ML19347F013
| ML19347F013 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/31/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347F009 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-10-78-580, FOIA-81-13 NUDOCS 8105150076 | |
| Download: ML19347F013 (35) | |
Text
C' O
United States
( 'i
(.g(Lgf s Nuclear Regufatory Commission
.g j
Report to the Commission Review of Contract NRC-10-78-580 Awarded to TERA Advanced Services Corporation for the Implementation and Operation of the Document Control System 5
e-I Office of Inspector and Auditor 3
March 1981 i
I NOTICE This in An Internal Manacement Document Prepared For The Commission Not to Be Released Outside Of NRC DD 18105150 j
a M:e
[s
'o, UNITED STATES 3'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
{,
.,1 WASHWGTON, D. C. 20555
\\...+,/
ttarch 9, 1981
+
f1Et10?ANDutt FOR:
Chainnan Hendrie Connissioner Gilinsky Comnissioner Bradford Commissioner Ahearne g)
FROM:
James J. Cummings, of rector
/
g,ygww T/
v Office of Inspector and Auditor M
l (URJECT:
l REVIEW 0F CONTRACT NRC-10-78-580 " RDED MTERA ADVANCED SERVICES CORPORATI0tl FOR THE IttPLEMEN AtID OPERATI0tl 0F THE DOCUllENT CONTROL SYSTEft, Enclosed is our audit report resulting from a review of contract NRC 78-580 awarded to TERA Advanced Services Corporation (TASC) for the Division of Technical Infomation and Document Controlimplem The Adninistration, is the flRC office that has prime respons(TIDC), Office of ibility for the of the DCS contract with TASC. development, adninistration and canage The con' tract with TASC was awarded on June 3,1978, at an initial cost of $9,927,063 to cover the first two years of perfomance.
the cost to $12,778,764.first two years, seven nodifications were made to During these operation at a cost of $10,971,604itodi/ication #8 provided for the third year of value to $23,750,368.
and increased the total contract approximate $16,000,000. Total payments nade on the contract to date The purpose of our audit was to detemine whether NPC administered this contract in accordance with its terms and in an efficient and effective nann,er.the Federal Procurement Regulations, Also, we evaluated the DCS to determine whether it was fully operational, whether pe The audit was conducted from February through November 1980, prinarily at flRC Headquarters,'with some audit assistance from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) at Oakland, California.
CONTACTS: A. Gauthier, OIA W. Glenn, AIA 49-27051 l
I
'j i
f l
GLOSSAPY Automatic Data Processing (ADP) - data processing perfomed largely by a machine, without intervention by a hunan operator.
Boolean Search Technique - A block-search nothodology that uses a key phrase of " subject-heading" type language.
Subject terns or phrases within each block are controlled and can be combined across blocks.in a standard Boolean (algebraic relationship) logic to achieve cross-reference and cross-correlation capability.
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (C0TR) - a qualified snployee delegate < to perfom specific contract administration functions (such as inspection and acceptance of contract deliverables) which are the responsibility of the contracting officer.
Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) Contract - is a cost-reinbursement contract in which the Government agrees to reinburse the contractor for all allowable costs which may be incurred in contract perfomance.
In addition, the Government agrees to pay the contractor a fixed fee of a specified number of dollars above cost for doing the work.
Cathode-ray Tube (CRT) Teminal - provides visual output from a computer in the fom of alphanumeric and graphic displays.
Direct Costs - are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular project or activity.
Fee - a charge for a professional service.
Fim-Fixed-Price (FFP) Contract - is a contract to pay a specified price when the itens or services called for in the contract have been delivered and accepted by the Government.
General & Administrative (G8A) Expenses - any management, financial and other expense which is incurred by or allocated to a business unit and which is for the general management and administration of the business unit as a whole.
Hierarchical Search Technique - Uses a multi-level structure to uniquely categorize documents in all current and anticipated subject cate-gories.
The entry for a search must be initiated with the broadest code and then refine the search by the addition of codes for succeeding, more precise levels.
4 Indirect Costs - are those costs that have been incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore, cannot be identified specifically with a particular project or activity.
l I
11 I
-i Labor Additive Rate - Costs such as vacations, payroll taxes, health insurance deferred compensation and unployee incentive which are reflected on a percentage of direct labor.
The rate provides for the recoupnent of fringe benefits paid, but not charged directly to any project.
Loaded Labor Rate - Composite rate which includes a base labor cost factored by a labor additive rate, an overhead rate, a GSA rate and a profit rate.
In some cases it also includes a labor escalation factor.
The rate provides for the recoupment of indirect costs not charged to a particular product or activity.
Overhead Costs - business expenses not chargeable to a particular part of the w rk or product. Also, costs that are not readily identifiable to a particular activity or product.
Profit - the compensation accruing to entrepreneurs for the assumption of risk in business enterprise as distinguished from wages or rent.
Prorate - to divide, distribute or assess proportionately.
Tine & Naterials (T&M) Contract - is a contract which provides for the procurement of property or services on the basis of:
- 1) direct labor at specified fixed hourly rates, and 2) material at cost.
i i
I I
l 4
s RACKGROUtID The Document Control System (DCS) is a remote access system which allows multiple users throughout the agency to simultaneously search, locate and examine documents centrally stored in microfiche fann. Cathode-ray Tube (CRT) teminals are located in various fiRC' offices.
The CRT teminals are used to enter data needed to search for documents which have been stored within the computer system. There are two types of CRT teminals used for the DCS--digital (28) and video (12). !!ost of the agency has digital teminals which allow a user to obtain pertinent data (subject, author, recipient, etc.) about a document.
To view the document, a person must use the nicrofiche location infomation to pull the appropriate microfiche stored in a tub file.
By placing the microfiche in a reader-printer, the user is able to view the document page by page.
If the person desires a copy of a page, the reader-printer can reproduce the page from the microfiche. The Phillips Building contains the agency's 12 video CRT teminals.
There teminals allow a user to request documents stored in the syste.t. Unlike the digital teminals, the user can actually view the docunent on this teminal since a picture of the microfiche image of the document is captured within its system.
The user can scan the document page by page.
