ML20005D884
| ML20005D884 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/08/1989 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005D885 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9001020145 | |
| Download: ML20005D884 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1989028
Text
.i'
,
,/
.b
.
,,
..
[
x
DEC - 81989
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
Irvine Operations Center
23 Parker
Irvine, California 92718
Attention:
Mr. Harold B. Ray, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing Department
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION OF SAN ON0FRE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3
'
This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. G. Cicotte of this
office on October 16-20, October-30-November 3 and November 8,.1989
activities authorized by NRC License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10, and NPF-15, of
, and to
=the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Cicotte with Mr. R. Krieger and
other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
. examinations of-)rocedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel, and caservations by the inspector.
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC recuirements, as set
forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appencix A.
In relation to the violation identified in Appendix A, we invite your
attention to 3aragraphs 2.A and 2.F of the enclosed inspection report.
The
findings in tie area of respiratory protective equipment maintenance tend to
indicate a lack of attention to detail, inadequate training and insufficient
supervisory oversight.
These findings might indicate a declining trend in
performance for the radiation protection program..
Additionally, subsequent to the inspection your staff p'rovided to us an audit
report of respiratory protection which concluded that respirators are
properly cleaned, maintained, selected and issued."
It is clear your self
assessment of this program did not present an accurate appraisal to senior
station management.
We urge you to evaluate whether this could be indicative
of a more general problem with your internal audit system.
Your response to this Notice is to be submitted in accordance with the
provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violation.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
9001020145 891208
ADOCK 05000206
Q
7
_ - - - - - - - -
-
--
--
- - - -
-
-
c--
!'
' '
[
_..-
,
,
. ,
,
-2-
DEC - 8 1999
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
. procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
Ross A.
arano, Director
Division of Radiation Safety and
Safeguards
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Inspection Report Nos. 50-206/89-28, 50-361/89-28, and 50-362/89-28
cc w/ enclosures:
D. J. Fogarty, SCE
R. H. Bridenbecker, SCE (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, SCE (San Clemente) State of California
bec w/ enclosures:
Docket File
ProjectInspector
Resident Inspector
G. Cook
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
A. Johnson
T. Foley, NRR
bcc w/o enclosure 2:
J. Zollicoffer
M. Smith
REGION V
6
[
'
GCicotte/jg
FWenslawski
GYuhas
AJoip/89
son
RSc rano
12
89
12/l[/89
12/$/89
12//p
12/
/
7 89
KhQUE51 COPY )REQt(EST COPY J jfEQUE)/51 COPY J REQUESI EDPy J RE
1 COPY J
/ NO
OYES 1/ N0
] 6'ES /
NO
] YES / /N0 / ~
/ N0
'
v
-
-
y,qga .
-
r
-
-
.