Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirement That Combined Time for Any 3 Consecutive Surveillance Intervals Not to Exceed 3.25 Times Specified Surveillance IntervalML20005G945 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Vogtle |
---|
Issue date: |
01/15/1990 |
---|
From: |
GEORGIA POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20005G942 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9001230308 |
Download: ML20005G945 (6) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217G6571999-10-13013 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS to Permit Relaxation of Allowed Bypass Test Times & Completion Times for LCOs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 ML20217B1221999-10-0404 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 5.5.6 Incorporating Exceptions to Reg Guide 1.35,rev 2,as Described in FSAR Section 3.8.1.7.2 Re Prestressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program ML20212F4891999-09-22022 September 1999 Proposed Rev to TS SR 3.8.1.13,to Include Upper Limit for DG Loading for 2 H Portion of SR ML20211J5511999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Level of Approval Authority for Deviations from Guidelines Provided to Minimize Unit Staff Overtime Specified in TS 5.2.2 ML20211J7281999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be in IAW with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Noted in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20211E9111999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relaxing Slave Relay Test Frequency from Quarterly to Refueling Frequency ML20196L3181999-05-18018 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs 3.8.1.3 & 3.8.1.13 Reducing Loading Requirements for DGs ML20205S3791999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 3.3.5.2 & Associated Bases to Allow Loss of Voltage & Degraded Voltage Trip Setpoints to Be Treated as Nominal Values in Same Manner as Trip Setpoints for RTS & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20205Q7901999-04-13013 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be Consistent with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Appear in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20154M9961998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting & Modifing Conditions Which Were Issued with Licenses That Are Now Obsolete ML20151U2011998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Licenses NPF-68 & NPF-81,changing TS to Support Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source Range & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236R4661998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Periodic Response Time Testing Requirements on Selected Sensors & Selected Protected Channels ML20154Q8611998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Since Implementation of Improved TS on 970123 Through Aug 1998 ML20206N3131998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236F1631998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.3.6 Re CVI Instrumentation & LCO 3.9.4 Re Containment Penetrations to Facilitate Outage Planning ML20247K5041998-05-15015 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising New Program 5.5.18 to Extent That Items B,C & D. Refer to LCO Action Statement & Bases Insert for New Required Actions B.5.1 & B.5.2 ML20247G9471998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.7, RCP Flywheel Insp Program, Specifying Alternate Flywheel Insp Once Every Ten Years ML20216J4971998-04-16016 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20199E5351998-01-27027 January 1998 Complete Replacement of All Typed Pages of TS Changes Submitted in Ltr LCV-0849-E ML20199A4131998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Conditions for DG for Extended DG Completion Time of Fourteen Days ML20199J6651997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Changing Capacity of Unit 1 Spent Fuel Storage Pool from 288 to 1476 Assemblies & Revising Design Features Description to Reflect Criticality Analyses & Storage Cell Spacing ML20199G3901997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Facilitating Treatment of Trip Setpoints as Nominal Values & Correct Certain Typos ML20211N2451997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Typed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel Storage ML20217H9051997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel storage.W/marked-up Pages ML20141A8541997-06-13013 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.4.10 to Reduce Nominal Set Pressure by 1% to 2460 & Increase Tolerance to +2% ML20133L3081997-01-10010 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.1-1 Re Amends 96 & 74 ML20132C4711996-12-12012 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contingency Plan ML20117N5851996-09-13013 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1 Re AC Electrical Sources ML20129A6461996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Updated Documentation for License Amends Application for Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator ML20117C4151996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Convert Units 1 & 2 Based on NUREG 1431 ML20117N6471996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.3.1,allowing Use of Fuel Assemblies Containing Fuel Rods Clad W/Zirlo ML20117N6361996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements of TS SR 4.8.1.1.2.j (2) That Prescribes Pressure Test of Portions of Diesel fuel-oil Sys Designed to Section Iii,Subsection Nd of ASME Code ML20111A5501996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Extended DG AOT to 14 Days from Discovery of Failure to Meet Lco,Provided Standby Auxiliary Transformer Available