..! I*'
J 1 L. l;.
0 J
2--
l V #,
l l
9 ;l Al
-l l
/ /
_.l
.!. I.
l
-m 7,.
-.m
_L,~
/f 8
1
..f 7
![__I 4
a,,
4
,/
i, c
l ll s
N
.n
/
s
/,j. ;, /
l 1.u. --
s f
e e
s N,i \\.l l
_.. ~ !
c
- i. s y
N i j
S u
e c
I.\\,
l.
i i
.'...y.*.,.
l
-....a..
1
~
l
' A.
i i
s I
i l?
N g
....J.'
! -j N
8 l
h
.L_.
. 1 4 _.
_. _. 1 1..._ 3... -
g ii l ! !
l l
4
........A l
l l
l l
.l
,I f\\-l
.... =
l l
ll l l
l
..,i._..i 3..... _._-.. -. 4 i
I i i
l
. l.
.3 m
l
...,.'x-t
__.. L J..
I 1
i l
I
.1
)
j i
4 n
s..
_t i
i i
I8
.t.
i i!,t
, l,,,
i,,,-
,.,1
,it,:, '..
o,.
,i,.
i 3E U
0 9
N 9
L: 8 d 0 c.ivris ww+nn g
FIGURE D-35 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
,DCSIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-0" (SLAB NO. 4)
REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COM PONENT
~
4 CLIENT DETROIT EDIS0ll PROJECT M1CO FERIII jos no 398"-CO-SADGEDT& LUP"DY DESIGN BY-SWI DATE ATil
,8-1972 1
2:NGINGLRcL CHECKED BY
_HH S DATC _4/18/ 71 SHEET _ 0F U
- E E
E:
2 m,
e n
e e a as.
.~
3 1 j'
,u..
11,
1 ys i
j l
//
i l '].!' !. '..._
i t
i
//f..i_..
4,.
/
L.
j t :
i i
l
.I i I.. i.
I I
I
///
._.i...
/
3 I /// l
!....!_.!..i
!Ii 99919 l
.~
!f h
N I
._I_... _.
I l
3 p
= ca c
I i'-
h l
a,.a.,... -
f, l'is,i me.a 'S.
/
a n. - -
w._.
l u
e cw I M
'l 3
il O
i i
i i\\
! x i
.~
\\
K j
.~.
Y
. _I.
I-1 I
X
,:N I
i_
M,i I.
i.
/
\\
I li
'j g
l h,
._. a. -... : -
a i
i l 1 !
l l
l -f i
i i
i
.s 1
iI l
ll i
i i
1 I
II i 1
l L'.-..
._'..--...._.'s a
....__a l
l.
i i
s......._. a.
)
- 3..
~
'......."*z m
.u...
1_
l i
i
,,,i in, i,,,
,1,
,,,,.,,,.l.,
,o,,
et, 3+
w u
a a
m b
& b g
g g
suun a ww.mv FIGURE B-37 HORI2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
, DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5)
- REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT
h CLIENT DETROIT EDISOM 08'\\r3 0 CIl~I b'. I {l Mg'pT PROJECT EMRICO FERI11 JOB NO- % 83 Of
- %8 W ad 8* d DESIGN BY SGM DATE Anri1 18 1972 CHECKED BY
.HHS DATE 4 ' W/ T1 SHE ET ___ OF IGNCINUDRO
., a E
=
,e
~
=
=s.
..j.64
,'i '.'
- _i.
............n..
?
! !1 I
g.-y
! i 3
i s
-r-
+
I
!i i
i i
j;ee lo a
la i
i I
r.i, -
t laa a
.=
i-i a
s i
i a
i.a.
5 !! Is is M/
.I.___ _i_!._...[.. :.
L
..w
/
u' a
a l.
- J ly N
~
A
\\
\\
.\\
.. G _s, g t'
~
L'/
- i S
O I.
j i
i.
i i
\\j\\ ( M E
........... : = :-
_..~ g i.5
'I i
?,
~
E E
l
(
.i i
l
-i i,
!t
.dO.. t.
l I
I I
l I
II L.
l
. ; 2.. _..
l I
l l
lll t i
i t
i-...,....
.,s i !
i l
l 1ll l
l i
I
}_
I
... y
~
f I
l is l
l l
l l
l e
l s..
4.
s 1
t i
i l
l
.. e l
1 4
l l
g a
p _.[
l
~
t c
}l.
e i
i
- - 1 li i
i Il i
1 Iir I
iiii in ii 1 1 i
i iiri 1 1 - r 1r: 1 ri ir i
i i
e i
riniiin,
g 1 1 i
.i_
i.<
E g
g m
9 m 3
~
c.
2 a
4 &
senswn.,nn fs FIGURE D-12 U
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
' OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-0"
~
(SLAD NO. 4) REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT A
CLIENT DETROIT EDISON SARGEDT& L"*"jDY PROJECT ENREO FFD?1T JOBHO.}g88 DESIGN DY SGEI DATE Ap-4 '
14, 19.72
'CNGINDQRG CHECKED BY J.)iS DATE 4/18 '72 SHE ET,_ OF l-O 3
E I:
t
=
a a a 8, a
t
.g.3
_i...
l
~
)
~
3 I
tb t3 e
a
~
4 A
NI A 2
S L
L; - c3
, s z
Q Q
~
~
n 5
d
!lE R
E m,
n,
~
wr e
1 7
/
/
/
~
~
g M -. l N I
y.
N,Wl c.
e.
r-i E
N N 1
N h
- s. NN 1
)
\\ h\\
j i
\\
1 I
l' l
l
! I j
P I i i
1 3,
h
'I a
.a L,
~
3 a
g
_\\
,,,,,,,,,,,,!,i,
=
a s.
4 s
,,,,n e,,
7 g
n g
- 3 :
a a
a wons w e,.,nn s
FIGURE B-14
^
a (,
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA m
OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION-684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5)
REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT 1
CLIENT. DETh0IT EDISOf!
PROJECT HQ:0 'IE D JOBNO-f; L - >
SARGEDT& WDD'I DESIGN CY d"
DATE rd"il 1,. 1972 20Nutritcan~
OlECKED BYJHS DATE 4 / ' ' / 72. SHE ET ___ OF t%V g
j.
~
= s a c.,
4....E E:
s
..,,,,,....,,,,=..,,;.,,,,
E i
,i 3
~
~
O
~
'.l i.
I l'
e..
.}',.t
., f..
/_
l
- ._1 i
i l'
i l
l
- ...i.. ',....i I
l l t k_.'
.w*.I..,8{
I l
VA# ;
.. u] ] !. :
r
^g^ #^
i l
liii
{
lii i
.q 9 l -i n
(
--r-' +- h. *
- 4
,,g 3-f i g
i
.o j l _., *.a....
M ::
5 5
-/ -
l l
i k/l
. l h
I 1
M A
4 1
I p;..'_.'..
A}jh//
N
^
M l
i ji
/,
d l
'.I
, ij-i
.,.~
y i.
g
((
vb s
i-w
._k I
i.... [ 5..
L. l r. 4
~
N-I' f..5 E
~.
N a
I l
B s
g i
' 'Q
.=
3
- - - - - ;j -
r :,
~
..+..._..
..s.'
{
l 1-l
.... s.
..e
?
~
l
! I l
i i
}
i !
l I
{
~
l I
I l j
l
- l
._ 1
}.
i 3
~
l' A
i~
l ll f
i
, i j - 2
- f-F
-t'*
l 1
4 i
1 I
l l 1
.e p.
_jw.
I a
i l
!!!. : l I
s
.,a,;...
i,
,u, 1
i
,2 B
g:
m t e s
~
r.
q.a 4
?
nuna w iem a
FIGURE B-36 PQ HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA LJ DESIGN BASIS EAP.THOUAKE ELEVATION - 659'-C" (SLAB NO 4)
REACTOR AUXILIAR'l BUILDING EAST - WEST COMPONENT p
w
g CLIENT DETROIT EDIS0i!
hbbE()b DESIG, BY I
DATE April 1t, 1 /
CNEINUDR2 OtECKED BY 4H5 DATE 4/r e 72, SHEET _
OF JO aa a:
=
e -
.. m....
....i.
3 J:
5
- 4 ij i i sV/-i,!j{1-g
- i
/
.a_.
i l
l i
////
b q.l aw
_..l i J. !.
e o e,<,
M s#
- A/
j !.....i.
et a
. W f f f i
=s 5:5
,.,N /, /
, l. r..1.,
I!. i i
3 11
'8. 'b1
//
1 7.
/
a r m a
l lj '
/>/
.j /
t I a
z g
~
I
/
i I
0 a
I
- i. l
(
.t. n.. ~
1". f r
l l.O f
l I
N \\\\
I I
.... j.. [.L.!
l
~
i8
\\
l d D
d-a
--- - i L _L_
i
-. LL.-.. ! -
i i
i i
i i
_ u 1_
ll l l
l i
., _.....,a
~
l l l i-J I
l...
i 1
4..._...._.__.-.;4 li N%\\i i
i i
i:
i i
R g
-4 e
b l
I l
i
{. - t... g. 1 y.+,i 3 l
i
- 'i l
l
- )
~
r
._.__.5
- I. :.. 1 7.
a iIi 4
l l
.t ififf; 11ie f i t I t
t f
t !I f
111 ?
! I ? t tttt tt t t t
i 1
1 t
1_ tt af f f g
f f n 1 $t iij, j
i 2
3:
- 9 9 9 *-
9 s 4 & '
savn s 'Wemeny FIGURE B-38
~
i HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
' h.
DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 684'-6" (SLAB NO. 5) l
' REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST-WEST COM PONENT i
l e
5
{'7 CLIENT DETROIT EDISON PROJECT EURIC0 FEH1:I JOB NC 3988
' 9A* Er]T&Ud JBY DESIGN BY 9 .L DATE Anril 18. 1972 v
l-2 CNDINr:crtG CHECKED BY_1M-)
DATE 4/ M > 7!- SHEET OF l
j
.I E
I:
3 mn m
9 e
e s 8 8 n
., ~
I I
il i
ll-t
.,l a
~
l
, l t J
_ a 1l;.;,.
1 J
- i j
l l
I4Ii !
I i.
4
, j.
ll-g
_....._.._.a 4.-
/
.t
- 9 9.
9,_ 9_
' //,IlI
> -a a
mm 7) a O-6 % SS 7
J Q E aa
~
/'
/j'
..; O 1
' l' i
r I
a M Yd l
j
.3 v
t m
r-N tn u
I i d,.
4 i... _4
_.-, 5 1
I s
i l
g l
l t
l g.
j.
4 m
pp_
.. _1.
._..; 2 k
i
?
i
.. _. i ;....
- l a
i.,, 6}i i l I
i i
,a I
l ll} l i !
I i
i i
- ~ '
7, 1
l
- ll li l
I s
..l-ll ll l i
l 1 )... - -.-__ _ w s l
)
p
- NQ-j j
.i
__ +
...a
' \\ -l;.,
t I
]'
I R
I s
1..
I,..... z I
i r
i l
1 -
f f 1i i iI I f iff1 if i f f
f f
f f
f f?91 n t t
- i. ffI1 ir
?1 ?I1 g$
$E 3E S 3
0 0
.t 1 %
N 9
9 8 3
L"
- 9
~
mas ww+ m Q
FIGURE C-7 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA s
k$
OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTCR BUILDING SLAB EL. 64 l'-6". 659'-6" $ 684'-G'"
.. ~,.
k*
4.
O E
O O
O M..,
-m C'.
)
e 88 M
38 le is M
to to S.
~
,..r....
r,,
G3 me.....
1..
F O R E QIII P M E N T'.
LOCATED WITHIN A F
....-DISTANCE = 2t FROM THE WALL WHERE
[b ue; -
t" t IS THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB.
- W t1 ias
. F t.
N C'2 ao u
Q
- g g I
.._: u Q
m as I to w.,
s y
u i
0 q g u
r o
>O<
- - k;..
ItAMi*l ut;
- a r
rmm m$$
l
,,.. -1 '.'i.
I mrli 11;t; 9 R ;!j p
.I g
m s' g m m
to g
,,. ),.
,,Agg.II t*
pgn
.f
. -. u.
$ m (,"
/'}
/ '!..
l'A! al
- l N(;
I n
-4 m $ -i gg3 7
,/
.. - _.} u o
/
p;. E.1 W-
_g m O
- m. 2 mc b;i.my g a
u j/ tg ogm u
am o, 3; c z
9Em o e
o.-)
)m. g g
/
}
,g':]
ym g,, m ]
g
.l'
.5 g
.3 oO l
I gqq g
l l'
.a Oo 4
yp
- u. o n l
3
-e n mm ia>
i
- [D l
'h d
{h l
i
{
'f' G
?
tv d r
i
\\.
a l
., e i
i.
p*
i i
- e l
.l l
}.
is is
/
3 s -8 i
I 1....
[.
i m e i.
mg j
m.
,i s
I w
\\
c,,
u i
3,
.............tu..,
u o
u s.
V
~
s
--.--y--
O O
Q
\\,
i Co ru m.<n y
30 21 a
30 5.e U
to to
- g CD ne g.
....r.
me
- FOR EQUIPMENT:.. LOCATED WITHIN A
-2 no
_. DISTANCE = 2t FROM THE WALL WHERE n'
j t IS THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB.
gg i.e
~
2.
_ its
..j.... _._
9C aa G
7,
. _ _.._ __~....
nQ gpc te; 3,
3 -q m
<m
_} _
r to u
to f *)
-21_ DAMP.II C O$m to 1.
- 2%
DAi1P RG 9oon md
- [
5% DAMPRG O
mC$C
- k =..-,.
- 5 n $
>mr$
n G '~
$ Gi Le
}
10%
DAMl'.LI G
~ ts i
-1 3
j O $ -d
{>a
}
-J..
(S g o w
e, m,
m
.F I g m f*.
l mHg C r
y.
3 M W H
to C H M
OC2n I-
\\
l
~ Le' 5 5 Q O
Oo
(
.s
.3
.g O;
3>g g y
]
1-Xmm 1
./...,
,e m@
m 1
e o
h j
.5
~
s >o n
,s
. _ f
- l __
.3
=
0 o
i_-__
>0 o
4
~
~
s H y>
8
- -I q I
I Oy m m O
i g) 3 3 -...:
.s 9,..
.._ __g-1
.C n d Go,
s, d 2
I W-M, t
M O y
s.
_g
=
g s
- s.,_,
m t
l s
6 u
.[. _.
_ _f...lp
}
l
~
.4 t... j s.
..._....g gf) \\J1 33
,ig
,e s
?
~
m t
s e
N.O i
l 3.
e r "O
$m
..;.I,....
. __.. _ r s =.,. _ ; _..
. L_ _..
i,
.ic
...t.
.. 1 m
m 4
_..._i.....__...~..,...-_=__-
o, 1 :.
o
- ... k._ u......ii..
t.t!ii J.. L __m._u Lt Li.u c.,,
n 2.
.........u....1...
2
.i t,
is z.
Pe+'.T, Se..
I I
Ct. LENT _ _ DETROIT EDIS0il CO.
~
g
^
0 PROJECT E!RICO F M I JOB t40 S/A" QLR]T&e y L).! N, e,f mD5 ossics,y saa os,en,11 s.
,c7, i
1!:tNGINCDA83 -
OiECKED BY_.)_ dis DATE Ti 0/71 SHE ET __._ OF
{
h-O
{
~~
t 1
9 9
e
- t c
2 8 8 8
,I E
E:
l p;+g,*;.i
[^
e
,n i,
u..
.. i a:.
!l l2 t-g-m-i j
-4
'h
!a 1
j-i i
~
f l
., ' l -.
h, r
.4 l
t
....I. _ g
- a. ).
i 4...
l '
.a,
[
I f.
ll
'l l
l
=
l l
g i I U
8
- .]
O 0 0.0
- 4.,
N N NjN
/
j
'O
$h$i$
li.
1
<m n!<l<
/.
d
-v
._.~.
m-
',. m('d "is
..k, l
)
h.
uv
. s.
J
,l
/
l !
'/-);l l
t l
\\. 'i k.
lt
<i \\
!i
\\-
'C '
z
_._ q _.
... ~..
t.
t 1 _. 1'l i i I
+
~
!I l'!
!\\
I I
i
{..
l
..i q._ y.
.. 3 I! i I
I i
o i
t a
l a
s n
$ 1 I l,
t.
l
...i.
r=.
l w
8 l
6
..s b
i NKN t._.i
'\\
- )
l l
i i..
+
. i 4
I :
?
I i ii-
.in 1
i<
1-1-
T a
!>"i it i 1
i nii i>>r inn ti i i i
i
- s s
s e a 4
A'
- 3 i
3 g:
nons we.e em T
FIGURE C.
t.% % M VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA b'. $ f DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL. 641'- 6, 659'- 6" 5 684'-6" 9
's s' Q. M,
'A Q
fw
_ __ _ r - g, FERMI UNIT 2
- Project #6139-40
)
3 p-i EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
!EP/DFile SAliGEUT&LUUDY g
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
lPage 1 of 6
'EM$dfi"c*-
-r FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME:
Diesel Generator Gauge and Instrument Pancl EQUIPMENT NO. :
SPEC. NO.:
3071-19 LOCATION:
RHR Complex, El. 590' EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
EMD File #013860 Containing Seismic Test report from Uyle Laboratories, report #43961, DECO File #TI-3175.
2.
EMD File #001659 Containing Seismic Analysis of Support Structure for Engine Instrument Panel.
l Date:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Approved by:
Date:
i x
- 6139-40 I
FERMI UNIT 2 (Project ONEOU((IblUUUY h
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC (EMDFile #
q s
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6
'g7fuggga;j
==
QUAL.IFICAII0t1
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
/
Normal + Operating Basis Earthquake Normal + Design Basis Earthquake ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METH0Q:
Instruments and gages are mounted on this panel.
Active instru-ments, namely Synchro-Start Electric Switch Model ESSB-3AT, Dresser Industries Ashcraft Pneumatic Temperature Transmitter Model C-5680, and Moore Products Co. Pneumatic Tempere.ture Transndtter Model 33, Nullmatic Pneumatic Controller Madel 55 were premounted in a fabricated test fixture and were subjected to biaxial random 5 OBE's and 1 - SSE motion test in the f rea.nency range of 1-40 cach of 30 sec. duration.
Test was conducted in the two principal Panel is mounted on a support structure through vibration planes.
Support structure was analyzed by considering the panel isolators.
and vibration isolators as a system of springs and mass.
Frequen-cies were obtained by computer program A033.
The panel was found to bottom out due to the seismic loads.
Due to seismic and impact loads, stresses in the support structure were obtained.
t e
l I
FERMI UNIT ?
Project #r139-40 SAGGENT&LU:!DY h L EMD File #
l EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC i
'm:WCmo d
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 c sec r o o QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPF;:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR []
2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR X 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
Diesel Generator Gage and Instrument Panel 1.
Scope:
[] NSSS
[X] BOP 2.
Model Number:
Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
Colt Industries 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
attached 5.
Physical Description Appearance: Panel made up of sheet metal and angles L
Dimensions: 28" x 8" x 62" Weight: 320 lbs.
6.
Location: Building: RHR Complex Elev.:
590' or diesel generater skid 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
[] Bolting : Number:
Size:
Welding: Weld Tyep:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
Vibration Isolators 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
6.4 o 9.3 Hz Side to side :
6.6 o 9.1 Hz Vertical:
3.45 Hz 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
[] Laboratory Test 6dAnalysis Other System in which located:
P.H.R.
10.
a.
b.
Functional description: operation of Diesel Generator c.
Equipment required for:
Hot Standby Cold Shutdown
[] Post LOCA
I i
FERMI Ut41T 2.
Project #6139-40 SARGENT&LUNDY l
EQUIPMEt1T DYilAMIC EMD File #
l QUALIFICATI0t1
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C *d6C A G O h
{
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
3071-19 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes O No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test O Analysis
] Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
Seismic Simulation Test Reriort b.
Number and Date:
43961-1, 5-1-78 2.
Company that prepared report: Wvle Iaboratories & Cbit Industries 3.
Company that reviewed report: Sargent & Lundy V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: @ Seismic only O nyarodynamic only O Seismic and nyarodynamic 0 Other (Specify) :
O 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
Attached 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra: N/A O Absolute Sum O SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : 2%
Basis for damping: Nureg 101 Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required): N/A O zPA O Other (Specify) :
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
6.
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
0 No j
m
l
(
-}
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 Lr lU O
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
c NI:25:5
)
I "c ^c o l
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 ay...;
- e. v.
o VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
j 1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
E] Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis Multi axis I.
O 3.
No. of qualification tests:
I l,_
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
4.
Frequency range: 1 to 40 Hz 5.
[]No 50Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test: N/A Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting:
Number:
10 Size 3/8" Gr 5 0 weldin9:
weid type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
X Yes No O Not applicabic 9.
Test results including modifications made:
Passed 10.
Other tests performed:
None VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis
[] Static aaalysis Static coefficient analysis Dyna.nic analysis:
[3 Response spectrum
[] Time history 2.
Model type:
[] l-dimensional
[] 2-dimensional 633-dimensional
.. 4. _
g:
t i
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40
~.
! SARGENT&LU:]DY
}
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
i awa:NQ2RS.
i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 e-.c co i
i 3.
Method of analysis:
for Support
]
Computer-aided calculation i
programs used:
A033
[3 Hand calculations 4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
[@Yes No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Support Tubing 19941 psi 28800 psi Weld on Tubing 1772 lb/in 2816 lb/in Vibration Isolator 294 lb 380 lb 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Deflections are not critical.
Calc Allow Element Stress Strecs i
l l
VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l
\\
i I
t f
List of Devices on Diesel Generator Instrument Panel a.
Manometer Passive b.
Pyrometer Passive c.
Temperature Gage Passive l_
d.
Temperature Gate Passive e.
Pressure Gage Passive i
r f.
Pressure Gage Passive g.
Pressure Gage Passive i
Passive i
{
h.
Pressure Gage I
i.
Pressure Gage Passive i
~
j.
Tachometer Indicator Passive k.
Pressure Switch (3)
Passive 1.
Pnewmatic Transmitter Active m.
Pnewmatic Controller Active n.
Slenood Valve Passive o.
Speed Switch Active I
i l
l
~
i I
Pcg] N3. 48' i
((
D u.,4 ! (.y r,. d b b k.e (
(
R M m. 4 461-1 s
- U. r r
.a e-Q.~
I N*! \\. A % d t !. e. f*, %
g IUI.L SCALE SHOCK SPhCTRUM b Peak)-
1.0 '
10 "
100Q 1CCO j
%I s
DAMPING C5d
- (
m....,._._____.
f
~......._......__..:
4,
......_j_ _ _v
, -_,- h
..___y.._.._.._...
..__,s___y.__3._,_._,...,._
}
?..U$.~.~#-I!~55M-Wr~:Mrit:5:~~- -IT-~r: ;IE. _.-: _:M_-W.D:r.-@i :*-W:_-E;T -i Erf :M_* ~.A
~
r i
s
......_..__...__.1..-_._..._._._..__._.._.._._.__
.... L_
_.. ~,. -._
.s
, :.- :_..=._.=_.3.___.' -.n : := u.. =: : : :.-- = :- w -- =:r: = ::=.: = : : - :n ---:---- : = : _ -: -.-:.- r 2 -- - - --M: -
- :u - -.== _. : - - - - ~== = v u = - _u=_. : : = :.==.. =.. : :. _. :.. r
- =-
{
.: u._
_ _.. _... _ _. _. - =.__.__.___.____._._....._._..__..___.._r.-].
_a._._3_._...
q__.._.__.;
=-
,...r._..-,_.4
_.4__._._.,-...p.<
6
..._s.
- _..-__.--=
8 w_ _ _.. __
k,....t._^_y1
-...l_..
f.*- t.'. -t '-*
3_._ _...g
.._ _a.
gr r __.g.._
-.}
.-4.t
-t 1
...P t 1 6._m _
6-.-- --- J-- + -H 7 j p
7
- - - t-L-y-4-!
~
. F-j
,t
...___.4
.s
).
~.s
_..__v.___...,_..._._...._......._.-_._.__..
_4..i.
i,
, _,r_.
.j....___. p a
s_ ;
- ___ o........_....;
-y
_._.. n... _. =...=.. _. 2..=. :_ _ _- _u..=_.: :.._::. c_r_:: : __N. =..
...._.... :.r.
.:.u =..__::. = _. =...u.. 7 s,c. w. _. r..: ;.t. ;
.:.......___.l_=
r.-.t.
- u. =:. -__
.-._.__....--__...~.:7___.___.......
s
..1 e=
..._.._..t.__..
g
! __.._._a__
..m,
=c.:
u._... =.. t = - -. _ ru. __ u.u=.. : :3 am'
(
. [ := =. _.. _. - - = : _.. =. --... _._ : : -. :: :.== :.< := 1 : n..:.;. _;._: :=.: _ :_;. = _=. =_. _ = :_ : : _ ;_2 - - - -r.
- _; =.. :::-~ _. -. :-~~-
- -- :. -- : r - _._.
fi
- -.v:
s! /
c v,
_..__..._..-..._..))
t.
_:1__
a _..__ _ _. -...
=
.t i_._._4...
_A.3,
/._..=...
- ; i, j
q_
. : a.;
r.a _. _ l_.._,... _y. }. S. l
.._ _{
l ;, i j._4 ll - % _. - _ _ ; _ _.p
_ i._;
.y. _ _.
7._. p.,..v...,. 4 j
]
i
.4...
J
._.._..,__..e
. _ = _. -.
....._..._.-..n.
i g
j
? [
_i
.-.4
..__..._...,..,_.v.,
('
..: =::=, =.=._ u..:.=._.=_:.=.=.::---=--
_-.._==.:-=u=:--~._._=.=_._=.
- ..=
~.,....d.
L
..====.==:=
=..:.
- = ~.
- =__p__
..---m_
. = - : :.. = = -==:- - : :.
, 1 -
. _ _ _. _. _....... _.......-.._...._..__..t...t__.._.,........
-_...---. r--._ ;. -. _ _...
i i
g......
,.., _. _1 1,
.~._._...m_,
.=
.:==
.:.._:.=--=.u=_-
.a._ _._:. um=. u.. ___. :.._. v...:; _.
y
~___::_\\. :..
- -- - _.
- _ __...=. :==- :- - -- _.=_=.. =_::.
.. _. -. _===_- - := =r= =~ : :.. : = - - __:._?.
- . t
.-__. =:. v.:
2 _
._____.._._L_.._.._...._......m.---__.__...... _... _. _...t. t.
i i
... r. -
,, _ _.... _. _ ~. _ _ _ _.. _
_t,-4___.._.,.__.....,.
_r_.
.__.s.., _i_. t...,
g
.. _...---_ _ _. ~
}
s i
.s
._. f 9_4
+-, j..
p....
....4 i
i w
6-.
... 9..
f___4.. _._L_ L_...>
g w,,,,
t i
8
,._. i
'.j
..9 m__
I 1
8 A
, _4..f.
I
%u.
i i
l i
1 I a
e e
i i I
a s
.1 a
a s 4 ie>-
- 1.,,
..,. 10.
. I,dO 1000 t
I Frequency -(Hz) *
.4
?
S-S/V l
AXIS
(~ f. v' L.CCATION.NO. W'c
(
)
5 TEST RUN NO.
M h
p
.* O
- u.. e.
y ~
er.
m
g ;, (
/.g,.,. fu O dim /h P' Piga No. 72 3,
y,.,L w o p. J.,,
Report 2. 4 h D.i sc y
.FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Pea.M i
,i t c.,
g 1.0 to 0 1c0 Q 1000 0 h
DAMPING l 'L%l joo.--..._....._..__._..__,-_...._.__......_.._-..__,___........_-_.-
g __
..-___.4......_._._.,_.....-._,...
1
.i--,- i.
...s..
V,
.. m. 4
.-.-.-e_..4
- _.-._e
~
N.52-i F
~
kb i
... _ _...._.._ _ _._ 9! }-!_M-5".. il 5 f5Md@--US S.N 5 ' ~
.15 U
.l.__-
I.
- f._-.ip._5_-M.7 r.
.....__._.,_....a.._..
__......t,._._.......___.
.., _..........__._.L..
.r.
t,
.J..
I.c,_.._..___.
l
+.. _ _......i_..-...._.... 4. +.__._._-
f
,.. }_
= =._=.=..==_-..._ _.._.,_._.u.._: ~
_t=:. : = -n : :._: 1.- _. :
,=.._...;,_,. l. - : t. -
1 e.::,,
s
- ...u :. :... n. =..=. - :. _=._:.. =. ;.-. I =.
a 1,
s,.- ;-_. __._ _ s _._. _..._ _._... _
_ _ - _ _. _..,.... _. _. _. _. _.....__....._.__......._.__....t._._.... _. _ _....................... x.....s s
~ _ _. _ _ _ _ _
..._ _ n.
..___.,__.....__.___a___,-___.._.._,...___.,.L......._____.~...........
g ;.._
..t.
- _._... _ m. _
. _ _ _.. _.t.
. i..g..... :,,
f..,
- o.......
..a.
1.- -
,..g._..
---i- "
d- -
i- ' ;-!.,
. H...
1 j._.._... _...p.
_)
.t_____
g __ _...+ _4 t-_._..
a t
i i
..a.._...
__....f..._-...._._.___..__.__.g.___.._-.....
.... _.. _ _ _.... -..._..._...._.-..a.
.10. r_.. _ _
.....,r__..._....--_-___
-t
,____,.____,._,r_.
_... __...e _ %. :.. _,. _ _. _,... _,
- , c y.. __,
...._..!.1-.__
- -O*.
,^^ *
. __"**D*
a !... _" ;...J. {
e g
- 7. _... _....,.... _. _..... ~.. _ _ _ _
._------ y _.._. _.. _. _.
.n._
..~
.a
_._m+._,.____.
._.._. _;. _ _ _, _. _.._.. __. _._.- -..._ _.._,...r_L,,
~
".s _-. -
~~~_+-.~.~._~.~~~'..'~~~~~',~_~.'_',~_~.-.~~~...~.~~.~~'~~~-4'~~' ~'_~~_~4'.~.~
~
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
i_..'_.~~_.._,_s.-
~.
.. ~ -
~
(&,.
' '. I..~5.. }
- U.si., _ _ (~'..Wl_ N_.E.h ;..V. __^5:. ;.; [5..-~_
_ ?_5 5.._-5.~ O : 5.s. _*.E. f.~_'._'.b_. _. _ _ _.. _... '. _... _. _
b._ _ ? ^- U.Y...:
^~~
...... ~.,:._~.'C. s.. *.
~ ^
2
/.d 1
..L..-.__._ _. _.._._ _. __...
..l,..
. e
_._..p.._9..-_._.
,.......... I 8
.L.,
m._.,_.__[_...
.4-e_..-..._._,_e_......._,.___...e...I6._. g.
+.
- e...._ -.
4.- _
+ _.,
-... t.,.1. t
..._t.e...
.. e e
J
.,.e.I~.,..
,6...
I....
H...
- +
...4.
.4
_._J J. 3. f i
.;.i
.i
.4.s.
J._.
9_. L
._... k
.... L...._
._ ~..
. __. __ l
.6.._.
..._5__.....
_. _ t. _.. i. _. _..._.
4
..l...._,_y.....[
..,.j.,
......4_
i*
.j
_.a. 4. p _ --- __. _...{.
-a.4
..... p j q __
_. s... ; -
j.-.
~
...g_
1-
._.._.t.
q...
.. 3
....... r 4_
. _. - _ + -
._.,.q
+._..7._.-.,
.. g p._. _.. _ _
._7__..
i.g....
g. _ +
u_ _ __,.. 4 _u
. h a.n
.,.. - - I.!
! > c'
- I
..1.r.... :..:-. :.t=. _. _ L.. a.
p L...._ _.. : :.. _ m_ _ _-t....__.. _ c...: c - :.... _.
..,,__-..=.--e
.... a _.,...
_...__._.._....___._._.__a.._.__.__......_..._...,._.. _ _,..,....
_ _ __. _ _. _ _.... _.... _ ~.
l
-._..___y._... _..... _ _ _ _. _.
,_f*_
y_.
L.._._._
a.
6...
....., _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _.......1......__..,... _.. _,..,
y._-
.,.. _. _.............5 3_..
z p..__,__.,
...u_..
4 _. :
. _#:-.r _ 2....m _- 7 u n := : n_-
.t
.. ux t _..- = 2 x-
.u :.r. _. _u._.
u._
...;. u._:. = =..._;. = a
__:_...c._1__us._;
u..
.- r
-,.em
_.=.__...,...._._..-'._........._.._...:
.=--
t
_ _.. _......_. _.,._..i...
..._....a...... _.. _... _....I....t
.....s..J.*T*..
_y..._
_...._T~.._._._.._...._-~_._.. _ _. _ _._ _.. _..
,.... _ _..___ _. _..____..,.4...
_, _,._ m__,_;
. - _ _ _. _.._.4....-._.._.;.
1_
a _
...,i..... ;
- . q _ _.._._.,
_._.4_.._.... __ _. -..,.. _ _..,.. __.
l e._ q.4
_, _..,. _y.,.,
-__. j _..___.g F -t,-
i- - - - h 1 - F ' - H -i
.~
F j.__;
2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2
3 4
5 6 7 89*1 2
3 4
8 4 7 4 9P I
10 100 10C0
/
Frequency (Hz)
..s.
AXIS -
LOCATIC:: NO.
N.
4 TEST RUN NO.
~
bQ7 6
rn
a u
i Pip 50. 73 4
t port No. 42161-1
\\
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g eak) 1.0 O to O 100 CD.
1000 0 r.
DAMPING M
~ - N.
..,_.3
....r....
__.-.--._...,q
- p..
- s. g.
--..._r.4_* 6._.=--
........p......_......+-....;.*. :.qh:ri.fi--p_ i'-i H -h-i-M F:.4 N.v.-i.. :. ' - f.+.W p p.
g Q F-. : :::
- { - :- M.--..i; 5 p. d r:
..:...~_.._._..t...___._..._..- - -..... _. _.........~....._u.L._..
-.._._._.._ _.._.rc._.___._._....
- ~..3. __ _..,.. _
...........1 g...._.2..._._.
_....... ~.
.. f.,.,1
....._.____4._.,..__.,..._.._._
4.-
. l.
t
.._. _-. L_..._
-.....t..
....:. t.w...
i
..._.___._._....:.-::_.._2_x._.=_...-
- . =_.
.c. s... _ _.
- r.......
......,.....-.=:_.=.=..._=....a:..
. I_....t
- 3..
i<
l.....:.r._. :.. :..
_ _... _... -_....._...._..._.._..,g_.___
. ~. _.
.. _ _ _ _ _. _._.___: _. _. _. - - ~s-. _._-
..,....n_.
._._._.._...._J._,-1
-~
. =. _..
_. _ _. -.. _a_., m.
- --w s. -.
4---i +,-i_J.. J.-
i' i
-s Y
r
_4 t-J i.
1-3 4
1 I
4 1
?
..._.a
..._....j
..f.___._,_.
.j _..
- _.. m....-_..._q
....-.\\..
. u..a.
- r __.._- _ _. _~.- _.. _- _ _. _-... n.. _ _.w.
. n...l, c
..=_ - j __._
c
._,-...__.._.2_._...._....._._; _ _ _. %.. __ _;.._. __;..
'p._.__..g...........-
-__.m..
~.__.
-.... _..~.._........__._.._72._.,_.,_._....i*
a t._ _ _. _ __ f.... ~_. t m.
- 3..
s;_._____.._._..
- ._. _.. 4 c, _.. _
0-.. _
-~
.-. w _m,.-
s _,_
z
_.. _ f e._
.e
-L
--.a v
. _-.f_... _.. _... _.. _ _...... _.. _. - _ _... _ -. _ _. _ _..... ~ ~. _.5 5 ?.5 5:S -.~.
.~_T~ 5 ~-~~~~h 5. ~i.t^_5_W 5-!b.
~
p, 1-C $.~- ; f.5E ~~W. :-i-m W ::-5
.l.5 5 5 :::.
'k 5=~_"u -
(%
_ _t... _ __......... _...
o e.
.,.s_..
n L..
n.....
4.. {.....--..---,--4*a-..4.,.
.e....,,I
._.__.4__
._ M_I._.. _.
. _+_......,.._ _. ~._ t 4
+=t-4.
g
- -t-4
.+.
,,,aL..
+... -
j
._-.., m.
,r. m_,.
W 6 r q _,. + R,, _ -
y Oe
.- y 4,
_- e_f _. ;
uy I
l.. 4.. g..4._1
}.
t
..2_.:.
