ML19347F198
| ML19347F198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 03/10/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347F185 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-81-04, 50-366-81-4, NUDOCS 8105150445 | |
| Download: ML19347F198 (1) | |
Text
s y,
~
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Georgia Power Company Docket No. 50-366 Hatch 2 License No. NPF-5 As a result of the ihspection conducted on January 10 - February 20, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following violations were identified.
A.
Technical Specification 3.5. 3._1.b.2 r. equi res that in condition a, two independent Core Spray System subsystems shall be operable taking suction from the condensate storage tank when the suppression pool is drained.
Contrary to the 'above, the operability'of the core spray system was not met in that on January 26, 1981, the manual injection isolation valves for both subsystems were inadvertantly shut for approximately 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.O.2.).
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.2 requires that written procedures be reviewed by the Plant Review Board (PRB) and approved by the Plant Manager.
- Contrary to the above, adequate review and approval requirements were not met in that the PRB reviewed and the Plant Manager approved an inservice inspection hydro procedure (HNP-2-1230) on January 9, 1981, which, resulted in violation of technical specification ~3.5.3.1.b.2 when implemented.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement'I.D.2.).
Pursuant to the provisions of IQ CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) ccrrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Date:
l ggr3 gg 3 gg ja -
g
d'pn LE:q o UNITED STATES 8Y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
o E
REGION 11 e
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.. SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, G EoRGIA 30303 o
Report Nos. 50-321/81-04 and 50-366/81-04 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspet. tion at Hatch ne Baxley, Georgia Inspector:
J
/
R. F. RBgers
[
Date Signed Approved by:
P. Kellogg, Section Chief, Reactor Project 28 Date Signed
SUMMARY
Inspection on January 10, - February 20, 1981-Areas Inspected This inspection involved 108 inspector-hours on site in 'the areas of technical specification compl'iance, reportable occurrences, housekeeping, operator per-formance, overall. plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities and surveillance-activities.
Results Of the eleven areas inspected, no apparent violations or jeviations were identi-fied in ten areas, two violations were identified in one area (inoperability of the core spray system paragraph 5).
gyp.=L3 Q'*~",9;5g
- ysyy zgyg; s3 5.
[f.
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously lj l
entered into system under:
D 3j//d ( W q
ANO N o. of pages:
/O gj m'
,c.
.