ML20004E330
| ML20004E330 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1981 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Willie Lee DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106110557 | |
| Download: ML20004E330 (4) | |
Text
g mg%
UNITED STATES 8"
@n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
g
,1 wasmucron. o. c. mss JUN 0 01981 Docket Nos.:
50-413/414
-3 q' J{Jg 09 79g f;-
fir. W.'S. Lee, President M. g %
Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street f..
'*D% 4'?
Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
\\T,<
s s
g N
Dear Mr We presently have under review almost thi'rty applications for operating licenses. For your application, as well as most others, we are committing resources to assure that staff reviews are completed on a schedule consistent with your projected plant coupletion date. Preliminary schedules for facilities projecting plant conpletion in late 1982 or in 1983 were provided to Congress on April 30, 1981 in connection with the "Bevill Report." Your schedule was developed using your estimated construction completion date and a set of stendard hearing assumptions.
The preliminary hearing schedules assume a standard eleven-month time period from the issuance of the final Supplement to the Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) to trie NRC decision date. This time period incorporates the efficiency measures projected to be in place in the near futuie.
It is based on five months from issuance of the SSER to the start of hearing, five months from start of hearing to the initial dec.sion by the Atomic Safety Licensing Board, and one month from the initial decision to the Cnmmission's decision date. These assumptions, and your relative priority, will be re-examined on a case-by-case basis after the Commission completes its consideration of proposed changes to the regulations.
To assure proper internal resources allocation, it is important that you provide us a realistic and up-to-date projected construction completion date. Berause of manpower limitations each review will be scheduled to fall 1:1 a " window" of time wherein our reviews must be completed. An unexpected change of your completion date or your ability to provide needed information in accordance with this schedule will likely have an impact on the schedule for your review. Accordingly, you should examf u your schedules i
in the attached Table and confirm or change your construction completion l
date within 14 days of receipt of this letter.
You should also provide quarterly updates thereafter until issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report for the.acility.
l l
t 810 6110 fQ g
2-JUN 0 u 1931 For the staff to meet these schedules, all information concerning your application identified as needed must be provided by you or your contractors at least eight weeks prior to the date scheduled for the issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report. You should consider arranging to have members of your staff who can represent you and who can resolve any last minute open items, in residence near the llRC offices in Bethesda for a two week period starting six weeks immediately preceding the scheduled date for issuing the Safety Evaluation Report. Your staff should contact the Licensing Project Manager for specific needs related to the review of your application.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely, hY Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page l
l l-1 l
1 w
.ase p-We'-
wr
-.-----g tem up w--I
'=P Ir-ur-*
-*-'f----
v-T
'M's y
'ty g
g' 9
---*-*W t'
T
Mr. W. S. Lee, President Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 cc: Mr. W. L. Porter Robert M. Lazo, Administrative Judge Duke Power Company Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P. O. Box 2178 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 422 South Church Street Washington, D. C.
20555 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke, Administrative Judge Mr. R. S. Howard
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Power Systems Division U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission WeLtinghouse Electric Corporation Washington, D. C.
20555 P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Dr. Richard F. Cole, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mr. E. J. Keith U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission EDS Nuclear Incorportated Washington, D. C.
20555 220 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 Mr. J. E. Houghtaling NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Mr. Jesse L. Riley, President The Carolina Environmental Study Group j
854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Ms. M.' J. Graham Resident Inspect e McGuire NPS t7o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 216 Cornelius, North Carolina 28031 Shelley Blum, Esq.
1402 Vickers Avenue Durham, North Carolina 27707
s-e TABLE 2^
CY 1983 PLANTS i
DIVISION OF LICENSING - 4/.6/81 i
ASLB NRC Applicant l
Estimated Delay issue Issue ACRS ISSUE Issue Start of Initia Occi sion Construction (Months)
DES SER MTG FES SSER Hearing (1)
Dscision(1)
Date(1)
Completion Plant I
Callaway 1/2 0
09/81 10/81 11/81 01/82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 St. Lucie 2 0
09/81 10/81 11/81 01/82 11/81 04/82 09/82 10/82 10/82 Palo Verde 1/2/3 0
10/81 11/81 12/81 02/82 12/81 C;/82 10/82 11/82 11/82
- Seabrook 1/2*
O 11/81 01/82 32/82 03/82 02/82 07/82 12/82 01/83 01/83 Clinton 1 0
11/81 01/82 02/82 03/82 02/82 07/82 12/82 01/83 01 /83 g
Wolf Creek 1 0
01/82 04/82 05/82 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/83 04/83 04/83 Byron-1/2 6
01 /02 04/82 05/82 06/82 05/82 10/82 03/83 04/83 04/83 Perry 1/2 0
02/82 05/82 06/82 07/82 06/82 11/82 04/83 05/83 05/63 Midland 1/2 0
04/82 07/82 08/82 09/82 08/82 01/83 06/83 07/83 07/83 1
- Catawba 1/2 0
05/82 08/82 09/82 10/82 09/82 02/83 07/83 08/83 08/83
- So. Texas 1/2 0
06/82 09/82 10/82 11/82
.0/82 03/83 08/83 09/83 09/83 River Bend 1/2 0
07/82 10/82 11/82 12/82 11/82 04/83 09/83 10/83 10/83 NOTES:
FSAR not tendered Schedules subject to change upon resolution of NRC and applicant construction completion differences (1) Based on a stardard eleven-month assumption from issuance of SSER to NRC Decision Date O
4 i
- -