If a copy of a page is desired, the user can copy the image by utilizing a printer attached to the video teminal.
Viewing documents either on the video CRT tenninal or the reader-printer is dependent upon the ability of the contractor to:
(1) correctly enter documents into the DCS; and (2) microfiche the documents in a timely manner. The other controlling feature is the familiarity of the user in trying to use the DCS.
The Division of Technical Infomation and Document Control (TIDC) has the prime responsibility for the development, administration and management of the DCS.
The operation of the DCS is perfomed in Bethesda, Maryland, with development work being perfomed in both Bethesda, liaryland, and the contractor's facilities in Berkeley, Cali fornia.
Need for Document itanagement in flRC In October 1975, the Executive Director for Operations (EDO) appointed a Task Force to examine flRC's document management procedures. The Task Force found that:
Retrieval of infomation developed by NRC, its contractors and licensees takes too long and requires the expenditure l
of too much time of professional staff.
There is no sure or systematic means of locating all available documents relating to problems being evaluated by the staff or for use in responding to public inquiries.
As a result of the Task Force's findings, the EDO reconnended an action plan to Chaiman Anders on January 30, 1976.
One of the proposed tasks involved a detemination of which f!RC action documents should be filed.
Another of the tasks included the need to " develop an appropriate I
,e 2
evaluation and indexing systen for flRC documents that could be used
[
presently throughout flRC, so that a central computer locator system could be anployed." On February 12, 1976, Chaiman Anders authorized the EDO to proceed with the action plan and requested that the effort be concentrated on:
(1) planning an flRC-wide policy, and (2) dissemination problems. An Infomation Report, SECY-76-433, prepared as a result of I
the action plan study, was issued on August 18, 1976.
The Infomation Report contained a plan to implement an automated nicrofiche storage and retrieval system.
The system was to be comprised of "off-the-shelf" hardware and sof tware and was to " provide for simultaneous access to both index and docunents by nultiple users at remote CRT teminals."
The plan specifically stated that "all equipment for the system will be off-the-shelf and no research and development will be involved." The plan also included a need to assure that the system was meeting flPC i
l requirements and was cost effective.
Therefore, decision points were to be established at the seventh month and the first and second years.
The estinated costs for the proposed system was $9.2 million which included purchase and installation of user teminals. At that time the estinated annual contract or operating cost of the system was $3 million.
The I
report also contained key tasks which were included in a statement of work to be provided to prospective contractors.
Pre-Contract Award The Division of Contracts (DC) issued a notice to the Commerce Business Daily in January 1977 outlining f1RC's objectives for a DCS and soliciting prospective bidders to ask for the Request for Proposal (RFP RS-77-26).
The RFP was issued on April 15,1977, to 92 prospective offerors.
There were only three proposals subnitted to flRC. After examination of the proposals, TERA Advanced Services Corporation (TASC) was reconnended for the contract award by the Source Evaluation Board.
The Office of Administration (ADM), in Comnissioner Action paper SECY-78-67, requested
^5at the Commission approve the intent to enter into a two-year contract with TASC. Prior to the approval of the contract award, the Commission requested that the flRC address certain questions relating to the specifications and costs for the proposed system.
In addition to these items, the ADM l
was requested to provide the following infomation:
I, an analysis of the potential conflict of interest implications; cunments from the appropriate line offices [in particular, fluclear Reactor Regulation (f1RR)] on the applicability of the proposed system to their operations; additional justification for the statement that the staff currently spends 20 percent of its time searching for documents; and results of a survey of other regulatory agencies with respect to their experiences in inplementing docunent control systems.
i
)
1 i
I
w_-
,I 3
Contract Award The ADM provided the requested infomation in SECY-78-67A, dated April 6, 1978. Based on this infomation the Commission, with one dissenting vote, concurred in the execution of the proposed contract with TASC.
The Commissioners directed that a thorough evaluation of the DCS be perfomed at the end of Phase I.
This evaluation was required to allow flRC to explore alternative courses of action and to evaluate the progress of performance.
Infomation Report SECY-78-678 provided the Commission with the steps which would be used to evaluate the contractor's perform-ance and recommended future courses of action for the implementation of the DCS.
Infomation Report, SECY-79-649, issued December 10, 1979, provided the Commission with more infomation which the Secretary requested from the E50 in a memorandum dated June 1,1978. However, since the administrative portion
- of the DCS was the only portion which had been functional long enough, the ADM limited its comments to this area.
Dollar savings supposedly were incurred in the administrative and manpower areas.
There were also comments relating to the acceptability of the DCS and the manner in which the contractor met his deliverable schedule. One of the prime accomplishments pointed out in the JECY paper was the ability of the DCS to provide necessary support to the Three fille Island (TMI)
Task Force.
Contract Pricing and Exercise of Option Af ter the negotiations for the initial contract period (June 3,1978, to June 2,1980), f4RC negotiators awarded a contract composed of a tri-pricing arrangement. One arrangement was for a time and materials (T&M) section which was to include labor costs for the development, imple-mentation, and operation of the DCS. This section was to account for the time required to develop the DCS and to input required data from a document into the DCS.
The second arrangement was for a fixed prien lease section which was used to account for the lease payments for the hardware associated with the DCS. The charges included the integration, installation and maintenance of the hardware, fiRC had the option to buy the hardware at a reduced cost after the 20th payment was made. The 1
third arrangement was for a cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) section which
)
provided for re'mbursement of costs for supplies, equipment, rent, and other items needed for the operation of the DCS facility.
Because of the pricing arrangement, the DCS contract practically operates as three contracts in one.
Each of these contract arrangements requires a different level of monitorship.
The time and material portion requires the l
- The administrative portion of the DCS included the Daily Accession List, Title of Documents Made Pulelicly Available, Distribution Sheets for Incoming Docket 50-related Documents, etc.
4 highest level of monitorship, especially since it is the least preferred method of contracting, whereas, the fixed price portion of the contract requires the lowest level of monitorship.
This tri-pricing arrangement remains in Year 3 of the contract.
In December 1979, the ADM notified the Commission in SECY-79-649, that NRC intended "to exercise its option for the first of the two one-year extensions that were negotiated with the initial contract.
