ML20009C139
| ML20009C139 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1981 |
| From: | Colbert W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009C140 | List: |
| References | |
| EF2-54067, NUDOCS 8107200317 | |
| Download: ML20009C139 (42) | |
Text
_-. _ _. _ _ _. _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _
Detroit 2000 Second Ave %e 31 3-0 July 13, 1981 EF2 - 54067 Mr. L. L. Kintner Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555
Reference:
Enrica Ferm1 Atcmic Power Plant - Unit 2 NRC Dociet No. 50-341
Subject:
" Qualification Sumary of Equipment" for SQPT
Dear Mr. Kintner:
Enclosed are three (3) copies of " Qualification Sunmary of "cuipment" for BOP and NSSS equipment--identified as items 1 through 25 in the letter of
{
July 7,1981 from your Mr. Tedesco to our Mr. Tauber.
If you have any questions, please contact our Yogi Anand at 313-649-7363.
Sincerely, W. F. Colbert Technical Director Enri., Fermi 2 hTC/YNA/jj Enclosures cc:
Dr. Morris Reich Department of Nuclear Ene.gy Building 129 Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973 810720031 810713 PDR ADOCK 05000341 A
\\
t i
Mr. L.'L. Kintner l
July 13, 1981.- EF2 - 54067 Page 2 i
i bec (w/encls):
M. Hassaballa (S&L)
D. Hopper (H&A)
P. Singh (GAI)
}
bec (w/o enclos): T. A. Alessi i
E. L. Alexanderson
-Y. N. Anand H. A. Balbale R. W. Barr M. L. Batch R. M. Berg E. R. Bosetti J. H. Cassiglia W. F. Colbert l
L. J. Frasson F. E. Gregor i
E. P. Griffing W. R. Holland
~
J. W. Honkala W. H. Jens C. M. Johnson (GE)
E. Lusis P. A. Marquardt L. E. Schuerman j
H. Tauber R. A. Vance l
A. E. Wegele J. E. Slider (NUS) i W. M. Street S. P. Zcma A/C Division File Document Control i
a i
k MPL Bil-0199 Qualificat-lon Su rary of Equip-ent 1.
Plaat Na e:
Fermi 2 pp,.
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison PG i
2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison g p 4-ya-6 I i
l II. Cc.conent Name T.,- n. n., u c Tubo 1.
Scope:
[x 3 N SSS
[ ] BDP 55 2.
Model Nu-ber:
117Cl41952 Qua nt ity:
3.
Vender:
GE 4.
If the co ponent is a cabinet or panel, nane and model No. of the devi:es included:
N/A S'.- Physical Description a.
Appearance tone. thin tube with flanCc D.
Dimensions 2" 0D x 330" long c.
Weight Approx.140 lbs. total l
6.
Loc at t er.
Building:
Reactor Elevation:
i 7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
- X] Weld (Length 6.3" ) circumferential
.J 8.
a.
Syste. in which lo:sted:
RPV & Internals (incore notitori b.
Functioial
Description:
Provide pressure bondace & support for incore instrumentation c.
Is the equipnent required for [] Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdoc.
I
[] Both
[x] Neither 9.
Pertinent P.eference Design Specifications:
21AS771 12/83 s
. 1
- 9.,
MPL Bll-C199
.y r
)
2 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plsnt: [] Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method:
. [ ] Test
[X3 Analysis
[ ] Cont >ination of Test and Analysis
, Qualification Report *:
Dar 147-B13D016-NY3-15 o (ho.. Title and Date)
Fermi New Loads Incore - Igl Co rany that Prepared Repcrt:,,gg____,___,___,,
Corpany that Reviewed Report:_ g; _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _, _ _, _ _,
V, Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered
- a. [ ] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [x] Cort >ination of (a) and (b)
(a) 2.
Method of Cort >ining RRS: [X] Absolute Sum [X3SRSS
[]75%iWipiliTD-3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 4.
Darping Corresponding to RRS: OBE
.01%
.021 5.
Required Acceleration in Each Dirtetion:
[ ] ZPA
[X3 Other (b)
(ipiiWy)
OBE S/S =
.75 g F/B =
(c)
V=
Small V=_
SSE S/S = _ m p___ _
F/B =
a 1
6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
i
[X3Yes
[ ] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
Loads considered were p,r,elsure (175 D,s,i) 10 OBE cy,cles and 7 Cy,c,les,/ eve _nt_ x _(11_0_0 + 1550 + 8750 events) =
s v 0
79810. Allowable 0 26000 psi is 10 cy,cl es.
' NOTE: If rore than one report couplete iters IV thru VII for each report.
12/80 (a) SRSS was used for N/ Upset calculations that have lower allowables.
Absolute sum was used for faulted and fatigue calculations.
(b) Values given are for first mode.
7 modes were considered for the Hsg gnd 9 modes for the guide tube.
(c) Model is 1-D.
The Max horizontal ARS was multiplied by 1.4 to account for both directions.
.n,..,.
7--
s'
'A MPL B~l-2I99 f
3 s
VI.
If Qualification by Test, then Co,glgey N/A random 1.
[ ] Single Frequeng
[3MJ1ti-Frequenn:
sine beat 2.
[ ] Sir.]1e Axis
[ 3 Multi-AKI5
~ ~ " ~ ~ ~
3.
No. of Qualificaticr.iests: OBE SSE Other 4.
Frequeny Range:
5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front / Sack, Vertical):
S/5 =, _ _ _ _ _
F/B = _
Y=
6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS 8 RR5 graphs)
[ ] No 8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/5 =
F/B =
V=
SSE S/S =
F/B =_
Y =_
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
) [3 1.
