ML19347D867
| ML19347D867 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/12/1981 |
| From: | Kammerer C NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| To: | Percy C SENATE |
| References | |
| FRN-45FR67018, FRN-45FR70874, RULE-PR-150, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-32, RULE-PR-70 45FR67018, 45FR70874, 81-0274, 81-274, NUDOCS 8104140354 | |
| Download: ML19347D867 (3) | |
Text
__ _
S1 - oa.74
- ~
- d
.A UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
r, p;i (y 7, y
wAsuswoTow. o. c.2 ossa jj V O%./
MAR 12.198f C
4 72
~
m cm
- at
~
The Honorable Charles Percy 9"
c7fut ' 48/
2 3
p W%)
'cp9 J
United States Senate x
Washington, D.C.
20510 n
g y
"m
Dear Senator Percy:
r es Thank you for your letter dated February 27, 1981 on behalf of your constituent, Louise Roth, concerning two proposed changes in NRC regulations.
Both changes would relieve licensees of unnecessary and costly regulatory burdens.
The first, published for coment in the Federal Register on October 17, 1980, and approved by the Comission as a final rule on February 26, 1981, will allow NRC licensees to dispose of liquid scintillation media and animal carcasses containing trace quantities of hydrogen-3 or carbon-14 without regard to their radioactivity. The items in question are widely used in research laboratories and-hospitals thropghout the country. Most licensees presently, dispose of these items by sending them to a radio-active waste burial ground or by obtaining special authorization from NRC for incineration or onsite burial.
@ggf!$
ed
.NA' Scintillation media are toxic and flamable, while animal carcasses important public health problem than their radioactivity, which jn research ere sometimes pathogenic. These characteristics pose a
'1/
'C uJte,/kig.,ISS
/
6 T
small, and licensees will still be required to comply with applicay1E Federal, State and local laws governing chemical and biological hadrds%
in their disposal.
},
$Qgg,q/A[-
~
,x
..A,
'N,
In addition to eliminating a costly and needless regulatory burden f />
q T p </ ~
many hospitals and research facilities, the change have several other se positive effects. Present disposal in commercial radioactive waste disposal grounds necessitates the transportation of these wastes, often over great distances, and at great escense to licensees. The transportation poses difficult handling probler'. etruse the scintillation media are both flammable and chemically..ar d oq=nic, and the decaying carcasses, in addition to being unsaa'd itf, pneiate methane gas which can explode or otherwise rupture was? c R grf. The wastes consu:ne scarce waste l
disposal grounds capacity, whic..a gold otherwise be used for radioactive l
wastes truly requiring buhal. Moreove", should the three existing low-level radioactive wastes burial sites be closed for any reason, there could be a prompt and, serious interdption of biomedical research and diagnostic l
activities throughout the nation.
I am enclosing for the information of your constit 2ent a copy of the final rule adopted by the Comission as well as a con of the value/ impact statement prepared by the NRC staff to support the rule.
The other proposed rule, published for comment in the Federal Register
\\g on October 27, 1980, would amend existing regulations to exempt from k
's licensing and regulatory requirements technetium-99 and low-enriched uranium as residual contamination in any smelted alloy.
M k
l sloA u0359 Y
l l
e l
+..
-. MAR 12 1981 The rulemaking was originally undertaken by ihe Comission at the request of the Department of Energy and pursuant to a 1974 amendment (P.L.93-377) to the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954. The rulemaking would permit the recycling of scrap metal from discarded equipment at DOE's uranium This scrap metal is sometimes contaminated with small enrichment plants.
amounts of byproduct or'special nuclear material resulting from the enrich-This contamination cannot practically be removed but is ment process.
considered too insignificant to constitute a radiation health or safety problem.
Until Congress amended the AEA in 1974, it was necessary for the Comission to issue a specific license for the possession of this type of radioactive material, no matter how small the quantity.
In amending the Act, Congress j
gave the Commission the authority to exempt minute quantities of special i
nuclear material from its licensing requirements if it finds that a licensing exemption "will not constitute an unreasonable risk to the comon defense and security and to the health and safety of the public."
We would like to emphasize that under the propos'd amendments persons e
who smelt scrap contaminated with technetium-99 or low-enriched uranium or who are the first transferors of such smelted alloy would not be exempt from licensing requirements.
Such persons would be under license and would be required to submit a description of the decontamination and smelting
' procedures and sampling and analytical procedures to be used. This would assure that the smelted alloys subsequently to be used under the exemption meet the proposed maximum contamination limits.
It is also should be noted that the scope of the exemption is narrow permitting only the technetium-99 and low-enriched uranium as the contaminants. Contaminants such as pluto-nium, high-enriched uranium or other transuranics are not included in the exemption. The Tc-99 amd low-enriched uranium would be minor constituents (less than 5 parts per million (ppm) and 17.5 ppm, respectively) of representative' samples of smelted alloys.
The resulting levels of contamination would be at or below those of many products comonly in use which contain traces of unenriched uranium. For example, most building materials contain some traces of uranium (granite, 4.7 ppm; cement, 3.4 ppm; by-product gypsum,13.7 ppm). Dental porcelain, used in making false teeth, has been found to contain from 10 to 990 ppm uranium. The U.S. NRC upper limit for unimportant quantities of unenriched urantun is 500 ppm. There is essentially no difference in the nature of the radioactivity emitted from this unenriched uranium and the low-enriched uranium being considered for exemption.
The NRC staff has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in support of the proposed rule. Without the exemption, thousands of tons of government-owned nickel, copper, iron and steel scrap would have to be disposed of as radioactive wcste at substantial. cost to the taxpayers.
If exempted, this metal could be smelted down and resold for in excess of
$40 million.
Further, energy savings from recycle have been estimated at the equivalent of about 170,000 barrels of crude oil or 30,000 Mg of coal. By comparison with these benefits, the risk of cancer from release and unrestricted use of the entire inventory of smelted alloy is estimated
. MAR 12 1981 to be considerably less than one. This mean's that it is highly unlikely that the recycled alloy would cause even one cancer in one person in the total U.S. population..
Notice of the proposed rule was made in the Federal Register and the press on October 27, 1980. The comment period expired December 11, 1980.
j Connents received after the expiration date will be considered if it is practical to do so. To date, over 3.000 public comments have been received. Comments will be reviewed and addressed in the Final EIS before any decision is made by the Commission on promulgation of a final rule. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Your interest in these matters is appreciated.
Sincerely, j@(., Carlton Kame ire or Office of Congressional Affairs
Enclosures:
,As stated
-