....q.
- g,
- ;_.4 q...j. 4.h l i
I r
__ ~_.....__._.....a...
_.._...__.._.-._..j
___.....,_...+..,.t_-.
g.i.
=. _ _.,.
..,..,. 4 _.r. 3
- 7. p -- _
- .. : a._:. -.....:. s..: x
-p._._.
- _.== ; _.. i...... s
' o _.: _:. _:. L.:. = :. = ;. _:.=.= :.
- = :-==. :
- . :=_. _. _=.. _...e.. r : t. s :. _ =_= = :. :.. -.- =. ::=. - a : -,
- ._ =.: _
~.
t..=.=. = :. - -. - - :. - -.._ : _:
__..._.z.._.i_.,._..,-..1 4
._...__._._.__..L..,..
- - -.. C._.,.,
4=
i 6..-
--t.____._..__._
F..... -.. _ -..i _ :=.. __ _ _. _ _ =r ::. : =:;=. _- r:r r--.
p.: q. : s. i.: : =_ _ =:.-.u. _ a _. _; :..:. :..... _ q.
P. _
e r-r..:. r_._.n
- z. :.
- :.- n. - _ =.
u., :<__ :._. r
. : -- r :2 -
'2 u.. t.r : : i. -
- m.. ::.
.._.2.
........t..
.._.t_..
n _.. r.. -
..... _.... e e.
=-
. r.__-._
..]
_.-. _ I......,,.5:
L
,4
.+....J
-,Q
, p.
__.. p _f.'._9...,4.;
_l.
_..t t.
_p - m.
\\
, m r-
, i--
-ic.t..
m i:
i i-
- -7 m
r, t
a a
s a 7 e s :o a
a e
s a r s, **
2 3
a s a 7 e 1 ::
1000 100 10 1
{
frequency (Hz)
.g I
.s b
AXIS i
M LOCATION tsO.
l I
TEST RUN NO. _.
M g
'I
. emrmw..
- w. e C-D "W w n -- _. - y
4 s.
P:g3 No. 49 l
t
\\\\
P4 port No. 43961-1 s
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPEC'IRUM'(g Peak) i 1.0 O 10 O tcoE) 1000 O T
a DAMPING e WJ m
c.__._____
.__...,_,-_j 9v.
-_..._-.-..~._..._.-,i e r..
.q I
.A..-.....,. ~.g a-
._ +
r v.
.m l
..._._22:
- .=. t. _ -. -
,. 4 m: :.. :.:_..=_ ru. _ :...e E. ___.
- u. = : = :. _: _. _r. =... _= _=.:..-. _-.y
_-.2:.: a - :.- -- : : n..=_. =.-
_- ~ _ _
-__.,.___T_..._.__._.
_ = _
.__a._...._.___._.-..
- s g :. : :..=.:q c__.:.:.4..; n...:. =..c.a.. : m_. :..a. =_._ ___.: =. : :. :._.-.. _
..u...: :: =.._~ _m._. =... r _..; a.n_.. c.t :. 2...;. u. r :.; =_~.s.. _:a..,,
_c.
.._r..___...a.
... _...... _......_.... r
.__..._.._..._._...;..._._____.._ _ r _...._ __._
_. -._. _. ]
......._..1.__.._._._..__.._~. _... _ _._.. _.............t._... _. _ _ _...
I.,
- ..._..w.
......}-.......,
g._.4.
. _. -.... L. _..,_._.,......_ _.,.;.._..
_ ~...
m _
.._.__..m.
-i h
. f._
N.p p;
7_..H.
[
..7 __.r__
,_.l.
p..
.p
..t..
_ L p_.m._, j H.
{
f.
- Q-l
1
- 4. _.[_ '
_w t
_d,
._..._...,4
_~
3
_-._..___.._...f_-_.___._____...
r _..
.,w __,_ - _
4 9,i__ _-.... _./.. _. _
-.,.g._.
_ - -..:.. ;.2. _c q
..,__......g___..___
uu= c.u_ w. : u--::a cu: = =.;2_u r..u;=...
-_.__.- =.. x_., = -a : = =: =. :
_a L.u _2 :. m._. :. _==
n._. u-u_ _ u. = _ _=-._=== - n -. s. : =- - - ---=.==... _
_.. _ m..
= =. - - - = - = = = - = -. -
m
. _ =. _ -
c s_=--
_ 4 t
_._..._.i._
_..4
- c.,
_. _ =.
,.!a..__.=._.,_=.=.-==n.=__==.__.._=._=_=-==._.=.._==__===..=._=n.._=_=
= - _,
=
s_
.. _;J
._----__---n.._._._--
,.s.,.o__-__.:..----_.___._---.-~._...~..~-
.5,
-.. _ _.... _ _-.t_.__._...____._._.___
- - * - - ~ ' *
~
- - - - * - - =
' ' + ' - ' -
_.. _.. _ _.,. _.,. _ _ _.t
- =
o "'
<p-
..t o
- _ _ u_ _
i t
i i
i
. \\.., i t
a,
-- y
- i ; -m
- ; =;=_c.
- =.r.
- c ;, _; - - - -.:. a r; ;.;; _. na- ;.; =.-;.:=.:.r
=. _ = -.. _
. -.u
--=:...
,. L.r a.2
._.___.=.c:..c;..r.-=_=.___..
- =
- = = =. _ -
3,____.____=__.
a 4,..._._
L.. ;- N l
%===.--
.2.: * : 1
/-----"--.-t
- .:-- ru ;.:..=:=.: as : : ;;:.:;-;; :~ :.,.;;c. v- - - - 1
..- ;.i~ ;. :;- ;= -. -. r== - -. __- -. :
l=. := n=_ : :
.c _- _:: -:-.' n _ :.- :. -.;--: = _. _==..._ _ _=__..._.. _. _ _. _... _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _. _. _.. _ _
5
'o i_a: :;;. :: - :.-
._._._.._.___.._..-.__._.._._.._.____..__...___t._.._..
.... 1. _, q
.=
e
- ~~
3 6
- --+-r.-- !
f
!, v t 1
1 I
I
--.i i
3 I
f I
c g
,_h i l
, ^
I 1.
4 3
3 a
g g 7
- 8 to 2
3
~4 s s 7 a 9:3 2
2 4
6 6 'A5M 1
=
1000 b
100 10 6
1 Frequency (Hz) 5.:Shr 4
AXIS
,r LOCATION NO. _ ' M s-G d
TEST RUN 'NO.
I Pop r ( 7 R
o
COB @f NHNW APPS21X A l.-
PROJECT E " u T C O v e 9'.'l st-3147 cm fi n ca f*n1 I Cd LJ e.. LI a? r g93r qr es dhCif3J DESIGN BY CLM
', R:v. 1, 11-15-76 7 CNGINCCnc CHECKED SY
.71*1 I
I l
I E l V. N O.
l
' d a s 91 I
l I
yT t
% f l l
I l
l I
IHtfl Att lC f requexy. CPS 53 1s 20 10 10 11-20 LO
.s n0 _....
.j.
g r :,
i a
j ne
~
tso _
l 1
e I
i j
i no ii j
to _
t--
I-i 1
- 10 LO -
i' i
I i i ii
-u i
l l lll l-l I
f (0
l s.c I
I I
I llll l
s.0 a
r
(.
i l
I l
It I
10 -
i 1
i
- ' )
j
$% DAMPII'O l
1 l
L' -
}i y
i
-l% DAMPING I
5
' 2% DAMPING I
L5 I
/
g!
5% DAMPING i
,_/
8
^
~
e i
,3 I I
[
,/
?
g
_- \\
/
6
?
tg
_ /_
/
{
'f t
i 1
i i
4
-i
{
2 i
\\/
i i
i t
T i
i 6
i l t f
?
1 V
"{
j ^j I
7 i
i i
yx
\\
I l !!
1 i
X i
1 i
>J; j
i I
x\\,\\
I I f, Q
l l^
s i
l x
L J -
/
-].,
s-i i,
I r
I i
I!
f f,
.is e
og
)
l 30 -
l x
.,.12 i
+
i i
i N N'g
-i
- g i
i N
q p -
$l5-i i
j i
I t
i IN K J
1 i
s r e r el, ! i 5,
,l.,,,
!i!,!,
.l, \\ l 3
r
,,ii
~ e e e e
.cz
.c a
.e
.os
.os a
.2 a
4
.s
.6 to ts to q[
y rww. s.c.
9.
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING EASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH A-2 q
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, Q
ELEVATION:
5908-0" l
l
hj, CLtENT I E T M 0 1 T E D 1 w I.
gppgy, 3 vah 6 v L-6 g g rge/
PROJECT errtTcq ever.*T st_3147 Q,A D 72 C.a DESIGN BY Cl F
,Rev. 1, 11-15-76 4
1CNCINCC AG CHECKED DY T;G M t R Y. H O.
l l
DATE
. ry J I
l q
IHlflALSl^
- f l
fret ency. CPS p,
II 33 20 10 10 M
10 LO
.s 50 i''''
f3
'Clo i
l-i i
n.o 4
- --- i tu _
i I
i i
l L $f'. DAMPINIT 110
]
t i
i
/ O - Ifa DAMPING I
' i i
to_
i 33 V /_ 2,'f; DAMPING
!I T
i
-. ]' / /
l l
i l
'i Ii M
f
.57, DAMPING
~
I u
e
~
u
~
I
((
/ /
l II I
u
~
u u
i i
j l
J ll / V /!
I i
Iil i i
10 in r-I i
D d
10 f{
i
~, ts I
i g
ts :
l
- I i
i I
L-i i
{
?'
-/
N n\\
n i
m., y i
i ii, i
i U
y i
!7
~.3_
a 1
i it N
i l
?
//
l i
- '3
// /
I M
i i
l i
1 1
k
]L
\\\\\\\\ !
I i
l
-l'
~,
i l
i i
f
\\.\\h 'I i
]
i l
5 3
i l
I
/l l
xs
?
[
];
i
.a
.n l
l
\\ y;
~
I i
i 13 x
w 18 i
i N
4 i
i I
i l
\\
N U
i i
I I
I I
i i
-i
-,,,,l,,,,I,I,
,l,......I.,,,,,,,I,l,!,l,i,,l,h\\,
.ar
.as
.w
.cs
.o6
.os
.n
.2
.3
.a
.s
.a to ts a
ter% s.:.
U HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESFCNSE SPECTRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHO.UAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST-WEST A-3 l
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, ELEVATION:
590'-0" e
CLIENT ne'"nnTm enT90M APPENDI:: B
- a gec'g"s'glzm
- $7 SARGEDTaturmy g
u u,e
^
AU-CHECKED BY
o u I
s t Y. N o.
i i
DATE
- 3 r( H i
INITIALS
- M.$
1 l
Frequency. CPS 3I 10 10 1) to to *
.5
~'
i i
, gg
.. i..
.y M9 l
l nD I
..p.L. _.
~
[
M.0 l
l.
I e
b i'c
- l b_
gg i
i
!._. 1 l.
Li
-i s
I g,
ao i
l
.?
s i
i
...l a
ia ao
-.-i l
a, i.
3.o 10 l
I ry to l'
I.
l l
n i
i i
i l
1 - -
i; I
I I
I
- yg 10 i
l t
1 i
f A
10 j
l l
- ts j
l l
i
.~
I 0
ts i
P I
I i
I.
I
~
i 5
3
~
I I
I tC i
to l
i s
s r
p
,i ', {
u e
i i
! i i
I i !
i
~
i I 6 1
4
?
/v d:.$fo DAMPING yd.i S
( '.
I i
l
/,F) DAMPING l
I
!l
~ sI 1% DAMPING
[-
i 3
l
./
5% DAMPING l
-,,j
. i 4
i 0
i s / /'/
/-
Ni l
i a
E-
~
..a j
. y -p/ \\ i -
0 I
c,
].:o u
1 a
((
-~
..i..
I.--
x
.\\
0 g, -
W._
i
\\.,
y f
I i
4
~
p
,,., l.,,, x'.,,,i,N!
. i.,
.,.,,..~.n
_ f' '.s'i' ' ' '.os i
i i
.os g
.M
.os
.i
.o
.s 4
.s
.6 Le ts to
.et j
Periar. Sec.
VKitTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA 109-Oli-VW Ol'KliATING EASIS EARTHQUAKE R
Il. ll. it. COMPLEX, WALLS AND s-2 M
STAtt NO. IA, ELEVATION:
590'-0" L
C APPENDIX A e
PROJECT __r2Tc0 v R*.iT
, gg_3147 b,
O [j((q[d,"jgy DESIGN BY_ 0 01
,Rev. 1, 11-15-76 1RN CIN Sct-t C -
CHECKED BY 37M
)
I s a y. N o.
i DATI
'c
- ?.
,l INITI AL5." a 5 l Freguancy. CP5
, 30 31 2
to 10 13 10 10
.5 l
no m_
.),,,
s 15.0 2
l l
1 i
5 118 i,
L
- 9 l
I i
l
_ 20 i
t, - ',,
me _
i i
__u i j u_
j
_ u f
I j
Ji l
l l'
se
---i u
1 I
i I
a o
i
- u I,
i l
l 1 10 le
)
LO J
L9 l
1% DAMPING
~ u i
t 2% DAMPING
~
~
p.
i l
l 5% DAMPING u
T t.
, A O% DAMPING j
- - - ^ - ~ U
////
3 e
s is[
I ' I
- ////
I
-i '
?
~
(.
N
////
i t
! i i
i i
l i 1
)
NV //
?
i I
l I
~
N
\\ [ [!
N f
~
l
'5 t
- w, s
N i
i i
ii i
N, i !.
f,1 i
i i
i l
i l
l E-1-
J
[
[
~
t I
i 1
~
2 I
j-4 D
g l
}
t \\\\ %
3N
]
i i
l i
NN 4,,
3 -
i t i i l i 6
i I
\\\\:
I j
i i
i t
i
- j
\\\\
, !, I, I,
,,,. I b 1'
,,,,I,l, el,
,1,.,,
.,i,
.a
.m
.os
.m
.m
.m
.i
.15 2
a 4
5
.s to u
to rerw. s.:.
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE A-6 R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH t
f COMPOG NT SLAB NO. 1 ELEVATION:
590'-0" t'
m m
nevt..w u j
4 t alb as b.J s 8 1
PROJECT E!mICO FE.T1I sL-3147 v.g D T!]"Q I P M {E Q
DESIGN BY C T.M
' Rev. 1, 11-15-76 3
I CN a t.'J a c m s -
CHEChCD BY SGM I
I a f V. N O.
f DATI t > - ri '4 l
8 INITIALS ' M. f. T l l
l l
frequency. CPS 9
50 33 2
10 s.0 13 10 LO
.5
)
i
..a, 0
,,.;.i.I.
.I.
no.
i
~
d -.._..
4.
gg gg,g 7
I j
e i
l i
, 10 0 i
i l
14 3 _
i
}
f-i i
4 4
ic g
s to.,
i I
l j
l l
~~~
l e
l l
l l
ea __. _
u I
.lg ppgpygg ll E
10 g
I i
2% DAMPING o
a
/.
-5% DAMPING I
l 10% DAMP:I U
n to I
b 5
l
[ to i
i r-l/ Ij\\
10 i
i l
l i
i
- ts t3 i
i k
l l
~
/
I
' e*
i I
u
'#/
/\\ \\ \\
i O
t
- /
p\\\\\\
l i
i i
- {
1.3 4
i
- / f
' u\\ \\\\
i i !
i i
J t
i i
i
-i :
i f/ /
\\\\
\\\\
(i','!
/U
\\\\ W l
! IiI
$ '.'3 1
I j i
i
.NN N!
l I lil n
i i
/
NK
%i l l l i,
w a-i Li j
i E-l
.4 25
.15 -
~
l
[
\\
'.l i
i 1
~
x xg c*
lo i i i
i
\\ \\k
\\W
-j '3
.08
~
I i
i j
1 i
i i
,i 1
i U'
3,3
.06 t
1.5
' ' ' '.as ' ' ' '.os '.ns '.m. '
' '. ' ' ' '.ts
'.4
.05
.as
.z
.i
.s
.6 u
ts za
'.0z Perlad, $ec.
U HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTPA DESIGN EASIS EARTHQ.UAKE
~
R.II.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST A-7
- COMPONENT SLAB NO. 1, ELEVATION:
590'-0" m
CLIENT D?T'POIT FDT ?O
/gPPENDIX B SL-3147
-m t aim m PROJECT Tr:Tc0 CEn i Rw.1. H-U-M u n.bd u' d b Lit.U idl.)vf.
c,3 n m ^d DESIGN DY CLM ICNCINCizrac CHECKED BY SGM l
l u v. w o.
1
(
t i
i ons
,:-, e 4 t
I
-. m n s i< - 5 (
iw r,
ncy ces i
so 33 20
~.0 10 13 10 LC 2 A3
*i' j
i' ' '
- 8 6 ' '
e4 J
'6 +*
'i l
g I
d 14 0,
] 15.0 I'
[
}
lie,
I l
]
i I
ll
.10 7
{
i ;
i j
E0 y'
t i
i r
i
-j i
l i
L' r
i i
(
,so I
i
,?l l - n.
I l 1 i
[
-4 LO i
l l -
5.0 4
t i
10 l
I l
i to l
ll*;
1 o
i l
l l
to 1
1
~
10 I
2
}
i
- 0
}
1 2.0 *
' l I
._ I t,
t, l
1 a
1 l
It LO J
g
~
i i
i t
1 i
i
-. ' r i
i i
i
-j ' k F
i i
i
{
}
b I
I
)
i j'- -1% DAMPE 0 t
j j
qal
,i]
i -
i t
- l
[
2% DAMPIIG l
i,1 L1
?,
5 5% DAMPING I'I j
I l
j
l n
E l
l l
t f,10% DAMPING
'4
/
,- e
(":
j i
\\ T/
I j
~
'/
I d
I j
d,
.2
/
[
}
/ I I
?
/
/
x
'3 iX X
l t
i e
i J. 3
.f x
x 4 x.
ef F
i du NA
\\\\
i i i E, -f NN
\\\\
i 1'
m i
i j.
I i
i l\\A \\\\
i
,,,, 1, I,
,i..,!,,,,l,,.I,,,,
,,,,1 X,\\ M I,,,
!,,.. L,
.=
.e
.a
.as
.a
.os
.i
.t,
.2
.3
.4
.s
.s to ts to n
g r,rw. s.c.
B VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA
' DESIGU EASIS EARTHQUAKE B-8 M
R.H.R. COMPLEX, WALLS AND SLAB HO lA, ELEVATION:
590'-0" ll5-DB-VW U
s
. _ n,
c__
- __n,
__n,_na.,_.
FERMI UNIT 2
[ Project # t> 13 9-4 0 c.
J.. W.,,..,_.,. -.,
[
EQUIPMENT DYtAMIC d EMD File
.. a a. c m.. J.
n g
- t,1;Qu.
OUALIFICATIOi!
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6
-_..=___..________-m__.,..__
l FERMI NUCLEAR STATICU UI!1T 2 DETROIT EDISci! ColiPANY i
l BALAUCE OF PLA.NT EQUIPNEf1T DYI1AMIC QUALIFICATICil sui', MARY i
EQUIPMENT NAME: P3 mervice Water Pump Ansembly (Pump and Motor) 1 EQUIPMENT NO. : R3000cu05/c006/c007/C098 SPEC. NO,: DECO 3071 -134 LOCATION: PJiR Craplex Elevation 590'-0" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
O ACTIVE
[] PASSIVE l
QUALIFICATI0i; DCCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
Mcdonald Engineering Analysis Co. Report #ME-230, dated June 20, 1973.
2.
Coulds Pomps 1;rawing No. N-302276, Rev. H2, Pump Outline Drawing.
i 3.
Detroit Edison File No. S22-189 Pump Assembly Drawing.
l 4
Detroit Edison Speci f ica t ion 3071-134.
5.
Sary,ent & Lundy SL-3147, Rev. 1, 11-15-76, Appendices A and II.
l l
l' I
I MEJIMEDCU5amW3JMEWiMYTAS** MIL" NAE *?I.T*J'">I*JM RWi*miTLNaF42MifLF'aiFlil G%'N*Ga*E&Z451DM*M.6*!F4WS:ihdeMn rgggm's:_' (
e Prepared by:
e d.
L Date: "I 19 -91
] Reviewed by:
Date:
! Approved by:
Date:
o 6---m-----an - - ~~-unn_ o.--n__;,
~ ~ =n
i i
_ m-.-
- m. - - -,- m.
-~_
7-j E
i FERMI UNIT 2
][jODFile Project #61.29-40
. C['deEYO[.IT3V I
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
{
g l
kl
-::N "v asi)4 OUALIFICATI0i!
SUMMARY
! Page 2 of 6 I:
q C H 3C AuO ;'
q
[;
4 feane;sseavanw:se=n zst-wursrei!:awa
-m-r.;m:rer; _;,.e. _,,-- murwsummamasmuencutwmawns,,.nuam) 4 1
i i
QUALIFICATI0il SUMARY i
i l
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
i 8
5 OBE/SSE Seismic Loads 1
1 l
1 l
l 4
j ORIGINAL QUALIFICATI0tl METHOD:
4 m
t A multidegree of freedon modal analysis was performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-11. Type of elements used in analysis were b.re.;.n.
i, I
i Seismic Loads were combined with normal opdrating seismic loada and stresses ;
}
crampared with allo.cobles.
l were fjEQUALIFICATION METHOD:
l The new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in j
original qualification. The additianal stressen due to new more conservative G values wi)) be added to existing actual stresses and j
the resulta were compared with code allownblet..
i
[
t 2
[
(
{
t b
2 i
k l
l 1,
i i
--w --w mn wwerve w w.
.-rvee=,---_
=
~
= _
I M
b-
[MMk
).
-,,. -. - - - - -,.- + Ja M
N d-
'l
-T @ $
1, Project 96139-40 h
,4 FERMI Ui!IT 2 n
e, - m ~ 7.m,. L m. a.!
J EQU PI'ENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
[i
, 7.~
- t.. u., m a,
ll Page 3 of 6 s
d
_; = o.u...i e QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
m g
- )
cmeme 4
a 4
J N.simonste414tdweGIrNN.%uimuwaswur4vi3w masts avshc.xsgs%wtasir?AN9%w mmL imt<*a%eutse v e
I I
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PL10!T NAME:
FI'RMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR @C 3.
A/E:
Det/ cit Edison /Sargent & Lundy l
I I
II.
CO?!POMENT M?d!E:
Diesel Generator Service Water Pump Assemblies i
l l
1.
S' ope:
C "SS'
[X"l BOP 50 HP, 1760 RPM VSS 3
2.
Model Nur.ber: 8x12.ntc-2 STCfHT TI,_LENct..)
Quantity:
4 3.
Vendor: coulds Punpa, A M I M M M pga.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and rcodel ':o.
of the devices included:n/a i
5.
Physical Description Api,carance: Vertical Turbin.c_h tp__ _
r Mo mt,d to a vert ical mot or -ia a complinr.
4990 lbs v 11 313"_fgjg Weight : total weC Dimensions: 43'-l1 5/8" (lon *)
6.
Location: Building: UHR Comple:
Elev. : s90 '_o" i
7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
[R} Bolting: Number:
4 Size: 7/8"O O Welding: Weld Tyep:
[
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
0 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
i 4
Lateral
- M, 4. 3 4, 12_. 7 7. 14. 2 4 E. 7 4 H z.
Vertical:
>33 Itz i
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test
[{l Analysin C Other 10.
a.
System in which located:
D.G.
i I
4 b.
Functional description: -Ma+.nta+.n-F>erv-iee--Wa ter-t empe ra tti r e to the Emer.
D.G.
systcm i
l C.
Equipment required for:
f f
C Ilot Standby U] Cold Shutdown M Post LC,CA
- a
-v*~
p v--ye--w-y.w--w yw-wwv
-g-wm,,__
--;--me,-,
-p-g-- - - -
--My--w-eqws--r-----~'e P+--=rh
- -e----w--wT-m-r
- - -a-.~ ~...~mme nnumm,,nr.,~.-_
---,m FERMI UNIT 2 Project #G139-<;0 i
S!T:GEDT& LLODY
?
EQUIPMENT DYt1AfilC
{EMDFilei;
- N m m: 2.N L :
OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
4 Page 4 ef 6 j
g
[
c % c ac.c.
__a_-.
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications: Deco 3071-114 III.
IS EOUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLAUT: @ Yes O No IV.
EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test 11 Analysis O Combination of Test q
and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report
" Seismic Stress Analysir, of ASSIE Section III Class 3 a.
'l,itle : Puons" MDIXIT She 8~
! ? Efr--?
b.
Number and Date: ME-230 Juno 20 1975 2.
Company that prepared report: Mcdonald Enrineerine Analysis Co.
3.
Company that reviewed report:The Detroit FS son Cononny V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Leads considered: @ Seismic only O Hydrodynamic only O Seismic and nydrodynamic Other (Specify):_
O 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
SL-3147, Rev. 1, 11-15-76, A-6. A-7. B-6. B 4 11 - 1 0 3.
Method of combining Requiring Responso Spectra:
Absolute Sum SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : 1%
Basis for damping:peu cniao 131 l
Emerg. (SSE): :p 5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required) :
0 ZPA Other (Specify) :
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=_
V=
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O yes Describe loads and how they were treated an overall qualification program:
@ No l
i l
' ew%aneew - --
.2r--
_ -- -M@mM- - -
-n-,-
- ^ Instwer*:wMtw 9
'l FhMI UNIT 2
[i Project a6139-40 f
m,w.y i (J,.. -,f p
p 4
a,,, ;
j em,J*
j EQUIPMENT DYNAfilC ij EMD File #
y t,j c
......._....,d h
[
T *.$2bA )'
OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
l1} Page 5 of 6
{
)
4 9
IDyf.-- -e_xMS-- mtsn;:arUmanuivnes.wtoasser.wst.*marms.rreen%kesazuss- --- -a w> utar.M VI.
IF QUALIFICIsTION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: INA i
1.
Test Method:
O Single f requenc,y :
O Multiele frequency:
i 2.
Input Motion: O Singio axis O Multi axis O
3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg.(SSE) i 4.
Frequency range:
4 1
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
s No O Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Labcaratory mounting:
O Bolting:
Number:
Size i
O Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 0
8.
Functional operability verified:
0 Yes O No O Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis i
l U Static analysis Static coefficient analysis O Dynamic analysis:
@ Response spectrum l
l Tirac history 2.
Model type:
l C 1-dimensional l
E] 2-dimensional O 3-dimensional t
... _, - _ _ - _, ~. _ - -. _ _ _.
i l
i 7
=mm rz.
m_,.._
s =c_wr.m_m o n =- - = n---r=::= u..
-- r:r.-.
) _'
[!-
t FERMI UNIT 2 li Project #6139-40 l <;:
w_ - ~a u,. Jpo,m, 3 p - - 2 r
rr-r y
g
- t. -
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC i
EMD File #
h
- rea w na : U d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
L Page 6 of 6 ll y
c me -c.o 3
Cx_m.n.m-m.u mummzuwanna unw,~nw-==mmt.x=wn ermnard 3.
Method of analysis:
i
@ Computer-aided calculation praarams used: IC.'s-S1RUDL II C Hand calculctions O
4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
y Yes
[ No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
- See Comments.
i Calc Allow 1
Element Stress Stress t
Maximum Column Stress, PSI 7,586 24,750 Max. Column Flange Stress, PSI 13,liF 28,875 Bolt Stress, PSI 24,320 27,500 Max. Pump Flange Stress, PSI 2,694 23.100 Bolt Stress, PSI 9,496 27,500 t
aax. Pump Casing Stress, PSI 1,688 34,000 I
"ax. ", haft Stress, PSI 7,709 l
30,000 Motor dold Down Bolt Stress, PdI Tensile 133 ft 27,500 Shear 488 13.730 Shaft Key Stress, PSI 4,000 10,000 j
i Nozzle Stress, PSI 14,550 24,750 l
Nozzle Flange Equivalent Pressure. PSIG 237 275 l'
Anchor Bolt Stress, PSI l
Tensile 10,578 22,000 Snear 2,139 13,000
)
Discharge Head !!old Down Bolts Tensile 11,003 27,500 Shear 1,913 13,750 Discharge llend Stress, PSI 4,010 24,750 1
1 Discharge Henil Flange Stress, PSI 7,326
? 8,8'/ 5 i
Discharge IIend L' eld Stress, PSI 6,104 16,500 k-1 i
(=m,
- w.,.. - -
. uz-r-nz.=r-
-s w.
- - ~ ~
n
.=, i
=====~2--~--.
y' j:
FERMI UillT 2 d Project #6139-40
+
- r. '.. * ~m~ m a r r a
t,
.: c.'.101 i a R... 'pt ECU1PMEf1T DYt1AMIC l
i,
!l EMD File o
m = =.u. ;
n a
emewoo CUALIFICATIOf1
SUMMARY
f Page 620f 6 L'
s I [gr smacumu.eur.amatwp tma.mveneluptmar2=W2WATsswT:rir%WLmmi: mm44=sresr"Innut:2s3.= Yqrtrc2;:?;j NJ.
Method of analysis:
O Computcr-aided calculation prograras used:
O lland calculations O
Ilave equipment supports been adequate.ty considered in analysis:
O Yes
[ No 1.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
N Calc Allow Element Stress Stresu 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) 1 Calc Allow Element Stress Stress Shaft Deflection, Inches
.035
.05 Impeller Deflection (clearance), Inches
.00001
.009 VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
OllE h SSE Values; OBE values in general are bounding.
y------em
_-4
._._4
- + -,
j CLIENT DETROIT EDYSDR1 j
AME ^
rp e n
PROJECT JP'Tcn ren"T bhn o== ~I Gd LUid'Mr
- ~
st-3147 itG! ld
~
DESIGN BY CLM Rw. 1
- 11-15-76 p
i!!NGIN C FI A 3 -
CHECKED BY SGM 4
/y
\\}
1
/.
a t v. w o.
i j
l ll on:
.,..i l
IMITIAtl 8.* 5 l f
I frowncy. CPS 30 Il ~
E 10 is II 10 LS
.s
' ' ' '. no
'i' nog a P
tic -
co i
l l
j l
l l
l
_ 2u me t-*,,;
E o
u_
i i
I !I I
~ u h
I I
M l
l l[
i u
u l
i i
5.0 l
l l
1 l
l l
llll.
~
5.0 a
o lj i
i a
La 4
E l
i i
)
i la it
~
2 D
i I
m
_ a n
l j
l 71% DAMPING s
'. P7 ts 2% DAMPING
~
15
~
l l
5% DAMPING j j
~
G/i i
H
~
l A
,/ 10% DAMPING i ;
i a
t s
i v t / / n., v m..,v,-
r-4 i
8 g
_[
,/ h / // '
'.~
.r L
I
+
g 4
>p
_ g x
, f Ay 5
1 I
/
N / //'
i i i i
1
',d l
\\ } //
N\\
l I
i l ll l l
1
(
3 I
IlIl I
dh 3
f
/
N
.4 D
E Jr' i '!
- L l
! !~
i i-
.N I!
/
l_q.
l A
t 3
~
l l
l\\ ',
_.1, h
l
(
l g
l-
'i i
.NN v.
-1 * *
- 3, e
t NN 1 i..
i.
i i
NNg
(
i; i
e i
I t I
I i
i
- i X
.c.
I
, > l
> ! ' ! '.Il '.: ! -
,. ! ' d.3
.a
!'e I
4 I
I e
i!
t ir n
.3
.3 4
a a
to ts a
f
.c:
.o
.c4
.e
.a
.o
.i
.ts L'
ec4 s.r.
..A 1
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA L
DESIGN Ha. SIS EARTHQUAKE ElC@ll Q.
R.H.R. C0"PLE"(, NORTH-SOUTH
.J A-6 U
CO';F0;2;.'?
SU.B NO. 1 L EVATION:
590'-0"
CLIENT DEC.0IT EDISON R
I AN_.
... ^
' ' " ^
/
PROJECT EN3TCO FERMI Ll v/r m a e-..IiD d I $ { r i a' q
Uld DES!GN SY CLM
- 11-15-76 iCNGINEZERSJ CHECKED BY SGM i
- i.c l
l l
l l
q v.
o.
l
.u.
i i
i 3
iwmus
- u. s I i
j i
freewerer. CP5.
w 31 T,
M 10 11 Z2 10
.S
.. _ n,
...i.,.i.....x.
....g
~
g, ;.
l l
l a
m
,. 2_ i....
._. 4 j
,1,--
. l l
u, u
i
.i 28 n:p l
4 i
i i
m u
.i to i
i tc'_
m
_T i
il to i
i f
- ^
.g, ic[
!q u
-l% D!aiPII:0 I
2% DAEPII!G
!l i
k
~
~
u u
D..
- 3.,
M if ITA 2Is DIQ'28.'G i, i
{
t
_t
/
I 1,
1, i
i i
1 i
i il i j p i
e,.( _
i Q
U_
/
i l
h ",
O 5
//
Yk l
e 4
U, 794/
/\\ \\ \\ \\
6 4
l
'r i
/ 7/ /
r\\\\N N i
i d'
i J
{
t i
/
// /,
' s _'\\
N N N i
i i i
I
/
// /
\\.(
\\\\ \\
?
l i
i I I/
/[/
\\. \\ \\\\\\'
- I i
y$
i
.f
\\\\
\\.
l l.;
-.j j
,f j_j d
l 1
i e
li!
i r
ii 1
3 j
- i a
g
~
1 i
i 2
[
I a
1 i L E
l i'
.3
.D i
i I
i i
j i
',[]
i 8
xo x 4 13 3
\\%\\d b
x NW V
.m I7 F
i i.
i t
\\\\, ___,
U l
1 I
l i
!, [_;i. l.
,i.
.,,,l.,..i I, ! l.1,
i \\\\ (a
.a}
.32
.O
.M
.25
.06 08
.I
.D
.2
.3 4
.5 6
s
.Q
,: o t.i HORIZ0hTAL FLOCR RESPONSE SPEC:TRA DESIGli EASIS EAP.THQUAKE
~ gbg g R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST A-7 3
COMPO!1Eh?
SLA3 NO. 1, J
ELEVATION:
590!-0"
CLIENT M P?,TT EDIFOM APPENDIX 3 Ij il SL-3147 g
PROJECT 7'::Tc0 eE "T p;.yv'd di3 I (e$1 f.l.J & J '
. rm -
g,3 u RW. 1, 11-M d us DES!GN BY CL*4 IONQlNTMZ Asi CHECKED BY SGI4 t t v. N O.
l I I
l f
q DATI ls : -I t 7.]
l l
=
(,
I N if l A L 5 'r< < 5l l
l l
8 fretuency. CPS
%)
11 PJ 10 10 11 10 10
.5 go-_....
.,.,..........g....
l.
1
.y I,j f
. '.2 J
LO t
l i :
i I
~l:
i I
i i
w.o --
i; o
j g
to el i
i LT
~ - ~
L l
l 1 i l
.u so
_1 i
a l
p I
l l
I l
! lll 1c se 1
to i
I i
I i i i
d i
I i
l I
l t I
3 15 l
I 3
le n
J l
3 r..
la-to I
j ll
.i
- y..(-
i r
i
- ,I
!.i
-t l
L5 l
3 l
l d
b.
l i
i i
i i
i
_u to il i
i i
- d a
s i
i i
i.
x i
i i
i d
-1% DAFPIN0 l
q{
f
[ '.'
l
- 7 -2% D.w
- PI?,,G 3 3 5
I I
~;, j c
~
3 I
/..
/
-5% DAIIPING
)
i.
/
__, 'i f 10% DAIIPII.'G i!
3
.{
6.
_ /.
__/
r NEW 2% DAMPT'lG! I 1
/
d l
f 3
,3
/
N
/,
l
/
d g f..
l l,
- /'
M f.
- i i
i f
/
i E --
d
/
/
s n
^
/
s i
i 1
I d
l;
~..
/
i I
~2
/:
~ li i
! i 8
\\
2, j
I i.
i
'j
/
-1,
M' s
N'!q 47 s
M.l
!c 6
H 3
ik \\
\\
fI I
i I,,.,i,l,!,
....l
.,,,l
, \\. \\ '\\.,. I.\\
- Y l
f, l
)
.4
.O
.D4
.C5
.t.
'a
.1
.L5
.2
.3 4
5
.4
.8 L0 LS 13 53 tetkt Sec.
