ML19347D196
| ML19347D196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1981 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347D194 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103110443 | |
| Download: ML19347D196 (25) | |
Text
e PARTIAL REVIEW 0F EQUIPMENT EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION FOR ARKANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE - UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-368 3 STAFF EQUIPMENT EVALUATION The staff evaluation of the licensee's rasponse included an examination of the licensee's report for completeness and acceptability.
The criteria described in the 00R guidelines and in NUREG-0588, in part, were used as a basis for the staff evaluation of the adequacy of the licensee's qualification program.
The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed a preliminary evaluation of the licensee's response and documented it in a technical evaluation report (TER) dated December 10, 1980.
An onsite verification inspection of selected safety related electrical equipment will be conducted in May 1981 during the scheduled plant outage.
The inspection will review the reactor coolant system to verify proper installation of equipment, overall interface integrity, and manufacturers' nameplate data.
The manufacturer's name and model number from the nameplate data will be compared to information given in the Component Evalu-ation Work Sheets (CES) of the licensee's report.
The site inspection will be documented in a supplemental report, and any deficiencies will be identified.
For this. review, the TER referenced above has been factored into the overall staff evaluation.
3.1 Comoleteness of Safety-Related Eauipment In accordance with IEB 79-01B, the licensee was directed to (1) establish a list of systems and equipment that are required to mitigate a LOCA and an tiELB and (2) identify components needed to perform tt.e function of safety-related display information, post-accident sampling and monitoring, and radiation monitoring.
The staff developed a generic master list based upon a review of plant safety analyses and emergency procedures.
The instrumentation selected includes parameters to monitor overall plant performance as well as to monitor the per-formance of the systems on the list.
The systems list was established on the t
i basis of the functions that must be per'.ormed for accident mitigation (without regard to location of equipment relative to hostile environments).
l The list of safety-related systems provided by the licensee was reviewed against the staff-developed master list.
l Based upon information in the licensee's submittal, the equipment location references, and in some cases subsequent conversations with the licensee, the staff has verified and determined that the systems included in the licensee's submittal are those required to achieve or support:
(1) emergency reactor shutdown, (2) containment isolation, (3) reactor core cooling, (4) containment l
heat removal, (5) core residual heat removal, and (6) prevention of signifi-l cant release of radioactive material to the environment.
The staff therefore 1
8103110 &.
b
concludes that the systems identified by the licensee (listed in Appendix D) are acceptable, with the exception of those items discussed in Section 5 of this report.
Display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not specifically identified by the licensee.
A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must be provided.
Equipnent qualifi-cation information in the form of summary sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumentation exposed to harsh environments.
Instrumen',ation which is not considered to be safety related but which is mentione; in the emergency procedure should appear on the list.
For these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent failure will not mislead the operator er adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident.
The environmental qualifi-cation of post-accident sampling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications and will be performed in conjunction with that review.
The licensee identified 281 items of equipment which were assessed by the staff.
3.2 Service Conditions Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 requires that the D0R g:/idelines and the "For Comment" NUREG-0588 are to be used as the criteria for establishing the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment environmental quali-fication program.
These documents provide the option of establishing bounding pressure and temperature condition based on plant-specific analysis identified in the licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or t'ased on generic profiles using the methods identified in these documents.
On this basis, the staff has assumed, unless otherwise noted, that the analysis for developing the environmental envelopes relative to the temperature, pressure, and the containment spray caustic:>, has been performed in accordance with the requirements stated above. The staff has reviewed the qualification documentation to ensure that the qualification specifications envelope the conditions established by the licensee.
During this review, the staff assumed that for plants designed and equipped with an automatic containment spray system which satisfies the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions arc enveloped by the large-break-LOCA environmental conditions.
The staff performed an evaluation of the licensee's automatic containment spray system and verified the licensee's claim that the system is not subjected to a disabling single-component failure and therefore satisfies the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the D0R guidelines.
Equipment sum ergence has also been addressed where the possibility exists that flooding of equipment may result from HELBs.
3.3 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment The licensee has provided the results of accident analyses as follows:
Max Temp ( F)
Max Press (psig)
Humidity (%)
LOCA JS9 48 100 MSLB (not provided)
(not provided) 100 The staff has concluded that the minimum temperature profile for equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account for higher-than-average temperatures in the upper regions of the containment that can exist due to stratification, especially following a postulated MSLB.
