ML20002B706
Text
'., *_
i ENCLOSURE O'
NOV 0 0 S30 0
.IBUTION:
a Ce..ral File NRh Reading File MTSBReadingFile ETSB Subject File 141 1:0TE T0: Lake H. Barrett, Section Leader RLBangart Operating Reactors Assessment Branch, DOL-FRO 1:
Richard L. Bangart, Leader, Systems Analysis Section Effluent Treat. ant Systems Branch, DSI
SUBJECT:
STORAGE OF LLil AT OPERATING REACTORS We have reviewed the IE survey on LLW storage at operating reactors, tabulated the responses to questions 1 through 12, and have sumraarized scoe derived con-clusions. This tabulation and surraary are both enclosed. This input was prepared by V. !!alafeew.
crief.: ::. If --d I :
K:cL:i;.L ::: art Richard L. Bangart, Leader Systems Analysis Sectior Effluent Treatment Systr. s Branch Division of Syster.s Int ( ration
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
D. Eisenhut R. Purple '
W. Kreger G. Lainas
- 11. Gamill L. Rouse R. Cunningham l
T. Ippolito P. Grant V. Malafeew l
l l
pr#0 l
l DSI:RP:ETSB D5I:RP:ETSB VMalafeew:do RLBangart 11/06/80 11/
/80
l j
LLW STORAGE SURVEY CONCLUSIONS Of the 51 facilities surveyed:
a.
19 (or 37%) have expanded the low-level waste storage facilities beyor.d that described in the FSAR.
b.
35 (or 71%) are planning or considering increasing their waste storage capa-city.
14 of these have already expanded it once (see item a above).
c.
27 (or 53%) feel that their current solid waste processing equipment can meet the January 1981 burial criteria (regarding water content only).
of the remaining 24, 14 (or 58%) plan to go with mobile solid systems.
d.
23 (or 55%) use or are considering using cement as a binding agent.
12 (or 24%) use or are considering using 00W as a binding agent.
8 (or 16%) use or are considering using UF as a binding agent.
i e.
23 (or 55%) feel that the waste presently in storage will meet the January 1931 burial criteria.
(Note that 5 facilities did not have any waste 3
presently in storage.)
i f.
37 (or 72%) are considering or planning to install volume reduction equipment, although 10 of these are looking only at compactors.
g.
No storage facility with capacity in excess of 5 years of waste generation is 1
planned. All but two new storage facilities will be located inside the security fence.
Only two plants will request prior NRC approval for the new storage facility; others believe their.50.59 review will conclude no prior NRC approval is necessary.
1 4
e o
e 4
4 v.
~,
,,+,-p.
--ea v.e
+
.sev y-.,:,,,
,,.e-w.,-.m,,,
..,wm-,
,+
g,
--g w-,
g-.,
,,,w e
--.g.
g34
,, + - -,
SUMMARY
OF RESPONSES TC QUESTIONS No. 1 No. 2 ho. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 Present Capability What binder will Does waste in of mtg 1/81 Expanded Criteria of 0.5%
If No to No. 3, be used; UF, storage meet past FSAR
% full free H2O or How do you plan cement, Dow, 1/81 burial Yes or No now 1 gal /contain, to meet?
asphalt?
criteria?
Arkansas No 75 flo Mobile Cement No*, Yes Beaver' Valley Yes 25 Yes flA Cement Yes Big Rock Point No 65 Yes NA 7
Yes Browns Ferry Yes 70 Yes NA NA Yes Brunswick Yes*
0 No Mobile
?
Yes Calhoun No 20 Yes flA Cement Yes Calvert Cliffs No NA No*
7 Cement ?
NA Conn Yankee No 20 Yes*?
Mobile Cement, Dow?
Yes*?
Cooper No 0
Yes NA Cement Yes Crystal River No 75 No Mobile Cement No Davis-Besse Yes*
70 Yes flA UF Yes D. C. Cook Yes 25 Yes flA Cement No Diablo Canyon No 0
Yes flA Cement NA Dresden Yes 10 Yes flA Cement, Dow Yes Duane Arnold No 75 Yes flA*
7 Yes Farley No 0
No Mobile UF, Cement NA Fitzpartick No 75 No New System Cement, Dow flo Ft. St. Vrain No*
55*
Yes NA NA Yes Ginna Yes*
0 No
?
