ML20004E404
| ML20004E404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/15/1981 |
| From: | Breaux D, Brickley R, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004E390 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900501 NUDOCS 8106120134 | |
| Download: ML20004E404 (10) | |
Text
..
O
\\'J U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
99900501/31-01 Comoany:
3echtel ?cwer Ccr:: oration Ann Arbor Pcwer Division 777 East Eisenhcwer Parkway Ann Arbor, Michigan 18106 Inspection Cenducted:
March 31 - Aoril 3,1981
.l J%
}
Inspectors-
' Nv L
. r-/
h/ q 3'd /
e e_
R. H. 3_rfckley, Centrgc:3r Inscec:cr, Cate Reactor Systems Secti'on, Vendor Inscection 3 ranch
%f I
1%C d -/..vx. /
D. G. Stepux, Centrac cy sce' tor, Date c
Reactor Systems Secticn, Vendor Inscection 3 ranch M _ _,1 lf r-L'
' i f <I !
Acpreved by:
s i
C. J. -rEif,' Chief, Date Reactor'S"ystems Section, Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inscection conducted March 31 - Acril 3, 1981 (99900501/81-01)
Areas Inscected:
10 CFR Part 50, Accencix 3 in the areas af control of ccacuter cr grams, cackgrcund verif' cation of technical cerscnnel, design change centrol, design corrective action, and acticn on crevicus inscecticn findings.
he inscec-tion involved 50 inscectar-hours en site by wo NRC inscec:crs.
cesults:
In ne five areas inscectec, cne noncenicmance nas identified.
Noncenfomance:
Cesign change con rcl - Centrary Oc Engineering Decarten: 2 0-cecures, One Orawing Change and Materials Recuisiticn/Scecificaticn Legs nave not been ucdated and issued on a monthly casis.
0106120l
DETAILS SECTION I (Prepared by R. H. 3rickley)
A.
Persons Contacted J. Saranyi, Manager, Project Administration Services Gecuo R. L. Castleberry, Chief Electrical Engineer J. Dunne, Mechnical Engineer
- L. Grant, CA Manager, Audits & Program M. Jackcwski, Sucervisor, Electrical Engineering G. Morrison, Personnel Sucervisor
- M. G. O'Mara, Supervisor, Quality Engineering J. Smith, Employment Sucervisor D. Tennew, Division Personnel Manager
- 0enotes those in attendance at the Exit Interview 3.
Action en Previous Inscection Findinas 1.
(Closed)
Ceviation (Recor: No. 99900501/30-01) Microfilm (CA Record)
.of wo calculations were not legible.
The inscector verified the ccrrective actions and creventive measures ccmmitted in their letter of resconse dated December 9,1980, i.e.
legible attachments to calculatiens AFW-1 and AFW-3 were cotainec and re-microfilmed, an inspection for other illegible microfilm was conducted, an ICM ce-emchasizing the need for legibility of design documente was issued, and a new p'.*ocedure covering the screening me heds and criteria for microf11med documents was issuec.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Recort No. 99900501/20-01) The Design Interface Centrcl Log was not being maintained in the Centrol Systems Design Gecuo as required.
The inscec:cr verified the corrective actions and ::reventive measures ccmmitted in their letters of rescense dated December 9,1980, and January 5,1981, i.e. the scecific entries missing from the centrol log were corrected, a survey was cencucted en all crojects and icen-tified deficiencies corrected,.nd an ICM was issued 50 all crojects where deficiencies were found re-emchasi:ing the recuirements for con-trol of design interface centrol icgs.
C.
Backcreund Verification of Technical Personnel 1.
Obiectives The objectives of this area of the ins::ection were to verify :nat measures have been established and are being effectively imolemented that assure:
- a.
The education and work excerience information contained in employee's job acplications. are being verified by the em-cloying organization; b.
There is ocjective, documentec/ records that attest to the emoloyee's education and exoerience.
2.
