ML19347C322

Summary of 800703 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md Re Preparation of Rept on Compliance w/NUREG-0588, Interim Staff Position on Environ Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment

ML19347C322
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/24/1980
From:	Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0588, RTR-NUREG-588 NUDOCS 8010170312
Download: ML19347C322 (15)

Text

.

i.

8 o,

' UNITED STATES E

h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k

%,..j.. p Docket NoJ 50-364 5EP * ^ 1980 i

1 APPLICANT: Alabama Power Company FACILITY:

' Joseph M.. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 i

SUBJECT:

SIM1ARY OF JULY 3,1980 MEETING REGARDING REVIEW 0F j

OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION i

i The staff in Equipment Qualification Branch met with applicant in Bethesda, Md., to provide guidance to applicant in its preparation of a report on compliance with NUREG-0588, " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety Related Electrical Equipment". is a j

list of attendees.

Applicant presentea its plans for the review and the report, using Enclosure 2 as an outline. Applicant's report will be submitted September 15, 1980.

The staff will complete a preliminary review, including a site trip, for input to the full power Farley 2 SER Supplement (No. 5).

The Qualification i

SER will be completed February 1,1981.

l Mr. Z. Rosztoczy obtained responses to several questions as follows:

1.

Question i.

i What is the permanent organization to assure proper qualification?

Answer.

Applicant has a ' qualifications review task force who will review operating procedures to identify equipment needed to mitigate accidents. After review is completed, the task force. organization will'be evaluated to determine if it should continue pe.rmanently ~or be changed.

2.

Ques tion Is there any one person responsible for approving equipment qualification, perhaps as ~one among other duties?

Answer

- Applicant does' not have an Equipment Qualification czar; rather there are procedures to assure: qualification of new and replacement equipment.

m

e..

Meeting Summary SEP 2 4 1980 Farley Unit No. 2 3.

Question Will the task force's review be recorded? Staff plans to audit records and APCo should also audit its own records.

Answer Yes.

Mr. Rosztoczy stated that when report is received by staff, it will select samples of equipment in the table ~of the report (See page 8 of Enclosure 2) and detennine if information provided 1.s acceptable for review.

If selected samples are not acceptable the entire. report will be returned for modifications.

Review records should indicate what was reviewed, acceptance criteria, signature, and date.

Records should establish correspondence between equipment installed and equipment tested or analyzed.

Proprietary tables will not be accepted.

The format used for IE Bulletin 79-01B is acceptable for this report or 1

confonnance to NUREG-0588.

Mr. F. Ashe described the desired organization of the review report, using the table of contents from a Sequoyah report (Enclosure 3). The report should include a discussion of how equipment will be qualified for an environment that exceeds normal ambient temperature (e.g., high ambient temperature caused by failure of a ventilation system) but is not considered to be a harsh environment (i.e., extremely high temperatures and moisture caused by failure of a pipe transporting high temperature water or steam).

It is not necessary to provide schedule for showing qualification of equipment in a "non-harsh" environment but it should be addressed in the report.

/ }h L. L. Kintner, Project Manager Licensing Branch #2 Division of Licensing Enclosures

As stated cc w/ encl:

See next page

Mr. F. L. Clayton, Jr., Senior Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 ccr Mr. Alan R. Barton Executive Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Vice President Southern Company Services, Inc.

Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Mr. George F. Trowbridge Shaw, Pittman, Potts and.Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. W. Bradford NRC Resident Inspector P. O. Box 1814 Dothan, Alabama 36302 l

ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES MEETING WITH ALABAMA POWER COMPANY JULY 3, 1980 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Nuclear Regulatory Commission L. L. Kintner Z. R. Rosatoczy F. S. Ashe Southern Cornpany Services, Inc.

O. Batum W. C. Ramsey N. J. Santoro R. L. Kinsaul R. R. Lyon f

Westinghouse G. Butterworth J. L. Vota D. H. Rawlins M. Gooding Bechtel A. A. Villi G. M. Langford Alabama Power Company R. P. Mcdonald T. N. Epps T. L. Crawley

ENCLOSURE 2 NUREG 0588 MEETING WITH NRC JULY 3, 1980 1.

INTRODUCTION Purpose Participants II.

GOALS III.

FSAR COMMIINENTS FNP-2 Licensing Bases Environmental Conditions Qualification Results 1

IV.

FNP-2 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW Task Force Organization Review of Sample Systems V.

SUMMARY

l

-/ -.

I I.

REVIEW OF QUALIFICATION Cate:ITNENTS j

FSAR Section 3.11 and 6.2 No specific comunitment to IEEE 323-1971 g

Equipment qualification meets intent of IEEE 323-1971 N

i n

4 s

I a

i I

II.