[ ] Bolt (No.
Size
) [ ] Weld (Length _
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
~~
II. Test Results including modifications made:
l l
- 12. Other test perforced (such as ti...ig or fragility test, including results):
l l
' Note:
If qualification by a conbination of test and analysis also cocplete Item VII.
4 12/80 /
i G
MPL Bil D199 g...
VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then co ;1ete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[X3 Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
5.4 Hz,17.4 HzF/B =
(a} _ _ _ _
V=
>l40 Hz for Guide Tube 3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Element
[ ] Beam
[ ] Closed Form Solution 4.
[ 73 Coquter Codes:
SAP 4606 Frequency Range anc ho. of sedes considered:
to 100 Hz 9 modes for Guide Tube
[ 3 Hand Calculations 5.
Method of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[X3 Abselute Sum [X3 SRSS
[ ] Other:
6.
Daqing: OBE
.02 SSE
.02 Basis for the daqing used:
7.
Support Considerations in the sodel:, _, _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _
8.
Critical Structural Ele ents:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
.I.d.e.nt..i f..i c.a t..i.o.n. L.o.c.a.t.i o.n.. Comb.i.n.a.t.i.o.n.....S.t.re.s.s....St.re..s.s.. A..l.l Maxinum Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility (a) The dynamic model is 1-D.
Max horizontal ARS are multiplied by l
1.4 to account for both directions.
12/B0 E
e.
P,PL
- B21-F022/2?
I.
\\
Qualification Su, ary o' Equip.e.t I.
Plant Name:
Fermi 2 Ty p e..
r 1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison PW.
2.
N555:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison gm 4-Fark I II.
Compt ent nan __ Ma in St aa-f (nl a t inn inSna rd t nn+ hna re v,1 rne 1.
Scope:
[x) N555
[ ] BOP B21-F022 -
2.
Model Nu.ber:
DWG 21150-H (VPF *2954-1-5)
Quantity:
P21-Fo?: -4 3.
Vendor:
Atwood & Morrill. Salen. Mass.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and rodel No. of the devices included:
N/A 5,.
Physical Description a.
Appearance b.
Dimensions 26", Body Lenath:
63"
.12" c.
Weight Flooded:
10,6?0 lbs.. Dry:
9.520 lbs.
B21-F022: Drywell 6.
Location:
Building:
psi rnse-nottiMn sto3-To-noi Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ 3 Bolt (No.
. Size
)
x Weld (Length
) Butt Weld on 26" Pipe 8.
.a. Systet. in which located:
Nuclear Boiler Syste-b.
Functional
Description:
Open/Close Service-c.
Is the equipment required for [] Hot Standby [x] Cold Shutdoc
[] Both
[] Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
21A9257, Rev. 4, 732E150, Part-XC 12/80
MPL # B21.F022/28 l
~
2 l
l III. Is Equipnent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ $ Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualifkation Method:
[ ] Test
[x 3 Analysis
[ ] Coeination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *:
Valve Design Calculations (No., Title and Date)
VPF #2964-8-3 CorTany that Prepared Report: Atwood & Morrill Corpany that Reviewed Report: General Electric V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [X] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Fydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Cortination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Cosining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X]
t1/A 76Y.hiM ipiliTJ)-
3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 4.
Daming Corresponding to RRS: OBE N/A SSE N/A 5.
Required Accelerotion in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other(ipiliTy-)~~
OBE S/s =
F/B =
_ V ". 1 07" S/S *...... 0. 3 2..
_ F/B =. _ _ _Q Z 2 _-
V =_ o,14;_
,, _15.2. _
1,5 n _
6.
Were fatigJe effects or other vibration loads considered?
[X3 Yes
[ ] No If yes, describe loads considered and how i. hey were treated in overall qualification program:
Valve fatigue requirements of ASME code for pumps and valves (1968) Para 452.5 and cy_clic loadino conditions of Para 454 were satisfied.
- NOTE: If more than one report coglete itens IV thru VII for each report.
12/e0
/
MPL # B21-F022/28 _,,,
,3, N/A VI.
If Qualification by Test, then Comp ~lete*:
[ ] randoe
~~~
1.
[ ] Single Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequeng: i sine beat
~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
2.
[ ] Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis
~
3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE...
Other gg 4.
Frequeng Range:
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (SUde/ Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
5.
V=__
5/5 =
F/B =
6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS er.veloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RR5 graphs'
[ ] No 8.
Input g-level Test: OBE 5/5 =
F/B =
V=
SSE S/S =
F/B =
V=
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
- Size,
_ ) [ ] Weld (Length
) []
1.
[ ] Bolt (No.
- 10. Functional operability verified: E 3 Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
-_-====_
If qualification by a cont >ination of test and analysis also conplete
- Not e:
Item VII.
f 12/80
/
e
- ~ ~ - - - _ - _ _ _.
- -s*.
-- m oa se.
g
,=
MPL # B21-F022/28
,4, NOTE:
Valve was modeled in the V11. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
main steam piping. Dynamic 1.
Method of Analysis:
agalysis of the main stea-piping was performed.
[x] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis for Valve Only)
[x](Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[ ] Response Sp'ectrum Natural Frequencies.'n) Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
(for Piping System 2.
S/S =
13.3 Hz I/B "..13 3..Hz V"
13.3 Hz i
3.