Method of Acccmolishment The precec. g cbjectives were acccmolished by an examination of the background verificaticn records maintained on six cermanent emoloyees and seven " job shco" employees, acclicable employment group ro-cedures, and a "Sumnary of Actions
'/erification of Contract Per-sonnel Qualifications" (Actions re: IE Circular 30-22).
3.
Findinas a.
There were no ncnconformacnes, unresolved, cr folicw uo items identified.
'b.
Written verification of education and ex erience is recuired for all new Secntel emolcyees.
If a res;cnse tc a verificatien request is not received in 30 days, follcw up recuests are sent until a rescense is received.
c.
There are generic staffing service agreements that have been awarced by Secntel Personnel in San Francisco for the use of all Secntel Divisions.
The Midland Project was fcund to be obtaining cerson-nel under six different generic staffing service agreements.
In additien, there are three " job shco" agreements that have been awarded by and for the use of the project.
d.
Sechtel's agreement with " job shco" organizations recuire that the organization certify that they have verified the emcloyees education and experience.
Secntel has conductec audits of these organizations to verify the validity of these cert'fications.
e.
An evaluation of "jcb shcocers" performance is made after Onree months of emolayment.
During this ceriod these cecaie are cer-forming tasks under the sucervision of permanent Bechtel employees.
O, Control of Cemcuter Procrams 1.
Ob jectives The cojectives of this area of the inscection were to determine tnat:
a.
Cemcuter programs have been develcaed, verifiec, ;ualified, and are being used in accordance with crecedures which have been cre-pared reviewed, arc accroved by authcrized management.
. b.
A computer program custodian has been designated and has the resconsibility for maintaining the security of the crogram, Each ccmcuter program that has been authorized for use has been c.
qualified, has an accreariate users manual, anc this manual (cr another manual) crevides a detailed descriction of the mathemati-cal mcdel(s), emoirical data (if any), assumptions used, and applicable references.
d.
The ccmouter crogram has been verified / qualified and that dccumen-tation exists which includes:
(1)
A description of the program version and cotion(s) vali-
- dated, (2)
A detailed descriction of the tes: (benchmark) crcbiem(s),
including boundary conditions, mathematical model, and all key parameters.
(3)
A listing of the test (bencnmark) croclem incut data cnecks and a recrint of the crogram incu and outcut, er reference tc the lccation wnere tnis is stored.
(4)
The ccmcarison of solutions, evaluation of the crogram validity, and an analysis of any identified errors.
e.
Tecnnically qualified individuals have reviewec and accrevec the verification / qualification of each ccmcuter arcgram cricr to its use in safety related apolications.
f.
Revisions and modifications have been subjected to the same review and accroval as the original version of the program.
g.
Errors identified in ccmouter programs are ;rcmotly corrected and i
aparcoriately verified criar to use.
h.
Errors which could result in significant deficiencies in nuclear i
plant design are recor:ec to the NRC under the recuiraments cf 10 CFR Dar: 21, 10 CFR Part 50.55(e), and 10 CFR ?ar: 50, Accencix K, as acercoriate.
2.
Methed of Acccmolishment The creceding objectives were acccmclishec by 2n examination of the User and Theoretical Manual and '/erificatir scr: for ccmcuter cregrams NE 154, ME 499, TE 509, and TE 51.
In addition, tne inscector examined acclicable crecedures frem the Engineering Decar:-
ment Procedures Manual.
L
_a_
3.
Findings a.
There were no ncnconformance, unresolved, or follcw up items identified.
b.
Computer program NE 154 (CECAY) determines the amount of residual heat generated by light water reac:crs after shutdown.
It is used to generate decay heat generation rates for thermal design analysis, cerformance evaluation, fuel pool sizing, ultimate heat sink analysis, and con-tainment analysis.
c.
Ccmouter program ME 499 (LINE CRCP) ccmcutes :he pressure drop for incompressible, single chase ficw of licuids and gasses in a given section of pipe line using the Carcy equation.
The cregram also calculates the velocity head and the static head cue to a change in elevation.
d.