ML20101D4151996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion Based on NUREG-1431 ML20100G0371996-02-19019 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Based on NUREG-1431 ML20097A3171996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Improved TS Based on NUREG-1431 ML20095J2501995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Use of Option B of 10CFR50,App J for Type B & C Testing ML20094N4071995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing TS to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20093K2281995-10-16016 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Footnote to Spec 4.6.1.2.d Stating That Type B & C Tests Scheduled for Refueling Outage 1R6 Will Be Conducted Per Option B of 10CFR50 App J & Using Guidance of RG 1.163,Rev 0 ML20098C1471995-10-0202 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Next Type a Test to Be Rescheduled ML20098A4861995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing VEGP TS Requirements to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20086G5691995-07-0606 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.8.3.1,Page 3/4 8-15 Re Footnote & Bases & Expansion ML20085G7171995-06-14014 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying in Revised Bases of 3/4 Chapter 8,that Alignment of Standby Auxiliary Transformer Intended to Be Temporary Alignment & Will Be Utilized When Normal Preferred Offsite Power Source,Rat Unavailable ML20083M0731995-05-12012 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 4.1.6.2 to Support Exemption from 10CFR50,App J Type a Test Schedule ML20083A1391995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Automatic Load Sequencer to Plant TS ML20082D9881995-04-0404 April 1995 Proposed Tech Spec Page 6-7 Reflecting Corrected Terminology Re Composition of Plant Review Board ML20081J5031995-03-17017 March 1995 Proposed TS 3.9.4 Re Containment Airlock Doors to Be Open During Fuel Movement ML20081D1591995-03-17017 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.3-8, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation, Deleting Loop Numbers 551,552,553 & 554 ML20082E7731995-03-0404 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Plant Review Board Composition ML20080N2451995-02-28028 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Accident Montoring Instrumentation 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217G6571999-10-13013 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS to Permit Relaxation of Allowed Bypass Test Times & Completion Times for LCOs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 ML20217B1221999-10-0404 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 5.5.6 Incorporating Exceptions to Reg Guide 1.35,rev 2,as Described in FSAR Section 3.8.1.7.2 Re Prestressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program ML20212F4891999-09-22022 September 1999 Proposed Rev to TS SR 3.8.1.13,to Include Upper Limit for DG Loading for 2 H Portion of SR ML20211J5511999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Level of Approval Authority for Deviations from Guidelines Provided to Minimize Unit Staff Overtime Specified in TS 5.2.2 ML20211J7281999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be in IAW with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Noted in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20211E9111999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relaxing Slave Relay Test Frequency from Quarterly to Refueling Frequency ML20196L3181999-05-18018 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs 3.8.1.3 & 3.8.1.13 Reducing Loading Requirements for DGs ML20205S3791999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR 3.3.5.2 & Associated Bases to Allow Loss of Voltage & Degraded Voltage Trip Setpoints to Be Treated as Nominal Values in Same Manner as Trip Setpoints for RTS & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20205Q7901999-04-13013 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Updating Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 to Be Consistent with Versions of LCO 3.0.4 & SR 3.0.4 as Appear in Rev 1 to NUREG-1431 ML20154M9961998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting & Modifing Conditions Which Were Issued with Licenses That Are Now Obsolete ML20151U2011998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Licenses NPF-68 & NPF-81,changing TS to Support Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source Range & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236R4661998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Periodic Response Time Testing Requirements on Selected Sensors & Selected Protected Channels ML20154Q8611998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Since Implementation of Improved TS on 970123 Through Aug 1998 ML20206N3131998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Nuclear Instrumentation Sys Source & Intermediate Range Channels & post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Sys ML20236F1631998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.3.6 Re CVI Instrumentation & LCO 3.9.4 Re Containment Penetrations to Facilitate Outage Planning ML20248K5801998-05-25025 May 1998 Rev 1 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Valve IST Program ML20247K5041998-05-15015 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising New Program 5.5.18 to Extent That Items B,C & D. Refer to LCO Action Statement & Bases Insert for New Required Actions B.5.1 & B.5.2 ML20247G9471998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.7, RCP Flywheel Insp Program, Specifying Alternate Flywheel Insp Once Every Ten Years ML20216J4971998-04-16016 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1 & 3.3.