ML20004D295

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810209-12
ML20004D295
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/1981
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20004D293 List:
References
50-302-81-03, 50-302-81-3, NUDOCS 8106090124
Download: ML20004D295 (1)


Text

.

O APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River 3 License No. DPR-72 As a result of the inspection conducted on February 9-12, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violations were identified.

A.

Environmental Technical Specification 5.5.1 requires that explicit written procedures be prepared and adhered to for operation of all systems and components involved in carrying out the effluent release program.

Proce-dure CH-213, " Quality Control Requirements for Radiochemistry Procedures,"

requires semiannual interlaboratory crosschecks for analyses associated with effluent releases.

Contrary to the above, Procedure CH-213 was not adhered to in that inter-laboratory crosschecks were n:,t carried out during 1980 for gross beta, gamma spectral, and tritium analyses of radwaste samples.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E).

B.

Environmental Technical Specification 5.5.2 requires that all procedures implemented by plant staff personnel for carrying out the effluent release program, and changes thereto, be reviewed by NGRC and approved by the Plant Manager prior to implementation.

Contrary to the above, on February 10, 1980, chemistry procedures (200 series) used for implementation of the effluent monitoring program had not been reviewed by the NGRC and approved by the Plant Manager.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to' this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act l

of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

j Date:

8106090/8

<