ML20006E168

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 891002-13.Violations Noted: on 891004,inspector Identified Dismantled Scaffolding Components Leaning Against Impulse Lines of safety-related Instruments in Storage Area 22
ML20006E168
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/1990
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20006E166 List:
References
50-354-89-80, NUDOCS 9002220217
Download: ML20006E168 (3)


Text

p 5

i' o

I APPENDIX A L

N0TICE OF VIOLATION Public Service Electric and Gas Company Docket No. 50-354 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 License No. NPF-57 4

As a result of the maintenance team inspection conducted on October 2 to October 13, 1989, and in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure fur NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following violation was identified:

Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.1, requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained for various plant activities, t

1.

-Station Procedure SA-AP.ZZ-023(Q), paragraph 5.8.1.2 requires the storage locations for dismantled-scaffold components to be designated areas ~where

-no safety related components is impacted.

Contrary to the above, on October 4,1989 the inspector identified in storage area 22, dismantled scaffolding components leaning against the impulse lines of safety related instruments.

2.

Administrative Procedure SA-AP.ZZ-032(Q), paragraph 5.8.1 requires a biannual review of all Q, F. and R type procedures.

Contrary to the above, on October 10, 1989, about 50% of approximately 300 l

_ mechanical maintenance procedures and about 50% of approximately 1600 I&C and electrical maintenance procedures were overdue for biannual review, L

Most of the affected procedure are Q type procedures.

3.

Administrative Procedure NA-AP.ZZ-0009(Q), " Work Control Process", paragraph 5.14, Equipment Malfunction Identification System (EMIS), specifies that an EMIS tag is to be attached to malfunctioning equipment in the plant to identify to others that the malfunction has been identified for corrective l-action to be taken.

Contrary to the above, during a plant walkdown inspection on l

October 10, 1989, an obviously damaged extraction steam valve Limitorque

[

valve motor was noted.

It was determined that a work order to repair L.

this motor had been written.

Huwever, no EMIS tag had been hung as specified by the procedure.

1 l

l 1

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LC HOPE CREEK MTI - 0003.0.0 1

02/06/90 9002220217 900207 ADOCK0500g5,4 DR

s j

.r to Appendix A' 2-c L

4.

Station Procedure SA-AP.ZZ-013(Q), " Control of Temporary Modifications",

describes the method of controlling the installation of temporary modifications.

Paragraph 5.2 specifies that a temporary modification request (TMR) be prepared prior to the installation of a temporary modification. The TMR is used to assure appropriate review and control L

of the temporary modifications.

Contrary to the above, during a walkdown inspection of the 54 foot elevation of the turbine building conducted on October 10, 1989, the inspectors identified a number of plugs (temporary modifications) installed in some of the building floor drains. No TMR had been prepared for these modifications.

5.

Aduinistrative procedure NA-AP.ZZ-009(Q), paragraph 5.4.8(g) requires that 7-a "cause-of failure" or "cause code" be entered on corrective maintenance work orders.

1 Contrary to the-above, on October 10, 1989, while reviewing fifteen I

completed and closed out corrective maintenance work orders, the inspectors identified that no "cause of failure" or cause code had been entered.on these work orders.

6.

Maintenance Department Directive Procedure IC-DD.ZZ-020(Q), paragraph 4.2 requires the system engineer for Rosemount transmitters to generate periodic status reports from transmitter test results.

l Contrary to the above, on or before October 10, 1989, the system engineer h

j -

did not generate the specified status reports.

'7.

Station Procedure SA-AP.ZZ-031 paragraph 5.1.3.2 requir'es any oil leakage to be cleaned up immediately after identification.

l Contrary to the above, on October 3, 1989, a lubrication oil leak from the "C" diesel generator crankcase was identified which had not 'been cleaned up. A tag was hanging at the diesel generator indicating that the oil I

leak was identified before. This oil was not cleaned up until several days after NRC's identification.

8.

Station Procedure SA-AP.ZZ-013(Q), " Control of Temporary Modifications",

paragraph 5.1.2, requires that modifications made in accordance with an approved procedure shall have administrative control transferred to this procedure if they must remain at the completion of the work activity, or if the work activity is stopped for more than two shif ts (16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />).

Contrary to the above, on October ~11, 1989, a temporary dif ferential pressure gage installed across the lube oil filter of the 'B' Standby Diesel Generator for troubleshooting which was completed on October 6, 1989, was still inplace. No temporary modification was issued for this gage.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation.

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LC HOPE CREEK MTI - 0004.0.0 01/31/90

.E i-Jo' Appendix A 3

s Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Electric and Gas Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the letter which transmitted this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:

(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and, (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.

1 l

i il.

1 lL l

l l

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LC HOPE CREEK MTI - 0007.0.0 l

01/31/90 1

l