Model Type: [ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[(110 i
[ ] Finite Elerent
[ ] Beam
[X3 Closed Fore Solution 4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:
SAP IV with PISYS Post Processor Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:,_____,______
[X] Hand Calculations were performed for valve analysis 5.
Method of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Abs:1ute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X3 Other:
N/A zg ;377j).............
6.
Daqing: OBE,_ _ _ SSE, _ _ Basis for the daqing used:___
7.
Support Considerations in the model: (1) Nozzle Weld Ends (2) Bonnet-Body 8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Bonnet-Body Level D 21,773 PSI 26,700 PSI Flange Maximum Allowable Deflection l
B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility Stem at Top 0.114" Sprir.g Plate e
o e
G 12/83 s
gualification Su-rary of Equip-ent I.
Plant Name:
Ferri 2 yppe.
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison P W?.
2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison ggo.4 Part I II.
Co ?onent Na e Rela y 1.
Scope:
[x] NSSS
[ ] BOP 2.
Model Nu-ber:
HGA (Ell-K001 A)
Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
_ carinet or panel, name and model No. of the 4.
If the co.ponent ie a
devices included:
't.
Physical Description a.
Appearance Box shape b.
Dimensions 4" x 4b" x 2h" c.
Weight l
6.
Location: Building:
Reactor Elevation:
61 3' 6" 7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
~
Weld (Length
)
lX Panel Hil-P617 l
8.
a.
System in which located:
RHR b.
Functional
Description:
Energizes to initiate ECCS actions c.
Is the equipment required for [] Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdown
[y] Both
[] Neither
.9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
GE PPD 136B3136P001 12/B0 f
l'.
2 III. is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X3 y,3
[] go IV. Equipment 0;alifkation Method:
. [X3 Test
[ ] Analysis
[ 3 Cortination cf Test l
l and Analyst s Qualification Report *: Sd5dc las!.fm]E.221!f.?fL34%/70 (No., Title and Date)
Seismic Test Results, 234A9802, R2, 4/3/73 l
CoTany that Prepared Report GE Comany that Reviewed Report:
GE V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loade conside red:
- a. [x] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrocynamic only
- c. [ ] Corbination of (a) aad (b) 2.
Method of Contining RRf [ 3 Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X3 N/A
~15tliiWipicWy)-
3.
Required Response Spectra (attaen the graphs):JA DaT ng Corresponding to RR5: OBE
_ _ NLA SSE N/A i
4.
5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other (ifeUT~)
y V=
0.07a OBE S/S =
0.75g F/B =
0.753~ ~~ ~
SSE S/S =' " 'J Tg ~ ~-
F/B = ] }9
~V=
o_.j aa 6.
Were fatig;e effects or other vibration loads considered?
[]Yes
[x3 No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
- NOTE: If more than one report corplete iters IV thru V;. for each report.
. 12/80
~~-
-Q-,
m
--~n-a
~,ee
.--e-
+n,-
.----w wrr
.g.
-~
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
random 1.
[)3 S',ngle Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
[
sine beat
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
2.
[ y) Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis Resonance 3.
No. of Qualification Tests:
OBE SSE Other Endurance Frequency Range:
4.
l-33 bz 5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /BacL, Vertical):
S/S =
Nore F/B.
32hz y.
None 6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[X] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS & RR5 graphs',
[ ] No N/A 8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =
F/B =
V=
SSE S/5 =
13.0g F/B =
1.5g V = _. 2.3c 9.
Laboratory Mounting:
Panel
) [73 Mounting
- Size,
) [ ] Weld (Length-Simuletion l.
[ ] Bolt (No.
- 10. Functional operability verified: [X] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
Relay (deeneraized normalij closed contacts) will not ; hatter (10 msec) up to 1.5g.
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test, including r2sults):
Relay (normally opened contacts) will functiggerly up to 7.5q.
.. - --_ =
If qualification by a conbination of test and ardlysis also cot ete l
- Note:
Itsm VII.
~
\\
6
/
12/80 l
i
-- - -~,
-y--
-e,em
---r
,-,--,----,,------,-,,.---.---m-,-a as-e,.
,,w n,
e v
-ww-o.-,
ne
---m--,,,-.-m
,,,e-n.,.
4 VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analy> r
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis.
[ ] Time-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Fra eies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element
[ ] Bea
[ ] Closed Form Solution 4.
[ ] Coguter Codes:_ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _
Frequency Range and No. of sodes considered: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _
[ ] Hand Calculations 5.
Method of Combining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absciute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Cther:
- ; 77j).............
6.
Darping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7.
Support Considerations in the podel:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility O
12/B0 f
_.._,._.m.
..,__.___....-._._,__-_._,..._---..-,,.,,,_..----,____r_,.
l
.J Qualification Su'rary of Ecuir ent 1.
Plant Name:
Ferni 2 Type-1.
Utility:
Cetroit Edison PG 2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison BW 4. a-1 I p
II. Componer. New D/P Transmitter 1.
Scope:
[X] E555
[ ] B3r 2.
Model Nenber:
sc; f r,u. *: ~ 1 1,
Quantity:
1 (for this ".PL f.o.)
GE 4.
If the co ponent is a cabinet or panel, nane an:' model ho. of the devices included:
I
'5.
Physical Descr;ation a.
Appearance Box share b.
Dimensions 9.7" x 5.5" x 5.5" c.
Weight 23 lbs.
6.
Lotation: Building:
L Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
Weld (Length
)
~
,X Local Panel H21 P002 8.
a.
System in which located:
RCWil b.
Functional
Description:
f!easure return flow to RPV c.