Cccouter program TE-509 (TAPCHANG) calculates bus voltage magnitudes and line ficws in an electric system for a sce-cified set of terminal or bus load conditions.
The solu-tion is obtained by the Gauss-Seicel methed using the bus admittance matrix.
e.
Ccmouter crogram TE 510 (NEWSHORT) is a shor; circuit cal-culation arcgram that can be used to determine the switch-gear rating of the auxiliary system.
The MVA methed of calculation is used.
E.
Exit Interview An exit interview was held with management recresentatives en April 3, 1981.
In addition :: these individuals indicated by an astertsk in caragraph A of each Cetails Section, those in attendance were:
K.
Sailey, Engineering Manager L. M. Christian, Project Manager L. H. Curtis, Project Engineer N. H. Eidsmce, Assistant Project Engineer J. Miiandin, Manager, Civisien QA G. L. Richardsen, CA Manager, Projects J. 3. Sullivan, Princical Engineer The inscecter discussed the sccce and findings of :he inscecticn.
'danage-ment ccmments were generally for clarification only, or ackncwledgement of the statements of the inscector.
DETAILS SECTION II (Prepared By D. G, Breaux)
A.
Person Contacted D. R. Anderson, Mechanical Greuo Sucervisor
'M. Bakaricn, Project Administrator W. R. Bird, Manager, MOAD, Consumers Power "R. C. Hillar, Project Quality Engineer
- 3. P. Xcnonetly, Electrical Group Superviscr M. Lawson. Quality Engineer G. Maule, Quality Engineer S. Sobkowski, Civil Grouc Super /isor T. E. Sceck, Civil 00E
'C. T. Springer, CA Sucervisor J. L. Wood, QA Services, MQAD, Censumers Power
- Indicates these cresent at the Exit In*erview.
3.
Desian Change Centrol 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inscection were to verify that:
a.
Procedures have been established and imclemented for controlling changes to accroved design dccuments.
b.
Design changes (resulting from tests, interference croolems, failures of structures, systems or :Occonents, discositien of nonconformances, changes in recuirements, ocerating 'sxcertence and design imorovements) are:
(1) reviewed for the imcact of the change (2) documented as to the action taken, and (3) transmitted to all affected persens and organizations.
l c.
The design changes are justifiec and subjectec to review and accroval l
by the same groucs or Organt:ations as for the Original design (see L
d.
belcw for excections).
d.
When resconsibility has been cnanged, :he designated organi:ation shall have access to the pertinent informatien, ccmcetence in :ne scecific area of design, and an understanding of :he recuirecents l
and intent of the original design.
l
e I 2.
Method of Acccmolishment The preceding objectives were acccmplished by review of the folicwing documents:
a.
Sechtel Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear ?cwer olants, Topical Report SQ-TOP-1, Revision lA, dated May, 1, 1975.
Section 3 of this Tooical Report, entitled, "Cesign Centrol,"
addresses establishment of Engineering Decartment policies, standards, design guides, procedures, and instructicns for control of engineering design work to meet technical and regulatory recuirements.
b.
Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco ?cwer Division, Midland Quality Program Job 7220, Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual.
(1)
Section II of this NOAM entitled, " Design Control."
(2)
Section !I, Numcer 2 entitled, "Cesign Control ?recedures."
(3)
Secticn II, Number 5 entitled, "Desicn Process and Change Control."
(1)
Section II, Number 10 entitled, "Scecialty Grouc Design Control."
c.
Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation Ann Arbor, Engineering Geoartment Procedures.
The folicwing EDPs from Section 1.0 entitled, " Design Execution," were reviewed for sati'sfaction of technical and regulatory recuirements:
(i)
EDPI 1.23.1 entitled, " Safety Analysis Recort Change Control for Midland Project."
(2)
ECP 4.23 entitled, " Project Q-List."
(3)
ECF a.43 entitled, " Standard Project Document Numcering System."
