ML20009A913

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-361/81-11 on 810417-0515.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20009A913
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/1981
From: Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Papay L
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20009A914 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107140473
Download: ML20009A913 (2)


See also: IR 05000361/1981011

Text

FOR DCS PROCESSING ,

.

ducg

Original document not abailable

4

UNITED STATES

to NRC

(M[b ,

8

7

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Certified by.

'

$

e ,$

l

REGION V

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

/

SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

  • m*

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596

June 25, 1981

Docket No. 50-361

ed

& g'(

F

1

s

t

!.

.

,

1-

Southern California Edison Company

W

i-

6-i JUL 13198

,3

. 3 ,,,,, , ,,,,1 **

7

P. O. Box 800

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue

,, ?

Rosemead, California 91770

%

aw m

%.

[q

Attention:

Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President

Advanced Engineering

p) *g h 4'

Gentlemen:

Subject: NRC Inspection of San Onofre Unit No. 2

This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. H. Canter and R. Pate of

this office on April 17 to May 15,1981, of activities authorized by NRC

Construction Permit No. CPPR-97, and to the discussion of our findings held

by Mr. Pate with Mr. Nunn and other members of your staff at the conclusion

of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and

observations by the inspectors.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the

scope of this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's

Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you

believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is

necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within ten (10) days

from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for with-

holding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a

written application to this office to withhold such information.

If your

receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven (7) days

are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that

a new due date may be established. Consistent with section 2.790(b)(1),

any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the

owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to

(

s

8107140473 810625

PDR ADOCK 05000361

G-

PDR

$

_

.

.

.

..

,

,

Southern California Edison Company

-2-

June 25,-1981

be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the

basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from

public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address

with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The

information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as

possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you

in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will

be place in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

)E

i

s; Chief

actor Operations Projects Branch

Enclosure:

1.

IE Inspection Report

No. 50-361/81-11

!

cc w/o enclosure:

Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering & Operations

l

l

r

!

l

l

'

l