Is the equip-ent required for [] Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdoc.
[] Both
['] Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
GE PPD 145C3007 12/83
-2 I
III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [x3 Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Oaa11f kation Method:
. [ y) Test
[ ] Analysis
[ ] Cort >ination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: Seismic Test Results. 225A6259, 5/30/70 (No., Title and Date)
Corrany that Prepared Report:
GE Co pany that Reviewed Report:,_G,E,__,__,______
Y.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [ y) Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ 3 Co:tination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Cortining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ y) N/A,_,,,,_,T D _
75%er, spec 1 3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 4.
Daming Corresponding to RRS: OBE N/A SSE N/A 5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other (IVec31*y)
OBE S/S =
0.7 5a F/B =
0.75 Y=
0.07a SSE S/S =""Un*~~
F/B =-].T{1 ----
V=;
o.14 q 6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
l 1
[ ] Yes
[y] No If yes, describe load; considered end how they were treated in overall j
qualification program:
- NDTE: If more than one report coglete items IV thrv VII for each report.
l l
12/80 l
l
. ~.
3 VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
Irandom 1.
[X] Single Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
[( sine beat 2.
[X] Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis Resonance 3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE..
Other Endurance g g g --- - -
4.
Frequency P.ange:
_5_3_3 pg__
5.
Natural Fraquencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =,,,,p o F/B =
y,,,
V=_
ny, 6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[x] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RR5 graphs)
[ ] No 8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =
1.5o F/E =
1,50 Y=
0 s-SSE S/S =_
F/B = _ _
V=
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
Panel 1.
[ ] Bolt (No.
Size
) [ ] Weld (Length
) [X3 t'ounting
~
Simulation l
- 10. Functional operability verified: [X]Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
~~
- 11. Test Results including rodifications made:
Transmitter performed norr ally up to 12g
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
j Qagility li_mit established atJg w1;th no malfunction i
Mt_ set by shakegbgcapabilityL,__
If qualification by a cor:bination of test and ardlysis also co@lete
- Note:
Item VII.
12/80 '
i e
---,,..7.-__,_--%,-_.,,.
,4.
c
,, -,, - - - - - - - -. -. -,,,. - - - - + - - -,. - -
VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Tire-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[]2D
[ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Ele ent
[ ] Beam
[ ] Closed Fore Solution 4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:,,, _,, _ _ _,, _, _,, _,, _,
[ ] Hand Calculations l
5.
Method of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other: g ; 77j).............-_...
6.
Darping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:,,,,,,,,,,_
1 l
7.
Support Considerations in the model:
1 8.
Critical Structural Elements:
l l
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification location Combination Stress Stress Allowable MaxinJm Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assurt Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility 4
0 6
12/80 m
4.s
.. i i
1.
MPL
- B31-F031 Qualificatter Su, ary o' Equip e-t I.
Plant Na e:
Fermi 2 Type-1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison PWR 2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison ggp 4 v3r> I II. Componert Name Recirculation Syster Discheree valve 1.
5: ope:
[x]NSSS
[ ] B3P 2.
Model Nu.ber:
0-12,461 (VPF #2803-99-3)
Quantity:
2 3.
Vendor:
Lur' enheimer. Cincinnati Ohio 4.
If the co ;;*ent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included:
N/A s5..
Physical Description a.
Appearance Motor Operated Gate Valve Overall Lenath: 65.00 b.
Dimensions 28" x 24" x 28", Overall Heiiht (From Pipe d ): 115.50" Extended c.
Weight Dry:
8844 lbs. Flooded: 10?75 lbs.
Structure Wt 1??5.3 lbs.
6.
Location:
Building:
Primary Containment Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
- X Weld (Length
) Buti!E' eld on 28" Pipe 9
8.
a.
System. in which located: Reactor Water Recirculation Systa-b.
Functional
Description:
Open/Close Service c.
Is the equipment required for [] Hot Standby [() Cold Shutdown
[] Both
[] Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
21A1477. Rev. 5, 9200793, Part-9 12/83 w
~
MPL 0 B31-F0?1
\\*
-2 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [K ] Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualifkation Method:
- [ ] Test
[< ] Analysis
[ ] Contination of Test and Analysis
, Qualification Report *:
GE 386HA605. Rev. 0 (No., Title and Date) Recirculation Discharoe Black Valve Model Co@any that Prepared Report:
General Electric Co@any that Reviewed Report:,,,,G,e,n,e,r,a,1,,E,1,e c,t,r,i c, _ _ _ __
V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [X] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydroc[ynamic only
- c. [ ] Co-tination of (a) and (t) 2.
Method of Corbining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X]
N/A 75UiiM~ifeciTy)~
3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 4.
Da@ing Corresponding to F35: OBE N/A SSE N/A 5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other(ibiciTy^] ~
OBE S/S =
F/B =
V=
y =-
n u S/S =_ _ 1 g p/B =__1 s;9 9
- S5t 6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
[X]Yes
[ ] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
Valve fatiaue reauirements of ASME Sgt.i.e.n LII Paragraph NB3545.3 and cycle loading conditions of Paragraph NB-3550 were satisfied.
- NOTE: If more than one report coglete items IV thnt VII for each report.
1
. 12/80
- Required acceleration per piping stress report No. 22A2651 AB, Rev.2.
\\
e
-.,ym,,
MPL F B31-F031 3
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Comp ~lete*:
N/A
[ ] random
~~~~~
1.
[ ] Single Frequency
[ 3 Multi-Frequency:
sine beat
~~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~
2.
[ ] Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis 3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE...
Other 4.
Frequency Range:
5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No 8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =
F/B =
V=
j F /B =,
V=
SSE S/S =
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
) [ ] Weld (Length _
) []
l.
[ ] Bolt (No.
Size ___
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ 3 Not Applicable
~'
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
l
- 12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test including results):
1 l
- Not e:
If qualification by a combination of test and analysis also conplete l
Item VII.
12/B0,'
1
.n_.--
I MPL # B31-F031 VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete: *(NOTE: The discharge valve was modeled in the piping analysis. Dynari:
1.
Method of Analysis:
analysis was performed on the piping system).
0(3 Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis For Valve Only
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
47 Hz F/E =
47 HZ V=
47 HZ 3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[X]10
[ ] Finite Elecent
[ ] Beam
[X] Closed Form Solution 4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:
SAP IV with PISYS Post Processor Frequency Range and No. of redes considered:
[ $ Hand Calculations 5.
Method of Combining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absciute Sum [X] 5P.55
[ ] Other:
6.
Datping: OBE,,,,,,,,, SSE_,,,,,
Basis for the damping used:
f/A,_
j 7.
Support Considerations in the model:
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seisnde Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Flange Level-D 28,364 PSI 29,400 PSI Maximum Allowable Deflection B.
Mar. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility 9
e 12/B0 I
. ~ _.
l
- j..-
I MPL:
B11-U002 s.
gualification Su racy of Ecuir e.
I.
Plant Na,c:
Fermi 2 Type:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison P @.
2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison gr. 4-Pa-n I II. Co poner.: Na e Re?ctor Vessel Stabilizer 1.
Scope:
[X)NSS5
[ ] BJP 2.
Model Nu-ber:
762E926 PI Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
GE 4.
If the co.;onent is a cabinet or panel name and m:::cl hc. of the devices in:1uded:
N/A b Physical Description a.
Appearance 8 Steel bumpers b.
Dimensions 7 ft. x 15" x 13" each c.
Weight Approx. 2.000 lbs. each 6.
Location: Building: Containment Elevation: +565" 7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
X Weld (Length 87" )
1 8.
a.
Systet, in which lo:sted:
Reactor Assembly b.
Functional
Description:
Set of bunoers - restrains vessel horizontally c.
Is the equipment required for [ 3 Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdown i
[X3 Both
[] Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
762E926 r
12/80 l
l
MPL Bil-UOO2
' ~
.?
2 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspectic", in the Plant: [X3 Yes
[ 3 No IV. Equipment 0;alif kation Method:
. [ ] Test
[)0 Analysis
[ ] Co-tination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report :
DRF (No., Title and Date)
B13-107 Co:Tany that Prepared Report:
GE Cogany that Reviewed Report:_G,E, _ _ _, _ _ _, _ _, _ _
V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [)0 Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Cortination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Cor: tining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ /J tyA l
75UiiWijiciff)"
3.
Required Respor.se Spectra (attach the graphs):
N/A 4.
Daging Corresponding to RRS: OBE N/A SSE N/A 5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZP A
[ ] Other (ipiliT})
OBE S/S =
0.759 F/B =
0.759 Y=
0.75g SSE S /S =_"."".T.T.g'~ ~
- F/B -~T.T.g-~~
" V =~CTTg
=--
6.
Were fatig>e effects or other v'ibration loads considered?
[]Yes
[X3No If yes, describe loads considered and hw they were treated in overall qualification program:
1
=.
6 l
- NOTE: If sore than one report corplete items IV tiiru VII for each report.
12/80
-r
--,-v
---,-n
3 MPL Bll-0002 i
VI.
.I.f O.a a.l.i fi.c.a.t.i.o.n..by Te.s.t.,.t.he.n Co..pl.e.t.e.*.:
N/A dx 1.
[ 3 Single Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
sine beat 2.
[ ] Single Axts
[ ] Multi-Axis 3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE.
Other
-.~.
4.
Frequency Range:
5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, reont/Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
6.
Method of Detert::ining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test
[ ] In-situ Test
[ ] Analysis 1
l l
7.
TRS enveloping RRS using Multi. Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RR5 graphs) i
[ ] No l
8.
Input g-level Test:
OBE 5/5 -
F/B =
V=
l SSE 5/5 =_
F/B =
V=
=
l 9.
Laboratory Mounting:
1.
[ 3 Bolt (No.
Size
) [ ] Weld (Length
) []
10.
Functional operability verified:
[ ] Yes [ 3 No
[ 3 Not Applicable
~
II. Test Results including snodifications made:
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
= = _. -
==
. = - _
' Note:
If qualification by a conbination of test and at lysis also co @lete Item VII.
12/80,'
e e
MPL B11-U002 4
s.
VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then co ;1ete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
D:] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Tire-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
BY INSPECTION S/S =
> 33 bz F/B *
>. 33 bz V=
> 33 hr 3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[]2D
[]10 N/A
[ ] Finite Element
[ ] Bear
[ ] Closed Fore Solutio:.
4.
[ ] Co:puter Codes:
N/A Frequency Range and ho. of modes considered:
N/A
[X]HandCalculations 5.
Method of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Abselute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X] Other:
N/A g ; z9y).............___..
6.
Darping: OBE__N[A,_ SSE__,N/A Basis for the darping used:_ _ _ _
7.
Support-Considerations in the model: Pinned to take horizontal loads only B.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seisnic Total St ress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Rod Surface Preload plus N/A 82,000 90,000 psi emergency psi Maximum Allevable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility N/A N/A N/A 4
/
12/B0 2
I
..g Qualification Su reey of Equip-ent 1.