This will assure continuity of service and provide for the excellence that the staff requires and that the contractor has demonstrated." At the same time, the contractor was notified that NRC intended to exercise the option to continue the contract into Year 3. TASC submitted its cost proposal for Year 3, and on May 28, 1980, negotiations were completed with the contractor by the DC and TIDC. On llay 19, 1980, the ADM issued SECY-80-255 asking the Commission to approve the execution of a contract modification for Year 3 of the contract.
The Commission approved the modification to the contract; however, the ED0 was again requested to provide additional infomation about the contract and the DCS.
The Commission requested the following:
1.
The EDO should examine the scope of the work to ensure that all tasks are essential (all urnecessary tasks should be elimi-nated) and to ensure that all possible cost-saving modifi-cations were achieved.
2.
The ED0 should either propose a long-tem plan for transferring the work to NRC or explain why it is necessary and legal to retain a contractor to perfonn the work.
The latter SECY paper also indicated that "the statement of work (50W) has been nodified from the original only to the extent that the develop-mental pcrtions have been deleted since the system is up and operational."
This SECY paper not withstanding, the contract modification was issued at an estimated cost of $10.97 million, which included development work for the subject index sof tware.
Attachment I contains the full text of the Commission's concerns. Also, the Office of flanagement and Program Analysis (0MPA), as representative for the EDO, completed their study of the DCS to answer the Commission concerns and a report was issued by the EDO to the Chainnan on November 18, 1980.
Contract Cost and Cost Growth The total cumulative estimated cost for the three year effort is $23.75 million. Attachment 2 provides the impact that each contract modifi-cation has had on the initial cost of the contract.
In the initial stages of pursuing a need for a DCS, the costs for the first two years were estinated at $9.2 million with a $3.0 million estimate to operate the DCS annually.
However, circumstances changed and NRC was not able to supply the facility (building to house the DCS operations) for the
5 contractor. Also, a decision was made that the lease costs of the Auto-matic Data Processing (ADP) equipment would he calculated with an option to buy.
In addition, according to the docunientation within TIDC, the contractor was progressing ahead of schedule thereby increasing costs.
The THI incident created a need to have THI-related documents input into the system expeditiously and therefore, required a second shift. flRR also levied a demand on TIDC to backfit documents relating to old reactor plants.
Because of the influx of more documents into the DCS, there was a need for more equipment (tenninals) throughout the agency in order to allow wider use of the DCS. Almost all of the cost increases have resulted from the need for more labor. Additionally, the development of a subject index for use in the " Boolean" search technique for documents has escalated the cost of the DCS.
SCOPE This review was conducted from February through flovember 1980 primarily Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) quested audit assistance from the Defense at f1RC Headquarters. OIA re at Oakland, California, and received the results of their audit on January 23, 1981.
The purpose of our review was to determine whether f1RC administered the TASC contract in accordance with its tenns, the Federal Procurement Regulations, and in an efficient and effective manner. Also, we wanted to evaluate the DCS to determine whether it was fully operational, whether personnel were using it to the optimum, and whether there were any areas warranting improvement.
Our review included:
discussions with responsible individuals in TIDC, DC, and Automatic Data Processing Support (ADPS);
examination of pertinent data in the TIDC and DC files; interviews with selected persons in the five program offices; physical inspection of tenninals in the NRC Headquarters; discussions with DCAA personnel; f
evaluation of DCAA audit reports; i
evaluations of the Summary of flegotiations for the DCS contract; and observations of the TASC operation.
~
..p V 9
?, '.
- I*,
- UNITED STATES t
g" *
([ j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO.i
/ J: E W ASHIN GTON, D.C. 20555 e
- g *.h 4
June ll, 1980 DFFsCE OF THf.
SECRETARY h p MEMORANDUM FOR:
Will'ia J. Dircks Acting Executive Director for Ope ions FROM:
Samuel J. Chilk, Secreta /
SUBJECT:
SECY-80-255 - CONTRACT fid) TE-10-78-580, fiRC DOCUMENT C0?iTROL SYSTEM (COMMISSI0tlE)/ ACTION ITEM)
This is to advise you that the Commission (with four Comissioners approving) has granted approval for the Contracting Officer to enter into a contract modification for the exercise of the Year 3 option, subject to the following conditions:
1.
The EDO should examine the scope of the work to ensure that all tasks are essential (all unnecessary tasks should be eliminated) and to ensure that all possible cost saving modifications are achieved.
2.
The EDO should either propose a long-tenn plan for transfe: ring the work to NRC or explain why it is necessary and legal to retain a contractor to perfonn the work..
Commissioner Gilinsky agrees with the majority that the EDO should review this contract effort. along the lines mentioned above.
However, he disapproved the staff's recommendation and provided the following coments:
"As far as I can tell, this system is not being used.
Before I approve any further expenditures, I would like to see proof that the system is being used in a way which justifies its expense.
In addition, I would like the EDO to study the system and,make recommenda-tions to the Coxnission regarding the least expensive document control system which w~ill satisfy NRC's needs. The ED0's report should indicate what types of system can be' obtained, their benefits and drawbacks, and their cost.
In this connection, it would be useful to know what types of document control systems are employed by other Federal agencies, such as NASA, NSA, CIA, and their cost.
- Finally, I think we should determine how NRC will assume control of ths document control system at the expiration of this contract.'.'
It is requested that the EDO:
1.
Monitor the negotiation of this contract based on the Commission guidance outlined above.
2.
Provide a response to Commissioner Gilinsky's comment concerning use of the system and request for an EDO study by c.o.b. June 30, 1980.
CONTACT:
l EWMcGreoor(SECY) 4-1410 l
l Attachment I l
,s
1
(
,... j l
The Of.fice of the Executive Director for Operations was informed of this action by telephone on June 10, 1953.
[
cc:
Chairman Ahearne Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Kenne'/
Commissioner Hendrie Commissioner Bradford Connission Staff Offices Director, Administration e
l 4 Nm-
Cost Catecortes Cost Plus Fixed Fee Section Air Travel Auto Expense Per Diem Supplies Facility Costs Rent Furnishings..and other Facility Costs Facility Operatino Costs _
Outside Services Recruiting Eq:sipment leased Equipment Maintenance Freight Telephone Supplies Postage Printing and Xerox Publications and Subscriptions Computer Usage Facility Insurance l
Relocation l
Note:
1.