IDENTIFICATIN OF SERVICE CONDITIONS

- DEPS line break in containment

- MSL break in main steam room

- Time dependent temperature and pressure profiles

- Radiation - gaama dose

}

- Neutron and Beta doses not considered W

- 1007. Relative Humidity assumed

)

4

III.

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION CONDITIONS

- Irradiation

- Cyclic (mechanical) aging - some equipment t

- LOCA Test (including chemical spray)

- Ihermal aging of motors and cable 1

l

e 9

9 i

ser

=

8 0

I a

Y 3

w k

5 0

5:

s!

e m

(~

V.

QUALIFICATION TEST REPORTS Critical review of entire report Analysis of test procedures and test equipment

- Analysis to ensure time dependent parameters envelope postulated accident For accelerated aging, ensure acceptable rationale is used

- Irradiation certification verified I

b 7

i 1

i

e VI.

TYPICAL EXAMPLES NSSS supplier proprietary information

- Terminal blocks I

- Penetrations

- Power / control cable

\\

~

MURFC 0568 ENVIRfMS NTA!, QtJAlfFICATION G EllC1111 CAL f-QUlp>f Mi Type el Equipment /

Mnde! No.

Abnormt! Or f.nvironcent N r.shtilty Olierahtitty A :c urac y Acciaracy l Qtsattitcation Loc at ion Manuf acturer or Identi-Accident to Wh ir e.

R.gutrements Dreenstrated hequire-Deann.

Report and gemarks fication Envirewent Qual t f lat mente strated Pee thod Contatraent Ceneral 100 Refer to FSAR lACA Profile:

Not remata Functional test None None General Electric Penetration (Iow Electric geries Fig. 6.2-6 for functional for at end of Report "100 340*F 103 vottose) temperature and 3 hre; 320* pets for ttfe of plant, qualtftcettea series stectries Contatnment Fig. 6.2-4 for F, 80 pets followed by program (follow.

Containment Elev. 1438-0" pressure profiles; for 3 hre., 260*F, RACA, uhtte tag LOCA) preved Penetratione" 100% relative 25 gets for 18 hre.,

malateinsna penetration dated Jon.1974 humidity; borte 250*F 16 pets for contatament capable of con-and Addendum dl acid, 40,000 ppe 7 days; relottse houndary inte-ttnutng to dated Mar.1974 buffered to pH of humidity 100%;

grity.

perform Ste Method of 10.5 with sodium continuove spray 51 electrieel quatttteetten -

hydrostde; borte ocid buffered function with a sequentially 7

radtation 5 m to to pH of 10.5.

leek rate of age, trradiate Rede gasuma.

Total lategrated I a 10' ec setemic and IDCA g

samma dose I a 10 He/sec. at deelse test. Test

Rade, pressure during spectame wee ESCA.

thermelly eycled for120cycjee

$0*F to 150 F to g

50*F at 8 bes.

per cycle.

Thermal aging wee beoed on Arrhreatus model and thermo.

gravimetrie analyste metre temperature of 3et*F for 216 hre.,equtglent.

to 3.5 m to hrs (40 yre.) at 160*F.

k h

h h

Power Cable / Control The Okontre Okontte/

Refer to FSAR Fig.

IACA Profile:

h et be capable Functional teste None None The (htentre Co.

Cable - all locatione Company Okoprene/

6.2-6 for tempera-of performing including con-Ramsey, J.J.

Okalon/

ture, and Fla.

Rase up to 324*F at safety function tinuous voltese Engineering Okoguard 6.2-4 for preesure 80 pets and dwell during and fol-and current Report No.141 Cable profiles; 100%

for 4 hre. Ramp lowing e IDCA loading, were dated 2-29-72.

relative humidtry; down to 2 52*F et efter 40 yre.

performed durtna The quellfice-borte meld 10,000 16 pets avel dwell service.

ell phases of th<

tien sneladed G

ppe buffered to pH for 7 doye.

1001 quelatication subjecting the of 10.5 with rotative humidity; prostem. All semples to ther-endium hydrontde continuove spray samplee succese-met aging (121*C radiation 5m10g constet taa of horic fully withetoed for 168 hre.,

Rade assuna.

scid, 10,000 ppe, the deserthed Arrhenius Model endiens hydron tde accident condt-equivalent of for pH of 10. %

tiona efter Radsstion 2 a 10, 40 yre.), fel-arttitclat heat loved by sense

1ade, entna followed redletten irrun by radiation Cobalt-60 in air y

esposure.

for e tetet dose of 2 s 108 Rado.

r

~

- +

~

4 e

NUREC 0586 ENVIRGef MTAL QUALIFICATION & Et2CTRICAL EQUlrffMT Type at Equipment /

Model No.