Plant Name:
Fermi 2 Type:
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison PG 2.
N555:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison Br.4-Part I 11.
Cor.ponent Na e Local Rack - 72" 1.
Scope:
[X) N555
[ ] B0P 2.
Model Number:
H21-P025 Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
GE 4.
If the co.ponent is a cabinet or panel, name and rnodel No. of the devices included:
8 D/P Trans-itters. cr op0 163C1561 P772203
,./
M Physical Description a.
Appearance nnen 93-t b.
Dimensions 72" x 79" v 24" c.
Weight 6.
Location: Building:
l Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [X) Bolt (No.
. Size
)
Weld (Length
)
l NBS 8.
a.
System in which located:
D/P Trdnsmittcrs raeasure si.c flow i
b.
Functional De,scription:
l c.
Is the equipxnt required for [] Hot Standby [] Cold Shutd r.
1
[] Both
[X) Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
GE Orawing 145C3403TG 1?/83
~
l l
[
2 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: E 3 Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualifkation Method:
. [x] Test
[ ] Analysis
[ ] Codination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: Seismic Test Results, 225Ab555 R1,1/30/73 (No., Title and Date)
CorTany that Prepared Report:
CE Co pany that Reviewed Report:, _ G,E _ _,, _ _ _ _ _
V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [X) Seismic or.ly
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Cortination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Cortining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[X] *N/A 3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
ft/A 4.
Daging Corresponding to RRS: OBE fl/A SSE N/A i
5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other (ipiec1Ty-)
OBE S/S =
0.7 5g F/B =
0.7 5a V=
0.07c SSE S/S =' ~ T 53 ' ~ ~~
F/B =~ ~T 3g
~ V =-~FT4T 9
6.
Were fatig;e effects cr other vibration loads considered?
[ ] Yes
[X3 No I
l If yes, describe loads consiered and hw they were treated in overall l
qualification program:
.. _... ~...
- NOTE: If n,re than one report co@lete items IV thrv VII for each report.
12/80 1
,.--___,,,--7
__,m_
g
..7-
a VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
Irandom 1.
[X3 Single Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
( sine beat J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.
[X3 Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis 3.
E.). of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other Resonance 4.
Frequency Range:
5-33 bz 5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
V =__ None S/S = 20.1 hz, 23.3 hz. F/B =
No_ne 6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[X3 Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RR5 using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RR5 graphs)
[ ] h:
N/A Y=
8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =,,,_
F /B =,,,_
SSE S/S =
0.5g F/B =
none V=
none 9.
Laboratory Mounting:
& clamps Size _
) [ ] Weld (Length
) []
1.
[X3Bolgg(No.__ _
- 10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes
[ ] No
[x] Not Applicable I
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: Resonance identified at 20.1 hz and 23.3 hz with maximum amplification of ~3.
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test, including resuits):
-=_
-.=
1
' Note:
If qualification by a combination of test and analysis also complete Item VII.
0 12/80 e
-m
.'s 4
B VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time. History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[]10
[ ] Finite Eler.ent
[ ] Beam
[ ] Closed Form Solutf on 4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:, _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _____________
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: _____,__,____
[ ] Hand Calculations 5.
fvthod of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other:
- g 377).............
6.
Darping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7.
Support Considerations in the podel:, _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,, _ _ _
8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total St ress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B.
Max Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility 4
0 e
12/B0 8
- * ~
r pualification Su-rary of Equip ent I.
Plant Name:
Ferr.1 2 yype.
1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison PWE 2.
Nsss:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison B we. a. a d I v
II. Corponent Na e Temperature Control 1.
Scepe:
[ 0 Nsss
[ ] Ba?
2.
Model Nu-ber:
15807072(C41 -N006 )
Quantity:
1 3.
Vendor:
woed i n.
ru-nnt 4.
If the co ;onent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included:
Appearance
,-a ry. gular Box Rectan
,). Physical Description a.
14rs,4,,3
.+,
Dirensions_(7b" x 1" OD - tube) h"x7"x3t" -Envl b.
c.
Weight 6.
Location: Building:
Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
Size
)
- } Weld (Length
)
F lU t ocal Panal H?1 poll B.
a.
System in which located:
si c b.
Functional
Description:
Measure tadnarature of fluid i, c, e
..t c.
Is the equipcent required for [] Hot Standhy [] Cold Shutdown
[] Both
[ () Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
GE PPD 15887072 12/80
g r.
III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X3 Yes
[ 3 No IV. Equipment 0;a11fkation Method:
. [ ] Test
[X3 Analysis
[ ] Cortination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *:
DRF A00-1043-15,12/23/80 (No., Title and Date)
Cogany that Prepared Report:
GE Co pany that Reviewed Report:
GE V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [ ] Seisde only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynade only
- c. [ ] Codination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Corbining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[]
rya 75Uier;'sp eciYy)~
3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):jg_______
4.
Daqing Corresponding to RRS: OBE,,,,jyj SSE
_ yA __
I 5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZP A
[ ] Other I
(spe:ityT-OBE S/S =
- 0. 7 5a F/B =
0.7 5g V=
0.079 SSE S/S =-"J.{'-"
F/B =~~~T.yf"-~~ -
~~ V =~
U. leg 6.
Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
[ ] Yes
[y] No If yes, describe 1ctds considered and hw they were treated in overall qualification program:
I l
- NOTE: If more than one report coglete items IV thru VII for each report.