Fyi 13 VERPICAI, P.ESPCilSF. SPECTRA O
DI'3IG;! 1%315 2/J'T',:C'UAKE L-3
,. m,,,
O CLIENT DETROI':' EDISON APPDmiX 3 si SL-3147 PROJECTE::RICO FER'II hitb-{Kl.jIJt.Jp [ j s n2'*Y n r a.
r Rev. 1, 11 '3-76 DESIGN BY Ct.M I'd. (.
y QNGIN:ICR!3 -
CHECKED BYSGM
- l. '
I i
l i
tiv. w o.
13 ou y..s a i
i
_tw Ts u,l< x.5 l l
l l
a temem. us r
J 31 23 to 10
.11 f.0 LO J
_ z-6,l,..i.
I
...l.
i l-
.y.
.l a
\\
6 i
a ;5 :
.o r -
i 1
J r
I l
l l
l l
-4 l
u 3
i r,
i seg i
,r i
i i
_i
, ) (.
i p
i
- o
)
{
i j
i l
! { l!
-r t
3 i
l l
l t
l l
l l
l ll 1.
3.0 l
l1fiDAI~ PING 1
,3 i
6 3,"
~
I
! [
. 272 DAMPII:G J
5% DAMPING i
1
)i j
,105 DAMPING
'J
[ ' I/.
MED 2% DA'4 PING i
g g
l l
l l
U 3
)
- s i
-e o
i j
3 1
I l
l l
I d..
'I r:'
'8
- / /
-\\ g ;
f j
.f y
i
/. /i/'
~~\\\\\\.
-,i s.1
'k
/ i//
, __.L._
T \\\\
- /
//
/
\\.\\u
.i 1 P i
g 7
i i
-14
\\ \\\\
b
/
N /
4 i
i
- i I I
f!
4 :s:
/ // /! /-~
~
x \\ \\\\.
i l
'ij
- 1
,d i
i i
i it
.r i
l l
j 3
/
j w
/
I i
5 I
k l
i
.\\ \\
l i
l' W
s
)
j l
N X ___N N
e c_.
__. i N. A _ \\ 1_ _. '
.2 A \\ \\ _\\
i u
_\\ '\\ \\
I ii i
e',
i!.'.l,I...,!....i.,.,l.,..I,I b M\\l C,
d U
,3.,
Im
~
.=
.e
.u
.n
.i u
=
rua. s.<.
L' - )
Ok VERTICAL RESPONSE ~;PECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTiiO.UAKE
.c 11 U..~ " - "
~~oa H. H. R. C O M E L F"<.
n SL4B NO. 13, Ei *:NATIOM:
5908-0"
CLIENT
' OE'" POTT ' EnTr?"T APPENDIX 3 p.~
PROJECT r"n Tco ::o rT SL-3147 d
dpnn-n - ep a DitiCiC)tGfgJ:tJy1/
a. 1. 11 a ossion 3y csx
> SNGIN CIM AG CHECKED BY SGM
%. ' 'f '
E t V. N O.
i l
I DAff J s s' 74 l
lHITIALS < d.1 I I
l
. frequency, CP$
I '-
'hij'
'I'i'''j'!
ne_ >'
ll I
-j
~
l
~
i 2:
6 a,
iu _
e l
l i
p i
i mo _
4 i
I; u
~
j a
i
- 1i l i.lIl
~~
T l
l i
i i
i I
i illi f.
I 3'-
4,0 j'! l ll i
l i
I 1
l 2
i
~
a I
i
~~
191 DAMPI!!G 2% DAMPI?!G i
l 1
~
\\
[l Y
\\
-55 DAMPI?G k
[ 10% DAhPI!!G
- 'l I
l S
(('
>mw ? = min > rvm u
I
/
/ d:
i i
[
3, I
.,,/
r 3
4..
p I
/.
\\
\\
y gy
\\_
1 t
j/
f x
x x-
't i
/
\\'
1\\
\\
! i
,t 1
{ ,
/~
/i
\\
\\\\
\\ i i
i i
i1
-l{
l l
",i j ~
ll -
/-
?
x\\\\ \\
i
-cu
=a l l q
x r
.3 i
.I I
i 2
5 1
1
/
i g
l j
D
\\.-
i
'!.I l
i i
s i
.n N.
i g
L l
4..
t
.i
+
n b
, i x
ws x
t i\\
\\\\ _
\\
\\
1.
i i; i
i i
i N
~x
\\
S t
i l
I
\\
I i.
i t u;!_.,
,l.. I,.., !....'!.,, i !,1.ul
! \\ ' \\,
\\
,3 I
1
,3
.le,
.a
.c
.a
.cs
.c.
.m
.i
.ts
.2
.s 4
5
.a to u
u
,,,x s.
<s, VEFCICAL RESP 0i!SE SPECTRA DESIGN ~EASIS EART.;!OUAKE
.R.H.R.
COMPLr.X
- r. in q
SIA o sw..t u, not.v.urION:
5908-O "
11.7 D3 'JS L2
l
\\
=---n-
_h FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGEDT&l.UCDY h
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
f g%7[7 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME:
RHR C00Llm TU..ER E1156B001A E1156B002A EQUIPMENT NO. :
SPEC. NO.:
3071-93 E1156B001B E1156B002D LOCATION:
RHR Complex (Top of Cooling Tower - Elev. 637'6")
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
O ACTIVE PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
S&L Fermi-2 Drawings:
M-6 Rev. C Dated 1-11-80 M-7 Rec. E Dated 3-13-81 M-8 Rev. B Dated 7-12-78 t
M-9 Rev. B Dated 7-12-78 M-10 Rev. D Dated 8-22-78 M-11 Rev. C Dated 3-13-81 i
2.
IMD File #011785, Enrico Fermi Atomic Pc,ser Plant, Unit #2, Residual Heat Removal Service Water System Cooling Tower Component Design Crit.eria and Derign Calculations, Dated February 8, 1974 by the Marley Co.
3.
Westinghouse Drawing No. KC-67605, Sh.
1, Dated 3/4/73; Sh. 2, Dated 2/12/74.
4.
Marley Company Drawings Nos: SD 72-4361 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 SD 72-4362 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 SD 72-4363 Rev. C Dated 5/17/74 73-41173 Dated 4/18/73 74-452 Rev. A Dated 7/17/74 74-453 Rev. A Dated 5/17/74 74-455 Rev. A Dated 5/17/74 74-4843 Dated 2/11/74 5.
S&L Report #2682, Dated 9/27/74.
Prepared by:
86 b*
Date: 7 - N ~~ b l Reviewed by:
Date:
Approved by:
Date:
I l
g
j FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SACOEUTEtI.UCDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
f
$9$7 7 )
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 l
l J
=
QUALIFICATI0fl
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
1.
Tornado Loads, dead loads, operating loads.
2.
Seismic loads, dead loads, operating loads.
ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
The original qualification of this equipment consisted of the analysis of the various subsystems of the equipment. The subsystems analyzed were:
Spray System; Fill System; Eliminators; Fill and Eliminator retainers; Equipment Supports.
Natural frequencies and damping values for the ACB Fill Bundle were determined by testing. Natural frequency and damping values for the Belgium Wave Eliminator were determined by testing.
All mechanical equipment was assumed to be rigid. Piping and concrete beam supports were analyzed using a response spectrum i
dynamic analysis. The motor supports, pipe supports and mist and eliminator retainers were considered in the analysis.
In all cases where tornado loade were applicable the tornade loads were much higher than the seismic loads and the tornado loads were used in the ana]ysis.
l l
I
[
l Y_
I
- a l
f Project #6139-40 p-N FERMI UNIT 2 l.
1 SARGEDT&zi Uf)Dy j
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC f.EMDFile#
aNENaana d
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 cmc co g QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR O 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NPIE:
RHR Cooling Tower 1.
Scope:
Model Number:
Not Applicable Quantity:
4 3.
Vendor:
Marley Co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
Not Applicable 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
Fan s, motors, niping i
contained in a concrete structure
- _aee Dimensions: Approx. 73'6" x 45' Weight: Attachment A 6.
Location: Building: RHR Complex Elev.: _637'6" Top gf Cooling Tower 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
Motor - 3/4" Dia.
Motor - 4 Size:_Fa n
- 1" Dja.
[3] Bolting : Number: Pan
-3 O weldin9: weld TveP:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
Ricid Side to side :
5.86 Hz (Cross-Beam)
Vertical:
9.49 Hz (Cross-Beam) 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
X Laboratory Test O Analysis O Other System in which located:
RHR 10.
a.
b.
Functional description:
Reautred far removine resianal heat from the service water system.
c.
Equipment required for:
Hot Standby x Cold Shutdown
@ Post LOCA
~* Concrete structure is part of the RHR complex and not included in this qualificat n.
3 FERMI UNIT 2'
, Project #6139-40 l EMD File #
j SARGEIITklufjDY i
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC l
UNGINRER"-
I OUALIF1 CAT 10N
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C >d iC AG O 11.
Pertinent reference desigt specifications:
3071_93 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes [ No IV.
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD: O Test O Analysis Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit #2 Residual Heat a.
Title:
Removal Service Water System Cooline Tower Design Criteria b.
h, umber and Datbn Calculations and Desi EMD File 4011785 Dated 1-16 78 2.
Company that prepared report: The Marlev Co.
3.
Company that reviewed report: Sarnent & Lundy V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: O Seismic only O nydrodynamic only Seismic and Hydrodynamic
/
Other (Specif y) : Tornado loads.
O Seismic loads 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
A-6, A-7, A-8, A-9., B-8, B-11 of SL-3147 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
[X3 Absolute Sum O SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) :
Basis for damping: Rec. Guide Emerg. (SSE) :
1.61 and Testing
- 5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
l 0 ZPA Other (Specify):
Upset (OBE) : F/Br S/S=
V=
l Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= _
S/S=
V=
6.
Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
@ No 1
- Response Spectrum Dynamic Analyses were performed.
~
I
{l t
FERMI UNIT 2 j, Project #6139-40 SADGEUT&LUDDV i
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC IEMDFile#
iamoincuac csic^oo y QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 t
ime VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
[] Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Mation: [] Single axis Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/U:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting:
Number:
Size t
Welding:
Weld type:_
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
[] Yes
[] No
[] Not applicable l
9.
Test results including modifications made:
l 10.
Other tests performed: -
VIl.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis l
UUStatic analysis Static coefficient analysis l
X Dynamic analysis:
M Responso spectrum Time history 2.
Model type:
@C1-dimensional 2-dimensional
[] 3-dimensional
~
-mm B
(
l Il L
FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40 l
SARGEfjT&LUE]DY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC I
EMD File #
icuarnurais.
I c-ic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 m.
3.
Method of analysis:
N Computer-aided calculation-programs used:
@ Hand. calculations I
4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
x Yes No 5.
Stress evaluatien at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress 1.
Fill hetainer Bolt Shear Stress 8.22 Ksi 14.40 Ksi 2.
Fill Retainer Angle Bending Stress 4.87 Ksi 24.00 Ksi 3.
Eliminator Reatiner Bending Stress 19.35 Ksi 24.00 Ksi 4.
Eliminator Retainer Bolt Tension 23.10 Ksi 26.60 Ksi 5.
Geareducer Anchor Bolt Tension 17.28 Ksi 26.60 Ksi 6.
Motor Anchor Bolt Shear
.58 Ksi 13.30 Ksi 7.
Branch Arm Pipe Support Anchor 7.18 Ksi 13.30 Ksi "0.1t Sheara 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress 1)
No Critical Deflections VIII.
ADDITIONAL COFDiENTS :
No comments.
-t e
1 l
a
lf FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Y ATTACHMENT A WEIGHTS OF COOLING TOWER COMPONENTS 1)
- 36 Geareducer' 3,150 Lb.
- 2) 240" Dia. Fan 1,913 Lb.
3) 150 H.P. Motor 2,510 Lb.
- 4) Drive Shaft 142 Lb.
5)
Fill 240,000 Lb. (Wet)
- 6) Eliminators 39,000 Lb. (Wet) t I
l
-t t
2 e
l i
CLIENT D M n tran
- N^
i PROJECT"='P^'T cn ree'n SL-3147 g
r9 9 "C'.
k r parta.] g g DESIGN BY C D'
,R?.v. 1, 11-15-76
~
c Ji3
'CNCINenas CHECKED BY SGM L s t V. N O.
f l
l t.
[
D AT :
l c.c.
1 INITI Att l< a 5
(
l l
l I
Fregary. CPS k
+
f
, 50 33 20 as 10 13 2.0 LO 5
a 6
i
- no
- '****+*' +i i
- 1
~
(
'a+',
- =,
g I
8 a
a s '
- 210. * **'
11 0 '
ii, l
~.
l tic ~
I l
i l
i 1
.I _ _ _,
t
-- 110 t
i t
Ido -
i l
I t_....
i i
l 10 -
g l
.I i
- 10 i
6 j
1 ;
l l
j
-'LG j
-1
~
e l
i I
LO 5
i 5.0 1
I 10
~
~
l
. (3 f
40 -
g i
l I
10
~
s 10 ~
j 2.0 20 _
1% DAMPING
~
L5 i
l g
!2% DAMPII:G i
3 ts l
I lO@ DAMPING 5
I p DAMPING l
,f Lo
/A7j
, tc 1
t i
.////
I i
- "{
i
,t.
X
////
i i
i i i
,t
+
i i
/
N / //
i -
l !l
,1-i //
N 7-//
i i
x NI I
lll l
~ [, j f
l ,
- /.
x 1
i li
/
R MHH i ',
lli N.'
5 I
E
(;
i l
.. ~
~
'y l
- g._
~.. /--
n
.f j.,
l L.
[/
l l
3 i r
i t
.ts l
.ts-I t1 J
.x x \\ -
- M 3
i N N 'k 10 -
{
' I 2
e NNg l
i i
i r=g i
l
- i W;
,,,,l
,l, l,
.,!,,,,l.,i,
,.,,l, I.I,I,
.,,. I N "ih, i
I I
i
.at
.as
.m
.e
.m
.es
.i
.is
.2
.3 4
5
.s to ts 2.0
~
enw. sr Q
. HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE A-6 R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH Q
COMPONENP SLAB NO. 1
- U ELEVA' TION
590'-0"
~
CLIEffT UPY@hY Y.mrscw A
PROJECT ENRTCO ' ?R'4I SAFER & LU. DY 0
DESIGN BY C L. i
,,R:v. 1, 11-15-76 iUNGINIICRC" CHECKED BY SGM l
I f
E t Y. NO.
l D AT I IJ *4 7d i
INITIAL 5 I %. r. 5 l frequerwy. CPS 50 33 20 10 1C 13 10 10 5
'- 210 8 i ''
*iii***''
'a:
240 _
l I
5'
'~
t 15.0 p
150 _
T--
l, i
I l
i
_ no t '
, i 6-i-
m0..
i y
j
_ to I
10 _
i
~
{
-- v ---
b
- j.0 to
-l% DAMPING l!
2 u
~
I 2% DAMPING (o
a DA u
//
10 i
[
i,
__f\\
~~
1, i
i ;il W i
i i
!il i
1, t,
l 5
.,/
3 i
i
,i,
-i "
'#/
/\\_\\ \\
't i{
// /
p\\\\\\
l I
i e
G i
e d'
i i
ii i
i U
{
i y/ f
' 1_\\ N \\
I i
I i,i
?
I j///
\\\\
\\\\
-j!
?
{.!j i
- /
-\\ N NK 1
i i i t
{
~
I i
i
' /l N V X illl
[,
g l
~
p f
,D
.D,
i l
n I
y i
i 4u xw i..
i i
\\ \\k d
g -
f t
y a
i
\\\\
i 3
i i
i f
U.
a l
i
- l l
,,,el, I
i e
i e
i,e 1,3
~
n v,
,,,,t e
e e r r,,,
'ree
.r
.82
.03
.04
.05
.06
.08
.1
.5
.2
.3 4
5
.i
.8 LO L5 10 3
ruie, sx.
U HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESION BASIS EARTHQUAKE b if [JE 7 LAB.10.
1, ELEVATION:
590'-0"
CLIENT DETROIT EDISC!'
l' APPENDIX A 3
PRWECU"uMO M 3t_31g SAslGEOT&LUODY DES!GN BY CE.
Rev. 1, 11-15-76 13N:2INUDADb CHECKED BY SGM a
l Elv. No.
1 l
q O Al t s o.3(. 74 I
INITIALS
<M.5l I
i Frequency. CPS i
50
))
20 10 10 13 2.0
'10 5
5 g
']
- M0 ii'''''
i8 **
T M0.
i.
I
^
15.0 110
=
h e
l 1
l i
Y 11 0 n
i i
i
~
E0
[
ltLO _
,, j LO
~
LC-gg m
l ls t
l' l
10 l
l l
ll,
~
10
-1 DAMPING
~
.ll
- 1 l
-[7 l
18 2
DAMPING 3
-5% DAMPING l' _
l[10% DAMPING y
_ to 2.0 b
~
L5 1
/,
15 i,
2 i
!/IX
- u i
t0
- / /i :
/ \\\\
i
-,s m
e 6
e i
i t
- 1/, ~ p i \\\\
i i
l i
i i i
/
l\\ \\(
i i
i i
l i i 7
i u
i\\\\N i
'~
t i
/
( \\ NN i
i I Iil
- {
i l
I ///,
NQ NN I
III
-,i j
'~
i I
l f/
i NNNii i
g 5
b
/
l l
]
.2 l'
D i
l
'A i
-, m i
- xx w i
NN W i i e i i
i j
y i
i i
i t
i i I
NN\\\\
3 -
i g\\\\
i I
]
i I ':
i
,,,,l,Ii el.,,,!.,,
.ls l,
,,,.I,M, i i,
.or 03
.m
.05
.06
.Os
.i
.ts
.2
.)
4 5
.a to u
to 3
l ruu su.
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA l
DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX, NORTH-SOUTH A-S i
COMPONENT SLAB NO. 2 ELEVATION:
6178-O"
CLIENT D5TRTIT ED13UN APPENDIX A
"" "E "'
SimG20]T$ LUPjDY
.St-3147 DESIGN BY_ CLM R:v. 1, 11-15-76 icNO:NGEAS CHECKED E/
SGM l
l
~2 EY. N o.
8 t, AT E
- 8; #d l
IN4flALS 4 % $
poency. ces r3 33 2D 30 10 1)
,10 10
.5
..g y,,o i
e i
a i...
iia e ii...i i
he i4 ii,
~
j}*
-+ -
tio t-- -
4-iso _
i l-I i
i l
e i
I i;
i a
a no tao ij
~
Lo -
~
i
[o DAMPING i
ij
~ T-~
g 2% DAMPING
't I Il
~
l
}
l l
l l.. [ M 5%~ DAMPING u
)
u 10 j
10% DAMPII'G
=
f7 o
i
, 7 y
j l
/
A i
i 7,
I i
UJ to i
i I
I i
W /,
i u
e t,
l
{
i i
1 i
i u
E' ii
/:r M W
!i to j
i ii i
i
/_
\\\\_\\\\
i
=
i l
i
//
\\\\\\\\
i i
I..
\\h \\\\ '
i l
I
- [
h
]
.3 -
4
'5-l MANI I
E If.
i\\
M i
4
.3
.s r.
I S
i I
l l
!,'.a F
l u
1 l
L u
l x x 13 i
}
l l
'l
- h j.cs
\\
.Os l
I i
i i
i
?
l iI 06
.06
,l,!.
~
a t t
,ee' e
e
+
t t
?.,t,
..i,,
et,
.02
.O 04
.05 06
.et
.I
.15
.2
.3 4
5
.6
.8 LO L5 10
,g Feriod. Sec.
HORIZWTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA 0
DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE 1
g R.H.R. COMPLEX, EAST - WEST g_9 b
COMPONENT SIAB NO. 2 Final ELEVATION:
6178-O" P
CLIENT _ t'ro0TT FDT.SOM Appf,391x 3 n-3 "
"Ecu mo m R.v. 1, 11-15-76 SEEHa!.00By DES!GN BY CLM i
CNCINCnt:m CHECKED BY SGM t
R E v. N o. l t
l l
l I
l DATI lN-8d N I
l l
_l g
5l I
l l
l lH lTI A L 5 'rt x
Frequency, CPS T
So 33 20 to 10 15 to 10 5
1
.g..
j go m,_....
I 1
!I 3,
2 ts.o J
15.e _
l l
I i
i
- IM r
j j 1-i, t
140 _
, 18 i
i i
j i
L* -
t i
I~
l
- i i
to
--i
,I l
50 u
i 5.0
- i. l l
l I.
l.
e
+
]
l l li a,
i i
j f
1.
1 i
]
9 1
i
'O J
2.0
'i i
i l
l i
L5 u
i i
l i
l l
i i
L'
,i i
i d
s i
l d
>i i
i i
i i
- '3 {
J i
i d
4
[
?.
i i
i i
i t
-1% DAMPING l i l
- 7 -2% DAMPING g ',
i
)
1 i
l I
/[ -55 DAMPING i., l) i J
I 5
>[e 10fo DAMPING 1
3 e
l l
l i
I
'3 3
/
x r/
i
/
j I
!/
!/
[1
/
i i
l
'15
./
/
l l
i
'd
/
/
-/
6
[I i
/
x 1
bl X
}
l
[l
(
.to j
/
.m 4"
m.N
\\\\
i i
i i
-l '
, i i
NN NN d' r i
I i
i i
l\\A \\\\
[,,,,l,..,I,l,
,,1,!,,,,,,,.I...,,,,,1,1 \\ M I..<
... [es
.m
.5
.as
.e.
.i a
a a
u a
u
- Q Pgfbi, $ec.
. VERTICAL RESPCNSE SPECTRA
' DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE g_3 D-R.H.R. COMPLEX, WA LLS AND aLAB EO. 1A^. ELO/ATION:
590'-c" 115-on-v" n
i I
CLIENT DE9 0T "' EJISOM APPENDIX E SL-3147 J
PROJECT E ICO FEPMI g g. g '%"] g {p] "J g jr Rev. 1, 11-15-76
]
DESIGN BY CI M a
IGNGIN3G AS CHECKED BY MM l
f l
E t Y. N O.
Daft
- 0 88 74 l
tNITIALS
<K.5 I
l l
l f requency. cps 2
31 20 10 10 13 10 10 5
g<
_ nD i
i a
>aiis iia a in as i
a a
8
'ai',
i'l*
M0.
y' I
110 i
La tis i
I i
i l
1 l
i 10.0 3
. Ito _
-f--
i 3
tc i
i
_a g
{
j 10,
j i
~
l n
-t l
l to to 6
i 10 5.0
~
l (O
}]
40 ~
l
.t L
8 l
10 u
I 10 -
[
l g
l j
l l
_ to to _
i I
L5
~
Q L5 t-l I
I u
l l
t te to II t
i i i I i
i i
i I
p L,
q i
i i
i i i
j i
i i i
8 ;-
8 i
l k
i i
6 I
N i
j i j
,f
{
^5 I
i l l y
2% DAMPING 1%' DAMPING 5i l
/ -
~
'4 '5 0
3
-5% DAMPING j
j j
l l
l l
((
10% DAMPING 4
i x
r
.x r !
l g
g 4 L_/l !
\\ :/,,
~!-
l y
I /h l
l i
1_ j a x
~'
y 1
}l
\\.T l
i l :
llll
\\!-
x xx I
.10 s
i i
to c
~
x.N NN i
i i
I i
6 i
NN NN i-i l
l l
t I
l\\ r\\' \\ \\
l l
I,
,1,,-,,
.,,,I,,,,
,,,,1,1, N M
...- ;3
.0
.03
.a
.m
.06
.0
.i
.ts
.2
.2 4
5
.6 to ts to l
e.<% s c.
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA 1
- DESIGN EASIS EARTHQUAKE R.H.R. COMPLEX' 118-DB-N B-11 l l WALLS, ELEVATION
617'-0:
e
- - =, -
m
-t FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 L SARGEUTia LUNrTI EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
!. EMD File #
g*yf"g- !
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6
(.',:
i l
l FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME:
Powell 24",
300 lbs. Motor operated Globe Valve EQUIPMENT NO. :
V8-2139, V8-2140 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION: Reactor Building EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
$ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Wm. Powell Co's. Sesimic Analysis Report for a 24",
300 lbs.
globe valve figure 3051 W. E.
with a Limitorgue SMB-4-200 Motor Operator, Report No. S-64048, dated November 21, 1973.
O t
_m,
- _ _j Prepared by: j/cmcWI~ h-M Date:
7-b"O[
g lReviewedby:
Date:
j fApprovedby:
Date:
j 1
__ _. _ _=---
_,____.e
_ _ _ _,,. _.. = -
- 6139-40 l
fProject l
FERMI UNIT 2 CTGEi3TFilliNDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
.EMD Filo #
g9; i
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 g
QUALIFICATI0!l
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS Q0NSIDERED:
Normal + OBE Normal + SSE ORIGINAL Ol'ALIFICATION METHOD:
Hand calculations were performed at critical sections of the valve structure for static loading.
Extended structure was assumed as a cantilever beam with concentrated loads at various locations.
Maximum bending, moment, and corresponding bending stress was calculated for critical sections.
Natural frequency Was calculated based on maximum deflection for an equivalent cantilever beam.
Maximum allowable g's were calculated for
( ',
each critical section.
O
_J
s.
f FERMI Uf11T 2 1
Project #6139-10
)
SAGGEfJTs:1.Uiji1Y d EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
[
EMD File #
l 5
r
= mNmN3mm* J QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 l
Cs cHieroo l t
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
I'. ility :
Detroit Edison Company PWR O 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
24" GLO VALVE 1.
Scope:
2.
Model Number: V8-2139, V8-214 0 Quantity:
3.
Vendor:
Wm. Powell Co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
,,73 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
T-shape 100 in_ high Weight:7375#
Dimensions:
6.
Location: Building: Reactor Elev. : 605 '-11" (21391 58.'-E"T2140) ~
7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
O noltins: :2 umber:
Size:
Q Welding: Weld Tyep: nytt welm ng-full penetratien _.
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
~
8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back.,
n y.,
Side to side :
Vertical:
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Lahoratory Test
@ Analysis Other 10.
a.
System in which located:Res.idual IIcat Remova.), normally b.
Functional description: open, closes by-pass loop of
(;
RIIR llent Ex. to allow shutdown cooling c.
Eq ipment required for:
8 Ilot Standby Q Cold Shutdown Post LOCis 1
\\
=_
7 j
FERMI UtilT 2 i Project #6139-40 i
SARGENTal. UNDY j
E Q U I Pt4 E f4 T D Yll A M I C l EMD File #
~
'DNN N-R QUALIFICATI0tl SU!'f4ARY
!Page4of6 I
C *-1 lC AG O I f
I f
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
Deco Snnc? 3071-501 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: ElYes O No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METEOD:
Test C Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
sninnic Ann 1vnin p o no r t-for a 24"
?00lbs. Globe b.
NumberandEate:sh4049.
aM 11-21-73 2.
Company that prepared repor': Midwest Technical Service,Inc.
3.
Company that reviewed report: The Ralph M.
Parsonn Co.
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: [3 Seismic only 0 nyorodynamic only O Seismic and nydroaynamic i
Other (Specify) :
O 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 3.
Method of com,,bining Requiring Response 'pectra:
Absolute Sum r/A SMS l
4.
Damping Upset (OBE) :
Basis for damping:
N/a Emerg. (SSE) :
5.
Required acceleration in each direction. (if required) :
Accelerations from piping O ZPA X Other (Specify): analysis at valve location Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=_
l 6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
[X] No A
-j FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l
S~onGENT&!.UUfJY ['
l I
i EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
~'
>i 1
cumucane.
\\
c me^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 l
=
j E
i VI.
IF QUALIFICATION-BY TEST, Ti!EN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
N/A O Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis
[] Multi axis O
3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg.(SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No
[] Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting :
Number:
Size Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
[] Yes No
[] Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
l 10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis E] Static analysis
[] Static coef ficient analysis Dynamic analysis:
[] Response spectrum
[] Time history 2.
Model type:
( ;
EDl-dimensional
[32-dimensional
[] 3-dimensional J
t
_ - - =
-.rawel
]
SARGEU~f&LUUDY ti FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40
[
q l
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC I,EMD File #
)
i mrmvuzmn
+
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 csic^oo
{
3.
Method of analysis:
O computer-aided calculation i
programs used:
O iland calculations O
4.
llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
Yes No N/A 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
alc Allows Element Stress Operator / yoke bolting 48.67 g's, 10.27 g' 248.14 g'q Bennet Bennet / body bolting s
Body Neck 103.05 g's b
6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) (stresses are limited to Sm.)
4 c
Allow Element Stress Stress VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
.a e
4
_ - =.
- ~
l FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40
$$UGECI$UR30Y EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
,,EMD l'ilc #
'["*yfi"j QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UllIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYliAMIC 00ALIFICATI0f1
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Powell 4",
600 lbs. Y-Globe Valve with motor operator EQUIPMENT NO. : V8-2196, V8-2232 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION: Reactor Building EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE
@ PASSIVE 2196 2232 hing d Mter QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Wm. Powell Co.'s Seismic Analysis Report for a 4" 600 lbs.
Y-globe valve, Figure 16051-Y W.E. with a limitorque SMB-0-40
(]~
motor operator, Report No. S-65867, dated 1-25-1974.
7//#[/I/
(,)
Prepared by:\\
OM'
[d Date:
g j
Reviewed by:
Date:
] Approved by:
Date:
s w __- - -: -
-4
--___c-_-
.n.
1 0
e d
3 E
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 h
SARGErlT&l. UNDY I
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
,EMD File #
l
$$$27g-QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6
{
l QUALIFICAT10tl
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Normal + OBE Normal + SSE ORIGINAL QUAL l"1 CATION METHOD:
Hand calculations were performed at critical sections of the valve structure for static loading.
Extended structure was assumed as a cantilever beam with concentrated loads at various locations.
Maximum bending moment and corresponding bending stress was calculated for critical sections.
Natural frequency was calculated based on max. deflection for a equivalent cantilever beam.
Maximum allowable g's were calculated for each critical section.
G,,
6 t
= a -- -
~
l FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 g
C S O O C. D C.j D l' EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
.EMD File #
f invencano I
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Pcge 3 of 6 ry L
C. WC AC.O
-n QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF E'0UIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR C 2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR [X]
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edis m/Sarger.t & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
4" Y-Globe Valve 1.
Scope:
C NSSS
[X] BOP 2.
Model Number: V8-2196, V8-2232 Quantity:
2 3.
Vendor:
ym. Powell Co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
Y-shape O
Dimensions:
36" high Weight: 593 lbs.
Elev. 555'6" (2196) 6.
Location: Building:
Reactor
& 575'0" (2232) 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
C Bolting: Number:
Size:
QQWelding: Weld Tyep: Butt welding - full penetration Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
0 8.
Natural frequencies in cach direction:
Front to back:
22 Hz Side to side :
Vertical:
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test
@ Analysis O Other System in which located : RCIC-2232 HDCS-2196.
Normally l 10.
a.
b.
Functional description: clo s e:3. Used for test of RCIC System / Norma 11y closed _topens m i n i mum _f_ low __byg pa S s. lino [
c.
Equipment required for:
I
@ ) iQj t, g gjd b y
[] Cold Shutdown
[3 gog LOCA
(
FEht41 UNIT 2
[ Project #61b9-40 SARGENT&l.UijDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC lEMDFile#
l I
isNOWERR*
QUALI F I C ATi t.:'
SUMMARY
2.Page 4 of 6 E
C H sC AG O i
k
&6 11.
Pertineni reference design specifications:
DECO Spec 3071-501 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: f_] Yes C No IV.
EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION METHOD:
Test
@ Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Otalification Report a.
Title : Seismic Analysis Report for a 4", 600 lbs. Y-globe valve b.
Number and Date: S-65867, dated 1-25-74 2.
Cc.,mpeny that prepared report:_ Midwest'iechnical Service Inc.
3.
Company that reviewed report. The Ralph M. Parsons Co.
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: [X] Seismic only 0 Hydrodynanic only O Seismic and nydrodynamic Other (Specify):
2.
Required response spectra (uttach the graphs):
N/A 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
Absolute Sum N/A SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) :
Basis for damping:
N/A Emerg. (.sE) :
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (i f requ, ired) :
Accelerations from piping analysa,s O ZPA
@ Other (Specify) : at valve locatien Upset (ODE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification progran-C
@ No 1
~
FERMI UNIT 2 Proiect #6139-40 S.MiGEUT&LUDDY l
EQUIPMENT DYNAM1C EMD File #
)
.umua==.;n l
csic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 VI.
IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, TIIEN COMPLETE:
N/A 1.
Test Method:
[] Single frequency:
Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis
[] Multi axis O
3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multipla frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[] No Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg.(SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
{';
[] Bolting:
Number:_
Size Welding:
We3d type:_
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
Yes No
[] Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed VII.
IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, TIIEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis
@9 Static analysis
[] Static coef fimient analysis
[] Dynamic analysis:
[] Response spectrum
[] Time history 2.
Model type:
b] l-di mensional
[] 2-dimen sional
[] 3-dimensional i
j
--w,._--
mannemen I
\\
8 FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 j
SARGENT&LUDDY i
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
,EMD File #
1=;4 cin.m sn csic^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
I Page 6 of 6
- _a_
3.
Method of analysis:
O computer-aided calculation programs used:
(X] Hand calculations O
4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
Yes No N/?$
5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Agow ac Element Stress 9s Operator / yoke bolting 38.7 Yoke Arm 9.4 Bonnet / Body Bolting 7.52 Body Neck 14.05 r..
U 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
(stresses limited to Sm}
ac Allow Element Stres.,
Stress
)
VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l i
i
.2
-q f
l FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40 StJiGEijT&LUi]DY I
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD Filo #
j$Zi"g l
OUALIFICATIOi!
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: 20 in. Wafer Sphere Valve EQUIPMENT NO. :
V21-2015,2016 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 1
VR3-3013,3014,3015,3016 LOCATION:
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE O PASSIVE I
QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
Seismic Qualification of valves covered by Detroit Edison Company Purchase Order No. IE-86782 for the Enrico Fermi Atomic Plant Unit No. 2 and processed under Janesbury Order No. NC-46261, NC-34252 and JPB 73111.
John Henry Associates Report No. JHA-7634, dated August 31, 1977.
l Prepared by: mem t
6 Ped 7-/ 7 Er/
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
~
Approved by:
Date:
A
I, FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGE 01T&LUijDY j
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
I
'E$$$(($[*-
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 l
OUALIFICATI0tl
SUMMARY
T LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
ORIGI!4AL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Finite Element Method was used for static analysis. upset and emergency load combinations were analyzed separately, Critical Stress for various locations was hand calculated using computer run output.
Calculated stresses were found to be within allow-ables.
l l
l D
e 7"'
Project #6139-40 FERMI UNIT 2 r
SAf1GEUT&LU:JDy [
iaVIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
ENWN&mma a LUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6
(
c o-oc ^oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT 1.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 T2PE:
l 1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR X 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
20 in. Wafer-Sphere Valve 1.
Scope:
[] NSSS
@ BOP V21-2015,2016 2.
Model Number: VR3-3013,3014,3015,3016 Quantity:
6 3.
Vendor:
Jamesbury Corporation 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
I Dimensions:
Weight:
6.
Location: Building:
Elev.:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
[] Bolting : Number:
Size:
O weiding: weld Tree:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
Side to side :
Vertical:
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
[] Laboratory Test
[] Analysis
[] Other VR3 - containment purge 10.
a.
System la which located: V21 - containment b.
Functional description: VR3 - used to purge airspace of torus and isolation /V21: normally closed.Used for con-tainment purge and isolation c.
Equipment required for:
Hot Standby
[] Cold Shutdown
[] Post LOCA SE2
r l
FERM[ UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 Std3GEbThLUNDY l EMD File #.
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC X
's NWNSWR*
i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C P-41C A G C l
(
11.
Pertinent reference design spccifications:
3071-501 & 3071-12 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes C No IV.
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD: [] Test
[$ Analysis
[] Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
Seismic Qualification of Jamesbury Valves b.
Number and Date:
JHA-76-34, August 31, 1977
~
2.
Company that prepared report: John Henry Associates, Inc.
3.
Company that reviewed report: Daniel International Corp.
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: [X] Seismic only
[] Hydrodynamic only
[] Seismic and Hydrodynamic Other (Specify) :
2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
hi' solute Sum N/A
[] SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE):
Basis for damping:
N/A Emerg. (SSE) :
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
0 ZPA
@ Other (Specify) : accelerations from piping analysis at valve location Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
[] Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overan gualifi' tion program:
(
C5 No v.