Backup Support sent by TASC only reflected one supplies category.
l I
. c
.-.-.c
. _._ m -~
l 1
Schedule of TASC Air Travel
!!AME DATE ORIGill/DESTIt!ATION flRC COST 10/29/79
!! ash /Raleigh/ Wash 5 66.00 i
10/22/79 Uash/Ral eigh/l.'a sh 66.00 11/5/79
!! ash /Raleigh/1! ash 68.00 10/1/79 Wash /Raleigh/Nash 60.00 9/24/79 Ral/1!a sh/Ral/ Mash 115.00 12/7/79 Wash /Raleigh/L' ash 114.00 12/14/79 Wash /Raleigh/l? ash 68.00 11/1f/79 Wash /Raleigh/t.' ash 66.00 8/20/79 Sarasota/lfash/
Sarasota 258.00 3/21/80 Balt./Las Vegas /
San Trancisco 329.00 11/16/79 Wash /fiY/ Wash 109.00 SL319.00
l Schedule of Electrical Work Performed Under Outside Services Vendor Amount Description Steven Diehl
$ 60.00 install electrical outlet A. S. Johnson 38.53 install breakers Dynaelectric
$1.856. 65 pull computer cable and 51,955.18 install wiremold I
mi..i
.r
Schedt of Outside Services for TEHA's Berkeley Office _
CHARGED TO OTHER TYPE NRC TERA 0F VENDOR PROJECT PROJECTS SERVICE Words Unlimited
$ 135.00
.00 ADP Pestern Temporary Services 110.05
.00 TYPIST 39.05
.00 TYPIST 13.40 46.90 PBX OPERATOR 30.80 67.20 CLERK 100.80 230.40 TYPIST 30.15 127.36 PBX OPERATOR 46.86 456.32 TYPIST K A Perkins 45.50
.00 TYPIST Kelly Girl 179.56
.00 TYPIST 272.51
.00 TYPIST Western Temporary Services 46.80
.00 TYPIST 21.30
.00 TYPIST 83.43
.00 TYPIST 39.05
.00 TYPIST 51,194.26 l
l
Schedule of ADP/ Electrical Charges Under Facility & Furnishings Account Vendor Amount Description Dynalectric 162.42 Pull Computer Cable Dynalectric 430.52 Pull Computer Cable Dynalectric 69.07 Relocate Receptacle Dynalectric 2,667.70 Pull 24 Computer Cable Dynalectric 97.66 Electrical Installation S!rvici Dynalectric 182.07 Electrical Installation 53rvici Com-Site Inc.
9,070.80 Computer Room Expansion Com-Site Inc.
16,120.00 Computer Room Expansion Steven Diehl 240.00 Relocate Electrical Outlets Dynalectric 46.7E Relocate Power Poles Dynalectric 115.32 Install Circuit Dynalectric 326.06 Install 220 volts outlets Dynalectric 706.87 Pull Computer Cable Dynalectric 71.25 Relocate 7 Power Poles Marinways, Inc.
420.18 A/C work for computer Dynalectric 115.32 Relocate Power Poles Dyanlectric 323.31 Relocate Power Poles Dynalectric 114.83 Install Power Poles Computer Power System 10,190.57 Computer service Computer Power System 1,136.71 Output Monitor Kits Computer Power System 265.50 Cable Assemblies M. L. Councell Assoc.
2,752.85 Disc Packs M. L. Councell Assoc.
1,375.55 Disc Packs Terminal Data Corp.
1,500.00 "Special Shutter" M.L. Councell Assoc.
2,752.25 Disc Packs Terminal Data Corp.
1,122.90 Disc, Engineering Charts
$52,376.73
[
t-JW
'~
,'f Schedule of Furniture and Related Office Equipment Purchased Under Facility and Furnishings Accour.t Item Unit Price Total (Including tax) 6 Swivel Chairs S212.00
$ 1,335.60 2 88" Cabinets 362.23 724.46 6 Reel bars, 4 Shelves 582.70 4 Lateral Files 195.00 819.00 2 Tables 134.00 281.40 5 Desks 315.00 1,653.75 1 Lateral File 393.00 412.65 15 Stacking Chairs 46.74 736.17 6 Book Cases 195.00 1,228.50 3 Book Cases 103.00 324.45 7 Credenzas 203.00 1,492.05 1 Desk 315.00 330.75 1 88" Cabinet 362.23 362.23 3 Reel Bars, 2 Shelves 167.75 2 Storage Tables 2 Sorters 504.00 1,058.40 16 Vertical Dividers 1 Desk Sorter 264.00 277.20 10 Shelvr.s, 10 Light:
1,800.75 3 Panels 268.00 844.20 2 Panels 201.00 422.10 11 Panels 184.00 2,125.20 1 Panel 171.00 179.55 3 Panels 106.00 333.90 2 Acoustic Panels 298.00 625.80
$18,118.56
4 i
Schedule of Equipment Purchased Under i
Facility & Furnishings Account Quantity Item Unit Price Total 1
Mobile Scope 260.50 260.50 1
Oscilloscope 2,92a.25 2,924.25 1
Camera Equipment 86.95 86.95 1
A/C 10 Ton 21,014.07 21,014.07 1
Typewriter & Equipment 1,118.25 1,118.25 i
2 Fiche Readers 135.00 283.50 F
1 Fiche Reader 274.00 295.70 i
2 High Spd. Printers 1,466.64 2,933.28 2
High Spd. Printers 261.90 523.80 1
Process Camera 406.75 406.75 1
Tyoewriter & Equipment 981.75 981.75 1
Fiche Cutter 1,082.34 1,082.34 531,911.14 1
I l
l f
~~
Schedule of Charges for Coffee Service, Food and Beer Vendor Amount Description Cafe Coffee 147.59 Coffee Service 322.25 293.65 228.94*
209.98 226.55*
213.62 188.94 262.97 174.00 253.65 285.89 130.75*
179.17 454.00 Cafe Coffee 247.48 Coffee Service Sub Total
$_3_,_919. 43 Shakey's 29.91*
Food and Beer Leland Deli 2.68*
Food Leland Deli 17.84*
Food High's 15.73 Food Leland Deli 27.23 Food Leland Deli 27.61 Food Leland Delt 24.13 Food 19.68 22.03 20.79 12.59*
22.00*
23.81*
17.23*
13.17*
12.20 Leland Deli 16.64
?
