ML20009A925

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-206/81-18 on 810504-29.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20009A925
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/24/1981
From: Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Papay L
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20009A926 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107140499
Download: ML20009A925 (2)


See also: IR 05000206/1981018

Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ -

FOR DCS PROCESSING A

-

+

Original document not available

/"maak

to NRC

UNITED STATES

Certifiedbyh.Bf///7246th,

F'

[E

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-

REGION V

//'

0

Y

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

SulTE 202. WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

epge

WALNUT CR EEK, CALIFORNIA 94596

June 24, 1981

Docket No. 50-206

9

N

Southern California Edison Company

?.

I

P.O. Box 800

$

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue

M L 1 3JSB N

__

7

Rosemead, California 91770

8% Neue

Advanced Engineering

M

, hs)

Attention: Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President

%A

Ji::p \\ %#

Gentlemen:

Subject: NRC Inspection - San Onofre Unit 1

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mssrs. L. Miller and H. Canter of this

office on May 4 - 29, 1981 of activities authorized by NRC license No. DPR-13, and

to the discussions of his findings held by Mr. Miller with Mr. Curran and other

representatives of the Southern California Edison Company at the conclusion of the

inspection.

Araas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these area.;, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of

procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations

by the inspector.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the scope

of this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this

letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public

Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be

exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a)

notify this office by telephone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter

of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days

from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold

such information.

If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less

than seven (7) days are available for your review, please notify this office

promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with section

2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by

the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be

withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which

it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This

section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations

SPI

0107140499 010624

/

PDR ADOCK 05000206

7l I

s

-

PDR

g

.

.

.

.

-

.

,

Southern California Edison Company

-2-

June 24, 1981

'

listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be

. incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we

do not hear from you in this regard within the specified per.iods noted above, the

report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

4

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

.

/ 7

p

J/ L.

eds, Chief

gbactorOperationsProjectsBranch

'

Enclosures:

l:

IE Inspection Report

No. 50-206/81-18

cc w/o enclosure 1:

Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering & Operations, SCE

Mr. J.-M. Curran, SCE

1

4

4

'1

.4

i

\\

. _ - . , - - -

. . . _ . ,

- . . . . _ . ,

, , , _ _ - . . . ,

,

,,_y.

_ , . . .

.