FERMI UNIT 2 Project (6139-40 SARGENT&LUfjDY l
souiesenT nynAnic EMo Pile #
I 12NGINR3MS
. l c -ic roo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
N/A 1.
Test Method:
[] Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis E
Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
[] No
[] Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting :
Number:_
Size
[] Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
Yes
[] No
[] Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis Static analysis Static coefficient analysis Dynamic analysis:
Response spectrum Time history 2.
Model type:
[] l-dimensional
[] 2-din,ensional 3-dimensional
I L
l l
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 i
SARGEfjT&LUEJDY t
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
'ENGINESMS i
EMD File #
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 g
c-ic4co 3.
Method of analysis:
[g Computer-aided calculation programs used:
Stardyne
[$ Hand calculations 4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
[] Yes No N/A 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stgeps Sgrgss Body Neck Tension 4.271 38 Shear 2.596 22 00
.80 Shaft Tension 25.628 110.00 Shear 26.090 66.00 Bracket Tension 20.591 30.00 Shear 14.044 18.00 Bracket Flange Bolts Tension 52.226 105.00 Shear 40.628 63.00 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only) ac Allow Element Stress Stress 1
l l
VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l l
1 l
9
. --- m
1 t
FERMI UNIT 2 U
Project #6139-40
! SARGEfjT&LUijDY l
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
[U
'$NOWakR -)
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 t
-.(
1 1
r s
FERMI fluCLEAR STATION UtilT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMP"4Y BALAflCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYilAMIC QUALIFiCATI0fl
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME:
Testable Swing Check Valve 20" - 900 lb.
EQUIPl'ENT NO. :
V12-2001,2,3,4 SPEC. NO.: 3071-501 LOCATION:
Reactor Building, El. 278' 9-1/2" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALITICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
DECO File #PI.-738 containing Anamet Laboratories report
(',
- 373.98 Rev. A dated October 30, 1973 on the stress and seismic analysis of Anchcr Valve Company's 20" Exercisable swing check valve.
l l
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Approved by:
Date:
-l 2
9-O CERMI UNIT 2 Project 06139-40 SARGEiJT& LUijDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
7jff7 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 QUALIFICATI0tlSUMMAfg LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Norraal + Operating Bases Earthquake Normal + Design Basis Earthquake ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Valve was analyzed to the requirements of ASME-B&PV Code Section III, 1971 with Winter 1971 Addenda.
pressure retaining parts are qualified for class 1 valve design requirements of NB-3500.
Non-pressure retaining components have been qualified to the criteria established in NB-3200.
The connection between valve body and bonnet is evaluated by using Anamet's computer program BILAPSS.
1 i
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 B
SARGEUT&LUDDY ll EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
'ENCINESNe d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6
{-
esic co a
t QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy V12-2001 V12-2003 II.
COMPONENT NAME:
Anchor 20" Swing Check V12-2002 V12-2004 1.
Scope:
@ BOP 2.
Model Number: 20"-900# Exercisable Swing Check Quantity:
4 3.
Vendor:
Anchor Valve Co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
Check valve Dimensions:
20" Weight:
6.
Location: Building:
Reactor Bldg.
Elev.: 278'9h" 7
Field Mounting Conditions:
O Bolting: Number:
Size:
Welding: Weld Type:_ Butt weldinct to nipe K
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
Rigid 1 b
assumed Side to side :
Rigid Vertical:
Rigid s
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
N/A Laboratory Test O Analysis Other 10.
a.
System in which located:
Feedwater b.
Functional description: provide isolation of Reactor c.
Equipment required for:
M Hot Standby 3 Cold Shutdown
{ Post LOCA
7 FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 SARGENT&l. UNDY i '
EQUIPMENT DYNAMlC EMD File #
'mmaann
- QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 C M8C AGO f
y
.11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: O Yes C No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD:
Test
@ Analysis
~
O Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
Design of 20" 900 lb. Exercisable swing check valve b.
Number and Date: 373-98 Rev. A, October 30, 1973 2.
Company that prepared report: Ananet Laboratories, Inc.
3.
Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison Co.
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads cor.sidered: [XJ Seismic only O Hydrodynamic only O Seismic and Hydrodynamic
~
O Other (Specify):
2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra: N/A O Absolute Sum O SRSs 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : N/A Basis for damping:
Emerg. (SFL) 5.
Required acceleration in each dirtction (if required):
Resultant $.)83 max. In any uirectionfrom.pipino analysis (Scecifv :
S/S=
V=
Fesultant b.03 ma&._1n auf direction Emerg. (SSE) : F/B_-
S/6-V=
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
O b No
n 6
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 SAi1GEUT&LUCDY l
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
1NNDINEBMS
. i chic ^oo OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6
(,
VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE: N/A 1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No
[] Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
{
[] Bolting :
Number:
Size Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
Yes No
[] Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
/
l l
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
l 1.
Type of analysis '
- Static analysis l
Static coefficient analysis
[] Dynamic analysis:
[] Response spectrum l
Time history 2.
Model type:
1-dimensional l
[] 2-dimensional G] 3-dimensional I
i
a 1
FEF.lil UtilT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGEijT&LUDDY fi EQUIFMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
'QNGINEERS
. J QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 g
c-ic co g
3.
Method of analysis:
@ Computer-aided calculation programs used:
BILAPSS (Anamet)
$ iland calculations O
4.
llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
O Yes O No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress (attached) 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
There are no elements for which deflections are critical Calc Allow Element Stress Stress i
I VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l
.a L'
m..e s
4s.
LACOR ATORIES. INC.
SHCET NO.
0F
'S CR K f.*L EY, C A ;.l F.
SAN C AT,LOS. C ALIF.
BY.-
D AT C CH KO. DY-DATE sua;CcT H.
SU.U.ARY OF STRESS INTINSITIES The following table of stress intensitics denote the stress - intensity limits stated in N3-3200.
Valve body stress limits are no: provided in this section since the design criteria of N3-3500 are expressed by other linits.
i Deviations frc The basic stress limits are covered by the special stress lir s, N3-3227.
Su=arv of Stress Intensities ( ksi.)
~
Location Description S
8 8
12 23 31 1
Body to conne uc n:
~
9.72 Zone 2 P, +Pb+Q+F
- 21.32
+ 31.04 a
4.12
+
'4'.12 0.0 Zone 3
.P M.
9.74 P.
+. 5.62
+
4.12 3
9.14 P
8.42
+ 17.56 g +.Pb+Q I
Zone 8+
P 13.77 2.93
+ 16.70 M
1 l
22.05 P
+
5.35
+ 16.70 L
Pg+P3+Q 14.80 9.60
+ 24.40 Disc
.P 4.40
+ 10.02 5.62
'M.
Normal PL+Pb 0.0
+ 18.66
- 18.66 I
t P
- 10,.63 13.57
+ 24.20 l
M-1 Faulted PL.+ Pb 33.40 0.0
+ 33.40 Bonne:
P 6.49
+ 14.20 7.71 M
i l
,i
.PL.+. P.
- 12.56 0.0
+ 12.56 b
j Seat Ring-P
+
9.44 a 14.98
+
5.54 g
Scat Ring Pg+Pb+Q
- 19.26
+ 14.10
+
5.16 i
Weld m
r o
.m. - r n. n nn. m n, - -,n :.,= - w ~~. m m, = :.v, v m--,.xren,w. n,n--
.-n~.~
FERMI UNIT 2 ij Project #6].w-40
,. }i b
,,. 21 o i f.
?, t!
EQUIPMENT DY!!AMIC
,]
i:MD rile o,...
W OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
d Pace 1 of 6 c ~ c s.xw 9
k.mamm:>m.ee mmn s w un... : awe wa w rrs.aowumwa cr -r-- wury.ae,,=uw u mrmmsnmumner,n.a t
FER"I ilUCLEAR STATICil bi!!T 2 DETR0lT EDISDN COMPA!!Y i
BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIP"Ei;T DYi:A.".!C 00AllFICATION SUMi':ARY i
"GE2;C igIPn coal: a 'm'Am Pr:!P A';mIEs 7(i ump 6.7,ot or)
EQUIPMENT NAME:
a t
i EQUIPMENT NO, :
P./00c001A/In SPEC, NO.: Deco 3071-512 3071-85 LOCATION: Reactor I:u11 ding 613'-6" EQUIP!iENT CLASSIFICATION:
[Tj ACTIVE O PASSIVE 1
QUALIFICATION DCCUMENT REFEREilCES:
i 1.
Mcdonald :ngineerin!' Ana? ysia Co. Rtport ' o. "1 :- 131, Da t ed 9-2 8-7 3 2.
Detroit Edison Draving,:o. 6?1721 2196 Rev. E Founda tion Drm:in;"
3.
Detroit i:dison Spec. ::o. 3071-83 Punp Spec.
i 4.
Deco Spec. 3071-512 D.C. Spec.
r 5.
Deco File ::o. 108 l
1 i
l l
t I
I p
.anan -u,wa r.a-a m-s~~.
a vmnw__mw.,_
.,mmnn mnu.w,--_...n ~ u P r e p:t r e d l>y :
r}JN..i, hk Date: "l 9, l G
t 1:eviewed by:
Da t.e :
s,e i
f ApprOVOd by:
Date:
I_._.__,.~~,_,_________,_.u_,~
p-
=.
m__=__
T
!i FERMI UlliT 2 d Project #6139-40 i
(l' e
J.'$.'dCIO E.S."T! l h' EQUIPMEllT DYtlAMIC
{EMDFile #
i gf]s QUALIFICATI0fl
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6 00ALIFICATIO!! SuffiARY LOAD COMBIriATIot!S CoilSIDERED:
ODE /SSE Seismic Loads i
ORIGlllAL QUALIFICATI0il METHOD:
A rnultidegree of freedom modal analysis war performed using the computer program ICES-STRUDL-1-I.
Type of elements used in analysis were beam.
Seismic Loads were combined with normal operating loads and stresses wre compared with allowables.
REQUALIFICATICII METHOD:
l Ihc new response spectra curves will be compared with curves used in original qualification. The additional stresses due to new more j
conservative G values will be added to existing actual stresses and the results compared with code allowables.
I l
t l
t I
l I
l 0
l
m i
1 FERMI UNIT !
4 Project f;6139-40 4
l w u
]h n
EMD File 4 h
c ".'a" ' r.."J I pm, 7... "_7,
.si, EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC f
7
.l Page 3 of 6 b
~
g g
12.= i.m U 00ALIFICATI0f! SUMMAF.Y O
a h
< = - = - -
_ _, z
__L
_____________.m____.
OUALIFICATIOfi
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMErlT I.
PLANT NAME:
PERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detrcit Edison Company PWR C 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edicon/Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
EECW PRiP ASSDIBLIES 1.
Scope:
O NsSS rjj bop 2.
Model Number: 8 >: 6x 14$/100 i!P 1750 RP.'l Quantity:
2 3.
Vendor:
Deming Division of the crane Co./Ceneral Electric Co.
4.
the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
N/A 5.
Physical Description Appearance: llorizontal output Q
centrifugal i imp horizontally mounted and attached to a motor via.l_im..
n coup Dimensions: 53"(I,) x 40"(W) x 27"(11)
Weight:2.25ah Tota.1 6.
Location: Building: Reactor Building Elev.:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
X Bolting: Number:
4 Size:
3/4" d O weldin9: weld TycP:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
0 8.
Natural frcquencies in each direction:
Lateral:
20.12, 33.7 Ilz Vertical:
15.87, 21.51. 25.40._30,90, 32. 25_liz 9.
Method of determining natural frequencios:
Lc.horatory Test 8 Analysis 0 0 thor 10.
a.
System in which located:
ECO J O
u.
runctiona1 dcscr1ytion: m =c ~ c, m..,_ - cs t.
cwpec. r c.
Equipment required for:
@ llot Standby
@ Cold Shutdown X Post LOCA d
' m
=__1.
_,,o,;,,4 w,.,,;4 G, W _
,m _
FERMI UNIT 2 Project a6139-40 l
t.
> 8SOOE[ibl.UCDY
[
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
( EMD File #
g'
)
cuaturen"-f OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
( Page 4 of 6 i
g l
}
C H sC AGO 0
-J
=
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications: Deco 3071-312, ll l
6 Deco 3071-85 III.
IS EOUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTIO'. IN T!!E PLANT: @ Yes C No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METi!OD:
Test
@ Analysis l
0 Combination of Test and Analysis 4
l 1.
Qualificatipn Renort Certified Seismic Analysis Report. of Crane-Deming I
a.
Title:
llorizontn! Sn11 t Cn_se l'umn" b.
Number and Date:
- ME-131 Septecher 28, 1973 2.
Co:trany that prepared report:
Mcdonald fnnineerine Analysis Co.
4 3.
Company that reviewed report:
Detroit Edison Co.
t V.
VIBRATION IUPUT:
3 I
, 1.
Loads considered: [XJ S e i s m i c o n l y C Ilydrodynanic only O Seismic and nyerodynamic O
l Other (Specify):
0 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
SL-3988 Rev. 00 4-18-72 R-8, 32, 7, 31. C-6.
16 3.
Method of conbining Requiring Response Spectra:
3 Absolute Sum i
SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) :_l%
Basis for damping: Rec. Guide _l.6' Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
5.
Required acceleration in each direction fif required):
ComFungd Resu13 ant O ZPA
@ Other (Specify): [(0.5)'+(1.41) ] '2 = 1.50c Upset (OBE) : F/B= 1.41g S/S=
1.41n V=
0.5" Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= 1.41g S/S=_ l.4in V=
0.5g 6.
Were fatigue effects er other vibration loads considered?
j f
C Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
O (3 No t
s t
FERMI UNIT 2 d Project #6139-40
!(
l c.' A Jl pn lj jf c, n w s'-
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
1:n= e nnt) I p
i t
c-.caoo d QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
r Page 5 of 6 O
3 4
r m awca.aarmra r wens =23.m.,u.._-- -w,=.s--.==.a a_..
> _ _....s w.J
_= - -
VI.
IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
N/A 1.
Test Method:
O Single frequency:
4 O Multiple frequency:
i 2.
Input. Motion: O Single axi:>
O Multi axis c
3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) l 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS enveJap RRS?
O No O Yes (attach TRS' graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
4 Emerg.(SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
i 7.
Laboratory mounting:
O Dolting:
Number:
Size 0 weldin9:
wold type:
Leg angth
- Pitch, r1 L-8.
Functional operability verified:
C Yes No O not applicahie 9.
Test results incle. ding modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed:
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis Static analysis i
@ Static coefficient analysis
- C Dynamic analysis:
[l Response spectrum
- Eigen Values Extracted D Time history 2.
Model type:
O o 1-aimensiona:
0 2-dimensional
@ 3-dimensional I
I
p _- - _- m.%
m--.
..rrrrenew :.zr.= m.mx _m_ m_arecc==
1 iN'
FERMI Uti!T 2 Project #6139--40 e.b AJ k 04 we. r.
,,g e.-- g g p a ' l t
vw 8
EQUIPMENT DYNAfilC EMD File #
- c.ix: :: d,1 cs.croo ;
QUALIFICATI0il
SUMMARY
g Page 6 of 6 j
,c. m mm - -
. ~ m m a_ -
3.
Method of analysis:
[x] Computer-aided calculation programs used:
ICES STRUDL II O 11ane calculations O
4.
Have equipment supports been a-l.equately considtred in analysis:
y Yes C No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
alc N Allow Element Stress Stress Stress in Pump Shaft 11,004 17,500 Pump Bearings - Radial. Ioad, lbs Inboard 6?O 1382 Outboard 1,545 6,215 Seismic Stress in Pump Casing Bolts 50 g ump to Basep1 rte Bolts (Cont'd on next P
i 1%e) 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structura) elements (active equipment only)
DBE Calc OBE Allow Element Stress Stress Deflection of Impeller Shaft
.0044"
.006" Misalignment of Flexible Coupling
.0056 Radians.017 Radiaus l
l 1
VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
DBE stresses and def1cetions are compared with OBE allowables.
~
SARGENT & LUNDY CNGlNEERS CHICAGO Page 6a of 6 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements: (Cont'd)
DBE Calc OBE Allow Element Stress Stress Pump to Baseplate Bolts Tension 3692 20,000 Shear 1012 10,000 Motor to Baseplate Bolts Tension 1965 20,000 Shear 1689 10,000 Motor Bearings - Radial Load, 1bs 717 10,000 Anchor Bolts Tension 8112 20,000 Shear 2194 10,000 I
i 4
r
r b
p z*
CN=OH8 g joa-s0 c.o' N-f.mQ M E ~ O O '* t Q
0,,?n. "# W **rCo"U4
)
7
'$MQ s
8
'. aeyN
- I y,.
o E g 3<
tC1 c>q g *1 4
c-6 iJD2O2nCDa I
. g mQ g p<- )g _C O>H e 'E i* v2mm4 om n
g i
lI
\\
}
\\
5 e
I l
8 8
6 o
e u
m u u u u
t.
1-0 e
L L
e, 5
- a
- s. n t
1,
- ~
~
}
i
~
t i
t
?
4 s=-
%5
~ a. a
- - iu
'I
,t u
+
r' s
~
. l-6 i
e
- I
+L.
s 6 G
G G
G l
N N
N l
.l I
I I
I P
P P
P
-- a,.
L.
. r.t l
=
1 4
M i
3 II4 t
N\\y g
s A
A A
A i
D D
D D
/>
}l It-g m
2 5
f 1-t o
g u
m m
lI 3
.~
a.
_ ~
t t.
G~.
\\
~
e
' /-I J_
lf,}-
(
n A
p_-
t.
v.
e s
W m
p
-e W
m
- i
- n. r 6
,F.
I.
1
/
M j;
i o
3 T>
i
.. 7,i, 2
j..:'.
~- _
, s[ 3!<.j;.,,* '. w.
i
,,llj.
{
. 7 g
t
- l.
l.
i.
t i,[.
-ltg 8(.
+
e t.
e a
e j.._. 4.'
-..j ;
g' M
n
}j m
=r a
P
, r,
~ 7
~~
- ~j:~',",,-
- ~
w.:~
o 8
n, s,
3,.
e t
3, g
u u
u u
u u u,, u u
t t
a$*
y$a
,~
' i 3
. }cmA gl
_ Ow-gyg x
~
c IOa_Nozt3r 7 oO" mRW7OZ
~
$EO 2O. mv oymjaNo 9$ g m>aHycym mrn<>{.-~}
l a_w T
5 e
mm Oiom >CXp >24 DhOEo g>Gi I 5AQq Qx7()2mzi Ae n /r g
a a
i y
f g
CLIENT DETROIT EDUJ0:1 s
r PROJECT EigTCO FE!EI Jos no. 3<;on_c.:,1_
SARGEUT&LU.JDY DESIGN BY BCII DATE An"i1 1"
14'/ 's
-'ONCINGCRs CHECKED BY___QHS DATE 4/18/75-SHEET _.__ 0F O S 3 3
O S 9 9 9 M
- t C
2 8 8 8 I
$3. ',
i.:.7
.e
'l
]
.n i i 1
~
.__.-l 1iti-
/
id.
.) 3
.3 i
H L._
. ! i i J._:
~
/// l _ _..
..d
~
m
~
\\
- ..b L
! !d(.
!////
I rs es es :s J'l!
(
8n s5 A/W I
~P p._.
4 r;
,c l
J l;._. l ;.
,i kM NN
/
.i l
O t' n'
/
t l
1R,'R
'et$
- !J
~_
p
'- N
///
/
[b
\\ \\
/
l g
g
.%s
_N_,,N;
!'l; r-5
~
__N.
..d
- I t.
- j iy g
.: 1 i
-ul '..'.. 1.
t i
s 3
~
l ! !
3
?
I l i._
j i.I'
~
~
^
~
t l
?
l l
l 3
.I._
-4o, 1
t
=
6 2
h
....[.
8 b
l l
..J' t
.l
__ t _.. ;_.
........ __. 4 z i
I i
) _.
L
[.. ;
a
~
4.
e
.i,
gi j
! ;I
. i
.; l i
1 4
I t
ttIf I t t
ttti tt it i
e t
r t
.tte a r, I
'n r i e i f t
-lt 'r I..
ia1i st ii t
t t ! ?
2 2
g.
3 3 a
s m mn 5
m n
q s.
e s' g
mn s ww.nn "O
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA FIGURE B-22 DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 613'-6" (SLAB NO. 2) p REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST - WEST COMPONENT
\\
CLIENT DETROIT EDISOIi
~
PROJECT EUitICO FERMI 8ARGEf3T&LUfjDY jog so_ < pop DESIGN BY OU'I DATE anr21 10. 1;72 i G N Cal N C ti:P, C}
{gg{g{g gy Md DATE -~ / ' B ' ~.' SHEET _ OF t,
=
2 5
$ lll 3 3 3 3
3 O
S-N 2 5 8 S,
.n..
i i
iii.
i i
., w 3
- -4 *,
[
1 8
5 0
l
.. _.. 3
' /. !..b _ I 4
t l
. M ' i -;..N h
N9 9
9 l
l
' I I ' l"...
~
I
_l 0
lLL.L.i.
g
~
C1 ;;
4 A
j l
l 1 a
O I i g
.- a
.c.
.s
,w
_,-....___4 4 <
i Il;r.. !
l ' j. I'. '. -
C C O
O
_j i.
ds a
u.
I' i
i! '.;
y/
(
?
?
I
,v,.., -
(.I,
',l;
!2
- I
_ _l p t l 1, q,,, m j g
p.
N (i',I E
[
N i j 'l
- ji j
I... a.... t f-
{
I'
! ~
1 2
l l
N8 i
i i I
N l
- g
! l I
/
. i. I.- *
- ~
[... ~...
j 1 I I ll
__l _((, _... _ _ _ _.
. -.. ] 4 4
l. i is i
j j l l l
..t i_.
i--
._ %._... q... _ - -- _ - 4 l
l l
s c
a l
I l
i
!.__.t. q
...,. a t i l
1 l
~
=
i l
I_
g
_...u...-
.~
. ! l t
i3 j i
!t Ii!f f i! t Ii 1 1 11 1 tr it I
I I
1 1
I
.tr a ei e iiitI ri_
-l' nata it t t I
t t
1 g
g y 3 3 % 0 p.
.a
.4 N
8 I 8
( 6
{
ton s 'weimnn
( .
FIGURE B-7 i,.,
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
[
OPERATING DASIS EARTHOUAKE EL,EVATION - 613'-G" (SLAB NO. 2)
E REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COM PONENT
'l - 1R c
u
CLIENT
!)!@E011 W;TNOvI jogNo KnM ro j
kM[hf)(,yg 5 M.O F EiU R PROJECT
, OE DESIGN BY NN DATE April
,it,.
i CCINGDFC CHECKED BY HH5 DATE 4/18 / 71 SHEET _.,
OF 1
O I
i
~
q t
~
c c 8 8 8
.2 E
I:
m em m e
....,l 9
1 I
l
~
r -
a
[I I
l i !-
ii
, / m' i ' l
=
_.;.;.. ';., 3 _.}P t
1 t/
I 3
4 l
l l [
l Ii r
l a.. '..
t I
r 6
i i
j
, I
_.i.__
e i
i 00 cc s4_l.
i-.
lI Ald MA
/n l
ff j,
d
- c e-j.'!1-'
~
$ls i
..[/V l
.4
/ 'I !
ij j
% 2
- ,Pa
.n$
/.p/
l I,
e-N
- /
i x
i r-
/
i i: illlj
//l / /
\\
\\
A
!.' !. ' a 0
I
__ ~ #
' b
!' II'1 l
v r
l i.5 i
b t
i.i!l4^
i I
l f
h N
i
//
l
!._.2.I ]i -
11
~
N k
__ __ _._1.j i L
i 1 I i
~
l I
I
!M ii
- 9. _ L.", a l
VM//i i
i i.
', 1
^
. L] 4 j
I
.i i
l 1
-r 1_.
j
- s..
_._. ].. l J.. ( l..j %
I N
in l
l i
i ; 1 i
l c _ _.} i.,...- l a.
e l
l
!3 a
L_.... '.. J ;;'
i 5
i j
. I e
li i,,, 'I,,: m,1 i l,' n
,li,,,
i,,,
1
~....
ii.
4 8 4 6
,E.e
- 5
~
9 t
mns we
.m a
5 FIGURE B-31 9 C./
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA s,
DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 613'-G" (SLAD NO. 2) e n
. REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPGNENT D
CLIENT DETROIT EDISON 3
PROJECT EIIRICO FEPJ.:I J0D HO %88 ggg{}g gj]
DESIGN BY bGl DATE Anril 18, 1972 g
'CNGINCCA;S CHECKED BY jiiS DATE 4 /l ? / 71 SHEET ___ OF
{
uO
)
C C E 8 8
(
y w
.a
.4.*'. *. 9
. '"..**i...i k
b k3 33 p.>i
.a ii i.
e wr-, v,..,,
s s 11
'l a.
.' i
-, i i -H - =
?
~
eI
'{ll -.
l1 !,!-
l l
i i
h.h M -.4 0
i ad
-- 4
,3 j.-
1.
.e a
4.._.t.
i 2.
4 I....l
.Ll.
4 t
i,
.49
.s lli i
l w 7..p ;
e 1
l s
7
.; 3 3
//
s s
.__.p __
_ (.
t
__ _ t.
l s
i I
p
- +.,
4 i
2 o
i l
0
~
oA Z
ZMZ l
/
L
... ' g
.f.'
H.H r-t --4
/
j 4
I i
)' -
l
-l b A" Lr.Ih::4 i
d i l 8
I i
<G p <.::
i.
- 1_
- . ! j..;._3 _.
.y O
}-,
..y l j i S:,U:My " N Ln p,
l; I
y --
i
, l 2
l a
/
i, j
4 f
. p - - - r-.J - * -. 2
~
l i
._ [
'd-i --.-
i d.; 4_ _
...d i
i
_.,,,,,.,g j
.._,,....,4..
..., g l
t i
l l
M g!
- ~
i l
\\
\\
~
l A l l
l--
- 3
.. - - +
edg i
l.
i 1 1.l l
...... 1,,
=
m N
^...a 3
.]. '
l
=
l R
~.,_,-..
h k
4,
g I
i l
tg 4
- i i
l 1
1 i!
t
,.,,,,.,_,,;,n.
,i,.
.o
..,,a
,1, !.
1 n,
.a,
,2 2
33
,3 ;
0 4
m q
q a.
4 s FIGURE C-6
/
O hER'7 CAL RESPONSE SPECTRA O
N OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAU EL. 583'-6", 613'- 6" t'
g s
g
\\8 P
.1
\\
C1.IENT DETROIT I~DISOM CO.
s.
r-SAIKi' ]I ((-l"gf PROJECT EURICO F r iT JOB NO-otsics av som oATe n-4, s 4c7>
'UNCINCCT4CL cxECxEo ay 2 ;s O_
oxre 47ia/71'3 seer __ ce _
- o
,1
- c
,; 2 3 ::
w
=
n =
as.
n.,-
,~
I'q i.
.g j
i
't 4 4.J 3
i
..f f4I I
I l
i,j r
i i.
i.
i.
t.
t~
a
.i u
j i
- d.
lit i
i l
i I
I 1
l l
l a.
_1..
'2
..1, 9
e l
l l
i:i.
J 9
l s,.
0000 i
t I !
L..)
a a.:. a P.
H H W{ H 3
)
i 6:SN
. : :r %
/
r i
~
'I il
.tJ,,4.,
l
/s/
/
/
n ^ ct r
/
/ I
~.-
(
I
.s es < s i
4 r cm b, i
y, l
t-i p
e L
.. i,
._,........c~
l i
i.
i l
3 i
i i
- f.. _
l k1
\\
z/
l I
t 1-t i i
- i I
.....s...
I
\\ Ii b
__L L l
8 I
\\ /(( A.-ZX. !
F. 1....,..... ' a I
i i
t l l
\\
,ll j
. - l [
I t
t _. _ i -.. ___-
aa l
\\. y
[
qi Ii I
I s i%
i is
. I
..J
. l
..r
.ja i
J X-l l
-) -
l l
,1 t
6 I
1 I
8
.I i
- ..... d,,, t >
iir i iii.
i 1,,,,,.,
.1,
..i i,_ a..
c 3
9. -.
n
=
2 a
.c u
wa s w.mn
,s FIGURE C-16
(,).
-{
f.[
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BL':LDING SLAB EL. 583'-6", 613'-6"
~ A%..
e E
FERMI UNIT 2 i
Project #6139-40 q
p SEGEDT&l. UNDY ! t EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMn File #
p 1
~ '77$"g QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 c_
-, + -
FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDIS0N COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME:
FLOOR MOUNTED YORK INSTRUMENT RACK EQUIPMENT NO. :
H21-P501B SPEC. NO.: 3071-165 LOCATION: Reactor Euilding 551'-0" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
O ACTIVE
@ PASSIVE
- Rack is Passive QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
Detroit Edison Spec. 3071-165 + Addendum A June 1977 2.
DECO Drawing No. 61721-2525-7.
^
3.
DECO Drawing No. 61721-2525-9.
4.
DECO Drawing No. 61721-2525-25 5.
DECO Drauing No. 61721-2.525-89 6.
DECO MATRIX No. EF2-38,Pt4 Vendor Document List 7.
Analytical Engineering Associates, Inc. laport #77113-2, 12-22-77 S
_ * =
--starwric ar.narnatinamaseanaissumarwej Q
Date: b W -9 6 Prepared by:
in l
lneviewedby:
nate:
l Approved by:
Date:
l 0
'}
l 3
FE'RMI UNIT 2 f Project #6139-40
]
l SARGEJT8LU SY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC k,EMDFile#
f
'5%7$7 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of b l
.G-
.E _
j QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
OBE/SSE Seismic Loads ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
Finite element (Stardyne) generic-(worst case) Dynamic Analysis was performed. Type of elements used in the analysis were beam.
Seismic loads uere combined with the normal operating loads and stresses were compared with the allowables.
_REQUALIFICATION METHOD:
Q The new response spectra curves will be compared with the curves used
/
in the existing qualification. The additional stresses due to the new more conservative G value vill be added to the existing actual stresses and the results compa -d with code allowables.
1 i
n o
I v
\\ }
I.
I
l s
=._
j FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 9
f EQUIPMENT DYNAM}C EMD File #
l SliGGEEiT&LUMDY d 4
'cNmmGUj QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
'Page 3 of 6
)
' (,
J C"
^"
~ -
a __
t j
i QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Or EQUIPMENT
)
i 1.
PLANT MAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR I
~
2.
NSSS:
i 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy i
i II.
COMPONENT NAME:
YORK FLOOR MOUNTED INSTRUMENT RACKS i
J 1.
Scope:
Model Number:
Il21-P501B Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
York Electro-Panel Control Co., Inc.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
i of the devices included: See Drawing No. 61721-2520-89 Rev. C C/V-P50-F403/F441; PXE-P50-N803B/IMO9B; psi;-P50-N410B, PDS-PF0 R413B;
~
PSE-P50-NY23: PI-P50-Ril10B 5.
Physical Description Appearance: Rack composed of structural tubing used to mount instruments Dimensions: 78"(H) x 48"(W) x 39"(D)
Weight: 617.0 lb_s.
6.
Location: Building:
Reactor Brilding Elev.:
551'-0" 7.
Field Mounting Conditicas:
@ Bolting: Number:
6 Sim: 1/2"O Expans_ ion Anchors Welding: Weld Tyep:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
1 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
13.8, 19.2, 33.4 IIz j
I Side to side :
13.8, 33.4 IIz I
Vertical:
13.8, 19.2, 33.4 IIz 1
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
]'
Laborat.ory Test
[>I] Analys'is i
O other t
i 10.
a.
System in which located:
Contr ol Air b.
Functional description:
{
g i
Equipment required for:
i c.
j O iiot Standby 0 Cold shutdown O Poot Loc ^
l 4
=
me.~.-
,*.m.,_
m -
,.,,-we y..
,-e,..,.-..-.,,--.a.,-4,,e-,w.,
- w. g,
---.m,.--g.
e m.c, y
-,-,e-.
. ~, - -
==3p.--
e
+ - - - * -
N
. = - _ -
=-
-,,,.__,l f.
l l
FERMI. UNIT 2 Project il 6139-4 0 i
l l SAflGENT&LUUDY j
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC j
EMD File if j
l
'nNC N"O**4 2 OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
? Page 4 of 6
! l l
l 1
l C H'C AGo t
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
DECO 3071-165 l
III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVItILABLE FOR INSPFCTION IN THE PLANT: 0 Yes C No i
i IV.
EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METilOD: O Test
@ Analysis O combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
"Scismic Analysis of Floor Mounted Instrument Rachs"
]
b.
Number and Date: f77113-2 December 22, 1977 2.
Company that prepared report: Analytical Ennineerinn Assoc., Inc.
3.
tpany that reviewed report: Detroit E 'ison Co.
J j
V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
I 1.
Loads considered: [X] Seismic only 0 nydrodynamic only O Seismic and nydrecynamic O Other (Specify) : _
O 2.
Required response spectra (attach the' graphs):
SL-3988 Rev. 00 4-18-72 B-5,29,6,30,13,37, C-1,6.I1.16.5.9.19.15 l
3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
16 solute Sum SRSS 4.
Damping Uract (OBE) : 1/2%
Basis for damping:Jen. Guide 1.61 i
Emerg. (SSE):
1%
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if-required):
ZPA O Other (Specify) :
I ot Required i
Upset (OBE): F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
6.
Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered ?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification t.rogram:
i O No l
1
...m ij 1
1
- 1 FERMI UNIT 2 1 Project #6139-40
] SMiGE3Y&LUO9Y I Exo File g
EauleMENT nYnAMic t
i 1:uommaud; i
j
- c. ~,c aa c QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
g Page 5 of 6 L
6.-m _ -- -
=,c-:.im - =,_w _ _no._ _._r.si.s
.-u-o r.nl VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
N/A 1.
Test Method:
O Single frequency:
O Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: O Single axis Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg.(SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple fuguency test does TRS envelop RRS?
O No Yes (attach TRS graphs) 5.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
_ V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
{-
0 Bolting:
Number:
S# 'e
~
O Welding:
We]d type:_
Leg I.ength Pitch O
8.
Functional operability verified:
0 Yes
] No C Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
I 10.
Other tests performed:
1 VII.
IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS,'THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis Static analysis O Static' coefficient analysis Q Dynamic analysis:
@ Response spectrum C Time history 1
2.
Model type:
I.
O l-dimensional O 2-dimensional l
Q 3-dimensional l
-____ _._t
sl} ~~,-e,~mmmw~__ we,.msmau._.
nzr.ma.mga ar :,_m-mw=.mmsr-w U
p F)
[I O n -u.tM.L r.;;jyf;, g Wt gy FERM! UNIT 2 1 Project #6139-40 C
L
]
ri s.. i.
- tj EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
- .EMD File #
h p
irmr.;mur.=4J ji i
lg j
- j QUALIFlCATION
SUMMARY
l Page 6 of 6 j
c m e -czo L._ _
i..-:=c.non.vu _ _ -
- - A _
-tnc-=r_,.3,n= -24 3.
Method of analysis:
$ Computer-aided calculation programs used:
Stardyne C lland calculations 4.
Ilave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
[] Yes
] No 5.
Stress evaluatior at critical str'
. ural elements:
Calc Allow Element Ss ess Stress DBE + Deadweight Stress Tensile 10,984 21,600 DBC + Deadweight Stress Tensile 12,521 32,400 I
6.
Deflection evaluatign at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
N/A Calc Allow ement Stress Stress VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Load stresses are due to generic worst case (per reference No. 7).
Actual loads will in general be less.
i b
l
._-..a e
~
CLIENT DETROIT OI"iV' 3
7W!
J2!P.ICO FEIT !I Joeyjo.
$"AME3T& EJDY PROJECT d's
' 7 c,,
4 DESIGN BY
__ DATE
'F1 -
CNGINDGRn-CHECKED BY_.""U DATE f. r 2/72 _ SHE ET ___ 0F
-(s a
....,,:,[,
8)4.=
C 0
S O'
- 2 5,,,,'O
- 9 9 9
l.l ni.
3
/.j
.{
=
.l i
! _j 1 !
[
- 9. _ 9 9_
R._.
I.