Abnormal Or t.nvirunpent Operab(11ty Operability Acc ur ac y Accur ac y Quattf teet ton tacttien Manufacturer or Identi.

Accident to Which requirsmente Deewestrated Require.

Demone Report and ammerke mente otrated Method fication Envieenment Qualifted Narrow Benge Restatence t ea-at WestinWioues Refer to FSAR Fig.

Westinghouse Proprie-30 seconde 40 year life 30.2%

westing.

WCAP-9157 Thte esagement te part of Therenmeter Detectore -

Proprietary 6.1-6 for temperature.ory Claes 2. for Foot SLB Over 30 seconde of open house (Test)

WSS$ Seepe (weetinghomee)

Claae 2 and Figure 6.2-4 fee time dependent Post SLB rreprie-and to propetetery. the tery detalle of the qualtft-taside Containment preseure profiles; temperat.re end Class 2 cation program are 100% relative humid-pressure r efiles, and described in Weettaghouse try; chemical spray radietton dose.

Document WCAP-9157.

borte acid 10.000 ppe Chemical sprey,1.146 tnffered to pH of ut. % borte acid and 10.5 utth sodium 0.17 ut. % sodium hydronide dissolved hydrontde.

y Radiation - 5 m 10 in water.

Bade Tarminal Bloche -

States company Type ZWM Defer to FSAR Fig.

IDCA Profile:

Must be capable Terminal bloche pone Nees Wyle labore-Terminal bloche were of performing uere demonstrate I

teries Report emeleoed te vested MEMA 4 to and out of Divisten of Catalog No.

6.2-6 for temperature sto oefety to still be 44354-1 dated encleeures during all up Coctoinment Multi-Amp M-25012 and Figure 6.2-4 for

,f,'3, u e h function during functional fol-3-8-79

@elt-phemes of the quantitee-Corporetton preeeure profitees

'"'I"'"*9 ps.*Ji ISCA pro-touteg the LDCA fleetton enthod tien program. This to the relattve humidity -

I' I' '

file af ter 40 test et the end included irra-only configurettee in 1001; Spray - boric emp dwn to 28"' %

years of service of the quattit-diettog of which E M termanal bleche I

acid 10.000 pra cettenet program I a 10 made can be comeldered buf fered to pH of Prefe e - Bemp to g m total guelifted, Q

10.5 with sodium

&6.3 pets in 15 sec.

hydrei de; radiation -

Duell et 46.3 pets foi thumally estag' 5 m to made ge m.

258 sec.

pamp down t<

I 15.3 pela in 30 min.

63 r at $2*C Duell at 15.3 pets the equivalent for 7 days. Ste t of 40 yeere et chemical opray (borte 120'F service

[

ecid and sodium g _

hydrontde) af ter 55 acc.; continue model, eetente fordurettonoftegt.

teettag fettemed t

i Radiation - I w 10 gy gpCA,,,,,

Rede.

C3 W

L97)

M 2EED b

d

~~

p

,m

^

n p

~

E 8

8 8

8

_ ah

. _.. ~. _ _

1 g

- - ~

~

o gag V

n.-.

~~ _

_ ~ -. _..

n

, g; t{y p_...

gygy.pg gg

,g e

g

)

2 _

~ ~ '

. \\\\

s 4o j

\\

y 9g g

\\

. _ - ~ ~

]

i\\'

~

~

~. _;-~.:

ZZ q,

~

g g

f/

\\

f f

-)

,, j K

EU 2o

'7

~

'( -

~

~

~

~

~

ANEND. 64 3/4/77

. - _ ~ ~\\ )'

~

'.T '.Z !.-

4

/

g Q

AL ABANA P0tER COMPANY L_D

/.

I l? -

JOSEPH N. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT

\\

10 -

7--

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT q__ 3

/

BEPS, NININUR ESP, OSA

/~~

g

_ 1, (

LONG TEM PRESSURE VS. &

'J. ~. ~

~

TINE

\\

//CSSO/C Hs D C -~

~

j/,

N FIGJRE 6.2-4 Q

t..

s m

,e

,e

%9h-JsED

1. 5,..

6 'J'l, e

,e ia-

,e U-I.sah

t. tt,/,

ll.57tl.

T o m e ( s ec.)

ENCLOSURE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract.....................

i A.

Introducti on...................

1 B.

Servi ce Conditi ons................

3 B.1 Inside Containnent................

3 B.2 Outside Containment 5

B.3 Equipment Not Served by Class lE Environmental Contai nment System...............

10 C.

Equipment Qualification Methods D.

Equipment Reviews E.

Equipment Tables.

F.

Conclusion...

Appendix A - TVA Design Criteria SQN-DC-V-17.0..

Appendix B - Conclusion Statement - NUREG-0578, Section 2.1.6.m

,