9.97 Lele.4 Deli 19.77 Lelant. Deli 20.47 Leland 7eli 13.09 Food 388.57 otal
$4,308.00 l
- The support for these charges are shown in the next six (6) attachments for sample purposes.
I l
l 0
.I C'.' u C.:TLL $Lf.n:E s
- clyg i
nu c-s w C
canntew uSvexo msv ji (301) 258 4361
. ~.... -...
lr 3-II-90-n...a..
....... $.A/ 7~ /D f2/VS 22%A CMA w n usc._. M -sin, 8. ~1 b h y t y f_ p H D -
~.............. '.
- =='
- r..
~*r
.=~~"=
1 -* = h.=_ -L-O
. _.e.ac.roviSata~:c -
3jtLOAd I)l-Xfh) !.f
-.ll$00
~
g.3
- @@N
_3 J C (2.' W
... _ _fI'8 f
' N'2
_30p b o, lof%
._S~r$0
~
7)tr a 2.f d
/2C0-7 4
$125.07
@ui,1 poi,,
ou,.ucan 103.87
- . ~. '-T * *. *' ~W"-i :. >6
- *=.. "~. :.+: k. -
T :
.!~.-
$228.94 STATEMENT CUE COFFEE SERYMX 7939 Quecus Dnve
[7/7 causame wmue weo 8
(301) 2"JK'A1 P-
.'s....
p; -. -,
-..r. -: v. = v
+ _ - -- - -
< 2 S c l
A).:,
ic hw
/
~
T e Q. A C (.") Q.
I Q-n c. ~e ta tsc..
A.J.=.n'/4'm l
2 r-w s w il
~~
- ==
- I
_ j.'.
c ura 4.o suc.in.a 1
c...as s. Esm,sgry, L,.;.,
F.,,, _
PREWSOU' S ALANCE
"..a.y 31vdtW blt hs) l.f
_ S 00 300 6 c cues
(,4b v
y day 7m
(
/2.00 s
).fO l
'.$r b t
$~I'.
Kl Fe P00R ORBEl.
)2 s' C
n:.to y
ce s N.
rnr
.n
- 1 l/g],ph x
C~LLQfe,,
STATEMEh'7
)
STATEMENT CME CNE SGVICE 7939 (k,ma,orwe ptl. g g f 7 40lTEE SmVICE j
cannutuwa. uurstuo 20160 on ourm a orne psetFG_ usmLMO 20760 l l 6.
(301) 2*A 0361 (301) 2*A0361
]
F,..
.s_,.,_ j _
__a--.
~ ~ ~: ^ :-
... n :. g u,,,;.a x ;
ygyl g7 g
y f'1 NC~T oO bp y5 1\\~ O
~Zd72W 0*N' 9ts/
ts b $ c s 4 1s' # 6. W "
r 9.45 Ml' /
W'S C
/M
- 85
- 45 Bs7/n:.M, nik.
81.70 49.95
~...
.. L...
~=@C'
$$j1.,
.i -
..a.-.,..a
-.~g-
- r.. -...- -
~.-......~.
,new ous.au cc__
- 6. -> oar.%.:: #.. ump 4 cr urs u
'"Cous.au cc 90 0
- 3. P Q._.__{p m.
t at y c p e.~
s kf
- W Q.0 O N. V'f Sg$ bx S f*///7 em S
_n
_{ g 8/ A O -
hiL%,x q>%,(;f.
_png S
1*Atx
, /0 Ae. m.
7 V
v'.
b 6'll' DU,LICATC STATEMENT
~ ~
STATEMENT /
9 [, 7 CME COOT.E SmVK:E 7939 Oueerus Dr ve M MEE SE VICE GAJTHUt30tnG. MARYLNO 20760 7939 Chemw Orwe y/
ANER58 TAG. uAnytuo ;o760 (301)258 4361
-1> -1
.n.
fi_/ / -.= - - - 1. -.._..:_...-;-._.__.
N **b 5 l W*b5 A
h5 N
& Y $ &-
- .N
%z g c ogg-
__ l lY A C. cG. 9.
b 0
_ _3 I D I LAsQC.cas W ffrF'.-#ff90
.__d 6 w.
(YCh
~..................
-.. x -
j
-.g, r.. _.
...- ~.
_ i... 2 _
~..........
..c.,ou. a tTc l
Y'v-= e=.
...... J,. c..o=u.=..J _.cd=w I
..u cc g
I W
U-Y N'"
.oYhLY{C U
H. oo
??
S-T911 gjt.-itv7 s i~
'95
- 9. c o
- s 3
5 3 V. M A c orta e.
J 1
X
/,4 m[ ~
g} (, yf-g D- ~ I M A Sc1&
,7_.__3[
d'S 71m
- 6. O o
[
.N
-]'~
L D* 2
F, t
--9 STATEMENT j
CAFE COFFEE SERVICE
~ 5943 7939 Q seWir Drive NE G#dTHERSBURG. f.*D 20763 I
1301) 258 03G1 g
._....C_..S t
i 5
TPMS g
b n,OATE j
0 l
S-bo b,,$Y{b b
b i
r
%)
ww wsch t
d
- * ^
5 j
i e
~
pat LAst saLamCE g
psgast OttaCM ano attuan wives tous massitiamCE f
.., _ ATE A ND. DCSCRIPTION,
,)
CH ANGES, *d,, catEDriS,,,,
PREVIOUS DALANCE r
3--
kbMLP
/
/AS M
/
fas
./.cff.
Tad _._.P
.i j Ao.7f d
p,s_,
,o 40
%/
J L
DUPLICATE OiU
~,1". # *
, $.* s -
..?. ? ? --
, ' +.... ' '
, *,,. 4..w,*...