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys & ESFAS Instrumentation ML20199E5351998-01-27027 January 1998 Complete Replacement of All Typed Pages of TS Changes Submitted in Ltr LCV-0849-E ML20199A4131998-01-22022 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Conditions for DG for Extended DG Completion Time of Fourteen Days ML20198P6961998-01-16016 January 1998 Revised Spent Fuel Pool Boron Dilution Analysis ML20216B2621997-12-11011 December 1997 Rev 14 to ODCM, for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant ML20199G3901997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Facilitating Treatment of Trip Setpoints as Nominal Values & Correct Certain Typos ML20199J6651997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Changing Capacity of Unit 1 Spent Fuel Storage Pool from 288 to 1476 Assemblies & Revising Design Features Description to Reflect Criticality Analyses & Storage Cell Spacing ML20211N2451997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Typed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel Storage ML20217H9051997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Credit for Boron & Enrichment Increase for Fuel storage.W/marked-up Pages ML20141A8541997-06-13013 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising LCO 3.4.10 to Reduce Nominal Set Pressure by 1% to 2460 & Increase Tolerance to +2% ML20148E6481997-05-15015 May 1997 Rev 0 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Pump IST Program ML20148E6611997-05-15015 May 1997 Rev 0 to VEGP Units 1 & 2 Second 10-Yr Interval Valve IST Program ML20133L3081997-01-10010 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.1-1 Re Amends 96 & 74 ML20140J4591996-12-13013 December 1996 Rev 11 to ODCM for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, ML20138F1001996-12-13013 December 1996 Revs 10 & 11 to ODCM, Part 2 ML20132C4711996-12-12012 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contingency Plan ML20134J9841996-10-0808 October 1996 /Unit 2 Fuel Assembly Insp Program ML20117N5851996-09-13013 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.1 Re AC Electrical Sources ML20129A6461996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Updated Documentation for License Amends Application for Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator ML20117C4151996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Convert Units 1 & 2 Based on NUREG 1431 ML20117N6361996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements of TS SR 4.8.1.1.2.j (2) That Prescribes Pressure Test of Portions of Diesel fuel-oil Sys Designed to Section Iii,Subsection Nd of ASME Code ML20117N6471996-06-17017 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.3.1,allowing Use of Fuel Assemblies Containing Fuel Rods Clad W/Zirlo ML20111A5501996-05-0606 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Extended DG AOT to 14 Days from Discovery of Failure to Meet Lco,Provided Standby Auxiliary Transformer Available ML20106H2391996-03-31031 March 1996 Rev 10 to Gap Security Dept Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Nuclear Security Training & Qualification Plan ML20101D4151996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion Based on NUREG-1431 ML20100G0371996-02-19019 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Based on NUREG-1431 ML20097A3171996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Improved TS Based on NUREG-1431 ML20096G8241996-01-22022 January 1996 Inservice Insp Program, for VEGP-2 ML20095J2501995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Use of Option B of 10CFR50,App J for Type B & C Testing ML20094N4071995-11-20020 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Existing TS to Format & Content of NUREG-1431 ML20093K2281995-10-16016 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Footnote to Spec 4.6.1.2.d Stating That Type B & C Tests Scheduled for Refueling Outage 1R6 Will Be Conducted Per Option B of 10CFR50 App J & Using Guidance of RG 1.163,Rev 0 ML20098C1471995-10-0202 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Next Type a Test to Be Rescheduled 1999-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
. .
P 4
ENCLOSURE 3 V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT l i
REQUEST TO REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 4.0.2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR INCORPORATION The proposed change to the Vogtle Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications would be incorporated as follows:
Remove Pace Insert Paae ,
3/4 0-2 3/4 0-2 B 3/4 0-2 B 3/4 0-2 l
1 l
l l
l i 1
9001230308 900115 ;
PDR ADOCK0500g4 P
APPLICABILITY ;
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (Continued) I P
3.0.5 Unless specifically noted, all the information provided in the Limiting Condition for Operation including the associated ACTION requirements shall apply to each unit individually. In those cases where a specification makes ) ,
reference to systems or components which are shared by both units, the affected systems or components will be clearly identified in parentheses or footnotes declaring the reference to be " common". Whenever the Limiting Condition for Operation refers to systems or components which are common, the ACTION requirements will apply to both units simultaneously. (This will be indicated in the ACTION section.) Whenever certain portions of a specification refer to systems, components, operating parameters, setpoints, etc. , which are different for each unit, this will be identified in parentheses or footnotes '
or in the APPLICABILITY section as. appropriate.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0.1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual Limiting Conditions for Operation unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.
