ML20005B324
| ML20005B324 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1981 |
| From: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Bouchey G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8107070131 | |
| Download: ML20005B324 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _...
s
~
~
~
JUN 9 ggg
/f
,t
.f 7
'l
[ ~ 811 LJ Docket Nos.:
50-460/513
-8 JUN13 68 W 7
']9 vis. tmIA" Mr. G. D. Bouchey Director, Nuclear Safety
\\
Mashington Public Power Supply Systen D
q Post Office Box 968 0
300 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 993522
Dear Fr. Bouchey:
SUBJECT:
HTILIZATION OF WP-2 FSAR GEOLOGY AND SEIS"0 LOGY SECTIONS (SECTION 2.5) IN THE WNP-1/4 FSAR; DOCKET N05. 50-460 AND 50-513 In your letter nur.ber G0L-81-121 dated April 28, 1981 you requested HRC concurrence to omit subsect lons 2.5.1 through 2.5.3 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAP.)
for UFPSS Huclear Proje.:ts 1 and 4 (WNP-1/4) and referencing the corresponding sections of the WNP-2 FSAR in the WNP-1/4 FSAR. The justification was the fact that all three projects are located on the Hanford Site.
It was noted in your letter also that these sections of the WNP-2 application is undergoing active review which may yield new information which would result in an adrendment to the WHP-2 FSAR. The advantage to WPPSS and the NP.C would be a reducticn in preparation and review time of the WP-1/4 FSAR.
The staff has reviewed this request and concurs in principle with this general approach. Specifically, any subsections of the WNP-1/4 FSAR which apply generally to the region and the Hanford Site may be satisfied by referencing those specific subsections of the WNP-2 FSAR (including the applicable arend-ment to the FSAR). However, it is noted that units 1 and 4 are separated slightly by less than one kilometer from each other and that each of these units are s'ightly more than one kilometer from unit 2.
It is therefore possible, narticularly since new studies have been undertaken since submittal of the WNP-2 FSAR and the WNP-1/4 FSAR, that geologic /saisnologic conditions exist that may affect one or two but not all three of On specific siies such as surface faults and folds. Therefore, portions of subsection 2.5.3 (and possibly 2.5.2) in the WNF-1/4 FSAR would have to address the analyses of these two specific sites (i.e.
units 1 and 4).
In aadition, any relevant new information applicable to the WHP 1 or 4 sites which becomes available following issuance of the WNP-2 Safety Evalua-tion Report but prior to issue of the WNP-1/4 Safety Evaluation Report would have to be incorporated as an arendment to the WMP-1/4 FSAR.
The NRC, therefore, agrees that for purposes of acceptance review of the UNP-1/4 FSAR, sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 of the WHP-2 FSAR lincluding any applicable anen&ents) may be referenced to elininate unnecessary duplication. Spectfic omcc>
8107070131 B106093
.. eoa ^oocx osooo;64
_ _. mm.....
M t E 1r L,' M-L.........
_4 BATEk wac rosu ais oe isoisacu e24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- = = - =
4.\\i'
~
y,..
rev s
n; b.
n q.
g y
g,.
y.
. inf.9rmation relating to the WNP-1 and WNP-4 sites should be included in the WNP-1/4 FSAR.
Sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.3 of the NRC Standard Review Plan (NUREG-75/087) should be used in preparing those respective scbsections of the FSAR and FSAR amendment. Be advised that Revision 1 of the SRP is the current revision for sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.3.
Any questions on this subject should be directed to the Licensing Project Manager, Mr. R. W. liernan (301) 492-8995.
Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Acting Chief Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing
,;n,
cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION-Docket File L/PDR NRC/PDR-LB#4 Rdg EAdensam RHernan SHanauer RTedesco RVollmer
^ TMurley RMattson OELD OIE-3 J Knight RJackson bcc: TERA-ACRS (16)
a : m.......dk.d......... n u
.* c "" 4
..E nsam.....
Ca..
RRe r...........
nan
""> 52Z1.61.......5
,0.1........
..lB L.....
1
- " ' " " *2'
,cc ro u m no,eomcu ono.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY