ML19344D733
| ML19344D733 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 04/09/1980 |
| From: | Baer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004280076 | |
| Download: ML19344D733 (4) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _
p#
UNITED STATES
,?
1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
,j WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 e
...../
APR o W 1980 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
Vice President, Steam Production Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Parker:
SUBJECT:
SEPARATION FIELD AUDIT OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS FOR MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 Thank you for your letter dated December 26, 1979 responding to our request that an independent field audit of installed electric systems and equipment be conducted at McGuire, Units 1 and 2, to detemine confomance to the FSAR separation criteria.
In your letter you noted the procedures and mechanisms for routing and install-ling sa,fety-related cables at McGuire, and that previous site visits have been conducted jointly by Duke and the NRC to check selected safety-related equip-ment and cable separation. Also, you noted that additional attention was warranted for the routing and separation of non-safety-related cables (assoc-iated circuits) that are routed with safety-related cables. We agree that your review along with the previous audit of selected cables and equipment contributes substantially to the overall safety of the plant. However, your review appears to lack an essential aspect of our request which is the per-formance of a detailed field audit by an independent group, one not involved in the original design and installation of the equipment and systems under audit. The NRC participation in the audit was limited in scope and did not include the detail we believe necessary.
i l
l 800428 0g
l Nr. William O. Parker, Jr. APR 0 91980 Therefore, we continue to believe that an independent, plant-wide field audit of safety-related equipment and cables is necessary in addition to your planned audit of e.:sociated circuit cables. We request that an audit be performed as described in Enclosure 2 to our November 30, 1979 letter.
Sincerely, l
l f.
Robert L. Baer, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 2 i
Division of Project Management cc: See next page k
1+
l l
l
J
)
APR C 9 MRK)
Mr. William O. Parker, Jr.
Vice Fresident, Steam Production Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 422 Soe'h Church Street Charlot.1, North Carolina 28242 cc: Mr. W. L. Porter Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Mr. R. S. Howard Power Systems Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. E. J. Keith EDS Nuclear Incorporated 220 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 Mr. J. E. Houghtaling NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Mr. Jesse L. Riley, President The Carolina Environmental Study Group 854 Henfey Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Robert M. Lazo, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Atomir, Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr., Ofrector Bodega Marine Lab of California l'
P. O. Box 247 Bodega Bay, California 94923 b
r r
i L.
Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
cc: David Flesichaker, Esq.
1735 Eye Street, N. W.,
Suite 709 Washington, D. C.
20006 Richard P. Wilson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General State of South Carolina 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 i
i 4
9 F
e G
I L
a 9
h 9
r 8
I a
e e
F e
__