Use of the steam saturation temperature corresponding to the total building pressure (partial pressure of steam plus partial pressure of air) versus time will provide an acceptable margin for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling, as to potential adverse environmental effects on equipment.
The licensee's specified temperature (service condition) of 289 F does not satisfy the above requirement.
A saturation tennperature corresponding to the peak profile (295 F peak temperature at 48 psig) should be used instead.
The licensee should update his equipment summary tables to reflect this change.
If there is any equipment that does not meet the staff position, the licensee must pr. ovide either justification that the equipment will perform its intended function under the specified conditions or propose corrective action.
3.4 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Outside Containment The licensee has provided the temperature, pressure, humidity and applicable environment associated with an HELB outside containment.
The following areas outside containment in the auxiliary building have been addressed:
(1) Main steam chase and pipeways areas (2) Main feedwater penetration, chiller equipment, and heater and compressor areas (3) Norht piping area (4) Steam generator penetration areas, pump areas, and access areas (5) Emergency feedwater pump and access areas (6) South piping penetration area (7) Charging and letdown areas.
The staff has verified that the parameters identified by the licensee for the MSLB are acceptable.
3.5 Submergence The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the licensee.
Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordance with the appropriate criteria as established by Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21.
b The licensee's value for maximum submergence is at elevation 343 ft 6 in.
Equipment below this level has been identified by the licensee, along with the proposed corrective action.
The licensee identified four safety-related electrical components for Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit 2 as having the potential for becoming submerged after a postulated event.
Two of the items (Rotork Valves Items I-027 and 028) have been subjected to qualification testing under submerged conditions for 30 days.
These tests were previously reviewed by the staff and have been found acceptable.
For "e remaining two items (containment sump level sensors by DeLeval - Items I-025 1d 026), the information provided by the licensee is not complete enough to en.
e that adequate equipment operability is maintained under submerged conoitions.
The licensee is required to supplement the information and document the qualification methodology which assures that the equipment will maintain its functional operability or justify the design on some defined basis.
The licensee's response should provide an assessment of the failure modes associated with the submergence of these level sensors.
The licensee should also provide assurance that the subsequent failure of this ct:aponent will not adversely affect any other safety functions or mislead an operator.
If the results of the licensee's assessment are acceptable, then the equipment may be exempt from the submergence parameter of qualification.
3.6 Chemical Spray The licensee's FSAR value for the chemical concentration is 15,000 ppm boric acid solution, 0.1% sodium hydroxide (by weight) and 1% sodium thiosulfate by weight at a pH of 10.5.
During the review, staff identified several items of equipment that were tested with caustic spray concentrations significantly less than that used in the plant.
The licensee is therefore required to justify the adequacy of this design on some defined tasis or modify the design accordingly.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
3.7 Aoino Section 7 of the DDR guidelines does not require a qualified life to be estab-lished for all safety-related electrical equipment.
However, the following actions are required:
(1) Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the materials identi-fied in Appendix C of the DDR guidelines.
The first supplement tc IEB-79-01B requires licensees to utilize the table in Appendix C and identify any additional materials as the result of their effort.
(2)
Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age-related degradations.
(3) Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed components.
The licensee identified a number of equipment items for which a specified qualified life was established (for example, 40 years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review tie adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; th( staff has assumed that the established values are based on state-of-the art technology and are acceptable.
For this review, however, the staff requires that the licensee submit supple-mental information to verify and identify the degree of conformance to the above requirements.
The response should include all the equipment identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environments.
The licensee indicated that this phase of the response is outstanding and that the review is in progress.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss its evaluation in a supplemental report.
- 3. 8 Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment)
The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to exist following a LOCA.
The application and methodology employed to determine these values. were presented to the licensee as part of the NRC staff criteria con-tained in the DOR guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the guidance provided in IEB-79-01B, Supplement 2.
Therefore, for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the prescribed criteria.
The staff review determined that the values to which equipment was qualified enveloped the reouirements identified by the licensee.
The value required by the licensee inside containment is an integrated dose of 3.3 x 107 rads.
