ML19347A862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 800826 Request for Info Re Containment Emergency Sump Debris
ML19347A862
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1980
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton, Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8009300434
Download: ML19347A862 (4)


Text

..

Duxz POWER COMPANY Powra Bc Lotxo 422 SocTn Cauncu SrazzTo GnAntoTTz, N. C. asa4a wiwam o. waansa.sa.

September 24, 1980 VeCE PatSsDtes?

TELepwows; AntA 704 Setaan Paoowetione 373-4083 Mr. Harold R'.

Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attention:

Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Projects Branch No. 1 Re: McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370

Dear Mr. Denton:

The attached is provided in response to Mr. Robert L. Tedesco's letter of August 26, 1980 which requested information regarding the containment emergency sump.

If you have additional questions regarding this matter, please advise.

/

Ve, truly yours,

/u -

J./

m.

William O. Parker, Jr.

Q GAC:scs Attachment 3ool s

/ /

""*% yy

4 McGuire Nuclear Station Response to NRC Request for Information Containment Emergency Sump Debris 1.

In addition to insulation debris resulting from LOCA effects, debris can be generated within the containment from other sources, such as (1) degraded materials (paint chips), and (2) items which are taken into and left in the containment following maintenance and inspection activities.

Describe how the house keeping program for McGuire will control and limit debris accumulation from these sources. The objectives are to assure that debris capable of defeating the post-LOCA core cooling functions are identified and removed from the containment. The response should include references to specific procedures or other means to assure that "as licensed" cleanliness will be attained prior to initial operation and prior to each resumption of operation.

Response

The area inside containment is designated as a Level V cleanliness area. This means that the area must be maintained sufficiently clean so that work activities can be performed efficiently and the requisite quality of the components in the area can be maintained. Excess material is not allowed to accumulate in these areas. These require-

'ments are contained in McGuire station procedures.

Additionally, prior to establishing containment integrity, a visual inspection of the containment is conducted as required by Technical Specifications. On at least an 18-month cycle, a detailed inspection of the containment emergency sump is performed. This requirement is also contained in the Technical Specifications.

2.

Address the degree of compliance of McGuire with the following recommenda-tions which is also set forth as item C.14 of Regulatory Guide 1.82:

)

"In-service inspection requirements for coolant pump components (trash racks, screens, and pump suction inlets) should include the following:

a.

Coolant sump components should be inspected during every refueling period downtime, and b.

The inspection should be visual examination of the components for evidence of structural distress or corrosion."

Response

Both of the requirements are contained in the McGuire Technical Specifications.

6 3.

Both cavitation and air entrainment could be expected to cause pump vibra-tion and oscillations in system flow rate and pressure. Show that the operator will be provided with sufficient instrumentation and appropriate indications to allow and enable detection of these problems. List the instrumentation available giving both the location of the sensor and the readout.

The incidence of cavitation, air entrainment or vortex formation could be reduced by reducing the system flow rate. The operator should have the capability to perform indicated actions (e.g., throttling or terminating flow, resort to alternate cooling system, etc.).

Show that the emergency operating instructions and the operator training consider the need to monitor the long-term performance of the recirculation system and consider the need for corrective actions to alleviate problems.

Response

In the event problems such as pump cavitation or air entrainment occur in the LPI recirculation system, instrumentation and controls provided in the main control room allow the operator to recognize the problem and take appropriate corrective action. Cavitation or air entrainment would result in system flow rate and pressure oscillations that are monitored in the control room by the following instrumentation:

RRR Heat Exchanger lA Outlet Flow RRR Heat Exchanger 1B Outlet Flow RHR Pump 1A Discharge Pressure RHR Pump 1B Discharge Pressure Additionally, annunciator alarms are provided in the control room for low system flow in either train of RHR as measured on the discharge side of the RHR pumps.

Remote manual controls are provided in the main control room and on the auxiliary shutdown panel to allow throttling of RHR Pumps LA and IB discharge flow control valves. By throttling system flow, the operator can reduce the effects of cavitation and air entrainment.

Emergency procedures for all accidents specifically address actions necessary to get the plant to a stable condition. Normally, this would be done within the first day. Beyond that time frame, there are no specific procedural steps. However, for any significant event the entire Duke Power Company emergency response organization would be activated and would be monitoring plant conditions closely and making the necessary decisions regarding need for any corrective actions or changes in plant status.

Accordingly, it is felt that emergency procedures and operator training specifically directed at long-term performance of the recirculation system are unnecessary.

4.

Does McGuire utilize similar materials in the containment during power operation for purposes such as reactor cavity annulus biological shielding (e.g., sand tanks or sand bags) or reactor cavity blow out sand plugs?

3_

Response

McGuire does not use any loose material inside the containment for shielding material during. operation of the unit nor are there any reactor cavity blow out plugs.

5.

Discuss the potential for paint chips degrading ECCS performance.

Response

Due to the location of the McGuire containment sump screen, in the pipe tunnel outside the polar crane wall, it is unlikely that paint chips would reach the screen. The flow paths to the sump screen are spare piping sleeves located in the crane wall near containment floor level.

Therefore, lighter paint chips floating on the water surface are unable to reach the sump screen. Heavier chips which settle to the containment floor inside the crane wall also are unable to reach the sump screen due to the low approach velocity (0.24 fps), as determined by ARL from sump model testing. However, if paint chips were able to reach the sump screen, a fine screen (0.25 inch mesh size) is provided to prevent degradation of ECCS performance. Sump model tests were performed by ARL with up to 50 percent screen blockage (67.5 ft2 screen surface area) without degrading ECCS performance. The containment spray nozzles, which have 3/8 inch spray orifices, are not subject to clogging by particles less than 1/4 inch maximum dimension. All other valves, pumps and heat exchangers have suffi-cient clearances to pass particles of less than 1/4 inch.

l

_