ML20004E131
| ML20004E131 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1981 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106110233 | |
| Download: ML20004E131 (2) | |
Text
l W
a
/
Docket Hos. 50-325 04 m and 50-324 sdn' op.
pF H s Vqs Carolina Power & Light Company J
j
)
ATTN: Mr. E. E. Utley i
Executive Vice President
[
JUN 0 51981 a--
8 l
Power Supply and Engineering N M*^"8 l
and Construction N
33G Fayetteville Street Q
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 9
Centlemen:
We have received copies of the following applications which were filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (0NRR) for certain Technical Specification changes relating to Brunswick Unit Nos. I and 2:
1.
November 13, 1980 application for changes to Control Rod Sciam Discharge Volume Capability, and 2.
April 16,1981 application for Spent Fuel Pool Storage
'l Expansion.
s Fees pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 were not remitted for item 1 above because your Company determined that it was exempt under Footnote 2 of 10 CFR 170.22 since it was in response to a July 7,1980 written NRC request. A Class IV fee of
$12.300 was remitted with item 2 above.
Based on the ONRR staff's preliminary fee analyses fo:- these applications, it has been determinea that:
1.
Item 1 above will involve consideration of a single safety issue, and it was not requested for the convenience of the NRC to simplify the license or Technical Specifications.
Therefore, 2 Class III fee of $4,000 is due for one of the units and a Class I duplicate fee of $400 is due for the other unit.
2.
Item 2 above is properly classified as a Class IV for one unit; however, a Class I duplicate unit fee of $400 is due for the other unit.
f 819611o233 i
4 w
q y
j
~.
Carolina Power & Light Company 2
It is requested that your company remit a total of $4,800 to our office for the above referenced applications.
If the ONRR staff's final fee determinations reflect that these fees are incorrect, your Company will be notified and any necessary adjustments will be made.
To qualify for an exemption under the provisions of the second sentence of Footnote 2, an application for amendment / approval must meet all of the criteria set forth in that sentence (i.e., the application must be as a result of a U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission (USNRC) request for it, and must be a Class I, II or III type amendment / approval request that has only minor safety significance which is being issued for the convenience of the USNRC to simplify or clarify the license or Technical Specifications). When this sentence was added to Footnote 2, it was for the purpose of exempting from "ees such applications as those that an inspector from the Office of Inspection and Enforcement mignt request a licensee to submit because a specification was found to be ambiguous.
Also, in this exemption category are USNRC requests to licensees to convert old form Technical Specificacions (T3) to standard TS.
If an application clearly meets all of the criteria of the sentence, it is generally exenpted from fees.
Sincerely.
O,-iginal Signed by, wm. o.:.nner i
William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch j
Office of Administration DISTRIBUTION:
PDR LPDR f
Docket Files (2) s JHannon, ORD-2 SNorris, ORB-2 LFMB Reactor Files (3)
RMDiggs, Lat3 LFMB R/F (2)
I
.L tFMB:ADM L.Fi, ome.)
.........h..........,W,0,t,,,,,,,e, p,,,,,,,
C,@,$,9wa,y,,,
su-. >..R,,,,,,, g : y,ml,
. 61.31.a1.........61.'.~t.a1...........sQ1.a1........
9 om>
--m
-u-