The radiation service condition provided by the licensee is lcwer than that provided in the DOR guidelines for gamma and beta radiation.
The licensee is requested to either provide the justification for using the lower service condition, or use the service condition provided in the DOR guidelines for both the gamma and beta radiation.
If the former option is chosen, then the analysis--including the basis, assumptions, and a sample calculation--should be provided.
A required value outside of containment of 1 x 107 rads has been used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels within the shutdown heat exchanger room, emergency feedwater pump rooms, and the high pressure injection pump rooms of the auxiliary building.
The licensee stated that the radiation environment outsidi the containment in these areas consists of the dose due to the recirculating p-imary coolant and the dose due to airborne activity in the building resulting ' rom leakage of primary coolant.
This value appears to consider the radiat,on levels influenced by the source term methodology asso-ciated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines and is therefore acceptable.
4 QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT The following subsections present the staff's assessment, based on the licensee's submittal, of the qualification status of safety-related electrical equipment.
The staff has separated the safety-related equipment into three categories:
(1) equipment q uiring inmediate corrective action, (2) equipment requiring additional qualification information and/or corrective action, and (3) equip-ment considered acceptable if the staff's concern identified in Section 3.7 is satisfactorily resolved.
In its assessment of the licensee's submittal, the NRC staff did not review the methodology employed to determine the values established by the licensee. '
However, in reviewing the data sheets, the staff made a determination as to the stated conditions presented by the licensee.
Additionally, the staff has not completed its review of supporting documentation referenced by the licen-see (for example, test reports).
It is expected that when the review of test reports is complete, the environmental qualification data bank established by the staff will provide the means to cross reference each supporting document to the referencing licensee.
If supporting documents are found to be unacceptable, the licensee will be required to take additional corrective actions to either establish qualifi-cation or replace the item (s) of concern.
This effort will begin in early 1981.
l An appendix for each subsection of this report provides a list of equipment for which additional information and/or corrective action is required.
Where l
appropriate, a reference is provided in the appendices to identify deficiencies.
It should be noted, as in the Commission Memorandum and Order, that the deficien-cies identified do not necessarily mean that equipment is unqualified.
- However, they are cause for concern and may require further case-by-case evaluation.
4.1 Equipment Requiring Immediate Corrective Action Deliberately left blank.
l l
4.2 Equipment Requiring Additional Information and/or Corrective Action Appendix B identifies equipment in this category, including a tabulation of deficiencies.
The deficiencies are noted by a letter relating to the legend l
(identified below), indicating that the information provided is not sufficient for the qualification parameter or condition.
Legend R
- radiation T
- temperature QT qualification time RT - required time P
pressure H
- humidity CS - chemical spray A
- material-aging evaluation; replacement schedule; ongoing equipment surveillance 5
- submergence M
- margin l
I
- HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM qualification method RPN - equipment relocation or replacement; adequate schedule not provided l.
EXN - exempted equipment justification inadequate SEN - separate-effects qualification justification inadequate QI qualification information being developed RPS - equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided As noted in Section 4, these deficiencies do not necessarily mean that the equipment is unqualified.
However, the deficiencies are cause for concern and reauite further case-by-case evaluation.
The staff has determined that an acceptable basis to exempt equipment from qualification, in whole or part, can be established provided the following can be established and verified by the licensee:
(1) Equipment does not perform essential safety functions in the harsh environ-ment, and equipment failure in the harsh environment will not impact safety-related functions or mislead an operator.
(2a) Equipment performs its function before its exposure to the harsh environ-ment, and the adequacy for the time margin provided is adequately justified, and (2b) Subsequent failure of the ;quipment as a result of the harsh environment does not degrade other safety functions or mislead the operator.
1 (3) The safety-related function can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that has been adequately qualified and satisfies the single-failure criterion.
(4) Equipment will not be subjected to a harsh environment as a result of the postulated accident.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented by providing resolutions to the deficiencies identified; these resolutions should include a description of the corrective action, schedules for its completion (as applicable), and so forth. The staff will review the licensee's response, when it is submitted, and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
l It should be noted that in cases where testing is being conducted, a condition may arise which results in a determiaation by the licensee that the equipment i
does not satisfy the qualification test requirements.
For that equipment, the licensee will be required to provide the proposed corrective action, on a timely basis, to ensure that qualification can be established by June 30, 1982.