Cement, 7 No*
Hatch No 0
Yes NA Cement Yes Humboldt Bay No 80 No Mobile
? Dow No Indian Point 2 Yes*
Yes*?
Mobile UF NA Indian Point 3 No 50 Yes*
tlA UF Yes Kewaunee No 50 Yes flA Cement Yes LACBWR Yes*
20 Yes Mobile /Dow Dow ?
Yes
- More information on form
? - Under study NA - Not applicable v
=
No. 7 No. 8 No. 9a No. 9b No. 9c No.~9d If not, how do Any future plans Location they plan on for increasing Type of disposing?
waste storage Size Type waste stored Facility Facility Yes
?
?
?
?
3 NA.
Yes 3100 ft all Concrete new, inside fence NA No ?
NA NA NA NA NA Yes
?
dry, dew.res.
Concrete new, outside fence 3
NA Yes 85,000 ft all frame new, outside fence NA Yes
?
all Concrete new, inside fence 3
NA Yes 13,000 ft dry, dew.res.
Concrete new, inside fence NA Yes 1100 ft3 dew.res., sol.res.
Concrete new, inside fence NA No NA NA NA NA Ship Yes
?
all
?
?
3 NA
?*
50,000 ft dry, sol.res., sol.evap.bott.
?
new, outside fence Ship No NA NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA NA Yes
?
?
?
?
NA Yes 7
all
?
?
3 Ship Yes 100,000 ft dry, sol.res., sol.evap.bott.
Concrete new, inside fence NA No NA NA NA NA Ship
?
NA NA NA NA 3
NA Yes 40,000 ft dry Metal Frame new, inside fence Reprocess
?
NA NA NA NA NA Yes*
?
?
?
?
NA Yes 5 yr. accum.
dry, dew.res., sol.res.
Conc / steel new, inside fence NA No NA NA NA NA NA Yes*
?
all Concrete ext. of exist bldg.
5 i
No. 9e No. 9f No. 10 No. 11 No. 12 If yes Any, Plans What type?
Licensee for incinerator Schedule Review Volume compactor
.for Vol.
Process Schedule Reduction asphalt Reduction
?
?
Yes.
? Inc.
?
?
Yes Comp.
?
NA NA No NA NA 50.59
?
Yes Inc.
'1985 50.59 09/80-01/81
?
?
1985 50.59 05/81-10/81 No NA NA
?
~01/81-03/81
?
NA NA 50.59 02/81-08/81 No NA NA NA NA No NA NA
?
?
Yes
?
?
?
?
No NA NA NA NA No NA-NA NA NA Yes Canp./Inc.
NA NA NA No NA NA
?
?
Yes
?
?
?
?
Yes. Asp / Fluid Bed Dryer 1984
?
81-82 No?
NA NA NA NA Yes Comp.
1982 NA NA Yes Comp.
?
50.59 01/81-05/81 Yes Comp.
1980 NA NA.
No?
Comp.-
NA 7
'?
?
?
?
50.59 by 82 No.
NA NA NA NA No
'NA-ilA 50.59
- 81 No NA NA
- -- w
~
SUMMARY
OF RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS No. I flo. 2 tio. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 Present Capability of mtg 1/81 What binder will Does waste in Expanded Criteria of 0.5%
If No to No. 3, be used; UF, storage meet i
past FSAR
% full free H2O or How do you plan cement, Dow, 1/81 burial Yes or No now 1 gal /contain.
to meet?
asphalt?
criteria?
Maine Yankee Yes 70
.?
Mobile UF
?
McGuire No 0
Yes NA Dow Yes Millstone Yes 20 No New System Dou Yes Monticello Yes*
10 No*
Mobile
?
Yes Nine Mile Point No 75 No New System Dow No N. Anna No 100 No Mobile Cement No Oconee Yes 0
No Modification UF No Oyster Creek No 50
?
