ML20005G887
| ML20005G887 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1990 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eury L CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9001230246 | |
| Download: ML20005G887 (3) | |
Text
_
/
7 w dh..'...,,. i;.... [
Uf4 0 a8co c
q\\~
"' C
/
UNITED STATES
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
c 5
W ASHINGT ON, D. C. 20$$$
Jan. 19,1990 Docket No. 50-400 l
l j~
Mr. L. W. Eury Executive Vice President
[
Power Supply Carolina Power and Light Company Post Office Box 1551 l
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Eury:
SUBJECT:
SHEARON HARRIS HUttEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 - REGULATORY EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW L
1his letter conveys the conclusions of the Repl. dory Effectiveness kevier (REF) cenducted by the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulotten at 1
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 1. from December 11-15, 1989.
l 1
The RER team was conposed of NRC personnel assisted by ren6ers of the U.S.
Army Special. Forces. The purpose of the RER progr4m is to assure that l
safeguards implementco at licensed power reactors meet NRC performance ubjectives and thet 14RC Safeguards regulations adequately support those objectives.
j The RER conclusions are decumented in the er closed report (Part I, Safeguards Systems Effectiveness Review; Part II, Safety / Safeguards i
Interface Review; and Part 111, Vital Area Definition). This enclosure, i
which contains safeguards information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21, will not be placed in the Public Document Room, and must be protected against unauthorized disclosure.
i Part 1, Section 1.2, of the report defines the categories of the team's findings. As noted in the report, a number of the elements of the Harris safeguards program were found to be notable safeguards strengths. The number of these strengths and the fact that no significant inadequacies were identified are indicative of the general high quality of your prograns.
The team did identify some program concerns. We believe that correction of those concerns could result in significant improvement in your site's l
safeguards program effectiveness and/or the impact of the safeguards program on safe operations of the plant.
The enclosed report does not convey any new regulatory requirenent.
Its findings have been considered with respect to your ability to meet the dg
)
generalperformanceobjectiveandrequirementsof10CFR73.55(a). We request that you review the report and provide a response to this, office Sci-within 45 days after receiving this letter. Your response should include 3,, pins g
a discussion of why you believe corrective action is not warranted for any.pdf g of those 1indings that you do not intend to correct.
5.'
M' D#
c C VidaScr. M.'
w wwm. m..c.'i.
u** rn~.. :.m.. e M
~
9001230246 900119 PDR ADOCK 03000400
- k
- c
(
Jan. 19, 1990 t....w..............
g L
Mr. L. W. Eury L l
f The reporting and/or record keeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L. 96 511.
l Sincerely, i
l Steven A. Varga, Director y
Division of Reactor Projects. 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Effectiveness Review I
Requistory(Part 1. Safeguards System i
Report Effectiveness Review, Part !!,
l Safety / Safeguards Interface Review,
.l Part111,VitalAreaDefinition)
)
rti WE Y.
-cc.w/ enclosures:
r3.*;;r:
'.g g.jg i
...,:i,0" j
J. Tedrow, SRI U"-U U
.cc w/o enclosures:
See next page DISTRIB_UTION W/0 ENC.050RES
)1STklBUTION W/ ENCLOSURES R5GB r/f F )R W/D ATTACHMEhT B DRIS r/f RDube
. Docket Files (50 400)
CMoore(2)
D0rrik RSGB RER Shearon Harris File BGrinws MWarren R. Keimig, RI PMcKee BMencelsohn D. McGuire, Rll PAnderson, NRR RBecker, NRR J. Creed, Rll!
GHolahan, NRR EAdensam, NRR D. Powers, RIV WStansberry, RII Gleines M. Schuster, RV JZwolinski, NRR
- See previous concurrence, orc
- NRR/R55B
- NRF/R5GB
- NRR/R5GB
- NRR/R5GB
- NRR/Rb5B Region II
- NRR/R56B
......:............:............:...........:............:...........:...........g::.............
NAME 3CMoore*
- MWarren*
- D0rri k*
- BMendelsohn*:RDube*
- WStansberry PMcKee*
.DATE : 1/10/90
- 1/10/90
- 1/10/90
- 1/10/90
- 1/10/90
- 1/18/90
- 1/10/90 Of0
- Ac tDD:DRIS :NRR/DR15:D :LA FDII-l
- PM:FDI1 1
- D:FDII.1
- ActD UR5P
- D:DR58 s J......
......:............:............:............:............:...........:. 1
(.......:..
NAME :Glainas
- BGrimes*
- PAnderson*
- RBecker*
- EAdensam*
- Whr ga DATE
/ /90...: 1/11/90.. : 1/17/90
- .1/17/90....: 1/17/90
.: I/19/90
.:i/
0 UttJLIAL KLLUKU LUFT
'I idk d Ni
.... L l lM $
. ~.
2 lO Jan. 19, 1990 Mr. L. W. Eury Carolina Power & Lignt Company Shearvn harris Cc:
Vr. R. E. Jones, General Counsel Regional Adrninistrator, Region 11 Larolina Power & Light Comp 6ny U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission P. O. Bcx 1551 101 Marietta Street i
Raleigh, North Carolitia 27601 Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Resident Inspector / Harris NPS c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormission Fr. C. S. Hinnant Route 1 Box 3 HL Plant General Manager New Hill, North Carolina 27562 Harris Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 105 Mr. R. R. Richey, nager New Hill, North Carolir.a 27502
' Harris IMitar Project llarris Nur. lear Plen*
Hr. Deyne H. Brown, Director P. C. Eox HS Dep6rtrent of Environnental, New !!ill, horth Carolsna 27502 liealth and Natural resources Divistor, of Raciation Frotection Mr. H. A. Ccle P. O. Box 275B7 Special Deputy Attorney General Raleigh, North Carolina 27C11-7687 Statt of Mrth Carolina P. O. Ecx 629 Raleigh, North Caroline 27602 i
i, e
--un w--
e
,