4.3 Equipment Considered Acceptable or Conditionally Acceptable Based on the staff review of the licensee's submittal, the staff identified I
the equipment in Appendix C as (1) acceptable on the basis that the qualifi-cation program adequately enveloped the specific environmental plant parameters, or (2) conditionally acceptable subject to the satisfactory resolution of the staff concern identified in Section 3.7.
l For the equipment identified as conditionally acceptable, the staff determined that the licensee did not clearly (1) state that an equipment material evaluation was conducted to ensure that no known materials susceptible to degradation because of aging have been
- used, (2) establish an ongoing program to review the plant surveillance and main-tenance records in order to identify equipment degradation which may be age related, and/or (3) propose a maintenance program and replacement schedule for equipment identified in item 1 or equipment tha'. is qualified for less than the life of the plant.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented for equipment in this category before full acceptance of this equipment can be established.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is sub-mitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
5 DEFERRED REQUIREMENTS IES79-01B, Supplement 3 has relaxed the time constraints for the submission of the information associated with cold shutdown equipment and TMI lessons-learned modifications.
The staff has required that this information be provided by February 1, 1981.
The staff wi'll provide a sepplemental safety evaluation addressing these concerns.
i APPENDIX B Equipment Requiring Additional.Information and/or Corrective Action (Category 4.2)
LEGEND:
l l
Designation for Deficiency l
l R - Radiation l
T - Ter<rature l
QT. Qw,.ication time l
RT - Required time l
P - Pressure H - Humidity CS - Chemical spray A - Material aging evaluation, replacement schedule, ongoing equipment surveillance l
5 - Subnergence l
M - Margin I - HELB evaluation outside containment not completed l
QM - Qualificatinn method RPN - Equipment relocation or replacement, adequate schedule not provided EXN - Exempted equipment justification inadequate l
SEN - Separate effects qualification justification inadequate j
QI - Qualification information being developed RPS - Equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-001 Motor-Operated Valve EBV Systems Electrip RT,QT-M, Valve CS-EXN,A I-004 Motor-Operated Valve EBV Systems Electrip RT,QT-M, CS-EXN,A I-007 Motor-Opera ted Valve EBV Systems Electrip RT,QT-M, CS-EXN,A I-010 Motor-Oper ated Valve EBV Systems Electrip RT,QT-M, CS-EXN,A I-002 Motor-0perated Valve Limitorque SMB-3 CS,QI,A B-1
APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-005 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-3 CS,QI,A I-008 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-3 CS,QI,A I-011 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMS-3 CS,QI,A I-013 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-3 CS,QI,A I-014 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-3-100 CS,QI,A I-015 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-10 CS,QI,A I-016 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMS-000-5 CS,QI,A I-017 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-5 CS,QI,A l
I-018 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-5 CS,QI,A l
l I-019 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMS-000-5 CS,QI,A I-020 Motor-0perated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-5 CS,QI,A l
I-031 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-5 CS,QI,A I-032 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-7 CS,QI,A 1-033 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-000-5 CS,QI,A i
I-050 Motor Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-1-40 CS,QI,A I-051 Motor-Operated Valve Limitorque SMB-1-40 CS,QI,A I-025 Level Sensor EMS DeLeval XM-36496 T-M,P-M,A,5 I-026 Level Sensor EMS DeLeval XM-36496 T-M,P-M,A,5 I-027 Valve Motor Operator Rotork 70NAI(S)
CS,A I-034 Valve Operator Target Rock 74F-00-3-2 QT,RT,QI,CS,A I-035 Vr; a Operator Target Rock 74F-015 QT,RT,QI,CS,A
~'
I-048 Valve Operator Target Rock 74F-012 QT,RT,QI,CS,A I-049 Valve Operator Target Rock 74F-011 QT,RT,QI,CS,A I-044 Motor Baldor N3534TEFC QFM,CS,R,A B-2
t J
APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipme.it Manufacturer Model Deficiency
'I-045 Motor' Baldor N3534TEFC QFM,CS,R,A I-046 Motor Baldor N3534TEFC QFM,CS,R,A I-047 Motor Baldor.
N3534TEFC QFM,CS,R,A I-078 Valve Operator Limitorque SMB-0010 QI,A I-079.