4.0.2 Each Surveil nce Requirement shall be performed within the specified ,
timeintervalwitj gmaximumallowableextensionnottoexceed25%ofthesurveillance interval
- b. The :;;bined ti= interv:1- for :ny thr:: :::::::tiv: ;re:il kn:: ,
intervels sh:11 n:t ex:::d 3.25 tin : th: :p::ified : rv:i' hn::
-i nte rv:1.
4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the specified time interval shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a Limiting Condition for Operation. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual specifications. Surveillance Requirements do '
not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.
4.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement (s) at.sociated with the Limiting Condition for Operation has been performed within the stated surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. ),
\
V0GTLE UNITS - 1 & 2 3/4 0-2
i ' APPLICABILITY BASES 4
4.0.1 This specification provides that surveillance activities necessary I to ensure the Limiting Conditions for Operation are met and will be performed during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions for which the Limiting Condi- ),
tions for Operation are applicable. Provisions for additional surveillance activities to be performed without regard to the applicable OPERATIONAL MDDES or other conditions are provided in the individual Surveillance Requirements. -
Surveillance Requirements for Special Test Exceptions need only be performed :
when the Special Test Exception is being utilized as an exception to an individual specification. '
i 4.0.2 The provisions of this specification provide allowable toleranc2s for performing surveillance activities beyond tl.ose specified in the nominal surveillance interval. These tolerances are necessary to provide operational flexibility because of scheduling and perfomance considerations. The phrase "at least" associated with a surveillance frequency does not negate this allowable tolerance value and permits the performance of more frequent ,
surveillance activities.
N8PI AC '- P.:
. .. t: h ,;; .d a
- , M r.
- 'th- M ,M-d y c ;;,;;; M y n :-
wns .u__ . . _ _ . . , . ____,,,_,__s.. ___ _>_ m .____..__m .m __,,_us-
, innRT E.':. :::1.s'"7ll':"l ' '.:' ' W :'": . ' "I' .' : "_,'".1"'G . '"','. .a"_ '_' ' :'" ' '
2 _"
. . , . . . 7. :'. ..: :. '.". . . ;. :. ..L .: ;. . ~. ~ u. . .'. ' :,.' .;. ',,:, ,, ":.:,,: ,: ;, ", L. . .' ' ,. L'"..: _. ' ' i. ". ' ' ' " ' = ' '
I i 4.0.3 The provisions of this specification set forth the criteria for i determination of compliance with the OPERABILITY requirements of the Limiting Conditions for Operation. Under these criteria, equipment, systems or compo--
l nents are assumed to be OPERABLE if the associated surveillance activities have '
been satisfactorily perfomed within the specified time interval. Nothing in i this provision is to be construed as defining equipment, systems or components OPERABLE when such items are found or known to be inoperable although still meeting the Surveillance Requirements. Items may be determined inoperable during use, during surveillance tests, or in accordance with this specification.
4.0.4 This specification ensures that the surveillance activities b associated with a Limiting Condition for Operation have been performed within the specified time interval prior to entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other applicable condition. The intent of this provision is to ensure that surveil-1ance activities have been satisfactorily demonstrated on a current basis as '
required to meet the OPERABILITY requirements of the Limiting Condition for Operation.