- W1c g
..f
- %**.s =
s l
- I
-[gE M
- .* ~.* L T
- J
[
.:.:.7..,.)....*
Ed_d yMf
.aq:w-
~ ~
-w@
--c e.t.:a.a: :...
-.,; n
- 7,. p..
1 P00R OllilNA1
~
~ 3 i,
?[
t SiOW.-
-YO U H
.. k t.
% 33f
&3W - -
O
, g,; q 9 7,z 3 f3 EG07.00-b7
~
?-
. P3 0 CD 7.00 l
^~
~
a }.
11 2201.07-t:C : ; 41 c3053
- a. cy22,47Tt; 29*9 I I
1 l 4
/
+. :
c........w. r.-
l
/
.-...a..
, e 6...s...
,. *g.*r* * - W"*** '
L
. r* * '.W t *:" 9.*.
- * *
1
.. d.... t
. g, ' g 1
g.-.
g w.w.
- u..4 w
-i.E NME p h $ d57 Ude*'..,n.
'.-. m..
'i x :: m
- t..t w
m.a m ; m s : w 4,
..m m. w -
r s.,
-- e n.wwn
- t J
4.
p nu-J,N.5,5.?.%m p A/. "
"t
<m s~ $ '..*..,<
I. v.-.--
l 13.' a=QDDa3f.-*. 'a m
..e.
. n.. w. -,.
u
+
. 3..*.
.- E' W t. p
.,_g..-...p'@.
3841
_.5,.
a.)
.j ig,"
F 2
-w.
r.ps.- - - - _ - -
r.
e. i.
" -....r:
1<
f Gw;;y??'@i? $
q' gy
.~.,.m n
',. &. &~~
.1 exJEsT%il2ti""'sc.t,? t. L Q y' Vs' S'
lT~.".
.. :... u...
... )
3 L[ ' 6* 3..S.R. c.7.11236 W
{. _w g3 Q
.g
. g f D 2'9 M. O * * ' '
'~J * *w. F.
s.
.e
.'. '. ~.. ' C,...r....
- 7.."t:. /
'c
- 'O.
o.
. t 09.004
- .J '.1976 F's.%M-l $ C0.70--A.
"~*** g- 'x c-?
r
-... s c1.u"o-s.
L,._
c.- <.sw 887 0
- i g !,d u # - M6m
+--
s 03.20-1 3
- Wa es T::,er.f
. m 2D
=-,
-w.~-.-
~
n.w--w. ~ r.
-. s c3.3y-s.
- Il n
.-.-..e.-
r
-a.:- n.s.nu
. gg tg.2pa.
~. 2.;. ;.e. -- n ~ ~,
~.
r n,.
.- l,$
C0.4Z-1 w h,<.:,t b.. Mr. ~:..-,
r
-e.
I
. "G.r*. Gnr%'
rv ye.nr.
- 4. ta s
ltDl
~~-
gw.. :.- ;1e. ', 3.0 4f511ips $ 5 2
~ - -
- ~ -
- ! 08.71Td-
...%kW 5 C#7.' -i;:. $$.h t,.J
&u. 'f.nu).
s:..
L
.&--.me...n{h....>,. f ' ~ ~--Q.
.- 7..a. 4 ;~~
~.
..-. f.,...'*.
TMA4K YOU IJ. ss p y.p...n. v.
Q',
s
.- ~.
L st It d
w s,.;,"
7 l #
- 10041.39 8 I.
e....--
e.
..n..
10001.39 8 100I1.39 a 10081.39 8 10 0 0 8.M,4,, i L.Gl.ffriW Mret @ %'; K"3? %.fri gs.@d'Q N8.. Tff47 t000Lf5,m,,
E f**
$,xy.$
P.:D W e...c M. %p g c.T C M...-.r
... -1;..._._--,-,..1 50001.39 a o 9,. 3'8 b
M inif' 3,3 ym j.
z.
r.. '.
i0081.If a. !
e Ad.,. -.E.. ';fc a 19877c 1%. -
53 Oe LE
.I'S 871.1.
jp w.--s-i m y.
M M;JJ:y M_,ga +
a 0 0 E.19 9 a-c2p:n,m.=uz-
.,- w n.
.e-m.. g 4
u m.u-en y
n u.m sooi l.,
n m'au m
M 11-~---' -iW'A..y.
M
- E0:09]E. 34'-M*TDDh% j.:W.
Wi'p:
. i' U ' p# p
?,,,
- 0.J:89]E-df-EU6-W'D'#.N Vf.: 5.?s E Vf.M'S 5-1 t
~
.- n3;n93 F. **i"#hME'-W= iP E 6 9 & & c-W +l
- m..
.- acn7gg. &M Q*[-W2Wa.MN @.SX M "tM.?.h.v "- c W i
hMt: M5/*.7 K' W-
~
at+-'d-I!
L 4e d$
M-
~9 8*9.M5D2--%;g..
Wq.
w.G.,,
E.p':
L. -lr%-
=...
.- E00370.
d - ~,secW T-&e
&3
>%9
. J2=.. 5
.- 0n705
_. ww-2:.e:w w.v :~x-m- w.&
Y...w,w.._ Ir+.' pew __ '-N- - h...
_;=
.< 0 ~....A:S
.n1
--.4 To..*W m rml g,,
- n. p.g..e-
- d_
= ' +
.-.r 9
E ui :av :'< Cui.;dT D.;. '.i'.. N
' - * ' + '#
" * ' 4 ~-
..r.,,",..,_....:
. :;.M
< w...
.-ah e
. -th pc ef
- ' '!--- 7.
"m
-,.H uc--
,G Arc. p: :t. **
m
'.15E
.a
)
,.r.
. ima nu
.u Dc e m.:..;sm
~
.;. C 3.*..<,.:...-...
1-L._%Tk;w--;.T. m'. M,..@;c I G ~Mh-X.t w.
- t -
2 sn
-.m i
54ECEIVED OF PETTY CASH
- r. h A
61
. 21 f
P0O aa, a w n.c.~
=
j w.
= =__
Attachmen(15-t'
y w_ 979'
,,nopf9
. t'23
,- a M ri 81ECilIVEt"* L8: PIITTY CAGH AECCIVED OF PETTY CAGH f
d A'
~ d i l$ s' ?