Valve Operator Limitorque SMB-0015 QI,A I-098 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-099 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-100 Pump. Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,F,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-101 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-102 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M.,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-103 Pump Spet. Sensors Bently Nevada T, P,11, R c;'T,
Corp CS,A I-104 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A i
1-105 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-106 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-107 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,Qi, Corp CS,A I-108 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT,
~
Corp CS,A I-109 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A B-3
D' APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-110 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-111 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-112 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-113 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-114 Pump Speed sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-115 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-116 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-117 Pump 3 peed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-11B Pump Speed Sensers Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-119 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-120 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A 1
l I-121 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-122 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp 6, A I-123 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, l
Corp CS,A l
I-124 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A l
I-125 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, i
Corp CS,A l
l B-4 l
L
e APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-126 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-127 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-128 Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-129' Pump Speed Sensors Bently Nevada T,P,M,R,QT, Corp CS,A I-130 Radiation Detector Victoreen 877-1 QI,A I-231 Radiation Detector Victoreen 877-1 QI,A I-155 Electrical Penetration Amphenol 3X350MCM(LV)
T,P,A I-136 Raychem Instrument QI,A Cable Outside Containment A-001 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-10 QI,A A-003 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-5-350 QI,A A-004 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-5 QI,A i
l A-005 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-10 QI,A A-007 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-5-350 QI,A l
l A-008 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-5 QI,A 1
l A-022 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-2 QI,A A-023 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-2 QI,A A-024 Motor Operator Limitorque SM3-000-2 QI,A v
A-038 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-2 QI,A l
A-041 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-2 QI,A A-044 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000 R-QI,A l
l B-5 l
i
APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency A-045 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-000 R-QI,A A-046 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-000 R-QI,A A-047 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-000 R-QI,A
' 048 Motor Operator Limiterque SP3-000 R-QI,A r-A-050 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-0005 E-QI,A A-051 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-0005 R-QI,A A-052 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-0005 R-QI,A A-055 Motcr Operator Limitorque SP3-000-2 R-QI,A A-056 Motor Operator Limitorque SME-000-2 R-QI,A A-057 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-0GO-2 R-QI,A A-058 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-000-2 R-QI,A A-059 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-000-2 R-QI,A A-060 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-000-2 R-C,A A-061 Motor Operator L.mitorque SMB-000-2 R-QI,A A-078 Motor Operator Limitorque SME-0010 QI,A A-079 Motor Operator Liraitorque SMB-00 QI,A A-080 Motor Operator Limiterque SMS-1-40 QI,A f
A-082 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00 QI,A A-083 Motor Operator Limitorque SP3-00 QI,A l
A-084 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-1-40 QI,A i
A-087 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-00 QI,A A-088 Motor C,3erator Limitorque SMS-00 QI,A A-0C Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-00 QI,A A-091 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00 QI,A B-6 t
O APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency A-092 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00 QI,A A-093 Motor Operator Limitorque SMS-1-40 QI,A' A-096 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-5 QI,A A-097 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000 QI,A A-100 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-0-15 QI,A A-101 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-0-15 QI,A A-111 Motor Oporator Limitorque SMB-000-5 QI,A A-112 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00 QI,A A-113 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00 QI,A A-130 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-7\\
QI,A A-134 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000-5 QI,A A-140 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-000 QI,A A-145 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-7 QI,A A-146 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-7 QI,A A-150 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-7 QI,A 1
4 A-152 Motor Operator Limitorque SMB-00-7 QI,A A-002 Valve Operator Rockwell X
R,T,QM,QI,A A-006 Valve Operator Rockwell X
R,T,QM,QI,A A-009 Motor Reliance o3PACYA R,A A-010 Motor Reliance BHPACYA R,A A-011 Motor Reliance BHPACYA R,A A-012 Motor Reliance BHPACYA R,A A-013 Motor Reliance BHPACYA R,A A-014 Motor Reliance BHPACVA R,A B-7
_~
l l
APPENDIX B (Continued) i Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency i
A-015 Cooler Motor Am. Air 5 HP R.T,QM, Filter Corp.
QI,A A-016 Cooler Motor Am. Air 10 HP R,T,QM, Filter Corp.
