ML20003C047
| ML20003C047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1981 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Stewart W FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8102260513 | |
| Download: ML20003C047 (2) | |
Text
TIC i
4-^
f_ y %%,
UNITED STATES yisw g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.y WASM NG TON. O. C. 20555
\\ ['[. *'/
S FE31: Est Docket No. 50-302 4'I hs,
[ ('ll(~h
[.
Florida Power Corporation ATTN: Mr. W. P. Stewart 2
FEB 17 iggj p IS Manager, Nuclear Operations R
~
P.O. Box 14042 - C-4 q%_ca,.#
6 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 h
Gentlemen:
We have received copies of the following applications from your comoany which were filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (CNRR) for review of changes relating to the Crystal River Unit 3 Technical Specifications (TS):
1.
Application dated April 23,1980 (Change Request No. 62) for the deletion of non-radiological environmental TS.
2.
Application dated September 15, 1980 (Change Rquest No. 64, Revision 1) for TMI-2 Lessons Learned Category "A" TS changes in response to ONRR's letter dated July 2,1980.
With item 1 above, a Class II fee of $1,200 was remitted pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 because you deternined that the request is administrative in nature. Although your company determined that a Class IV fee is applicable for item 2 above, you stated that no fee was being remitted since ONRR's July 2 letter informed you that licensing action associated with TMI-2 Lessons Learned would be exempt from fees. By letter dated August 7,1980 (copy enclosed), ONRR advised all operating power reactor licensees that the exemption stated in the July 2 letter was not justified, and that' licensees should include fees pursuant tc 10 CFR 170.22 for responses to the July 2 letter. Therefore, licensees who have not paid fees are being requested to do so.
Based on information provided by the ONRR staff as a result of a preliminary review of item 1 above, it'has been detennined that fees should not be charged for deletion of the non-radiological aquatic LCO's and other non-radiological aquatic monit., ring requirements in cases where licensees have an effective NPCES.
On this basis, we have concluded that an exemption pursuant to 10 CFR 170.ll(b) from the fee requirements is hereby authorized by law for your April 23 application and such exemption is othemise in the public interest.
In connection with item 2 above, the CNRR staff has advised us that the review of this application involves consideration of several separate s>fety issues. As such, this application requires a Clac! IV fee of 512,300.
81022sc 9 3 7
en-e y
r.
N REB 1, 361 Mr. W. P. Stewart 2
Rather than refund your company the 51,200 for item 1 above, we are applying it to the 512,300 due for item 2, and we request that you remit an additional sum of $11,100 to this office to complete the total due for item 2.
We hope your company finds this transaction to be an acceptable one.
If the ONRR staff's final review of your September 15 application reveals that the Class IV fee is incorrect, an adjustment will be made.
Sincerely, e(O h, lbh William 0. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration
Enclosure:
Letter dated 8-07-80 k
V
[
N w
-e-r-3-
g T
di'
-g-its r'3e-g g-T
=MJ'-
a
N
.p n%
,, {
UNITED STATES
+
s i
~ g NUCLEAR REGULATOR'r C."'17.WSSION J, '; ~e c j
WASMNGTON D. C. W.4 C,
e
/
Augus: 7, 1980 TO ALL OPERATING POWER REACTOR LICENSEES By my letters dated July 2,1980 (References 1 & 2), I transmitted sample Technical Specifications associated with TMI-2 Lessons Learned Category "A" items. That letter included a ;:reliminary determination by the staff that licensing action associated with TMI-2 Lessons Learned would be exempt from fee per 10 CFR 170.11. We have reviewed the initial determination and now detemine that such exemption frcm fee is not justi-fied. Therefore, please disregard that previous detemination. Your sub-mittal in response to our request should include your proposed Class of Amendment pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22.
Sincerely,
,u Q 7 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References:
REACTORS, dated 7/2/80.
[
$(
s 1.
NRC ltr. to ALL SOILING WATER 2.
NRC ltr. to A'.L PRESSURIZED
(/
gl WATER REACTORS, dated 7/2/80.
b gol cc: Service Lists
~
Ci M
..