- l. _
. /.
i l
t s,
~
. l g
t e-4
-4
- -1 i i 8 1 g
y; 1
a a
c.,
.-.->t J
l l
l d,
,_..I.-
a a
2 i
d.
i.R t'l t?
l m
e N
r t,t JA)
\\
l
3 y[
\\
l 4
t;,
3 p
l
'I '. %
a n
a i
I
~)
l 4....
n
,n t
l I
i l
l
/. /
i
\\
r i
i l
4, l
l
~,w..
l l}
i i
...4 i
h l
i j
l l
,I
.3..__.--..__.,s.
l l I
I 5
r
.s P
i b
.a
....... g..
l i
h j
l s
I j
gll '
t t
l 4
r I
b inni ne i
i i
t intt t t tt i?ti ti ii.i t
t i
e inra ie i i iisiilii i!i!'
i i..n g
g g
g n
~
a.
e.
s sigvft 8 'uoi.tme21v p
,a
@h-l FIGURE' B--5 N
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 583'-6" (SLAB NO. 'T REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT
'l - GV.
a
) ) f ~ (.
A
't 7
CLIENT DETROIT EDISOli PROJECT EIII ICO FEiiiil jos so" m<_o-SARGERTSi.UDDY DESIGN BY oL}n DATE feril 10.
- -n e
'UNQtNCI2RS CHECKED BY_
HS DATE d/13/~'!- SHE ET _ 0F H
Ca.
s nE E:
+
n=
ss.
a 3
..=....~
y ~
,.\\
A ! : : !:
1 5
I
/ / - /
> ~.
, A,__-
i
//
'. _.}_.. _.-
I t
/fYLi..
~
I
! //// !
.. t...:
I on n n
$ 5 @Y J'///
i L'
E5 52
/ ///
I 'l l',
$5
//
/,/
l Ra RM
/
3 r
N tn b s
x s -
/
I-
\\ Y
[ [
j O,
N
>s N
.i sls s
N*.N
-i o
\\
G
~
a.
N j
s s
a NN
- t
% K~.
'ltl 2
- I
,1 A
i-
.' l
]-
i
~
l ji^
- d. -
t ! !
J J.;$
. 4
~
II !
/[ '
. J.,, ; I -j a l
l l i l
. i I
i i
i
,!..' i _ $ __. :
i i i l i
! Q 1
i i
t
.. q... _.'. L _
-iis o
l'
\\b.,e}\\..,....i i ' ' * ; -i.
a
~
N f _. _p l 1 w
. a. 4..- __4, z 4
t Y
a -
I o
l
)
s a
q ___.6
. L
._a-I I
l
.i
- 1 l
ji!. '. ; -e j
.a tttt;
.1 i l i l 1 l
in! a aa e a 1
! Ii!I i! IEi f 1t t i Iff1 t t I t i
f f
f i
f Itt?f9 err ie 2
g 7
H 2
3:
3 t n 5 c
9 6 4 4 swn s wmmy F
FIGURE B Cq HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE' SPECTRA i
DESIGN DASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVA",'lON - 533'-6" (SLAB NO. l'i
., REACTOR AUXILIARY DUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT i
e, hh m
SARGR" dT& LUD0' Y PROJECT EgICOFERMI jogyo -&?2 DESIGN BY hl DATE.mril 18. 197..
iCNCINGt2R 2.l CHECKED BY_.I li5 DATE 1 5 - '
SHE ET __ OF
.l s
~
E E
E :
a a
a m em e
m e
4 s 8 c.
9 a
...,pj...
4
'l
~
jA l
,.c_'a_. 3
~
e.
3 l
i i ;.. _ j
__ _f_.
l W.
a } i
.t s
c l
'l l
! I l
e-l!!! ! $
.-.e,......-
a
=
Z
_ [i ii*!!'
U U
U d
- A.. _.. I _ : -
1 c.,__ _c _._ n.
. i ;
E u
E c
i! l Q
Q Q
C I
- u..i.- '
l
!. i
.3 "M
'J.
2 a t-N in l
t (i...'i Ng i
g
.Z d m; g
g
' 8 :
r
~,- _
i Y
v J
~
t k I..i h."I !.
1 r
4 4
i I,:
1 i.i i
e 4...___.
2_J... a.....
I i
_L_
_ i. i,... !
j i
a-
,e e
._s....*
l l l _
I
~.
l
~_ _J f
l l l
l l
/
l
}
.p,. _ a s 7..
S l.
.'s a
l i
_..l__.,
.a i
1 l
_'._.5._.
u m
s.
g I
e t
A1IE II i1 1
1 I
i 1
I iti1 1 I i '
IIfL 11 1 i f
t t
f a
f
?tfI g i1 1 1? tl 1 1 1,_
g g
a a
9 9 s a a f
2 2
s3
- a<
zuun 5 '% weeny FIGURE B-G
,.s
)
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 683'-6" (SLAB NO.1)
REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST - WEST COM PONENT x
'l * '-
.\\
. l
-Q
.s' W __
o....,
gs CLIENT m:TnnTT I m..t -
C M gg]Q}]yglg))y
- gfC;y 0 N;,,, e,m w JOB N ICNGINGDRO CHECKED BY __H H S DATE 4 /' C/ 7J_ SHE ET __. OF s_ _
~
.a a
a =,.:.:.:....=....=...=.. 3
=
= c,
., ~
u.i
.... i i
.m.
e sp.
J 4' !
1 I
i.
/_.7. y.
- i n
/
< __., a. ;, a,
/
l! I. * **
l l
l I
I
/ !
i 5 5 Ms
////l
.!L 00 00 zu
==
_L j !.l...L
.~
/l/
ll :-
i
- T i :-....
r
/
i t
l f
1%%
M'b lj!
l l
r.- N LG
..; a *i d
.n s
\\
- x a
L \\
\\ \\
- 'l
\\ ^
N.
..a s
\\
Nw 3
r:
C3 j
l
.l T
o 5
V.
v::k
.... a.
- 2. 1- '; q.
Nhl_\\
}
' i i.1 i
NN i
li
, :i f
1
-2;.-.
a l
! l !
/
i ;...._.._ f I /
I
'l
[. s. _
u.,, __.. l a
) -
i l
! l l
l, l
, ~
l l l l
l l i
.,i
...s
.i
__.-_--.e
! I ll
... u a
...,.' a I
l l
t
\\
t i 9 r-l
.S
= i --
i 4
?.
e
!n ii t l
i!i!r t
t t i i itti riir t
e r
i i
i eare iie t iitt,,
r
- rtIt
.1 in i a 1i e n g
w e
w a
a Q
9 6,
4 6 k
$=
=M suun a ww.en, FIGURE B-30 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATICN - 583'-G' (SLAB NO.1)
REACTOR AUXlLIARY BUILDING EAST - WEST COM PONENT
)
a-
).
CLIENT DETROIT EDISOM S A I {J L5J I pID PROJECT E:!RICO FERMI joa No WR tCN Ld3 DESIGN GY SGM DATE /.wil 18. 1972 J 'u s t iGNGINUDAD CHECKED BY EjiS DATE d f W 7!'. SH E ET OF._
o
.I E
I:
3 em e
9 e
2 8 8 &
9 us.
iii.
.1.
iii.
w f
,/
1 I
/ L' /) I' I
l of / /,/
~ 1, l i
l
{
fl//~f/
}} l o!
o o
o i
////
I'i M lC R
R M/Y !
l
~ 1
/
l El Q
E I
Qi y Q
Q If y
8 R
R i
v-N in i
E 1
l
/
j Ilf
_f.
~.
'li l l T ~
e l
I I
~
m
\\
y j3
,1 i
i.
i l
t I
l l
l {
4 i
i i
l l i
l i
_._L 2
I i Ti l
l st
~
i l
il,ti iluii i lin, o
i,i i
i
- iii, iii, ei,,
i i
in i,i
.i.
ini i r.
g u
a a
2 3 4 8 i
g g
w avn s wammv l
FIGURE D-13 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION-GS4'-6" (SLAD NO. 5)
REACTOR AUXILIARY DUILDING NORTH-SOUTH COM PONENT uy K.
CLIENT DETROIT EDISOM PROJECT S3,ICOFERMI JOB NO.3.9M-CO hkN"U[jNg [{}]y DESIGN BY O'd DATE ADril 1L 1972
'CN GINDLIRO CHECKED BY__l4H S DATE 4/18/ 77-SHE ET __ OF U,..
e
... =....
- a a
a:
,m e e a
n....,,,,
l' 1 !.
/
[
f, lIH r!
I s
- + - '.-
}
ll, F-
- +, ; r.l
}
l l //
s
.m e w V,
I
',l.
t.
t.O i L.L; T
1 E E;E !E MV/
I i
u ma a u
I 1'-
- ca a
/>/l.
l i
4_..,__...
S,$$
/..p.
g j
i,
,a n o s
d
\\
i 4,
'k..
I i;
O N
_. _ -..~.
O 5
's' 1
l e
l i
%l-hs' i
i
?., !
h u
.._.6 I
e i
i l
l l!
-4 t
q~
l..
4-
.J-....
.~
l ! l l
l l _{[
{ ;
t j
[
T) l t
i.
L.
-_.6 i
.a i
i t
l I
{
ll i
l
--- - l l l l l
i I
t a
-g
=
li IMN i
l 1
I 4
..... - -. s I
{
l l
l.j i
i '
)_
o...... _ '. a^
i I
i a
^
- 7..
R
_.p..
.....A,
.6...
i_.
l l ;I.
j I
l
..,;,,,.I, e
n iii.,
' i
~i ' 'i,i,
,1 "H
g g:
3
- m t n m n
9 c
4 s.
4 6' i
swn s %w*em h
~
l FIGURE D--37 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 684'-G" (SLAB NO. 5)
'* REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTII COMPONENT 1
i t(: : (
1 i
CLIENT DETROIT ET'T50tf SARGEPjT&LUPjDY n o;Eci m7co esser
- oa Nom m3-co iENGINEERG DESIGN BY 25! i DATE Anril 18. 1072
~
~
CHECKED BY_ lips DATE SHEET OF 1
E E
e 8 8 s a
9 i,,,
.i,
.i..
...i I
.s 3
.s 3 I
I i
}
7.
]
t-
-t-i
- g-1 I
l 1.7 u c'a.-.olll2
.!.b
-4
- g Y@. lI!
Yl.
/1 t
i -
t
!EE l l,. il CD 3
l 1 I l3.
4,)'{so
=
so E
J j
\\
\\ t
. ~_
g i;
q-i l
r i
I l
l
-i 3
IN 1.
t 3
3 I
m 2
9 T.
y f
f
,I
_1 '
I g.
R f
I i i l
\\1 iI ;iy L.
II l l
1 h\\:
i 8 i d g i
! I i l I
j i
iDj i i I -i ~
l 1
I l
I I
\\l\\l : i -i,
l;
....l..
.ij j 4..'
i i
n i
j ; i '
l
'j l
_ _a i
I i.1 ~
t I
l ]l q
i
! ]
' r [J p.
t.
..e a a a eit i i
_t t,eatt tt t t tt t, ti,
- t t
.t t
t t'
.ttt t
,tt,.
t t t l
ii 2
s3 30 3 3
3 0
3 5 i
9
- i
-1 3
4
- c. -
i l p FIGURE C-1
- v VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA f
l OPERATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE GROUND LEVEL._
.' '.? i J
.1 e
w..
I
DBTROIT EDIS0?!
1
]
CLIENT PROJECT EURICO FEfU.'I jon No MB hbenbnpI by p QT!
u d-DESIGN BY_02 DATE April 18. % 72 iCNGINCCRm-CHECKED BY.J. mis DATE ell ?/ 7' SHE ET ___ OF 0
1 l
i 3
0 ee x e
- e e
c-8 8 8,
- e. 2 2
".a
.i8
=
=. ;
..g.,
,~
a
.i !
gil!
?
., +
-~, j ; --_r i.
Il l
e l
,l l 1 li 1-l
.. { l-j. I !
.j =
_L.._14
.4.j.. q g._
t g.._.....
-8
.4i i
- l i
l l
l....l o
Il1 I
i t
e
. 7--- g. j i
f ti.
}'
3
,j s
.E.
/.....
- 4
.y.
l 1
s
- i..
t..._...
- /, -
p a
c
.2 O
e i
l i
o odo I
i y
~
.i.
A 9 'E
/'
' ~'/
I
...s '#
101 l-~. D.-
l l / '!
~~
i r
)/
l z.
o
- .. J.,.... _,
< %c<:
8 i
. _..,. _... 1 r. 2
%-:.pp
~_- _
. 4.. :. _.
/.
i i
2 l lt -Wa M c N in
/
g.-
i i
~
...... p _ _ _. g... '... :
l g y.. g_ r..
l
..,.....I..
=
..4__..
i.
i t ; :
s
..7....3 j
_7....e l' s, _k A g.
l
]_ _ i N._ _
- s. i.
i i_ _ a.. ~
- z J
r i
! j.
l l
a qs
~
N ja g
.j l
i t
i I
N i
i,
- 5 i.
9' l l l
'l i
'j
~
\\
l l
1
- i. i I
i i,,1..
t i t i t.u
'i,,,
,,,r i.
i,...i.,,,,
s.
,,...,,1 a...,..,m i
4 9
- 4 &
2 2
H :
2 FIGURE C-6 Q
Q VER- CAL RES PONSE SPECTRA s%
t-OPERATING DASIS EARTHOUAKE REACTOR DUILDING SLAB EL. 5 8 3'-6", 613'-G" Si-d u
. [.. s,;,,_
(
j o
t, e
CLIENT DrTROTT mTRnu hgbi,.n) 93L"!l@ bun 1JgY PROJECT E!IRICO FERIII JOB No.30AP a
W DESIGN BY SCII DATE Arri1 1R_ 1P?
CNGINacRD CHECKED BY HHS kJ DATE _ _4 l q/ 72. SH E E T ___ OF n
/
}
s l
d
$ y 0
9 N S o
n,,,,,,,,
>m..
- i. -
>>>>i n. i' 4d l
'II
-1
!l 1
l 1
j y-
-3
.i-I i
~.) -,
...qm l
i l
t.
.. _ -..s... g t
8 1
I
..__ f D
a de
- i
/
p~ 4_____ _..-
~
I I
~
B v
t t
d
- 1
~
l I
-ik w
? g' gu a
I I
9 W
~
r q
~.
h j
w I
4
}
y
~
l 4
.4 g
i i
h 2
l' j
)
.I 1
}
i l
l
-4 i
t a_ _...
' i J
2 t
'. 4_.j --
L _ _.
\\ \\
- i i L
t i
I i
i i%
1 i
'l l i
\\
t I
l l
l l l
_.g9.-.
.8 i
i
! I il i
_ 1
\\ \\
.__. j M._._
i 1
N li a
I l
l
.,; }.
q s
___,___..J__
i l
j
.~
l 1
l l
l'I j
i l r ----- -f. -
- t. -
(
3; 1
i
!1 l
i i
l 1
l l
i a !!
' ' :l '
'>!'Itt
'r'
''',i'r i
0 e
a
~
2 A 4 6 mn s von... r:~
h FIGURE C-11 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE GROUND LEVEL
/
k
~
t CLIENT DT'TROTT EnTRnn SE3G3EL.l=i &, _g Uwp[f PROJECT l'tiRICO FERMI JOB NO.39C a
et oesica By_ son oxTe _,mmn m -
CNGINUDRG CHECKED BY JfHS DATE 4 16/71 IMEET
_OF
/
. (>
~
i
-I
~
2 E
H:
3 m
s m m n
c N 8 s.
~
e_,,,,,,,.
~...c
.i.,el.;.g
.; a
'i l l1 g
}
__iJ :
- i 9
I
~
~
i
.. q,
.-..).;.
l l
_ }l g-..;. t i
1 l
-i.
j
. /;
I i.5 -
1 3
c) e i
! a r z
/
I _.j
- _j -
I
@, S.
d s
E i
~
e l
a O
~
i t.i.
j' l
E u l 9, N
~
t v.
i
~.
r
.~
'A i
i, l
l x
.. '..2 t
l-j-
,~
i l
l I
j i
i.
J
- l. _
t L
4_. 3' -
t * !
\\\\
i 1
1
. +..
j i i
i
, i l
I
\\\\
i N, \\.. _._.. t t -. 8 i
i i i l
l M
~
t a
l ja
'l N
.;}.q
,j 1
3 l
h'*
1 -
I l
l s:
l L
l
}
l l l
. _7....p.. ;..
..t
. i l
i
~
l l
4 ll l
i-l l'
-.... i..,
...I, i
9
,k E E E
E E
E "
~
d 5
6 '.
~
E I.
8 A
nivn a w
.e:~
h FIGURE C-11 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA DtiSIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE GROUND LEVEL l
v
r h
~
C1. LENT DETROIT EDISON CO.
o-C r#
. SARG: gag g ] ]
PROJECT E:iRICO FE9MT JOB NO-DESIGN BY SGM DATE hn6 um iCNDINCDI4Q CHECKED BY_HHS DATE 4/ t 6/ 71 '5HE ET
_ OF O =~
O g
i el og
- j E E:
u a
a 9
m e 5 m
9 n
2 3
8 8
~
..r 1
iiii
.i.
4 i
i i
1 i
rier a.
6 isii I
i>Iiii l.;.
1 l
t.
81 r.
l N
l i
8 j _4..u__.
j i
11
[ y! 4..j 6
I
~
...p...
f i,..
e i
l l
{
E l
l l
I-l t.
1
.~....4 i
r l
g 4.
i I
i
.2
~
,I l
.li:
1 i
e
/-
l.
-.w._.-
I l l ' -I 9
o000 i
2 t I.
MAMM i
i '
j O
6 M-%
l I
i.
i ns s-o N T3 % $.
~
i 1
i:
t ~,:
I i
m' N o b, l
/.,/
/ '~~/
'5 L,
a
+
i T-i
/(1
(
.i i
i=
.c-i ~~}
1 F
i j
I j~
i i i \\,2 i
l i -.-
r-I
\\
__p LL l'
?
L_ L...._....... : a
'l l
\\
g=
I i I l
\\
j - \\ il1 l l l j
!.. a..
. -aa
.1
=
l Ni li I.
l I
\\- %
a i
e l
~
s i%
- 1 %
_. +...,i t
p-
.A I' -._
- [
f _._!.
.._} s.
-l l
1 i
I l
j
- l l
j I
i i
t 1 1 1 1 i t
t tif1 g1 ! I frI1 iei n 1
i f
f 1
t 1ifi nn.
!1I ir f,1.
I *,
g.
=
3:
3
=
2 4 s son s wwen O.
-{
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA FIGURE C-16 DESIGN BASIS E/ 7THOUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL. 58 3'-G". 613'-6" l
3
(
4/
.v 4.
o s.i
-v 1
pyy,,,
..t.s>>tt,
. ;f
.S y
w I
l s-L.
q_
m
~
%~
O O
O n
..e.o Pe p p. CPS l'3 30 D
je to 1.0 il t,9 to S.
me,....
r
,r, 2
G3 FOR EQUIPMENT.*. LOCATED WITHIN A
~ 3, O,
.-- -DISTANCE = 2t FROM THE WALL WHERE no ;-
tt'
. ;*i t IS THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB.
-1 f8 go
[g P=
u, gC O
g m
to
~
p <C3 to f
J te to 4
O q g to o
r
>O<'
p
'~.kl..
!'A 111 1Ia:
r to is pgm myj
~
1 "i-18Mll ll M; 9
$P IO-
~
l Q g g ;;
m y' o p
-., '.. I1AilI ' t i3; m
to :-..
.p
, to.
=
tmp
~
.' {
f. :..
iinia ira:
i n
m$H ts O
./
t.
7, x.q t
e, _4 m O pi
. T (D C
^
- y}. c 3 c;
- y g,.
O a
to y
us y n yCgR
,.-. - - -...~
to
,a 1
a 3
.\\
o.-)
.e q
g gg g
7
,e c,, f l y y
y g
M
.3 g
no i
o>o
.gqq l
- s. o x I
4 u
y Aa m m l-2p
{
f.,.'g g
.3 9 [D C
e.
J
.h >-
i
'.t 1 s.
s 1
3
/;
f.
.2
.}V r r
3 O
6 l
. ', H is,
j/, e a
i. g l j.
is
),
3 n
. u O
l e.
l.
l i
e m am in to a; g
. a i
e
- j os g.
i
- ,x
- g u
l
\\,_
..t..
.. 4. 114.
es 0
e a
c' O
W n
m
...eas.
m
.y
.s i
is a
s to Lt le e.
V
~
21:
CLIENT DETROIT ETSCH PROJECT E IRIC0 PE!EI joa no3999
[^@fhj[h E EI]hV DESIGN BY
& a',
DATE Anril 18. 107?
i lh
'ONDINGuiltG CHECKED BY !.@
DATE J/lj 72 Si:E E T _ _ O F i
,2 5
0
- y 0 3
0 0
S 9 9 9 9 e
N c
2 8 8 8
~
o
. d
'i i,,,
.i oi, i...
i.....
I e.
l j!I j-0 ll f.
.4 0 1
i e
i eg l.; g e I
3
-{l '
j -j-l !
l
{
l
--- --l
~
f h_.. j j *l.. !
i j.
e I
l.'
t
.... ; 4
. <..j -
3 4
l e
a f
.J
.y
/' [.,..; =
[
,i
.4 a
'eMe
- + -
O 1
z zz=
l j
i I
n ymm p
a J *I : 2'r I
i
!< 4 i'.
j 9
wan a_
r e
~
f
~
I t,
l r
9 y, cElkU, l
!j l_j,j
[
4.....--,9'
[W
,)__
p l,
l
{
g,..i s
N 8
Ii I
l
_3 R
I l
- ._. 4 _..._...
.. g
... 4 i
- A' I!
l ! l l
T A._t\\
i
\\
[
l ji l
7_.._4.
.+,..... *, 8 i
.e 1
i i
j
't NN
' ~j ;
i i
l V
l
}-
p _ _.
!s l
.{ C nm..
.q s..
El
- +q l
.g I
. 1._..
. ;....J s i
l 1
~
I ;;
R I
i 8
j i
\\
i i
l
.q e
i
'I'g'
l'
- I I
.6 R
P 2
2 H:
3 0
3 "
9 9 3
9 9
9
- 8 n a w w..uv FIGURE C-9 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA l
' OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE AUXILIAR:Y BUILDING 6
SLAB EL. 643'-G" 5 677'-6" l
L..... (
a
Ct. LENT DETROIT EDISON CO.
t-PR JECT ERTCO FFE'I
_. Joa no 3939 O,SARGFDT&iU.DY-G DESIGN DY Sb,n DATE A-M 1 6-1072 JCNCINuultQ OiECKED BY._I8iS DATE 4/10/ 7E '5HE ET
,. OF _
~
I 1
l.
u, i
e
't c
2 8 8 f,.
j.
n's
~
t i.II--
,i
. [;
nE D ::
s s
,~
1 no
..o e
4 6-i
+4 f.,
1 2 :
1_
-4 I
l '! ;i l l
i
..w e
4 -.
3 ~
i l...f....,;,.
3-L,....
I i
l l
l I
i
.!,.I H
i
,q,4 t.!
u 3
t*
,; j.
e 3
l
.3
~
i a
j
)
l i
~
E QQ-Q Q
(/
1 A 3,.
--..=
9 a
g 1 t
a I
e lO H s. H, H
.. - ~. _. -
i i
(Q Q ' Q
/,
h C,n #n I
.~j y
m,
//
L l//s}
y g
c W.d R '
i a
c y tnO
._..;..,c-l t
- r--
=
.\\
\\
c
\\
/
s' g
\\.. \\.
/, -l l I
l
- i. -
u i
-t
\\\\ \\
- w. ;_
I
__b-.
t
.j.4 j
f t i l
=
ki
~
8 r-a l t l '- l s l
.d.
a
- ii ! i i
I
.a
- :. l l i
i lit
~
I
's k._=
l '.
I g
_ f.... t I
I
,s
~
l I
s
.m l ).
]'
......s s
\\ \\'.
N,.
I
_ p.
4 i
i m
l i r li,
v_,
i
,,,,i,.
s,n 1
en m
~
c e a a 6 4
m,*iaim s
2
- 0
- :: s s
nuns w w.w n J
W N
(_ _ _. FIGURE C-19 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA o
N
't S
DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE AUXILIARY BUILDING e
. SLAD EL. 643'-6" 6 677'-F" N
.e N
\\I
^*
CLIENT DIHROIT EDISOU CO.
A
)
PROJECT EI'RICO FGNI gg l"{"1gif JOB NO-DESIGN BY SGi1 DATE _ Anril 5. 1972
~?
iCNCINucius CHECKED BY_,HHS DATE 4/18/ 72. SHE ET __ OF Q-m s
'g m
s i
d W 3
- : v 3
3 9
ea *.
e N
c e 8 3 6 6
,,,,,,,,,,,,,.....l.,.-,,,3 1
o.
i i
I Ed e
e f4 I
-s
-],
4,
- 4 rs
- i. j g H
l
. ~
?C A M i I 3
8a
.4 H <g fd l
I 8
- j]
- < Tc C
,i-4
_.,i_._
.},4
[.4 2
e Q (d I!l*
ll
(
l l
.i l
gg g gy
.w
[-4 E4 O l
l l
!l1 5-
<ZM l
,4..
O I
l
[,l e
1 4.
'4 i
COM
_w 1
AMM l
l (4 *4
_j h' s
-... =
i.._.l..gl' l
4WH s '
W,, e:c i
uoo o
I HH 7
.)
I
/"N H IO C4 hh 'Q 4
l G
l>
Cfp;c
/
,.. 4 f4 4 i
. an m i I
j.
/
pm
. * =
s d.j m tn 3 l
l((
l' CG M H I
l C
gt g e
l I"@f_.
OH I
l 8
-j ', !
i s
j l
't
~
~
!l
\\
i s
y g
e j
l. " g'
.i 8
?
g \\
N.
q j
l I
=
... 4_ _..
~
l l i!
l l ].
s' iii I
U
{
l' l A
}
l N
l N f
i l
lw
[ *"*
I I
f i
.g 3
8
.2.
s I
l l
l l
...as
- t e
l l
l ll l
i i
- ).. a....
I i.
]
'3 3
l l
)
l
.l-
',..:.,,,iii.,\\
a.u w it.i i rinii i,1 i i,,,
1 i
, i i
2 2 :
~
s.
.t 4.
nons w.wm O
nGuRE C-i5 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR AND AUXILI ARY BLDG WALL Et 641'-G", 659'-G" 5 684'-6"
. a.,. T, l
)
t 3
_. =
_m _ _ ----
m-,_ _ ;
f, i
fl FERMI UtJIT 2 i
Project #6139-40
- S!m8ENTSWr.iDY l
EQUIPMEtJT DYflAMIC
),EMD File t j
$ZQ'fi"p QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 j
{
?
+_
L FERMI NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT 1
EQUIPMEllT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT NAME: Remote shutdown Panel
[21 00 Pan.el l I SPIC, !!0.: BM ci-303E EQUIPMFir: NO. :
5 9
g,, p, y
LOCATION; Reactor lluilding Elevation 613'-6" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@ ACTIVE O PASSIVE i
QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
I 1.
Wyle Laboratories Test Report f43414-1, dated 6-6-77.
1 2.
Wyle Laboratories Test Report f43414-2, dated 11-1-77.
t 3.
S&L Report SL-2682 containing applicabic response spe-tra.
4.
DECO Dwg. Nos: 61721-2798-1, dated 11-16-77 1
61721-2798-2, dated 11-13-77 61721-2798-3, Rev. A i
61721-2796-1, Rev. A CI?21-2791-1, Rev. C i
4 I
____.__.___.__----.---..-_____..,j j
h 2-Date:
7-IU'S/
' ([)
Prepared 1y:
wg Reviewed by:
Date; j
Approved by:
Date:
J
p(
FERMI UtilT 2
{ Project. #6139-40 y
SMiGEDTSIN.lDV EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
$..EMD Pile #
LPage 2 of 6 l
(..
j j$yj7pd OLILIFICATION
SUMMARY
E a
__=
OUALIFICATIOil
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
Dead Weight 6 SSE ORIGINAL QUAllFICATION METHOD:
The equipment was originally qualified by testing.
A low-leve] bi-axial sine sucep in each direction was used to establish major resonances.
Bi-axial random multifrequency tests were then performed in the f ront-to-back/ vertical and side-to-side /vcrtical directions.
The frequency bandwidths were spaced 1/3 octave apart over the frequency range of 1 IIz to 40 Fz.
Five OBE tests and one SSE test were conducted in each test orientation.
The Instruments were monitored for operability (except the reactor pressure neter d ich was subsequently tested in Ref. 2).
(-~2 l
4
e
,--w,,-
J I
d FERMI UNI 2
Project #6139-40 l
~
- ~
L i
o 1
j EMD File #
SA!1GENTfsf.UDDY W EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC enswomm QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
1 Page 3 of 6 3
p'.
i csieroo e
4 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I
1.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR O l
}
2.
NSSS:
i 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy i
II.
COMPONENT NAME:
Remote Shutdown Panel 1
1.
Scope:
[3 BOP 2.
Model Number: Not Applicable Quantity: 1 i
3.
Vendor: Reliance Electric co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of t.he devices included:
see attachment 4
4 l
5.
Physical Description Appearance: Re-inforced sheet j
)
metal panel.
1 Dimensions: 96" x 36" x 90" Weight:3000 lbs.
6.
Location: Building:
Reactor Elev. : 613 '-6" 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
O Bolting: Number:
Size:
l
@ Welding: Weld Tyep: pi i i ne,,na n1,,g Leg:
1/4" Length:
6" Pitch: 22" Plug weld 5 rear raounting holes.
- 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
- Random multi-frquency test Side to side :
was performed.
Vertical:
- 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
Laboratory Test C Analysis Other i
{
10.
a.
System in which located: nemote shutdown System b.
Functional description: Provides the ability to shutdown
((}
reactor in the event of inhabitibility of the Control Moon, c.
Equipment requirei for:
v Cold Shutdown
@ Post LOCA
@ Hot Standby I
__l J
Y
m_. m w-r-ve.s===
o.e ---
FERMI UNIT 2
) l>roicct #6139-40 l
3 l SARGdT&LUHDY l
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC lEMDFile#
[
SNc e nt-QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
- Page 4 of 6
[
c ~ec ~ o 3
g I
{"
1-c = -- _
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications: mi ci_303v III.
IS EOUIPMENT AVAILADLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes O No IV.
EOUIPMENT OUALIFICisTION METHOD: X Test O Analysis O Combination of rest and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report a.
Title:
Seismic Simulation Test Pronram on a norote shutdown Panel.
b.
Number and Date: _43414-1, dated 6-6.-77 2.
Company that prepared report:Wyle I.aboratories 3.
Company that reviewed report: Detroit Edison V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: [~X] Seismic only O nydrodynamic only O Seismic and nydrodynamic O Other (Specify):
2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
E-7, B-C, B-31, D-32, C-6, C-12 3.
Method of combinifig Requiring Response Spectra:
X Absolute Sum SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : 1%
Basis for damping: 3mc pg,,
Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
cuide 1.61 5.
Required acceleration in each dilection (if required):
ZPA O Other (Specify) :
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
6.
Were fatigue offects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
k
@ No
._-_ m _ __
_,m _
.1 FERMI UNIT 2 1roject #6139-40 s
$NiiOEUI$1I.UUOY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC j
EMD Filc #
d
.zxnom~rwe W
a Page 5 of 6 E_ - -QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
(.
i c-ic^ae h
I d
=w -.
__,,asux
, = - - -
___r,_.. __
__mz _ m, VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, TilEN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
O Single frequency:
@ Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: O Single axis
@ Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE),
10
__ Emerg.(SSE) 2 4.
Frequency range: 1 llz to 4011z.
5.
For multiple frequency test does '1RS envelop RRS?
O No
@ Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
.4 to,44 g S/S:.46 to. 50; V :.J 9 _ t o.31 g Emerg.(SSE)
F/D:
.6p S/S:
.6g V:
d;>g 7.
Laboratory mounting:
S Bolting:
Nuirber:
Size
--('
O weldins:
weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 0
8.
Functional operability verified:
[i] Yes O No O Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
Other tests performed: Sine sweep to determine maior resorum c es (natural frequencies not reported)
VII.
E QUALIFICIsTION BY ANALYSIS, TIIEN COMPLETE _:
1.
Type of analysis O Static analysis O Static coefficient analysis O Dynamic analysis:
Response spectrum O Time history 2.
Model type:
O l-dimensional O 2-dimensional O 3-dimensional Ia
, werm----x-van ~ ~ weu.mmser.nmrtmaru u:rwxesercr.uwa 1
ll 1
i.
~
y i
FERMI UtilT 2 1 Project fl 613 9 -4 0 ll v.A nn r:r..i.Tg [g'r'ny b
1 Q
6 4
.a v,.
s
b EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC 1 EMD l'ile il I;
y a
,uracumunc 1
l,, _
____ =--
,,m
,_-maarnema,sema,e.rwamaanm==:wx-.as w;.e 6 a f 6
)*
i c me m c, QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Par I
i maramsm2me.eurmeii 3.
Method of analysis:
O Computer-aided calculation programs used:
O iiana calculations O
4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
0 Yes O No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
c Allow Element Stress Stress
[
6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Illement Stress Stress VIII.
iiDDIT10NAL COMMENTS:
The reactor pressure vessel taeter was tested in a separate test.
I I
I i
ATTACllMENT TO EMD PILE #
REMOTE SilUTDCWN PANET, DEVT.CES ITCI,UDl'D 1
l l
Western Series 1316 Optical Ribbon indicator Foxboro Model 6401 ilC and Madel 6402 IIC Single Point Indicaters llays/ Republic Flow Indicator Model 3600, Type 507 lioneywell CMC Unit #910AEA531,
- 910MFA531, #910MGA531 l
l E1cetro-Suitch #242039-l & #24207B-1 l
l l
Master Specialties Back Lighted Pushbuttons and Backlighted Display General Electric CR294f"JA203B Pushbutton Analogic Model PI2455 Digital Process Indicator l
l l
l 9
' ~
'\\
CLIENT DETROTT EDI'iD, U M f' t}. k.k j g l ! ! ". {.* f PROJECT BulRg9 r, ca,J JOB HO. E iB C2 P r' "
1 os DESIGN BY. Nj DA'IE A M' 1 ' 18. % 72 10 N GIN MUN O -
OiECKED BY __IN DATE -/'"'
SHEET.__
OF
~
i ti li i
i,
\\
- .\\
l l
l
)
l i
2 E
H ::
- . 0 n
0 e n e
9 e
n E E n
....=,,,,.........3,
. 'in t' n 1
e
> > > > l n 'M a l
o n.,
no t
1 i
~
f
._.__1._1 3 Af ],b N
i
/
- i a
3
/. 'n/. f. -... _., 3 i - I q.,..,...
a
~
e l
l t.
e o
o I
. M l ;.t. -l l-k
.a
>! l M!
i l
l1
. 3,.
l f
_._i
- 3 y
- ,__e y M H
4.__.
j g-3 h__S4__. bey
.. __ q _I ;_ L _1.. _. --
_2 2
I
._ _1
-i g i !
P G Q R
Q a I..... -
dg a
=
l'
_k
_a.
l ' i l ;i.:
5 l
.l I'
2l4 N.
n e-n
..__._4.
s J
~
'/'
I ' 'j ! 3 (p
}
l l
..i l E
5
_ _l,,.q' g
cr..
- i. _._!'
.m hI l
! 'i h
\\
\\
s V,,.
_L..
.,......t--
- t I'
i
! ii a-
,7 :
j r i
i
' ". ' =
l ll l
r s
l, 1.-4.-
4 _ y:' },,.j..
j.! -.
i l
n 1_
.__..}..._..
. l l
I
- ...J _ _; g /,,
l.
.a
~
t t
g i
t 1
l l
l t
D, _.. __.. _ _ _
. m
}
l',
l l
l i
R l
l I
i i._,i i
i
__... 2 - --- j q
- .4
.a l
- 1 s
4_.__..t...I.
i I
l ! I i
., l :.
[
i luu..us.L ua
- i L 11.t211 da.u.
. ; t2 y Liui..u u un, i
ii.
, 1 ij g 7 a m n n s n
A e
e, j
suva 6 *v~,.s, nn 6
e*
FIGURE B --7 r,
't HORIZONT/.L FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DAS!S CARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 613'--G (SLAR NO. 2)
REACTOR AUXILI ARY DUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COM PONFNT
'l 1
'L.t'.- q.';,O r,r,,b,,..I
,jongo,,,t'DB.
Lmt 1(.
a "f O PROJ ECT t,f C h 7* yl'* (O F 17, d L'{f i.;
'#, L ' > a D C SICS"< I".