QI,A A-025 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A A-026, Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A A-031 Motor Operator Electro /0yne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A
~
A-032 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A A-033 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A A-036 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI,A A-049 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB10 QM,QI A A-062 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB20 R,QI,A A-064 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne i.?200/MB20 R,QI,A A-070 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB20 R,QI,A A-071 Motor Operator Electro / Dyne TN200/MB20 R,QI,A A-027 Electr/ Hydro. Valve Civ. I. Corp.
QM,QI,A,T,R A-028 Electr/ Hydro. Valve Civ. I. Corp.
2340-390 T,R,QM,QI,A A-029 Electr/ Hydro. Valve Civ. I. Corp.
2340-390 T,R,QM,QI,A A-030 Electr/ Hydro. Valve Civ. I. Corp.
2340-390 T,R,QM,QI,A A-034 Rad Monitor Westinghouse 654 T,R,QM,QI,A l
A-035 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI,A A-037 Flow Switch ITT Barten 289A T,R,QM,QI 1 A-063 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI A A-065 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI,A A-066 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI,A B-8
APPENDIX d (Continued)
Item Equiprrent Manufacturer Model Deficiency A-06)
Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI,A A-068 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A T,R,QM,QI,A A-069 Flow Switch ITT Barton 289A i,R,QM,QI,A A-13; Pressure Switch ITT Barton 288A T,R,QM,QI,A A-141, Pressure Switch ITT Barton 288A T,R,QM,QI,A A-144 Pressure Switch ITT Barton 288A T,R,QM,QI,A A-148 Pressure Switch ITT Barton 288A T,R,QM,QI,A A-094 Pressure Trarsmitter Foxboro E11DM R,QI,A A-055 Pressure Trinsmitter Foxboro EllDM R,QI,A A-072 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 42 QM,R,A A-073 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 42 QM,R,A A-074 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 42 QM,0,A A-075 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 42 QM,R,A A-076 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 42 QM,R,A A-077 Flow Transmitter Fischer Porter 7210A-5503A82 QM,QI,A A-081 Flos Transmitter Fischer Porter 7210A-5503A82 QM,QI,A A-086 Flow Transmitter Fischer Porter 7210A-5503A82 QM,QI,A A-090 Flow Transmitter Fischer Porter 7210A-5503A82 QM,QI,A A-098 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 042 QM,R,A A-099 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 042 QM,R,A A-131 Pump Motor Allis Chalmers 123 QM,QI,A v
A-108 Pump Motor GE SK6404AK233 QM,QI,A A-109 Pump Motor GE SK6405AK233 QM,QI,A A-110 Pump Motor GE SK6404AK233 QM,QI,A
~
B-9
-2 APPENDIX B (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency A-114 Fan Motor Westinghouse SBDP QM,QI,A A-115 Fan Motor Westinghouse 58 QM,QI,A A-116 Fan Motor Westinghouse 58 QM,QI,A A-119 Motor Operator Fisher Control QM,QI,A A-120.
Motor Operator Fisher Control QM,QI,A A-121 Motor Operator Fisher Control QM,QI,A A-122 Motor Operator Fisher Control QM,QI,A A-125 Radiation Element Westinghouse T,QM,QI,A A-126 Radiation Element Westinghouse T,QM,QI,A A-127 Solenoid Valve Target Rock 74F-010 QM,QI,A A-128 Speed Transmitter Terry Steam QM,QI,A Turbine Co.
A-129 Speed Transmitter Terry Steam QM,QI,A Turbine Co.
A-149 Valve Operator Copes Vulcon Electro /Hyd.
QM,QI,A,T A-151 Valve Operator Copes Vulcon Electro /Hyd.
QM,QI,T,A A-153 E/H Valve Act_ator EBV Systems EFCO-MATIC 4 QM,QI,T,A Inc.
A-154 E/H Valve Actuator EBV Systems EFCO-MATIC 4 QM,QI,T,A Inc.
A-155 E/H Valve Actuator EBV Systems EFCO-MATIC 4 QM,QI,T,A Inc.
A-156 E/H Valve Actuator EBV Systems EFC0-MATIC 4 QM,QI,T,A v
Inc.