Modify UF/Dow?
?
Palisades Yes 25 Yes NA Asphalt No*
Peach Bottom No 90
?
New System Cement
?
Pilgrim
-No 40 Yes NA Cement ?
No Point Beach Yes 0
Yes NA Cement Yes Prairie Island No*
15 Yes ?
Mobile Cement NA ?
Quad Cities Yes 50 Yes NA Cement Yes Rancho Seco No 30 Yes NA UF Yes Robinson No 20 Yes NA Cement Yes Salem No 0
Yes ?
Modify Cement No San Onofre No 20 No*
Mobile Dow Yes Sequoyah Yes 0
Yes NA UF Yes St. Lucie No 10 Yes NA None Yes Surry No 0
No Mobile Cement NA Trojan Yes 20 No
?
Dow Yes Turkey Pt.
Yes 15 Yes NA Cement Yes Vermont Yankee No 25 Yes NA 7 Dow/ Cement Yes* ?
Yankee Rowe No 15*
Yes Modification ?
Cement Yes Zion x Yes*
O Yes*
NA Cement-Yes
- More information on form
? - Under. study NA - Not applicable i
N 3. 7 No. 8 No. 9a No. 9b No. 9c No. 9d If not, how do Any future plans Location they plan on for increasing Type of disposing?
waste storage Size Type waste stored Facility Facility Yes 1 yr. accum, all Conc / bunker new, inside fence N3 plans '
Yes 3
NA i
dew.res., sol.res.
Concrete new, inside fence 105,000 ft dew.res., sol.res., sol.evap.bott. Concrete new, new fence NA Yes
?
I I
i NA yes*
3 R:: process Yes 90,000 ft dry, sol.res., sol.evap.bott.
Concrete new, inside fence 3
50,000 ft all Concrete new, inside fence R; proc;ss/ Ship yes
?
all
?
?
R: process yes NA NA NA f1A 7
7 y
100,000 ft all frame new, outside fence Ship /R process Yes*
2 yrs. accum.
sol.res.
Conc / frame new, inside fence Reprocess yes Rp cess NA NA NA flA NA NA NA NA NA ?
No NA NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA NA es
?
dry frame (open, pad) new, inside fence NA Yes 3
20,000 ft evap.bott.
Concrete new, inside fence R: process Yes 1000 drms&50 LSA bxs all Concrete new, inside fence NA Yes I
I I
I NA Yes 3
90,000 ft all Concrete new, inside fence NA Yes 3
120,000 ft dry Butler bldg.
new, inside fence
- S 3
100,000 ft dry frame new, outside fence t
o NA flA NA NA S
3 20,000 ft dry frame new bldg.
f No NA NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA "U*
NA NA f4A flA
No. 9e No. 9f No. 10 No. 11 No. 12 If yes Any Plans What type?
Licensee for incinerator Schedule Review Volume compactor for Vol.
Process.
Schedule Reduction asphalt Reduction 50.59 7
?
Inc.
NA lic. amend.
08/80-04/81 Yes
?
.?
50.59
?
?
NA
?
?
Yes
?
?
50.59 05/80-03/82 Yes Inc/Evap.
?
?
?
Yes Inc.
?
?
?
?
?
?
NA NA No NA
?
?.
Yes Asphalt 1981 50.59 03/81-06/81 Yes Asphalt 1983 NA NA Yes Comp.
?
NA NA
?
NA NA NA NA No NA NA NA NA 7
Asphalt NA
?
?
Yes*
Comp.
1981 7
06/81-09/81 Yes Comp /Evap.
1981 50.59 81-82 Yes Inc.
?
?
?
Yes Comp.
1980
~
lic. amend.
03/80-12/80 Yes Comp.
NA
?
12/80-03/81 Yes Comp.
1981 50.59-08/80-11/80 Yes Inc/ Comp.
NA NA NA No NA NA
?
01/81-06/81 No NA NA NA NA Yes*?
Inc.
1982 NA NA Yes*
Inc.(exist.)
NA NA NA Yes Osmosis /Evap.
1982
.