HATE 4H'i 3 1 Po___1_9._72 al
', s -JCPGINCURO
- OiECKED BY~Iili3 DATE 4 P
~1 Site ET _
OF n
n u n E r.,
O I} O
- S S S
U O
S 6"
s Twl <i ', ' l. '. '.d irrr a rr tr, r
,, ~
i i
i i
nii
<r >-
.. ;,,,,,,, :. Fn l
I
- :-m:
s
/ J l6
,1
- s a
l -
.q-.; :,
I_
I-l i
d i!
O' + - + ;. _
_L1 8
I e
l' _1 l.
l j
j
~
i O
O O__d l
. i l i
3
_l rh
_hy5 l'-I ;: ! ;! 1 7
l
_ _.I
. '~
r-c a
2
$-..4--.
(
_. 3_4 d
i
_._._j 7_.
- /
I i '.
a a
a o
3
. t, y, - - --- ; -
)
1 ys m~
s
<s I
!,j !
-TV y
l, I
l W
LG i
.i.
i, _ -
a i
i t
l l
I
.1 l
\\
l i
l I'
pj' <y i N
- ;. _..~
5
- f-
- l A'.. j l
N r.
~
A l
W :fL W I
__t
....._ f
- z. E j
t' 1--
- P%A I
I l
i----2-----
1
.'__j.._.2... _ - j
+-.
n g.._L_[__-_[_y... _ _-...
g.
__.I_
i i
___4_j
. $N -
i
.4..._..-__-,'e.
1
. ~..
I l
t.
3 c
n t
j t
i l
t"
.h.
.I 3
.,a
_1 I
.I t
l
.i l
l t
_t
_._ l l
L, i
1
[
l I.
I'
.I 2
.L., 2 L 1
8 1
- 1 I
.*I.*d h *_LJ '
a e
a a
a a
a
,2..L !
.s LL11.c. l
.111.11_1.L_1LL.L t I 2
Al
.ll W i.L.d, 1
1 u.
s x.
i,
~
n C
6 y
e s.,c.. w.u,, m ivt FIGURE EF 8 l
L HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA i
OPER/ STING e;sSID E ARTi!CU/d-:E ELrvAT;CN - C1;' -G (SLAO No, 2)
RE, ACTOR AUXILI ARY UUILDING EAS T
' :ST CO? 1PONENT v-D 'Y"ema,,,.,
e CLIENT D ! :'RO1 i' W T H !
^Jn W NI t JOB NO 211.m=CD fi PROJECT t' n r v7 F'}'$"(6 [ t1"t,O((
s'N d 0.3 i2 dma DESIGN DY dGh DATE _/HTil k-K'7 ?
-.;;';n!Nntph.
CHECKED PY_J t H_5 DATE _ 'i/18 / 75,1 SHEET _
OF j
b-
,i.
I J
f a
bi i
I hn rc,
.E E
Gn
- : O n
b 3
enh t
c
',,,,~
I i.
i, r,a
,t
}j o..
i oi, j
,o n,o,,
a.
n
-l 1
I
/.
O
..e j
j j
[
I __ _ ;.N. a..'.
~
i
! I t__
_1_-
II t
a, m,
nii!
! J :'
i u a.l'..
r i
ui j n, i e m i
j wl.y a
n s m,:
l
/
i f i l i~.l. ; ~
'lr -:_BE3 J f'
_i i
i l l !, :j
,e
[4 _.l.
i_
_a.
- - 1 1,
a'b, l
-. lI*lU h
'I,..;
a n
v-N i
s t-k ',
~
M dl ![
- x. l..t-l._.
~
h l
l 1
fj 4
1 l l 1 il l
ll'
[.
1%
g" N.
Nl i
- 4' E.
l
. i -
!...-_.!l},
k.
!['
i i I
l l
- M 4_~
5 l
1 l
1 1j___
4 I
._i-
.. t'.g.
.4_-,-
1 1
t==
t 4-
- 2
~
l j l 1
l I.. '. -.<.. /
i.
l i.
-.a.
i l I
j
- i....q.
L.1. 4 f
i 3
1 I I l i
i l i n !)
}
"{,I l l 7 q_M. _ y._. 4.. l I i J
. j !..j s 3
J iN i.
n l
l i
,i i1 l
1-t _1 c._......,__; s.
i I
1 l
s t
l
(
.. }..
l1 1
r,
{
n i
i i
l l
l 1..
i i.i!
3.j Iie!i 1 L_
- a i f
rr!l. rs t i.. tL12. t iir i
e t
t i
i-a i e
- 2. 2 Ea sa s a
a m
" m m n
n 2
6 4: o i
L..
..t g.2A1A_ LA.;
1 ro.u w..
0
(
y FIGURE G-31 HORE '.JTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA l
DESIGN BASIS EARTMOU/sKC ELEVATION - 013'--G" (Sl_AG NO. 7.)
REACTOR t.UXILIARY GUILDIMG NORTH - SOUTl! COM PCNENT
5 t
T CLIENT DETROIT ETH.;0',
iI enoa'cT Et'":'01ici"~'t Jos "o Le-co-
$[%K.o.EJT 6 i f'N.'.:'*r o ei <
DEstGN BY-
%M DATE Ap"i1 14-176-l}
> ~
cclNucriu CHECKED BY _H HS DATE _4/8/72-5HEET _ OF
~
s
- E E
Es 0
0 3
0 0 m e n ~.
e N
c n 3
? S,.,
- .qi-j
. - i e mTr rrr-rrrt
.uii
.,n.,,
h, I'
._. -.] $
.l3ilij l J j-
/.
N -_1_ J 3 1
,c ii 3 -
//. _ _. _..i..,._ i. 4..-, l -
i; I..--
l' l
l l
l
/
l w
1 ll j,/" (
l l I1 g.a._.
a._.g J
- = m.
i 4
I
!1 i.
l 4..l _ _ e l
H4 H
._i t
e.__%
kk k!k
, f /_.
l
^
L.
y l
1
__A
-a_..-_. - : ~
o o___o.
! [!
!l f
t-N LnO
/,
MM hN
/
4_._/;.
, l 1, s g
- n j ',
\\
b,Q fl 5Ij j l
s._
n
/
g -
i-
~
/ =l vla l
i i
-- ~
e---
Q j
. _ _ _ _ ;. L. pl _-} e.
E i
3 l 'h s
2 i
l l. ' ; ' -i l
%w -
i i
i l
LJ _ m._ _.I _1. -
a I l a
t i i r
L_
i i
t
(.,.
--J
....y
_ __._ p 1I !
I l
I i. !
a t
!i j
i Ii :
i i
_ __.. i 1
l l l i
I i.i
____..e
__4 y
, ii %NM.
n
[
...a,,
j
.__ 3
___3__
,___...+..._;a I
t 7
f. '.J f.
t l
j r,
n l
t.. _, _.
ai i
8 4
I I
i i
il
~
i aluu i i 1 dhuimu i
e
,,. i luuim.E.d.d..] :
a Iuu i i i 1.ud !
i.>
v.
c 4 o e o ij 9
y3 0 % 0 0
0 3
3 9 9 sw s ve,s>s nm FIGURE E--32 HOR:ON'1 AL FLCOR RES PONSE S PECTRA
. DESIGN I? ASIS EARTa iOUAKE ELEVATION - 613'-G' (SLAB NO. 2)
REACTOR AUXIL!ARY BUILDING E AS T -- V!EST CO?.1PO;:EtiT
+
~-
CLIEI4T DWfROIT I'DISCM 3
[t PROJECT 1C@l/'O PMI jon no imm j
v q n tagd'~E u$ p4]b' f vlM k DE51GN BY G
DATE AM'il M.
1(G?
icNCINacnC CMECKED BY)_ER
DATE 4/12/ ~/'__ SHE ET _
OF
=
l l
- S N
U S 8 8 h
0 S "j. O 0
0 3
w i
1 ii iii1 TTTT
.i>>
i i
i i
irsi iir' T1 i.
j;.-[
i-
'[T a,TITT*-T'
.i I
' ! j.:
1 j q...
O k.
- lI. -
=
e.
e i
l I
l i
J,.j.
...j O i..
r
.-t_
t ~
.. ~
.t
,3 _.
&.g ~.
{
..i 6 4,
1 6
e a
i
.. -.... e t *
- e
.r.
.y!l4
. ~
I l
j
- g
_.p.....)_,.4
!!I l
n l
I 3
3 p
7
.; $.7 g,
,./
)
},
3 1
j
- _ t. _.
A..
4 i
e
\\
I fI
~
! l' J
1 t
l
~
.L.-...--.*~.
{(i n
i s
..y....4 l
Q-. ~.
l
..l/
I l
a j
l (dr.I, '-
?
i Q Q L 9.-
l 1
/-
t, l
...-g
-[
y!,,e J_
i
~ -.
.i.
%%d 8
l 3-t.
7
~
i l
b.Ai t.d.:s t
i l
r r
u
- i 8
l I
e A
1q 2 a
- .. j.. ; _._ j'
. p._4....,.
7f.7 4..t.._f1ptRd_ i j{
"$ c1:;q j
' b I
ll!
j.!'
c N tn
/
l.
j
.~.
.. /..a,sfi. ',s'.
.p._.
..L '
+
__a /' _..
4
/.
.n d
/
n
~
l
[-. -.,.
y r4
._...,.4_.
.a f
. i _.9
._....d.,..
9 5 1
b4 I
- t--2--~H, rj l
j H M.__g.g_
a
.. ____l - _4.. ~
qo 3-j.l l
l l y',
m%n
-_.. l..
_4 _
..j p r.
.w.
l j.
w
.a-Y p
,-i l
.1 j
j l
-- _ p i
's
. 1 ;,
r
!=
i l
i.
i e
4 i
i i i !
l I
i f
~
.2 l.2a 12.2.2_Jun iii1 i 1.u t.
12
. mw.
[
a ;,iuu i e iman.uJ w 'unti i i r i.a 2.2.
g 2
U 0.: ;
2
~
r.
q a.
.c r.
l I
FIGURE C-G
(
VERTICAL RESPONSE 7PECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL 583'- G", 613'- G
s
l CLIENT DETROIT TDIS0il.CO....
uns a Dh P E ECT QCO,M o e<P$0Fn'T3 LU1DV P
Cl DESIGH BY
>mL DATE April fq_10 4 _.
~1CWalNUuMG OtECKED BYMS D/.TE 4/IN7:L SHEET ___. OF
=
r 1
t 2
c 2 3 8
f.
E 5
,0 :
3 S
S t n m
qi,,
.. ; ry],,~
. -Trrr i. i i i
im m,
e ra l
n r4 q,3. ro. 1 s
l lI - -i n 3 <d ll!1 H
- 3. H,, ++l -]-l J
N 4 U)
N:;] r.,gi!,
. i-33[-4 3
1
- i,,., -.
,1 Q C+1 l. _.[.....L:. i i
i
. a t
i i s 1 : '
(t1 N fr. L
,' i l
l.
l I
. [4 04 O 1
',_ ;,a c
}_
(
i i
y I <U X u) g, $ fj y
-__. /..t i. j..) -
g j
l Y
c.m 9
. _ f _ L..,.' _.. p _... j -
I y*
jfp y.
t
.r. m s I
+
a i
y a E4 j@fy.4l
!/,.
+ _._ ' _.. _ _} -
4 (t1 m
I p.
in USM WG y% i b-s i
l W N' d 1
a v ct;; E-1
~
M Id (4 f
}
~ 4 lt m -- - - + '
dy
.i
[ /-[
M H u)
I
^?
-+
l i
%gH:b]
n j,
li_
rr, U) H r
t
'l 1
- i'--
L \\.g I
v p
4 2-
-('t \\.tl/
g
{
T-~,- ['
i 1
\\'
j '
r.
A';
<.f L..._ i. _.. J....l-1 i.. _.... } 4..
. d n
Il 1l.-
l l !
I sL [' \\ /t-.,[.-...
i e
a..
l\\ l., -
_I_.
j - !
I-
.lII i Q 'i _.___j.__,_.
- z l
t _.,.c a
l t_.___
L.
i
...2s r2 1
l I
2s i
i Nl;
.y 1
I
- i
~*
I
.i
[
__ q._
. p 2
p' i
i
.Il.
t
! l l
I i
i I
i l : I l
i I
- t. i i i 1.
,t.x u m_t
_2 uu21.u_tj ur.:la u..iu au.
J :
e ; m b.t h li L 2 J _2.I_t_.1.:
i:
'd y3 3
.5 t n n
~
q s a o mn5 we,.m E
FIGURE C-12 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECT RA DESIGN CA'ilO EARTliOUAKE HEACTOR COMT. SHIELD EL. 5 8 3 ' -- 6", 612 '-G" o
..a_.
,gg%g y,.a g,g,
y w
.r.,... _ g gm. _.
_-.,1_
w_.. _ _g
_ y e
4 s
j f
, -. ~
i I
s.
- ~~.-.s.~*=o em.. ".sw J sed
.a.
- e.. ~ e.,s d
- f l-d5 L
4 I'
t i
t' e......
Des tt L.
e'4;4.;
.... ~
4 N
I".* L L SC A
- E S Ht. D H L '; ;F *
- a 56*..
r 7
{
lCC IC E
'0: O
KS C b
j h
D A Y 3 ".
4 I
s..
l 5.----
p=,
8, e,
s?
u e
?S '
be
- .-'?**
[*
l
__ i 1
.i 5
L-_, g g.,,
i. :i :
i.*
t g
, ga g
j l Iil 1
I
.A f
S c.
I{t
+
f s
9.= - N ' 3 _! ~-].
I r
!,,3
.j.,.,i ;
.M
-+ t. i,-t 9,, -. j,---.,, -i,-h. ;-W;, t e
}
I
)-
- ,.. 3 e
i y
M... E...t L.J.I ; i r
a"].,. - --
6 r
t l i.l o
o-(
{,
. _. 4.
-.t: i.- }... ;
.i.
i.
re
[
.. f.
.4
- 4
(
i r
x
_.s j.
3 g.
p i i ; f' y
i, i
m 1
r-
'h N. :'_' '
NE '
r.
.. -..-.~~...s
.- j -
f.. 2.. :i:..
.:. r_:-. 1.._:_.
_n..z. :. :......_n.-.-. a..
_ y 13
,y :y.
[."
+y, -..
t i r-2 4 +. A m -s e r-
- g r
i 3a be t-p_a _ g..__. g
. i;;-
c:.
- - +--
)
g i
-l -r -. u. g,- ca - ; a
.r 1;
m
,. g.
l
+-
.. __.._____... _ m._... _.
g t... __ __. __..,
___ _ ;... ____ r. _.. - - - -m.,...... g _. p.. i,. :
- :. =..: u..
G,
,......m
- y. ;.
....,...t._
.., v.4.a___._ a. _.c,. :
.t-.;.t
.L.._
..._.___._.__ _. 4...
.._....,...._.._._.4.._-.,....... - -.. _. _
4, sg *.
4
_. A.
--am-.-
.y.. _....4 o
f q
__4-.
.g,,
i p... a..g
,el.=.-.._4_c-..._,,.3,.,3.,.__
m___
r.
u
. t c.
i e-u.
t l
1 w..
_ _... a 4 t.....
fe L:- r 12 i;-
g T t ; t 4 ;}
4-!_, p;.
U 4
- 11 t t...
. m ;-
.p; 3 i
- ;. ?
t.
. - b _r.
s i:.
(*~
h
-1 "i.-l
.a. i..... ~.:..,.
7 a..- i s t.
3-9 i!- c.: : si f
l's m
4 1.
- l..1 :1 - -
a,. rT
.-4 6W
- y 7,, v-2-.4.?.-4_- - %r,
- 4;. r.
i -
m
_.LcL. 71
- ... c
..i F --
i
% g,,G, ' g.
I
- u. c
-i
- : : i i
.t t, :
r
..m
.=
!t
. i.:... :1
- m ~-.
m.
!:a
... _.p. 3 -- j _
h!.:_u
- u
_ _~.". s * ~2e."_..i.. i W -.
r.
=- :
- t
- -9 p *
- 2.r,,H 4
g;
~ _.,.... !.. 4.,..g...~...
l d...
.y
.1 e.
r,
.... r..a 3000
).,-
W I
Ito2 t
d la p
J.
l hg g
l d F t' ~~ - 3U
,,w, (.m p
J' A
nss f:S'.2%sf A.-t.
LOCAtlON No..YiJL L
r-
.i
(
tg51 tun No. _ i r
f S
v d
a c
J I.
,.w...,
L y
lr."
I
(
~~m.----
.,s s
_...,n,...,.~--.
7 I<
g..,.
.,.,,,_,...,,,....,..,..t,.w,.3 hm..
L.. m.. ~....,.
.w, e..., n p.3
-~
+
- m s],, W-ne..,. s m gy w o. o s.
... w.,e, m _.mp.
~ ~,
/
. c. -
.mug rii~~~7 r'
~~- "w. e.
m
-. --... wa.4 xm. g s
. ~
u.
/
s r
e I
t
-t j r.
.., w..........
w.,.......
-f 4au..
I e
a e
t
- e..
s.a, 1"*
r.
e.
e 1".*1. f 5. A ! E $ 3*. : r. a s } - --
- .a I C
- -
t: 2
- c. -
.w --
e.
i
- . C.0 :
w l
n
?-
i g r*
,e M
i 7
.4..,
_a 4
e g; -
g*
j _. ]
i 2.
6 e
iI --
i 3
f - :
?
r.- u. 3......
p r.
L-
.t M. 4 ' i. 4. I..! 4 I..
I, i. _ M,...I..i. C.
.J.__ (
7.1,. i. ;. T. ;.
l j~. -
l.
I e
.i
~.
._.- m,- 1,.:... r. :... -.
e.
...=...w
~
. s. -..i.
. ~.. _.
.....6..............P..
.e
- -/..
._.. j _._ _,'1(.,.
H P
(,
a y.
.4---,,.. i g.
q
.......J,_..._.....g...__
p-
- 'f A s
.e u.
- 1:..
,. ;s a f..-t... ; t;.-.:; --. p.. : - ;.. : e; i
,. s.
L
_. f...; ; -- :-
[
~ [._5T~. ID.E39i. '!M
-d":.$ " e.'*N. !-[ $.F 1.'.-iC-19.U:
- !4
. e.
.b g
, _. : _;.i.
, - d.:.p i - - -.i -.,..,
. - K.g ;;;.:-i..ij F
g, &.
s.--.'._j_
- --.:--t
]5 * }jek4.
I a
.3..!_p..i
.ll i
/
...... ~. _ -.
, W
. ~_. :: - _f._ j.:.- I. y.....
- t....._. _ _.._.
_=t
,-* :_t c.:.: =.: _:. +._. t r : :
-. ::-. : ;. -~ _: p m 4
... ~.......
i
=____._.
.... _.._1..._....-_..........,..._.,. _............. _ _.... _
e.
......3, 6 _.. _... 1..... -. +.. _.......
j
....;...re,. g y e.u v..
...gw
- 3 e ---e.--.-:.
4._..,
L-a 3
,__g.__
_#_,,._g,__.._,___,.
N
.t2_ _ _...
4._.
5
.~..
-....,.., 3 e ; ag; m.
t
..v t
er-I.
- i.
_.1
. :. ;;;.: !...- j " ! 8 j f ^4
- j - * * !.~. E 3.3 5l I **
- 3
)w E
'-- -..; -f l"-.
2... hici f...... _.
11 ~ !.: il ' " --
l.
+
l sp
?
- !1 h*h 3.
. h ! j Ik.j
'{-.'l.Iwli
.I.a.
-l-
-l-i I
a k
.-;~s y -
p
_.;.4.=
, r.,p;;:
er.
- - 3
-i... t ;..
'. 4. 8. ;
.....d.
3..
- J:
- .1 e.
..un
. :. : _1'. f.:.: ;*
- *. **?
s
=3-k
.. L,._
.4.....,..
.a...4
..................g..I.I.......... -..
...~.g.,...;...
4
.(
's
_..,, 4..
...,.. 9.-
.4 a
e e o e eeee a
e. ee.eot a
e * * * *
- t 8
1 10 B00 10C0 Feegac y (Ma)
V A;ril - F 4'sh?"
6 LOCATICN NO. Jf ul.
I ttsttuN No.
E i
f J
l s : s 3... ir. a
. r s 6..-.y
. 2= v a.
..-. --.+. -..
.w
.,. w
........ er -
e.
W..
..m,,_.._._.
~
L J '. ' L*:* ^_.y G. G...v.<.
.M..,.-
Les
).
j m _ _.
g W--
/p 1
l t
1
/
>T
[
_ _ _ - ~
k
/
...... tat
,r 6 *.M g g._
L__
L;
- A.
[ -***"**i p
/
??
t 1
4 4
d one.
1 a.
t G
I
,P i
ses.
/
e.,. e.. 4.
4 i
[
~
rrL:. s:.s: t se:.co. 5;.t:::x ;
4 6...,
c j'
a
/.
100 tC E te C mC
)
7 A ".ti *.* a W L
.i.
8 m
[
Y l.
h, F
g..~
s,.1 f e i t' i
i!'i i
,4 s
l
.p.
o f
i I ~
- 3
-- A I
i. -,. -
f
-} M,. h,,-
. q _U u-. 'l
}-IM ;.
, n N
j i
C 2 :
i I.
s e
s
- n 8 ;:!:
4 J
i 1'
f*
-..-e.-.4..
... {.t;.._.. _..._.:..i.. :
t.
J -
,f t
V.
=rn ia
_ cut r_ ]_:
f s,.
g i..
J.
,m, L
g p.
L ;
E te w......
p r
. x m...
g g
W j
g.
i }i4j 4
9,,
\\
P 914 p.
y A.:
. 4 I
/
f 1
i i
!t etir
..:. i 4
m-u i-e i r/ -
1 \\:
3. : ::........
.._.... a
." =.. e : _.. _. 4 ; :
1
.i.
[
t*
c
- 1 :.:.. -,:: :
i J
-4 f-4.;f i
.t.
i i.
j
-(
i
.4,-
g *;h
- d
,-j - \\ -i - i j,
e.i am -. ' ;..-i 4 r
eiI T-. -j v j..t-4. [-
.,;_; ; j I
. :.u
.c..
n..
s
- gy
.. rtJ
..i; g ~rt. : ).
8
- 2.;I
- :.
- =. _a.m.
- .. _
- : -- I.
~
L=
i -
._2: r]
.: W ;: r
- 1_n_.__:22.-- fr _7.. :::1. ; r-- I *L. _:. T_T.....
....._4 r
. 7_f J--*
re
. _. I..
i e-
.a-....
gl j p --..
f '- -..
4 w
2
..+
.t,......_-$-.._
i s.i,(
k,.'d..
..w.
.. -.n.
f.
.g 4 -a
-~.4 4
. i. -i i 4 ij i j
.: r j.j i : [,.. s a-i * -; j
.I. : i
.!(
(
- I i
, e r
- 2
- i..
. a. -.
-.q
..a g...:};
. + H..
t
'8?
'f l
- n g..
g q
.-3 r,
w 5
{
m
-- -+
H1. j ; *! M.] i l
iJjh
' l
}
e I
E 2
)
i
'i
! '!iiI s
- y f
- 3.. *3
..."8.
3
. a..
t' i
...... 1. : a. 't
~
- ~'
1.i.. :..
! _.1. _. :.. :... ;...
1
..-..g
...g g
g-c
. W.o
,s.
't f rog.masy (Mal
'[ '-.
- 4 f.
t r
[
Axsl_.1 442 &
LOCA18Ch NO..YC.A _
P I-itst sun No. _
f
t l'
C g
n
.v,...=
g' W
+e..
- 4-g...
gy,.
9....
., ~,....
.a
.e O
g g
.}.. ;
. A'
=g- ~ i t..?.g * '.' v..n.e*
,e
... N',3.,=. ; ;. ; e t af.;,,, 4,., y p,.y.,,..
h '**A'
- W Q
f
. y... - ---w.. _
_.._1:.. ~. _... _.
w-r
~-
=,.
.,4 w.. -;..m.. v...
- r. :z k;,4 x W J w s u :.w- _ -
.~ 4 t
1 I
)
5 m
N i
f r.,.. 4 V'
, r.
. ~.......
.i.
ru e
r ;t.: s::c :i: v. n. n n a r
E l.
I00 to t
- e. :-
- m. :-
- g. 2 r
[p.
f p.
on.w.. L j m
e J
~
l-g h'
. +
- s..
1 p
. m....
t t
i i i 4!+
3 m_
L..,....,
- f
,. ; 11
, -j g-i. m.. s_-
.- +
g m
i =
e E
l f
s=
i
- iiill I
=
~
1 h
~5$*.: } 7-i' k
Il!!
s
. ~ ~ ~ '
7
.7.,..,.=.._c.....
(
.e.. g. ___. _..:c.. :
H
- : :: n. g 24,....._ T.
.17 :
Y I
4 CY Y ~.4. p.... - -
C g
(
gj-3 e
r
./
-u
.J
!. ) y. A
- i. -
E k
r 1
t i.
- -6 i. j:..:--
.i s
j e.
e 8e
?
.t
(
[
' m
+ - - m
- j -i j :i f j i,.f.... j
-i ;..: 3 g.
..=..-s e u
,-i
't t
g f
g -~~C ;.. :J 1..zi.- I ' F ' iM. -
i,,
I
. *.MJ,
.?i g
i ~~ i_i 1
- b
]
e r
- 14L,qi :ici i
s.
f,
-~=f.S ! ?e f. 3-; -t n j :
.l e _.=- i 9_ c r.i_.:. I...i.+i..--::._. _e 2..-i....i,- ri. : n. 2_.=. _.t : : :....y. _._
i.3
- ~~ M.
t.'
i u
.'.. '.... : T '* J_i..! ~. _'j :* ". t '.' _ ~._.* ~~..L.!._.___....._....
m f
t g
..,. C *1._~-~_.. ' *.
a I
~
...._...-._.4 f
4
+
r3, g"p -
E g
33 g
. t *, t.
- p
't.
e.
e,r-4.-
3
- c
- j - :i.) I t.
.s }
y
. J q
7, 3
1, ;
g!;
f.j.- # '.f'., ( y*e gy.-j.~. i.
-]. p (-[.i j.Lj 2..-i --j -y..: ) -} q j-lj:; 3.: q._ -j j"-.:@
$ ~, i._'
y i 2
kh 4
~-
.2... M
'i g j j.q::::.
m k. *. : ' *,'
h-m_ ;.
c gl
>.._a _ _t _ x.
3 i! _i! -
-I
~
l. 'i ' P
' O a j:. i_I _.
A
...i
_ m.
1 4
- r. --
.i g
_ y..i i
C. !, n.i..' J l.3 '..'....'.... e.s.i i. J, 1..:j:.
2._.
.r *..
r g
{
n y
l'
-- ~
1 g
_i _E_.:..:
. p...
!.....i : ;_........
_ _4.I '..:
b.l
,O-T, * : t. i. l. ;......T..
I Li. !.
f.
=_._::.;..a... :c..
a o...
a eng j
.g e
e...
beg w, (ms) n
<f.,.
Ants._ S://fEP"
]
t.
i toCAllCN NO..jlA._
I itst nun so.
7 e
3 p
E 7
T-0 i.
g
,t 7
.4 p
.,,,..c,.-...
,.,,.,.......,...n.,...,.,,.,,,,,.,..,,,,,_.,..,,
- < w s.r.
I f,
- }
S5Ib.'N-:1,.na.rEU'?),Qh.1.M.g.,3,j. -gaf,...t,0 3, u.j g.,,.,.,,.
r
.: :i.
. *.... :* 4.....
e.
- , s, s.
+
{
FERMI lit'IT 2 l
Project #6139-40 l
SARGEUT&LUODY l'
EQUI' MENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
l h
00ALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6
{
3 n jNm l_
l r
FERM1 NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDIS0il COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
EQUIPMENT FLAME: 480 Volt Switchgear Voltage Fegulator EQUIPMENT NO. :
R1400SO20B SPEC. NO.: 3071-43 R1400S021 B LOCATION:
Reactor Building - 643'-6" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
O ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
J.
Wyle Laboratories Test Report No. 42949-1, dated April 9, 1975.
2.
S&L Report SL-2682 containing applicable response spectra for the Reactor / Auxiliary 5uildings.
S6L Report SL-3147 containing response spectra for the RHR Complex.
3.
I l
-r I
Date:
7- /4 8/
Prepared by:
Date:
i Reviewed by:
Date:
l Approved by:
4 2:
s I
ry Project #6139-40
- i FERfil UNIT 2 l
SAilGEUT&L'JDDY i
h EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
TE"fp l
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 2 of 6
_0VALIFICATION
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
1.
OBE + Deadweight 2.
SSE + Deadweight QUALIFICATION METHOD:
The equipment was qualified by testing. A low level sine sweep was performed in both the front-10-back/ vertical and the side-to-side /
vertical orientations to determine the major resonances. The equipment was then subjected to 30-second duration simultaneous horizontal and vertical inputs of random waveform motion consisting of frequencies snaced one-third octave apart over the frequency range of 0.5 IIz to 50 llz as necessary to envelope the konired nRF h snonco (;ne c t ra (RRS?. The amplitude of each one-third octave frequency was independently adjusted in each axis until the Test Reponse Spectra (TRS) enveloped the RRS.
The control accelerometers were recorded on tape and oscillograph recorders.
The resulting table motion was analyzed by a spectrum analyzer at a damping of one percent (2%) and plotted at one-third octave frequency intervals over the frequency range of interest. The tuning to develop shaping of the TRS was done at one-half RRS or greater. A minimum of five Operational Basis Earthquake (OBE), including those of the tuning phase, were applied to the equipment prior to performing the full-level DBE tests.
.P O
b 9
FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40 f) j SARGEDT&LUijDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
'UNmNEOMC li QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6 C WC AGO '
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
OF EQUIPMENT I.-
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR O 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
480 Volt Switchgear Voltage Regulator 1.
Scope:
O NSSS
@ BOP 2.
Model Number: 787C484 AE-Part #2 Quantity:j 3.
Vendor: I-T-E Iaperial Corporation 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included: Same as 2 above.
5.
Physical Description Appearance: Rectannular Sheet metal box enclosing voltage regulator l
Dimensions:70 in. x 48 in. x 61 in.
Weight: 6300 lbs.
6.
Location: Building: See Sheet 1 Elev. : See Sheet 1 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
@ Bolting: Number :
6 Size: 7/8" O weldin9: weld Tyce:
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
0
- 8.
Natural frequencies in each hirection:
Front te back:
Side to side :
Vertical:
- 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test i
O ^nalysis O other System in which located:
Electrical Au::illary 10.
a.
b.
Functional description: Voltage regulation for the Electrical l
Auxiliary System Equipment required for:
c.
i determinedsinceamultifrequenc-@/testwas X Cold Shutdown Post LOCA
- Nattiral f re@quencies notIlot Standby l
l
- ~
p-l FERMI UtilT 2 Project #6139-40 SARGEI!"'.' JUDY ( j EQUIPMEtlT DY!1AMIC EMD File #
'W mNBRME li QUALIFICAT10ft
SUMMARY
Pqe 4 of 6 l
r...c a e.o g
.i i
11.'
Pertinent reference design specifications: 3071-43
(
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes C No III.
IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: @ Test Analysis 9
O Combination ol~ Test and Analysis ciskhSibulationTestProgramona a.
Title:
voltage Renulator e
b.
Number and Date:Wyle Report #42949-1. dated 4-9-75, t
2.
Company that prepared report: wyle Laheratorier Detroit Edison 3.
Company that reviewed report:
,.. [.. ' E.
9 17 iION INPUT:
l.,
l 1.
Loads considered: 3 Seismic only l
l 0 tiyarodynamic only
' l " '.
O Seismic and tiydrodynamic other (Specify):
l 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
B-9, B-10, B-33, B-34, C-7, dated 4-18-72 3.
Method of combin3n;1 Regeiring Response Spectra:
C-17 dated 4-5-72 00 Absolute Sum CS
'S 4.
Damping Upset. (OBE) :
m, Basis for damping: Reg. Guide 1.61 Emerg. (SSE) :
2%
5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
L.
@ ZPA Other (Specify):
Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
6.
Were f atigue ef fects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualif'ication program:
.o
@ No i
w..
~~
t FERMI UtJIT 2 Project #6139-40
- SARGEUT&LUDDY i
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
cuamanner.
')UALIFICATION SUMMAR'/
Page 5 of 6 c -ic roo i
VI.
IF OUALIFICATION BY TEST, TIIEN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
O Single frequency:
@ Multiple frequency:
/
2.
Input Motion: O Single axis
@ Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE) 10 Emerg.(33E) 6 4.
Frequency range: 0.5 IIz to 50.0 Hz 5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
O No
@ Yes (attach TRS graphs) t 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
>0.9g S/S: >1.0g V:
>0.5n Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
>1.3g S/S: >1.2g V:
>0.6n 7.
Laboratory mounting:
O Bolting:
NImber:
5 E-12 e 7 / g n O Welding:
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch O
8.
Functional operability verified:
X Yes No O Not applicable 9.
Test results incJuding modifications made: Equipment operated ynny, gj,,gg, knob was secured with tano.
mit enhiy n rmr n
10.
Other tests performed:
Sine swe'ep to establish major resonances.
VII.
IF OUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, TIIEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis O Static analysis 0 Static coetricient analysis O Dynamic analysis:
O Response spectrum O Time history 2.
Model type:
1-dimensional 2-dimensional 0 3-dimensional
- 0ne bolt hole on the test table would not line up with the mounting hole on the eqaipm at thu une i-onntini, Ics -na wclded ic the icai cubte.
as k
L[
i FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 i
SARGENT&LUDDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
22N DINSEAS i
esic4oo QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 6 of 6 i
3.
Method of analysis:
[] Computer-aided calculation programs used:
[] Iland calculations 4.
llave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
Yes No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow
(
Element Stress Stress 1
l VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
l l
l l
l l
l l
,r s
CLIENT DETROIT EDISCH 7
EI.'RICO FEIGil
_ joa no 3988 tMW PROJ ECT Anr.i l_. iti.' 1972 l\\h b N T b2. 'U su G.
SGi-i DATE gag g o " ~
f_'
SHE ET ___ Of Ju;JCIN2tmn CHECKED BY___HHS DATE J
f
~
n e s 8 8
- n m
- 2 E
- . : : :
s am
.4~
.....i.
'4 m,
m,.
.g.
I yJ 4
s -
/
i A
A.y. :
g
. a. f. 'l, ~f 5
f 4
,4 8
.-.i i i
(..
t 4
s.
}
l'-'.l l
l'
' '.l '
I jo o
e o'
1-s =.
7 l
9a M
-i t
H
- m C
R i
i I_
i ls
~ y t
3 y..<--
l c
o a
i i.'
1 t
74 n i
l e.i<
e d
n
_ _l 7
t i
llt i 's f
f, 1
\\i
[
~\\
\\'
l l2 4 - M_1__ _ F[ _
i i
' ' ; 1_. ~ ~ g S
i tw s t.
t i
i i
I
_l
- 6 g
l i
I l
l l.i r
l
' ' _2_._4 F
l 4
s!
l
-_.,,1-.,i__.*
8 g
i i
i
,a a-l ; j
}
t.
t e.
1 l
l
- i. l l
i l i
l l --I a
- -, o i
l
- i
+
y __ -
8
__1
..j ;.
l i
t c a_ I.
1
.i l
l I!
i. t
___.. g %. 7,
_, s I
i I
I ". -
l 1
i i.i l
5 _.
8 l
1 6
. I
..j i
a
(
l i i I...;
?
.ie,,l i, i
..,,.,i,,
ii, i
,o
..,,...,, i,,,,
n i
ii itit1 i liu i a
2 g3
- s s
s s
m e n 9
~
c e
is.
a 4 e,.......
viiva s 've.pnn FIGURE B--9 ri V
flORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA
- T'f RATING BASIS EARJHOUAKE ELEVATION - 611'-6" (SLAB NO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILI ARY DUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT
[
"L.
CLIENT DETROIT EDISOM PROJECT qiil.1CO,FillMI
.[,[,,
jog nown hlb @[.JT& Wf]M'
' ^ ' " '
DATE M.1 18. % 72 DESIGH DY
-- i' NDINtliantJ CHECKED BY _H_HS DATE___d
- ~ /W SHE ET _,. OF d
l:/ g
,../
4
_' i.4 a
b,//
/
i E.
n s
I e
.2:
,.s I,"
.2 5
E3 33 3 3
3 3'
3 e e9 5
-s
- t r.
?!
s a r.,,
...........g.,...
u.
n il
+
n
,.'5
,_a
- =
- '/3 Q
d I
l I
- 4h I 3 -
4 3
e
- 4. t, -
_1 1
.! __. J.