12/80
,-w--,.
=--,i.,-,,.--e-1,
.,-v=
, = _. -
~
3 t
VI.
If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
,3 random 1.
[ ] Single Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
sine beat
~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~
2.
[ ] Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis 3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE_
__SSE,,,,,
Other 4.
Frequency Range:
5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S =
F/B =
V=
6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[ ] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ].'nalysis 7.
TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] Nc F /B =
V=
8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =,,
SSE S/S =
F/B =
V=
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
Size,_
)
[ ] Weld (Length
) []
1.
[ ] Bolt (No.
- 10. Functional operability verified:
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made:
- 12. Other test perforced (such as aging or fragility test. including results):
- Not e:
If qualification by a combination of test and analysis also corplete Item VII.
12/ 80 /
/
e e_-
a r t VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[X] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
V=
none S/S =
567 hz F/B
- none 3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[]10
[ ] Finite Elerent
[x] Beam
[ ] Closed Form Solution 4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:________________,______
Frequency Range and No. of sodes considered:_ _, _ _ _, _ _, _ _ _ _
[X] Hand Calculations 5.
Method of Cortining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Other:
N/A
- ;777j).............
6.
Damping: OBE N/A SSE Basis for the darping used:
7.
Support Considerations in the model:,, _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,___,___
8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility o
12/80 p----
--w
-m,r
--w
,,,-m-g m- - - - - - - -
~ - -, - - -,,
-,e,--
~ - - - - - -
"lt
[..
'I MPL # Cll-0001 Qualification Sunrary c' Equip ent I.
Plant Name:
Ferr.i 2 Type-PWR 1.
Utility:
Detroit Edison 2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison BWE 4-Mark I II.
Component Na e Hydraulic Control Unit 1.
Scope:
[)0 NSSS
[ ] B3P 2.
Model Nunber:
DRWG 761E500G Quantity:
185 3.
Vendor:
General Electric Co.
4.
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. cf the devices included:
N/A Assembly of Valves, Pipes, Tanks,
'8.
Physical Description a.
Appearance riping ano tiectric controis b.
Dimensions Width 22"; Height 102"; Death 20" c.
Weight 785 lbs.
6.
Location:
Building:
Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions B 3 Bolt (No. 4
, Size 1/2 )
Weld (Length
)
8.
a.
System i'n which located:
Control Rod Drive Hydraulic Systen b.
Functional
Description:
To insert and withdratt fuel control rods c.
Is the equipment required for [] Hot Standby [x] Cold Shutdown
[ 3 Both
[] Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 21A8799 12/80 e
G
O MPL 0 Cll-D001 2
t III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: B] Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualifkation Method:
. [ ] Test
[ ] Analysis
[XJ Coritination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *:
384HA183 (No. Title and Date)
Hydraulic Control Unit Test Report (7/16/75)
CorTany that Prepared Report: Wyle Lab / General Electric Co pany that Reviewed Report: General Ele,c,tri,c_,,_ _ _, _
V.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [x] Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Corbination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Cortining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[x]
N/A 75?FeWipeUUT-3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
yA Dart ng Corresponding to RRS: OBE F/A SSE Nf;, _ _
i 4.
5.
Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
[X]ZPA
[ ] Other(ipiclTy]-
OBE S/S =
0.753~~
F/B =
0.75a V=
0.07a V =~~ ~ ~ Tir F/B =~
T g ~ ~ _
'5/S ='""T'59 6.
Were f atispe effects or other vibration loads considered?
)
i
[ ] Yes
[X] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:
l l
- NOTE: If more than one report cor:plete items IV thru VII for each report.
. 12/80 y
,,-m
____,__w r...-,,__r__,_
MPL 0 C11-D001 e ---
VI.
If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
.X] random 1.
[ ] Single frequency
[X3 Multi-Frequency:
- X sine beat 2.
[x3 Single Axis
[ ] Multi. Axis
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~
3.
No. of Qualification Tests: OBE 1
SSE... 2 Other y
4.
Frequency Range: _ _ __ _ l-33 Hz _ (Horizontal) 1-100 Hz (Vertical) 5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S = 2.75, 5.0, 8.5 & 14 F/B =2, 4.2,7.75 & 12.5V = 10, 38, 41 49.5 Hz g
6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[X) Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] ies (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No N/A 8.
Input g-level Test:
OBE S/S =
F/B =
V=
SSE S/S =
16 g F/B =_
15 g V=
18 9 9.
Laboratory Mounting:
1.
[X] Bolt (No.
4, Size,l/2" ) [ ] Weld (Length
) [3 10.
Functional operability verified:
[X) Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including modifications made: Test completed without significd:it damage to HCU that would result in a failure to " scram".
- 12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
Fragility test
..==_
-=- - - _ _ _
- -__=,__ _--
- Nott:
If qualification by a cortinatior, of test and analysis also conplete Item VII.
12/80
_,n,
,--4
a y
MPL 0 C11-D001
.r-0 VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then co plete:
- 1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[X] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[)0 Response Spectrum 2.
Naturs1 Frequencies in Each Dimetion (Side / Side, Front /3ack, Vertical):
S/S = 2. 75, 4. 5, 8. 5.t..14 F/B = 2, 4, 7.75 & 12.5 V=
10, 38, 41, 49.5 Hz Hz
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Tiz 3.
Model Type:
[X]3D
[ ] 2D
[]10
[ X] Finite Element
[< ] Beair
[ ] Closed Form Solution 4.
