ML19350B694

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Review of Fsar,Chapter 14, Initial Test Program. Incorporating Resolution of Questions & NRC Positions Will Reduce NRC Review Time
ML19350B694
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 03/16/1981
From: Tedesco R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Tallman W
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
NUDOCS 8103230356
Download: ML19350B694 (3)


Text

.

4.

4 5

5 f

5 5

MAR 1 6 1981 eiim LB#1 Rdg BClayton ef

.V "Ne DEisenhut

/[f fff W BJYoungblood bcc: TERA k(ig' L u diRushbrook h y ADromerick NRC/PDR

/5 l@

L/PDR Docket Nos.:

d 081 u.

g 7

cod lfd @ % r Murley ACRS (16) and 444

\\

g Dross f tr. William C. Tallman RHartfield, MPA VNoonan Chaiman and Chief Executive Officer OELD Public Service Company of New Hampshire 01E (3) 1000 Elm Street fianchester, New Hampshire 03105

Dear Hr. Tallman:

Subject:

Review of FSAR Chapter 14 " Initial Test Program" - Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2 We believe that it is important for us to complete our review and evaluation of FSAR Chapter 14, " Initial Test Program", as early as possible so that this review does not impact your licensing schedule. The changes to your test program or test procedures resulting from our review could impact your license schedule if this action is required at a date near your proposed fuel load date, and if the changes require that you (1) increase your staf-fing for the initial test program, (2) modify and rerun preoperational test procedures which may have already been completed, or (3) rrodify startup test procedures. This is because increases in staffing nomally require some lead time, preoperational test procedures must be written and perfomed prior to fuel loading, and startup test procedures must be written and ap-proved by the plant operating review cormaittee 60 days prior to fuel loading.

l Based upon recent reviews of the initial test programs of OL applications, j

we have concluded that our review time could be significantly reduced if the l

applicants would have addressed and accounted for staff infomation requests j

on previous applications. All of our recent reviews have contained questions and positions identical or similar to those which had to be resolved during previous reviews (e.g., Summer Nuclear Station).

If the applicants had resolved all of these staff questions and positions in their original FSAR Chapter 14 submittal, we estimate the Chapter 14 review process could have been shortened by 2 - 6 months.

As an applicant for an operating license, we believe you should consider the i

questions and staff positions on Chapter 14 sent to other recent applicants.

Incorporating the resolution of these items into your initial FSAR will reduce NRC review time and should ensure that the review of your initial test program description will not impact your schedule for fuel load or startup.

1 I

CmCE h s m ey TIDE 23 O[yg em we *ew re oc ewcv c:ao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

" " " - =

~

h No reply to this letter is required. However, the appropriate information should be submitted in your Final Safety Analysis Report.

If you have any questions regarding our previous questions and positions regarding Chapter 14, please contact Brent Clayton (301)492-4962.

Sincerely, original signed by Robert L Tedeces Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing r

s.

-w (Mi\\,

o,..c,p DL:LB#1,,

DLR B W g g*-

'4\\ ^ j.

lDQ:D7L l

RTedesdo'

'l '

'""'"* 0pToderick/ypdYobn@lood -

Y"

. e.rz y 3(j)/81

.,3,(,h8 },

3h(/81,

."f..

ac.co.. n ac,m.

u u w CFFICIAL RECORO COPY

nistiam C. Tallman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Public Service Company of New Hampshire 100 Elm Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 CCs*

John A. Ritscher, Esq.

Ropes and Gray E. Tupper Kinder Esq.

225 Franklin Street Assistant Attorney General Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Office of Attorney General 208 State House Annex Ralph H. Wood, Esq.

Concord, New Hampshire 03301 General Counsel Samuel Chilk Public Service Company of New Hampshire Secretary of the Commission 1000 Elm Street U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 Washington, D. C.

20555 Mr. John Haseltine, Project Manager Alan S. Rosenthal, Esc,.

Yankee Atomic Electric Company 20 Turnpike Road Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Westboro, Massachusetts 01581 Washington, D. C.

20555 Mr. Bruce B. Beckley, Project Manager Dr. John J. Buck Public Service Company of New Hampshire Atomic Safety and Licensing Apneai Board 1000 Elm Street U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmission Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 Washington, D. C.

20555 Ms. Elizabeth H. Weinhold 3 Godfrey Avenue Michael C. Farrar, Esq.

Hampton, New Hampshire 03842 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Robert A. Backus, Esq.

O't.eill, Backus, and Spielman Ivan W. Smith, Eso.

116 Lowell Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Norman Ross, Esq.

30 Francis Street Dr. Ernest Salo, Professor Brookline, Massachusetts 02146 Fisheries Research Institute - WH-10 College of Fisheries

~

Karin P. Sheldon, Esq.

- University of Washington Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss.

1725 I Street, N. W.

Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington, D. C. 20006 Mr. Arnie Winht Laurie Burt, Esq.

New Hampshire House of Representatives Office of the Assistant Attorney General Science. Technology and Energy Comittee State House Environmental Protection Division Concord, New Hamoshire 03301 One Ashburton Place Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Resident Inspector Seabrook Nuclear Power Station D. Pierre G. Cameron, Jr., Esq.

c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission General. Counsel P. O. Box 1149 Public Service Company of New Hampshire Seabrook, New Hamoshire -03874 1000 Elm Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 a

e 1

-n

,