M I
i
/,
- i.
... u...
... ll.1 b.3
_t
_C 0
O_
2 l
l
_A ti'
~
i! l
- d i l -i - {* *-
E i~i M
- i f'
l n
}
D )
4.-
- f, - -
1,.
^
q
~.
-e
_q_L n
'o n
U.
t'i la l
,!ji i
i
/
+
s-N n
.l g
ji 4,
-.L.A a_ -
3 g.-
I
.4
' ;a g
j y
3 l
P l l
- N e.
e,y 6
Q I'
y
.ps l
..9.---
l.... _4 o,
l..
i
,d x.
r 1.-
~... L.,3
_.i.J..
B
- 8. e.
[
t
..n l
=
l
+
.s
~
f N
.s..._
__.-,s
~
e
=
?
l j
i 8
...... a
, y....;..,
8
-t e
-)
t
]
~,.
a g
?
o
.l I i l
l'.8
{
R
'I2
' i ' ' '
1.L1 '
'd'2
- i
'l': ' ' r.
j j
j 3 3 % 3 3
3 3
3 9
- S 9
9 2 8 4 to '
strunS betteseir23v FIGURE E;-10
/-
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA N
OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 641'-G" (SLAB NO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST - WEST CCM PONENT f\\
4-CLIENT DETROIT EDISON
^
PP.0)ECT IGiRICO FERI4I jon go 3988 C[(@@E[jYh bb{j]y i
DESIGN BY-Ub^
DATE AU-9118
'972 v
l 4NCINr:MRO OlECKED BY 3IS DATE 4/ W 72. SHEET OF _
i
.E o
- :: 3 s
- 5
. n n
5 e
e s a r.,,
_u..
,,,,,,.....,,itr 1,
a
~
l
..)1
.g i
._4
~
....L,.g..;! : i j
i t
t 6
i l
l J.l s!
l i,,.'. 3.
f l
Y 3
- /,
.'}
t
_-. }. -.
G.-
.y ;.
vi ',
e.
o.
a, o.
i i
ittt-f4 A 9-j-
E
. d,o p.
(1 a1 l
+
- a 3
- j
.c
- L
.T r
<t <<
4 i
j c' a ca y
.s r
d-M M.
l i"
1
^
Y W i.n u
m s-l ri 1.
s i
I A
.s... +
u I
l
[
i pg/
I..
l li i
- _..__....j,
]
i
~
y 1
._T i
i s
i i
., it
-4
-9._.........
g ii% _.I l J...j i
I h.
i i i
__ _,; 4 E
0 1
ls l l f___.f n,
f _17 ld,
j j
......g g
i l
~
i
.e
%g g
-} '
1 i
l.
s
?
._h.
g..
i A
t i
L l'
j 1
i i
i X>=!'r-w.
i't'-
iii i
i.
i min i i.,,
tuii>
.'i>>
i i u.t.
E H H'4 3
- n M 9 ->
a m
n r.
! A 4 6' l
t o ns w ea..n, j
FIGURE C-7 VERT! CAL RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR 12U:LDING SLAJ3 EL. 641'-6", 659'-6" 5 684'-G"
4 u_ s s.h 6
~' --
l
~
~-},M3:[3Jlhp8ittr5t m
if PROJECT E!BICO FER?II JOB NO iG 4 [.U h k
DESIM BY_
SGII DATE _ f ril 5, 1072 e
J 7-
.2 0N GINCUN C CHECKED BY f*E DATE tyla/71 SHEET ___ OF
(
- - ~.
e N
c n 3 8 6 eg B
23 a
n
=:
., o
.i'mi1;'!','i'(~
+
-u,,
ii, i.
no
.i l 4
16 i
'l
,i i ~
llj
!'I J.
..7-__..,
- l---- -
1 i
i y- '5 8 ---
2 i
q..
- L _... __ ; -
J i
i l
i i. _...
.. _; _ t f ___ l.__
L - _I-F 1 e L
j I
l s
_u_
.i.2..,-
n i
t I
__1__
_ y _ -
i 1
i i I
3
'1 QCOO
,a - ~!H
/
1
~
HH g
Jd (h % %
?
l a
a
<g <n.,::
I f'
?.
i
- - i i
l kum'b E
s 4
l v N ta t
l 2
l i-
' ~
.- m.
(-
li
),: i
/
l 1
,, s/
i.
'\\
i t
J_
i q.
g p.,-..
. -. + - - -
r r
r.
m
._a I
i.._....J.
- e i
i..
j.It i
I l'
l b
Ii
__1
__4_ _ _ '
I i
I lj l
j i..
2__.___!. y._
__3.____..
- s s
}
N i
i _4
_..I.
g 3
'N b
I, i
5 I
l i
3 k
N i
I
,- }
l i
a l
i l
1 1
I
}
i s.
j 1 i i
li ii,;,
i
- iii, iiir iir i
i i
- i 1 1 1 a - Aw :
i i.ri,i c
a 3
,8 s.
a e
4 m
M a
J a.
g g
g
+
iu,,a a w-..m i
FIGURE C-17 0
VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA I
DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL. 641 '-6", 659'-6" 5 684'-G' te a
W"="'w
CLIENT MUIT EDISDN
~
^
eaoJccT E" ' "
" ' '"M '
Joa rn30"e-os
! MSEQT& LUDDY DESIGN GY iGN DATEJc."11 1P; 1TP h
'CNGINDUMO -
OtECKED BY HHS DATE 4/l? /7f-SitEET __ OF m
./
I q
)
r mn ~.
n 9
n 8 8 9.
- U U
'n -
- : 3 3
S iqa
,,,,,r.,,
usi
__.7 l
f0r
/
/ -
I !!
4 I
I j~/~ / l ll
/
I
// /I i
4 em e t-et F s Ei M
////
t a
g-k 7 7 7 - - -
g
~
35 5
$i.
k//
I 1.,
7 y
4
=
e
/
~1
(
E 3 E
'b
/
/
)
r ey e
/ /
/,
i p
/
/
(/
\\
\\
t
\\
,/
/
)
l a~
s
,; r
- N l
s p
p-
.l p
2 -
N N
g 0
\\
l i
a 5,
a..
l l ;
4 1
i u_,
3
_.p +..-
_y..., ;. p.
~
l I
l__j
,i: l as I
l l I l
___-.i i
+
I,;'...J ll t
i 4
! q ;4 j
4 n
l _,_ _ __l.
^
~
i j
4__
I 1
i i
i i
y C
i 4 4
(
7_
=
I
!, s i
l
-4 9
$a 1!e5e I e.
il i I i 1
11if It t I f111 1i Q11 1
1 1
1 r!
e I ifffI f er i 1
$(
- 1Ii
- 1I 1 t 1, I U
2 H:
4 in 5
~
c 8 5 4 4 s
(
luun & 'Wiu.ent
~
FIGURE D--33 A-)
HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - 641'-G" (SLAD MO. 3)
REACTOR AUXlLIARY GUILDING MORTH - SOUTH COM PONENT
- ~~
'" ' ~ -.
- - - ~ ' "
CLUENT Dr,2 6uli r,fil a Ud 4
4 3
m.__
.JOBNO 3%C-UU -
i
- ""1C U l' UU'il Q.
ff
- ~'g y C f'y'l[
t.d -c m4'*"aJ L PROJECT
.s ii.
og3 en gy au;;
ox7e
.--11_.11_,<rf2 m otNGORE-CHECKED BY _ Hit C DATE di C/7J SME E1__._ OF
,; E O
U lll 3 : 0 0
0 3
9 m n
't c
n 3 8 8,
{
1 - r a
,,i,
,,,1 1.,.,,,,
.r 1,.riii.7.
>>j,i i
l
/
1
'l l
i 1
/
l I
2 y---! -
..t-1. e g_.
l
//
s r-...,.
.-g.
-/ i I
i l
}
./._ _.... _. _
+
m i_
i 8
l l
l t
l
/
._m._...4._.
e
- -k
-i l
i }-
-*I r-4
,c 1 1
4 n
, 1
/
l I
g.
l l
l a
'E 5
'5
?
i, e
_i
... l._,; e
. +-
i' li i
(
C.I 3 l..
e c,J
.m i
i i
j
.. / l
.,_ l a.
)
' b,,
~
[5 I
11
.$~
I 9
a 1
K 'i g
i t,
iM 4
t
.i I.,,
c.
0 4
N
! __h 1
I 2
i i
j
,?
! s -
-4
%)
i i
I
'4 l
j l
i j
n
. 4--
1_1.- -
1 I
, i ;i\\
i.-
i 4
i i
i i
+4 4---+-*
I
- _+.j, 3-I -
i i
',i
- _..._L _.
._.._+...,.._.,A l
l
- i i1i.i i
i i.
.4
'l e
._;[_ _ ___ ' _... _ _ _ U._._1_I_ d_.]
m
___t_.
4 I
fI k.
l 1 I i
j j i 8
6 i ;
. 1 i
i I
i !
i i
__L.__
4 1 __
1
...._...6-i 3 l
-i I
1 l
n l
_4_
4
. :. 4.. r.
l p.__.
j j
i, i 1
i
- I1
. : i i.
3 iiiI1 't i at1 iit i ettt ti it t
t t
i i
i ir!
1 -
t.1i i nit. a b $!l i i ;.
itti tt t i e
i g
U 3
33 0
a w
a n
4 4 4 4 f
mn s witem FIGURE B--34 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECT7iA DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELE VATION - 641'-6" (SLAD NO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILIARY DUILDING EAST - WEST CO.'.1PONENT
.i.
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Peak)
Page No' 6~:
Repor t S o.._,...
q 1.0 0 10 a 100 C 1000 0 i]G y 1^
.m.
t) 1 x
DA M PING l %l w.~.,. -..... ~ ;.... r
. 4. e -
9 4._.w
....r.._,_ m. n -
5...
4 4_,..)..
4-S
.4.4-j
- p-.
... j.
. -. 4 -
.j_ y;
. +.., _ -,.. g
- m. j j 4 7
. L p
(( ' ', j_p_}.
. a._. j.._ j
..... ~
a_p ; j -
..}..
.. p
-4
- p. r._L j.
p..r
-t ---
6 6 -- - - -...
nr. ;
_.__.A... _.
_ t. :.
.::r
. -. =_-.:.:.. -.;. -
. - - -h... n..n,..-. - -.
4
- .::= : :::+... j
=...T.__ ] :_ l -
i.. - - _ - -
- - - - - - - ~ ~ -
5
. _ a':.::: i....~C..:4_d. } 5. J __.- -.....
...~.i....
- 1. 4,.
"..2. _.* d.:...
20_ 4._2:*_._._.h.......I..
.t..-
i=nr"j ~......
_ - - - ^ * ~_r ; r**..
4 I
..._{_.,
.,4._.
n..... ~.. ^.
.....9.._2.-.
l._.M ~~~{ _. -
. - _..._._... 4
. 4._-
-..f
- j _-- - r 1
m.
3..,.... -
..g.. :L.., n...
- 4. :..::
~
-,j :..---..r:,---.=...
+
4_...
....... ~
g.
. n.j.u. j:..:[:
~
3 r
a.n n _-.y -..{:t.:
....g
~
q-.
- - h..
,... r. r.. --.. -..
_& :j.:
j :
2 n
- 9
~-~ 't. - 1;.
.? - *~~~ t y,..
_.n--
n -
t
..=._ ~. t
- f.,
- r
- :--M, n
- : Jr!: dr.
- t =. 21 -
-.;=---
.=
- -+
' - ~ ~ ~
1-.;..--C_..--*.'~~
4=
^
t---
1-s.I.-.-
. G..-..-._+..m~,v
+...
...p
-}
..l
- _:~.,.., y --
.4.
.-.&.x g
m.
-.. + - -
.n-.
a y-.
._..p-
.. ~.
_a
-___.7~.--...-.
+-
.-.+. _ --
~n j
.; w a:-~
_a_
T
.. _._)
.. ~
. H.
,ij
-+
r-e** ' + - -.q,_~. - -7 ',,, g. b++ *+*4-
,,., 4~+- M,
- _7..~.
D j
O~
.4.-.,.
4.
_ _ -., -. p m,.
8
. -.. r-j
.j...}.7.~._..._,__o
' -.f -,
~,..%._ M 6 g-
_4
.+
s
_4 _q _...b.-
j
._.j.
.p
-/
~.
p_4_9 4 4
(-
_4 6
- .p+i
. h__.. p. 7..
/
.q
} ; ;u
(
{
j-
~
--.._ - - g u ;;l:=r:.n:, ;.= x}.= g,; ;
- = r rr:
r-
, g gy _. ;d. ;, ; f,m:n-C$
y ;;_, =
.c - {2ni:r :;;;~. ?-+-"E ;.1 : ty !' ^ _ I -.d: _... p y =g=. r h:::. !
._ ~
1: ~. :Onk;- u._;.;_;_
10 '._. c:
r:,r t:=:n :: _
.r
- -~*r-*~
(
0
~
1 42-* -~ L. _..= =1.: t;+xt_._rf.;
-- t 1
n.~.
21.-* !: --
_ - ::r--( ___.l- -- -~ ; ; ;;
.f c/
3:
m
..[
.:._..i.
^
.... i '
-1 y
-w-..-
.,_1 1
~.-;-.
C..___r x -
.a p_...
y
~..
N-y ; _
p
- ~.+,...-.--.___-...
w.-
..4 y
j!
. ' l..I3 ;F.. d__i.E..i-
. [,T._.t..:f.:.L ij i n..
. __iii.H.if Lq ;_....._ ~.iii hi.fi.2.5.iiry_.;. h.2
- _.i.-i
},
7-..
____,7...
7 y
.--15 ?_ '___%.. i1'I5._545.i._i_. " -~_
R j.
.-=:= -:.
.; d -t : :}71-O2
...-9_
-9 c
. _ _ + -
^
- 1.ru== t,=: =:=:.
.:g :_. _ _.-._ _t- =: -- L _. - --
6 9....-
?
j
- -g
^;.~.a.
~
c-
,/
_f -.
- -. + -
,.u j._
_..7 j
_j
~.-.!
H-J-p.
, y e
y-
]
p...
.- _y f
.,.n y
-~.
y-
- 7
.u
,g
-.. qp..+
_.7_
+ _.._
3__..
m
)*
s4 1
>-g-
.Ad.
.~-
s
-j+,_,
.j
..q
_ j.~..
p.
+ -..
g
- ..li.d...
~h
.. (
Hp.t
-t_
.d._idi.
4
._ ~.-- 1=r T.: : :. _-- --d.._..._. _a _.-.. ;.,. li. i_.O -ii. _-M. i_n.~I._. ' l i ii b.. *. "_ H_::
.-~5C ?
- - - ~ ' = ;=;i.i :
' =}'=: ' :
d: ::;[.1
-N...J.= 2 JtT **r 7:L:: :::=*J:r
= I " - t7.rt;ph --*
~-' m T
T:C:
..-_j;;**",.
4
.{-~-~
~.J C t:-
.... r21-trl :. t..a_4:
-. -. + -.. _,...
-._e.__.
q.. !... a._.- - - --
4, r,-*~'****
-.I,"-~--
- -. ' ~
- 1 m_........
... _-_w
.....~.
, 3
~
~.
e'"'
~*-*
.--l-------
A.-~. 2-d_iF-.r.r.d.::.
' 555...lidi.!..9..-r :
- -+
s
~..
. i u..in..M: I. 25....
!. :.11.g:-i5_555.. _ -55..}.iM,.Z. i i e
.F
- -i.-. ;5 555-i,h i.s
- E..i;i.i d
- ' ~ ~ -
- -~ -
_._a_.-.. C.~. 2. 2. :.*.*_.* :
C....C._:'.,..,
~~=~~
__._C....;-*_n.C. :=-,
.;C. :=
.4 g
2
._._r.
.t. :. :. - -_ ?_-
L _.. _._._.j
-..s. v-
. ~ _......
.w.....
. --..s..-.
~ ~ ; -2
. p
_f...
4...,.,,...
......-,--r..-.-... _-...
~.
..n..
4,.
. ~,. -
_~c,
}._-
m.
u_
y.++,
1 y_.,
,.. h4.p..
.... f
~..... _.._.
_m _
m.
~.,
... ~
4.,
~..
M.
.. +...
~.
3 j
.h-f.
.~i LL
. ~.....
+.
}..
g v.
...,n 1
2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910 z
~
1 2
3 4
5 6 7 8 910 2
3 4
5 6 - E **
~
1 l
10 20 E
Frequency (Hzi 1
CUSTOMER AXIS SPECIME N -
LOCATION NO. - M t
j 5/N t
TES) RUN NO.
/3 BBE
~
Page No* 66 FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Peak)
Report No. 42949-1 n
1.0 10 8 100 e 1000 0
_f k..w' (..
1 f a
ML L.!
.h 4 DAMPING l 7ol 13
_._. ~. v.
4.-
._}
_. 4 g 4 4 9... -
- 9.........4
. 6... ; 4
...... _~_.
_ ~.....
..p._.._ - 94 4...~..
.j. 9
,.,.t 9
+......._i..
6 4.p., p_._._,
...g, ;.,.,
I..j.u...49
...j.
-l
. --__.._.4 4._
..j.l.;.j.
6
- j : ' c::
- 1M
= *:
~n1
..: :-- n-.Han {..-..g un
.y
- ij
.jpppij.dfh: -
M
-'2 7
- ]
- l ! j 1 l
- T c.; t
- 3 _J' 4.._,
n:-' = I :... -...
. _... t.2.:.3. =.. =... 2 I, f_ !.... -. _.
_...3 9....._._..
==
~.d. t _2_- *~-* __ _.r,g..... _l, r.. I...
,...l:3:.
l: 1-a_-- t.t
_+
. _. }..
..t u-c 2 =_r
__.4. _.w
_. L...:
_ n p.'.l "- ;L t'n.s=... ':
7 : t'.:,;.
t:
__ gl: -
j _.
{.....
t
.a 4_,.._
1
_._...... i.i...:. :.l.i.i.f_ s.i. i.l l. i.=..ii5l.
.i
.' "-5Ml2 } =..:..=j.... j n. :. :-
-i -l. ~
3, l
. h..
i : 55.:.' -2ij p__iM. t.'.:
i.iil.;!:
p--- g g=: t==-1 = =l::. - =::.
.== a:= =t
- =
- =l=3=:::h
_ : =.=
J -- : n ::=1 = j=-
=: I-::-
un :=. :- -
m
- ===
==
- =
=
=
=
^
t
,,a_....
....,p
...1.,.__.,
.. ~.
.p_.
..~ ~... -
..p,......
,.(.
i g
- 9.. _
..g-
.}
s y.
y u 4_4
- m
..p.
.-~.~t-7
+
4.
t
_._m.m.
, 4 44.1 41.;;.. 1_
p-
'7
-. l f.
411.y%
4 J
w 2
.Y..
...- np.__.
.{
.j 7
to
. __.4 i.. _#_g
._.....g_.
I o._..
p.
_9 4 p,_H.4 4.
. ;. -p..
4.
. P.j-4....,
9,.
.7..
~
g
.~.. _-.......
j ;
yl,....
. H - -- --- i - t - - -i I
p 4_
- !Gj 7 j jpg
_..,..t._.....}:........
, =.. =m., =. } :..... h_.....
. -9
..:- _::.: _ _. tr. _: :=_1:.._w=2. -j : j._.:
. __==: :=_3 =...=.=.
r.: j -. _:l=_....j }: f :...q.____ j _:.:. !n
.r
..... M.
g, -- m: --- ;=- :=- _n
_ 2 +=}:j:
-t -- N =r M_':. E_ _j
-l==t.
j =- :j : :r:::..
.. =j=.-, J_.:q:-
L--4 --i
+ - - - -t r:-- w
- = - n.
n ; ::
4 p.'
^
cf 2~
7,
-. 4_-~.--l.i_._U. _
-- !-. j......a. }..__.
.m...~
7 7.-..~f"_~1
.. I'-~~
. ~ ~ * * *, _
~**
I J-'.,..
_.~..
i
~_.b--~-
~~-
9 -
4
. :_: :=:rn t =:::=:u ::.==:=
=.:
...=== t ::::f. uu:u :f.. 2 '.::1=5 ::-.:}=
2^----:1 u i u n..:= t== - t. x :..;
2..-s C
t-21 --
rr
- r. :
......_t...d,.
t_m 71__.--~::=:f nt:=t r--- t-- : t t - 1 :
- -t
...-._.~.:..,"_"- = - - -
-O
^. 2 C _._
_.i A...}
^*-
s
,. _n.... _-_-.f;. {n_+. - %. 7:
.-K., -._._ g q...._.
+ ---h.
- 4. _-}........,....t_..... g x
_ 4 u_t.. pb.
_. _ _-4t
=m
-+-
g t----t -
._ _ t-
._ ;. _w.-.
p.
._w
._ f._
...._. o 4p_p
_e I_
._1._.+,..
. s m
~ ~ _
=v 40 i
- ;g
~f-t l i
,,l
".-t-
[
- - + ' - '
~
'C
-****i'**-
,V - ',
. j i iI
']-
~*-***
6
- f. _
....-. - 4.p y. 4 9.~...
t-t * - t--
---+ - - - M
+..t-e e
e, I
..e_.g 9.f._.j.4f 9...
4
.. _4
+._, j 9.y.
j.- 4 4..i.
8
.g 3
H.yn.c _ y
.q j.
9,.
F
_a._.p y t
h
. l-
=e4:r-d /
-l-l; jI l
- -d --
-- r ;
j - --t -+,
l b
Eh5
._5Ni5
..NM5f 5hb NiN7.-CE
- h 5 SIN 55fI5i-t @N $}- UTE I' :- 5 E=ii$~i N ~..22i l t
S.
~.... *..
o
_..f =..f _ _:_ _ _.-._.. _ f
..a
- _. w
.f=_.... a
.___4_.._....
C. +.:...h,
. p... -
}*~. 2._.. _h-__.
- C. { =_
'H
..-.~.....!.; ;f ~.~.~. =. -.,....{I. {.
~.
..2r.j =....... :;l C......
3
. +.
~, _ _
,,,..1.
..r.
- g.
.-4
_+.
-o..~__..
u_,.
...-..y
,g
_ L..._.
..7..
4
.. _...J.
.g3
.-5iif.-3 5_..i j ii_-ij.5...
.ifi. h._i d.iiii1-ii-i it -W{i-55%i}~ rf:r=id'-. 5 55;:=5^ifn...:irI:.i iji ! -
4
%__. d.. ii.
' Mr r-=:=
== j =:=- :=== j===. : ::l:
-- : =x :.:.q = =- 3. _ l
- q.. _:{:--
- p h:4 ; t
__...L j
.
_.= 2
.m.
m
.. _ =. =.. -..
~. _4
_.._2 1--
t
.{.-.
._.g
.p.
.-..l..._
4.
.pl._
f 6.I.
.9 4-
..L g
-.}
{
6
..{
. i.t-
- 'i*
- *-4
%'1m
.,1 '.Q L' s
a, --J-'. '
_-.n
~ - - -
- ^ '
,4 I
2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2
3 4
5 6 7 8 9 la 2
3 s
S 6 7 $ 510 tg.
I 10 20 100 1
Frequency (Hz) h CUSTOMER AXIS SS/I SPECIMEN LOCATION NO.
/3 DB~'
S/N TEST RUN NO.
R
Page No. 85 Report No. 42949-1
^
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Peak)
=.
1.0 10 $
100 "
1000 []
.a, g / g
.a L.-
DAMPING To
.4
- 4..,
4 10 4---. -4 4
44_
8
.~..-.-..
t
.,t.
._p.
74
- l.
e._.J.
9 j.
g.
+
v..
4
{..
1 j _ -
- i
,.g.+4 l l
. i.q..
- !s55-iMR #ii!Ei!i:351:551.E5}Mf!MZJ3EirEHE Q=~i$"Ji ib=MfMMiF-~i!!EiMihi5F i i
'. 4.
g__.. _.. gJ..... _ _
- 2 _.._
. _ {...... _. _. =. =..::=4 :.
S
_.-~
. = ~ = _=_,g
...... g
.. a F~m -.-
- -+= - :m! :.. m..
e
. -t...
1 _.. _
w.m.. n.
g,
-. - -+-
+
.._..v.
.,i..-
+
4...
.__J _.
(.
..~.t+.
w-t.
.-.w+---
- - - -+ '+
.+{---
..) -
+
- 3. :. U.. } p =_. _,, _ _.4._=_~.-._.
_.. ".._ J : n.. :=..=.
. : j_. _
_._.h. l.. y.%...._ _..n..=.._. 2 3
=-- = : f..
...: n.".
.n I......___.:
- r...=._=.:__-.-_.:.:.:._.
3
_._p_
d - --
nn+=._ := =
- --r-1; H M *:. ::-
14. _ "_.._..
t
..:=mrt:
~+r
}
hf
---== r r -*-t -..=+--;
- C 2.
...r-1.
=
3=:
4.y
\\
- vj w
4_.:.
-.m _
_4 3
- e.._.
_..t}.
. s.~
+
4-
...+. -
y
\\
- 7. _.
i(g 4
L. '
i ili~ -Y ;,
i I ;
- /
t
+
i i i j;,
.u.f
- ' i I ig Nb i
~***
i 1
- +--
i P
~
g
- T*r i
1 10
^
i,i
,.4_-..y..
-r
+l m
-. _ + -...
t p._.4-._..y 4..
jw p_
g5 8
1.
p.
y~
- j. 4.
i i
(
l:
_q.
j-f j
'.3._._.
n rt:E..
n vt
=
t.5 1n: n.ni=n=-=I_;,
.; 3.
g.............
. I.~.
7-....}: ::t:-- }=t: =
6
.....___.}......=l==11-3
-t
- =4._.
r.A..*".. _.. - H r, =-q--+ Cy. p.
- + - -
. u. _ _:._.g._.
v 1
7 f".q g_-_...; _
.,_f, 4
., _.1 _,
i r
_-_ _, 7.-j *.'}b
^
1
-~{~,,. - -
v.
j
!:+
i i
,'4 W
l
~.
s_
! 4j j
.n;j.- t - 1:i..
1
.n :
.:.:.::. nnt n :L.:.- -.c j ;
- ; " - ~ -".=3 :22:... :- -- :x
__E-
- - - - ~
" ~ = :.- t j:u c. =_.:n.:-
" = 4._._i ym._
- T.--* - C i
^ 7p
' _.. j :- 0---
=
22 4
_. - t._ e _
__M 1,f.
annt -
_.:f:. '
j--*i=
_.1===_r R.- h:
~
g.
..n=t- ___
cr I_
g..
a/.y n.
~
G
_-i.
~
9,
~.
G
.._7._j U
--r-
+ ~
~~~
y
(
i,
- iii fy i * * "., ~*, ~ '
.i 1
l_6 e to
- f
- j
~ - *..
._.4
,.4
^
- * * - -- - + - - - A
---+-
^
_a a g j.__.
4_..
-b
- t 9.N! ;,_^-;
t --+
+---++4---++----&-++-
9 8
v {*
.p s
-4
.. 4-__4_
7
-.4 i
3, 7
+* -
+
.m-h...
~.,.
. u. n. t.=...l _ _ _ {....
i,.
f 4 ~. _
m
.....-_t,
.f.r_t:..
6
_.. {=.: n.._f_:_.
=_y- '..
.j........ __...r c..r_i._r....__.. _ 3. :.
a_._._n__
C:t.r.r.Ill.21 C71 _' -._.. '= IC TTh:12
'ClC :.: $ -- * '
n.Ct=f' ;: trt:t u1:1 17_
._i- -. :'* r;**-r*O'!rC :11:
- t-~'1
- ~--~*-~
- C-
_=t-.. _..
i.._,' !~7*- - -. ' "
_..i.
p u....
r r
.4__._-
.*.*.1_._.
i
~..
4 i.
. _7............. :......_n Cy_-].*
3
..... _.:M..:.. ;.-~*...:.. = ~.... ;n....Z_.. t. ::
. h =_ _. _
t=..m!n.:.4.s:-*:
.. :] =__-,._.r. _d_1:.:.:.^. _..t.r..~..:.:. :. C.C. O.
m cr =-f=. d,n.-
=
- - 4 3_
]._--.....
,,4 g_
- .m.m.
g
=nl=q.;,r: b7
- . g
2 rn ra -
1-
._.. -:___ - i
... _.=n
.s.
+
4
. p.......
i
,.~..:.
t-.
... +
_ +
.~.
.+
.. +
M, 4
+.-
.~
m
. +.
+.
.- 4
-.7
.m.
_.p.
..7:
... p
' I
--+
- ,7--
w-
+.+
,.d !
1.1..
1
+
L..1. %.
4 L, ', : !
- !i M.n.
'I
.A i
t
.. +
..i i:
i i
t, 1
2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910 2
3 4
5 6 7 8 9 to 2
3
+
5 6 7 8 913 1
10 20' 100' Frequency (Hz)
M CUSTOMER AXIS NN SPECIMEN LOCATION NO.
S/N TEST RUN NO.
Tn. - -.
m.
~"N'*C syg g M
4, Page No. 36 p
FULL SCALE SHOCK SPECTRUM (g Peak) n Report No. 42949-1 1.0 0 10 S 100 0 1000 0 Qfj 137 l
DAMPING l %l
}
. s. p _.,
. g.g
. w 6
._p p j
_.u.+..,=.
o-5 :.
g.
....;.. _ _.. r n.._.
./.
~
3 3
,..W b
,4.
_.4
. p.._4_
}
p.
% p.
._4._
7
- 1 i.Z ~4fiWiii5#ii@ # is iR C:Mhliiii iMi !!RMEj+.5 l
1+M-MMiPJiF: Mi1Milss M.Mi
-+ : :-.. _ _
- .x..=...3._ -. _ __=
=_ m=_ {_.-
_t....._
_. l. }:_.
.. L.
u..n.=;:,
=_
s_
= :n+:+- =.=__._{=_....... _:- r
=
_._+=:.r
=
.~
.. L..
_..p _.. _.___.
.w
___m.,__. _,#
4 a.,...-
y_.
_ - ~,. -
+
m..
.w.ul.y_.- =
=_.
5
..~.
.._ _ u
.. u=. =,. =
=l==,,. :.-
....~
=
= _. _ _ - -... _..:==~.=_.
_.._a== =;:=
=
=
=
-
~= = =m=== = = =
~...... _.
't -
- :===; =!
- + - -
-==
=
_ _ _ = _ -=g==..
--=q
- - - :=
- J
=== _...
.2:
=
=
-e
=
p::: =;=
=.
- n:n rst=t=
,2.._=.___.:=
=_. _._____.
q_.
._4
.,._a..._
...4
.,_.4,__
.a..
~
,..L
.m ~'-t- } t-+ --,.
{
-tv-,...
+m T
- - - - - + --e
-n
--++
- 1 r
i i,
-+ ;
,.t.-
i i;
-~t-7
+~
m i;
i,,
Ti
-+-
t
~
4._..
_+.
y.
13
__~
..-4..-p 2
=
_ q
._~ _ _,
,_ +.
.p
_.s 9
l
. f 4,._.
p j.
a 8
_.a._
-t_
- , s
~. _f
}._.
7
.. 1. l_ : n
)
u
.=_=.=.=_-.:.u..=_u==5,===--
.. _7. : =s.._-- v =~- f== _.;=
. t=
= r.
=
- .=.. =
==
- m==
.p.
_..= = p_ =_= := _ _,
=. g;j
_
.=.1_.
_ =
= =
g
_ _. ~}Q; y
- . -- e = :=-
o,;5 _ _ _ - _...
.n.p p t--
- r.
. r
.._.,,.,, _t.
__r:_... _.._.t___._
c.
m_.,_...
_1
._..a,..L.
-p
_ g _4_.
.._m c/
._....._._._...g_
..,y- %, _
1
_z. _.
.u.
._.....d...............{..
- n..
3 q
. + _:
. =~T =.x, __=_vt =. _=.. =__.t =._. = -.::..
, =. = _. ~. ~ _... - - -...}..-
_-4=..
a....._..
.._.t.
g
.._- _- :2 C
=. =.. =.. _-t..=..=.=.t=._.=._.
._=.-
-=)M-r_a ~
t=.
. z-
- T---
nr a::=1- =-
. =
-t :
.9
-i: !==
=L _
.=_
._.,=~:
1=
y
. = _,..
1 s
-_~.
v s
.. p.
v,,=
. m,e j<
w,. r.
.-~
,,_ __..f.
.n-w.,s_.rc.
37 7,(
-~.S.--
g
,jl : '-._u n.: :
- 13
-,. _. + __.+.+
~
4._ v#
- y j
j g_
s._.
g _
p
._._.a j.
g_
. _. v _,,,_.gt
.....;=
=
2.. 2. m r==f u= =
.2.-
=
-=rf:
l
.=2m
..,uMbeim.
2
. _=22 -.
a..m m
=.m:.
a 5
~ ~
- t
.. _m*-::=r - ; *= L- = = )nnt ~ r
- . :.c.. _
-n:nt__
- rr =l
= :l:
=
.== =
=._._r _
- ,. = _=_.l:}:- 4......
.. 3.......
- i== =r_.__. !._._n~'}=. }=_=__2_. _._._ _
._:=...
g....
__. 7_.. g
_..,... _.._-t._._....
_ }.~_
e_.
.. p_
4
_4 _
_l:
d_...._ _.l
=..
.n..n.=. _
- n....=.. ~.r. f r. i:.
.........1 s_.
- 3
....+
=...:=. ::.n. =. =..n jr._...:...
. =....~: d...
.. ) 1.. : = r 3
.. _.3.:.:::.
.t,.....
- ' f:
. =;=f _:n. *=127
- t
- m
- ~= :'---..
- =
==
. 21 7
- O ! =._ ****$**" '.:
- ' C_*$
' m: :CJ:O" Z*.** *~!4:~
- C.!
.w 22$:.
. ~; Z : - "
~~*r0 Il r::
- f-r*. r* ~~-
--!* n *.
i.
-. 4
+++.-
.. 4...
P._
4
-,_o 4..
.. +.
~..
p.
~.,.
_y 1,.
.,7
^*'
^
~
3..
...t..,
. m.
i*"
' * * + '
- ~*~* !-" *'-
~*"~
~
~
~
-t~TT' 1
T***
i.,
-Y. ; ;
- T+*
T;;i iii. 7t++' *tr
- +1
't"
!!" T 1
2 3
4 5 6 7 89M 2
3 4
5 6 7 8 910 2
3 4
5 6 7 8 913 f
t 1
10 100 Requency (Hz)
FB/V CUSTOMER AXIS k8 LOCATION NO.
SPECIMEN P' 7 D B E S/N TEST RUN NO.
1 I
.t
- - _m k
FERMI UNIT 2 l
Project #6139-40 l
SARGEDT&!.UUDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC hEMDFile fj8 QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 1 of 6 l
J FERMI NUC'. EAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDIS0N COMPANY BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION SUMARY EQUIPMENT NAME:
KCU-17 SINGLE TIER BATTERY RACK EQUIPMENT NO. :
RB32S003 SPEC. NO.: 3071-82 RB325004 LOCATION: AUXILIARY BUILDING ELEV. 643'-6" EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
@] ACTIVE PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
1.
Corporate Consulting and Development Co. Qualification Report #A-119-77
. Dated June 1, 1977.
2.
Sargent & Lundy Report SL-2682 Dated September 27, 1974, containing Response Spectra.
3.
CD Batteries Div. Dwg. #M-6586 Dated 11-8-77.
4.
CD Batteries Div. Dwg. #K-5282-1 Rev. 10-24-77.
5.
CD Batteries Div. Dwg. #K-5098-1 Rev. 9-16-74.
6.
CD Batteries Div. Dwg. #K-5281-1 Rev. 10-24-77.
7.
DECO Dwg. #6E721-7833-10 Rev. D Dated 10-10-80.
8.
DLCo Dwg. #6E721-2833-12 Rev. G Dated 1 2h-81.
9.
DECO Dwg. #6E721-2833-2 Rev. C Dated 12-20-79.
Piepared by:
(LL h.
Date: 7-N-8[
Date:
l Reviewed by:
Date:
Approved by:
1
_ - _ _ I
j I
l FERMI UNIT 2-Project #6139-40 l
SARGEEIToi,UQDY L
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC
/ EMD File #
i
~
Page 2 of 6 TMTp QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
(
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
1 ENVELOPE (DBE, OBE) + DEAD WT ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
The KCU-17 Single tier battery rack is qualified using a simplified dynamic analysis.