[X] Coquter Codes:
SAMIS Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 10 1
[ ] Hand Calculations t
5.
Method of Cortining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absch:te Sum [ ] SRSS N/A l
[ ] Other:
6.
Daqing: OBE SSE Basis for the da g ing used:
7.
Support Considerations in the sodel:
Floor Mounted 8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Lc?d or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable N/A Maxirum Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assum Functional Opera-1 Deflection Location bility i
N/A 1
i
- The purpose of the analysis is to determine the natural frequencies and the HCU capability. A typical spectra was used.
No exact stresses were calculated. Since the HCU was tested, the analysis is.-
used as a reference.
12/B0 8
e
i,.
Qualification Sunrary of Equip-ent
- Plant Name:
Fermi 2 1.
Utility:
Petroit Edison PWP.
2.
NSSS:
GE 3.
A/E: Detroit Edison BWo. 4-Pa"k I II.
Co ponent Na-e D/P Transmitter l
1.
Scope:
[X)NSSS
[ ] B??
2.
Model Number: 3E8 (B31-N014 A)
Quantity:
1 (for this l'PL fio.)
3.
Vendor:
Barton 4.
If the conponent is a cabinet or panel, nane and model No. of the devices included:
5.'
Physical Description a.
Appearance nnrsi c. en, starn 81 " x 6" x 9" b.
Dimensions 3
c.
Weight 9 lbs.
6.
Location:
Building:
Elevation:
7.
Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No.
. Size
)
Weld (LengthLocal Panel M{C6 L
'X C.
a.
System in which loccted:
Recirc ieasure recirculation flow b.
Functional
Description:
c.
Is the equipment required for [] Hot Standby [] Cold Shutdown
[] Both
[ X) Neither 9.
Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
GE PPD 145C 3026 (similar to ll7C3387) 12/80 4
.Q
4 4
2 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [x] Yes
[] No IV. Equipment Qualifkation Method:
. [x 3 Test
[ ] Analysis
[ ] Cort >ination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: __D tt Sheg L Qqogt - Vibration A
(No., Title and Date) _W_1),q,L3,qE-ja__
Corrany that Prepared Report:,, y,y,1A aboratorias L
Corpany that Reviewed Report:,_qE_ _ _, _ _ _, _ _, _
Y.
Vibration Input:
1.
Loads considered:
- a. [ y3 Seismic only
- b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
- c. [ ] Cotination of (a) and (b) 2.
Method of Codining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ))
N/A 75Y.hiWipiiTTy-]-
3.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): N/A 4.
Darping Corresponding to RRS: OBE n/A SSE N/A 5.
Required Acceleratien in Eech Direction:
[ ] ZPA
[ ] Other (spilliy]--
- 0. 7 5 _,,,,_, F /B =,J25,g,,,________ V "
M7c OBE S/S =
3 V"
0.14 e 1 5_a F/B =
15s2 SSE S/S =
2 6.
Were fatigJe effects or other vibration leads considered
[ ] Yes
[y3No If yes, describe loads considered and how t"tey were treated in overall qualification program:.................. -..... - - -.. - -
........ ~.
- NOTE: If more than one report corplete items IV thru VII for each report.
1 2/80 O
,---w a
wm,
e-----
~
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete *:
3 random I
l 1.
[X3 Singit Frequency
[ ] Multi-Frequency:
X sine beat
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~
2.
[X3 Single Axis
[ ] Multi-Axis Resonance Other e g,Njl ~ ~
3.
No. of Qualification Tests:
OBE_
SSE cc ispec
~~
1-50 hz l
4.
Frequency Range:
l 5.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
F/B =__ _ none y.
none S/S =
none 6.
Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
[X] Lab Test
[ ] In-Situ Test
[ ] Analysis 7.
TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs',
[]NC N/A l
8.
Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = _
F /B =_
Y =_
l SSE S/S =
- 1. 5g _
F/B =
1.5g V=_
1.5c l
9.
Laboratory Mounting:
l Pa nel 1.
[ 3 Bolt (No.
Size _
)
[ ] Weld (Length
) [X3 Mounting simulation l--
10.
Functional operability verified: [X3Yes [ ] No
[ ] Not Applicable
- 11. Test Results including m.difications made: No damaae or malfunctions were observed.
- 12. Other test perforned (such t.s aging or fragility test, including results):
Fragility limit established at 6.59 in both horizontal axes, and 3.09 vertical l
axis.
1 If qualification by a conbination of test and analysis also co@lete
- Note:
Item VII.
8 12/80 O
y r-
-v' e-
-r--
--w-
-w--
4 VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete:
1.
Method of Analysis:
[ ] Static Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysis
[ ] Dynamic Analysis:
[ ] Time-History
[ ] Response Spectrum 2.
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
S/S -
F/B -
v-3.
Model Type:
[ ] 3D
[ ] 2D
[ ] 10
[ ] Finite Elerent
[ ] Beam
[ ] Closed Fore Solutf or.
4.
[ ] Corputer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:_ _ _ _ _ ___.. _.....
[ ] Hand Calculations 5.
Method of Corbining Dynamic Responses:
[ ] Absciute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other:
g ;377j).............
(
6.
Darping: OBE,,,,,,,,, SSE,,,,,,
Basis f or the darping uset,,,,,,,,,,_
7.
Support Considerations in the sodel:,_,_,____________
8.
Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A.
Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B.
Max. Critical to Assure Functional Opera-Deflection Location bility O
e D
12/80
,_...m
,,_m-
.1
_-w-----
y.
_