O l
B-10
o APPENDIX C Equipment Considered Acceptable or Conditionally Acceptable (Category 4.3)
LFGEND:
Designation for Deficiency R - Radiation T - Temperature QT, Qualification time RT - Required time P - Pressure H - Humidity CS - Chemical spray A - Material aging evaluation, replacement schedule, ongoing equipment surveillance 5 - Submergence M - Margin I - HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM - Qualification method RPN - Equipment relocation or replacement, adequate schedule not provided EXN - Exempted equipment justification inadequate SEN - Separate-effects qualification justification inadequate QI - Qualification information being developed RPS - Equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-003 Position Switch NAMCO 180 A
I-006 Position Switch NAMCO 180 A
1 I-009 Position Switch NAMCO 180 A
I-012 Position Switch NAMCO 180 A
I-021 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153AA6 A
I-022 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153AA6~
A l
I-023 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153AA6 A
(
i I
C-1
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency 1-024 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153AA6 A
I-064 Pres,sure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-065 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-066 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-067 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-069 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-070 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-071 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-072 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-073 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-074 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-075 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-076 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-077 Tempersture Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-082 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
j I-083 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-084 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-085 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-086 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-087 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-088 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
i I-089 Pressure Transmitter Rosemoun' 1153 A
l I-090 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
i l
I-091 Level Transmitter
.Rosemount 1153 A
j C-2
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-092 Level Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-093 Pressure Transmitter R'osemount 1253 A
I-094 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-095 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-096 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-097 Pressure Transmitter Rosemount 1153 A
I-036 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-037 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-038 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-039 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-040 Motors Reliance EA0 A
t I-041 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-042 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-043 Motors Reliance EA0 A
I-052 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E-11 A
I-053 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E-11 A
I-054 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E-11 A
I-055 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E-11 A
I-056 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-057 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-058 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
l I-059 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
l I-060 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-061 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
i C-3 1
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency I-062 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-063 Temperature Detector Rosemount 104 A
I-080 H Recombiner Westinghouse A
2 I-081 H Recombiner Westinghouse A
2 I-132 Splice Kit Raychem WCSF--N,ANK-A I-133 Connectors Conax 7590 A
I-134 Cable Anaconda Various A
Ou_tside Containment A-053 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E11GM A
A-054 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E11CM A
A-117 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-118 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-123 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-124 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-132 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-133 Pressure Transm'..ter Foxboro E11GM A
A-137 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-138 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E11GM A
A-142 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-143 Pressure Transmitter Foxboro E13DM A
A-085 Valve Motor Tperator Rotark 70NA-2 A
A-102 Valve Motor Operator Rotark 40A A
A-103 Valve Motor Operator Rotark 40A A
C-4
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency A-104 Valve Motor Operato,r Rotark 40A A
A-105 Valve Motor Operator Rotark 40A A
A-106 Valve Motor Operator Rotark 40A A
A-107 Valve Motor Operator Rotark 40A A
e v
=
e C-5
4 APPENDIX D i
Safety-Related Systems List Function System Emergency Reactor Shutdowa Reactor Coolant Reactor Protection Safeguards Actuation Chemical and Volume Control Containment Isolation Main Steam Emergency Feedwater Liquid Radwaste Boron Management Gaseous Radwaste Chilled Water
?
Sampling Containment Spray Recirculation Residual Heat Removal Chemical and Volume Control Main Feedwater 1The NRC staff recognized that there are differences in nomenclature of systems because of plant vintage and engineering design; consequently, some systens performing identical of similar functions may have different names.
In those instances it was necessary to verify the function of the systam(s) with the responsible IE regional reviewer and/or the licensee.
r D-1
av APPENDIX D (Continued) function System Reactor Core Cooling Low Pressure Safety Injection High Pressure Safety Injection Accu =ulators Containment Heat Removal Containment Spray Containment Sump Recirculation Containment Ventilation Core Residual Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal Pressurizer Spray (2)
Power Operated Relief Valves Main Feedwater Auxiliary Feedwater Main Steam Steam Dump (2)
Component Cooling Water Service Water Prevention of Significant Release Containment Spray (Iodine Removal) of Radioact!ve Material to Environment Hydrogen Recombiners Radiation Monitoring Sampling Supporting Systems Emergency Power Area Ventilation Control Room Ventilation D-2