This simplified dynamic r.nalysis takes advantage of the similarity of the KCU-17 Rack to the LC-15 Rack. The LC-15 Rack was caalyzed using a detailed finite element response spectrum dynamic unalys!s.
The similarity of the KCU-17 Rack and the LC-15 Rack allow the dynamic behavior of the KCU-17 Rack to be cha-acter-ized by the same mode shapes and approximately the came degree of modal interaction, although the natural frequencies for cach mode shape are different. The simplified model is used to calculate the modal frequencies for the KCU-17 Rack.
(Velidation of the simpli-fied model is accomplished by calculating the modal frequencies for the LC-15 Rack and comparing them to the detailed dynamic model).
The larrrst DBE floor response spectrum acceleration whic'a exists at or above the smaller of the transverse and longitudinal frequencies described above was determined for both the N-S and E-W rurves.
These two values were combined by the SRSS (square root of the sum of the squares) method to determine the worst possible horizontal response of the KCU-17 rack.
The worst possible vertical response was determined by the largest DBE floor response spectrum which exists at. or above the fundamental frequency described above.
By using the horizontal and vertical accelerations determined above end multiplying by a static coefficient to account for medal inter-action, a conservative static stress analysis was performed to qualify the KCU-17 battery rack.
I conservative value for the appropriate determined by comparing the results of the static static coefficient m
and dynamic stress analyses of the LC-15 battery rack.
I e.
~
- 1 FERf41 UNIT 2 Project #6139--40 i
i 11 l
SARGEUTal.UDDY l
EQUIPMENT DYNAf41C EMD File.#
f j
Page 3 of 6
}
'mmmac4 QUALIFICATION SUMf4ARY C D-41C AGO g g
q
_f f.
to QUALIFICATION SUtif4ARY OF EQUIPf4ENT I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
3.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR O l
2.
NSSS:
General Electric BWR X 3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
KCU-17 SINGLE TIER BATTERY RACK 1.
Scope:
O NSGS B BOP 2.
Model Number:
KCU-17 Quantity: 2 ASSEMB.
TS 3.
Vendor:
C&D Batteries Division 4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No.
of the devices included:
Not Applicable 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
Cross-breced structural steel framework N 2595 LB.
Dimensions: 11'-6. 7 5" X 21. 7 5" X 18. G
Weight : CELLS-4633C LB.
i 6.
Location: Building:
Auxiliary Elev.:
643'-6" t
7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
@ Bolting: Number: 4 PER LEG Size: 1/2"-13, STUD Welding: Weld Tyep:
Pitch:
Leg:
Length: __
0 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
21 HZ Side to side :
74 HZ Vertical:
31 HZ 9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
O Laboratory Test
-D
@ Analysis O Other 10.
a.
System in which located: DC Distribution System b.
Functional description:.
Provide D.C.
power for outside primary containment isolation valves c.
Equipment required for:
X Hot Standby X Cold Shutdown X Post LOCA
=.
l FERMI UNIT 2' l Project #6139-40 i
SARGEi1T&LUflDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
J QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 4 of 6 uN m 8E"*-
l C H eC AGO g
11.
Pertinent reference design specifications:
3071-82 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes C No IV.
EQUIPMENT OUALIFICATION METHOD: C Test
@ Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis 1.
Qualification Report Seismic Analysis Report of KCU-17 a.
Title:
Sincie Tint nnernrv R n c t-b.
Number and Date:
A-119-77 Dated June 1, 1977 Corporate Consulting 2.
Company that prepared report: and Develennent 3.
Company that reviewed report:
Detroit Edison V.
VIBR? TION INPUT:
l.
Loads considered: @ Seismic only O nyarodynamic only O Seismic and Hydrodynamic C Other (Specify):
O 2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
S&L Report
- 2682 - Figures B-9, B-10, B-33, B-34, C-7, C-17 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
O Absolute Sum SRSS Basis for damping: NRC Reg. Guide 4.
Damping Upset (OBE)J 1% _ _
Emerg. (SSE) : 2%
1.61 5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required):
ZPA G Other (Specify):
See Note Upset (OBE) : F/B=
S/S=
V=
021.4 HZ Emerg. (SSE) : F/B=
.42g S/S=
.42g V=
2.85n 6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
@ No NOTE:
ENV of SSE and OBE Loads was used.
Stresses were compared to OBE allowables.'
- ~. -
'o
[
1 FERMI UNfT 2
{ Project #6139-40 i
l SARGENT&l.Ui3DY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC l EMD File #
inn:smu=xa i
c ruc ^oo OUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
' age 5 of 6 l
VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
[] Single frequency:
[] Multiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: [] Single axis 7
[] Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test docs TRS envelop RRS?
[] No
[] Yes (attach TRS graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
j Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
[] Bolting :
Number:
Size
((] Welding :
Weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 0
8.
Functional operability verified:
Yes
[] No
[] Not applicable 9.
Test results including modifications made:
10.
Other tests performed: --
VII.
IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis Static anctlysis
@ Static coefficient analysis (Simplified Dynamic)
[] Dynamic analysis:
[] Response spectrum Time history 2.
Medcl type:
X l-dimensional
[5} 2-dimensional
[] 3, dimensional
1
_ _ _._, _ -. c.a. m..
o Y
S N
FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 i
d SARGENT&LU30Y EQUIPMENT DYN/J:IC EMD File #
iCNQiNC'::ltS - j
?
cscroo QUALIFICATION SUM;MRY Page 6 of 6 3.
Method of analysis:
Q Computer-aided calculation Programs used: FRAME 2D (Validated usinn Stardyne)
@ Hand calculhtions
=
4.
Have equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
] Yes No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
i Calc Allow Element Stress Stress 1.
Maximum Frame Member Normal Stress 15.5 KSI 18.0 KSI 2.
Diagonal Brace Tensile Stress 1.4 KSI 18.0 KSI 3.
Maximum Tie Rod Normal Stress 6.7 KSI 18.0 KSI 4.
Vertical Supports Rail Bending Strest 14.6 KSI 18.0 KSI 5.
Horizontal Restraint Rail Bending Stress 3.4 KSI 18.0 KSI S.
Maxit um Anchor Bolt Shear Stress 7.1 KSI 12.0 KSI 7.
Maximum Anchor Bolt Tensile Stress 4.1 KSI l 38.6 KSI 6.
Deflection evaluation at critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress No critical deflections VIII.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
NO COMMENTS
-r w
w w
v V '
&._m
~f g
's CLIENT DETROIT EDIS0li 9
DATE __Avil 16, JOB NO 39E
(
EI!RICO FEIGil tQ h N?.f.b[)haf PROJECT
. 1972 OUII
[
DESIGH BY U N Q l N O G plu ->
CHECKED BY HHS DATE d' ' ? I S H E E T _ _._ O F tj 2
'l p
t, II t
O E
- D
'4"
' " ' j' '
- h*
g J m,d i
e I
/*
/
i -
ii LI j +i,O o
p I
.)-
d '.-...[._t..gj j 1 :: T, l
I c..
. 'll i
I
/ _.l..._ m{-;;l --
O C.
C O
1-n n r 1
M,
-i H
r c-w
.. i i "..
~
i i
g I
I :
5._. $
~
.-a C
j e
l~,
g lil a
-3 L
s *a
%L i
Tv $
N 05 l
.'L I
i
\\ !
h3 i
\\
k
\\
\\
f l
!!il ! 2 b
f
-l M, m l-vrfyl
. }iQ P..
l
,\\
i
~.
1 l
. ! i 1.i ul I
u_ i_4...
p
' y._ _... _
- + --,3
- -.8-4 t
t f
]
I I
Y l
j r... a_, a
, 1 6
b l j j
'.,}
l l l
..{
._.t_....
l 1
l l i
?
l -.i. s l l 1
i e
i
- ~_
y- -
i ll, _'
) l 1
L
- 4._
8 i
i..
i li, i : 1 0.-
i j
i j
i 8
l_ _ __
. j g. r--+
l.'4 i l i
i.
g 9
t.
r-
,7 I1 i
e.
ii,i:
,!,:i
- loi, i.,, lor, 11,,
i 1 ;
in:
,,,i1mi :>,i,
.io, 9 6 4 4 i
e...i..
- 2 33
-M 3
a s
s sons wnnu
' FIGURE B-9
s.
HORIZONTAL FLOOP. RESPONSE SPECTRA
I' CRATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - G41'-6" (SLAB NO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING NORTH - SOUTH COMPONENT e
e i.
CLIENT DETROIT EDTSOM ig L
ENRICO FMU11-jog so_ wq PROJEC1 jg
.j. h[bg"jQP DATE Anril 18. 1tg2 1
I d
DESIGH BY I
aCNCINGUFIO
' CHECKED 3Y HHS
_ DATE
- d. ' ? /W SHEET _ OF
'.7
. f.
f
.y N
1*
p>s r,
wy d
s1 3
- . ?
3 3
S m mN m N
r.
n 8 8 s
. / ~,
T y, -
- . E 11..
7
....g.l
- g, ymirm*,..
.m 0
~
-}.
/.
i s
l
[
i
.. t. '.a -
g l
_. _ _ l
'.c '
l
,2, i
_ _4._,. }....:j.;,.
m g
f
- l i i -
l c;
o o
- s l
_[
_..,.T1,i a
=
jj' i.tj j
l MI k-1 r-1
-1 g
g g
p a
~
1
.t r ;
.__ }
o n
e m
i E
n n w 4
i
. j I
j;-
g,!
I
-o (si n
i i
y.
g' i
j
.i.
J 1
e I
8
__ y _,
~
g Wi r
Q *t. sMlI; l
8 y
1 I --- g.
- -} ; #
h
[
.m ;
t I;i I,....
1 s
.i 3
r
} '. _x
.1.1.
1, s
4 a
i-
._ 4
. L
.n I.
i 4
1 i.
.... ~
l
/
e r
m t
9
- 1..
1 l
N l
- __-- m s s
.,. w 1.. -l t
s
...._,s a
I j
\\
--,..__.;,,,... 3..
..,... a 8
I
- 1 I
...... 4
-<... ~.
2
^l l i
~
lI l
i 4
l
.i
.,,.., n.
...t.1,
,k y
y0
$ N $
3 3
3 N
S S 9
N S 8 8 L wa s ww.mv FIGURE D-t 0 HOPl2ONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA h
OPEFtATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE ELEVATION - G41'-G" (SLAB NO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILI ARY BUILDING EAST - WEST COMPONENT
A CLIENT DETROIT EDISON.
S!4MP!TS W*"im
PROJECT FIII?ICO FFiGII JO B NO 9" f.c.
DESIGH BY SUN DATE_M d.?_1H; 1979 I
>GNGINuunn CHECKED El HHS DATE 4/l? _ZE SHEET __.,_ OF
.~.....i=i 45.
n n
- E 2
3:
=
=
n d
'q nii
.1 n
.__'?
/
)
//
~
,9fyV
[
///V I I!i
, -i '
i i
l I
i4 i
/4//
e e
c r
~
Y. Y h
f) f 1
e e
=
< >.1 i>>.
o >
4 l
s l
~
il l
1
~
' s. / _ k, \\_...!
-j S 1
i s
y.
t
._.._. 4_..1 i
j
[ ///I i_
i i
.,l
((/'
I
,.j.-_-['.
i L.
a 4
i l
/ '/'/
I Il
---M l :i !
/3
^
s
-- 9.-
l l-
.l
- Il.
a
.m
/
I
.c 1
._w!. _ p'_2._. -
i l
s
(
~
I
/,
jll
/
d_'.
n
,/ ;
i i
/
r-N
- .9 I
/
/
/
i
/
/
i i
'I
/
s f
m
\\
s W. (.d'_T
. li j
i
., i N
~
j
~N i
h l
~
~
a
-- -l--
1-L - - *l-4 j
I I;
[
f,
! -tM
!3 fI
_ f., p.
I i
4
- 4...,
_b j.4 I i
I
.._{l_. _ _._;....]. _. $_. - f
~
l.
l'I I
~
fI I
l..
I !
l a
- g
.3 1
i l
7-j N I
i i
i l 1 I._.i.__ +
J. _
_1. __ <i
..i
,i 3 I
I l
'.1
=
l
[
,. 4., a 1
1____.
_4 t.
~
l I
l I, i.. i 'j i;
ll 4
8 t
i
.3 l
L.
.:,,,,i,1
,;,1 ' a r.
,i,1,',
i.,,
m,,
,k y
y3 30 0 w
.a
.4 2
4 d.
k ivon s wn.nn FIGURE B-34 HORIZONTAL FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA DESIGN BASIS EARTHOUAKE ELEVATION - 641'-6" (SLAB 'JO. 3)
REACTOR AUXILIARY BUILDING EAST - WEST COM PONENT 9
CLIENT DETROIT EDISON 7_
EiiRICO FERMI jos no_ 3ces PROJECT o b g j T g i y "'j g f a
DESIGN BY 5GM DATE Anril 18, 1 ag a
-iCNGINCCRO OiECKED BY80 DATE 4/IW 7I-SHE ET ___. OF 3
E E:
- 3 3 a
s ae e n e
9 e
n 8 8 8 w
ui,
,o..
.4 n
- _.j s l; -
,t s l
, 2
..g -.;l
.g
~
i i !
~.
l
- l. 'l i..
i
____ t._....L; !
i I
l l _... '
1.!
._.- 4 4.,;..
- 1 l.
l
,4 l
- ,/.
i l
I
// ';
0
- ',,/ /i :
1 i
o.. o.
oc 2
T.r-ftfa p f,
!^^~
j
~~
I a
c (1< 4 a1 Qil d Q ] %
a a na
- /
a e
O s
y
(
p q tn l
l
/;, _ j m
s-u 1
j... _s 6
y -
t i
i l
i
/
{
l l.
_ f..
I.- -. _. 1 a
e i
m c---- r,,
i
+ - - - - - - '. ' *. *. -.
i
,s s
i i
i i
17 >'
ll}
t i -..i l
'p.-
- i. 4 l
_ __.; s.
.._g._.___..
.l
'l l1 l j
l' 4
83
- , jl j e
4 I
I s
2.u...
.q n
l..
}
.i i
4 i
i l
tI t !p 1 11 I 1 1
.f iit 1 I t i_
t (tge t, tt 9 t ff1i ff 1 t t'
?
I t
.t*?
4 i g
k 2
hE 30 :
3 0
5 0
S 7 S
N 9
9 6 4
l.
son 5 wwmem FIGURE C-7 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERAT!NG BASIS EARTHOUAKE REACTOR BUILDING
' SLAB EL. 641'-G", 659'-G" 5 G84'-6" k
DETROIT EDISCI4 CO, CLIENT E RICO FETif JOB No-
{8d[enh-nmp a prinjf PP,OJECT iu (J l @gl LWiJ2.8 DESIGN BY SGII DATE Arril S.
ic72 i D N QiN U.3 A C -
OiECKED BY._f.iHS DATE 4/ls/72-SHEET ___. OF s
?
I i
o
.l 1
2 8 8 8
- M M
y E
E 3 S
M
=
=
o
d e
.,,I.
i > ' i g > ' ' ' ;.. ' ' ', ' i ' i a
<>2.
1
-1,,,
1.,,
..r
!,i ; i -i i;.
j l- --+-. O
- + -
~
t j ~
t a
}'.
\\\\ :
... u.;_.
i i
s
..s--+--.-
4... :
~
1 l
......i
.q I
\\
_i....l.- i. b -
i I
! '. I l
1
... s_-s-.. a <
d
. i..
i l
y 1
1 i.
g w
Q:>00
~
~
.s..:
y
[
4 J
Hma
< 2 <,-'@~
g,,
.t tit
~
"eu i
= *
- i 1
OOOO
[l,.' [*
n d
i l
l
.~.
i S
l 12.'tR., 31 l
e tr N injo
.,4 i
e--
/
~
l t
i
\\
j
\\
\\
1 l
l a
\\.,. \\
I J **
i s
6
~ - - + - - - +. * *
~
g
._ l
_ i 8
~
l
' I T
i l
~
!\\
.l.
, - d.
4 t
l t
3,,
__m I ;'.
I i
,,,,__,,g
(
~
l l
l I
s' "%
}
i.
l l
-1 i
r I
e
=
i
,~
m.
g
~
I i i>N t
, 3 4
-}
t
~
t f
I l
g
. n T
g s
9 i
e i
t :
I ;
- +,
....t,
,i,
,m, i,..
a
- w a
n a
a
- q 5
3, A
T o
o o
o e
o g
g g
.a m as win...sv I
FIGURE C-17 VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA P
DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR BUILDING SLAB EL. 641'- 6', 659'-6" 5 684'-5' t
h A
s
=
s
-^?Mpr3EE.
L FERMI UNIT 2 f Project #6139-40 g
}'
SARGEDT&LUDDY l
EQUIPMENT DYilAMIC k EMD File #
gqi5g 00ALIFICATIO!1 SUMilARY Pago 1 of 6 FERMI fiUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DETROIT EDIS0N COMPANY 3
i BALANCE OF PLANT i
EQUIPMEllT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATI0tl
SUMMARY
i l
~
EQUIPl4ENT NAME: Nuclear Penetration Canister Assembly EQUIPMENT NO. : See Reference 3 SPEC. NO.: 3071-74 LOCATION: Reactor Bldg.
Elev. 603 '-3." to 604 '
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION:
(~] ACTIVE O PASSIVE QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT
REFERENCES:
i 1.
Conax Corp. Report, Stress Analysis for Nuclear Penetration Canister Assembly, Rev. C, dated 4-19-74, DECO File #E5-284.
(
2.
Conax Corp. Report, Seismic Analysis of Electrical Penetration Assemblies, dated 1-16-74, DECO File #ES-335.
a 3.
DECO Dwg. Nos.:
6E721-2831-8 Rev. B Dated 3-24-74 6E721-2831-21 Rev. A Dated 7-30-80 6E721-2831-22 Dated 4-12-75 4.
S&L Report #SL-2682 containing applicable response spectra.
l l
l l
1 1
l i
l l
_ _ _ _ _, _ = _ _.
i Prepared by:
7#nHL4-bW Date:
7~ l'! ~ b [
q
! Reviewed by:
Date:
1 I
I Approved by:
Date:
g i
y
_a
1 E
FERMI UNIT 2 Project #6139-40 l
SA11GEUTSLUGDY f
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
f j
Ti$g*f;T-QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
lPage2of6 l
J t_.
QUALIFICATI0fl
SUMMARY
LOAD COMBINATIONS CONSIDERED:
1.
Pr6ssure + Dead Load + OBE + Jet Force 2.
Pressure + Dead Load + SSE + Jet Force ORIGINAL QUALIFICATION METHOD:
The penetrations were qualified by analysis using the maximum values
-from the applicabic seismic response spectra. These values were used because the first natural frequency of the penetrations were between 8 IIz.nnd 20 llz (lateral and vertical).
Pressure, dead load, and jet force were considered in the analysis.
(;
i f-o i
f A
t
-.,--,7--m,,-r,
,-3, n-g.y,-
,m, 7-
,,g--_-,-.m
,__,,_44-
,-r.w,-a n,
,.,,-n-
._m,,-,,,y
.-,r
-n u
)
p
_.9, Project #6139-40 FERMI UNIT 2 l
I SARGEDT&l.UUm/
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
1 1
'maina m u
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 3 of 6-1 l
c.-ocroo g QUALIFICATI0:1 SUMM: RY OF EQUIPMENT-I.
PLANT NAME:
FERMI - Unit 2 TYPE:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison Company PWR 2.
NSSS:
3.
A/E:
Detroit Edison /Sargent & Lundy II.
COMPONENT NAME:
4 Nuclear Penetration Canister Assembly i
1.
Scope:
O NSSS g i3oP 2.
Model Number:
Not Applicable Quantity:
23 t
i 3.
Vendor: Conax Corp.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name ano model No.
of the devices included:
Not Applicable 5.
Physical Description Appearance:
Flanged Tubular Penetration
{.
Dimensions : 19" x 19" x 113-1/4" 1.ong Weight: See Ret. 3.
l 6.
Loc :-tion : Building: Primary Cont.inment Elev. : 603 '-3" in_
604' 7.
Field Mounting Conditions:
O Boltin9: number:
size:
y Welding: Weld Tyep: _.
Leg:
Length:
Pitch:
j 8.
Natural frequencies in each direction:
Front to back:
269 IIz (utn.)
Side to side :
8 Ilz (min.)
Vertical:
8 IIz (min.)
9.
Method of determining natural frequencies:
1 O Laboratory Test
@ Analysis Other 10.
a.
System in which located:
See Reference 3 b.
Functional description:
Provide Containment Isolation j
for electrical feedtbrounbs
.c.
Ec,uipment required fer:
e
@ liot Standby
@ Cold Shutdown
@ Post LOCA i
.. _... ~.., _ _.. _ _ _ _,... - _ _ _. _. _ _. - _. _.,.. _, _., _
~
-m-
= - _ - _
I FERMI UNIT 2 i Project #6139-40 i
1 SARGEUTfdl.URDY j
EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
i Page 4 of 6 rRNmNms 1
C HIC AGO j
___ J
_ _ _ _ =
_=n
.31.
Pertinent reference design specifications: 3071-74 III.
IS EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANT: @ Yes O No IV.
EQUIPME!iT OUALIFICATION METHOD:
Test
@ Analysis O Combination of Test and Analysis ualWcat{$-8Nt[eks Analysis for NuclearPenetratio nCanister Assesbiv a.
Title:
IPS-88 Seismic Analysis of Electrical Penetration Assemblies b.
Number and Date: f[>k h! f-N:N 2.
Company that prepared report: conax corp.
l 3.
Company that ieviewed report: R. M. Parsons Co., Detroit Edison V.
VIBRATION INPUT:
1.
Loads considered: O Seismic'only O Hydrodynamic only i
X Seismic and Hydrodynamic 0 Other (Specify) :
2.
Required response spectra (attach the graphs):
i B-19, B-20, B-43, B-44, C-2, dated 4-12-72, C-12, dated 4-15-72 3.
Method of combining Requiring Response Spectra:
O issolute Sum O SRSS 4.
Damping Upset (OBE) : J/2% Basis for damping :NRC Reg.
i Emerg. (SSE): 1%
Guide 1.61 5.
Required acceleration in each direction (if required) :
f ZPA O Other (Specify) :
l Upset (OBE) : F/B=1.06 /1.0 S/S= 1.0.'1.06 V=
.59 Emerg. (SSE) : F/B= 1.33/1.13 S/S= 1.13/1.33 V=
.51 6.
Were f atigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
i O Yes Describe loads and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
i X No k
. -r j
1 y
4 "i
l i
j FERMI UNIT 2
" Project #6139-40 SEGEDTE4LUDDY EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
IcNCIN25MS QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
Page 5 of 6 cme ^oo
)
i-m i-
-- I i
VI.
IF QUALIFICATION BY TEST, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Test Method:
Single frequency:
liultiple frequency:
2.
Input Motion: O Single axis 4
O Multi axis 3.
No. of qualification tests:
j j
Upset (OBE)
Emerg. (SSE) 4.
Frequency range:
5.
For multiple frequency test does TRS envelop RRS?
No Yes (attach TRS. graphs) 6.
Input g-level test:
Upset (OBE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
Emerg. (SSE)
F/B:
S/S:
V:
7.
Laboratory mounting:
p C Bolting:
Number:
Size O welding:
weld type:
Leg Length Pitch 8.
Functional operability verified:
0 Yes No O not applicable 9.
'Iust results including modifications made-10.
Other tests performed:
i l
VII.
1 IF QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS, THEN COMPLETE:
1.
Type of analysis O Static analysis X Static coefficient analysis O Dynamic analysis:
O Response spectrum O Time history 2.
Model type:
@ l-dimensional 2-dimensional O 3-dimensiona1 l
l t
._.---....m__,,
p~
o FERMI UNIT 2 SARGEUT&LUDDV j Project #6139-40 EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC EMD File #
ic u c m e r n a
.l 1
emic4oo i
QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
z_
kva-=ge 6 of 6 Pa b
=smuero er_ --
3.
Method of analysis:
Computer-aided calculation programs used:
8 Iland calculations 4.
Iiave equipment supports been adequately considered in analysis:
{ Yes O No 5.
Stress evaluation at critical structural elements:
Adow ac Element Stress Stress Canister' Tube (DW+ PRES +SSE+ JET) 21.5 KSI 26.0 KSI (S,i)
Flange Bolts (DP+ PRES +SSE+ JET) 18.4 KSI 27.5 KSI (S)
Flange llob Be.iding (DW+ PRES +SSE+ JET) 15.1 KSI 26.0 KSI
['
6.
Def.loction evaluation at. critical structural elements (active equipment only)
Calc Allow Element Stress Stress No critical deflections necessary for calculation.
VIII.
ADDITT.ONAL COMMENTS:
No Comments 4
IETROIT TOIS0i!
~
CLIENT PROJECT.___E!!RICO FE' I
__ jos nO %E!B
]'W[ f]D *]Q E Egj{.,jf DESIGN BY Mi DATE /m !'il 171. 1972 I
DATE _A/ E/71 SHE ET __. OF -
C2OINCCAD,
CHECKED BY _hH3
(.-..
U' e e
~
r.
- - E 8 6 U
E E'
5
-m7.v r]o w
- _n i.
i, o..
lI I
3.g_. 3
.l 3
.{.
i.,
.,.... p
.. m
.. i
__.___t._,
I {
j l
O o
l l
l l 1.
- t..
.a
.4 3
li ! I, ni H
M' i
1
- a. 1
.._..q. 4.9.g...o q
N t
.4 e.
[ b. h.
4
____.4'.....-
G C
t i
i c
~
4' 't 3
l l
j i
j 7
Q __. a
,.g_--.-.
3 y
I i
i
~
' 'l
[
'i b
1
_ 1<i
~ _. -.
I A
.N i
y.
e.
[
r
%'W 9,
l
._7._.
. _i_......;
\\
v
-t i
g I.
j i
i
_.1,..
t i
u
.i i
i
! l 1
I i i 6
i j
- _L. _. y 1
l 1 l
-.i.
. 4 i
i l i i
.}
.~
i n
l
~
l
.....,s.
t_-
1 i
I i
i 1
i l
l
. *. r, t
A
. _7.
.. L..
l..
g I
1 1
I l
*I'1'2 1 -
T-
I' N
9 2
6
- L R
2 2
3 0 a
a u
w swns wmew F~lGURE B-19
{-
HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE DRYWELL CONTAINMENT 6'-O DELOW RPV INVERT NORTH-SOUTH COT.1PONENT f
S
CLIENT DETROIT FDISO!!
SARGEDT&LUDBY
- gsc;yfis "'1ep u d W& "
CNCINDCP1D -
CHECKED BY _h DATE d.I W 71 SHEET _ OF
[C I
1 z !!
E E:
a n
3-a s.
ss,
~
.,w 4....
....j.i1 j,
,a t
li t!
_ _ j c.
e i.. s i
a
l t.j, l
lj i+t 4-l 1
...__4 l
!l.
i.
l l
d t*:
i r-
=
4 94 4.;
4 i.
c.
n
/
I I
l' ! ! l 8
F H
3
- r..-.. j,. j i. 1..
s g
l b _[
l f_._
le1 l
i.
<C
__.I.
n
[.
l: !
t AB g
>)_
r.; w
=_
\\
p 1
a i
I I
5 J
[ h.w) t p,.,;
.' 2
~
i y
S I '
.i e
g S.$
I l
o g
g.
~~
T.'. ~~~ -
' ~ ~ ^ ' ~ ' ' ~ '
i
. i.,
l J
l' j
e 2
i r..+
}
f L
I I
e l
l - '
j l
I 8
. i
.L..
s g
8 1
i li l i
l l i I i i l..
..i
.g__._.._._,r.
j.-
.9 i
i j
a b
i j
i I
l_._.$
i
...a l
i I
p l
1
-. _.. i._.
~
I i
l.
s n
1 k
i l
,,ir!in.
I'
'ir, nia i i
it.
1
- ris,
.ir 1
i a g.
k 2' ' ' ' y' ' 0 0% 0 3
3 5
3 S
N
- 'i 4 8 4
T>
R *L
~
b suuns ww.mnn n
FIGURE B--20
( (
1P HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA N
OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE DRYWELL CCNTAINMENT G'-0" BELOW RPV INVERT EAST-WEST COM PONENT P
!b e
t
CLIENT DEri(OIT FBINGlT
- c.. h h.
I DATE.lbril 18. 1>2
.[
9 ES
.Y COIN;2CC4C OfECKED DY HHS DATE q/lb/71 SHEET _. OF
~.
i c
n 8 8f.
..."....i-
.4 d
a n
- n ea m n
2 E
U =,
, =, =, 0 1 -
9 ;...
/
Il-
- f...,,.
s/
/
, }
-j -j 3
// -
6 6 I
./2
.4 4
I
_4 _
(({
d.
t g..;.
. _s y.. q.3 a
a
/i
'l, !,-
3 H
H Z
n.
n.
+l l
I'
}.
kf kj 3
R 2
i '! !
U
}
p A
- /
1
/
f
~
e d
g g
/
tj, ;
a J
i i
r r
N
/
I Ll _;..
I 2
/
>(t '
k, L'
~
m a
-4 E
N E
%w
_4 J _!
-. _!.. __.1.yl e. I
[
g N
i t
j'! !
-i -
4 i !
-1 N
s
~_
Ni 1i
- i 'i i. _ 2..... -
8 a
I i
i i
,_2.,
a j
l I
i l
u.
t a
I I
i i
. -- W, 4 l
+
i b
l l l
p 4
i i
t
,....... ; s.
a
,1, j
..4s a_
a ljl l! l m
~
I
?
A iI A i 11 1 I t
t i
1 !I f
Ittt t t I 1 iffi 1I i t i
I f
f f
I 1ff I t f f 1111 1 -
1.
g i t
i 2
3:
- 3 a
n n
s "
S 9 '
P-8 A
s.
g
=uns.w *er,
. i FIGURE B-43 HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA.
l DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE DRYWELL CONTAINMENT G'-O" BELOW RPV INVERT NORTH-SOUTH COM E2ONENT o
.l. If.
w
/
'i m
~._
Cu2NT DETROIT EDIS0ti m ojgc7 ER y FERMI JODNO 3988 L
'SAdGFUT&LUD!3Y M
DC5:Cil CY bGM DATE Anr11 18, 19/2 CNCINSOAO-OlEC;ED DY MO DATE 4/10/ 7Z MiEET -._ 0F l
~
r.
n n
& c.,
2 0
si n en n
..............i.,>>,igga 9
ni.
d, 2 l'
/,-
f y3 3
/
4 -1 i
.1, -
t
/
h 4
lI I._s J.
i
/;
l l!l 1
8 4.,. ]..,.. e e
M' _-ll ! -
9 9
//
I h
M M
'/ /
f 4
i!
i ;
i 1
Eh Eh I
i sa j
t.
n n
p 7._
r
'l!2 i
M W-l("fl I'
\\
M '/
ll2
[
al ;. ~. #
j N "'
.; i 74
.V i
r
~
u i
]
I N._. q
.3..._.
- 4.. ; -
[
3 ts. !
..s...-,....
i.
a
_ l 1
i i.
.l..
I I
5_..i
. C j s l
l,'
6
......-n i
j ;
..,..._.! s
.i..
'.1 t
.L-.
..' j
.a
. 4 ;;
st li3 l8 1,
2 4
1 i.;
i
.,21,*,i
,,,,1
.,,,ni,
, lit, n
1, i
in, iizi
,,i,
- iii, i
1, n
ni
- 9 O
N 5
S $
4 4 k
$U
$U U U
U C
U M suun6 w w ae w FIGURE B-44 HOR 12CNTAL CESPONSE SPECTRA 6
DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE DRYWELL CONTAINMENT G'-0"
',j k, b '
BELOW RPV INVERT EAST-WEST COMPONENT
<,o
(
j
CLIENT DL'TROIT EDISON "Mh"hh'g [']!]*f PeiOJECT E!!RICO FE!tMI JOB No. 3033 i
DESIGN BY. SCM DATE lipril i fl,._107?
2 0NGINOut%D -
OtECKED BY$i3 DATE. 0' 9/ 7-SHEET ___. OF--
e g r7 j>.w Trrr, i i i i r-
- rTrr, 1.,
rit.
1...
I!il I1 i<-
l j -t 5
0
<,'j (O J.
- .: :2..
s
,a ii l 6 l t/)
l i1 e,
451 q
. l.,._. 4 *;
,H,,. : r,a,
..._,_i.
je
.s.
i=
_[ _. l.'
4 h) f' g,,
L 7 --
._7 l
E-4 E-t O q '2 4
__.w.._
O l
l 4
p g
Q O ti)
.i l_____
_......,4 a
o
.a n: so
.~
l..
.e
.l
. _ _ _. - _ n. _....
fr. j -
e t
p
<i ao I
, cv s p: n :t:
i e
p p.
i H Id fd I
r'
'j '; '
h.3 o 2 h3 d 9.42 I.
- 7.e u.
,..____...2 g
t.
i r.
HM c.
.a., c.
r.
n: w s i
o e
c
_._.2__._._
_ _ q p q<,a,. 7 i... pl_! y' 3rw
_L
..c
/ !
1 i
,n' Md x' 7
i
-.i N
e l
' ev in l
a J _L_._
... L._ _...__x __-L L f..
.,l __.. _.J.,.. + ; --
i...,..!
.1y '
j _. _q.. _._ lJ
.__}._.p[_ [7
..y
- - -_. t
,a 1
t 4
. a.___
i i
.j l
I
'N Pg.. :\\_ /
i
!a t
g_c..
l __.,,7 i
i l
p-l a
l
-4 1
. ',.\\
l 3..
i i
,i l
i i Ii l
m t
4 l _ j _ p.. +
i i
l l
l!
Ijii' i
I i!
l I
I i i ! > o diu.d u.2.4 u i J.
a *e o >>iheiiiii 1 uto aiii i i i i... i i i i
.1 iiii u t
- t
'l
.s
' i d
2 2 u n
3 0
n.n s um..mu 1
FIGURE C-2 l
i VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA OPERATING DASIS EA,RTl! QUAKE J
RE'AC70R CONT. S!!! ELD EL. 583'-G", G13'-G" j
i
G Ct. TENT DETROIT EDISON.CO-e,coJECT HIRICO..E'.RMI
o n M E E -CC L'f L,80l,p 00i bp b.bp]igt
.0 i-d Desim ny_ ME om A rn n, m_
L iCNQlNuanta -
CiECKED BYI.il.iS DATE 4/.18/ 7.L SHEET _. OF J
a
=.
n 2 8 8
- f.,
9 9 5 m
B 5
.E :
a n
S
..~
6
'IiI
}
'l 1' M
. -j d
[
r.-
< [ ] (Q 5
n
.f.
3
,ii j ~-
M lI *C H
>-1 k.1,"l l,..] O lI* A t/)
h m --",-
5
- 33n, j*
ei e e.
b I
g
'4 f
-g.
.. f_ *... i i i
N fr.
. Ea E4 0 I-_
3'
]
l l
t t, iIi i.
i I
- ., 4 et i
l-I D IC CD
.a g
j
....a*
14 p
l s
__i.1
.. j -
7-
.W a s
!i pg s
d
.5 !! E-*
1 7 C.,' !.E.. pi
^t' W~
[0 lI; l ;
i g.
fle Hi H H
I,
.:..e 8
~
j HMW FM Yh pom c *j ih g M
E-i
.g t, uy.1 aco q
ml f ff f I t'
[r. A p
. \\.
- s-l.
t.
CC V) H w
~
e os FM M U
l
- p. ;
A
.l.
.....*.s, I
{
~
\\
')\\',
- c..M. l, n
r -.-.77.l s
E
(.
_.J.s..
. -.. ! } A.. -.
S I ! '
l
.,\\ 1
- w.
.J.e +...
,8
~
I' MN_!/
I
...._ l. :
l'L5..d.l___I...;..._['b.
la
~
\\
\\.
l_.I i
a l
y j 4.s 1
i li ll l
i.
4.
c i
l t
i
- i..
p; l
j ll ll I
.t
.t.
l 1 1
i 1,,,, :,
,,,,c,,,
t i, i,11 i.,t,Iiinni 1,.
,,,i
- iii, i.,,,,i,,
1 si g>
2 23
- % s a
a n
s e se s m
=
2 e.
e 4 e
inun s sw.m FIGURE C-12 b
s
' VERTICAL RESPONSE SPECTRA
\\.-
DESIGN DASIS EARTHQUAKE REACTOR CONT. SHIELD EL. 583'-6", 613'- 6" 3.
.