. ',. A A f $ ! N ' "
~. -
c.
..(
~_.
- 3....-.
gggy
.l
.i.
+
m
. r.zr -
t 8
nr*
,,n>r AECEIVIID OF PETTY CAGH 4
igl ACCEIVIID OF PETTY CAGH '
j 9
O _ re L
.l y / 7 io
~h v &
AbAtY e
~,.
,x~ ~. -
w
_MAtth.-~
.A&A
)+,
~ - -
\\
s,.., m s.s n.-.
s.
t
- m. i.m Y/ 9
-=N u.
- 77
%. 2. s 7
[
d AECCIVED OF PETTY CAGH v
't AECIIIVED OF PETTY CAGH M ' G= D i-l; )
~ -
~_lypA_
Sy n 3 11 7
=Q)pg
~~
e...-.~
- :sr-
-l
~,.._.
(
l 1
FM a _. _ /. ) < m
+ fj
,_,_jzin y
I m
AECCivEo OF PUTTY CAGH e
v AECIIIVED OF PETTY CAGH '
h i
4 4 zo
.a i t
(%,.nr jfadebyn 4 Ar$t_g4_A M
~ h ybA h.
1 f
a.,..
\\
t
.d/dA/.s, a
i
. A ! )n.lta A. % -
~ -. ~
e...-..
..-. ~
>I
. %asts. & L
~,..
m.
. negion. B. L Na
.A m s-
///f Amou,,. s N 'S
(
AECEIVED OF PETTY CAGH AECtilVED OF p";'. s'Y CAGH 4
(
e b4t$b -
g% dc<A
~,, %. =
-w-.
o,.m. w i
I i
II I h.l..._.%
. _. m. m 3
~..
s
..maai.6 & L p00 BRudit.
>L 1
\\
Q Attachrnen2 bi
,f.
Schedule of Charges for Plant and Plant Care 0.a_te_
Amount Description January 25, 1980
$ 112.33 Plants February 28, 1980 184.07 January 2, 1980 Plant Care Feb.1980 150.00
" Dec. 1979 December 2, 1979 150.00
" Nov. 1979 September 28, 1979 150.00*
" Sept. 1979 October 31, 1979 155.52*
" Oct. 1979 August 28, 1979 156.00
" Au9 1979 August 22, 1979 16.19 Plant July 31,1979 122.00 Plant Care July 1979 July 15,1979 10.50 Plants June 28, 1979
_ 115.00 Plant Care June 1979
$1,321.61 Date Amount June 27,1980
$ 184.08*
Plant and Plant Care June 1980 May 30, 1980 160.50 Plant Care May 1980 liarch 28, 1980 186.75 D
April 28, 1980 7ggepggdPlantCare
'60.50 Plant Care April 1980 February 4,1980 150.00 Plant Care Jan. 1980 S 841.83 Total
$2,163.44 h
- The support for the charges are shown in the next three (3) attachme t i
for sample purposes.
ns
}
' 7 JL
y i
I STATEMINT JEAN REUSING "INiERIOR PLANTSCAPES 12500 CEDAR 8 ROOK t A.
LAUREL, MD. 20811 r
Sept!28 9 79 orte
,o T71RA CORPORATION ADOtf55 Ford Building, Wisconsin A'> anne CITY l
~
STAft Zy Bethesda, Maryland
\\
L--
l r-I Plant maintenance 1
l L
I h
l {
month of September 150 00 ]
fb I
r.
{
i i
l-f I
h b
.\\n I
Y.
\\f V i
Ii
/^
i
?
{
l 6.
P i.
Thank you i
[
k l
.k
\\
I
.:r k-l l
Redifyrme 85 882
_....,,,,,_.,s,___,
l' 8
.?
~
5 i A 1 % AAt *%.
JEAN REUSING INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES 12500 CEDAR 8 ROOK t.A.
LAUREL, FAD. 20811 1
[ 31 To D^'s Oct 79 TERA CORPORATION ADDRESS Wisconsin Avenue crn STATE ZlP Bethesda, Maryland a
m-r2 - _
r, _.
s -
t,,
5.__ _
Plant Maintenance L
month of October g
+-
i 150 00 '.
p I
repotting fern l' 00 I
153 00 f
Chain 2 ft.
t i
1 60 l
l brackets i
80 Md. Tax 12 a,-
155 52 j-L A
i Thank You t[-
gj:>131
.L dif i
f l
[
i 1
t' i
$. ".i,.
-'*7 ;(
n-Redifyrms 85 882 U
m.. i. -.,
fi l
l l
. 9
'r i
i ST Af t M f *df
~
JEAN REUSING 1
I INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES I
22500 CEDARBROOK 1A.
O A
1.AUREL MD, 20311 T: & Y m_ I June!27 TO orre 9 80 72-y TERA CORPORATION
- q. ;,:
I., d: Ith/_1 miss
] 3 g/ :
Wisconsin Avenue
{ '
cnv
~~
sr4 Bethesda, Maryland t.
w
{ *ltr E
h i__
4, Plant Maintenance
~:
June 1980 160 50
~~-
j f
Planter (
off)
_9 95 i
k
[
)
{i _
Plant (Replace stolen plan b) 12 JO l
l k
I - t r
Sales Tax n
3
- 1 13 i
l
=
V.'
L 184 08 3
b t
i E
i 9
Thank You i
E k
E E
i
(
i U.
h i
f.
t I
i k
s 1.
i
[
F 1-o
=
i i
{
a r.
e w
t I
\\.
3 1
I t
it
. as-ca2 u = -...
- .a..
hws s 5
I, 1
7' V
i.
(w I'
IM iM
+
l TASC Purchase of Xerox Pape_r Description (Color) _50_0 Sheets / Ream Vendor Amount Reams _
Green Blue Salmon Pink Buff Stanford Paper Co. $ 114.54 30 30 350.70 100 50 50 117.39 30 10 10 10 206.21 60 20 10 10 20 98.16 30 10 10 10 33.54 10 10 165.26 50 10 10 10 10 10 114.53 30 10 10 10 33.65 10 10 100.64 30 10 20 10 38.96 10 134.18 40 20 10 10 10 48.46 10 343.31 90 60 30 120.33 40 30 10 Stanford Paper Co.