Under the terms of this specification, for example, during initial plant h STARTUP or following extended plant outages, the applicable surveillance F activities must be performed within the stated surveillance interval prior to placing or returning the system or equipment into OPERABLE status.
l V0GTLE UNITS - 1 & 2 B 3/4 0-2 L _, __ , _ _ ._.. _ _ _ -- - - -
f INSERT i
The allowable tolerance also provides flexibility to accommodate the length of a '
fuel cycle for surveillances that are performed at each refueling outage and are specified with an 18 month surveillance interval. It is not intended that this
)rovision be used repeatedly as a convenience to extend surveillance intervals seyond that specified for surveillances that are not performed during refueling t outages. The limitation of Specification 4.0.2 is based on engineering
- judgement and the recognition that the most probable result of any ) articular surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance wit 1 the :
Surveillance Requirements. This provision is sufficient to ensure that the reliability ensured through surveillance activities is not significantly degraded beyond that obtained from the specified surveillance interval. ,
a I
4 4
I
J APPLICABILITY l
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (Cont %ued) l 3.0.5 Unless specifically noted, all the information provided in the Limiting i i Condition for Operation including the associated ACTION requirements shall-l apply to each unit individually. In those cases where a specification makes reference to systems or components which are shared by both units, the affected i
systems.or components will be clearly identified in parentheses or footnotes.
' declaring the reference to be " common". Whenever the Limiting Condition.for Operation refers to systems or components which are common, the ACTION l requir m us will apply to both units simultaneously. (This will be indicated in tb AC' ION section.) Whenever certain portions of a specification refer to systems, components, operating parameters, setpoints, etc., which are dif ferent for each unit, this will be identified in parentheses or footnotes or in the APPLICABILITY section as appropriate.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0.1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual Limiting Conditions for l Operation unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.
1 4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified time interval with a neximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval.
- 4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the specified time interval shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a Limiting Condition for Operation. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual specifications. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment, 4.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition shall not be-i made unless the Surveillance Requirement (s) associated with the Limiting l Condition for Operation has been performed within the stated surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. t l
V0GTLE UNITS - 1 & 2 3/4 0-2
~. .
APPLICABILITY BASES 4.0.1 This specification provides that surveillance activities necessary to ensure the Limiting Conditions for Operation are met and will be performed during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions for which the Limiting Condi-tions for Operation are applicable. Provisions for additicnal surveillance activities to be performed without regard to the applicable OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions are provided in the individual Surveillance Requirements. '
Surveillance Requirements for Special Test Exceptions need only be performed when the Special Test Exception is being utilized as an exception to en individual specification. *'
4.0.2 The provisions of this specification provide allowable tolerances for performing surveillt.nce activities beyond those specified in the nominal surveillance interval. These tolerances are necessary to provide operational flexibility because of scheduling and performance considerations. The phrase "at least" associated with a surveillance frequency does not negate this allowable tolerance value and permits the performance of more frequent ,
surveillance activities.
The allowable tolerance also provides flexibility to accommodate the length of a fuel cycle for surveillances that are performed at each refueling outage and are specified with an 18 month surveillance interval. It is not intended that this provtsion be used repeatedly as a convenience to extend surveillance intervals beyond that specified for surveillances that are not performed during refueling outages. The limitation of Specification 4.0.2 is based on engineering judgement and the recognition that'the most probable result of any particular surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance with the >
Surveillance Requirements. This provision is sufficient to ensure that the reliability ensured through surveillance activities is not significantly degraded beyond that obtained from the specified surveillance interval.
4.0.3 The provisions of this specification set forth the criteria for determination of compliance with the OPERABILITY requirements of the Limiting Conditions for Operation. Under these criteria, equipment, systems or compo-nents are assumed to be OPERABLE if the associated surveillance activities have been satisf actorily performed within the specified time interv'al. Nothing in-l this provision is to be construed as defining equipment, systems or components OPERABLE when such items are found or known to be inoperable although still meeting the Surveillance Requirements. Items may be determined inoperable during use, during surveillance tests, or in accordance with this specification.
4.0.4 This. specification ensures that the surveillance activities associated with a Limiting Condition for Operation have been performed within.
the specified time interval prior to entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other applicable condition. The intent of this provision is to ensure that surveil-lance activities have been satisfactorily demonstrated on- a current basis as required to meet the OPERABILITY requirements of the Limiting Condition for Operation.
Under the terms of this specification, for example, during initial plant STARTUP or following extended plant outages, the applicable surveillance activities must be performed within the stated surveillance interval prior to placing or returning the system or equipment into OPERABLE status.
V0GTLE UNITS - 1 & 2 B 3/4 0-2