(1)
EDPI 2.26.3 entitled, ' Drawing Control Logs, DCN Logs, Stick Files, Accrovals, and Drawing Designatcrs, Midland Project."
(5)
EDP a.47 entitled, "Crawing Change Notice."
(5)
ECPI J.47 entitled, " Design Change Packages / Interim Drawing Change Notice for Miciend Project."
4 (7)
EDPI 4.49.1 entitled, " Specification Change Notice."
(8)
EDP a.62.1 entitled, " Project Engineering-Review of* Fteld Change Notice, Midland ?roject."
(9)
E0P 5.13 entitled, ' Control Legs."
d.
To assure that procedural recuirements are being properly and effectively performed, the following documents were reviewed:
(1) Material Requisition /Scecification and Drawing Control Log (CE3US) Midland ?roject, dated January 31, 1981.
(2)
Fifteen Drawings (Electrical, Mechanical, Civil).
(3)
Fifteen Soecifications (Electrical, Mechanical, Civ,1).
(a)
Ten Design Changes Notices (DCN).
(5)
Five Field Change Recuests (FCR).
(5)
Fifteen Occument Transmittal.:orms (Electrical, Mechanical Civil).
(7)
Ceisgn Change Notice (DCN) Log 3.
Findings a.
In this area of the inscection one nonconformance was identified.
(See Notice of Nonconformance). ~
b.
All of the Regulatory Inspection Recuirements listed in II.3.1 of this report were addressed in reviewing Sechtel procedures listed in II.3.2.a, II.3:2.b, and II.3.2.c, above.
Ali documents reviewed in II.3.2.d of this recort were processed according to Bechtel procedural requirements.
The CEBUS, referred 'to in the Notice of Ncnconformance, was uodated and issued for the mcnth of March prior to cne end of the insoec-ti on.
C.
Cesign Correc:ive Acticn 1.
Ob jectives The cojectives of this area of the insoection were to examine anc verify that:
-- ~ -., - - -
4
-4.
3.
Procedures have been established and implemented for identifying deficiencies in the design process of a significant or recurring nature, determining the cause of the deficiencies, and initiating corrective action to prevent recurrence.
b.
Deficiencies in the design crocess and the corrective action are reported to acercoriate levels of management.
c.
Follow up action is taken to assure timely ccmpletien of corrective action of a deficiency in the design process when resolution is not completed immediately.
2.
Method cf Acccmolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by review of.the fellcwing documents:
a.
Sechtel Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear ?cwer Plants, Tcpical Report 30-70P-1, Rev. l A dated May 1,1975.
Section 16 of this Tcoical, entitled, " Corrective Action."
b.
Sechtel Power Corocration, San Francisco Pcwer Division, Midland Quality Program Joe 7220, Nuclear Cuality Assurance Manual Section V Number 10 entitled, " Management Corrective Action."
c.
Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, Ann Arbor, Engineering Decartment Procedures.
The following EDP's from Secticn 4.0 entitled,
" Design Executien." were reviewed for satisfacticn of regulatory recuirements:
(1)
EDP 4.51 entitled, "Ncnconformance Recorts (NCR)."
(2)
EDP l.53 entitled, "Sucolier Deviation Disposition Recuests (SOCR)."
~
(3)
EDP 1.55 entitled, " Design Deficiency Precessing.
(1)
EDP 1.50 entitlec, " Precessing Corrective Action Recorts."
d.
To assure that crecedural recuirements are being procerly and effectively cerformed, the following dccuments:
i (1)
Supolier Deviation Diseasition Recuest Log (SDDR),
(2)
Five Sucolier Deviation Discositicn Recuests ($00R's),
' (3)
Nonconfomance Report Log (NCR),
(4)
Five Nonconfomance Recorts along with corrective action verificaticns such as calculations, and Design recuirements checklists.
(5)
Seven Management Correct Action Recorts (MCAR) Midland ?roject.
3.
Findings In this area of inspecticn, no nonconfomances, unresolved, or folicw up items were identified.
1
'