302.40 100 40 30 30 52_,322.26 670 300 150 30 60 130 670 Reams 0 500 Sheet / ream = 335,000 sheets i
l l
- ++,ch-nnt 91
n.9 s.:s i:.- :; ; 14 l
!.-- ?.
ll var n z
- .
- .-.-.--J..-.:........
r 1
,f.
7 cort j
o N
sJ!mU'.
W l
.gg.e nr. rana 3,gggxg
- - -~ ~.~
8" P
F*
- l. J w DW. D 2 Do'
- 8'
..,6
............/.
l w e e. '** "
- -~'
6.
w.
ye.
uo u2.s.. u o.an w.toa sw.w2
. t J.J*
I
'Pa
- o. -
1;t. :tn 'c?:h 761 6..
....e..
.,..s 4.,.u... v. t :...v.w...
.~
~.
3 8
.s....
1 e s.
ei y
s s
1. I37
'd 1
.i,...
y, I 'd,* ;e,.,... _.. u. _--. -....~.... -. -.....,*
- s. ;,g. h:: =.s/t.fa
- ? 11...-20 4
e e
i
...s.
.e.**'..
-: a.o s
e.
to to g,L.
IU I
8' 3
Q, 1
'"..1.'bk
- a/s.e.
gy gy o
. e.
13.,
4
-a
. 1 t.
,o..
("e*
13 6
r,.e.,
t._..
gg g
.......m...-.
,,, : y-1S
- 1_5, A', )
75,...,c.6 7.
s-7..
ce
,5 *
..6
[,,,
s-1;U:ST*S f*TtFC k
,17 2.I,
' 1 W;M
~'
...v. c
.te
- e, t t
.c-I67/e.;i.#2 3 Na os e....-
~
57.l:3 UTZ ad A r..
6 sa va.
t t, N.= z ',
20 t
p.ru voa a. a.v.
Jo
- n.'e t te.~./ ;::
P F-E 93377
~
ll. Y:-)-
22
- 1L t.1...
22
, o v at.
g n
1 F d=6 vt e=e.e.
e4 24_
{
t ET.Et ~'
lav.s.-
,L...-:.. '. ' -.
,d _
,.v.,.
ys rs g
,l 1...., w e,n x
i.> u n
,.?
' d G / w _._3 08673 l
.. ~
.=
e 30 30 g
t y. s.,
'n u. u... :.+e :..
, a.n sn s
yop. l1*
g y
' fi; ?-TeD'-!:.R$q...v:.. -:;.:.-MR:=fJPJ l
I g
e d}.:.
.T, ~ @LMSO..UD EEDL.MNT.'M.Ei.M swo a am e=4 =*
c.1 u m s.uu.rm 7::: T.- " -
'.'. tat 'a' zz.NW ~.
.% 'E;.7
- 7.c cm sun m=
f *-; A...- Wrf &cznDC Td Wem g" ;,'el"'.]
~
i arnvrm
. a.*.'1FT 5,.O.1543 Ma 9.n. CL.e.
.m3 peg n-3,qt.er.es_.s.m.
~
..... 4 l
.. a unnuo Amunes tusToutR s copy c,,,,3,c a cn.
j starontanft ri.
Do esor otsinov 1:cKn(sb
,w i.
,e.
s.._
.mu.
n,.
g ~;
s p,--a,_
3 m,.,
P N 4...----'.Y5 3 c2AF S 1
..e.pa,.
s
'W M.....
- ~
. p -.. ~.:..
- t. :..
- 4. c., s.
...g g
2......... -. -
- ... ac. r-.
h
\\ s..
l
.r.
...3 L. ~,.,...
016 24 153c1629 3 l
s.
.g,..,.
I GutifelCORD Pr29 23097
!p/./
Marr.ll.
io
.-./.....--....
P00R BRWM' Attachment 23 l
<m
.. e-w m
,.:Y a
I e:
_ Eculpment Maintenance Charoes Type of Charces 4
Amount Repair of microfiche i
equipment 8
00*IO I
Cleaning of Disc Packs 809.00
- Repair of microfiche equipment 121.00 Computer Power System-repair 174.95 Camera Repair Fil ters 268.80 482.71 l
_S1.963.24
,f e'
I l
g l
I l
l l
'i
i..
s Pablications and Subscriptions, Type of Chargre or Type of Document Description Amount Pocket Flight Guides Subscription shows flights
$ 200.52 for major cities even thou h the large issue of the airline guide had been procured.
Travel Planner 42.08 Seminar Employment Practices 95.00 Seminar.
Government Publications The Contractor procured 690.00 the " Titles of the Cooe of Federal Regulation," "Tederal Register," " Affirmative Action and Equal Employment-A Guide-book for Employees," " Division 1-10 of Regulation Guides,"
" Atomic Energy Legislation through 94th Congress, 2nd Session," and other publica-tions which could be issued by NRC or would not affect the ability to perform the Contract.
Commercial Publication The Contractor procured "Busi-2,420.78 ness Week," " Wall Street Journal,"
"DBi15 User Survey," " Directory of Electric Utilities" (2 sets),
" Environmental Reporter," " Nucleonics j
Ueek," "Inside NRC" and "Uashington V Series - Strategy and Tactics for Getting a Government Job."
i Establishment of Deposit Account Established a deposit account 50.00 with the Superintendent of Documents to be used when ordering documents.
d L.
m Page 2 Publication and Subscriptions Continued.
Type of Charge or
_ Title of Document Description Amount Association Membership The Contractor paid for S
35.00 the membership in a Word Processing Association.
This would not appear to be of any benefit to the contractor's performance on the contract.
$3,433.38 Analysis Could have been provided by NRC "Inside NRC"(Renewal)
$ 345.00
" Division 1-10 Reg Guides" 47.00
" Nucleonics Weekly"($555.00) and "InsideNRC"($345.00) 900.00
$1,292.75 All others that should be disallowed
$2,140.63 Total
$3,433.38 i
I i
i t
i
--